(PDF) Criteria For Evaluating Research Papers - Teófilo Correa - Academia - Edu

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

06/09/2021 (PDF) Criteria for Evaluating Research Papers | Teófilo Correa - Academia.

edu

LO G I N SIGN UP

Criteria for Evaluating Research Papers


Teófilo Correa

Criteria for evaluating research papers


Dr. Te—filo Correa
cohesion and Consistency
! The title reflects the content of the paper accurately
"
# Important terms
The problem and concepts
statement are clearly
is adequately defined in the paper
stated
$ The purpose of the study concurs with the Statement of the Problem
% The methodology of the paper is detailed and relevant for studying the topic
& The research design seems appropriate for the research of the problem
' The paper includes an outline that reflects the structure and content of the paper
ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE

( The sources are relevant to the topic/research


) The sources are updated
* The Literature Review is adequately covered
!* There is a critical evaluation of the sources in the Literature Review
"* There is a critical evaluation of the ideas/arguments of author(s) quoted in the paper
Clarity
#* There is a clear and logical structure of the paper
$* Ideas are arranged in a logical order
&) The arguments/ideas from the researcher are presented clearly and unambiguously
') Make each sentence in a paragraph adhere to the main idea of the paragraph
'* Use transitions and other cohesive words to link ideas/sentences/paragraphs effectively
Precision
(* This step in the exegetical analysis is well done
)* The paper follows the instructor's guidelines for the paper
+ The statement shows enough support from specialized literature
!+ There is a clear distinction between the ideas of an author and the ideas of the researcher
"+ The paper offers enough analysis for supporting the arguments or conclusions
#+ This point/section is relevant for the purpose of this paper
$+ An effective summary is provided within the section
%+ The section/paper includes conclusions
&+ An important issue would not be missing from the discussions
'+ The results are plausible and coherent with the research
(+ The author suggests some topics for future research related to the current study
Style and Format
)+ The format of the paper is according to AIIAS Research Standards and Writing Manual
, The layout of the Hebrew/Greek text is well done
!, The references/quotes are properly cited throughout the document
", Follow the guidelines of Turabian style for the footnotes
#,
Follow the guidelines of Turabian style for the bibliography list
A. The Content (maximum of 75 points)
¥ Consistency and Analysis (max. 35 points)
¥ Clarity and Precision (max. 40 points)
!. The Style and Format (maximum of 25 points)
TOTAL D O W N LO A D P D F
Late submission (there will be a deduction of the total score)

https://www.academia.edu/28924091/Criteria_for_Evaluating_Research_Papers 1/2
06/09/2021 (PDF) Criteria for Evaluating Research Papers | Teófilo Correa - Academia.edu

Find new research papers in: Physics Chemistry Biology Health Sciences Ecology Earth Sciences Cognitive Science
Mathematics Computer Science

D O W N LO A D P D F

https://www.academia.edu/28924091/Criteria_for_Evaluating_Research_Papers 2/2

You might also like