Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

F

Ti'cnsI ati on f brm Ramanian


ttllll!!rlaatllllltaallaaa-traalalllrllrltltltltltatttllrlttlllttlalttttlaltltl

Code:F-PG-5.10-01
URBAAi
INCO
lNcERfi
MINISTRYOF REC:ONALDEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM
National Institute for Researchand Developmentin ConstructionoUrtran Planningand
SustainableSpatialDevelopment"URBAN-INCERC'
266 Sos.PantelimonStreet.421652,District2, Bucharest,
Phoneno.: 021.255.02.70; Fax no.:
021.255.18.52;Fax no.: 021.255
.00.62;E-mail:U$gl":i{U.crq(!ilrAqd.re,
ryryurincd.r'o

RESEARCHAND TESTLABORATORY
FIRE SAFETY OF CONSTRACTIONS

I STD E GREE CERT-IT.


I ED LAB ORATORY
I.S.C.LICENSE No. 2134 / I 3 September2010

INCD "URBAN-INCERC"GeneralManager
VasileMeita,AssociateProfessor,
PhD,Architect Official Se.tl
[Illegibte SignatureJ

Contract:528T12012

TEST REPORT no. 32 / 03 December2012

D eterm in stia n oJ'.fire r esistuncefo r non-lo ad-bet r ing eIements

l. Name of item to be tested:fire resistantself'-supporling


wall SIPPANEL type.
2. Customer'sname:S.C.SIPPANELTECHNOLOGIES S.R,L.Bucharest.
3. Customer'saddress:16G-ralEremiaGrigorescuStreet,District I .
4. Identificationof speciiicationor test procedure:
?he determinationwas perfomed in accordance with StandardSR EN 1363-1:2001-Parl1:
Generalrequirements. SR EN 1364-1:2002Fire-resistance testsof non-load-bearing
elements.
Part l: Walls,andin compliancewith thetechnicalexecution procedurePTE-FOC-01.02.
5. Descriptionand identificationof the item under testing:
The self-supporting wall is madeof two magnesiumoxide plates,with a thickncssof 12.5mm
anda coreof Elastoporpolyurethane foamwith a thicknessof 125mm. The totalthicknessof the
testspecimen is 150mm. The dimensions of the wall undertestingwere:3,000(L) X 3,000(l)
mm.
The const:uctiondetailsprovidedby the manufacturerarepresentedin Appendix7 - fig. 9.
Specimencode:32712012
6. Date of receiptof the item beingtested:
Accordingto theprotocolcodeF-PC-5.8-01 dated30 November2012
7.Dateof test:03DecemberZAI2
8. Descriptionof samplingprocedure:
The samplingwascaried out by the Customer.
Testreportno. 32 / 03 December2012
Copyno.: B/3
P a s e1 o f 1 6
v1

TransLationform Romanian
ll::arrllrrtll:allttfttl:lllrrrtrrrrrirrrlr.rrr'a!:rrltttrarlfrltrllrrrl:rtrttl:t

9. Resultsobtained:

Storageconditions:
During storage,lhetest qpesimenwas.maintainedat an arnbienttemperatureof 23 * 10 "C and a
relativehumidityof 50 + l0%.

Bearing conditions:
The sfeclqen.yas in the ovenopsilingwith all edgessimply supported.The edgeshave
fortted
beensealedwith mineralwool.

Testingconditions:
The environmentalconditionsin thetestingroom bsforebeginningthe test:
Relativeair humidiff lu/ol Ambientair temporature["C]
71.7 10.0

- Dle to a fault, Te2 andTe7 thermocouples, positionedwithin tho oven,as shownin FIG. 1, do
not fimction.This.ddesnot affectthe quality of the test,nor the quality of the resultsobtained.

Table I

Miaute Commentson the unexposedsurfaceof the specimen,during the test


0 Test start
I All bumers switch on
18 Thespecimenis within thelimits of thestandard;
Averageintemaltemperatur.e of theovenis T :637 "C;
"ouo*
30 Thereis a slisht releaseof smokefrom in top of the specimen;(seephoto2)
48 The testcontinuesunderstandard conditions;
The specimenmaintainsits performance criteriawithin the limits of the standardl
The specimendoesnot show sign:ificantdeformation
The averagetemperature in the ovenis Tuu"*n.:715 oC;
62 The temperaturesfrom the unexposedsideare slowly growing;
78 Thecolorof thesmoketumsyellowishwhite;(seephoto3)
89 The amountof smokeemittedincreases;
(seephoto4)
The color of the smoketurns.yellowish-brown;,
The specimenno longermeetsthetightnessperformaneecriteria;(seephoto 5)
The maximumtemperaturerecordedon the unexposedsurfaceis Err*",: 94"C'.

Testreport no. i2 / 03 December2Al2


Copyno,: 8/3
Page2of16
E
Ir iI
:

Tr anslati on fo rm Roman ian


rrrrrrtrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..l.iri'I..1';.-.;;.;;;;-;;;rrrrtrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..rrl

Remarks:
The conformity of the specimenwas verified before and after the test for checking the
construction details provided by the manufacturer.The specimen inspection consisted of
checkingthe overalldimensionsandits thickness.
The construction of the self-supporting
wall is symmetric.
Durirg the test,the specimendoes showsignificantdeformationagainstits original shape.
not
The smokeemittedis chokinganddifficult to breathe.

. This report detailsthe method'afconstruction,the testconditionsand resultsobtainedwhenthe


speefficcanstructionelernentdescribedhere was testedaccordingto thepraceduredescribedin
EN 1363-1andEN 1363-2,as appropriate.Anyvariation on size,constructionaldetails,Ioads,
unitary .forces,shape or end condittonsother than thosepermitted under the direct scope
aceordingto the appropriatetestmethod,is not thesubiectof this report."

, Due to the nahue of fire resistance test and, therefore,the dfficulty to quqntifi the fire
resistancerneasurementuncertainty,it is not possible to, specif! the accuracy degree of the
result.

. Thetest report may not be reproduced,partia[ly and / or fully, without the written approyal of
the laborutory that performed the test.Appendix I, Appendix 2, Appendix 3, Appendix 4,
Appendix 5, Appendix 6. Appendix 7 are part of this testrepart.

. This testresult relatesonly to the ilem subjectto testing.

The resultsobtainedfollowing the test:


TableZ
No. Normalive reference Performancecriteria Testresults

I Tightness Cotton cartonization 89


The performance
criterion is not
lost
2 Penetration of a device for 89
SREN 1363-1:
2001 measuring holes The performance
SREN T364* 2AW criterion is not
lost
J The occurrence of supported 89
flame The performance
criterion is not
lost
4 Insulation Average temperature increase 89
of morethan 140oC againstthe The perfornance
initial averagetemperature criterion is not
lost
Testreport no. 32 / 03 Deeember2012
Copyno.: 8/3
Page3 of16
Ft
ti i 4

Tran,slation for m Romanian


rtlrlrfrr!rrrrrarrrrrrtrrrrrrrlrrrrlrt"tlrrlrrrrltrttrrrrrlrrrrrrtttrrrlrrrrrrra

5 Temperature increase in any 89


point of more than 180 "C The performance
against the initial average criterion is not
temperature lost

The Tightnessperformancecriterion is lost in the minute 89 by failing to meetthe performance


sub-criteria t'Occurrenceof supportedflame" and "Penetration of a devicefor measuring
holes",whenthe averagetemperature recordedon theunexposed sideof the self-supporting wall
is of 59 "C.
TheInsulationperformance criterionshouldbe considered automatically not met if the tightness
criterionceunes to be met.

Approvedby,
CeneralMangerINCERCBucharest Subsidiary
ClaudiuMatei,Engineer
Illlegible Signature]

Checkedby, Preparedby,
Headof Laboratory OctavianLalu
LapadBubulete,Engineer flilegible SignatureJ
IIllegible SignatureJ

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012


Copyno.: 8/3
Page4 of 16
!f

Tr&nslati onform Romanian


:att,:rtlt.tttl.t:':rll:ltllltrrrrtlr'aarr,itrtrrra:a:lllr,la:lrrri:ll:lltlllrrarlrrrrlr

AppendixL of thetestroport no.32/ 03December2012

Layoutof thernocouples

within the ovenis shownin Fig. 1.


t. the layout of thermocouples
2. Thelayoutof thermocouples on theunexposed surfbceis shownin Fig. 2.
'gl
i 'r.'o'
E1'l E14 E
6t ^ u
Te2 l'1.
I
EsISg:g \u'rI
\ o"q{5. \!915 EJ2J \EJe/,.

II
'.rl trz
K F
Te3 Ta4
a
l. i6
?
\..
s9
/'
E
t
res I Te6 \ssg
m'I
E4

Tb7
I
I Te8
N E.
\
B & \

0.s 1 0,9 t9 1,2 0.9

FiE.l Fip 2
Positioningaf thermocouples Positioningof thermocouples
on the
insidethe oven unexposedsideof the specimen

Remarks:

- Tel-Te8- represents the thermocouples


mountedinsidethe oven;
- Er-Ers* represents the fhermocouples
rnountedon the unexposedsurfaceof the specimen;
- Er& - representsthe theffnocouplesto recordthe averagetemperatureincreaseon the surface
unexposed to the fire action;
- Ee-Ers- reprcserlts
the thermocouplesto recordthe maximumtemperatureincreaseon the
unexposed
surface to theactionof fire;
- Dimensionsaregivenin meters.

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012


Copyno.: 8/3
Page5 of16
A ,::.:.
I!1
1 ,,':
i

, Translation farrn Romanian


tr:rl,fLt.r;ltltflrrt-rtlt:altrlalrrr'arirr:flarllrrrirrlrrtrrrrrrtrrlrlllrlrrrrrr

Appendix2 of the testreport no.32/ 03December2012

Recordsof the tvmperaturein the measqringareason the unexposedsurfacethroughoutthe test

Table3 indicatesthemoasured valueson the surfaceunexposed


temperature to theaotionof fire,
of the specimen,accordingto the positioning of the thermocouplesin Figure 2.

Table 3
'r:1 8? E3 E4 Is ES E7 af s9 Els, 811 E1? t113' 814 815
TlE.
lniol fec lucl ec :?. fl{:1 I'Cl rfofll: Pcl rer fi€r ioc: .IJC] fcl ftI i,oc'l
0 iI 10 l1 tCI 11 10 il 1S IO IO t0 1 0 r0 1t
i8 l4 i-) t4 LA IQ LI t8 19 ltt \7 18 tn t7 I8
30 16 r9 l8 20 r9 24 ?9 tR .44 45 J0. 37 38 JO 4'7
48 40 4A
38 4A 4l 38 4fi sri 47 66 44 56 -55 49
62 55 <A 4[, 47 <o. .-60. 111 59 6? .r{O: 53 60 58
7& 58 59 0t 5i {6 6l 62, 70 tll; 77 64 .69 '/0 64
59 '14. '7A
89 59 6{ b4 6l .64 A< 73 4 78 a1

The maximumtemperatureon the unexposedside,in minute'89,is recordedby thermocouple811

Testreport no. 32 / 03 Deeember2Aft


Copyno.: 8/3
Page6 oftr6
rl
ll'!

TransIati on .form Romani an


aiiarlflrrtrr.,trrr.r.lr.rtlral--arrr'rlrrrirltrrrrltrrrrlt'trr:ftr.:tl:.lllaarttlralttt

Temlrerat'ureevolution on the surfaeo:unexposed


to the action of fire

+E:

-=.f4

**i6

-':*[8
,-,-e!

+-- Sl?
..*,,: lt).ti

....--tr;

Fig.3

Graphicrecordingof the temperaturein the measuringareason the unexposedsurface

Testreport rco.i2 I A3Decernber2012


Copyno.: 8/3
PageTof16
t]
!!
l

Tr ansI ation .form Romani an


rtr!alttrrrrrrrrtlrlarr.rlrr:lrrlrrlrflrrrrrtrrralrrr:ltlr:rrltrlrtrrrrrtrrrrrr

Appeadfx 3 of the test report no. 32 / 03 December 2012

Records of the oven temperaturethroughout the test

Table 4 shows the temperaturevalues measuredinside the oven for testing, aecording to the
positioningof the innerthermocouples
in Figure 1.
rabre4

Time
1n!n1 Tel To2 Te3 Te4 Te5 Tef Te? fe8 Aveng.
Pcl
Slandard
cnrye

5 s62 572 577 {t1 571 575 568 5'.16


l0 570 s76 584 556 573 574 572 603
16 613 01J 620 594 6A9 608 610 626
25 05 I 617 647 628 635 638 637 645
42 649 660 671 662 664 675 664 663
55 651 672 682 695 689 698 681 678
'117
67 665 696 739 724 743 715 739
't98 809 ?81
75 724 165 786 809 78r
80 t t) 791 765 776 1'11 781 111
815
'1'14 -t9.')
89 792 766 77'.| 778 778 824

Tel-Te8 [uC] - represents


the flat thermocouples,
for temperaturemeasurement,
insidethe
oven.

Due to a technicalfailure,Te7 TeZ thermocouples,positionedinsidethe over, as shownin


Figure1, doesnof function.This doesnot affectthe qualityof the test,or the qualifyof the
resultsobtained.

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012


Copyno.: 8/3
Page8 of 16
rl
'l
t

TransIati anfu rm Romani an


I I I r t r I I I I I r ! I I I t I I I r I I I I r r I r I I t t I I I r ir r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r t I I I I I t I I t l a r I l r t I I | | t I

Recordedtemperature relatiye to Standard ISO 834 Standard


temperaturecurve
Itcll : -.'"-"

?tl0 ,
:
64il ,. ...
*IeI

i ' teJ

I rtr' t" " " *" lc4

: *-Ics

? 4s*'re8
t,
g c 0i : - - - - : Cdolalod nven!€
..-, Sftdrd€ws

0 5 10 15 , 20 25 30 3' {q 45 ..-5! 55 60 05 7O 75 80 8s 8e
Fig. 4 - Temperaturerecordedduring the test inside the ove.n

l
lWeasuredaveragetemSerahrrcrolative to temperature ISO 834 i
I

Standardtemperaturecurve 'l i
1000 ,.

q,t0

se

na

g{s
!'
Cil@lalel avsreo

5rt Stdddtlowe

Psitive d&irdon

4t(l N(gilile dsiatio[

100

,i . .
t: a;
tt
i: :l!0 .1r'
I
i,,i.
j.

i.*"*.....".-." *,J.
I
t
i
I
I

Fig.

Testreport
Copyno
Page9 of 16
!!!

. Translation fbrm Romanian


l:ra:lrr.rrrrlrlr:rrr:a-rrrrairrrrrtttlJatrttrrrrrrarrrrrlrrllrrrlrrrrrtlrrrrrrrr

Appendix 4 to the test report no. 32 / 03 December20t2

Recordsof the environmentalconditionsin the testchamberthroughoutthc tcst

Temperature and relative humidify in the laboratory

(Y.EH)
(q) ?r.2 !4.2

31.8
63.6

5?.0
16.4

4'r..4
zt$

31.8
tt,s

21.2

4.8 .10,6

-0.8
0.0
{e23;14 t0t-3216 t0:42:1.0 t0tsz:te \taa*6 1 1:t2;18 11:.22J4
08:92:16 10i02:t! 't2.yt2s12 1*43,2412 12{i''r012 12.03"?0{?
12*/t4972 12.w2*r2 12{,120121243.20t2 1143-2612f2.0312011

Temperafure Relativehumidity Dew point temperature

Fig.6
Evolution of temperatureandrelativehumidity insidethe test laboratorythroughoutthe testand
Post-test

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December20]2


Copyno.: 8/3
Pagel0 of16
11
I t
i

Translati on form Romanian


llrrlrt:rltartat:ltr:lrt!.rrrrtrrrttrrirrrrrrtarlrttratrrtrlratrfrr,lltltrllrrrlt

Appendix 5 to the lest report no. 32 / 03 December2012

Recordsof the ovenpressureantl,thedeformationsin themiddle areaof the testspecimen

Pressure[Pal
11
:
I

1-08

x.06

r.04

1.82

0"98

0-95

t,-.14..'!ei'x"--r'_!r'

1 5 10 15 20 ?5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75, 80 85 90

F'ig.7
Thepressure
recordedduringthetestinsidethe oven

Deformationslmml
L

o,9
0.8
a.7
ft.5
0.5
0.+ * Deformations
[mm] i

o.3 I

0.2
U,I

0
1n r5 2A 25
u 20 rl3 66 89 Time [nin]
U 45 65 89

Fig.8
Deformationsrecordedduring the test

Testreport no, 32 I 0j December2012


Copyno.: 8/3
Page11of 16
I'F
frsns lation fbrm Romanian
ltlttalaaaltrllllllt:lflrr-rtaattlt:t:ttttltltll:ttttttttllttrtrrrrrrltttttratr

Appendix6 to the testreport no.32i 03 December2012

i"*
:.F.

x{
.sl

PhotoI
Positioningof thethermocouples
on theunexposed
surtbce

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December


2012
Copv no.: 8/3
lirr; ; Page12 of 16
ilJl
l[,1'l
7

T-ranslationform RomQntan
rrrtllrrtlattlltltataaataltaaaraaala

Testreport no. 32 / 03 l)ecembe.r20I 2


Copt nrt.: 8/3
P a g e1 3o f 1 6

l:',. :.'
ril[
lr ll'
i't-, " ".
:'.'
TransIat i on fbr m Rotnaniatt
tl!rrrrt!:ltlttrttrtrararrrrrtttrlttttf:ttatttarrtllrlrlflraarllrtlaartattttrll

Photo5
SeeTable1,min. 89

Testreportno. 32 / 03 December2012
Copyno.: B/3
|,. Page14 of16

ittr
7 t:

77anslation fbrm Rornanian


rrt:ltltrtttttrtrltattaltttlttttttttlirrttlaalttatltltltltllrtltrarrrrrrttllttr

lW
Looseof tightness
pe(brmcnce
cri.terion

Photo6
SeeTablel, min. 89
Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012
Copy no.: B/3
Page15of16

l"
I t'1 |
rill
{|l;ri
I \tu
Fl

I7 ansIationfo rm.Romanian
:t.atrrrttrrttriraa!rrrrrrrl..rr'lrrrrrar|-rrlr,r,rr.trllllrtlalltlllt:lttltttllrr::l!r

Appendix 7 ta the test report no,32l 03 Decembar2Al2

Detailsof constructionprovidedby the manufacturer

Tongueandgroove
joint type Superioradherence
of tke cladding
madeduring the
'1.. foam injection
,3 process
ii',

Magnesium oxide
plates12.5mm
Vapor and
tightnessbanier Polyurethanefoam
injected125mm

,Fig.9

Constructiondetail of the testedelement

Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012


6 /a

LOpy no.: d/)


Page16 of16

You might also like