Practical - 8

Aim: Write a project closure analysis report

for term project.

Project Closure Analysis Report:

Project Name: Word Processing Software Development

Project Completion Date:

Project Team: Urvish Patel

Mayank Patel
Parth Chaudhari

Executive Summary:

The Word Processing Software Development project, initiated to create a

user-friendly and feature-rich word processing application, has reached its
successful completion. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the
project's closure, summarizing the project's goals, outcomes, challenges, and
lessons learned.

Project Objectives:

The project's primary objectives were to develop a word processing software

application that could:

 Read and format text from ASCII or HTML files.

 Store formatted text as HTML files.
 Allow users to specify the number of characters per output line
(between 1 and 132).
 Apply text processing rules, including left and right justification.
 Delimit paragraphs using the special character "PP."
 Format the first and last lines of paragraphs.
 Allow users to browse, edit, and format documents.
 Enable users to track and display document statistics.
 Permit users to save documents with custom names.
 Achievements:

The project has achieved the following significant milestones:

1. Software Development: The word processing software has been

successfully developed, featuring a user-friendly interface that supports all
specified functionalities.

2. File Format Support: The software can seamlessly read and save text in
both ASCII and HTML formats.

3. Text Processing: The software can accurately process text, applying left
and right justification, paragraph formatting, and user-specified line length.

4. User Interaction: Users can efficiently browse, edit, and format

documents. The software provides options for formatting text, including bold,
italic, superscript, and subscript.

5. Document Statistics: The software calculates and displays the number of

characters, words, lines, and paragraphs in a document.

6. Custom Saving: Users can save documents under custom names, providing
flexibility in managing their work.

Challenges Faced:

Throughout the project's lifecycle, several challenges were encountered,

including:

Complex Text Processing: Developing algorithms for complex text

processing and formatting required extensive research and development
effort.

Performance Optimization: Ensuring the software's efficiency and

responsiveness, especially for large documents, presented performance
optimization challenges.

User Interface Design: Designing an intuitive user interface that

accommodates all the required features while maintaining ease of use was a
significant challenge.

Lessons Learned:

The project provided valuable insights and lessons that can be applied to
future software development efforts:
1. Thorough Requirement Analysis: A comprehensive and well-
documented requirement analysis is essential for project success.

2. Effective Communication: Effective communication and collaboration

among team members are crucial for resolving challenges and achieving
project goals.

3. Iterative Development: Adopting an iterative development approach

allows for flexibility and adaptability during the project.

4. User-Centric Design: Prioritizing user experience and user-centric

design principles is key to creating user-friendly software.

Recommendations:

The successful completion of the Word Processing Software Development

project presents opportunities for further improvement and expansion:

1. User Feedback: Continue to gather user feedback and iterate on the

software to address additional features and enhancements based on user
needs.

2. Documentation: Develop comprehensive user manuals and technical

documentation to support end-users and future development teams.

Acknowledgments:

We would like to express our gratitude to all project team members,

stakeholders, and contributors who played a vital role in the successful
completion of this project.

Conclusion:

The Word Processing Software Development project has met its objectives
and delivered a feature-rich word processing application. By addressing
challenges and applying lessons learned, we have developed a product that
meets user needs and expectations. We look forward to further improvements
and future developments based on user feedback and evolving requirements.
Rubric wise marks obtained:

Sr. Needs
Criteria Acceptabl Goo Very Good Total
No. Improve
e d
ment
Analysis [1] [2-3] [4-5] [6-8]
Poorly Fairly Clearly Clearly
understands understan understands understands
the project ds the the project the project
1 status. project status based status based
status. on individual on individual
modules. modules can
validate
against the
requirements.
Documentati [0] [1] [2]
on Poor Fairly Presented
2 documentat presented the analysis
ion the in technical
analysis words.
and status.

Signature of Faculty:
 Practical – 9

Aim: Implementation/Prototype of term project.

**As per the term project selected

Rubric wise marks obtained:

Sr. Needs
Criteria Acceptable Goo Very Total
No. Improvem
d Good
ent
Design [0-1] [2-3] [4] [5]
Design does Design Design includes Design
not cover includes core core includes all
1 basic functionalities functionalities as functionalit
functionalitie only. well as other ies based
s. relevant on OOP
functionalities. concepts.
Steps / [0] [1-2] [3-5]
Navigatio Not familiar Familiar with Fully aware with
2 n/ with the the steps / the steps /
Business steps / business business
process business process. process.
process.
Tool usage [0] [1-2] [3-5]
Not Aware of Can use the
3 familiar tools basic tool for given
with the functionaliti problem.
tool. es.
Test Plan [0] [1-2] [3-5]
Not Test plan Test plan
4 familiar covers only covers
with the basic almost all
test plan. functionalitie the
s. scenarios for
all
functionalitie
s.

Signature of Faculty:
 Practical – 10

Aim: Presentation and Viva of term project.

**As per the term project selected

Rubric wise marks obtained:

Sr. Needs
Criteria Acceptable Goo Very Total
No. Improvem
d Good
ent
Domain [0] [1-2] [3-5]
Understand Not familiar Basic Fairly aware
1 ing with the awareness of about the
domain. the domain in domain in
terms of terms of
entities entities
and processes. and processes.
Presentati [0] [1-2] [3-5]
on Inconsist Consistent Consistent
2 content ent format. Low format with
format. readability. appropriate
Low contents.
readabilit
y.
Individual [0] [1-2] [3-4] [5]
Contributi No Partially Significantly Significan
on individual involved in contributed in tly
3 contributi any one or one or more contribut
on. two tasks. tasks. ed in one
or more
tasks.
Team Lead.
Q&A [0-5]
4 Based on the answers.

Signature of Faculty: