This document provides information about a course assignment submitted by Geberegziabher Anteneh to the Addis Ababa University's Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development. The assignment discusses the concepts of urban morphology and centrality. It defines urban morphology as the study of urban spatial form and the forces that shape a city's layout. It also outlines methods for analyzing urban morphology, such as examining building footprints, heights, and densities. The document defines urban centrality as areas that are important hubs of activity. It describes methods for analyzing centrality, including surveys, space syntax analysis of urban form, and examining urban planning over time.
This document provides information about a course assignment submitted by Geberegziabher Anteneh to the Addis Ababa University's Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development. The assignment discusses the concepts of urban morphology and centrality. It defines urban morphology as the study of urban spatial form and the forces that shape a city's layout. It also outlines methods for analyzing urban morphology, such as examining building footprints, heights, and densities. The document defines urban centrality as areas that are important hubs of activity. It describes methods for analyzing centrality, including surveys, space syntax analysis of urban form, and examining urban planning over time.
This document provides information about a course assignment submitted by Geberegziabher Anteneh to the Addis Ababa University's Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development. The assignment discusses the concepts of urban morphology and centrality. It defines urban morphology as the study of urban spatial form and the forces that shape a city's layout. It also outlines methods for analyzing urban morphology, such as examining building footprints, heights, and densities. The document defines urban centrality as areas that are important hubs of activity. It describes methods for analyzing centrality, including surveys, space syntax analysis of urban form, and examining urban planning over time.
This document provides information about a course assignment submitted by Geberegziabher Anteneh to the Addis Ababa University's Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development. The assignment discusses the concepts of urban morphology and centrality. It defines urban morphology as the study of urban spatial form and the forces that shape a city's layout. It also outlines methods for analyzing urban morphology, such as examining building footprints, heights, and densities. The document defines urban centrality as areas that are important hubs of activity. It describes methods for analyzing centrality, including surveys, space syntax analysis of urban form, and examining urban planning over time.
Course Title: Integrated Urban Project III (Extension of an Existing
City Planning and Design)
Thematic Concept of Urban Morphology and Centrality
SUBMITTED BY: GEBEREGZIABHER ANTENEH
ID: UGR/4593/12
Given Date: November 17, 2022
Submission Date: November 29, 2022
Fourth Year BSc. in Urban Planning and design Regular Program Course Title: Integrated Urban Project III (Extension of an Existing City Planning and Design) individual Assignment 1: The Concept of Urban Morphology and centrality
THE CONCEPT OF URBAN MORPHOLOGY
Urban morphology is the study of urban spatial form – the assemblage of buildings and public spaces that comprise the city. It also entails analysis of the forces that produce such an assemblage and the spatial practices that are produced therein. The mapping of urban morphology requires that we treat the city as a series of distinct layers of information and then select particular layers for specific analytical purposes. In urban design, these often include building footprints, heights, types, grain size, densities, functions, movement networks and street life. The morphological analysis of the city has as its main objective the understanding of urban reality through the study of the relationships shown between the all-urban elements. This analysis also sees the city as a product of an evolutionary and dynamic process, which ponders the different techniques and socioeconomic realities that over space and time are building and transforming the urban areas. METHODS OF ANALAYSING URBAN MORPHOLOGY Firstly, city blocks are used as spatial units for morphological properties to be derived and interpreted. Secondly, the morphological properties derived are interpreted on quantitative basis. The morphological properties featured in this study are: (1) surface area per projected area; (2) volume per projected area; (3) building to land ratio; (4) mean height of buildings; (5) surface area of buildings per unit volume of buildings; and, (6) mean volume of buildings. These six properties are calculated for each block, and interpreted with attentions to their interrelationships as well as geographical distributions. This attempt reveals gradations of morphological properties of blocks in feature spaces and the geographical space, which has potentials to enable quantitative comparisons of cities domestically and internationally. THE CONCEPT OF URBAN CENTERALITY Urban centralities are seen as hubs of activity, as important elements within the structure of towns that contribute to urban vitality and fight urban failure. Urban centrality is the characteristic of a place being central to its periphery. Urban centralities are associated with a given city’s evolution, but the influence of local factors can only be perceived over long periods. METHODS OF ANALAYSING URBAN CENTERALITY The methodology adopted in this study aims to cross the results of three different approaches to highlight the emergence of urban centralities. A survey and assessment of urban centralities as proposed by Gaspar (Gaspar, 1985), a space syntax approach (Hillier, 1996; Hillier & Hanson, 1984), and a chronological urban plan analysis. The adopted methodology was applied in three stages: 1. to identify and assess urban centralities, a survey, diachronic analysis, and a centrality index (CI) were carried out, following the methods proposed by Gaspar. (Gaspar, 1985); 2. Space syntax was used to analyze the urban form characteristics, which have proved to be important with regard to the degree of attractivity of an urban space, thus helping to identify urban centralities; 3. An analysis of urban planning in Évora was carried out.