Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Micronutrient Supplementation
Micronutrient Supplementation
24, 2022
PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER
Micronutrient Supplementation to
Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Peng An, PHD,a,* Sitong Wan, BSC,a,* Yongting Luo, PHD,a Junjie Luo, PHD,a Xu Zhang, MSC,a Shuaishuai Zhou, MSC,a
Teng Xu, MSC,a Jingjing He, PHD,a Jeffrey I. Mechanick, MD,b Wen-Chih Wu, MD, MPH,c,d,e Fazheng Ren, PHD,a
Simin Liu, MD, SCDc,d,e
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Healthy dietary patterns are rich in micronutrients, but their influence on cardiovascular disease (CVD)
risks has not been systematically quantified.
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive and most up-to-date evidence-based map that
systematically quantifies the impact of micronutrients on CVD outcomes.
METHODS This study comprised a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled intervention trials of
micronutrients on CVD risk factors and clinical events.
RESULTS A total of 884 randomized controlled intervention trials evaluating 27 types of micronutrients among
883,627 participants (4,895,544 person-years) were identified. Supplementation with n-3 fatty acid, n-6 fatty acid,
L-arginine, L-citrulline, folic acid, vitamin D, magnesium, zinc, a-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10, melatonin, catechin, curcumin,
flavanol, genistein, and quercetin showed moderate- to high-quality evidence for reducing CVD risk factors. Specifically,
n-3 fatty acid supplementation decreased CVD mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97), myocardial
infarction (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.92), and coronary heart disease events (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.93). Folic acid
supplementation decreased stroke risk (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97), and coenzyme Q10 supplementation decreased
all-cause mortality events (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.94). Vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, and selenium showed no
effect on CVD or type 2 diabetes risk. b-carotene supplementation increased all-cause mortality (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-
1.15), CVD mortality events (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18), and stroke risk (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17).
CONCLUSIONS Supplementation of some but not all micronutrients may benefit cardiometabolic health. This study
highlights the importance of micronutrient diversity and the balance of benefits and risks to promote and maintain
cardiovascular health in diverse populations. (Antioxidant Supplementation in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardio-
vascular Diseases; CRD42022315165) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2022;80:2269–2285) © 2022 by the American College of
Cardiology Foundation.
From the aDepartment of Nutrition and Health, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Key
Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; bKravis Center for Clinical
Listen to this manuscript’s Cardiovascular Health at Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; cCenter
audio summary by for Global Cardiometabolic Health, Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; dDepartment
Editor-in-Chief of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; and the eDepartment of Surgery, Brown University, Providence,
Dr Valentin Fuster on Rhode Island, USA. *Dr An and Ms Wan contributed equally to this work.
www.jacc.org/journal/jacc. Hector Ventura, MD, served as Guest Associate Editor for this paper. Christopher O’Connor, MD, served as Guest Editor-in-Chief
for this paper.
The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’
institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information,
visit the Author Center.
A
ABBREVIATIONS large portion of cardiovascular dis- duration to fully capture the developmental pro-
AND ACRONYMS ease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes cesses of these clinical outcomes. Recently, the
(T2D)-related death or disability is COSMOS (Cocoa Supplement and Multivitamin Out-
A1C = hemoglobin A1C
attributed to suboptimal dietary practices.1 comes Study) trial investigators 20,21 reported some
CVD = cardiovascular disease
Recently, a novel cardiometabolic-based favorable effects of polyphenols on CVD risk,
DBP = diastolic blood pressure
chronic disease model based on staged pro- although much of the dietary evidence in humans
FBG = fasting blood glucose gression of multiple complex and interacting comes from intervention trials of micronutrients on
FBI = fasting blood insulin metabolic drivers of CVD over time, as well as CVD risk factors such as blood pressure, blood lipids,
HDL-C = high-density social determinants of health (including and T2D risk.
lipoprotein cholesterol
transcultural factors), was configured into a To personalize cardiometabolic preventive and
LDL-C = low-density 3-dimensional model to expose early and therapeutic dietary practices, it is of critical impor-
lipoprotein cholesterol
sustainable opportunities for preventive tance to have a comprehensive and in-depth under-
MI = myocardial infarction
care.2,3 Lifestyle medicine, based on chronic standing of the balance of benefits and risks
RCT = randomized controlled
behavior patterns, has been shown to be a associated with constituent micronutrients in diverse
trial
powerful preventive care modality, with dietary patterns. We therefore conducted a system-
RR = relative risk
good nutrition as a critical foundation.4 atic review and meta-analyses of all available ran-
SBP = systolic blood pressure
SEE PAGE 2286
domized controlled trials (RCTs), investigating the
T2D = type 2 diabetes
interventional effect of micronutrients with antioxi-
TC = total cholesterol The latest scientific statement from the dant properties on CVD risk factors and events,
TG = triglyceride American Heart Association now recom- including the risk of T2D, in diverse populations.
mends dietary patterns, including the Mediterranean
METHODS
diet and DASH (the Dietary Approach to Stop Hyper-
tension), as preventive or treatment approaches for
This review was performed in adherence with the
CVDs and T2D. 5 A common feature of these dietary
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
patterns is that they are low in nutrients associated
and Meta-Analyses guidelines 22 and registered at the
with higher CVD risk such as saturated fat and so-
International Prospective Register of Systematic Re-
dium, and rich in micronutrients such as phyto-
views (PROSPERO: CRD42022315165). RCTs included
chemicals, unsaturated fatty acids, antioxidant
in this meta-analysis had ethics approval from their
vitamins, and minerals.6 However, population in-
respective Institutional Review Boards. 单
takes of antioxidant micronutrients from food sour-
ces has remained unchanged in the United States in SEARCH STRATEGY. The PubMed, Web of Science,
recent decades.7-10 Survey data also indicated a lack and Embase databases were searched to identify RCTs
of diversity in the source of antioxidant micro- published up to May 1, 2022, that used antioxidant
nutrients in the typical U.S. diet, suggesting that the micronutrients to improve cardiovascular risk factors
health benefits of diverse micronutrients and phyto- and CVD event occurrence rates (Supplemental
chemicals intake remain obscure and misunderstood Appendix 1). Articles assessing the effects of these
by the general public. For example, instead of fruits micronutrients on systolic blood pressure (SBP), dia-
and vegetables in their natural form, tea and sup- stolic blood pressure (DBP), low-density lipoprotein
plements were the major dietary antioxidant sources cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein choles-
in supplement users; for nonusers, tea also contrib- terol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG),
uted the most part of dietary antioxidants.11,12 hemoglobin A1C (A1C), fasting blood glucose (FBG),
Mechanistically, micronutrients such as vitamin C, fasting blood insulin (FBI), all-cause mortality, CVD
vitamin D, n-3 fatty acids, magnesium, and phyto- mortality, MI, stroke, coronary heart disease,
chemicals benefit cardiometabolic health physiologi- arrhythmia, and T2D risk were included for further
cally by eliminating free radicals and reducing review (Supplemental Appendices 2 and 3).
inflammatory and platelet activity, while maintaining STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. Effect sizes of CVD out-
the homeostasis of endothelial cells and cardiac comes were obtained by using a random effects
function.13-17 Free radicals also impair b -cell function model and are expressed here as the weighted mean
and insulin sensitivity, contributing to hyperglycemia difference and 95% CI or as the relative risk (RR) and
and insulin resistance, which could further promote 95% CI. Mean differences with a P value <0.05 were
the development of CVD.18,19 Few studies could considered statistically significant. RevMan version
directly examine the efficacy of antioxidant micro- 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata/SE
nutrients on major CVDs such as stroke or myocardial version 17.0 (StataCorp) were used to perform all
infarction (MI), which require a long intervention statistical analyses (Supplemental Appendices 4 to 7).
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2271
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Articles excluded
No randomization, n = 361
No relevant outcome, n = 275
Studies with short intervention duration, n = 58
Studies on CVD risk factors were performed
in patients with severe cardiometabolic
disorders, n = 68
Articles included
n = 751, consisting of 884 RCTs
The PubMed, Web of Science, and the Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used antioxidant
micronutrients to improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, CVD, and type 2 diabetes event occurrence rates. Based on the
predefined eligibility criteria, a total of 884 RCTs were included.
these lowered both SBP and DBP levels, including to 0.08 mmol/L]). Supplementation of a median dose
L -arginine (median dose 6 g/d; range 1.3-30 g/d), of 400 mg/d magnesium (range 200-729 mg/d)
L -citrulline (median dose 6 g/d; range 2-6 g/d), folic improved TG (0.14 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.26 to
acid (median dose 5 mg/d; range 0.25-15 mg/d), 0.02 mmol/L]) and HDL-C (0.04 mmol/L [95% CI:
magnesium (median dose 400 mg/d; range 0.01 to 0.07 mmol/L]). Supplementation of a median
200-729 mg/d), a -lipoic acid (median dose 600 mg/d; dose of 30 mg/d zinc (range 5-200 mg/d) improved TC
range 100-2,400 mg/d), genistein (median dose (0.34 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.16 mmol/L]) and
54 mg/d; range 50-90 mg/d), and resveratrol (median TG (0.28 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.45 to 0.11 mmol/L]).
dose 390 mg/d; range 75-3,000 mg/d). The blood EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION
pressure–lowering effects were comparable in per- ON BLOOD GLUCOSE. Twenty-two of the micro-
sons receiving L -arginine (SBP 4.51 mm Hg [95% CI: nutrients studied were assessed for effects of sup-
6.64 to 2.37 mm Hg], DBP 2.31 mm Hg [95% CI: plementation on blood glucose (Figures 5 and 6). Eight
3.64 to 0.98 mm Hg]), L -citrulline (SBP micronutrients lowered multiple glycemic parame-
3.10 mm Hg [95% CI: 5.25 to 0.95 mm Hg], DBP ters: curcumin, zinc, L-arginine, folic acid, vitamin D,
3.37 mm Hg [95% CI: 5.14 to 1.59 mm Hg]), catechin, flavanol, and genistein. Curcumin decreased
folic acid (SBP 2.74 mm Hg [95% CI: 4.50 A1C (0.55% [95% CI: 0.99% to 0.12%]), FBG
to 0.98 mm Hg], DBP 1.56 mm Hg [95% CI: 2.38 to (0.44 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.70 to 0.18 mmol/L]), and
0.74 mm Hg]), magnesium (SBP 4.91 mm Hg [95% FBI (8.45 pmol/L [95% CI: 10.45 to 6.44 pmol/L]).
CI: 8.04 to 1.78 mm Hg], DBP 2.75 mm Hg [95% Zinc decreased A1C (0.56% [95% CI: 0.97% to
CI: 4.51 to 0.99 mm Hg]), a -lipoic acid (SBP 0.16%]), FBG (0.71 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.35 to
6.02 mm Hg [95% CI: 9.73 to 2.31 mm Hg], DBP 0.07 mmol/L]), and FBI (22.79 pmol/L [95% CI:
3.73 mm Hg [95% CI: 6.02 to 1.44 mm Hg]), 38.43 to 7.15 pmol/L]). L –arginine decreased FBG
genistein (SBP 10.02 mm Hg [95% CI: 11.55 (0.22 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.42 to 0.02 mmol/L]) and
to 8.49 mm Hg], DBP 9.13 mm Hg [95% CI: 12.80 FBI (11.33 pmol/L [95% CI: 21.65 to 1.02 pmol/L]).
to 5.46 mm Hg]), and resveratrol (SBP 3.26 mm Hg Folic acid decreased FBG (0.07 mmol/L [95% CI:
[95% CI: 6.36 to 0.16 mm Hg], DBP 2.04 mm Hg 0.15 to 0.00 mmol/L]) and FBI (25.73 pmol/L [95%
[95% CI: 3.93 to 0.15 mm Hg]). CI: 36.41 to 15.04 pmol/L]). Vitamin D decreased
EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION A1C (0.10% [95% CI: 0.15% to 0.04%]) and FBG
ON BLOOD LIPIDS. Twenty-six of the micronutrients (0.12 pmol/L [95% CI: 0.23 to 0.02 pmol/L]).
studied were assessed for effects of supplementation Catechin decreased A1C (0.12% [95% CI: 0.23% to
on blood lipid levels (Figures 3 and 4). Seven micro- 0.02%]) and FBG (0.10 pmol/L [95% CI: 0.17 to
nutrients improved multiple blood lipid parameters: 0.03 pmol/L]). Flavanol decreased FBG
anthocyanin, folic acid, n-6 fatty acid, n-3 fatty-acid, (0.19 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.33 to 0.05 mmol/L]) and
genistein, magnesium, and zinc. Supplementation of FBI (14.86 pmol/L [95% CI: 21.02 to 8.71 pmol/L]).
a median dose of 160 mg/d anthocyanin (range Genistein decreased FBG (0.44 mmol/L [95% CI:
1.65-1,024 mg/d) improved LDL-C (0.18 mmol/L [95% 0.52 to 0.37 mmol/L]) and FBI (11.61 pmol/L [95%
CI: 0.31 to 0.06 mmol/L]), TC (0.18 mmol/L [95% CI: 15.40 to 7.82 pmol/L]).
CI: 0.33 to 0.02 mmol/L]), HDL-C (0.18 mmol/L EFFECTS OF POLYPHENOL SUPPLEMENTATION AMONG
[95% CI: 0.12 to 0.25 mmol/L]), and TG (0.47 mmol/L INDIVIDUALS WITH DIFFERENT CARDIOMETABOLIC
[95% CI: 0.70 to 0.24 mmol/L]). Supplementation of HEALTH PROFILES. Subgroup analysis of polyphenol
a median dose of 5 mg/d folic acid (range 0.25-15 mg/d) supplementation was performed in participants with
improved LDL-C (0.33 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.43 to different cardiometabolic health profiles (Figure 7).
0.23 mmol/L]), TC (0.17 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.30 to For apparently healthy individuals, a median dose of
0.04 mmol/L]), and TG (0.79 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.42 146.5 mg/d (range 6.5-20,000 mg/d) polyphenol
to 0.15 mmol/L]). Supplementation of a median supplementation improved blood lipids (TC
dose of 4.25 g/d n-6 fatty acid (range 1-20 g/d) 0.06 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.12 to 0.01 mmol/L]),
improved LDL-C (0.19 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.35 to HDL–C (0.09 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.03 to 0.14 mmol/L]),
0.03 mmol/L]), TC (0.24 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.37 to TG (0.17 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.32 to 0.02 mmol/L]),
0.11 mmol/L]), and HDL-C (0.04 mmol/L [95% CI: and blood glucose (FBG 0.16 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.28
0.01 to 0.07 mmol/L]). Supplementation of a median to 0.05 mmol/L]), and FBI (5.32 pmol/L [95% CI:
dose of 54 mg/d genistein (range 50-90 mg/d) 9.02 to 1.62 pmol/L]). For people with pre-T2D or
improved LDL-C (0.43 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.81 to T2D, a median dose of 261.8 mg/d polyphenols (range
0.04 mmol/L]) and TC (0.22 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.35 25–1,344 mg/d) improved blood glucose (A1C 0.19%
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2273
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Micronutrient Outcome Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Blood Pressure I2 Egger’s Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid Systolic BP 55 2,950/2,933 —1.21 [—3.08 to 0.65] 0.98 0.085 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 51 2,705/2,694 —0.28 [—1.14 to 0.59] 0.89 0.161 Moderatea
n-6 fatty acid Systolic BP 15 593/596 0.47 [—1.85 to 2.78] 0.82 0.579 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 14 573/576 —0.31 [—2.32 to 1.70] 0.90 0.677 Moderatea
L-arginine Systolic BP 25 644/641 —4.51 [–6.64 to —2.37] 0.76 0.179 Moderateb
Diastolic BP 23 510/507 —2.31 [–3.64 to —0.98] 0.75 0.311 Moderateb
L-citrulline Systolic BP 13 158/161 —3.10 [–5.25 to —0.95] 0.41 0.795 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 13 158/161 —3.37 [–5.14 to —1.59] 0.64 0.121 Lowa,b
Folic acid Systolic BP 18 4,775/4,843 –2.74 [—4.50 to —0.98] 0.91 0.039 Lowa,b
Diastolic BP 16 4,750/4,818 –1.56 [—2.38 to —0.74] 0.78 0.101 Lowa,b
Vitamin C Systolic BP 12 479/480 —0.62 [—1.84 to 0.60] 0.00 0.442 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 11 284/285 —0.66 [—2.87 to 1.55] 0.61 0.945 Moderatea
Vitamin C + E Systolic BP 2 97/99 —5.45 [—11.03 to 0.13] 0.00 - Moderatea
Diastolic BP 2 97/99 —3.38 [—7.54 to 0.78] 0.00 - Moderatea
α-lipoic acid Systolic BP 10 431/433 —6.02 [–9.73 to —2.31] 0.48 0.147 High
Diastolic BP 10 431/442 —3.73 [–6.02 to —1.44] 0.67 0.301 Lowa,b
Coenzyme Q10 Systolic BP 19 504/508 —3.55 [—6.70 to —0.41] 0.66 0.556 Lowa,b
Diastolic BP 18 539/490 —0.92 [—3.08 to 1.25] 0.70 0.914 Moderateb
Lycopene Systolic BP 15 499/462 —1.95 [–3.54 to —0.36] 0.63 0.859 Very lowa,b,c
Diastolic BP 1 333/296 —1.12 [—2.84 to 0.61] 0.22 0.281 Lowa,c
Melatonin Systolic BP 9 223/201 —1.97 [—5.72 to 1.78] 0.55 0.329 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 7 179/157 —0.53 [—2.76 to 1.70] 0.31 0.629 Moderatea
Selenium Systolic BP 2 61/62 0.57 [—2.11 to 3.26] 0.00 - Moderatea
Diastolic BP 2 61/62 —0.54 [—2.30 to 1.22] 0.00 - Moderatea
Magnesium Systolic BP 15 414/424 —4.91 [—8.04 to —1.78] 0.61 0.490 Lowa,b
Diastolic BP 15 414/424 —2.75 [—4.51 to —0.99] 0.55 0.564 Lowa,b
Zinc Systolic BP 7 252/267 —1.82 [—3.97 to 0.34] 0.00 0.942 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 7 252/267 —0.85 [—2.19 to 0.49] 0.00 0.916 Moderatea
Anthocyanin Systolic BP 29 717/708 —0.43 [—1.82 to 0.96] 0.80 0.733 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 28 633/681 —0.57 [—1.87 to 0.74] 0.86 0.279 Moderatea
Catechin Systolic BP 28 894/865 —0.61 [—1.55 to 0.32] 0.13 0.618 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 26 804/779 —0.79 [—1.61 to 0.02] 0.39 0.345 Moderatea
Curcumin Systolic BP 13 426/426 —1.16 [—2.19 to —0.14] 0.17 0.128 Moderatea
Diastolic BP 12 421/413 —0.02 [—1.27 to 1.23] 0.67 0.187 Moderatea
–10 –5 0 5 10 mm Hg
Micronutrient vs Control
Twenty-five micronutrients were assessed for the supplemental effects on systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic BP. aRated down for
imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency. cRated down for risk of bias. GRADE ¼ Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development
and Evaluation; Int/Con ¼ intervention/control; WMD ¼ weighted mean difference.
2274 An et al JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022
Micronutrient Outcome Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Blood Lipid I2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid TC 54 1,836/1,779 —0.05 [—0.19 to 0.08] 0.88 0.250 Moderatea
LDL-C 54 2,097/2,004 0.03 [—0.08 to 0.15] 0.95 0.332 Moderatea
TG 57 2,105/2,077 —0.33 [—0.42 to —0.24] 0.86 0.719 Moderateb
HDL-C 58 2,172/2,133 0.21 [0.14 to 0.29] 0.98 0.232 Moderateb
n-6 fatty acid TC 18 547/403 —0.24 [—0.37 to —0.11] 0.03 0.871 High
LDL-C 17 520/526 —0.19 [—0.35 to —0.03] 0.65 0.318 Lowa,b
TG 17 354/343 —0.17 [—0.55 to 0.22] 0.91 0.422 Moderatea
HDL-C 19 587/593 0.04 [0.01 to 0.07] 0.00 0.744 Moderatea
n-9 fatty acid TC 10 200/200 —0.05 [—0.22 to 0.13] 0.90 0.825 Moderatea
LDL-C 11 247/218 —0.06 [—0.16 to 0.04] 0.41 0.021 Moderatea
TG 11 218/218 0.05 [0.00 to 0.10] 0.00 0.485 Moderatea
HDL-C 11 218/218 —0.01 [—0.03 to 0.02] 0.00 0.183 Moderatea
Seventeen micronutrients were assessed for the supplemental effects on total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C),
triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). aRated down for imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency. cRated
down for risk of bias. See Figure 2 for other abbreviations.
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2275
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Micronutrient Outcome Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Blood Lipid I 2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
Ten polyphenols were assessed for the supplemental effects on TC, LDL-C, TG, and HDL-C. aRated down for imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency.
c
Rated down for risk of bias. See Figures 2 and 3 for abbreviations.
2276 An et al JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022
Micronutrient Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Hemoglobin A1c I2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid 21 751/734 —0.03 [—0.15 to 0.08] 0.88 0.571 Lowa,c
L-arginine 7 247/246 —0.15 [—0.32 to 0.01] 0.52 0.843 Lowa,b
Folic acid 6 108/121 —0.06 [—0.27 to 0.15] 0.69 0.000 Moderatea
Vitamin C 15 355/360 —0.25 [—0.51 to 0.02] 0.90 0.053 Lowa,b
Vitamin D 27 1,604/1,591 —0.10 [—0.15 to —0.04] 0.94 0.613 Lowa,b
Vitamin E 9 225/232 —0.43 [—0.72 to —0.14] 0.79 0.081 Lowa,b
α-lipoic acid 7 227/237 —0.30 [—0.66 to 0.06] 0.83 0.781 Moderatea
Coenzyme Q10 8 182/184 —0.18 [—0.29 to —0.07] 0.00 0.324 Moderatea
Selenium 2 54/54 0.45 [—0.49 to 1.40] 0.70 - Moderatea
Magnesium 10 277/303 0.04 [—0.23 to 0.32] 0.51 0.077 Moderatea
Zinc 8 254/270 —0.56 [—0.97 to —0.16] 0.86 0.260 Very lowa,b,c
Anthocyanin 9 291/291 0.00 [—0.09 to 0.10] 0.78 0.711 Moderateb
Catechin 9 315/308 —0.12 [—0.23 to —0.02] 0.71 0.320 Lowb,c
Curcumin 7 266/266 —0.55 [—0.99 to —0.12] 0.81 0.181 Lowb,c
Flavanol 3 92/82 —0.10 [—0.40 to 0.20] 0.68 0.934 Moderateb
Isoflavone 5 73/74 —0.00 [—0.25 to 0.24] 0.26 0.309 Moderateb
Resveratrol 12 314/315 —0.06 [—0.16 to 0.05] 0.63 0.446 Moderateb
–1 –0.5 0 0.5 1 %
Micronutrient vs Control
Micronutrient Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Fasting Blood Glucose I2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid 34 987/1,033 0.08 [—1.33 to 1.49] 1.00 0.523 Moderatea
n-6 fatty acid 2 67/67 0.22 [—0.19 to 0.63] 0.74 - Lowa,c
L-arginine 10 362/359 —0.22 [—0.42 to —0.02] 0.80 0.078 Lowa,b
Folic acid 16 6,989/7,033 —0.07 [—0.15 to 0.00] 0 66 0.071 Lowa,b
Vitamin C 16 435/440 —0.45 [—0.96 to 0.05] 0.94 0.613 Lowa,b
Vitamin D 32 2,646/2,512 —0.12 [—0.23 to –0.02] 0.91 0.192 Lowa,b
Vitamin E 12 282/282 0.00 [—0.09 to 0.09] 0.00 - Moderatea
α-lipoic acid 7 223/211 —0.27 [—0.65 to 0.12] 0.96 0.161 Moderatea
Coenzyme Q10 9 216/207 —0.46 [—1.00 to 0.07] 0.86 0.407 Lowa,b
Melatonin 8 218/201 —0.11 [—0.30 to 0.08] 0.45 0.137 Moderatea
Selenium 6 184/184 0.02 [—0.59 to 0.63] 0.84 0.596 Moderatea
Magnesium 10 262/268 —0.22 [—0.52 to 0.07] 0.83 0.840 Moderatea
Zinc 20 598/628 —0.71 [—1.35 to —0.07] 0.99 0.020 Lowa,b
Anthocyanin 30 799/776 —0.09 [—0.17 to —0.02] 0.76 0.173 Lowb,c
Catechin 27 1,020/1,004 —0.10 [—0.17 to —0.03] 0.80 0.233 Lowb,c
Curcumin 12 419/425 —0.44 [—0.70 to —0.18] 0.77 0.147 Lowb,c
Flavanol 14 344/331 —0.19 [—0.33 to —0.05] 0.95 0.884 Lowb,c
Genistein 7 410/426 —0.44 [—0.52 to —0.37] 0.95 0.102 Lowb,c
Hesperidin 6 168/157 0.01 [—0.12 to O.14] 0.45 0.545 Moderateb
Isoflavone 12 496/520 —0.05 [—0.24 to 0.13] 0.76 0.216 Moderateb
Quercetin 10 330/324 —0.02 [—0.14 to 0.09] 0.88 0.791 Moderateb
Resveratrol 20 461/472 —2.66 [—5.54 to 0.22] 1.00 0.139 Lowb,c
Twenty-two micronutrients were assessed for the supplemental effects on hemoglobin A1C and fasting blood glucose. aRated down for
imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency. c
Rated down for risk of bias. See Figure 2 for abbreviations.
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2277
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Micronutrient Study N (Int/Con) WMD [95% CI] Fasting Blood Insulin I2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid 20 708/704 —4.99 [—21.94 to 11.97] 0.99 0.137 Moderatea
Twenty-one micronutrients were assessed for the supplemental effects on fasting blood insulin. aRated down for imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency. cRated
down for risk of bias. See Figure 2 for abbreviations.
[95% CI: 0.35% to 0.02%]) and FBG (0.46 mmol/L to 1.93 mm Hg]). For patients with dyslipidemia, a
[95% CI: 0.67 to 0.25 mmol/L]), blood lipids (TC median dose of 130 mg/d polyphenols (range
0.20 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.33 to 0.07 mmol/L]), TG 45-400 mg/d) improved blood lipids LDL-C
(0.27 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.46 to 0.07 mmol/L]), and (0.79 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.17 to 0.40 mmol/L]),
HDL–C (0.12 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.05 to 0.19 mmol/L]), HDL-C (0.19 mmol/L [95% CI: 0.14 to 0.25 mmol/L]),
and blood pressure (SBP 4.54 mm Hg [95% CI: 7.14 TC (0.77 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.27 to 0.28 mmol/L]),
2278
Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
An et al
F I G U R E 7 Effects of Polyphenol Supplementation Among Individuals With Different Cardiometabolic Health Profiles
146.5 1.38 –0.59 –0.61 –0.06 –0.00 0.09 –0.17 –0.13 –0.16 –5.32
Healthy
[6.5 to 20,000] [0.23 to 24] [–1.50 to 0.32] [–1.32 to 0.11] [–0.12 to –0.01] [–0.12 to 0.11] [0.03 to 0.14] [–0.32 to –0.02] [–0.36 to 0.10] [–0.28 to –0.05] [–9.02 to –1.62]
Postmenopausal 70 2.76 –0.85 –0.47 –0.12 –0.09 0.04 0.09 –0.10 –0.15 –4.77
Women [10 to 1,315] [0.92 to 36] [–1.68 to –0.02] [–1.02 to 0.08] [–0.38 to 0.14] [–0.35 to 0.17] [–0.05 to 0.13] [–0.08 to 0.26] [–0.31 to 0.10] [–0.35 to 0.05] [–10.98 to 1.45]
350 1.84 –2.18 –1.10 –0.03 0.03 –0.03 –0.04 0.06 2.21
Hypertension
[54 to 1,024] [0.46 to 6] [–3.78 to –0.57] [–2.10 to –0.10] [–0.17 to 0.10] [–0.07 to 0.13] [–0.08 to 0.03] [–0.17 to 0.10] [–0.20 to 0.31] [–2.96 to 7.39]
Overweight/ 270 2.76 –1.36 –0.74 –0.11 –0.14 0.05 –0.07 0.00 –0.04 –1.55
Obesity [1.65 to 3,000] [0.46 to 12] [–2.41 to –0.31] [–1.73 to 0.26] [–0.26 to 0.04] [–0.44 to 0.17] [0.00 to 0.09] [–0.17 to 0.03] [–0.06 to 0.06] [–0.08 to 0.00] [–3.19 to 0.08]
261.8 2 –4.54 –1.70 –0.20 –0.01 0.12 –0.27 –0.19 –0.46 –3.04
Pre–T2D/T2D
[25 to 1,344] [0.92 to 48] [–7.14 to –1.93] [–4.35 to 0.95] [–0.33 to –0.07] [–0.23 to 0.21] [0.05 to 0.19] [–0.46 to –0.07] [–0.35 to –0.02] [–0.67 to –0.25] [–7.20 to 1.12]
Metabolic 432 2.76 –1.12 –1.66 –0.15 –0.24 0.06 –0.18 0.04 –0.08 0.42
Syndrome [54 to 2,400] [0.69 to 12] [–3.39 to 1.16] [–3.89 to 0.58] [–0.32 to 0.01] [–0.41 to –0.06] [0.02 to 0.10] [–0.34 to –0.02] [–0.02 to 0.10] [–0.23 to 0.06] [–3.64 to 4.48]
Micronutrient Event Study N (Int/Con) Relative Risk [95% CI] I 2 Egger's Test GRADE Score
n-3 fatty acid All-cause mortality 23 70,508/70,438 0.97 [0.93 to 1.00] 0.28 0.696 Moderatea
CVD mortality 17 62,914/62,916 0.93 [0.88 to 0.97] 0.48 0.441 Moderatea
Arrhythmia 6 5,555/5,577 0.79 [0.65 to 0.96] 0.48 0.380 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 12 45,652/45,639 0.85 [0.78 to 0.92] 0.37 0.948 Moderatea
Stroke 8 41,191/41,181 1.06 [0.96 to 1.18] 0.00 0.013 Moderatea
Coronary heart disease 5 30,111/30,104 0.86 [0.80 to 0.93] 0.00 0.653 Moderatea
Type 2 diabetes 18 38,455/38,356 0.92 [0.85 to 0.99] 0.54 0.682 Moderatea
n-6 fatty acid Type 2 diabetes 2 1,046/1,041 1.99 [0.18 to 21.92] 0.00 - Moderatea
Folic acid All-cause mortality 10 12,792/12,788 0.89 [0.78 to 1.01] 0.23 0.342 Moderatea
CVD mortality 5 11,235/11,233 0.86 [0.65 to 1.13] 0.00 0.004 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 6 12,112/12,098 1.29 [0.93 to 1.80] 0.04 0.072 Moderatea
Stroke 7 12,268/12,257 0.84 [0.72 to 0.97] 0.00 0.706 Moderatea
Vitamin C All-cause mortality 4 8,020/7,984 1.02 [0.94 to 1.11] 0.00 0.311 Moderatea
CVD mortality 3 7,870/7,867 1.07 [0.92 to 1.25] 0.00 0.116 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 2 7,760/7,737 0.96 [0.81 to 1.14] 0.06 - Moderatea
Stroke 2 7,760/7,737 0.92 [0.78 to 1.09] 0.00 - Moderatea
Vitamin D All-cause mortality 63 34,056/33,909 0.99 [0.95 to 1.04] 0.00 0.281 Moderatea
CVD mortality 9 17,513/17,618 1.00 [0.85 to 1.18] 0.00 0.484 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 19 23,135/23,034 0.94 [0.84 to 1.06] 0.00 0.345 Moderatea
Stroke 16 23,172/22,943 1.09 [0.95 to 1.24] 0.00 0.163 Moderatea
Coronary heart disease 10 823/710 0.71 [0.29 to 1.69] 0.00 0.617 Moderatea
Vitamin E All-cause mortality 5 22,967/22,989 1.01 [0.96 to 1.06] 0.00 0.834 Moderatea
CVD mortality 5 22,967/22,956 1.00 [0.92 to 1.08] 0.00 0.076 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 5 22,967/22,989 1.00 [0.93 to 1.08] 0.00 0.516 Moderatea
Stroke 5 22,967/22,989 1.05 [0.95 to 1.16] 0.34 0.512 Moderatea
Type 2 diabetes 2 10,159/10,144 1.01 [0.88 to 1.15] 0.47 - Moderatea
β-carotene All-cause mortality 6 82,941/82,941 1.10 [1.05 to 1.15] 0.65 0.680 Lowa,b
CVD mortality 12 151,640/151,640 1.12 [1.06 to 1.18] 0.40 0.380 Lowa,b
Myocardial Infarction 7 93,272/93,272 0.99 [0.93 to 1.05] 0.02 0.428 Moderatea
Stroke 6 105,775/105,775 1.09 [1.01 to 1.17] 0.73 0.065 Lowa,b
Type 2 diabetes 4 22,704/27,736 0.98 [0.87 to 1.09] 0.00 0.205 Moderatea
Coenzyme Q10 All-cause mortality 7 904/923 0.68 [0.49 to 0.94] 0.00 0.347 Moderatea
Selenium All-cause mortality 12 22,118/20,820 0.96 [0.88 to 1.05] 0.00 0.890 Moderatea
CVD mortality 5 18,849/18,620 0.97 [0.83 to 1.14] 0.05 0.916 Moderatea
Myocardial Infarction 3 724/721 0.87 [0.59 to 1.30] 0.36 0.796 Moderatea
Stroke 3 18,444/18,453 1.06 [0.87 to 1.29] 0.00 0.412 Moderatea
Coronary heart disease 3 724/641 0.89 [0.64 to 1.23] 0.34 0.629 Moderatea
Eight micronutrients studied were assessed for the supplemental effects on all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, myocardial
infarction, stroke, and T2D events. aRated down for imprecision. bRated down for inconsistency. See Figures 1, 2, and 7 for other abbreviations.
and TG (0.53 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.00 to 0.06 mmol/ 2.18 mm Hg [95% CI: 3.78 to 0.57 mm Hg] and DBP
L]) and blood glucose (FBG 0.19 mmol/L [95% CI: 1.10 mm Hg [95% CI: 2.10 to 0.10 mm Hg]). Lastly,
0.24 to 0.13 mmol/L]). For patients with hyper- a median dose of 432 mg/d polyphenols (range
tension, a median dose of 350 mg/d polyphenols 54-2,400 mg/d) improved the blood lipid profile of
(range 54-1,024 mg/d) decreased blood pressure (SBP patients with metabolic syndrome (LDL-C 0.24
2280
F I G U R E 9 An Evidence-Based Map of Micronutrient Supplementation on Cardiometabolic Health
n-3 2 g/d [0.28-9.50 g/d] 3 [0.69-60] 1.8 g/d [0.27-5.5 g/d] 2 [0.5-7.4]
Fatty Acid n-6 4.25 g/d [1-20 g/d] 2.07 [0.69-24] 2 g/d [1.9-5.5 g/d] 3.33 [1-3.33]
Folic Acid 5 mg [0.25-15 mg] 1.84 [0.23-53.85] 3 mg/d [0.5-15 g/d] 3.25 [1-8]
Vitamin C 500 mg/d [50-3,000 mg/d] 1.84 [0.33-60] 500 mg/d [500-500 mg/d] 7.6 [3.0-9.4]
1,400 mg/d
Vitamin Vitamin C + E 3 [1.84-5.52]
[300-1,400 mg/d]
Vitamin E 400 mg/d [3-1,800 mg/d] 2 [0.69-72] 400 mg/d [50-600 mg/d] 7.5 [3.6-10]
Mineral Selenium 200 μg/d [100-960 μg/d] 2.76 [1.38-6] 200 μg/d [100-200 μg/d] 3.5 [0.5-7.6]
Cardiometabolic
Direction Evidence Quality
Health
Decrease Benefit High Quality
The effects of 27 antioxidants on blood pressure, blood lipids, blood glucose, all-cause mortality, CVD risks, and type 2 diabetes risk were summarized. Specific micronutrient supplementation doses and intervention durations
based on the evidence were provided. See Figures 1 and 2 for abbreviations.
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2281
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
Cardiometabolic
Effects of Antioxidant Micronutrient on Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Events Direction Health
Cardiovascular Decrease Benefit
All-Cause Disease Myocardial Coronary Type 2
Micronutrient Mortality Infarction Stroke Heart Disease Arrhythmia Diabetes
Mortality Increase Benefit
n-3 Increase Harm
Fatty acid
n-6
Unchanged Neutral
Folic acid
β-carotene
Low Quality
Antioxidant
supplement
Coenzyme Q10 Very Low Quality
Evidence-based maps summarizing 256 meta-analyses of 884 randomized controlled trials investigating the interventional effects of 27 antioxidant micronutrients on
cardiovascular disease risk factors (top) and cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes events (bottom) according to the direction of causation, effect, and evidence
quality.
[95% CI: 0.41 to 0.06 mmol/L], HDL-C 0.06 mmol/L supplementation on CVD events (Figure 8). In a me-
[95% CI: 0.02 to 0.10 mmol/L], and TG 0.18 mmol/L dian duration of 3-year intervention, 27,823 all-cause
[95% CI: 0.34 to 0.02 mmol/L]). mortality events, 15,593 CVD mortality events, 11,202
EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SUPPLEMENTATION MIs, 8,276 strokes, 2,656 coronary heart disease
ON CLINICAL CVD AND T2D EVENTS. Eight micro- events, and 409 arrhythmia events were recorded in
nutrients studied were assessed for effects of 804,955 individuals. Supplementation of coenzyme
2282 An et al JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022
Q10 (median dose 50 mg/d; range 33.3-100 mg/d) personalized combinations of these nutrients (Central
reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49- Illustration).
0.94) in 7 trials performed in heart failure patients. Previously, several systematic reviews have re-
A median dose of 1.8 g/d (range 0.27-5.5 g/d) n-3 fat- ported inconsistent findings regarding the effects of
ty acid reduced the risks of CVD mortality (RR: 0.93; different nutrients on clinical outcomes such as
95% CI: 0.88-0.97), MI (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.92), mortality or major cardiovascular events.23-26 The
and coronary heart disease (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80- current study represents the first attempt in
0.93). Folic acid supplementation (median dose 3 mg/ providing a comprehensive and most up-to-date evi-
d; range 0.5-15 mg/d) reduced the risk of stroke (RR: dence map that systematically assessed the quality
0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97). Vitamin C, vitamin D, and quantity of all RCTs linking the effects of a wide
vitamin E, and selenium supplementation showed no variety of micronutrients on CVD risk factors, and
effect on CVD events. In contrast, a median dose of clinical CVD and T2D outcomes. The pooled effects of
20 mg/d b-carotene (range 6-50 mg/d) increased the polyphenol intake on individuals with various car-
risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), diometabolic health profiles were also assessed, with
CVD mortality (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18), and stroke special emphasis on the quality of evidence that
(RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17). could guide their clinical application for the preven-
n-3 fatty acid, n-6 fatty acid, vitamin E, and tion and control of CVD risk. For high-risk in-
b-carotene were assessed for the effects of supple- dividuals, supplementation of n-3 fatty acid and folic
mentation on T2D risk reduction. A total of 4,058 acid seemed to have significant benefits for reducing
cases of T2D occurred in 134,368 individuals during a both CVD risk factors and CVD risks,25,27,28 and evi-
median 2-year intervention; however, there was no dence from a meta-analysis study favors the supple-
clinically significant effect on T2D incidence. mentation of eicosapentaenoic acid alone rather than
A COMPREHENSIVE EVIDENCE-BASED MAP. We the combination with docosahexaenoic acid for CVD
reviewed a total of 256 meta-analyses reporting on prevention.27 The current updated meta-analysis
the effects of a wide variety of micronutrients on supports the notion that a median dose of 1.8 g/d n-
blood pressure, blood lipids, blood glucose, all-cause 3 fatty acid may have the optimal benefit in lowering
mortality, CVD risks, and T2D risk. According to the risk of MI, coronary heart disease, and CVD mortality,
magnitudes and directions, we provided a summary probably through improving TG and HDL levels.
of effects as either “benefit,” “harm,” or “neutral,” Similarly, n-6 fatty acid supplementation improved
and the evidence quality as high/moderate/low/very TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C, but there were insufficient
low (Figure 9). The evidence was graded as high for data to assess an effect on the risk of CVD. Because
3.13% (n ¼ 8), moderate for 74.61% (n ¼ 191), low for folic acid, L -arginine, and L -citrulline are directly
21.09% (n ¼ 54), and very low for 1.17% (n ¼ 3) of all involved in nitric oxide production, these micro-
meta-analyses. According to the benefits on CVD nutrients have been shown to help maintain vaso-
events and risk factors, n-3 fatty acid (3 events and dilation and/or redox balance in the cardiovascular
2 risk factors), folic acid (1 event and 7 risk factors), system.15 Consistent with previous reports linking
and coenzyme Q10 (1 event and 3 risk factors) ranked folic acid supplementation to decreased stroke and
top for CVD prevention. Improved effects on multiple total CVD risk in high-risk populations, 24-26 the cur-
CVD risk factors were observed in genistein (6 risk rent meta-analysis also indicated that folic acid
factors), zinc (5 risk factors), anthocyanin (5 risk supplementation improved blood pressure, blood
factors), curcumin (5 risk factors), flavanol (4 risk lipids, and blood glucose and reduced MI risk in
factors), L-arginine (4 risk factors), magnesium (4 risk diverse populations. These and other published re-
factors), n-6 fatty acid (3 risk factors), and a -lipoic sults support the recommendation of folic acid
acid (3 risk factors). In contrast, b-carotene supple- supplementation for CVD prevention, particularly in
mentation increased the risks of 3 CVD events, and countries or regions where folic acid fortification is
n-9 fatty acid increased the level of TG. not implemented.
In 7 trials of coenzyme Q10 supplementation in
DISCUSSION heart failure patients, there seemed to be some ben-
efits in reducing total mortality. However, there were
Our systematic assessment and quantification of mul- insufficient data to assess its effect on CVD events.
tiple differential effects of a wide variety of micro- Further trials directly assessing its clinical efficacy on
nutrients and phytochemicals on cardiometabolic lipids, glucose, and blood pressures along with clin-
health indicate that an optimal nutritional strategy to ical CVD outcomes are warranted. In contrast,
promote cardiometabolic health will likely involve b -carotene supplementation was found to increase
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2283
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
stroke and CVD mortality risks in this analysis, and the diversity of intervention substances used in
consistent with previous work linking supplementa- these trials. In the current study, intervention sub-
tion of $30 mg/d b -carotene to increased all-cause stances were restricted to relatively pure phyto-
mortality.29 The harmful effect of serum b-carotene chemical supplements. Nevertheless, we urge
levels on CVD risk was recently reported in patients caution regarding the interpretation of findings
with T2D, in whom higher serum b-carotene levels linking the cardiovascular benefits of isoflavones
were associated with increased CVD mortality in a from polyphenol-rich foods as we cannot separate
dose-dependent manner during an average 14 years the influences of other co-ingested substances in fi-
of follow-up. 30 In several trials investigating the bers, proteins, or minerals. Fourth, the effect of
interventional effect of b-carotene, vitamin E and/or antioxidant mixture was not assessed. Some micro-
vitamin C were investigated in parallel with b-caro- nutrients may be needed in combination to be
tene. Vitamin E seemed to decrease A1C but showed effective, such as selenium. In contrast to antioxi-
no effect on CVD and T2D risk. Vitamin C supple- dant mixture without selenium, supplementation of
mentation seemed to increase HDL-C, but no effect antioxidant mixture with selenium reduced CVD and
was found on CVD risks. Although there were insuf- all-cause mortality risks.43 Fifth, due to insufficient
ficient data to assess the effect of vitamin C on T2D, RCTs, some micronutrients were not included in
results from the Women’s Antioxidant Cardiovascular current analysis. For example, copper and manga-
Study indicated that vitamin C supplementation had nese, which form part of the endogenous antioxi-
no effect on T2D risk during a median follow-up of dant system together with zinc and selenium (ie,
9.2 years.31 superoxide dismutases and glutathione peroxi-
Very few studies investigated polyphenol supple- dases), were not included. Finally, the median dose
mentation for the prevention of CVDs or T2D. In of included RCTs does not correspond to an optimal
the COSMOS trial, flavanol-enriched cocoa extract dose for clinical effects. For instance, the median
was shown to reduce CVD mortality during 3.6 years’ intervention dose of folic acid (5 mg/d) in included
follow-up (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98). 21 The cur- trials is much higher than the recommended dose of
rent meta-analysis supports the cardiometabolic 0.4 mg/d, which could reach 90% of folic acid’s
benefits of polyphenol supplementation. Others have maximal reduction effect on plasma homocysteine.44
also found cardiometabolic improvement effects of In certain situations, antioxidant micronutrients
anthocyanin, 32 catechin,33,34 curcumin,35 flavanol,36 may be harmful (eg, b-carotene supplementation
genistein,37 and quercetin.38,39 We observed that increased lung cancer risk in smokers).45 Thus, spe-
resveratrol supplementation decreased SBP and DBP cific antioxidant supplementation doses and inter-
in the current meta-analysis, which was inconclusive vention durations are another important
in a previously published meta-analysis that consideration before generalizing these results to
included patients with severe cardiometabolic-based other populations in which different dietary patterns
chronic diseases. 40 In contrast to previous meta-an- predominantly exist in various populations globally.
alyses,41,42 isoflavone supplementation was shown Any whole food–based recommendations regarding
to have no influence on blood pressure or blood dietary patterns that incorporate these evidence-
lipids. based micronutrient supplementation doses
STUDY LIMITATIONS. First, some of the intervention will need proper cultural adaptation and
trials had short durations (eg, <1 month), chal- then validation.46
lenging any simple inference for a long-term impact
on CVD risk factors. Second, low-quality evidence CONCLUSIONS
accounted for >20% of the meta-analyses included,
highlighting the importance for better design and Supplementation of some but not all micronutrients
execution of future trials; after excluding those may benefit cardiometabolic health outcomes in
studies, however, much of the main findings per- diverse populations. The comprehensive evidence
sisted, affirming the robustness of the evidence. map presented here highlights the importance of
Third, there was a relative paucity of trial data micronutrient diversity and the balance of benefits
investigating the effects of micronutrients on the and risks in the design of whole food–based dietary
incidence of CVDs or T2D, especially for poly- patterns to promote cardiometabolic health, which
phenols. Fourth, several inconsistencies existed in may require cultural adaptations to apply globally.
the updated results with previous meta-analysis due The micronutrients identified require further valida-
to different inclusion criteria. This inconsistency tion in large, high-quality interventional trials to
may simply be due to the different inclusion criteria establish clinical efficacy (eg, the COSMOS trial20,21,47)
2284 An et al JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022
to determine their long-term balance of risks and the advisory boards of Aveta.Life, L-Nutra, and Twin Health. All other
authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the
benefits. Future trials that adopt emerging novel
contents of this paper to disclose.
cardiovascular biomarkers that reflect the whole
spectrum of lipid oxidation, endothelial function, and
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Dr Simin Liu,
cardiovascular risk are also warranted to improve
Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Box
mechanistic understandings.
G-S121-2, 121 South Main Street, Providence, Rhode
Island 02912, USA. E-mail: simin_liu@brown.edu. OR
FUNDING SUPPORT AND AUTHOR DISCLOSURES Dr Fazheng Ren, Department of Nutrition and Health,
China Agricultural University, No. 10 Tianxiu Road,
This work was partly supported by the United States’ Fulbright Pro-
Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China. E-mail:
gram where S.L. was a Fulbright Distinguished Chair in Global Health
2019-2020, and this work was supported by the Beijing Advanced renfazheng@cau.edu.cn.
Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, the Na-
tional Natural Science Foundation of China (31970717, 82170429), the PERSPECTIVES
Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2020TC015), and the Beijing
Municipal Natural Science Foundation (7222111). Dr Liu has received
consulting payments and honoraria or promises of the same for sci- COMPETENCY IN MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE:
entific presentations or reviews at numerous venues, including but Micronutrients confer differential effects on cardio-
not limited to Johns Hopkins University, Fred Hutchinson Cancer
metabolic outcomes, but dietary therapies incorpo-
Center, Harvard University, University of Buffalo, Guangdong Gen-
eral Hospital, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, rating micronutrients must balance benefits and risks.
and the National Institutes of Health; is a member of the Data Safety
and Monitoring Board for several trials, including the SELECT (Sem- TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK: Whole food–based
aglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Over- diets to promote cardiometabolic health require
weight or Obesity) trial sponsored by Novo Nordisk and a trial of
personalized combinations of a variety of micronu-
pulmonary hypertension in diabetes patients sponsored by Massa-
chusetts General Hospital; and has received royalties from UpToDate; trients that require validation in clinical trials to
and has received an honorarium from the American Society for establish long-term efficacy in diverse populations.
Nutrition for his duties as Associate Editor. Dr Mechanick has
received honoraria from Abbott Nutrition for lectures; and serves on
REFERENCES
1. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators. Health effects of 7. Huang Q, Braffett BH, Simmens SJ, Young HA, 14. Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, et al. Dietary
dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a sys- Ogden CL. Dietary polyphenol intake in US adults intake and blood concentrations of antioxidants
tematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease and 10-year trends: 2007-2016. J Acad Nutr Diet. and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer,
Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393:1958–1972. 2020;120:1821–1833. and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and
dose-response meta-analysis of prospective
2. Mechanick JI, Farkouh ME, Newman JD, 8. Brauchla M, Dekker MJ, Rehm CD. Trends in
studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108:1069–1091.
Garvey WT. Cardiometabolic-based chronic dis- Vitamin C consumption in the United States: 1999-
ease, adiposity and dysglycemia drivers: JACC 2018. Nutrients. 2021;13:420. 15. Varadharaj S, Kelly OJ, Khayat RN, Kumar PS,
State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. Ahmed N, Zweier JL. Role of dietary antioxidants
9. Kim K, Vance TM, Chun OK. Estimated intake
2020;75:525–538. in the preservation of vascular function and the
and major food sources of flavonoids among US
modulation of health and disease. Front Cardiovasc
3. Mechanick JI, Farkouh ME, Newman JD, adults: changes between 1999-2002 and 2007-
Med. 2017;4:64.
Garvey WT. Cardiometabolic-based chronic dis- 2010 in NHANES. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55:833–843.
ease, addressing knowledge and clinical practice 16. de Baaij JHF, Hoenderop JGJ, Bindels RJM.
gaps: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll 10. Blasbalg TL, Hibbeln JR, Ramsden CE, Magnesium in man: implications for health and
Cardiol. 2020;75:539–555. Majchrzak SF, Rawlings RR. Changes in consump- disease. Physiol Rev. 2015;95:1–46.
tion of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in the
4. Mechanick JI, Kushner RF. Lifestyle Medicine, A United States during the 20th century. Am J Clin 17. Tribble DL, AHA Science Advisory. Antioxidant
Manual for Clinical Practice. In: Mechanick JI, Nutr. 2011;93:950–962. consumption and risk of coronary heart disease:
Kushner RF, eds. Lifestyle Medicine, A Manual for emphasis on vitamin C, vitamin E, and beta-
Clinical Practice. Springer; 2016:1–8. 11. Kim K, Vance TM, Chun OK. Greater total carotene: a statement for healthcare pro-
antioxidant capacity from diet and supplements is fessionals from the American Heart Association.
5. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Vadiveloo M, et al.
associated with a less atherogenic blood profile in Circulation. 1999;99:591–595.
2021 Dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular
U.S. adults. Nutrients. 2016;8:15.
health: a scientific statement from the American 18. Beckman JA, Paneni F, Cosentino F,
Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144:e472– 12. Yang M, Chung S-J, Chung CE, et al. Estimation Creager MA. Diabetes and vascular disease:
e487. of total antioxidant capacity from diet and sup- pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and
plements in US adults. Br J Nutr. 2011;106:254– medical therapy: part II. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:
6. Belardo D, Michos ED, Blankstein R, et al.
263. 2444–2452.
Practical, evidence-based approaches to nutri-
tional modifications to reduce atherosclerotic 13. Michos ED, Cainzos-Achirica M, Heravi AS, 19. Levitan EB, Song Y, Ford ES, Liu S. Is nondia-
cardiovascular disease: an American Society for Appel LJ. Vitamin D, calcium supplements, and betic hyperglycemia a risk factor for cardiovascu-
Preventive Cardiology Clinical Practice Statement. implications for cardiovascular health: JACC Focus lar disease?: a meta-analysis of prospective
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022;10:100323. Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:437–449. studies. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:2147–2155.
JACC VOL. 80, NO. 24, 2022 An et al 2285
DECEMBER 13, 2022:2269–2285 Micronutrients to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
20. Sesso HD, Rist PM, Aragaki AK, et al. Multivi- primary prevention trials. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:27– profiles and inflammatory markers among patients
tamins in the prevention of cancer and cardio- 39. with metabolic syndrome and related disorders: a
vascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and systematic review and meta-analysis of random-
30. Qiu Z, Chen X, Geng T, et al. Associations of
Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) ran- ized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci. 2019;60:
serum carotenoids with risk of cardiovascular
domized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;115: 1855–1868.
mortality among individuals with type 2 diabetes:
1501–1510.
results from NHANES. Diabetes Care. 2022;45: 40. Fogacci F, Tocci G, Presta V, Fratter A,
21. Sesso HD, Manson JE, Aragaki AK, et al. Effect 1453–1461. Borghi C, Cicero AFG. Effect of resveratrol on
of cocoa flavanol supplementation for the pre- 31. Song Y, Cook NR, Albert CM, Denburgh MV,
blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-
vention of cardiovascular disease events: the CO- analysis of randomized, controlled, clinical trials.
Manson JE. Effects of vitamins C and E and b-
coa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study Crit Rev Food Sci. 2018;59:1–14.
carotene on the risk of type 2 diabetes in women
(COSMOS) randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr. at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a random- 41. Qin Y, Niu K, Zeng Y, et al. Isoflavones for
2022;115:1490–1500. ized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90: hypercholesterolaemia in adults. Cochrane Data-
22. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. 429–437. base Syst Rev. 2013;6:CD009518.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review 32. Yang L, Ling W, Du Z, et al. Effects of antho- 42. Liu XX, Li SH, Chen JZ, et al. Effect of soy
and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: cyanins on cardiometabolic health: a systematic isoflavones on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of
elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349: review and meta-analysis of randomized randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Car-
g7647. controlled trials. Adv Nutr. 2017;8:684–693. diovasc Dis. 2012;22:463–470.
23. O’Connor EA, Evans CV, Ivlev I, et al. Vitamin 33. Zheng X-X, Xu Y-L, Li S-H, Hui R, Wu Y-J, 43. Jenkins DJA, Kitts D, Giovannucci EL, et al.
and mineral supplements for the primary preven- Huang X-H. Effects of green tea catechins with or Selenium, antioxidants, cardiovascular disease,
tion of cardiovascular disease and cancer: updated without caffeine on glycemic control in adults: a and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and
evidence report and systematic review for the US meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am
Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2022;327: J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:750–762. J Clin Nutr. 2020;112:1642–1652.
2334.
34. Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jamshidi A, Nikbakht- 44. Homocysteine Lowering Trialists’ Collabora-
24. Jenkins DJA, Spence JD, Giovannucci EL, et al. Nasrabadi E, Khosravi-Boroujeni H. Green tea tion. Dose-dependent effects of folic acid on
Supplemental vitamins and minerals for cardiovas- catechins and blood pressure: a systematic review blood concentrations of homocysteine: a meta-
cular disease prevention and treatment: JACC Focus and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. analysis of the randomized trials. Am J Clin Nutr.
Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:423–436. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53:1299–1311. 2005;82:806–812.