Agricluture Sidlab

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1

Table 1: Literature Review

Reference Description Contribution

Xie et al 2018 Multi-level learning features for automatic classification of The classification model in this paper used multi-level
[5] field crop pests. A large dataset of 40 categories of pests learning features on 40 species of pests which gave
with high quality was labeled by agricultural experts. outstanding results for the pest classification.

Martineau et, This survey paper investigates forty-four studies on The dataset is fixed so, the singularity regarding
al., 2016 [6] Entomology and tries to offer a big picture of what are the pattern recognition and image analysis remains
scientific locks and how the problem was deployed. Help unsure.
taken from the papers is adopted on image capture, feature
extraction, classification methods, and datasets.

Wang et. al., A new automatic identification system of insect images at Results from tests on nine common orders and sub-
[7] the order level. In this paper, seven features are used as orders with an ANN, the system performed with good
basic geometrical features for automatic identification as stability and accuracy achieving 93%. But the SVM
well as insect taxonomy and morphology. achieved more accurate and better results.

Thenmozhi The transfer learning technology helped fine-tune the pre- Results of this paper showed that for the classification
and Reddy, trained models to reduce the difficulty of model training. of various types of insects in field crops the proposed
2019 [8] Crop pest classification based on deep convolutional neural CNN model is effective than pre-trained models and
network and transfer learning. For three distinct datasets of its practical application is possible in agricultural
pests, classification was improved. departments for crop protection.

Li et. al., [9] The few-shot learning method reduced the requirements for The outcome of this paper achieved accuracy of
the scale of the training dataset. Few-shot cotton pest 95.4% and 96.2% for the two datasets. This work
recognition and terminal realization need a few raw training claims to combine the software and hardware for the
data. An embedded terminal runs the few-shot recognition landing of intelligent algorithms in the agricultural
system with effectiveness. Robustness is ensured with applications.
CNN feature extractor which is trained by triplet loss.

Li et. al., 2020 The dataset in this study has been taken from the open The average detection accuracy for
[10] source that has the important insects and pests’ images in The proposed model attained the average detection
agriculture sector with natural scenes and complicated accuracy more than 98%. The fine-tuned GoogLeNet
background very close to the world in reality. Crop pest model acquired an improvement of 6.22% compared
recognition in natural scenes using convolutional neural to the state-of-the-art method.
networks. In this paper the dataset of crop pest which is
shared is collected and validated manually. A fine-tuned
GoogLeNet model is used in this paper for the
identification and classification of 10 crop pests’ types.

Liu et. al., Localization and Classification of Paddy Field Pests using a For tests DCNN has been applied for pest control of a
2016 [11] Saliency Map and Deep Convolutional Neural Network. In paddy field, it has reduced the runtime and high mean
this paper authors used the pipeline of both localization Accuracy Precision (mAP) has attained. Use of
and classification which was not used previously and so unlabeled new samples for updating the model
it’s their main contribution in this paper to report this parameters in the field could be possible by
strategy for a pest insect classification task. implementing online learning. In this design there is
the difficulty in interpretation of overlapping object
which is a challenge that is needed to be addressed
for practical application.

You might also like