New Chandigarh Case

1
/ i. Af. Pi--uxioe-1)
cxd t-v.i.A,0,7
a-k,CIA/fi 1,8°Lk-in g‘ ' I 1 Teorte- 4-,. ry''‘ti kok-A-/- e.

+0 isf e_ 0-k. 1,:.Ditt-1 rn not,0 t(iec-__ -.DEd
J
c) 00\171 tADIrt 0 ky-1 4-0
a() t/0;:br\ 'kin e ry\onel ot-Loe_c)

•• ck_vv--\ nic) CC #3^-?-1 0J019__ 1,6141 --t-t*, 't"Zt.1 -4-)e_i 5
-Vii\redkeywa uo cio )ca-6r-ak. on r hou-oe.... .
a vv:I. 41,-,,e},40)-,L r L.cw,e_c) -Riv.e_ To ° •
nti-\• 0 m
/
q yy,e4-1 t,\DOLL-0 r) 04 1, 3r-:''' c',CYrY1 1 v) .1
l_Ar\ arPO tAr)e-e__A a /3 IV1 t\ VVV:Al/N-0--;_ Ck. ir) di
Jr uxy\d-D al OtJA C\ We' 1.11G\,-.D k) et)
A-Ne,.5 -1kAk. tele_ voil kik C,o(re. 4-0 .----

c."r- ot.;.oe'.. Ct,Y(lj re(2,30ni
44,
KAITYZJILAFOUCE
tftl
,31-1 •?kti.if 3414(1)01 ft1.,
.?161qct) p.z{ 311jao
I
Smt. Shibani Parti W/o Late Sh. Gautam Parti,

Rio 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments,
DLF Phase-1, Gunigram.
(D94-11 a S15 %3TT70)0111.t0 fc.,-;ftc5 19 1. (7-

1z -q1 i 3114-44.t 3alf)q1i 2005 $. 3l I4cf 7-F9-1I
ar1t
3Lit1ct1 ratf4 A 3411W ft-91m 24.08 2020 .W1 3T1-4-4-9 . 111 gill A
7fritt: (:.;itct) 2i.03.2020 4; 1.111k1 i;-511 I 3Ify -61V 1 1 I 4[4
gliTt 71TNI WIZtE11:1 If"Kit 314Iq41, ilki-TrA pp7 mct q-.41 TIM
31-11:1R 1T91 •ti 1405H f)
9101 1688-1) 1:491-cF 27.12.19 t i 71-4 R4)-t 13T4T Ler CI Tg I
9ft4T CO
2 9T1èHI 3039/t fti91-eF 28.12.19 4`)) 13141 qi) i.-i-t-Trq it I

3 I 3ti-ffet-T 4, 1-$4
T)M 31144511) 'c4

741fazt, 1,1•04.1119 I
ocoggnhcOry c.in
0124-2869300a
77('PP
Yltf TM' 0511174* xIttiktra 2005 ilk WV 4(1) xiVO 3VITir INT
MT 3i1q Two Vali Itt firirc at k qugmlitr Trum 1nirrt t
7 1Flitt wrdagif prZli
— *Imre Tow et ow xetatzr 3i1triortr, Arktr
To
The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

DLF, Gurugram.
Subject: Complaint against:-
1. Gautam Parti R/o H. No. 101/7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave,

DLF, Gurugrain (Mob.:- 9971289999)
2. Shivani PartiR/o 11. No. 101/7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave,

DLF, Gurugram(Mob:- 9810730005)
3. Sana Partiltio H. No. 101/7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave, DLF,
Gurugram
4. Rohit Puri(Mob:- 997171260), (-NA'N\ 5cro \\ 7 1 -4-4' 4 I 2. S
r-5.Vikram Kashyap •
, 6. Ranjit KashyapR/o S-49/3940, 3rd floor, Block-S, Near

- Neelkanth Hospital, DLF Phase-111, Nathupur, Gurugram. c:‘
7. Vipin ® Pradeep (Mob:- 7206363953)
8. Bunjy_(Mob:- 8699804004)
9. Devraj (Mob:- 4442033185161 foreign mobile)
Respected Sir,
1, Ramesh Khatkar Sfo Sh. Chanda Ram, Rio H.No. 652/20, Gall No.
3, Hari Nagar, Narwaria, Distt. iind, Mob.:-9416118433 do hereby submit the
following complaint against the above named accused persons, as they have cheated
me and they have also committed criminal breach of trust and criminally intimidated
me.Tbe facts of the case are as follows:-
1. That accused Devraj having foreign mobile no. +442033185161 met ine
Moscow (Russia) and allured me to invest money in M/s Quick Facilitators
Pvt. Ltd., having office near Block-A, Main Marg, Opposite Pro (he Park, near
M.G. Road metro station, Gurugram, on the plea that on the amount of
investment, I may earn 10% to 40/o incentive on the invested money and he
asked to contact Rohit Puri in Delhi by seeking engagement On his mobile no.
9911712650.
r-
- 7*
started investing money

2. That thereupon, I contacted Rohit Puri at Delhi and
and initially the amount of Rs. 8 Laldis was deposited in the year 2017 to 2018.
"Ramesh
After investment of money, the accused Devraj provided a User ID
Khatkar" and password "RI23456" and they also assured to refund the money
as and when the same is asked for by me.
3 That on the assurances made by above persons, I invested Rs. 1.25 Crores upto
March/April 2018 and the due amount, after adding incentive, comes to
approximately Rs. 2.5 crones. The bank statements in this regard are enclosed
herewith.
4. That in December, 2018, when I demanded money back from Rohit Puri and
Devraj, they told that first, the amount of Rs. 22 Lakits will have to be paid in
the shape of tax, only thereafter the refund of money will be considered.
. That the amount of Rs, 22 laktis were. deposited in Dubai in the shape of
Dirhams (currency of Dubai), in the account "Horizon Marketing FZEIBAN
AE020520000111069300018 SWIFT — N1SLAEAD. NOOR Bank, Business
Park, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai, U Ali."
_
./ 6. That thereafter, they got transferred an amount of 788 Eurosin the current
account of the undersigned in HDFC Bank bearing account no.
50200032260065. However, the bank refused to convert the amount in the
Indian Rupees by saying that the RBI guidelines do not allow for the same.
Thereafter, the said amount was retransfermi in the account of the accused
persons.
7. That after the said incident, I frequently contacted Rohit Puri and Devraj and
they told that I will have to visit Moscow and China for opening an account.
Accordingly, I opened the account in Moscowbut they did not deposit any
money in the said account on one pretext or the other. They kept giving me
fake assurances and ultimately assured that the payment will be made in
Gurugam.
8 That thereafter, I visited the office of the company at M.G. Road. Gurugrani as
well as Greater Kailash-1, Delhi, . Thereupon, the accused
personsincludingRoInt Puri, Devraj etc. called me in DLF Emporia Mall, Delhi
on 17.07.2019 for full final settlement, where we conversed with each other.
they gave cheques for the. amciint of Rs. 1.80 crores (six cheques of Rs. 30
Lakhs each). Copy of cheques arc enclosed herewith. Two of those cheques
were bounced from ICIC1 Bank, Narwann.
9. That thereafter, in the month of October 2019, the accused Vipin Pradeep
called me at Karnal for the purpose of refund of money, where Bunty and
vipin along with some other persons met me. There, they told me that the
company is in loss and 1 should accept the amount of Rs.30 Lakhs and also
demanded back the abovementionedcheques. However, we did not return ay
cheque to them.
10. Thereafter,in the month of November 2019, Bunty and Vipin called the
undersigned at hid in Dalam Wala I loci and offered Rs. 30 Lakhs but aigeed
to pay Rs. 20 Lakhs on the condition to sign an affidavit, which was having the
mention of Gautam Patti and Rohit Puri. 1 refused to sip) the said affidavit.
they lefl the hotel, leaving the said affidavit with me.
Z
it. That idler some time, they asked that the amount Nvi 11 be transferred in the
\\
• : account of my friend Navneetas the amount of Rs: 50 Lakhs is payable to
la ,cielf/30
‘1
Navneet by me. However, no money was transferred in the account of Navneet
for the reasons best known to them.
12. That thereafter, Gautam Parti died on 01.12.2019.11 is pertinent to mention
here that my mother Smt. Krishna Devi went into depression due to possibility
of loss of such huge amount of money and later on she died on 03.12,2019 due
to heart failure.
13. That thereafter, I along with my family members and my friend Rohtash visited
the house of Gautam Partii.e. H.No. 101t7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave,DLF,
Gunigram on 10,12.2019, where Shivani Parti W/o Craw= Patti and Sana
Patti D/o Gamin Patti met us and they told that only Rohit Puri, Raniit
Kashyap and Vikram Kashyap are responsible to refund the money and they
have no concern in the same and tin, were only assisting me. after some time,
Shivani Patti called the police in the said house and both the parties went t6
policestation DLF Phase-I, Guru gram, where the undertaking was taken by the
police officials from both the parties. The undertaking was obtained from
accused Saila Pant that she and her family members will fully assist me and
refund of my money and the undertaking was taken from me that as and when
I will visit the house of Shivani etc. 1 will give the intimation to P.S.
Phase-I, Gurugam.
14. That when the amount was not refunded to me by anyone, then lastly
I visited
the M.G. Road office of Mis Quick Facilitators Pvt. Ltd.,
where Rohit Puri was
available and he came outside the office and refused
to refund any money and
threatened me to face dire consequences in case I
again visit the company and
demand money.
15. That the above averments reveal
that the above named accused
intention to dupe me of my hard persons had the
earned money since the very
have been cheated and a inception. Now,
criminal breach of trust has
above named accused, bene committed bythe
persons. rather, I have also been
but no money has been criminally intimidated
refunded to me by the
due to which I have above named accused
suffered great mental persons,
persons, in connivance agony. The above named accused
with each other, have
cheating, criminal breach committed the above acts
of trpst, criminal of
It is submitted intimidation etc.
that I have been
duped of a huge
earnedrnoney i.e. around R. amount of my hard
2.80 Crores, due
great mental to whih I am
depression. suffering from
It is, therefore,
requested that
420/406/506 IPC, Section 3 thecrim Mal
of Haryana case FIRunder sections
Establishments Act may Protection of Depositors
kindly be got in
P.S. Sector-29, registered aga inst the above namedFinancial
persons
Gurugram and
that the justice may strict legal action may be taken
be imparted to against them so
persons may fl ee to me.There is evety
abroad and their apprehension that the
passports may also accused
It is also kindly be seized.
requested that the above
involved in a big
scam and the s named company Quick
ame may be brought to the Facilitators is
investigation is
conducted, lime light, if
thorough
Thanking you
inmanticipation.
Dated:-
Yours Sine rely
Ramesh Khatkar Sio

Rio :- H. No, Sh. Chanda
4
652 /2 0, Cali Rarn,
Nagar, Narwana, No, 3, Hari
Distt. Jind,
9416118433,
fTT7 -11-rri
cbiq c1/4 I -ff NT/1W 41.0 07R) ,V14.414
cOliia) 1688—P 27.12.2019 f ictRicicbci RAT Ndcfri p

71-13 N -Rt 7090 652/20 ,1c4 90 3, -01 -TIV 11-4 'CA I-E1
3ma cci 1-1-4 .3i-kl,td ficbRict 31.2:179 qTT '1141 f f (c L çf
iNi-14wR <4,1 9 1;14-R -101.11. Acf Errar 1R1T
aicpwoct,or I D14,P4c-1 T1 4-47-M itu
7411 f-iicr))44ci tR?-1 1 f5 (4,1400 311 .l11 q)• tj DtcrtLio -uftra )cli
t
ftt-8 1lTT Trzi—t
11:4*
31171WI
gtO(r- Nx-1, 0, 17T1111
—3t--12-11
12:371
SHO DIf Phase 1
26 Jan 2020 c
Hello Sat aana. Had
come to dlf phase 1 police station on
11th December 2019 when a few
people trespassed into my house
and were threatening us to do kabza.
You provided me your number on
that day. I wanted to speak to you
regarding the same as there have
been few updates and Ramesh and
his brother Navneet are contacting
my mother and we do not wish to
have any contact with them
Please let me know when can i

callyou as I need guidance from u
6:48 DM J./
thank you 6'48 PM .././
I will call you back 7:01 pm
Will be waiting. Thank u _
1 Feb 2020
Hi you matter soughted out or still
G 0 a
12:384 all S s 115
SHO Dlf Phase 1 El

and were threatening us to do kabza.
You provided me your number on
that day. I wanted to speak to you
regarding the same as there have
been few updates and Ramesh and
his brother Navneet are contacting
my mother and we do not wish to
have any contact with them
Please let me know when can i

callyou as I need guidance from u
6:48 PM .//
thank you 3 48 PM V/
I will call you back
Will be waiting. Thank u 7:03 pm ,/./
1Feb 2020
Hi you matter soughted out or still

pending 6:08 DM
No Sir. Matter is still unresolved as I

am very clueless as to what to do
6.55 PA .././
D pT ro 1o1/7, fr
PrfelT
mfl'w
3. f4T-# Tr-4,Ta' s 34664027287 wha a

--ril
.„ •
4. 1t6
- # .To235 ;=.44-,,tiT -dti<4147
5. -,z-trizI1c( 47- arr ;4).0 8800343774
7. t.t 1frrd7 ,,p,..1141/LtrAt

, #, 9810557788 ftWea-C.
8. retPlsitrz ctia-tic.i ;to 7206363953
9. t'a To 8699804004
,act.c1 cti crck-1) (-16(1 fi-16,71(,441,( GETCO PRO , QUICK

i ifau
FACILITATOR P.V T L T D PRO FAC M•Fr # sritif Ttrz th r
i.fit 2.80 arft 6.!-;1-4,71 44 tET4T / FZIT 3-qt7F. 1ft
/
{A} 652./20
cr -dMi 4.7f TrA. cflç.41 i ;f1-34161184 33
-7
Scanned with CamScanner

{B} 7 -d---4-bp:5-1-4-tr 2015 14. TtTT tliTt 3-itz 5, Tza tr-{
- it attT
fg q-r-dt Tarzfr 13
1-1 1--TRIT rfa -A-N T4T- Tra.
4-rt arm-g EfT
(C) prar-A., FTaT 3 1:44-14:r (-T\-1

7„T
{D} ;taw
3.,n(f 1flc Lip 41 ,'FP-z-
;It tr-4- 2016 -4'1 .37(1. 7 4.
Trai f c44'{ 3-1-
°" A" 4)e-LA 147 --1-Rtm an-{- ,t, t;}
3c. ai-FT-4;f 10%
40%d4' .3-1T4 btit/ 1.80 w#-$' 341T 3- 1* .T-470.4.4 #14, trT Turth't
Tc-1-1 .04-1 wiicthrii tic,1 NT6T qr..bcr %)./ Tra. rz.: d.r.41.rer
31NaRio tXT *3)
-(P-TT#
cbldiqi4 /
{E} 3 ;#1 2016 2018 ciLb 37:1" ,A10-1-ttrirrj

Wat FT 2.80
ftF 4.4, Ural- fay 1. 1=1 TRci10-11 TT tiTT - (414
358901500551
2 ICIC1 f47- 17Z1171- tilTW -,“44r
"154905000244
3 ICIC1 itFct ZiaT 1.1176 -RtM
164901500679
4. HDF
5010024323439
5. HDFC -4'-
50200032257848
6. HDF
50200032260065
358901500550
3
42260100001569
{F} 1-tr #4. -47 '4g iT'ta-xr ertA-t 3frf

2 -MT-FA ,C1 aircW fC
- iref4T 74- ft-ziT 31T aitt NITA- 14711. 71751* 3gr
tat/ 51. att-{ T 1 { -4T{} 3-fut fZiat ;‘-ivt ifi 404- 4-{A 4' 311-T WO arTcW
%71ati prr

74 4 eat iftfr ;t 41-A.
4 {G)
tft,741- #17; 4-ffa tczg Pj.741"
/ Trt „4.
3 .art 2019 41 10/12 311a9Mt Tan aTrT
317 T TT ri7TT 7
411 AT, 01. 4-4/ itlt YPaTa" 1:47faT
airra/
-Affig -cs;r5rt
{H} ?:)-ai3T !rfT

77 Y tricrtz
fravgoirrrr ttir
f4,•11 3Itt WFT T'647 511Fii el"
Jtt t 3 . 7 T-Tr zr6f ft7 J'{7
!,:1
r4f Itua.a./7-417 ch,(0-11,
tth-fPret 34T %sir wn'tr 4.7 414-d
t TPA' tT
417 qqc/triT /
(1) KK T !--1;la 3{P-TT Zft 3 tTTIt tt# c.14).( criiclOir xr Tt f I Tf.a.

,.41
oicii-cli, 2019# tti 341T fiTT-4 TT IA-4 Yrza- RI 01{<TMT o-16 4t c14.1t, 311 7T3ct .7T'
ckti ttik ATT 3iTir t vilsil 4 -Wet afti-A" trW e,tFa (171 ri'M t TritT 'al-7 at T6i. TP
5/6 ,FM:ri pt . FM f4-1(4 3t1 Vs-* 41717 Ws' 7 <1 -G14.7".Tt 1:11p* ,4101.1* *tt *IfiRT 4.'44 'Mt
tt -4 fl'T "t-,t-A t (4-4,tui vs 4t-Jit 't cir,i 31T71:4 t Ad' 46i # TKr 3/1-4- <it 4-,[disrf
,3
Ter trg ry ara ;?ft trT4 t
{J} prt 4
- t * -6T -ctt 314 47,3":
.2
3ffer
fkc r ?,7111t 917 374* alt 71t, qtrqg Tan
PiTtr Ichri *I- 60-i Ft1 3tr-{ FT•
t t f c# ft ;1'1E' 4Trer Z5't 47TA .341T z-41' (-I

r0414 .11,7114/0i FraT gter r+7:4' OTT 41. 3ra" .3iPT4 m:r Paddi f-T•
ciT(4) cl4cc 3ita- r4arY tr . 'At' arr-T trftart 45a-rr
xtici Mk41 tf cf'd TOT 4/rd-fd, rrff 4t P' rriT
f;t4.7.rx
t ' Thr zgz-th-S' IF -4a Z144 TT417-652 /20
Irt ;T-3 = 1i,,H,•-Hcirddi 'gr4

44
Indian-Non Judicial Stamp at,77-4
Haryana Government
500
Markin tactryp Duty paid:
KOU201906 t 0
Certikate No. penalty:
GRN NO.
60065539 !MEM
• iR ZA( Cw, Y)
e r / First Pity Dptall
Name: Gautam Bharti

SectorilAtard . 7 LardMark: pit
H.No/FIcxr : 101
District : Gurgaon • State: Haryana
City/Village Gurgaon
Phone: 86"-- 04
lE ap_r I Second Party Detail

Name . Ramesh Chaucer
H.No/Floor: A Sector/ward: A Landklark : A
City/Village: Ktratkar District: Jind State: Haryana
Phone: 86-1- **04
Purpose THIS STAMP PAPER USE FOR AGREEMENT
Through Smart phone or on tile wetsite rrttoJegras

The authenticity of this document can be ver ed by scanning this QrCixe
FINAL SETTLEMENT AND PAYMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This Final SQttiument and Payment Acknow edgement ("Acknowledgment"), dated November
2/, 2019 is entered into between Gautarn Ptirti, son of Satish Kumar Parti, male, aged about
47 years, resident of 101/7 Silver Oak Apartments, DLF Phase-1, Gurgaon-122002 and Vikrarn
Kashyap, son of , male, about __years, resident of
. • *********". (hereinafter collectively referred
................
to as "Payer", which shall, unless repugnant to or inconsistent with the context, mean and
include each of their heirs, respective executors, administrators and permitted assigns) P-ty
of the First Part;
Ramesh Chancier, son of „ .. male, aged about.....years, resident

of .(hereinafter referred to as "Payee", which
sisal!, unless repugnant to or inconsistent with the context, mean and include each of his heirs
respective executors, administrators and permitted assigns) Party of the Second Part.
The Party of the First Part and the Party of the Second Part shall collectively be referred to as
"The Part;es"

A
6. Governing Law. This
d by the applicable laws of India.
7. Indemnification: The Payer and pay
from any liabilities, claims, damages, io'ss„.. ,, rnnify, defend and hold harmless each other
costs, expenses, demands, suits and actions,
including without limitation legal
and settlement costs,
Q, Representation and Vilarrantles,
Both the Payer and Payee r epresent and warrant to each
other that they are signing tI,
obligationo-fi5thA,:kprtaarvitlied.Ben)ent out of their frtee will and this constitutes a
legal' or‘u binding es try%attordance with its erms and conditions.
9. Counterparts: This Acknowledge/11p,, ha identical triplicate counterparts,

-1; g"ir;: ll be executed in
each of which shall be deemed an0 together shall constitute one and
Id ail of which
the 3,3ine Marva)ent.
Address: The addresses of e Parties ':irst addres3es

itten above sha I be the respec ve
of the parties for all communication.
11. Entirety of the Acknowledgement This Acknowledgement constitutes the entire

negotiations, understandings, agreements, ,iettlements and payments with respect to the
business and business transactions between the Parties and supersedes all prior oral or
written arrangements, negotiations, understandings, settlements and acknowledgements
between the Parties.
In witness whereof the Partks e caused this Acknovedgement to be executed, iigned

and delivered as of the day ard yer first written above.
GAUTAIV1 PARTI
VlKRAM KASHYAP
RAMESH CHANDER
Witnesses:
......
2.
.,......... .
, eAscati()11.11.0.)*
A, 1
.4•11{1,1 . 4. “. 4 4.,¢4 , 11",
• t
Lt<ct
4,C1.14
r-.)7t4Z
17 '
_
HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (ftziTuTT P71 rudiach #41)
..xrivta C•
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.)
girg itqlt
(UM 154 Sl1t71T iIcii * FFF)
1- District (1 —'ii): GURUGRAM P.S. (TTRT): DLF PHASE-1 Year MO: 2021
FIR No. (VJLfr. #.): 0024 Date (f?rticb): 25/01/2021
15:42
2. S.No. Acts (3Tiitl1:4471) Sections (tIRT(i))
1 IPC 1860 506
3. (a) Occurrence of offence (3171TIT ErC4T):
Day (147): Tuesday Date from (fa7tiF *): 10/12/2019 Date To (ital"6 WW): 10/12/2019
Time Period (f;f1f 3faf1it): Pahar 5 Time From (PRT *): 13:00 hrs Time To (IPS1 WW): 15:00 hrs
Information received at P.S. OTTRT TT Date (farticti): Time (*EM:

Tk-4-4r vrca. 25/01/2021 13:30 hrs
General Diary Reference Entry No. (Vitfit Time (Wrzr):
(i)Avuoivi #414):
012 25/01/2021
14:36 hrs
4. Type of Information (*own *T W1): Written
5. Place of Occurrence
(icrui-ti et):
1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S. * 3ltT ihn: NORTH, 1.1 Km(s) Beat No. (ft ft.):
(b) Address (gal): DLF PH 1, 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments,
(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of P.S. (Wit l'aRT *MT * triRT T WM):
District (State) (itHT (IT T)):
System IP (3Tt4t):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 1/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (eitztTuTT 'wing) #4T)
,rysna Poi ce
tztrxr TK-4-4r sittrIt
(UM 154 T Wit7FT *sigctl * FF6)
6. Complainant / Informant (51"+"TzraWer / ichcn):
(a) Name (RTF): Shibani Parti
Husband's Name (lfaVi WM): Late Gautam Parti
Date/Year of Birth (Wrg ft* / (d) Nationality (i11,41t1on): INDIA

1975
UID No. MiTtgt
Passport No. OTTIrcitt
Date of Issue (71ft Al fait): Place of Issue (7111 wi# T riTTR):

(g) Occupation (aMIT-4"):
(h) Address
Address Type MT *T Address (treT)

TWIT)
Present Address 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments DLF PH 1, DLF
PHASE-1, GURUGRAM, HARYANA, INDIA
2 Permanent Address 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments DLF PH 1, DLF
PHASE-1, GURUGRAM, HARYANA, INDIA
(i) Phone number (VITPIr Mobile (44i*ei TO:
7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars (Wra / / 31 -e1(1
31rs-w1 wrq fawur *Oci au ):
Name (Mg) Alias (itoriiii) Relative's Name (ikitUT T Mg)
RAMESH Father's Name: SHRI CHANDA RAM

KHATKAR
System IP (3ftft):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 2/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (VitziluTT PT 'wag, 14-41)
%VTR' viol 44
(trru 154 tg V*ZiT ,t0d1 *
8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant (51W2rdWer / vietichci 7TiT
ittt 411 WiT4 *
9. Particulars of properties of interest Wir-trF 4.14-41 1
frdP70:
S. No. Property Type ( -41c-c1 * Sub Type (Yr 31-+Til Value(In Rs/-) KR!' (w
wwg)
10. Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-) (tit .19 4-4 cc! Tt"-a . 31
-Ri(W 7:11)):
11* Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any (319Al9T itritt / zkft.WWitIT i.,zit *fit fl):
S. No. UIDB Number (Tkitzwur t)
( .fr.)
12. First Information contents ORM Vi on I at70:
Dated.22.09.2020 To,The Commissioner of Police Gurugram, Haryana COMPLAINT AGAINST 1.

RAMESH KHATKAR SON OF SHRI CHANDA RAM, RESIDENT OF H. NO. 652/20, GALI NO. 3,
HARI NAGAR, NARWANA, DISTRICT JIND, HARYANA, MOB. NO. 9415118433 FOR
LEVELLING FALSE ACCUSATIONS AND FILING FALSECOMPLAINTS AGAINST THE
COMPLAINANTS, FOR MAKING A FALSE AND FABRICATED DOCUMENT CAUSING
CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION, INSULT AND ANNOYANCE, CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION BY
ANONYMOUS COMMUNICATIONS AND ADMINISTRING TO CAUSE DEATH OR
GREVIOUS HURT TO THE COMPLAINANTS, UNDER SECTIONS182, 211, 464, 465, 503, 506
(2), 507IPC. The complainants are law abiding citizens and permanent residents of the above
mentioned address. The complainants belong to a respectable, middle class family.That sometime in the
month of July-August, 2019 the husband of the complainant No. 1, namely Late Gautam Parti, was
visiting the Emporio Mall, in Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, along with his Ex-colleague namely Rohit Puri,
where the accused accosted and manhandled the said Rohit Puri and started to question Rohit Puri for
the whereabouts of one Vikram Kashyap. The husband of the complainant No. 1, intervened and asked
the accused to calm down.As the conversation unfolded between the husband of the complainant No. 1
and the accused, it dawned upon the husband of the complainant No. 1, that the said Vikram Kashyap
was also an acquaintance of the husband of the complainant No. 1. The husband of the complainant No.
System IP (311$11:10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 3/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (FitzniuTT iftfr øi1dI1kclt—dT)
.scyclo Poi co
3r1rn Tow ittilt
(trru 154 tr witzrr * Rfa)
loffered to talkto the said Vikram Kashyap and to help and try to solve the problem of the accused.That
to the utter dismay and surprise of the husband of the complainant No. 1 and the complainants,the
accused followed the husband of the complainant No. 1 and came to the house of the complainants and
started pestering the husband of complainant No. 1 to put the accused in contact with Vikram Kashyap.
The husband of the complainant No. 1once again assured the accused that he would do whatever he
could to help the accused. The husband of the complainant No. 1, genuinely tried to help the accused,
but soon thereafter, the physical condition of the husband of the complainant No. 1 started deteriorating
and he became bed ridden, as he was already a cancer patient, since the year 2016.That the accused
thereafter started to harass the complainants by visiting the house time and again and insisting upon
seeing the ailing husband of the complainant No. 1 and also by sending intimidating messages. The
complainant No. 1 gave all information that the husband of the complainant No. 1 had with regards to
Vikram Kashyap, to the accused and told the accused to deal with his problem on his own, as the
husband of the complainant No. 1 was in no position to help the accused any longer.That the accused
once again visited the house of the complainants along with some accompliceson 08/09.11.2019 and
insisted to meet the husband of the complainant No. 1 and refused to leave the house without meeting
the husband of the complainant No. 1 who was in a semi-comatose state by then. There was a verbal
spat between the complainant No. 1 and the accused and the accused and his accomplice became
abusive and left only after seeing the condition of the husband of the complainant No. 1.That the
accused thereafter sent the first page of a fabricated and false document, to the complainant No. 1 on
23.11.2019, by way of a WHATSAPP message and also sent intimidating pictures on 27.11.2019, when
the husband of the complainant No. lwas already hospitalized in the ICU of W Pratiksha, Golf Course
Extension Road, Sector-56, Sushant Lok-II, Gurugram.That the husband of the complainant No.
lbreathed his last on 29.11.2019, and on the thirteenth day of the demise, the accused again came to the
house of the complainants along with horde of people out of which there were also 5-6 women and
threatened the complainant No. 1 to take forcible possession of the house of the complainants. All the
people who had come with the accused were violent and abusive and terrorized the complainants. The
complainant No. 1called up the Police Control Room, after which the accused and his accomplices were
taken to the PS DLF City, Phase-I, Gurugram, where the accused gave a written assurance to the SHO,
PS DLF City, Phase-I, Gurugram, that accused and his family members would first inform the Police
before visiting the house of the complainants in the future.That the complainant No. 1wanted to make a
complaint against the accused but the police officials dissuaded the complainant No. 1 from doing so by
saying that as the complainant No. 1 was a woman the complainant No. 1 would herself get
unnecessarily harassed and would have to repeatedly go to the court, to follow the complaint. The
complainant No. 1 who had recently lost her husband, was suffering from clinical depression, relented
and did not file a formal complaint against the accused and his accomplices.That the complainant No. 2
although made a complaint to the PS DLF City, Phase-I, Gurugram, in December 2019, but no action
was taken by the police on the said complaint. On 26.01.2020, the daughter of the petitioner enquired
about the status of her above said complaint from the SHO PS DLF City, Phase-I, Gurugram and also
sought an appointment from him, by way of a WHATSAPP message, the said SHO replied to the
message of the daughter of the petitioner and said "I will call you back". The said SHO again messaged
the daughter of the petitioner on 01.02.2020 asking "Hi you matter soughted out or still pending",
System IP (311-3t):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 4/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (faitziTuTT Ili1 elidiact) It-4T)
3r2TaT ftvitt
(Um 154 tgil i, igdi *
which message was replied to in the negative by the daughter of the petitioner.That the accused in the
meanwhile, filed a false and fabricated complaint against the complainants to the Commissioner of
Police, Gurugram, dated 28.12.2019, vide DD No.1688-P, to set the police machinery in motion against
the complainants, to cause criminal intimidation, annoyance and insult to the complainants, with a view
to extort money from the complainants. The said complaint was forwarded to ACP (East) Gurugram,
vide diary No. 1222-5A. The complainants were called to the office of the ACP (East), Gurugram, on
30.12.2019, for enquiry, as the accused had falsely alleged in the said complaint that the complainants
had taken a sum of Rs. Two Crores from the accused and were not returning the same. The
complainants joined investigations and fully co-operated in the enquiry and after the office of ACP
(East), Gurugram was satisfied with the statements of the complainants and since no offence was made
out against the complainants, the complainants were allowed to leave and the investigation was
closed.That when the accused failed to get the complainants implicated in the above mentioned false
and fabricated complaint, the accused illegally and unlawfully, once again filed a fresh complaint dated
13.07.2020, vide DD No. 245-5D, against the complainants to the SHO PS Narwana City, District Jind,
Haryana. The accused has made contradictory and improvised allegations in the fresh complaint and the
accused has now alleged that the accused paid a sum of Rs. 2.80 Crores to the complainants, as against
the alleged sum of Rs. 1.25 Crores, as alleged in the earlier complaint dated 27.12.2019. The accused is
indulging in forum shopping and is unlawfully filing false and fabricated complaints against the
complainants, which has resulted in criminal intimidation, annoyance and insult to the complainants.
That the complainants are being entangled in false complaints, to extort money from the complainants.
That the accused is deliberately, intentionally and fraudulently embroiling the complainants in false and
fabricated cases and the accused needs to be booked and investigated for the false and fabricated
complaints. The accused needs to be booked for levelling false accusations and filing false complaints
against the complainants, for making a false and fabricated document causing criminal intimidation,
insult and annoyance, criminal intimidation by anonymous communications and administering threats
to cause death or grievous hurt to the complainants. The life, limb and liberty of the complainants are at
grave risk and the complainants fear for the safety of the same.In the premises it is humbly prayed that
an FIR may be registered against the accused under sections 182, 211, 464, 465, 503, 506(2), 507 IPC,
as the offences committed by the accused are cognizable, in the interest of justice. Shibani Parti W/o
Late Gautam Parti(Complainant No. 1)Mob. No. 9810730005Sana PartiD/o Late Gautam Parti
(Complainant No. 2) Mob. No. 9999005039Both residents of 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments,Gurugram,
Haryana. TZTTF 2-1TFT- 5)--1-41F awti- 3Tra1 altFtW 19.01.2021 .-4-114-neiq
MS (Sushma-1) Judicial magistrate first Class Gurugram/UID NO .HR0525 tiNT 156(3) CrPC
tTru 506 !PC 31T1R" 31f+7 c,(a it2-Tmr Er-{ 'gruff OA tr-{ 31frzita-r
3-"a" 31T1IT 31ita 1 4I oi!chi FIR CirdZir ct, c1 tgrWr
tHrAt-e. ai 3TV 3iftMtRit r#UT 3t- A
— t 7T Ter t ochei tp -44. th-rt-R a. 3R1R. 374.4U
3T 1I1TF ES! BAHIRAM a e) 14, 771 I zre- 31IRItur ES! BAHIRAM 1258 *211. 3tift2it
3iit7 f4. 41 71zif t I
System IP (31*):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 5/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (ZitziPITT triWR oidincr, 44-4T)
iiiirOgeptfo•
ii,T4 al I IA Li
(trru 154 tff vfozrr *Qcti * Fp)
13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.
(*f 71-zrt ct,144161 : .4,14) .34.64-ct 1Ia14Ifl# traT T-401c-11 ar'+- 311:MtT 4,(c1 wr (Act),
Tr.- 4. 2 4 5(yeitg * cf6ci t.):
(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation OW{1:7 71-4-r 3tk rir *
Rank 74): Asst. SI (Assistant
rAr 1 .ii 317111): or ( 1T) Sub-Inspector)
Directed (Name of 1.0.) 3ffI1 itt MT):
BAHI RAM
No. (It): 1258GGN to take up the Investigation (WI ITT 3TI1 tiT# A- AA- *
PA-e- 7rz10 or (ZIT)
Directed (Mobile No. of I.0.) (7tV 3rI Tf r 311-47g - ): 918368381770
Refused investigation due to (*V * rAv): or (* chliut *chii

ziT)
District (1? 1):
Transferred to P.S. (21WO:
on point of jurisdiction (WI ittiritM7
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded

and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost. (51"*TzTFWer /
14, ci M-1 VrATIW*1 ti 711t, rt44 FrAT AT -Y1:ft 1W% c'cti
51-wRruwer t irzft)
R.O.A.C. (3117.31t.V.#1.)
14. Signature of Officer in charge, Police

Station (trwr lauft * ctittri.)
System IP (3i1t):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 6/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (eftzrruTT 1 i ilding+ 44-4T)
-1,-,No c•
t;r2rxr iv-1o!
(tTRT 154 "3" Vitzir dI ii FP)
Signature / Thumb Name (FPT): Ajay Kumar

impression
of the complainant / Rank (rg): I (Inspector)
informant (t- W-RIWW-di /
Ict)ci /3i1 No. (*.): Insp
ilAlTr4)
15. Date and time of dispatch to the court (3IVFa 4 tisfur tr farlich
System IP (3-1it14'):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 7/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (fitziTuTT tl12Ar rimilct) it-4T)
41)11:141 PO, CS

vrtrrr 7L-4-41. itritt
(tm 154 sil ii iI i, * Ftra)
Attachment to item 7 of First Information Report (ATM ILVRT fWl * RZ 7 ticKdoei):
Physical features, deformities and other details of the suspect/accused: ( If known / seen)
(*fan. I a-ft.:pm arrflftw f fq' 3ltT 3T- 1 (Wit vtra tan wzrr))
S. No. Sex 0.4.n Date / Year Of Build (WWRIE) Height
(ems)
Complexion (tin Identification Mark(s) it174)
Birth (WM Mk
(* -4
/
(*.ft.))
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Male 1971
Is Proxitted: Yes
Deformities / Peculiarities Teeth (&) Hair (WW) Eye (3T4) Habit(s)(3Bra) Dress Habit (s)
/ faiiincia) (trrATZIO
8 9 10 11 12 13
Language/Dialect Place of PST Ftir4) Others (31- 1")

orrirrtat"
Burn Mark (7* 1,eucoderma Mole (TrizeT) Scar (11N) Tattoo (1 *T)
1e14) (crldb(ortc
vat))
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
These fields will be entered only if complainant/informant gives any one or more particulars about the suspect/accused.
(Mr 1117 Wet 44 fkkr 704' i1 flquqdq.cit I temptitier lefa-nr I 3II c1 * it * *fit triF zIT Telt 3T1 ontrbi tRT
System IP (31Ttt):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:52 8/8

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (gitznurr 10-41- itarT)
giur Tk1-4r ftcht
(trru 154 g vitzrr Trtar * FFF)
1- District (i —AT): JIND P.S. NARWANA CITY Year(*): 2021
FIR No. (14-.91t. 0115 Date (iArticti): 30/04/2021

23:08
2. S.No. Acts (311iff1 xf) Sections (tffigi))
1 IPC 1860 406

2 IPC 1860 420
3 IPC 1860 506
3. (a) Occurrence of offence (3TER1IT
Day (fta): Date from (ftffilF 11): Date To (itgilF FiF):
Time Period (1T7T11 317iit): Time From (WM it): Time To (Trifvf
(b) Information received at P.S. (MRT l T Date (Roi€1): Time (IP:17):

Tk-1--4r srma 30/04/2021 22:49 hrs
(c) General Diary Reference Entry No. elitfit Time (1:1717):
('0.ila1x4 I tat):
031 30/04/2021
22:49 hrs
4- Type of Information (torif TWM: Written
System IP (3t1et):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:21 1/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (FitzrTuff P71 ertidiRcp itaT)
-aryint
=Tr 7tWRT ftqtt
(tTriT 154 T Witzff *Om * FFR)
5. Place of Occurrence
(ticoittiol):
1. (a) Direction and distance from P.S. (ITTRT * t 3itT ittIT): SOUTH-EAST, 3.2 Km(s) Beat No. (ite•
(b) Address (WM: 6Rovii
(c) In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then Name of PS. (1:l1 tiMT ART * WW1 al 217-4T 1ST RUT):
District (State) (fa—AT (77- 1)):
6. Complainant / Informant (51-ffiTzTFWarr /
Name (1W): TA'ff tgcchs
Father's Name (Act APT): TT
Date/Year of Birth (7- 1' fa* / (d) Nationality ('(lib_ (icn): INDIA
1976
UID No. (VITIA
Passport No. (riTfItte
Date of Issue (77ft 54' fkfit): Place of Issue (Mt' W(4 WT FM):
(g) Occupation (ardITTz1):
Address Type (traT *T Address ( 1T)

TWR")
Present Address di el) 3 e4--- ar-{ NARWANA CITY,
JIND, HARYANA, INDIA
Permanent Address 3 er4WaTT NARWANA CITY,
JIND, HARYANA, INDIA
(1)
System IP (3*M:10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:21 2/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (fitzfruTT IrAT endi ch 44-0
ii,T4 I iittitt
MITI 154 VIPPIT Fra)
Phone number (VaTif Mobile (ai)en*ei

91-9416118433
7. Details of known / suspected / unknown accused with full particulars ( Ta' / Tifa-nr / 31 Fra
31fA7p7 rtt factiui l çj4111W):
S. No. Name (W) Alias (.540ia1) Relative's Name (fticlqii TRTTO

(W.#.)
1 frar-A- um-41- Husband's Name: ultd-X1 tITT-A
+101i trr-T-4'r Father's Name: Tta-31- 1:17-41-
zi2=T
4 tfp
5
•4u ci TTigcr
6 t -dT1
VcIcb,H
7 17-T
cr cr
9
8* Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant / informant (RM171-6Wer / too ichc-t Titit
i'141 ttt 4-4 wi-r0. *. croiuo:
System IP (31110:10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:21 3/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (fftziTuTT rg -it alidiRch t -aT)
. 4,1.n.•
TTT iv.' an 1141
(UM 154 IT% zrr 4•Qcu c16d)
9. Particulars of properties of interest (1:1-4i-tra" tia-Lirc-ci
S. No. Property Type (tie-Lirt"-ci * Sub Type (37 WI') Value(In Rs/-) (1t-74 (W
(W.T.r.)
10- Total value of property stolen (In Rs/-) (tt* tia"I ccl T 1 te-el(W 4)):
11. Inquest Report / U.D. case No., if any (4c- 1:1-AteT SALM / 01-31-+-7171- f., rfa- cf, 3 er):
S. No. UIDB Number (zOt.3r+-717T
12. First Information contents (WM *owl! 91-71.):
44,41 , 7F0 VTI-0 It° Tr-6)-Tzr #RT tqCch5 tio-e,1 UP- 652/20 dic41
3 61crldli a14c1kiI TTO- aTTFT ,7tIa1t t, T-4:r acI1
34. 7 --
d--a-trith-Tatt 2015 el gthd-xr 3ftT 3--4:ftr t
iTIA- AT V 419t et 11(1) ociNI ii i 3TE3r tqFkii T4:r-*
Tgru c44 317RT ;Trt ER- arr- r Awl urR--41 •TA-#
fAc-.11 441 AT crV tf TFRT 1-4.71.1÷r fd9h.H 30 Tit--d--Fr 2). 3.0 3-j-Td-ra
quick facilitator pvt.ltd. a1I 4 cl-;(404) tic1k Z). tita . titr 341T Tcr117 • 1171
faao- 31 T urwr .3-101+1 t 3117 NCR Iel" 3.fit 3117 $.1 Ag-It
-rch=t 1'4-Fe Ita-r - '17,---6t#11,4.4) 1÷11 oid1H-41 2T1- 2015 # oict cr-6-t
A.Z ER FIN-652/20 $R aldk 01,01611 # AA 8 cii a1cj 1-;14.41 ç.4dfllj AT 5/6
Tifp)- JO. 4 rii& Tcrrith-efciiI rri# op 12 eikg T return 31RIT ir 2015 tt
old ti ÷iFki 1-4,.71c41 t'W 3TT 24.1-1 gita--xr , 4-110-11 3tR fa-wxr k ch I it ta -U7
faaW -ri.4.)-1,U3 r *11 -z4r T ¶ 1tu -d-r 3tR t -it7

Erz. 2016 t +4 Tt 3fit iv 2)- 1 +10.) 1- 6.1-)•( 444)
.ich+f RI I aitT 3iTC4clI 10% 40% c1 fr arrzr WI- I
System IF (341t1t):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:21 4/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (TitznuTT ird -fr rild1114,
vtiagr itt4 rl I 11
(Um 154 z-ff AfPFT * civi)
+i•O•di # 4D. t3Th i f fi 3T171 oict -(4161 tit e- aitT mil

Pcb16 Tf--+- $4-1 cr-+- R- $,rs g:1-1- fa.,11÷1 4T{rUa itT.W
2016 A- 60 6IN Adl) 611c1d1i 01-411011 Trrzr
ER" 3171T irT4:1- AA 50 6IN (7)- 341- 1 ,-1‘1 1,4 t ER. ) sir 2017 # fITT
4 tITIT ftzrr dk4 4-ut1r-{ sio AT-zi • 1,+-i 3ft tia-ed 41.1-1 Sio trl- 2.1 3Ih- cri
# f#zrr zrr ait {- f474--47. 2017 # 70 (q IN ft-Trr f-a9N-1 3k fiTft
TM- Tr T -6-Fr Do-ioU .14, 4 t 1 4I
ciie4AA 70 T17E1 31T1-RTs " 3-t7T 31t ft ICICI 0-RdIcril A/C 358901500551
HDFC 4ch J-itgei C1301 0-t-tc1to1i A/C 50200032257848d4 HDR: 4c1i A/C 50200032260065
àii i c13a-r ,A•fl orh too ,slch 01k4loil A/C 358901500550# IMPS J-05
# atij 31T 30 c-HG 7 44- Ft!" 4 -91 =1'4 €.41141 Far Atir
f+-41" dJ IAA 1.80 W1t aich4 IaL Dolcht is4.4)1 Fa-a--{ur 3-11-T 3-41- 4-4J-144 Trt* tr-4-
TutiR- t --6- 1 .-drer ert•Zcilall Li co TM' 7 iz TF mg °HA al.(110-11 2)- 1 571*
Ats1 +11,41 411 Aa) ji c11+1 Itzrr #.1 ,4 gr cip 10/20 rti f'4-1:ht
Tat 21-r at 4- V ZT 1 i 4it Pchlei) 016) 3IY* øc id t a -r43-rri
at'r Eh-1A. c4 çfl 5)-dr-At t ç a1 arritrT sai .t -111- odNi f .3.frcrt
D+(.1-,1 ,u,i1 ai-FrTt ItFAr
Pcbc.i.-11 tft TTT d1II ra. A chN 788 EUR hdrc <I-115M .1.301 15
.3ics1cti1 2019 3-1t{ 010 Aci) 4,61 788 (70,000) # cmi tiff at 3F4 .4161 ck)
Vch Ult. 31TITte 3rrcr4" 1I Icti 3 "1- artq- t 1l dIl 1-4).4
TT Ti--+-fte-A- 01Fic1iolt HDFC 44, * #A-aT 44- fA--
gr 3ft-4- odNi fd, 788
EUR NO J 3ft-t- 4),0 c4iI 1-1 I 3.174. tl 1 I c1-, 4)(1 tur It
371-A. ch61 f 3-1TITTI3lt ti-FT (Remittance) 3-TPIT 3-41-Tt 4c4,
odp_41 4 1 --Fr dimd 3i-r-zrr 3 31T d-idialcrsi 061 9 arrcr--+- r
3-f- t3--d- 00-4 e ar -4--gr J1.) r cich 44, 31-itW1tzlt # old Fair eiel a-)61 1 TTTt.
,414 i i . 14wg 6411c1 gar at 37,---otA F itr Ild t 4161 3-11T
c4c1) f Halt clictc,41(. tt (+04, # 0130, 1,11,100-1 .41,31 oict t •--6"A"
System IP (3iitift):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:21 5/11

74T3 1'4,` HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (eitzfluTT VAT tffT)
trzi7c au II41
MIT 154 VittIT •tigcit Fre-)
c dII ft -ach TT* elcildl g er $cri 1-g-n- lt-A- cVIIRQ Trafr trt grt 71. old
ei --4:rt stk cf-, T 31TItTr/EIT S-449 GK 1: -CzAT
ci;L-104) 1 3-i-rftu t AftF .161 f#.-4I 1A- arli4R fa -rAlr
4,61 1ETl-ftF. AtIT"). e)d) 347 Nrcrwr artru-rr
c c 1a IlC isi# AT Ail e4-c1 gk c1k Eg d IQ) d6i ai i At+7 15tRr 347 F4 cts;€
t -4" Ttita" r tTc1 r Trar ciAd 4:1,71 it-c4r
- 17 c1i 2019 -1
ii iiI ci61 Jvi Tft-d-3:1- 3ft-4- tf'6-a- PTA- 10/12 3frerzit TM' f#A- trt'r
c4K tr 61-di A. 4,61 14, 3-rrurtr TF ii 7 farri 3T-- T 2 I- 1(4 ,AH)dir 3•117" t
ctI 3iPcR-ct itzIT #itA 1 016) AZET T#T- 3TPTA G14-cl TEM IITTAt T
c)..) *1- Q dI4-41 c1hal cI61 51-41-A- Tilt.)- .16 Old 0-16) tt- Tpt ea-Pr wr
377--r,r aft ch r 311Lic;) IA 3110 $.k4 Ole, 70 ,AN 60tht zyrA-
AZ)- AT 3-1TA. Wat 50 at --aft 90 ii 0•F) ci3c4 . --J-ral-ar 14 rrZg .3t-Nlcvd ziift
3-1rt T4:rt IIc 3-fta-p- chI J4I c.id) 3T3-Trt CIO 4TEta- Ilia) old I
0130,+14-Iz1 lIc# e,1 d TitaTf ER- elA g-rtr 4,4-11.k
317. f -arA)-/ „k-ioi TT i 01,161•L 1"+-41- .31-T 1161 it
.16) AT 1
- ---o-ru 14), g=r 3.1-HT .-161 9tqFtdIJ 11'01 ad) ER- P.1, (4c4
(to, f'd-firA-Ntrizr 3rrzrr a). Tita-Tr Et-ffrt34 T77:1. T-T
c-1 (1 Ttr aft-{. 3-FA- 4,61 ft A- -R171)- TrxrrtrrA- ch,cal .1111 trt. facii A T31-
1---grzrr al-$- 1- tT 61c04 .1k41 AT •F-IJ-1511.) cdi cn 3171-T7 IA go dizn t AT
T-FA" eidil ft at cse, cfic Ro lQdtt I $'dc iI KK TT 141).1 3Trzrr 14, l'a-fi rcr-4ficr
qT-6-rt 4-# crNd101 MT I cfp aicid--.“ 2019 A. at{
9) 31Tz1T i a-ftct cri cw4) 31-1- 11T31 1 TF-6-ft 3Trtr t 1 IA- ci6I ATA ch
(t-urr ) Trrtr. ci61 apt 5/6 3.17Tit Trizi f 3417tr Ct)I d I 01
1
11- . -p;Hm-cfl Trrso - qifi7. t chi(u! c fr rñ T ci imr
,110.1 eildi c161 3.1-13T tqg gtr 34t7- cnidm ci61 at die) at 31-4. d1 -lI'd tI
)- 71)- c1161 f .31-q cI3t.% .16) fPr-43-rr AT tr-p-- r V .1161 14) 3Th ‘1 -(r
Fgrt zrr-ff 3171 q-gt Trrn ad! YtT t -o-A cvl (14-1 06) ,dIal I
IP (3-iftt):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:22 6/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (OA-Muff IPIT aildiRch 44M)
ciirn ii,tirn 4
(VRT 154 e16d)
TTritt T)" TPTitr cich tl ft trm 6.111 T-TA- t" trr

$411 1 -Tra- fig-n- ,4.4 .3c5Ich,k 4)1 xttt -(ch,H
29.10.2020 Acq ttintr-gt
31RIferal. trm TA(-4,41i .:HicHe) 114 3T 31 ci chl c116) 0-I6) c 3-ra- 3f1r#
f4) ø1 fi 1-8614, (sid ci-dzIcti6) 341T
tritaR t 1101 I Taff tt sAid 3c1-c1 Trfl- ,(1,4-1 Q-11z)
T41fr9 gr --gRrr .3-1H) 2016 2018 dcb MITA" .7110-1 cr-6-4T1 c1Ic 311R. T -a 3TcrA- 1414-1
AT 44, d cfr i 2.80 W-4)- - f?, I D. -, 4o, grat 4:1 11-t# 1. icici
01.01011 tqlcil tUTT - TAT tgGcl-)5 A/C r 358901500551, 2. ICICI act,
- {1C.ch5 A/C - 164905000244, 3. [en cr, rZ1T9Tq-117-W - TT* chs A/C -
164901500679, 4. HDFC 44) -T TZgC0115 A/C - 5010024323439, 5. HDFC
445 urar TAW c.1, 5 A/C - 50200032257848, 6. HDFC 4ch tri-{W -
T*T tqc (4, 5 AJC - 50200032260065, 7. ICIC14- attc11.-11 icii -7411-a. ik-fl A/C -
358901500550, 8. c)ch 31P:F 01RclIa11 (11c11 -- trAtT A/C -42260100001569, f- -drAt
7R-41 fdtl-dT taTT gift Tit. 9810730005 J-ichicri r0 101/7 itcFaT 31lT71- TjTa
DLF 73Tial 41 I crl 77-41- 1g. T-40 31td-F1 17-41- .. Do/ J-ichicrt T0 S-449 ,GK-
1 ert tc--41 Tit0 34664027287 whatsapp/ ic1 1 J-Ichtcrt f0 235 d cHisei
ittrjra - TTr3=I 77171' Tr1-0 8800343774/ ta71-7/t4-4T Tit0
442033185161 whatsapp/*.*. t---Ofd7 Ug-T gpuirg/TA , 3#0 9810557788/ li f4- 11;1-4Trf
chic-Ilei Tit° 7206363953/ I 1 choilei to 8699804004/ T• Tra V.A-1
74T1 1- ci6c1 T44 ttITIT T5**1- 2.80 ch-T1--g 6.51-1 i t.! a 3ras1lo1 PRA- tl-
(-)" Ramesh 13/4/21 i1 ch T •GA-)5 IAA 7441 , 1,1-1 -652/20 dIell 3
Q0-1dH, atar-0` . T. 9416118433 tritag --Fatt 1832-
P 17.04.2021 (s4.311. 41 slch ZITT kAiLd Tr7g-a- ti AA A.( tUTI
406,420,506 1PC T 9T -11.) IT{ ta-4d-n M 115 lci 30.04.2021 q1137
406,420,506 IPC T19T 15•4 doA f+-711- sylicii•( FIR cn
8Ich 641C.11 r7 -rz1a1'ti crichcl J-H4 3R:17 et.(491,(-d
System IP (aitit):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:22 7/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (ertziTuTT VAT wildilAct) ltan
Pc1
VTR 1 11 l 1Wtc
(UM 154 Vit7TT *Octi ci6ci)
3117TP# atFANT fl dI I 31Ts -

T a 7F J'RT 3-1TI7 c-11
13. Action taken: Since the above information reveals commission of offence(s) u/s as
mentioned at Item No. 2.
(*1 11-41' 4)1 ci16) : 1\
14) LI 'Tar tl 1dI f 3717tt cbi.)
N•7I I Ct4 cI lclI
3,14* r. 2 et rel (S1 tiM * cl6c1 t.):

(1) Registered the case and took up the investigation
FA' fAin 7Tz1T): or ( 710
(r,r-.--,Tir
Rank ('T): SI (Sub-Inspector)
(2) Directed (Name of I.0.) (* 4- 311:tWat T M3:0:

GURMAIL SINGH
No. (4.): 176 to take up the Investigation 3-i -4A Tirir #A-
FA. 1 r f 1T 171T) or (40
Directed (Mobile No. of I.0.) (71.1-4* 3TitrWat r 3:11-4Tfg 919416948686
(3) Refused investigation due to (7fq * FA): or (* chRui ct)ii

District (I? el 0:
zro
(4) Transferred to P.S. (ITTRT):
on point of jurisdiction (.+1
F.I.R. read over to the complainant / informant, admitted to be correctly recorded

and a copy given to the complainant /informant, free of cost. (W- TzEdWer /
itxiolcbcii 1:rrtr1I*r 7rzfr, Trwr 3Ir tr qfl fi i
1W-+-rz1--+—er 4't 7rzit)
R.O.A.C. (3117.31t.V.At.)
14.
System IF (311$'1i):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:22 8/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (FitziTTITT rifAi i1kqTlan
mra l.1IftErlt
(UM 154 '43' VfOLIT mgcli * Fre)
Signature / Thumb Signature of Officer in charge, Police

impression Station (MIT 11T * ffalliT)
of the complainant /
informant (51VIzraWat I Name (IM): Dharambir Singh
virtichct * FFMATT /310
Rank (T): I (Inspector)
Wi %en-4)
No. (it): KR16
15. Date and time of dispatch to the court (31-41—ga OM l irtict)

Trgzr):
Attachment to item 7 of First Information Report (STIWIT 1:0-4T fttitt * 71-C 7 *teidgigt):
Physical features, deformities and other details of the suspect/accused: ( If known/ seen)
(*try. / 3TitrT47f fte, faqtfAql 3It 3mr farm oft 7TrF / tan Trarrll
S. No. Sex 02471) Date / Year Of Build (WFTWE) Height Complexion (in) Identification Mark(s) (tnr4Ta itKr)
(WA) Birth (7Wf Wit (cms)
(War
I *)
(*A.))
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I Female
Is Proxitted: Yes
2 Female
Is Proxitted: Yes
3 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
4 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
5 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
6 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
7 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
System IP (31T4t):10.88.233.142 28/10/202118:03:22 9/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (flzrTuTT I11I oidinco #41')
.1,na Pol co
7L-4Fr itErtt
(tTru 154 g ePrr •tacti * Fga)
8 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
9 Male
Is Proxitted: Yes
Deformities / Peculiarities Teeth (el-e) Hair (WM) Eye (314) Habit(s)(3Trc) Dress Habit (s)
(fattPtil / 111.1.cca) ( zirgre)
8 9 10 11 12 13
Language/I )i. Place of (VT ftITR) Others (NMI)

(strwrial-41)
Burn Mark (70' Leucoderma Mole (3178T) Scar (Ma) Tattoo (7kt IF *7)
wr fAcio) ( tat(Tr0-4
int)
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
System IP (31T/11):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:22 10/11

HARYANA POLICE CITIZEN SERVICES (e1t7Tiun ilf4Tr 1:1-40
AIM wi
(UM 154 A),- LIT * FP')
'these fields will be entered only if complainant/informant gives any one or more particulars about the suspect/accused.
(zftr ttti Fift ittr 7rOt zit 57*-1-zraW-dt / ttuo vat tadh I 3iiitzp7 * zrr 37rtr .11.1.1, 1 tar t)
System IP (3ftft):10.88.233.142 28/10/2021 18:03:22 11/11

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M- OF 2022
Shibani Parti & anr. ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and anr ...Respondents
INDEX
SR. PARTICULARS DATED PAGES COURT

NO. FEE
1. Petition U/s 482 02.05.2022
Cr.P.C.
. Affidavit
3. ANNEXURES
P-1: FIR No.115. 30.04.2021 r
P-2: Complaint. First 27-12-19
filed by Respondent 2
P-3: Complaint filed 13-07-2020
at Narwana by
respondent 2
P-4: The undertaking
by the Respondent
no. 2.
P-5: FIR by Petitioner 25.01.2021
1
P-6: WhatsApp Chat
between Petitioner 1
and Respondent 2
P-7: Undertaking by
Petitioner no. 2
P-13: Identity Proof of 29.06.2014
the Petitioners.
Vakalatnama
Total Court Fee: /-

H
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 02.06.2022
(MAHIMA SINGH) (ABHIMANYU SINGH)

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
COUNSELS FOR THE PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. OF 2022

MEMO OF PARTIES
1. SHIBANI PARTI aged 49 years Wife of Late Gautam
Parti; resident of House no.- 101/7, Silver Oak
Apartments, DLF PHASE-1, Sikanderpur Ghosi (68),
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122002.
2. SANA PARTI aged 29 years Daughter of Late Gautam

Parti; resident of House no.- 101/7, Silver Oak
Apartments, DLF PHASE-1, Sikanderpur Ghosi (68),
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122002.
...Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Haryana;
2. Ramesh Khatkad son of Sh. Chanda Ram resident of
H.No. 652/20, Gali No. 3, Hari Nagar, Narwana, District
Jind, Haryana.
...Respondents
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 30.05.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.0 for
quashing of FIR No.115, dated 30.04.2021
under section 406,420,506 IPC, 1860
(ANNEXURE P-1) registered at Police Station
Narwana City and all the subsequent
proceedings enumerated thereof qua the
petitioners as the instant mentioned FIR is
3rd such vexatious attempt, to falsely frame
the petitioners by the complainant in spite of
advance foreclosure of his previous
complaint with the ECONOMIC OFFENCES
WING, in this regard.
The humble prayer is that during the
pendency of the present petition the
proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR
(Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner may kindly
be stayed, in the interest of justice.
AND
Any other order or direction which this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper
keeping in view the peculiar facts and
circumstances of the present case, may be
passed.
3
PRELIMINARY SUBMISSIONS
1. The petitioner no. 1 is a law abiding, respectful citizen,
a widow trying to make ends meet after having
prematurely lost her husband to Cancer in 2019, while
petitioner no. 2 is her daughter, who had been involved
in her studies at the time of the alleged offence.
2. The Petitioners are totally unrelated to the respondent
no. 2 and had only first met him in July 2019, when he
urged petitioner no. 1 to meet her husband who was on
his death bed at that time.
3. Respondent no. 2 has filed the present complaint upon
his failure of being able to frame the petitioners and late
Gautam Parti in two former complaints dated 27-12-19
filed at Gurugram (Annexure-P2) and 13-07-2020 filed
at Narwana (Annexure-P3), respectively. It is notable,
that while petitioner no. 2 finds no mention in Annexure
P-1 since the respondent no. 2, her name is cleverly
included in the second complaint to fulfil his ulterior
motives.
4. While Respondent no. 2 has left no stone unturned to
abuse the process of law and the present FIR has
admittedly been filed upon the forclosure of his
complaint filed on 29-10-2020 with the EOW, upon
rigorous investigation in the matter.

4
5. Bare perusal of the three complaints by respondent no.
2, suffices the inference that the said FIR is not only
fabricated but is also full of surmises and conjectures
and is absolutely devoid of substance.
6. Petitioner no. 1 is a victim of the circumstance and lives
under constant threat of harassment and humiliation
by the respondents for no fault of hers
RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That, respondent no. 2 has filed a false and frivolous
FIR no. 115 of 2021 U/s 406,420 and 506 of IPC
1860 the true contents of which have been
reproduced below for reference:
"I Ramesh Khatkad, am a resident of H.No. 652/20, Gali No. 3,

Hari Nagar, Narwana, District Jind, Haryana. I am a frequent
visitor overseas and I also work as a Yoga Instructor in
Russia. I had first met late Gautam Para along with his wife
Shibani Parti, in January-February 2015 at Delhi Airport
where they told me about their business in Delhi and
overses. Thereafter, we visited each other's homes many a
time and later Gautam introduced me to Vikram Kashyap
and said they were business partners. Vikram and Gautam
were friends and ran a company named Quick Facilitators
Pvt. Ltd in Gurgaon, Wherein the directors were Rohit Puri
and Ranjit Kashyap who proclaimed that they had great
business overseas and in Delhi. They showed me a list of
many people who had invested in their company. In 2015
when they first visited my home in Narwana, I hasd paid 8
Lakh Cash to them. I received a net profit of about 4 lakh in
5-6 months i.e. I received a return of about 12 Lakh in the
Summer of 2015, which was all dealt with in cash. Gautam,
Shivani, Sana and Vikram said Devraj looks after the
5
overseas business and Rohit Puri runs the India business.

Gautam and Shivani along with Rohit Puri visited me at my
home in Narwana during the winter of 2016. All of them
provoked me to invest into their business and committed an
income of 10-40%. They also said the company is registered
with the government and that you can invest or withdraw
your money at your own ease so, I further gave 60 Lacs to
them when Gau tam and Vikram visited my home in
Narwana, thereafter I paid a sum of 50 Lakh in June 2017
also at my residence in the presence of Rand hir S/ o Natthu
Ram and Chanda ram S/ o Kishan lal who had taken me in
their confidence. Then, in December 2017, I paid 70 Lakh
which was received by Rohit who was sent by Vikram and
Shivani. All of these always advised me to caary out the
whole business in cash. Thereafter, I sent 70 Lakh Online
through my ICICI account no. 358901500551, HDFC Bank
Model town Narwana Bank account no. 50200032260065,
my wife's Bank account ICICI Account no. 358901500550
through IMPS. I also sent 30 Lac to some other company
account in Dubai (Record attached) I effected cash
transaction of about 1.80 Crore in the presence of Randhir
Singh and Chanda Ram. Thereafter if I asked for a refund
they said if you withdraw now you might lose your money. I
called Vikram and Shivani every now and then who then
used to inform me that they have deputed one Devender@
Raj on task for me, who will provide me the amount that I
ask for. Raj transferred about 788 Euros to my account to
which I objected but he said, let's first withdraw a small
amount so that your company gets attached to the company
and then the further transactions can be smooth. When I
went to meet my bank manager I told him that 788 euros
have just landed in my bank account and that a lot of my
money is about to come. The bank manager then prompted
that this money has been sent through unlawful means and
that I can't withdraw it and that I should never in future
accept money through such means. Ifurther spoke with bank
authorities in Delhi as well who reiterated the same. When I
tried to talk to Shivani and Vikram regarding this, they said
6
the delay in my money is due to some problem on

government side. Raj further said I'll let you know after
discussion. Few months passed in this vicious cycle.
Thereafter I reached at Vikram's office on the given address,
i.e.the registered address S-449 Greater Kailash, New
Delhi but I found no one. Shivani assured me that Rohit will
soon call me with reagrds to my money and you'll receive all
your money. After a few days my friend and I went to the
said office in Greater Kailash where I met their servant and
then Rohit Puri called in some time and asked me to come to
Emporio Mall, Vasant Kunj on 17th July 2019. Gautam and
Rohit Puri had come there along with 10-12 men and we had
a lot of argument whereafter they said to me that I'll get my
money within 7 days surely. I didn't get anything even
thereafter so I along with my friend went to Gautam Parti's
residence to recover my money but Shivani didn't even speak
with us properly. Thereafter Gautam called and said you will
get your money from tomorrow onwards. Thereafter once
70000, thereafter 50000INR at once 90000 at other time,
amounting . to a total of 14 Lakh received in my
abovementioned account. Hereinafter, Gautam started
staying very ill and His wife Shivani started to avoid me.
Thereafter I went to Gautam's home where Shivani and Sana
said if you come here again we'll have you eliminated. As
soon as I left from there I received a phone call from
Vipin/ Pradeep of Karnal who claimed to be a friend of
Gautam's and Vikram Kashyap's and said he can facilitate
our compromise. One day Vipin invited me to a hotel in
karnal and said that your money has all been lost and now
he will, arrange for some money for me. Then, KK called that
Vipin and Bunty are coming to Narwana to return my money.
After some time in November 2019 Bunty and Vipin called me
to say that I must meet them on Narwana Canal to return my
money. When I went there with my friend Krishan Kumar,
we discovered they were 5-6 men who attempted to coerce
us into signing papers they had got. Upon hearing the ruckus
many people came from nearby and so the men with Vipin
ran away leaving the papers there itself that I had collected.
7
thereafter they said, now you'll not get anything from us and
you don't know what we can do, we have topnotch approach
in the system. These people always had the intention of
fraudulently earning money from me and it is with this
intention that these people took my trust for a ride and
committed fraud on me. On 29.10.2020, i had filed a
complaint regarding this fraud in the Economic cell Wing but
the police along the accused hide the matter and did not take
proper action. So, i humbly request you to take immediate
action against these people by registering a case. And, my
family's life and property should be protected and the said
amount should be recovered from the culprits. And my
justice should be given to me by borrowing from my
acquaintances and from my own and bank accounts from
2016 to 2018. Gave people's accounts from which money
was given 1. ICICI BANK Nawrana Bank Holder- Ramesh
Khatkar A/c 358901500551 2. ICICI BANK Delhi account
holder - Ramesh khatker A/c: 164905000244, 3. ICICIBank
Delhi Account Holder - Ramesh Khatkar A/c-164901500679.
4. HDFC Bank Narwana Account- Ramesh Khatkar A/c
501002433439, 5. HDFC Bank Narwana Account Holder
Ramesh Khatkar A/c 502000300578486. 6. HDFC Bank
Narwana Account Holder Ramesh khatkar A/c
50200032260065, 7. ICICI Bank Narwana Account Holder
Parveen Rani A/c 358901500550, 8 Bank of Baroda
Nawrana Account Holder dharamveer A/c
42260100001569, Shivani Parti widow Gautam parti
Address...Do/ Vikram Kashyap house no. s-449, GK-1 new
delhi Mo. 34664027287 whatsapp / Rohit puni House no.
235 new green model town Jaidhar/ Ranjit Kashyap
Gurugram Mo. 8800343774/ devraj/ devender vishwakarma
delhi mo. 442033185161 whatsapp / k. o Kshitij Khattar
gurugram/ Delhi mo. 9810557788/ vipin/ Pradeep Karnal
Mo. 7206363953/ Bunty Karnal Mo. 8699804004. All these
people are working together in a conspiracy. Under this, by
cheating and fraud, grabbed 2.80 crores and now threatens
to kill me. sd ramesh 13/4/ 21 petitioner ramesh khatkar son
chanda ram house-652/20 street no. 3 Harinagar, narwana
8
District Jind Mo. 9416118433. Aj, Police station, on receipt of

the above complaint number 1832P dated 17.04.2021 in
Bajaria postal station. on being found to be involved in the
crime with section 406, 420, 506 IPC from the forceful
request. 115 dated 30.04.2021 section 406, 420, 506 IPC
Police station Narwana Registered Reg. After doing this, a
computerizrd copy of FIR will be prepared and send to the
service of Bajaria postal officer bala. The original request for
copying Michal Police has been kept for further investigation.
Whose in-depth investigation will be implemented."
2. That the only intention behind the said FIR is to extort
money while attempting to malign and tarnish the
clean image of the petitioners which they command
in the vicinity where they live in, have been falsely
implicated by the complainant who had filed a
complaint with the oblique motive to harass and
humiliate the present petitioners, without probing
the contents of the complaint the same has been
translated into an FIR No.115, dated 02.06.2019
under section 406,420 and 506 IPC, 1860 registered
at Police Station Narwana at the statement of
respondent no.
On these allegations FIR under section 406, 420, 506
IPC was registered against the petitioners. True
translation of copy of FIR is being annexed herewith as
ANNEXURE P-1 for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble
Court.
9
3. That, there are major lags between the various versions
narrated by respondent no. 2/complainant which
becomes clear upon perusal of his first complaint
Annexure P2, wherein he only brings up the name of
Gautam Parti that too at a much later stage in Para
10 Where he alleges that the affidavit that Vipin and
Bunty had called him at a hotel where they asked
him to sign an affidavit which contained the name of
Gautam Parti, nowhere mentioned earlier.
4. That, this former version of the
complainant/Respondent no. 2 shows manifold
contrast:
a) While the previous affidavit is alleged to have presented
to respondent no. 2 by Vipin and Bunty at the hotel,
however in P3 it is rather allegedly presented to the
respondent amidst a ruckus on Narwana Canal (an
open area) where the members of the public seemed to
have gathered leading to the running away of Vipin and
Bunty with unsigned affidavit left behind, to be
produced as an insufficient evidence later.
b) While in Annexure P1 there is no mention of respondent
no. 2 along with his family ever visiting the petitioners
at their home, Annexure P2 clearly describes his visit at
the home of the petitioners upon the death of
Petitioner's no.l's Husband on 10.12.2021

10
c) While P1 is a clear attempt at fabrication to involve the
name of petitioner no. 2 there is not even the slightest
whisper about Petitioner no. 2 in P2 for the simple
reason that respondent no. 2 wasn't aware about her
d) While there is no mention of how respondent no. 2 had
first met petitioner no. 1 and her late husband,
Annexure P1 exhibits a classic case of concoction
whereby there is no proof of the meeting whatsoever,
also for the very reason that petitioner no. 1 had not
travelled a lot.
5. That, owing to another intermittent complaint made by
respondent no. 2 with the Economic Offences Wing, a
thorough investigation was conducted by the police
inspector named Satish Kumar (+91 7015019080)
along with three other officers( dressed in uniform)
visited our residence on 18-01-2021. They
interrogated us (me and my daughter) for more than
4-6 hours. They took all our papers, took our
statements as well. The matter was thereafter closed
in the absence of any substance whatsoever.
6. That, While respondent no. 2 has concealed the material
fact of having visited petitioner no. 2's residence to
threaten her and extort money out of her, it becomes
clear upon viewing the undertaking given by him to
the Gurugram Police in that Regard. (Annexure P4)

11
7. That, It is a matter of enquiry that husband of petitioner
no.2 never ran a business of his own and was rather
an employee in a firm named M/s PROFAC Pro
Facilities Pvt. Ltd., in Gurugram where the said Rohit
Puri happened to be his subordinate and though the
former did meet respondent no. 2 indirectly once or
twice it was purely on social grounds.
8. That, the company by the name of Quick Facilitators
Private Limited by virtue of which the alleged
investment of money by respondent no.2 is said to
have happened, actually seems to have only been
registered 5.1 years ago i.e. on 10th April and 2017
and has nothing to do with the petitioners. The
complaint has been filed by the petitioner no. 1 on
25.01.2021 (Annexure-5).
9. That, the whatsapp chats of petitioner no. 1 with
respondent no. 2 (Annexure P6) are sufficient to
show that the respondent no.2 has taken the
situation of an ailing widow- a single mother, the
deceased husband of whose may have happened to
form acquaintance with the latter somehow, to his
advantage by even trespassing in her personal space
at times. The only fault of petitioner no. 1 here is that
she has cooperated with the investigating agency
being a law abiding citizen and has largely
accommodated the requests of respondent no. 2 on

12
humanitarian grounds, mostly being the victim of
circumstances
10. That, the situation at petitioner no. l's hand had
gone out of hand hence her daughter petitioner no. 2
was compelled to call the police helpline at 100,
wherein the police had to come and intervene in the
matter. On this occasion petitioner no. 2 had also
signed an undertaking (Annexure P7) before the
Police personnels clearly stating that the said
persons are approaching the petitioners with ulterior
motives and that they have conducted themselves in
an unlawful manner by entering the house of the
petitioners.
11. That, the petitioners had never in their life been to
Narwana/Jind, native place of respondent no. 2 until
recently in 2021 and so all the claims of respondent
no. 2 of the petitioners having visited his native place
many times are devoid of merit especially in the
absence of evidence whatsoever and will fall flat on
face even on the slightest of enquiry.
12. That, the said region of the State of Haryana is ill-
famed for the operations of such gangs that only
function to extort money out of innocent, respectful
and law abiding citizens wherever opportune.
13. That the Honble Apex Court in case titled as State of
Haryana and others V/s Chaudhary Bhajan Lal &

13
Other, cited as 1991 (1) RCR (Cril) 383" laid down
some parameters for quashing the FIR the Hon'ble
Court has held as follows:-
In the backdrop of the interpretation of the various
relevant provisions of the code under Chapter XIV and
of the principles of law enunciated by this court in a
series of decisions relating to the exercise of the
extraordinary power under Article 226 or the inherent
powers under Section 482 of the Code which we have
extracted and reproduced above, we given the following
categories of cases by way of illustration wherein such
power could be exercised either to prevent abuse of the
process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of
justice, though it may not be possible to lay down any
precise, clearly defined and sufficiently channelized and
inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an
exhaustive list of myriad kinds of cases wherein such
power should be exercised.
i. Where the allegations made in the First
Information report or the complaint, even if they
are taken at their face value and accepted in their
entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence
or make a case against the accused.
ii. Where the allegations in the First information
report and other materials if any, accompanying
the F.I.R. do not disclose a cognizable offence,

14
justifying an investigation by police officers under
section 156 (1) of the Code except under an order
of Magistrate within the purview of section 155 (2)
of the Code.
iii. Where the uncontroverted allegations made in the
FIR or complaint and the evidence collected in
support of the same do not disclose the
commission of any offence and make out a case
against the accused.
iv. Where, the allegations in the FIR do not constitute
a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-
cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by
a police officer without an order of a Magistrate as
contemplated under Section 155 (2) of the Code.
v. Where the allegations made in the F.I.R. or
complaint are so absurd and inherently
improbable on the basis of which no prudent
person can ever reach a just conclusion that there
is sufficient ground for proceedings against the
accused.
vi. Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in
any of the provisions of the Code or the concerned
Act (under which a criminal proceedings is
instituted) to the institution and continuance of
the proceedings and or where there is a specific
provision in the Code or the concerned Act,

15
providing efficacious redress for the grievance of
the aggrieved party.
vii. Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly
attended with malafide and/or where the
proceeding is maliciously instituted with an
ulterior motive for, wreaking vengeance on the
accused and with a view to spite him due to
private and personal grudge.
medical or any other documentary proof showing
that fact that at any point at time she ( respondent no.2)
was beaten by the petitioners or her husband, therefore,
the particular offence of 323 is nowhere found to be
happen couple with other offence mentioned in the FIR.
17. That in view of the law lay down by the Honble Apex
Court in the above mention cases, the present FIR is
liable to be quashed qua the petitioners. As regard the
offence u/s 406,420 and 506 of IPC, the allegations by
the respondent no.2 do not reveal the same as his own
various versions are contravening. The proceedings in
pursuance of the FIR are abuse the process of court, as
if the allegations made in the FIR even if they are taken
at their face value and accepted entirety do not prima-
facie constitute any offence. It is worthwhile to mention
here that the ingredient of offence mention u/s 406,420
and 506 of IPC is not meted out from the contents of the
16
FIR, Annexure P1, therefore, to secure the end of justice
the present FIR is liable to be quashed.
18. Therefore, due to the circumstances narrated above the
present FIR is liable to be quashed.
19. That if the proceedings in the above said FIR (P-1) shall
be allowed to continue, in that eventuality the petitioners
for none of their fault will have to suffer inspite of their
even not being remotely involved in the allegations
depicted in the FIR (Annexure P-1) by giving criminal
colour. Moreover, the facts narrated above will reveal
that the complaint has been filed by the complaint with
vendetta and malafide intentions. The FIR (Annexure P-
1) is sheer abuse to the process of law and continuance
of the proceedings on the basis of ANNEXURE P-1 will
cause unnecessary mental and physical harassment to
the petitioners.
20. That the petitioner has not filed any other criminal
petition on the same or similar grounds either in this
Hon'ble Court or in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
PRAYER
a. Petition under section 482 of Cr.P.0 for quashing of FIR
No.115, dated 30.04.2021 under section 406,420,506
IPC, 1860 (ANNEXURE P-1) registered at Police Station
Narwana City and all the subsequent proceedings
enumerated thereof qua the petitioners as the instant
mentioned FIR is 3rd such vexatious attempt, to falsely

• 17
frame the petitioners by the complainant in spite of
advance foreclosure of his previous complaint with the
ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, in this regard.
b. With a further prayer that during the pendency of the

present petition the proceedings arising out of the
impugned FIR (Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner may
kindly be stayed, in the interest of justice.
c. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Curt

may deem fit and proper keeping in view the peculiar
facts and circumstances of the present case.
It is further prayed that Petitioner may kindly be

exempted from filing the certified copies of Annexures,
in the interest of justice.
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 01.06.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
IS
ADVOCATES
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH
CRM M- OF 2022
Shibani Parti 86 anr. ...Petitioners
Versus
Affidavit of SHIBANI PARTI aged 49 years
Wife of Late Gautam Parti; resident of House
no.- 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments, DLF
PHASE-1, Sikanderpur Ghosi (68), Gurgaon,
Haryana - 122002. I, the abovenamed
deponent do, hereby solemnly affirm and
declare as under:
1. That the deponent is filing accompanying petition before

this Hon'ble Court which is likely to succeed on the
grounds taken therein.
2. That the contents of the petition have been read over to

the deponent, which are true and correct to the
knowledge of the deponent and no part of it is false and
nothing has been concealed therein.
3. That no such or similar petition has earlier been filed by

the petitioner either in this Hon'ble Court or in the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 02.06.2022
19
VERIFICATION:-
Verified that the contents of para no. 1 to 20 of my
above affidavit are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and no part of it is false and nothing material has
been concealed therein.
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 01.06.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
137
CRM-M-25893-2022
Decided on: 06.06.2022
Shibani Parti and another

. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
PRESENT: Ms. Mahima Singh, Advocate

for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashok K. Sharma (Bhana), Advocate

for respondent No.2.
****
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the instant petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn. .
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)

JUDGE
June 06, 2022
J.Ram
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

Whether Reportable: Yes/No
1 of 1
::: Downloaded on - 06-06-2022 20:00:53
HRJN010035492022
12 El
In the Court of Subhash Chander Sroai, Addl. Sessions Judge, Jind.

(UID:HR0494)
C.I.S. (B.A.) No.935 of 2022

Date of Institution: 12.7.2022
Arguments heard on: 14.7.2022
Date of Order: 14.7.2022
(1) Shibani Parti aged 49 years wife of late Gautarn Parti; resident of
House No.101/7, Silvar Oak Apartments, DLF Phase-1,
Sikanderpur Goshi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana-122002;
(2) Sana Parti aged 29 years daughter of late Gautam Parti; resident
of House.101/7, Silvar Oak Apartments, DLF Phase-1,
Sikanderpur Goshi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana-122002;
...Applicant-petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
FIR No.115 dated 30.4.2021

Under Sections: 406, 420,506 IPC
Police Station: Narwana City.
•• ••
Bail application under Section 438 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973.
••••
Present: Shri Gaurav Gupta, counsel for the applicants-petitioners.
Shri Neeraj Attri, Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by
Shri R.K.Sharma, Advocate for the complainant.
ORDER:
This order shall dispose off an application for bail under
(Subhash Chander Sroai)

ASJ, Jind. (UID: HR0494)
14.7.2022
CNR No.HRJN010035492022 B.A. CIS No.935-2022
Shibani Parti etc. Versus State of Haryana

2
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by applicants-
petitioners (1) Shibani Parti aged 49 years wife of late Gautam Parti;
resident of House No.101/7, Silvar Oak Apartments, DLF Phase-1,
Sikanderpur Goshi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana-122002 and (2)Sana Para
aged 29 years daughter of late Gautam Parti; resident of House.101/7,
Silvar Oak Apartments, DLF Phase-1, Sikanderpur Goshi (68), Gurgaon,
Haryana-122002, in case FIR No.115 dated 30.4.2021 under Sections
406,420,506 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station, Narwana City.
2- Notice of the bail application was given to the respondent-
State. Learned PP for the State has put his appearance on behalf of the
respondent-State. Reply filed.
3- The present case FIR No.115 dated 30.4.2021 under
Sections 406,420,506 of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Narwana City,
has been registered on the complaint of Ramesh Khatkar, son of Chanda
Ram, resident of H.No.652/20 Gali No.3, Hari Nagar, Narwana, on the
allegations that applicants/petitioners along with their other associates
cheated the complainant Ramesh Khatkar by inducing him to invest with
them by saying that he will earn income of 10% to 40% and he can
withdraw the money as and when required and they also got him assured
that his money will be safe. On their inducement, complainant has given
Rs.2.80 Crores to them on different dates. When the complainant

ASJ, Jind. (UID:HR0494)
14.7.2022

3
demanded back some money from them, they did not return the money on
one excuse or the other and thereafter, only small amount has been
credited in his account. Thereafter, they refused to return his money and
threaten to kill him and his family, if money is demanded back and
misappropriated his money.
4- Argument heard.
5- It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants-petitioners
that the applicants-petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present
case. It is further argued that the dispute between the parties is only of
civil nature and no criminal liability can be fastened upon them. It is
further argued that the applicants/petitioners are also ready to join the
investigation in the present case. It is further argued that nothing is to be
recovered from the applicants/petitioners and no custodial interrogation of
the applicants/petitioners is required. Learned counsel for the
applicants/petitioners has relied upon the citations Pardeep Kumar
Dhingra vs. State of Punjab and another CRM-5525 of 2020 in/&
CRM-M-47799 of 2019 decided on 1.2.2022 (P8rH) and
G.V.Bhaskar Rao and others vs. State of Punjab and another
Criminal Misc. MNo.22416 of 2012, decided on 10.1.2013 (P&H).
He, thus, prayed that anticipatory bail application of the applicants-
petitioners be allowed.

14.7.2022

4
6- Per contra, id. Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by
learned counsel for the complainant has strongly opposed the bail
application arguing that the allegations against the applicants-petitioners
are serious in nature. It is further argued that the custodial interrogation
of the applicants/petitioners is required. He, thus, prayed that
anticipatory bail application of the applicant-petitioner be dismissed.
7- I have given my thoughtful consideration to the argument
advanced by both the parties and carefully gone through the file.
8- As per prosecution case, applicants/petitioners along with
their other associates cheated the complainant Ramesh Khatkar by
inducing him to invest with them by saying that he will earn income of
10% to 40% and he can withdraw the money as and when required and
they also got him assured that his money will be safe. On their
inducement, complainant has given Rs.2.80 Crores to them on different
dates. When the complainant demanded back some money from them,
they did not return the money on one excuse or the other and thereafter,
only small amount has been credited in his account. Thereafter, accused
have refused to return his money and threaten to kill him and his family, if
money is demanded back and misappropriated his money. The
applicants/petitioners are named in the FIR. The allegations are serious in
nature. Custodial interrogation of the applicants/petitioners is required for

14.7.2022

5
sustained interrogation and recovery of the amount.
9. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused has relied upon
the judgments Pardeep Kumar Dhingra vs. State of Punjab and
another CRM-5525 of 2020 in/& CRM-M-47799 of 2019 decided
on 1.2.2022 (P&H) and G.V.Bhaskar Rao and others vs. State of
Punjab and another Criminal Misc. M.No.22416 of 2012, decided
on 10.1.2013 (P&H) (supra). With due respect there is no dispute as to
what has been held therein but the same are wholly distinguishable in
view of the peculiar facts and nature of evidence in the instant case. In
case titled as Sunil Kumar Vs. State, 181 (2011) DLT-528 (DB), it
was held that "no case can strictly be a precedent in a criminal matter for
the reason no two criminal trial would unfold the same story and the same
evidence. Thus, a decision cited burdening to the destination reached at a
particular criminal voyage has to be carefully applied on a principle of
law, in a subsequent voyage".
10 So, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case,
the applicants-petitioners are not entitled for bail. Hence, the present
anticipatory bail application filed by the applicants-petitioners is hereby
dismissed.
11 However, nothing mentioned herein above shall tantamount
to expressing of any opinion on the merits of the case and shall not affect

14.7.2022

6
any of the party during the trial.
Bail application file be consigned to record room, after due
compliance.
Pronounced in open Court.

Dated: 14.7.2022 (Subhash Chander Sroai),
Additional Sessions Judge,
Jind.UID:HR0494.
Note: This order consists of 6 pages and each page

has been duly checked and signed by me.
(Subhash Chander Sroai),

Additional Sessions Judge,
Jind.UID: H R0494.
Veena Rani, Stenographer Gr.!
Visit ecourts,qovan for updates or download mobile app "eCourts Services" from Android or iOS

14.7.2022
CNR No.HUN010035492022 B.A. CIS No.935-2022

7

14.7.2022

8

14.7.2022
Lt Iv% p
trfie‘A..
pou-iY
24"49T 977 --N(41-11 f m- r
ffr 17 4' Iro-,c71
(4)1q0,1,0 - z4s1- . , T T71.7 icr)i.t 90 652/20 rEcil 9 3 1.0977 iwrr
e°1
30TZ1'17Rti_e:LIT 115 1 17' 30.04.2021 fTRT 406.420,506 IPC al11T4T-67
3TRT4S71 1. 9T4T4117 -4T tf—A 1:TraT 90 101/07 f3r-e -az 34m. 3rcrr . OLF Phase-
<Zt51f17fi" (68) 77, TreTTI
1 ft7057—
2. ,t1i-if IIT(ff Tfloxf EMT 4Rft IcW"9" 90 101/07 RT-67z3.11"W 3Tt41 DLF Phase-1 RN') ,'LSZ
TN-it (68) ‘.0 ,1ic4i I
vi (41(4 Mtg . vt I.1ci 411 c111 3-TT#RP:19-
JOTPT
b1clIc 3TRizi 1T AM-TV#t '-41 -4T 91 1-tf 1832- P 19T- 17.04.2021 Li .41E4 41"
711"rjm 3"(4HP- 43. 3TtfT "If * .t4..r11e4i icr) 24T9T 16' -NOiir4mr rri f iq 1 71:1T
)(.41 4, 7zTo 771.0 Efic..) we= z4F ,cgccr, 7 T-i-<r 719-111M79* 90 652/20 rfl9 3
Th-T ak, fr g, 0•41- T 4 -1413794v11-u t, 4 q1,1 g uf-fu,11/4-i <40 2015 4 Tit-al:3r
ITRTit 37143ttrft Rgrt TTR-41- 7R9fit fk,) 3117 t$1 w--d1- 4 c4c1H41
t5M-11. W,str4 g \31,1,4-1 t"*.4-t ) I 69k1 qT731717T 47w v-0 1,rz. arr9T g3TT,TtarriT47-41" =le
f"-051:1' ZtT f4op-ir 34-z ci r if i4i crr-r
d-97 t, 17 11' 347 rit-drT ‹).t-t-t 4 34z loqic;
quick facilitator pvt.ltd. 4r4 *Ert -,4(11() 2). f2 tife 311R. Ril- tff zfizr 2 cr)6()
ftsfr 4 3757 1 i it 3117 NCR f 1 4 lit t 341-7 -0 (411 cgt
fi - 1" RTI-6).) "1:141. 4 117iT c1,11e412.412015 1)- kr161 4 crt-0" GIN 0157 HN-652/20 6R
it 0
374144 8 "FREI -1"(4-> "r"- fi ticit 4ciiIIST3N. 5/6 tt9'r 9,$) 4 ciwg zfrA" TM 12 FRI
" 1i
Th"-T return 3TTUT 4 2015 cb". L4Ifftnci i Rur.1.6 *4T Kari' 2-11-1 1tTT, ffrm-11., m1i F47-cf
-
4,6r f ccj i rf i i 3117 tit -ff -ft-Err r ti7t -d-4t Or7-41- Rtro-
TiTzt e)cry1 TR 2016 3M)" RT-44 fk-,1c.r)
c,l-PZ-11411 3N. 4)6T cgl 3174M1- 10% 0 . 40% cict 1t3-17:16),11 I*4.-) 3T-1 -z1rz*cA.,k1H4)k 341T
c4161 31-rcr tJ ttzt ,t(vt •-icr)k) zii fk -r-ff Trm--0- er*-1ITW179" c•IW ts1 faffru f a
- -rzrr
3T-1q- 3-r ttzTr TR-r-ff t 1' -q-4-4z 2016 460 7173" 9"(-1)1 "Thl" ( 6R•I'N Erz fz4r .T4 Trt- rf tit-a
772-T 0177 &FIT 241 *.t14) <41 11-4 50 aTz3r( 1-1,1,‹ 0 ER ) 2017 4 f474 f z.f •d9G Zf •di
1t-Err ,1441 zutfrz sto 97177 3N -ci•-‹1 1
- .4)J4 cTZ2)" 3474.-,1$) 0,141 4 f-4-5 -rzT
'1 2:11" 24T it7 f471-47 2017 4 70 FT73 it4Tf itTh-r13117 1/1-4rt 't-r'ou Th-\f" (-)-) •1 •7 Tinft Th-T
TT 4)6-11 •<6(11 P-T1- f2 ii i t".4v1 -1 .-Icpq' 4 gtf i ctr<i ditq 4.) 70 9R313T19-
0-19'1- T \A)4 ICICI
--1,141.11 A/C 358901500551 HDFC c-114.ti,set t 1 -Ncti-ti NC 50200032257848 0 HDFC ct
A/C 50200032260065 TTT"--6" NI iqNr tCICI44, A/C 358901500550
IMPS 9'7 74" 1)-7T 3117 30 "&T"G"S--# r e
- f " -T4-1
4r 31-MT4Z- 4 .sicrii Iijc , IT4I utzTT{Tar 9'2ft
f2-z1T 'H-11 ti 44 1.80 (4).).5 •-icr)‹ "f2 71: 9M-T 640 4TZ f4-437 t3# 3.L-1 •-f1-1q ,crriqT5::t-g 97'1'
Trq fkq-Rft --Ncii-11 -ti<I zr4 ft -u9- cum qrzft •-kcw-ii 'i i ui
. •
• ,
;
•
- ss • It
-EP-441-6.6 -Wan, -Pie 4 lsql. AtE E hfhli4 4

ki241Wit 4 -aPviE k*W 4a 4 1.'"Ni 41& 47-tal-Ektl PV•
J4i ozonI:6Z I .t,p h99 k.1, 101t,LR L.1/1g. .k..14 4 _KW 4 Dtkl.ip
.kra k4ct, (Ito rall. 4 4ft 1-)11-. 4 .m.) ht, I *.k 112E tkikg 1.30)10 V119 k4-11(\
4:14 k44,1-4e it' 0) 1-05 aik*R0->ci-h4
kft Ne hiLtkh 19P kkiA) k." A 12.4* A$11/11* -4k2 1-"tle t-m) 2440 4
It )1 i1 .14te 4 tau/ L I-. 441>_.m 9/S k4 1 ›.kait2.1112h.taile.*( Mi-t( 101Z)
1
19» thxo 4 ?al- irdie ptju
Ne 09 4 61,0Z Moibk 171-04 41$ 14 .Aife II..I b) IÜ3 hp/4% g itite
>1>1 .tlk *la I ihNihk) kwrA(. kt jito 4x 11211 4 1. 1211.e 4 IRP1-1 1-r1.41
1121±, _kt j op"\ kt 22.1p1 WII-Ncb 3-4•10
J U IIIt 1043 attatahatRia 44 190
ki44\ 41 12.?_ tzkr, .im.1..*Jarzt,*.1/41.41e JAI.* 4 Wilt Jp 4 112.ae
lt9 17614. El k3Wct, JsgIJ ihacb 19t-mit ,4:±a Ag4 pr?
k)win h .*1190, 114,1?•191Dt•n JA. redth kti-t9 11-.114. /*Ihig ,NX >41-rtp kg
k?.0113,*14uvi u4k> At* 4.t& N11441 Ncti ItirIZ
kk) Z114 .1g11_ 1-tPtit [ L±€4 (uIP. _412.a.k.kt PP fr . la1±0. NcPPU I.
Min9 06 41.* AiL g.(tt,.* kale LEc 4,11t 4 eib. NRc\9 Ntli‘e OL .P.it *at i Nfir, .a 4.5 4ix 4 *lit
4 Pa) *I Igtt, 111£ 1121P .60 L.1:03VP .tJh *at I 4 Lpt- uti9 .0* *.lb41.14 .6_%W 1J211
huol-ala* 0-T 01111£ Jj . .1h *at Ittlie
Ne 110zJ z 1-Z1 L 1at4 1---1311e *1'90 414R 1-&*4- 14'9t9 4g JME
4 JlF L/01. 4h1e 613v, .124 061.0Z ?la‘ LI. .e_41)
. 114 13W) .01h
ft ttritiA.u21± Kth gSp4444 4.1g ca$ Itakl ?,(4,t.1{131-t !915.p,kal la eit, )i6.1142.4
.elx 4 19t6.tih t q ii r J14)p 1/114 =ate Alt b-Zir`Ohlie .14.09*.241;1 94 4
t•bni 11-14th 10-. I JtP'. 4k-V 4
>io 6VV-S MALMIte 4 .1141 itzt >119 4&1 14R -9c.b 4 k. ,(17 1311% 1-aS 0, 4 .41ilt.
4g/ ?o, R.)1 # E 101019 (.(a) 0,ka jj I U JR.(*Plb 4.624 e ,,t)Ag3.4 2ko.4.aRtit
tn., 4 (4,au 4 a414,1, kpe ktR pcb k.atb # k.k.4N kg EsE ghik 4 ii_04
1-1X *Th--16 iiq 100' FU*2J '310 kh 424P-14 1e ) 1k# 11421-L

" 1P---4
2.eme . j:t 204 Slt 1-1, 4.1R k4X B2lle #*.p. D141,14 .k1 zP4#
kut3p.4..6PIcMJhLI o.,14p 4 n2t.re (eouellaueN)141,0.ha JJ c.b 2?-1-± 14 .0
11.`ktt Lbt? .1 .11V J14,0 tql1 .4 ?..tit k5IPVit 4lie

88L °Nan Nt 1214 #
*ot? ojaH
k?44 c1-046
Wt.jcLthUv2z.thit bokn o_h.t* )9a, k-I-NP .kg3Lik9lb-b# (000`0L) sei.Ja,
4 \1 V•a, kb
0 61.0Z 10)14\ s 1. 4 kw,), * JaPM P2fit Od0Hk.14 02331189L
"`' -oa4P‘›4-,.w
*jmot,
I LJ11 45 11-13 14thlie k •4 liait&R ka4LP-4 111
kVa0 114'0 ktta 111 kallol 0hile W 12-k
.64 .144-1-1e ik-1P-4.14-t& 1,R
ttt.. J,P, it??J
PIE 14 jjEde *pa 41, 1t-a1P_Mit kM-&g_42440.01.R OZ/01,
'BT44r-JI Tffr4 aN rtf-7a
- R t;)- ITTF 7ffr :.,Tr-4 F11
. f1-7I1 vOr ILK
7-r7:131" 713). ,
FrFri4T vii•?120167)• 2018 iTT 3T1T-1KTIFT (4017 'ETT-c-T)' 0• 1""UTt 3174 tERT
3.1‘t 445 UZ* TF 2.80 ilAs -47 '17T)• T't f71 RJR ;ct, (10 4 t1-4 ff.,7 1. loci ;1717 7F.,11-11. 71Fr1
Zr-dTh-g -(vit 731-d-1 /TT T - Tbr dc.c.t).-S A/C -
358901500551, 2. ICICI ;(1-) nc -c-
164905000244, 3. ICICI 4u) R-F.--
A To] !TRW - V47T cc j A/C - 164001500679, 4. HDFC 4-T
97-471-BITTT IT T_ R41. odco5 A/C -5010024323439, 5. HDFC UrdT ZTT - 'R"4.71. Ic t
A/C - 50200032257848, 6. HDFC 44) -Noir UTUTUTZT -*PT .qdct).5 A/C - 50200032260065, 7.
ICICI 445 TJTUTZTTZT - tRt9. - 358901500550, 8. 4co 3175. 1 F --kcir•tr tlior "c4Hct)
- tT4417 A/C - 42260100001569, ft4T-41- tri7t f4IT-4T 711-dff rirRt 9810730005 tc.111 1 7. 0 101/7
34-aRTH57 v -)c)4, DLF "- Jrur.. Do / ftTrf TrfTT 4:t-19'90
70 71'1diTtITT-
S-449 ,GK-1 9t0 34664027287 whatsapp/ R'ffta. 94)i f 9-0 235 9Ji .11-1 ,-11,Sci \3 f
7TFT.N NuAd T-V:14 7314 't0 8800343774/ ci 114/,1 t 11)0 442033185161
whatsapp/ ffr i 7 -7TIT/f - rrlo 9810557788/ reF/Attf ct). --tic-i 9).0 7206363953/
tic') OD 8699804004/ cr). 7WRITi 4T 160 7:0 t;')7311" TTZ" TrRr
2.80 ck fP 3T4 *I sd- Ramesh 13/4/21 #IT tqdcb.s
c<1 TIT 9cbi-1 - 652/20 T. 3 e .9TTV, itFT \IN It 4177.
- 9416118433 3T:Tft crftqrq T
I1Vg9" 4 If UM 406,420,506 IPC TT .-1,<‘,1 0-1r crTzTT \Ai-)q 3.11-''1 3i-RPbT
3ffkEitrr Th-r 3TTF-v
- <pief uzr fk^i y4-d- ftr6- kI &9-o- 4 dizu i ii urr fro 74F 13Tg
(41,6 6 *1 \JLNI-cl 34ftR- IT TT 3T7FITT9' cP14 T 140- 3TITF FTETT iT i* I
3T7i7zT1.9. f IctI4d qc1 1Odc.t) . gkI 3ft17:1)7T 99f cii i1 itfftW 20.08.2021 0 14U it7
Wf kF rTi 3T 3T ¶1 T1]17tT 04.09.2021
3rfTztrr twzm cool 5kr 1-4 Tr RTfro)- $1. 3r-d-rr ara-Tr ‹.Gk-ct
6cpc4 ct,• ) 4cr) Tft cb-1 ITTf I I 3TitT17 PT 417 :1-1 ilqII 1 -9:rT 23.10.2021
3Tftp:1)-rr 4 -114-Ivf m-sr 3fterlr Uffirff t1t -4{- f t Tr7 0-1 11bI31-R9-th-Trui- Trf4F
-41r 6,11 3TM-Rz4 -9- # t - rzru--fff.R-- Our trt f2 7 2.80 ,N1.5 -70r41- 6N19‹
d-q-r ct) .) ITFt7 31-RftT9 37* gI I 3Titrf
fW1 \AA 1I 3TI Tch-R9T7). iiIc I t *Icl-TTV #*-
1. 3 r m itI
2. q5 'MO *f . 3T.TerziTRT4T-41- 7T-df 33-itt .01-1171-4f ft .TTEITT-dt -TraT 2.80 ct) .5 cn
ql-ur u -gt cik<ict 4*) 4 3TR-ft -M. Ri-T24- urfIT er I
3. I Ic1 2T tMIRtit qa 11--dif0 7141)- TT1YT 31fiTeFT
5lcflcl We-i rTT4. TO* I
4. Zig ,leid 3TR1 T ftaTt EfT4-f '11-11 1:1Fiff %T-REdTh-d
-t RITP-T 2.80 cr).).1*t
Or-Err tcn jci cr.N.) 43374 3TR*RTF Trt-21- urf4 - 9-r
5. 'Z-1 friZr 4 col4 RITT f42TF tR R)1RiT9' 31:1tTql fl'f4F.
3ITT'ETF J ici ITP7 3TVZTF T*U 2.1T 9T tf,01 1,4.,T f -71T
iql *I
G. 1
.1q)c-P9T T 'UM 301-44 ,tui UNT RPTzTff tT \34m-ci c Rf:TT-d-R•t zTTTTPT
r4 eiqA ir 311-4ftr19" 'f-TRT•F utiti TE.ff g3Tr t
7. TIT-17112-1 117-1T-ffzT•g"T 3T1 1f4-4T 0Mr4 ITRIT qNT RT-M •4-4 6 4 4 ti- Frit:iT 3TRATT
-6MM-a zTIRW ;Tr - 4 ur-44
fT4 w 4 - t
dm-dt 7•TZT f
8. 3T-Treiqi 3TtR1IT TRJT 3i1trm1tTivr I IRwzr- tTr4 Wm-7m' r-F viitT Tizzifkm
c#4 1-11 cict) 0-1-4 PRTF MU Tgf g3TT t I
9. ff,IT4)1LIc1coc4 3TTO% zzazi• i ftEFTT 419T DLF Phase-1 plJT4 3.if 5ff Th7qTz).
3ftztiT n - (4->) <1-11 , 1*p-or f4ra. ER ITT4 prr 4-ztrfk 34-rtlfrff qr1?0-
TIt 3717TT1 •-igl3Tt
10. f c1cbc1 I I3IT-4 - 311iTeff 3rTtftricif ceo-11 4 oil Zre•
f- z) rz fir trz tTrzr-dm---dt gi,<17-qffT 2.rr9-r -Ncivir 4 cmciteir ,1441 t
1. gpo Wr 414 fThm-rzr-ff q \3t,r4 3aWrtritr1 kI vli-c4 \JLNI-ci 31-ftt -r ‹ ,A
%zu iii i-rr urff u14a. •-ig1 prr uarr 1r gt 4,14 ‹•(-c1i ,.1
374zR.T4 TrsT ft-trt
12. 37-efT11013rMffccl Iflim-rzraTt cz1191.0TN15T Ie1tf c4.-Pt 2.80 cN Ti#1 thUT
cR
13. 3TTRit1vi 3-cri1ffi 9T 6uiT 4 31•141- fflf?1 " viiti i ti
14. 317tr1tTluT .T:Ttr T'T 7q1:1T 1T1=4F. 3T-TizUff ct).< 70110- 41 TT4g• I
15. I CI CI t W-"f\rf 3T.M1:4 1 TUT ftco cr4)4 RT1P-T T 4ztroT Ott t fkk 2.80 cQ6
f ii t
16. c17 fk4Z tl
17. 3T111' 3Tft14iT r 3T-TOtTT9* wrzt 7T-ti t 7)- 31TI T 3.7-41RrT9- ft- 1-4-
4 ftwrt- 7R-{ -
18. 31-rtrf*rur ztr0-- ffr--ra--d--t --df- R-fraT zl. ti)--6rr z.V- 4 2.80 cQ,.5' l 61 I91
v-11.1 t
19. 34-rti1 luT 31:TRY 4 9'wzr-J ----dT . TI-T21 $1- §i ztruT -g' r 4 .1= tf 2.80 q),
, -114 t
20. 374 3T-ft4T1 Th-T 31-Vt1T9' 4-44 vii<51 t 7)'3TI T 3T-TerzTT9- 1 - T4 6i 2-11-71
7.1tWit .grft{ f -zrr
3r-d: vic41.1 erZT c14 911-41 "zi 31 T-T 311* TGA 3TTR14E4Tff
\4 t t1 v1411-10 7:11-12-Th-T 914-171: 1krii.) •TE1qR•31T-b1 4h-79-14 I
'AT-4--mi 34777
2-11-9T
1 "9t- • 13.07.2022
AT CHANDIGARH
106 CRM-M-32174-2022
Shibani Parti and another vs the State of Haryana and another
Present: Ms. Mahima Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
*****
1. Notice of motion.
2. Mr. P.P. Chahar, DAG, Haryana, waives service on behalf of
the respondent-State, and, is permitted to within three weeks, file reply, and,
status report.
3. List on 07.09.2022.
4. In the meantime, and, till further orders, the bail applicants-
petitioners may not be arrested, by the arresting officer. However, subject
to the bail applicants-petitioners furnishing personal and surety bonds in the
sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. The
bail applicants shall also give an undertaking before the arresting officer,
that as and when they are summoned through a written Hukamnama, they
shall ensure theirs rendering cooperation to the investigating officer,
especially qua theirs making an undertaking, qua their willingness, to
deposit a reasonable sum of the purported embezzled sums, before the
learned trial court concerned.
July 26, 2022 (SURESHWAR THAKUR)

sarita JUDGE
1of 1
::: Downloaded on - 27-07-2022 22:15:24 :::
AT CHANDIGARH
207 CRM-M-32174-2022
SHIBANI PART! AND ANOTHER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND

ANOTHER
Present: Mr. Jatin Sharma, Advocate for

Ms. Mahima, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Ashok K. Sharma, Advocate

for respondent No.2.
****
While issuing notice of motion, this Court had granted the
interim protection to the petitioners.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Raj Kumar,
states that the petitioners have not joined the investigation.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that due to some
communication gap, the petitioners could not join the investigation and one
more opportunity may be granted to the petitioners to join the investigation.
The petitioners are directed to join investigation and appear
before the Investigating Officer on 14.09.2022 at 11:00 A.M. and shall
also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Interim protection granted to the petitioners vide order
dated 26.07.2022, shall remain continue till the next date of hearing.
Adjourned to 07.12.2022.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
07.09.2022 JUDGE
Neha
1of 1
::: Downloaded on - 18-09-2022 19:33:39 :::
iN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. OF 2022
MEMO OF PARTIES
1. SHIBANI PARTI aged 49 years Wife of Late Gautam Para; resident
of House no.- 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments, DLF PHASE-1,
SikanderpurGhosi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana - 122002.
2. SANA PARTI aged 29 years Daughter of Late Gautam Parti; resident

of House no.- 101/7, Silver Oak Apartments, DLF PHASE-1,
SikanderpurGhosi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana - 122002.
...Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Haryana;
2. Ramesh Khatkad son of Sh. Chanda Ram resident of H.No.
652/20, Gali No. 3, Hari Nagar, Narwana, District Jind, Haryana.
...Respondents
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
1
FIRST PETITION under 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure for the grant of Anticipatory Bail to the
petitioners in case bearing FIR No.115, dated 30.04.2021
under section 406,420,506 IPC, 1860 (ANNEXURE P-1)
registered at Police Station Narwana City, Haryana, in the
interest of justice.
Further, it is also prayed that ad-interim
anticipatory bail thereby staying the arrest of the
petitioner during the pendency of the present petition
may also be granted.
Any other relief order or direction which this
Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in view of the
facts and circumstances of the present case also be
granted, in the interest of justice.

2
"The genesis of this jurisdiction lies in Article 21 of the Constitution,

as an effective medium to protect the life and liberty of an individual.
The provision therefore needs to be read liberally, and considering its
beneficial nature, the courts must not read in limitations or
restrictions that the legislature had not explicitly provided for. Any
ambiguity in the language must beresolved in favour of the applicant
seeking ,lief," - Hon'ble Chief Justice of India N.V.Ramanna, Nathu
Singh vz, The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 28 May, 2021
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
Preliminary Submissions
1 That the present petitionersare law abiding citizens of the
country and respected citizens of the society. While the
petitioner no. 1 is widow single mother to her college going son
85 daughter trying to make the ends meet after the unfortunate
demise of her husband, the petitioner no. 2 (Daughter of
petitioner no. 1) is a recently married homemaker trying to
take her initial steps the family way.
2. That, they have been falsely implicated in the abovementioned
FIR at the behest of the complainant (herein referred as
respondent no. 2), who has leveled false and frivolous
allegations against the petitioners and there is no iota of
substance and/or evidence with the prosecution or the

3
complainant to link the petitioners with the commission of
crime, the Petitioners are totally unrelated to the respondent
no. 2 and had only first met him in July 2019, when he urged
petitioner no. 1 to meet her husband who was on his death
bed at that time.
3. That, The instant FIR has come to be filed after the failure of
several earlier attempts of the respondent to falsely frame the
petitionersincluding a complaint before EOW- due to absence
of material and substance, and sheer abuse of process of law
and hence, the instant petition is being filed for grant of
anticipatory bail before this Hon'ble Court with the following
submissions at hand.
4. That, there is a long prelude to the instant FIR reproduced
hereunder, wherein the respondent no. 2, an acquaintance of
the deceased husband of petitioner no. 1, has continually
humiliated the petitioners herein by trespassing into their
home by force along with 15-20 people, sending intimidating
messages, filing false complaints etc. threatening the two
women (petitioners) on various fronts.

4
5. That, as if the grief laden fateful circumstances of the
petitioners were not enough to derail their lives, they have
kept up with the deliberate harassment caused to the by
respondent no. 2 and come out clean each time thinking that
was it, especially when the Economi Offences Winggave a
foreclosure to the complaint falsely filed by the
respondent no. 2 rendering the petitioners innocent.
6. That, this time the respondent no. 2 has manipulated the local
police in his area by fabricating the facts afresh to form the
jurisdiction there and there has been no reasonable
conclusion to the same for 15 months.
7. That, for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court, the true
translated version of the FIR is reproduced hereinasunder:-
"I Ramesh Khatkad, am a resident of H.No. 652/20,
Gali No. 3, Hari Nagar, Narwana, District Jind,
Haryana. I am a frequent visitor overseas and I also
work as a Yoga Instructor in Russia. I had first met late
Gautam Parti along with his wife ShibaniParti, in
January-February 2015 at Delhi Airport where they told

me about their business in Delhi and overses.
Thereafter, we visited each other's homes many a time
and later Gautam introduced me to Vikram Kashyap
and said they were business partners. Vikram and
Gautam were friends and ran a company named Quick
Facilitators Pvt. Ltd in Gurgaon, Wherein the directors
were Rohit Puri and Ranjit Kashyap who proclaimed
that they had great business overseas and in Delhi.
They showed me a list of many people who had
invested in their company. In 2015 when they first
visited my home in Narwana, I hasd paid 8 Lakh Cash
to them. I received a net profit of about 4 lakh in 5-6
months i.e. I received a return of about 12 Lakh in the
Summer of 2015, which was all dealt with in cash.
Gautam, Shivani, Sana and Vikram said Devraj looks
after the overseas business and Rohit Puri runs the
India business. Gautam and Shivani along with Rohit
Puri visited me at my home in Narwana during the
winter of 2016. All of them provoked me to invest into
their business and committed an income of 10-40%.

6
They also said the company is registered with the
government and that you can invest or withdraw your
money at your own ease so, I further gave 60 Lacs to
them when Gau tam and Vikram visited my home in
Narwana, thereafter I paid a sum of 50 Lakh in June
201 7 also at my residence in the presence of Randhir
S/ o Natthu Ram and Chanda ram S/ o Kishanlal who
had taken me in their confidence. Then, in December
2017, I paid 70 Lakh which was received by Rohit who
was sent by Vikram and Shivani. All of these always
advised me to carry out the whole business in cash.
Thereafter, I sent 70 Lakh Online through my ICICI
account no. 358901500551, HDFC Bank Model town
Narwana Bank account no. 50200032260065, my
wife's Bank account ICICI Account no. 358901500550
through IMPS. I also sent 30 Lac to some other company
account in Dubai (Record attached) I effected cash
transaction of about 1.80 Crore in the presence of
Randhir Singh and Chanda Ram. Thereafter if I asked
for a refund they said if you withdraw now you might

7
lose your money. I called Vikram and Shivani every now
and then who then used to inform me that they have
deputed one Devender@ Raj on task for me, who will
provide me the amount that I ask for. Raj transferred
about 788 Euros to my account to which I objected but
he said, let's first withdraw a small amount so that
your company gets attached to the company and then
the further transactions can be smooth. When I went to
meet my bank manager I told him that 788 euros have
just landed in my bank account and that a lot of my
money is about to come. The bank manager then
prompted that this money has been sent through
unlawful means and that I can't withdraw it and that I
should never in future accept money through such
means. Ifurther spoke with bank authorities in Delhi as
well who reiterated the same. When I tried to talk to
Shivani and Vikram regarding this, they said the delay
in my money is due to some problem on government
side. Raj further said I'll let you know after discussion.
Few months passed in this vicious cycle. Thereafter I

8
reached at Vikram's office on the given address, i.e.the
registered address S-449 Greater Kailash, New
Delhi but I found no one. Shivani assured me that Rohit
will soon call me with reagrds to my money and you'll
receive all your money. After a few days my friend and
I went to the said office in Greater Kailash where I met
their servant and then Rohit Puri called in some time
and asked me to come to Emporio Mall, Vasant Kunj on
17th July 2019. Gautam and Rohit Puri had come there
along with 10-12 men and we had a lot of argument
whereafter they said to me that I'll get my money within
7 days surely. I didn't get anything even thereafter so I
along with my friend went to Gautam Parti's residence
to recover my money but Shivani didn't even speak with
us properly. Thereafter Gautam called and said you will
get your money from tomorrow onwards. Thereafter
once 70000, thereafter 50000INR at once 90000 at
other time, amounting to a total of 14 Lakh received in
my abovementioned account. Hereinafter, Gautam
started staying very ill and His wife Shivani started to

9
avoid me. Thereafter I went to Gautam's home where
Shivani and Sana said if you come here again we'll
have you eliminated. As soon as I left from there I
received a phone call from Vipin/ Pradeep of Karnal who
claimed to be a friend of Gautam's and Vikram
Kashyap's and said he can facilitate our compromise.
One day Vipin invited me to a hotel in karnal and said
that your money has all been lost and now he will,
arrange for some money for me. Then, KK called that
Vipin and Bunty are coming to Narwana to return my
money. After some time in November 2019 Bunty and
Vipin called me to say that I must meet them on
Narwana Canal to return my money. When I went there
with my friend Krishan Kumar, we discovered they
were 5-6 men who attempted to coerce us into signing
papers they had got. Upon hearing the ruckus many
people came from nearby and so the men with Vipin ran
away leaving the papers there itself that I had collected
. thereafter they said, now you'll not get anything from
us and you don't know what we can do, we have

10
topnotch approach in the system. These people always
had the intention of fraudulently earning money from
me and it is with this intention that these people took
my trust for a ride and committed fraud on me. On
29.10.2020, i had filed a complaint regarding this fraud
in the Economic cell Wing but the police along the
accused hide the matter and did not take proper action.
So, i humbly request you to take immediate action
against these people by registering a case. And, my
family's life and property should be protected and the
said amount should be recovered from the culprits. And
my justice should be given to me by borrowing from my
acquaintances and from my own and bank accounts
from 2016 to 2018. Gave people's accounts from which
money was given 1. ICICI BANK Nawrana Bank Holder-
Ramesh Khatkar A/c 358901500551 2. ICICI BANK
Delhi account holder - Ramesh khatker A/c:
164905000244, 3. ICICD3ank Delhi Account Holder -
Ramesh Khatkar A/c-164901500679. 4. HDFC Bank
Narwana Account- Ramesh Khatkar A/c

11
501002433439, 5. HDFC Bank Narwana Account
Holder Ramesh Khatkar A/c 502000300578486. 6.
HDFC Bank Narwana Account Holder Ramesh khatkar
A/c 50200032260065, 7. ICICI Bank Narwana Account
Holder Parveen Rani A/c 358901500550, 8 Bank of
Baroda Nawrana Account Holder dharamveer A/c
42260100001569, Shivani Path widow Gautam path
Address...Do/ Vikram Kashyap house no. s-449, GK-1
new delhi Mo. 34664027287 whatsapp / Rohit puni
House no. 235 new green model town Jaidhar/ Ranjit
Kashyap Gurugram Mo. 8800343774/ devraj/
devendervishwakarmadelhi mo. 442033185161
whatsapp / k. o KshitijKhattargurugram/ Delhi mo.
9810557788/ vipin/ Pradeep Karnal Mo. 7206363953/
Bunty Karnal Mo. 8699804004. All these people are
working together in a conspiracy. Under this, by
cheating and fraud, grabbed 2.80 crores and now
threatens to kill me. sdramesh 13/4/21 petitioner
rameshkhatkar son chanda ram house-652/20 street
no. 3 Harinagar, narwana District Jind Mo.

12
9416118433. Aj, Police station, on receipt of the above
complaint number 1832P dated 17.04.2021 in Bajaria
postal station. on being found to be involved in the crime
with section 406, 420, 506 IPC from the forceful
request. 115 dated 30.04.2021 section 406, 420, 506
hoC Police station Narwana Registered Reg. After doing
this, a computerized copy of FIR will be prepared and
send to the service of Bajaria postal officer bala. The
original request for copying Michal Police has been kept
for further investigation. Whose in-depth investigation
will be implemented."
1 That,Bare perusal of the FIRalongwith previous versions of his,
devoid of any substantial claims or facts, makes clear the
intent of the apparently greedy respondent no. 2i.e.to
wrongfully gain money from wherever he can. The rampant
mention of random names in connection to the arbitrary flow
of money indicates towards the suspicious nature of
profession of the respondent no. 2
2. That, a false and fabricated complaint, dated 28.12.2019, vide
DD no. 1688-P, (ANNEXURE P-2) was first filed against both

13
the petitioners to cause criminal intimidation, annoyance and
insult to the petitioners. It was further forwarded to ACP
(EAST) Gurugram on 30.12.2019. The petitioners joined the
investigation and co-operated in the enquirywhereafter the
matter was closed.
3. That, yet another complaint dated, 13.07.2020, vide DD No.
245-5D(ANNEXUFtE P-3), was filed with the SHO PS Narwana
City, District Jind, Haryana in furtherance of his ulterior
motives but in vain. It is notable that the three versions of
the respondent No. 2 differ altogether from each there and
such surmises as Conjectures create a reasonable doubt on
the authority of police officials who seem to have
deliberately ignored the lapses in the information during their
preliminary investigation before registering the instant FIR.
4. That, owing to this intermittent effort made by respondent no.
2 with the Economic Offences Wing, a thorough investigation
was conducted by the police inspector named Satish
Kumar (+91 7015019080) along with three other officers(
dressed in uniform) visited the petitioner's residence on
18-01-2021. They interrogated the petitioners for more

14
than 4-6 hours. Upon thorough investigation and perusal
of necessary documents, the said complaint was found to
be frivolously baseless and hence was duly closed thereby
rendering the petitioners innocent.
5. That, as a result of the continued harassment by the
respondent the petitioners were compelled to move to the
police themselves and register an FIR dated 25.01.2021 in the
DLF PHASE-I Police station, Gurugrarn, Haryana(ANNEXURE
P-4)
6. That, as a result of the abovementioned FIR by the petitioners
and upon his second failure to falsely frame the petitioners
and extort money out of them, the respondent manipulated
the local police officials of his area into registering the instant
FIR purely with the intent to humiliate and extort money out
of the petitioners.
7. That, in spite of the foreclosure report of the Economic
Offences Wing, Jind and thorough cooperation of the
petitioners with the local police of Jind, the investigation still
remains pending for about 15 months which smells of frivolity
and connivance.
15
8. That, the police authorities alongwith the respondent no. 2
have repeatedly harassed and humiliated the petitioners by
passing unbecoming personal remarks on the petitioners
instead of undertaking the procedure for which the petitioners
have been ever available like (paise to aapneliye hi honge, ye
jhooththode hi
bolrahehain/aappaisewaapaskyonnahinkardeteinko etc.)
9. That, the apex court has further uplifted the settled principle
of law to be observed while exercising the discretionary power
U/s 439 CrPC in Nathu Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
on 28 May, 2021 while pronouncing as below:
20. At first blush, while this submission appears to be attractive, we are

of the opinion that such an analysis of the provision is incomplete. It is
no longer res integra that any interpretation of the provisions of Section
438, Cr.P.C. has to take into consideration the fact that the grant or
rejection of an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. has a direct
bearing on the fundamental right to life and liberty of an individual. The
genesis of this jurisdiction lies in Article 21 of the Constitution, as an
effective medium to protect the life and liberty of an individual. The
provision therefore needs to be read liberally, and considering its
beneficial nature, the Courts must not read in limitations or restrictions
that the legislature have not explicitly provided for. Any ambiguity in
the language must be resolved in favour of the applicant seeking relief.
In this context, this Court, in the Constitution Bench decision of this
Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565,
which was recently upheld and followed by this Court in Sushila
Aggarwal (supra), held as follows:
"26. We find a great deal of substance in MrTarkunde's submission that since

denial of bail amounts to deprivation of personal liberty, the court should lean
16
against the imposition of unnecessary restrictions on the scope of Section 438,

especially when no such restrictions have been imposed by the legislature in the
terms of that section. Section 438is a procedural provision which is concerned
with the personal liberty of the individual, who is entitled to the benefit of the
presumption of innocence since he is not, on the date of his application for
anticipatory bail, convicted of the offence in respect of which he seeks bail. An
overgenerous infusion of constraints and conditions which are not to be found
in Section 438 can make its provisions constitutionally vulnerable since the right
to personal freedom cannot be made to depend on compliance with unreasonable
restrictions. The beneficent provision contained in Section 438 must be saved, not
jettisoned..." (emphasis supplied)
24. We cannot be oblivious to the circumstances that Courts

are faced with day in and day out, while dealing with anticipatory bail
applications. Even when the Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory
bail to an accused, there may be circumstances where the High Court is
of the opinion that it is necessary to protect the person apprehending
arrest for some time, due to exceptional circumstances, until they
surrender before the Trial Court. For example, the applicant may plead
protection for some time as he/she is the primary caregiver or
breadwinner of his/her family members, and needs to make
arrangements for them. In such extraordinary circumstances, when a
strict case for grant of anticipatory bail is not made out, and rather the
investigating authority has made out a case for custodial investigation,
it cannot be stated that the High Court has no power to ensure justice. It
needs no mentioning, but this Court may also exercise its powers
under Article 142 of the Constitution to pass such an order
10. That, while petitioner no. 1 is a single mother to her college
going son and petitioner no. 2, who is married a couple of
years ago and is in the process of beginning a family life by
attempting to take her initial steps into motherhood.

17
11. That, the petitioners have been cooperative with the
authorities so far of which the Economic Offences Wing
foreclosure report is a proof, yet in spite of the frivolity of
subsequent complaints that have tended to disrupt the family
life after having lost their beloved husband and father
respectively, the petitioners have ever been responsive and
cooperative.
12. That, the petitioners are permanent respected residents of the
abovementioned address, where they have been interrogated
by the police authorities in the preceding false complaints that
later found closure and still are often visited by the police
personnels owing to the instant FIR, hence neither has there
ever been nor will there be any chance to flee.
13. That,this is the first Anticipatory bail application U/s 438 by
the present petitioners before this Honble Court and no other
application for grant of Anticipatory bail is pending in any
court of law at the time of filing the instant petition before this
Hon'ble Court.
14. That, owing to the above facts and circumstances, the
Petitioner a bonafide citizen of this country, deserves the

18
concession and protection of Anticipatory bail also being
rightful of the constitutional provisions guaranteed Under
Article 21.
15. That the petitioners undertake to abide by all terms and
conditions, if so, imposed by this Hon'ble Court while granting
the benefit of Anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
16. That there is no apprehension of absconding of the petitioners
or tampering with the prosecution evidence.
17. That there is no other FIR pending against the present
petitioners except the present one in which the petitionersis
praying for bail.
It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition
may kindly be accepted and the petitioners be granted Anticipatory
Bail in case bearing FIR No.115 dated 30.04.2021 registered under
Sections 406, 420, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, at JindPolice
Station,Narwana City, Haryana,in the interest of justice.
Further, it is also prayed that ad-interim anticipatory bail
thereby staying the arrest of the petitioners during the pendency of
the present petition may also be granted.

19
Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble
Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of
the present case be also passed.
It is further prayed that petitioners may kindly be exempted
from filing the certified and true typed copies of all the annexures,
FIR, in the interest of justice.
NOTE:
1. No such petition is pending before the learned Sessions Court
or any other competent court at the time of filing the present
petition.
2. Affidavit is attached.
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
20
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB
AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M- of 2022
ShibaniPartiasanr. ...Petitioners
Versus
Affidavit of SHIBANI PARTI aged 49 years Wife of
Late Gautarn Parti; resident of House no.- 101/7,
Silver Oak Apartments, DLF PHASE-1,
SikanderpurGhosi (68), Gurgaon, Haryana -
122002.
I, the above named deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and
declare as under:
1. That the deponent is filing the present petition before this
Hon'ble Court and the same is likely to succeed on the
grounds taken therein.

21
2. That present petition has been prepared and drafted on the
record facilitated by the deponent.
3. That the contents of this petition have been read over to the
deponent and the same have been understood by the
deponent.
4. That the deponent has not filed any similar petition on the
same cause of action either before this Hon'ble Court or in the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and no such or similar
petition is pending in any court of law.
5. That Aadhaar Card of the petitioner has been annexed
alongwith the petition.
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022 DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:-
Verified that the contents of Parallo.1 to 5 of the affidavit
are true and correct to the knowledge of the deponent, no part of it
is false nothing material has been kept concealed therein.
CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022 DEPONENT
22

CRM M- of 2022
ShibaniParti&anr. ...Petitioners
Versus
INDEX
Sr. Particulars Dated Page Court

No. Fee
1 Petition U/s 438 Cr.P.C. 27.06.2022 1-19
2 Affidavit in support 27.06.2022 20-21
3 Annexure P-1 FIR no. 115 30-04-2021
4 Annexure P-2 Complaint DD 28-12-2019
no. 1688-P
5 Annexure P-3 DD No. 245-5D 13-07-2020
6 Power of Attorney 27.06.2022
7 Aadhaar Card of petitioners ---
VERNACULARS
8 FIR No.115 30.04.2021 71-74
9 Complaint DD no. 1688-P 28-12-2019
1 DD No. 245-5D 13-07-2020
TOTAL COURT FEE AFFIXED
Note: 1. Any Similar Case: NIL

2. Advance copy has been supplied in the office of Advocate
General, Haryana.
3. Whether any sitting/former MP/MLAs is involved in the
case or not: No
23
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
24
CRM M- of 2022
ShibaniParti&anr. ...Petitioners
Versus
Total Court Fee/ -
PLACE: CHANDIGARH
DATED: 27.06.2022

D-260/2016 P-3189/2010
(TRISHU SINGH)
P-1171/12
ADVOCATES
.5 .-
),g7 k 70 Qii0 • •-ti73[1-9-i-n--?-1f4W4W4MTR
W-51' 15 .teli 49- "trzA't \14'11--c1 3113" ICICI A-e7pT HDFC ct)
.Z.5fc'ct) 14c4). t . U18- t .14t r iq MI T 'NI 30 'MU 7'71C 3ntrjA" T41- ct)4-4.11 - . A-i-dTs•-q--4 A ,0-f .(5c4),s.
ki 311-4 c,1141 7g9T-)" TR 4 ?
‘.3c1cr .16 •
IP( 16 (NI 341rf t TP:1-4 15 r91 2019 zb-1" 788 EUR Tat 70 T•.7N .otch.s.t ZNIM ci-tit-nq'f457117 4 ?
TT 17 Li6 mil- ø QT ef car '9"t Wei •Ci HDFC Act, tgrdT tz3r7 ,54cicii4-11 Q41' ft 3117 zr6 •TcA
Rolicicri Ter izi tzr-6- IftTrzq- -a- t 3ff-4 t
\.3 - cP)4 vit.-10141 -fel t I 461AA-0- e}(,)k^
P%5118 T bs N1 3TItTM4f 2 4-).)..5. 80 FT6 "•77 altiR c1, 11.) GI( eviNt 31-rq- f41 1)- =
4)6'11 'MO ?
\1-Clq - 9 -er ci))4 9tr tI w .-4tt -
pW 19 Ow .9tr.o,.5- M•031TETO. f47 1.17 2 cr),4). . 80 T'qT
- v-ik; 3114- T 5 -IN ce.i4V 4 cl'IN
Rir -tfra' <-(10‘Ji T 14) •41941ar4Ift f 317izr4 z4u gc.(tis4RT- fc Trq cw4Lik 4 -41 evtiq 31tz 34T 41-1 K1
?
tig) e -I•)'0)4 ct4 4# 141 R't ia— Ch 'a rfiG-11 rr I
pv-420 3Trtr ctq \-012),A 3174 r tRT cfrmi titc th. f0:17?„)
--ttktAcii 414T4t##RFtfrff 011luilcr3TITI Wm-4qt ,tivaorm
ITN- 21 3.4J 1 I1I 4) -) 4fit Wgrrt ?
TATEsTeciaT
7-91- 22 cNI 3T1IT MeN, , VuTtU , - cH[ \If f:4'Wft , f45).9.574q 4'4\
- T&t 7Ft" 45v\Ala-

PW 23 qz.11 311r*tfre **WIT 3114 WI-f1 T 117 t ?
6 it c4 41N f4. W VI'
TP31 24 3171:1 -119 f "ffqt.91tTI- ‘11,16 T:R411ff 4 t9TTft #gylt ?
7T-g'' 014 T4-4t*RiZ' 9"7“17 ct rt eA.AA-x-
\1cW 11-4)" -119 ITV Oi irc t .I 4#7, 91t 0r 111t
3 3F:. 77 31 -"d 7TA- 3TaKff grtcl1-11" T-Eett" ztT
1W25 3 9frt41 r4"91- 26.07.2022
\ictt- $9 3Ttr . 4f "-ff ct>4 tiRITT c-,)4 cb-1 vPir ZIT Ter
Li3r 26 3114-4' lt4Id
37017 Th 5 ff ZT ? av•-•
\R-H. #et , fk-Ztr t' I Vf 9t 14c1i 'dec05, 0 0 ciftqR ITZT
31ftrrftr/ '<v....41 115 ft-4m 30.04.2021 URI 406,420,506 ITR,CT Writ zr-67 -Novu
RFP:r 441' V it§ 117 Itra l T tritff 4741. 107/07 3115iT,

. TTT DLF "7-01q tic-R.utu q
4rzff
- Vitv Ert. aerVU MIT ER 7R" r-.= 5 (-1Tri
-017RU"4<-1 4;1 4 .4-rA cti Vk Mt' T1. t RraT .t-tultutr TrJ
g'ilWqRtra erti
A'W• 01- 3ricm- -119 4 tTaT rt44-6.

- *1-11 KITv-ff waif wet 107/07 fti- 7 Teltr DLF 1 Tirlr41:40 9999005039q 1
Aar 02 3rirr$t zt(77-TM ?
M.A *it4q)cilvfl 2016
W4'03 3.11trQ' ?
\RN
gar 04 3i-r t Txr-41- Th-T R1iTTrTr4tir-d- 4 iTe.k4 ,1T4 ,ct clq11\ ?,)
\RN. -4# 014 .1=4.t 9--et RT tt 7,111. Thl,cr-4t t 'A °vv."'
Val 05 arcr- t -1.-ft TRIA)-41117r-T 4 <4)614711;17 31tR. 34q411<i>,-14-ir *c<ss' 17f=1 1-q#7T171;Altd <*\-11 \11'1
41 toRu3;fffizir ikst (14?
\RN - 4tr tl
Tr-af 06 qui 3ritrQ' Th-TEit f4k4114 tit zziLiN Th7 -01- t MIT l• ft57t TRiTt tiWcfs t MIT UZT47 c211-1N' rtr< -c4 qt (1-,
•‹i‹,-44- 4T1i4F ?
r")- Ft- ea Je
\30 - Ter T'OF t4c11 f;A.'t-1-‘11::*) olx A ire
A4T9' 07 4ZIT 3T17 #RT
\RN - Urt#14T (1)1 Wit ti
41-#Y 1W-9" -14tH 652/20 1141 -V-61,103 e9TIR-g:r. t1111 T). Wit t:
(5eaNS it •loicplo R-1-fl';-7,t' 2019 ;102.11• 1(74 At 4-4-Ta L47q.A.
mci'd
Pig 08 3TTLi t r
u-av- Tkzr Rkkft Tlicoici 02°19 IR, f4--drIt#1:4-6-4 3tT7 t %ft ett t 0
=1'74
tITR #R1- ferarIt cRi 3ntrr
gar 09 0-141 3trcr4 4 3fil:rtgr w=c1-44-3F-41-Tro 3tErit i' -:.s#R9.1-{l'<cf f4t411. 4 t41 RyAN')
2 ff 't5C.4)\S' ftZ3-014 2ft slort 42-r
u2fr tgect,,s- 4,) 3rt:155T TH-rcffr ftfor $"r eft cr) • r4g!t, (-1,11-) 4ft til5i 241 CA 41 3-171
?
9t71- 4,14 ft744Trci44H t cat ' 0114611 rT s
gar 10 criri 3TTI:r (44 2015 It -1-u4'j r"v:Te-45W t' 19-4-75ER 3 2T T i....qc47.s.
3TTLIA' Wz1
41"
- 3117t. 41 8 I q( liV I 611 31.4 4)4-LA qHr 12 F1331 T-1 RAlT 't5e47,5 47) Tr-dM
iqi Sir ?
\Jc-1.t - tt 4*117-i 2021 -c17 . 3T4 011 7)- 4t3T-47ITT 3177,7 2117T 16i -941.-11 .URF zR 3111' i()LA" -
gi3r 11 c1-4i 3117 2016 4 --)t-4R1R.4w -accou 47 RT79- tR. 3.TR2.•\i` 3117 t4t47.5• W:t1.4t c,140 641 (051 ZIT I
0 411i Tit R1A- zr7T 10 % 40 % cR Goo t3tR a-61.'4470 if 3T11:1- ,s1c4Tt •Icyi Ric0 tr f4Tia-
eti 3ttr5reiwtO6all
jj— (AAA&
31-.51 - 12 4-L11 31-7 k- 3I 1Tctr TrcFft - F--q:F.47 2016
wq 1 RAW Gtcu,s 4-101,1 'CR CZNN v1I
ti( 7 60
FIUTTT f'7. 2 3i17 7ur F4.7 4 2t7r ?

\3cl't -
- 13 7-7IT 3iI74 7 3Tei )rt 4T1E-t ,4•1< 4-1) Tr 2017k 1 i R-rkw ,cgc.4),s, =P519- ER' cz4t-ii,z# (-I 50 eik5
-111 2)- 3117 7TIF TOM-Q. 41-1i t ? ae"
R3f 14 (NI 3i1L1-4 371-PK 75-qt kr 2017 k 70 TT

-f2 q2I 3.03- ZR7T k qiI ci)x t aft c\ 0 •-t./
\R-H 9-gt I CIQvve-imicer.) C-cf"( -c-4\ * *62

New Chandigarh Case

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

New Chandigarh Case

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

New Chandigarh Case

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

a-k,CIA/fi 1,8°Lk-in g‘ ' I 1 Teorte- 4-,. ry''‘ti kok-A-/- e.

a() t/0;:br\ 'kin e ry\onel ot-Loe_c)

l_Ar\ arPO tAr)e-e__A a /3 IV1 t\ VVV:Al/N-0--;_ Ck. ir) di

Jr uxy\d-D al OtJA C\ We' 1.11G\,-.D k) et)

A-Ne,.5 -1kAk. tele_ voil kik C,o(re. 4-0 .----

Smt. Shibani Parti W/o Late Sh. Gautam Parti,

(D94-11 a S15 %3TT70)0111.t0 fc.,-;ftc5 19 1. (7-

2 9T1èHI 3039/t fti91-eF 28.12.19 4`)) 13141 qi) i.-i-t-Trq it I

T)M 31144511) 'c4

The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Subject: Complaint against:-

1. Gautam Parti R/o H. No. 101/7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave,

2. Shivani PartiR/o 11. No. 101/7, Silver Oaks, Qutub Enclave,

, 6. Ranjit KashyapR/o S-49/3940, 3rd floor, Block-S, Near

started investing money

Ramesh Khatkar Sio

cbiq c1/4 I -ff NT/1W 41.0 07R) ,V14.414

cOliia) 1688—P 27.12.2019 f ictRicicbci RAT Ndcfri p

aicpwoct,or I D14,P4c-1 T1 4-47-M itu

ftt-8 1lTT Trzi—t

SHO DIf Phase 1

Please let me know when can i

thank you 6'48 PM .././

I will call you back 7:01 pm

Will be waiting. Thank u _

Hi you matter soughted out or still

SHO Dlf Phase 1 El

Please let me know when can i

I will call you back

Will be waiting. Thank u 7:03 pm ,/./

Hi you matter soughted out or still

No Sir. Matter is still unresolved as I

3. f4T-# Tr-4,Ta' s 34664027287 wha a

5. -,z-trizI1c( 47- arr ;4).0 8800343774

7. t.t 1frrd7 ,,p,..1141/LtrAt

8. retPlsitrz ctia-tic.i ;to 7206363953

,act.c1 cti crck-1) (-16(1 fi-16,71(,441,( GETCO PRO , QUICK

Scanned with CamScanner

(C) prar-A., FTaT 3 1:44-14:r (-T\-1

{E} 3 ;#1 2016 2018 ciLb 37:1" ,A10-1-ttrirrj

{F} 1-tr #4. -47 '4g iT'ta-xr ertA-t 3frf

Scanned with CamScanner

{H} ?:)-ai3T !rfT

(1) KK T !--1;la 3{P-TT Zft 3 tTTIt tt# c.14).( criiclOir xr Tt f I Tf.a.

t t f c# ft ;1'1E' 4Trer Z5't 47TA .341T z-41' (-I

ciT(4) cl4cc 3ita- r4arY tr . 'At' arr-T trftart 45a-rr

xtici Mk41 tf cf'd TOT 4/rd-fd, rrff 4t P' rriT

t ' Thr zgz-th-S' IF -4a Z144 TT417-652 /20

Irt ;T-3 = 1i,,H,•-Hcirddi 'gr4

Scanned with CamScanner

e r / First Pity Dptall

Name: Gautam Bharti

lE ap_r I Second Party Detail

Purpose THIS STAMP PAPER USE FOR AGREEMENT

Through Smart phone or on tile wetsite rrttoJegras

FINAL SETTLEMENT AND PAYMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Ramesh Chancier, son of „ .. male, aged about.....years, resident

Scanned with CamScanner

(trru 154 tff vfozrr Qcti Fp)

Refused investigation due to (V rAv): or (* chliut *chii