Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012 Fire Test
2012 Fire Test
Code:F-PG-5.10-01
URBAAi
INCO
lNcERfi
MINISTRYOF REC:ONALDEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM
National Institute for Researchand Developmentin ConstructionoUrtran Planningand
SustainableSpatialDevelopment"URBAN-INCERC'
266 Sos.PantelimonStreet.421652,District2, Bucharest,
Phoneno.: 021.255.02.70; Fax no.:
021.255.18.52;Fax no.: 021.255
.00.62;E-mail:U$gl":i{U.crq(!ilrAqd.re,
ryryurincd.r'o
RESEARCHAND TESTLABORATORY
FIRE SAFETY OF CONSTRACTIONS
INCD "URBAN-INCERC"GeneralManager
VasileMeita,AssociateProfessor,
PhD,Architect Official Se.tl
[Illegibte SignatureJ
Contract:528T12012
TransLationform Romanian
ll::arrllrrtll:allttfttl:lllrrrtrrrrrirrrlr.rrr'a!:rrltttrarlfrltrllrrrl:rtrttl:t
9. Resultsobtained:
Storageconditions:
During storage,lhetest qpesimenwas.maintainedat an arnbienttemperatureof 23 * 10 "C and a
relativehumidityof 50 + l0%.
Bearing conditions:
The sfeclqen.yas in the ovenopsilingwith all edgessimply supported.The edgeshave
fortted
beensealedwith mineralwool.
Testingconditions:
The environmentalconditionsin thetestingroom bsforebeginningthe test:
Relativeair humidiff lu/ol Ambientair temporature["C]
71.7 10.0
- Dle to a fault, Te2 andTe7 thermocouples, positionedwithin tho oven,as shownin FIG. 1, do
not fimction.This.ddesnot affectthe quality of the test,nor the quality of the resultsobtained.
Table I
Remarks:
The conformity of the specimenwas verified before and after the test for checking the
construction details provided by the manufacturer.The specimen inspection consisted of
checkingthe overalldimensionsandits thickness.
The construction of the self-supporting
wall is symmetric.
Durirg the test,the specimendoes showsignificantdeformationagainstits original shape.
not
The smokeemittedis chokinganddifficult to breathe.
, Due to the nahue of fire resistance test and, therefore,the dfficulty to quqntifi the fire
resistancerneasurementuncertainty,it is not possible to, specif! the accuracy degree of the
result.
. Thetest report may not be reproduced,partia[ly and / or fully, without the written approyal of
the laborutory that performed the test.Appendix I, Appendix 2, Appendix 3, Appendix 4,
Appendix 5, Appendix 6. Appendix 7 are part of this testrepart.
Approvedby,
CeneralMangerINCERCBucharest Subsidiary
ClaudiuMatei,Engineer
Illlegible Signature]
Checkedby, Preparedby,
Headof Laboratory OctavianLalu
LapadBubulete,Engineer flilegible SignatureJ
IIllegible SignatureJ
Layoutof thernocouples
II
'.rl trz
K F
Te3 Ta4
a
l. i6
?
\..
s9
/'
E
t
res I Te6 \ssg
m'I
E4
Tb7
I
I Te8
N E.
\
B & \
FiE.l Fip 2
Positioningaf thermocouples Positioningof thermocouples
on the
insidethe oven unexposedsideof the specimen
Remarks:
Table 3
'r:1 8? E3 E4 Is ES E7 af s9 Els, 811 E1? t113' 814 815
TlE.
lniol fec lucl ec :?. fl{:1 I'Cl rfofll: Pcl rer fi€r ioc: .IJC] fcl ftI i,oc'l
0 iI 10 l1 tCI 11 10 il 1S IO IO t0 1 0 r0 1t
i8 l4 i-) t4 LA IQ LI t8 19 ltt \7 18 tn t7 I8
30 16 r9 l8 20 r9 24 ?9 tR .44 45 J0. 37 38 JO 4'7
48 40 4A
38 4A 4l 38 4fi sri 47 66 44 56 -55 49
62 55 <A 4[, 47 <o. .-60. 111 59 6? .r{O: 53 60 58
7& 58 59 0t 5i {6 6l 62, 70 tll; 77 64 .69 '/0 64
59 '14. '7A
89 59 6{ b4 6l .64 A< 73 4 78 a1
+E:
-=.f4
**i6
-':*[8
,-,-e!
+-- Sl?
..*,,: lt).ti
....--tr;
Fig.3
Table 4 shows the temperaturevalues measuredinside the oven for testing, aecording to the
positioningof the innerthermocouples
in Figure 1.
rabre4
Time
1n!n1 Tel To2 Te3 Te4 Te5 Tef Te? fe8 Aveng.
Pcl
Slandard
cnrye
?tl0 ,
:
64il ,. ...
*IeI
i ' teJ
: *-Ics
? 4s*'re8
t,
g c 0i : - - - - : Cdolalod nven!€
..-, Sftdrd€ws
0 5 10 15 , 20 25 30 3' {q 45 ..-5! 55 60 05 7O 75 80 8s 8e
Fig. 4 - Temperaturerecordedduring the test inside the ove.n
l
lWeasuredaveragetemSerahrrcrolative to temperature ISO 834 i
I
Standardtemperaturecurve 'l i
1000 ,.
q,t0
se
na
g{s
!'
Cil@lalel avsreo
5rt Stdddtlowe
Psitive d&irdon
100
,i . .
t: a;
tt
i: :l!0 .1r'
I
i,,i.
j.
i.*"*.....".-." *,J.
I
t
i
I
I
Fig.
Testreport
Copyno
Page9 of 16
!!!
(Y.EH)
(q) ?r.2 !4.2
31.8
63.6
5?.0
16.4
4'r..4
zt$
31.8
tt,s
21.2
4.8 .10,6
-0.8
0.0
{e23;14 t0t-3216 t0:42:1.0 t0tsz:te \taa*6 1 1:t2;18 11:.22J4
08:92:16 10i02:t! 't2.yt2s12 1*43,2412 12{i''r012 12.03"?0{?
12*/t4972 12.w2*r2 12{,120121243.20t2 1143-2612f2.0312011
Fig.6
Evolution of temperatureandrelativehumidity insidethe test laboratorythroughoutthe testand
Post-test
Pressure[Pal
11
:
I
1-08
x.06
r.04
1.82
0"98
0-95
t,-.14..'!ei'x"--r'_!r'
1 5 10 15 20 ?5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75, 80 85 90
F'ig.7
Thepressure
recordedduringthetestinsidethe oven
Deformationslmml
L
o,9
0.8
a.7
ft.5
0.5
0.+ * Deformations
[mm] i
o.3 I
0.2
U,I
0
1n r5 2A 25
u 20 rl3 66 89 Time [nin]
U 45 65 89
Fig.8
Deformationsrecordedduring the test
i"*
:.F.
x{
.sl
PhotoI
Positioningof thethermocouples
on theunexposed
surtbce
T-ranslationform RomQntan
rrrtllrrtlattlltltataaataltaaaraaala
l:',. :.'
ril[
lr ll'
i't-, " ".
:'.'
TransIat i on fbr m Rotnaniatt
tl!rrrrt!:ltlttrttrtrararrrrrtttrlttttf:ttatttarrtllrlrlflraarllrtlaartattttrll
Photo5
SeeTable1,min. 89
Testreportno. 32 / 03 December2012
Copyno.: B/3
|,. Page14 of16
ittr
7 t:
lW
Looseof tightness
pe(brmcnce
cri.terion
Photo6
SeeTablel, min. 89
Testreport no. 32 / 03 December2012
Copy no.: B/3
Page15of16
l"
I t'1 |
rill
{|l;ri
I \tu
Fl
I7 ansIationfo rm.Romanian
:t.atrrrttrrttriraa!rrrrrrrl..rr'lrrrrrar|-rrlr,r,rr.trllllrtlalltlllt:lttltttllrr::l!r
Tongueandgroove
joint type Superioradherence
of tke cladding
madeduring the
'1.. foam injection
,3 process
ii',
Magnesium oxide
plates12.5mm
Vapor and
tightnessbanier Polyurethanefoam
injected125mm
,Fig.9