++

CORREALATION:
++ + -- -
+ -- High Positive High Negative
positive negative
++ + - + Relationships:
9 3 1 0
1:Low Functional Req. Weight Size Power Cost Design Strong Moderate Weak None
5:High  COMPARITIVE EVALUATION (1:Low , 5:High)
Customer Customer Req. Score For Relationship Weighted Satisfaction Competitor Competitor Competitor
rating ↓ Score Rating Rating 1 Rating 2 Rating 3
1 5 Power consumption 9 1 9 3 0 110 4 5 4 4
2 4 Weight of machine 9 3 9 3 1 100 5 4 4 5
3 4 Cost effective 3 3 3 9 1 76 4 4 5 3
4 4 Size & design 1 1 0 1 9 48 5 3 3 4
5 4 Portable 9 9 3 0 9 120 5 4 5 4
6 5 Capacity 3 3 0 0 9 75 3 4 3 3
7 4 Visual appeal 0 0 0 0 9 36 5 4 4 5
8 3 Environment effect 3 0 9 3 0 45 5 4 5 5
Technical Important Score 157 84 132 76 161 610 36 32 33 33
Importance % 26% 14% 22% 12% 26% 76% 90% 80% 83% 83%
Priorities Rank 2 4 3 5 1
Current Performance 4 4 5 4 4 1:Very Easy , 5:Very Difficult
Target 4 3 4 3 5 1:Very Low , 5:Very High
Benchmark 4 3 4 3 5