A

Project Report
On

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTISTOREY

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING USING ETABS

This project work is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement

for the award of Degree of Bachelor of Civil Engineering under the Faculty of
Science & Technology, RTM Nagpur University
(Session 2020 - 2021)

• Submitted by •
Abhishek .K. Dhomne, Chinmay .K. Padole, Maheshwari .S. Nagose, Pratik .S.
Hanwate, Samiksha .K. Bansod, Taniya .R. Sukhdeve
VIII Semester B. E. (Civil)

• Supervisor •
Dr. Valsson Varghese
(Head of Civil Department)

Department of Civil Engineering

K. D. K. College of Engineering, Nagpur
(2020-2021)

i
 Declaration

This Project work entitled “Analysis and Design of Multistorey Residential

Building using ETABS’’ is our own carried out under the supervision of Dr.
Valsson Varghese at Civil Engineering Department, K D K College of
Engineering, Nagpur. It is ensured that proper citation of references is done.
As far as our knowledge is concern, this work has not been submitted to any
other university for the award of any degree.

Name of the Projectee Signature

1. Abhishek .K. Dhomne

2. Chinmay .K. Padole
3. Maheshwari .S. Nagose
4. Pratik .S. Hanwate
5. Samiksha .K. Bansod
6. Taniya .R. Sukhdeve

i
 Department of Civil Engineering
K D K College of Engineering, Nagpur

Certificate

This is to certify that the project work entitled “Analysis and Design of
Multistorey Residential Building using ETABS’’ is submitted by the following
students of VIII Semester B. E. (Civil).
Names of Student

1 Abhishek .K. Dhomne 2 Chinmay .K. Padole

3 Maheshwari .S. Nagose 4 Pratik .S. Hanwate
5 Samiksha .K. Bansod 6 Taniya .R. Sukhdeve

is a bonafied work done under my/our supervision. This project work is

submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Degree of
Bachelor of Civil Engineering under the Faculty of Science & Technology;
RTM Nagpur University, Nagpur during the Academic Year 2018 – 2019.

• Name of Supervisor •
Dr. Valsson Varghese
(Head of Civil Department)

Dr. Valsson Varghese D. P. Singh

Professor & Head, CED Principal
K D K College of Engineering K D K College of Engineering
Nagpur Nagpur

External Examiner

ii
 Acknowledgement

We have great pleasure in expressing our most sincere regards and deep sense
of gratitude to our Project Supervisor Dr. Valsson Varghese for his able
guidance and valuable suggestion.
We would to like to express our deep sense of gratitude to our respected Dr.
Valsson Varghese, Professor & Head, Department of Civil Engineering, K
D K College of Engineering, Nagpur for his encouragement and support.
We feel happy to extend our heartfelt thanks to the Principal, Dr. D P Singh
and Vice-Principal, Dr. A M Badar for being a source of inspiration &
motivation.
Last but not least we would like to thank entire Civil Engineering Department,
our parents and all our friends who have helped us in completing this task
successfully.

Projectee

Abhishek .K. Dhomne

Chinmay .K. Padole
Maheshwari .S. Nagose
Pratik .S. Hanwate
Samiksha .K. Bansod
Taniya .R. Sukhdeve

iii
 Abstract
Structural Analysis is a branch which includes in the determination of conduct of constructions
to anticipate the reactions of various underlying segments because of the impact of loads. Every
single construction will be exposed to possibly one or the gatherings of loads, the different sorts
of loads typically considered are dead loads, live loads, wind load IS:875-1987 Part1, 2, 3,
seismic load(IS:1893-2016). ETABS (Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building
System) is a product which is joined with all the significant forces that are static, dynamic,
Linear and non-direct, and so on. This Computer programming's are additionally being utilized
for the computation of forces, bending moment, stress, strain &deformation or diversion for a
complex underlying framework and this software is utilized to design and plan the structures.
The study of this project is to analyze & design of Reinforced Concrete building using Etabs.
By this project, it has been checked that the displacement of the building seems to be within
permissible limit’. The Structure has been designed as per Indian Codes & by laws provided by
that area.
In this paper, an analysis has been done on the storey height of a building situated in zone V,
keeping the base dimensions constant, to find the maximum bending and shear forces at the
design for earthquake load, using the software ETABS. For earthquake loads, both dynamic and
static analysis has been done. The analysis for seismic loads has been carried out. Thereafter,
the graphs for different values displacement at all the storey drifts, due to earthquake load (EQ)
have been plotted.

iv
 Figure Index
Sr. Title of Figure Page
No. No.
1 Plan of G+4 Reinforced Concrete building (all dimensions are in meter) 13
2 Structure in 1-D:-Frame A-A 13
3 Structure in 1-D:-Frame 1-1 14
4 Live Loads acting on the Structure 15
5 Wall Loads acting on the Structure 15
6 Floor loads acting on the structure 16
7 3D view of the structure 16
8 BMD of the Structure 17
9 Plan in AutoCAD 18
10 Summary of Material Properties 19
11 Summary of Frame Sections 19
12 Summary of Slab Sections 20
13 Summary of Reinforcing Bar Sizes 20
14 Base Loads acting on the Structure 21
15 Wall Loads on Structure 22
16 Dead Loads on Structure 22
17 Live Loads on Structure 23
18 Comparison of Shear Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and Columns 28
19 Comparison of Bending Moments acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and 29
Columns
20 Comparison of Torsional Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and 30
Columns
21 Comparison of Axial Loads acting at Corner, Centre and Front Columns 31
22 DirectX Graphics in ETABS 35
23 Multiple Views of the Plan 36
24 Navigation of a High-Rise Building 36
25 Data Input Windows 37
26 Physical Model 37
27 Analytical Model 38

v
 Table Index

Sr. Title of Table Page

No. No.
1 Types of Loads and their Load values 14
2 Properties of steel bar and concrete as per IS 456 17
3 Beam and column length and their Cross Section 18
4 Load Patterns 21
5 Applied story forces 25
6 Applied story forces 26
7 Loads Combinations 26
8 Comparison of Shear Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams 28
and Columns
9 Comparison of Bending Moments acting at Corner, Centre and Front 29
Beams and Columns
10 Comparison of Torsional Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front 30
Beams and Columns
11 Comparison of Axial Loads acting at Corner, Centre and Front Columns 31

12 Percentage difference in axial load on different positions of columns 32

13 Percentage difference in bending moments on different positions of 33
beams

vi
 Index
Particulars Page No.

Declaration i

Certificate ii

Acknowledgement iii

Abstract iv

Figure Index v

Table Index vi

Chapter Scheme Page No.

Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Overview 1
1.2 Aim 2
1.3 Objective 2

Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Background Study 3
2.2 Summary of Literature Review (tabular form) 10

Chapter 3: Codal Provisions 12

Chapter 4: Materials &Methodology

4.1 Structural Modelling 17
4.2 Materials 18
4.3 Methodology 27

Chapter 5: Observation, Data Collection, Interpretation

& Calculation
4.1 Observations 31
4.2 Calculations 33

Chapter 6: Results & Discussion

5.1 Results & Discussions 34

Chapter 7: Application 38

vii
Chapter 8: Future Scope of Work 39

Chapter 9: Paper presentation details

copy of certificate, award, etc. 50

Chapter 10: Plagiarism Report 56

Chapter 11: References 42

Annexure – I: PO, PSO Attainment

(with brief details of attainment) 43

Annexure – II: Resume

(of all projectee with recent photograph) 51

viii
Chapter 1 : Introduction
1.1 Overview
The imaginative and progressive new ETABS is a definitive incorporated programming bundle
for the underlying investigation and plan of structures .ETABS offers unrivaled 3D article based
demonstrating and perception apparatuses , blazingly quick straight and nonlinear logical force
, refined and complete plan capacities for a wide-scope of materials and keen realistic
presentations , reports and schematic drawings that permit clients to rapidly and effectively
interpret and get examination and configuration results. ETABS is designing programming
which is utilized to examination and plan multi-story building. ETABS represents Extended
Three-Dimensional (3D) Analysis of Building Systems. Computer aided design drawings can
be changed over straightforwardly into ETABS models or utilized as layouts in which ETABS
articles might be overlaid.
A significant number of the floor levels in structures are comparable which decrease
demonstrating and configuration time. Quick model age utilizing the idea of comparable stories.
Various materials can be allotted to the primary components inside a similar model like steel,
RCC, composite or some other client characterized material. Computer aided design drawings
can be changed over straightforwardly into ETABS models or utilized as formats in which
ETABS items might be overlaid. Report is produced straightforwardly in the product with
complete support subtleties. Large numbers of the floor levels in structures are comparative
which lessen demonstrating and configuration time. Quick model age utilizing the idea of
comparative stories. Various materials can be appointed to the primary components inside a
similar model like steel, RCC, composite or some other client characterized material.
The process of design commences with planning of a structure, primarily to meet the functional
requirement of the user or the clients. The functional requirements and the parts of aesthetics
are investigated typically by an engineer while the aspects of security, workableness, durability
and economy of the construction for its expected use over life span of the construction are gone
to be structural designers.
Stability: To forestall overturning, sliding or buckling of the structure or parts/members of it
comes under the activity loads.
Strength: To oppose securely the pressure incited by the heap in the different primary
individuals.
Serviceability: To guarantee the execution under service load condition which suggests giving
of sufficient stiffness to contain deflection , break width, vibrations within necessary cutoff and
giving in permeability, strength and so forth.

1
1.2 Aim
Analysis and Design of Multistorey Residential Building using ETABS.

1.3 Objectives
• Learning of ETABS.
• Study of Literature Review.
• Selection of sample model and manual evaluation of frame structure.
• G+4 model selection.
• Analysis by using ETABS software.
• Comparison of results obtained from ETABS software.
• Compilation of Analysis.

2
Chapter 2 : Literature Review
2.1 Background Study
Literature review is an important part of the study as it helps into the understanding of the
processes and analysis of the research. The basic intention of our literature review is to give a
comprehensive review of previous works on the area of seismic design and better accuracy of
the analysis can be obtained by using this software. In this review, we will focus on the
experience. The analysis was done using the software package ETAB and drawing details in
AutoCAD and REVIT. The literature review will try to establish the link between past research,
work done on this topic and this study to determine its relevancy and thorough understanding.
The structural components were designed manually in addition to the software design. This
training helped to understand and analyze the structural problem faced by the construction
industry. Calculation by software analysis gives results within the permissible limit according
to IS code. Further the work is extended for a – storey building and found that the results are
matching. As the multi-storey building has similar floors ETABS is the perfect software which
can be adopted for analysis and design. Usage of ETABS software reduces the time required
for analysis and design. We can easily add or remove the storey of the building.
This project is designed as per INDIAN CODES- IS 1893-part2:2002, IS 456:2000. This
analysis is carried out by considering severe seismic zones and behavior is assessed by taking
type-medium stiff Soil condition. In our project we are considering a plan under zone –V.
Seismic Intensity is Severe, and Zone Factor is 0.36.
Literature survey was performed using various relevant books and journal papers dealing with
performance based design, study on Analysis and Design of Residential building by using
ETABS. This also includes review of previous research related to the above areas.

Various literature collected are briefly described below:

3
 2.2 Summary of Literature Review (tabular form)

Sr. No. 1.

Author Name DR. K. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY & G. LALITH KUMAR

Journal Name International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern

Engineering & Science (IJTIMES)

Aim Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Buildings (G+30) by Using ETABS

Objective To study irregularities in structural analysis and design of G+30 storeys

structure as per code (IS 1893:2002). To study the behavior of structure
without masonry infill if seismic load is applied. Determination of
displacements subjected to earthquake loading from zone to zone. To find
out the bending moment and shear force selecting any one section for
various seismic zones. Time history analysis subjected to intermediate
frequency ground motion for the response of regular buildings and
compared to the response of spectrum analysis for the same.

Methodology In the present study, analysis of G+30 multi-story building in all seismic
zones for wind and earthquake forces is carried out.3D model is prepared
for G+30 multi-story building using ETABS. Dynamic analysis will be
carried out either by Response spectrum method or site specific Time
history method.

Conclusion Behavior of the high rise building was shown clearly using the graphs
and lateral displacements. It is found that the lateral displacements or
drifts are more in zone 5 when compared to the zones 4, 3&2. It is also
found that from the base reactions of structure obtained in zone 5, the
story shear is higher in zone 5 than in zone 2. Better accuracy of the
analysis can be obtained by using this software.

4
Sr. No. 2.

Author Name DANISH IRFAN, MANOJ M.C, Dr. S. VARADRAJAH

Journal Name International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

(IRJET)

Aim Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (G+4) Using

ETABS

Objective We have analyzed & designed Residential building (G+4) using E-tabs. In
this research paper E-tabs has been used to analyze & design of Reinforced
concrete building (G+4).This structure has been constructed in Bangalore,
Karnataka.

Methodology The building has been analyzed & designed as per Indian Standard
conformation codes & after analysis & design, here an attempt has been
made to understand the behavior of the building. The building has been
analyzed & designed using Limit state method. The structure has been
checked for wind load & Seismic loads (lateral loads also).

Conclusion Fig shows the base reaction summary these reaction has been generated from
the software. From table it has been briefly explained that the moments has
been on higher side so foundation should be designed properly or else use
SAFE software of CSI. It has been evident that from fig ,top of the structure
has higher wind intensity forces compared to the height of the building
increases wind load also increases on to From Figure the horizontal and
vertical deflections seems to be allowed as the permissible limit 20mm.

5
Sr.No. 3.

Author Name NIRMAL S. MEHTA , URMI D. MODI , PARTH R. PATEL ,

RUTVIK M. PRAJAPATI

Journal Name Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research

(JETIR) .

Aim Analysis and Design of Multi Storey Residential Building Using

E-TABS.

Objective Analysis of value of lateral forces from bottom floor to top floor. The
performance of building during earthquake using different load
combination.

Methodology This model is consisting of basement, ground floor, ten storey and
terrace with overhead water tank. According to IS 1893:2002, this
area comes under zoning III. 1.the 3D-view of the model in ETABS.
2. The structural plan. Loads and load combinations are considered
according to IS 875:1987 (Part 1 to 5) and IS 1893:2002 (Part-1).

Conclusion According to the IS 1893:2002 maximum allowable drift is 0.004 ℎ,

which is 16 mm for considered building. The results obtain for storey
drift is very less as compared to maximum allowable drift. The storey
drift in X direction is more than Y direction. Centre of mass and center
of stiffness of floor are depending on the size and orientation of
column as well as shear wall.

6
Sr. No. 4.

Author Name S ABHISHEK, MANOJ S K, ROOPA B D, BHAGYASHREE M S,

GURUPRASAD C H M.

Journal Name International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

(IRJET).

Aim Design and Analysis of Residential Building using E-TABS.

Objective Modeling the building using the software ETABS V.9. Applying gravity
loads and different load combinations as per Indian Codal provision.
Analyzing and designing of Residential building (G+5) for worst case of
load combination.

Methodology Preparation of plan in AutoCAD. Importing to E-tabs Building modeling

in ETABS. Defining and assigning of materials Manual design (as per
IS456- 2000 SP-16). Assigning loads as per IS 456-2000. Analyze the
building model. Check results. Design using E-tabs software.

Conclusion Further procedure of Dynamic analysis of the multi-story buildings will

be kept with the company and learned what they gives design works with
period of internship. The Internship gave ample exposure to the field
practice in the modeling, analysis and design of the multi storied
buildings and various construction techniques used in the industry. The
analysis was done using the software package ETAB and drawing details
in AutoCAD and REVIT. The structural components were designed
manually in addition to the software design. This training helped to
understand and analyze the structural problem faced by the construction
industry. Site visits also gave an exposure to the industry.

7
Sr. No. 5.

Author Name GURUDATH C , ARUN KUMAR SAH , MANOJ KUMAR SAH ,

RAM BABU SHARMA, RAMESH SAH.

Journal Name International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology.(IJIRT)

Aim Analysis and Design of Commercial Building Using ETABS.

Objective The main objective of this study is to analyze and design a G+2
commercial building using ETABS software. To design structural
components like beam, slab, column and footing using ETABS.
Comparison of results obtained from ETABS software with IS code.

Methodology It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create,
modify, analyze, design, and optimize building models. Analysis of Shear
force, Bending Moment, Displacement, Storey Drift, Deflection.

Conclusion Analysis was done by using ETABS software and successfully verified as
per IS456:2000. Calculation by software analysis gives results within the
permissible limit according to IS code. Further the work is extended for a
– storey building and found that the results are matching. As the 3-storey
building has similar floors ETABS is the perfect software which can be
adopted for analysis and design. Usage of ETABS software minimizes the
time required for analysis and design. We can easily add and remove the
storey of the building.

8
Sr. No. 6.

Author Name ALI KADHIM SALLAL.

Journal Name International Journal of Research in Advanced Engineering and

Technology.

Aim Design and analysis ten storied building using ETABS software-2016.

Objective The main purpose of this software is to design and analysis multi-Storied
building in a systematic process. This paper present a building where designed
and analyzed under effect of earthquake and wind pressure by using ETABS
software.

Methodology Step by Step procedure for ETABS Analysis. Create the Grid points and
Generation of structure. Assigning of wind loads. Assigning of Seismic loads.
Assigning of load combinations. Analysis After the completed all the above
steps, now performed the analysis and check all the errors. After completed the
analysis, now performed concrete design on the structure as per IS 456: 2000
(Indian code).

Conclusion The value of dead, live and floor finish loads obtained by the ETABS program
are similar to the manually calculated values. The analysis results of the
structural integrity of building in withstanding the design earthquake loadings
was conducted and was judged to be safe. Various important results like
bending moments, shear force and deflection results are similar to the manually
calculated values.

9
Sr. No. 7.

Author Name AHMED A. TORKY and YOUSSEF F. RASHED.

Journal Name Journal of Computational Design and Engineering.

Aim High-performance practical stiffness analysis of high-rise buildings using

super floor elements.

Objective This study develops a high-performance computing method using Open ACC
(Open Accelerator) for the stiffness matrix and load vector generation of
shear-deformable plates.

Methodology A list of structural properties and loadings for the examples in this section is
presented, where each structural floor’s dimensions are also stated. Example
1 is a verification example of the straining actions’ accuracy of the fast super
floor element method in comparison with BEM results. Example 2
demonstrates a case where only column supports exist and their numbers
increase dramatically. Examples 3 and 4 include actual industrial level
practical examples to show the viability and effectiveness of the Open ACC
implementation on real structural floors’ engineering computation.
Computation is carried out in mixed double and single precisions.

Conclusion The examples demonstrated that computing the super floor element stiffness
matrix and load vector is feasible on accelerators, especially if geometrical
accuracy of huge structural floor/building models is to be maintained without
the need for excessive internal meshing.

10
Chapter 3 : Codal Provisions
INDIAN STANDARDS ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Bureau of Indian standards, the National Standard Body of India, is a Statutory Organization
under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act 1986. One of the activity is formulation of Indian
Standards on different subjects of Engineering through various Division Councils. The Civil
Engineering Division Council is responsible for standardization in the field of Civil Engineering
including Structural Engineering, Building materials and components, Planning Design,
Construction and Maintenance of Civil Engineering Structures, Construction Practices, Safety
in Building etc. These standards are evolved based on consensus principle through a network of
technical committee comprising representatives from Research and Development
Organizations, Consumers, Industry, Testing Labs and Govt. Organizations etc.
The Civil Engineering Division Council is working towards to achieve the above goal through
35 Sectional Committees covering wide range of subjects and one of the Sectional Committee
is Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 39.
India is one of the most disaster prone countries, vulnerable to almost all natural and man-made
disasters. About 85% area is vulnerable to one or multiple disasters and about 57% area is in
high seismic zone including the capital of the country. Disaster prevention involves engineering
intervention in buildings and structures to make them strong enough to withstand the impact of
natural hazard or to impose restrictions on land use so that the exposure of the society to the
hazard situation is avoided or minimized.
Himalayan-Nagalushai region, Indo-Gangetic plain, Western India and Cutch and Kathiawar
regions are geologically unstable parts of the country and some devastating earthquakes of the
world have occurred there. A major part of peninsular India has also been visited by strong
earthquakes, but these were relatively few in number and had considerably lesser intensity. It
has been a long felt need to rationalize the earthquake resistant design and construction of
structures considering seismic data from studies of these earthquakes. It is to serve this purpose;
Bureau of Indian Standards has rendered invaluable services by producing a number of national
standards in the field of Design and Construction of Earthquake Resistant Structures and also
in the field of measurement and tests connected therewith. A detail of Indian Standards in the
area of mitigation of natural hazard of earthquake is given underneath.
IS 1893(Part 1):2002 `Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures : Part 1
General provisions and Buildings’
This standard contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all structures. Also,
it contains provisions that are specific to buildings only. It covers general principles and design
criteria, combinations, design spectrum, main attributes of buildings, dynamic analysis, apart
from seismic zoning map and seismic coefficients of important towns, map showing epicenters,
map showing tectonic features and lithological map of India.
Following are the major and important modifications made in this revision:
a) The seismic zone map is revised with only four zones, instead of five. Erstwhile Zone I
has been merged to Zone II and hence Zone I does not appear in the new zoning; only
Zones II, III, IV and V do. The killari area has been included in Zone III and necessary
modifications made, keeping in view the probabilistic Hazard Evaluation. The Bellary
isolated zone has been removed. The parts of eastern coast area have shown similar hazard
to that of the killari area, the level of Zone II has been enhanced to Zone III and connected
with Zone III of Godavari Graben area.

b) This revision adopts the procedure of first calculating the actual force that may be
experienced by the structure during the probable maximum earthquake, if it were to remain
elastic. Then the concept of response reduction due to ductile deformation or frictional
energy dissipation in the cracks is brought into the code explicitly, by introducing the
`response reduction factor’ in place of the earlier performance factor.

11
c) The values of seismic zone factors have been changed; these now reflect more realistic
values of effective peak ground acceleration considering Maximum Considered
Earthquake (MCE) and service life of structure in each seismic zone.
d) A clause has been introduced to restrict the use of foundations vulnerable to differential
settlements in severe seismic zones.
Here it is worthwhile to mention that it is not intended in this standard to lay down regulation
so that no structure shall suffer any damage during earthquake of all magnitudes. It has been
endeavored to ensure that as far as, possible structures are able to respond, without structural
damage to shocks of moderate intensities and without total collapse to shocks of heavy
intensities.
Proposed provisions for beam-column joints
Minimum column size
Clause 1.0
The minimum dimension of column shall not be less than (a) 15 times the largest beam bar
diameter of the longitudinal reinforcement in the beam passing through or anchoring into the
column joint, and (b) 300 mm.
Commentary 1.0 A small column width may lead to following two problems : (a) the moment
capacity of column section is very low since the lever arm between the compression steel and
tension steel is very small, and (b) beam bars do not get enough anchorage in the column (both
at exterior and interior joints).
Hence, many seismic codes recommend that the dimension of an interior column should not be
less than 20 times the diameter of largest beam bar running parallel to Sudhir K. Jain, R.K. Ingle
and Goutam Mondal 28 The Indian Concrete Journal * August 2006 that column dimension that
is, if beams use 20 mm diameter bars, minimum column width should be 400 mm. The proposed
provision for minimum column size has been kept lower than the current international codes
keeping in mind the practice in India where much smaller column sections are currently being
used than what is common in other seismic countries like USA and New Zealand.
The existing clause no. 7.1.2 of IS 13920 : 1993 specifies the minimum dimension of columns
as, the minimum dimension of the member shall not be less than 200 mm. However, in frames
which have beams with centre to centre span exceeding 5 m or columns of unsupported length
exceeding 4 m, the shortest dimension of the column shall not be less than 300 mm. It is
proposed to revise this clause as per clause 1.0 of this paper .
Wide beam
Clause 1.2.4
If the width of beam exceeds corresponding column dimension, transverse reinforcement as
required by clause nos. 7.4.7 and 7.4.8 of IS 13920 : 1993 shall be provided through the joint to
provide confinement for longitudinal beam reinforcement outside the column core if such
confinement August 2006 * The Indian Concrete Journal 29 is not provided by a beam framing
into the joint. In such a case, the value of width of beam bb should be less than the values of
3bc and bc +1.5hc , where bc and hc are the column width and depth, respectively.
Commentary 1.2.4
This clause refers to the wide beam, that is, the width of the beam exceeds the corresponding
column dimension. In that case, the beam reinforcement not confined by the column
reinforcement should be provided lateral support either by a girder framing into the same joint
or by transverse reinforcement. The limit of maximum width of wide beam is specified to ensure
the formation of beam plastic hinge.

12
Chapter 4: Materials and Methodology
4.1: Structural Modelling
4.a Overview
In this chapter, description of Residential building is presented. In section 4.2 four story regular
reinforced concrete building is elaborated. In next section 4.3 material properties of both steel
and concrete are shown. In next section 4.4 dead load , live load , earthquake load , super dead
loads as well as combination of various loads are presented at the end structural elements are
introduced .
4.b Regular Reinforced Concrete Building
A four storied reinforced concrete building is considered. Beam length in transverse direction
(x) are 4 m (3 members), 2m and 3m and beams in longitudinal direction (z) are 4m and 3m.
Figure (a) shows the plan of fourth story Residential building having 5 bays in x-direction and
2 bays in x-direction. Story height of the building is taken as 3m (same for each floors). Figure
(b) shows frames of the four story Reinforced Concrete Residential building. Cross section of
the beam is 350x350 mm and cross section of the column is 450x 450 mm.

Figure (1) Plan of G+4 Reinforced Concrete building (all dimensions are in meter)

Figure (2) Frame A-A

13
 Figure (3) Frame 1-1
4.c. General Data

Structure = G + 4
Floor height (For each floors) = 3m
Grade of concrete (for every structural elements) = M30 (IS 456-2000)
Grade of Steel (for every structural elements) = Fe500 (IS 800-2007)
Beam size = 350 x 350 mm
Column size = 450 x 450 mm
The wall loads are taken as 6.21 KN/m2 and 12.45 KN/m2 for every inner and outer walls
respectively. A slab load of 3.75 KN/m2 is taken for analysis. A floor finish load of 1.5 KN/m2
is applied on all beams of RC building and considered for analysis as per IS 875 (part1). A live
load of 2 KN/m2 is provided as per IS 875 (part2). Below table shows the gravity loads taken
for the building.
Table 1:- Types of Loads and their Load values
Types of loads Load values IS Code confirmation
Dead load Self-weight IS 875 Part-1
Live load 2 KN/m2 -all places IS 875 Part-2
Floor finish 1.5 KN/m2 IS 875 Part-1
Super dead load 6.21 KN/m2 -inner wall IS 875 Part-1
loads
Super dead load 12.45 KN/m2 outer wall IS 875 Part-1
loads

The structure is then analyzed and designed for live load, seismic load as per IS-1893:2002
and dead load consisting of self-weight of beams, columns and slabs and floors. Following
figures show the different type of loads acting on the building.

14
Figure (4) Live Loads acting on the Structure

Figure (5) Wall Loads acting on the Structure

15
Figure(6) Floor loads acting on the structure

Figure(7) 3D view of the structure

16
 Figure(8) BMD of the structure
4.2 Materials
Properties of materials – following table shows the assumed values of steel bar and concrete
taken as per IS 456:2000.
Table 2:- Properties of steel bar and concrete as per IS 456
Steel Bar Properties Concrete section Properties
2
Unit Weight 76.9729 KN/m Unit Weight 24.9926 KN/m3
(γs) (γc)

Modulus of 21000 Mpa Modulus of elasticity 27386.13 Mpa

elasticity
Poisson ratio 0.3 Poisson ratio 0.2
(νs) (νc)

Thermal coefficient 0.0000117 Mpa Thermal coefficient 0.0000055

(αs) (αc)

Shear modulus 80769.23 Mpa Shear modulus 11410.89 Mpa

(ςs) (ςc)

17
 Yield strength 379.5 Mpa Damping ratio 5%
(ϛc)

Compressive 495 Mpa Compressive strength 30

strength (Fc)
(Fs)

Structural Elements
A four story symmetrical reinforced concrete residential building was analyzed for seismic
loadings in ETABS software. For doing the comparative study, dimensions of beam and
columns are taken as 350mm x 350mm and 450mm x 450mm respectively. Story height is taken
as 3m for each stories and beam length is taken as 4m, 2m, 3m in longitudinal direction and 4m
and 3m in transverse direction. These dimensions and cross sections are shown in below table.
Table 3: Beam and column length and their Cross Section.
Structural Elements Cross section (mm x mm) Length (m)
Beam in longitudinal 350 x 350 4m (three numbers )
Direction (x) 2m
3m
Beam in Transverse 350 x 350 4m
Direction(z) 3m
Columns 450 x 450 4m

4.3 Methodology
Importing floor plan using AutoCAD:

Figure(9) Plan in AutoCAD

18
Analysis in ETABS
Material properties: Summary

Figure(10) Summary of Material Properties

Frame Sections: Summary

M30 Grade concrete Fe500 Steel

350mm X 350mm 450 mm x 450 mm

Figure(11) Summary of Frame Sections

19
Slab Sections: Summary

Slab 150
Figure(12) Summary of Slab Sections

Reinforcing Bar Sizes: Summary

Figure(13) Summary of Reinforcing Bar Sizes

20
Framing of model:

Figure(14) Base Loads acting on the Structure

Load Patterns:
Table 4:- Load Patterns

21
Load calculations
Dead Loads
Cross sectional dimensions are assumed initially to estimate the dead load from the known
weights of the structure. Values of the unit weights of the materials and unit weight of the overall
structure are specified in IS 875:1987 (Part 1). So the dead loads assigned on the ground floor
is shown in the following figure.
Unit weight of Concrete = 30 Kn/m3.
Here sample calculation is done:
Wall load
a) Outer wall load (9 Inch wall)
(Wall thickness = 9 inch = 0.23m)
= Wall thickness x height of floors x density of Bricks
= 0.23 x 3 x 18
= 12.45 KN/m2
b) Inner wall load (4.5 Inch wall)
(Wall thickness = 4.5 inch = 0.115m)
= Wall thickness x height of floors x density of Bricks
= 0.115 x 3 x 18
= 6.25 KN/m2

Figure(15) Wall Loads on Structure

Dead load
Floor finish = 1.5 KN/m2 (as per IS 875 part 1)
Total floor load = 1.5 KN/m2

Figure(16) Dead Loads on Structure

22
Live Loads
Live loads are also known as imposed loads which consists of all loads other than dead loads
on the structure. The standard loading values are stipulated in IS 875:1987 (part2). The assigned
live loads on the ground floor considered are shown in following figure.

Figure(17) Live Loads on Structure

Earthquake Forces
Earthquakes generate waves which move from the origin of its location with velocities
depending upon the intensities and magnitudes of the earthquake. The impact of earthquake on
the structure depends on the stiffness of the soil medium, stiffness of the structure, height and
location of the structure etc. The earthquake forces are prescribed in IS 1893:2002 (Part 1).
The building zone comes under zone 5. And the calculation of seismic base shear was done as
per IS 1893:2002 (part 1).The base shear or total design lateral force along with any principle
direction shall be determined by the following expression

VB = Ah x W
Where,
VB = Design base shear
Ah = Design horizontal seismic coefficient based on fundamental time period, and type of soil
W = Seismic weight of the building

The design horizontal seismic coefficient,

Ah = ZISa /RSg
Where,
Z = zone factor, for maximum considered earthquake and service life of the structure in a zone.
The factor Z in the denominator is used so as to reduce the maximum considered earthquake
zone factor to factor for design basic earthquake (DBE),
I = importance factor, depending upon the functional use of structures, characterized by
hazardous consequences of failure, post-earthquake functional needs, historical value or
economic importance (table 6 of IS 1893 (Part 1):2002)
R = response reduction factor, depending on the perceived seismic damage performance of the
structure, characterized by ductile or brittle deformations. However, the ratio (I/R) shall not be
greater than 1.0. Value for buildings are given in table 7 of IS 1893 (part 1):2002.
Sa/Sg = Average response acceleration coefficient, Sa/Sg is determined on the basis of
approximate fundamental natural period of vibration on both directions.

Natural period of vibration,

Ta = 0.09 x h / √d

23
As per IS 1893:2002 (part-I) earthquake loads are calculated. Structure belongs to seismic zone
5
Seismic zone coefficient, Z =0.36
Response Reduction factor, R = 5
Importance factor, I =1
Site type = II

Auto Seismic Loading

IS 1893:2002 Auto Seismic Load Calculation
This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral earthquake loads for load pattern
Eqx according to IS1893 2002,
As calculated by ETABS software
Direction and Eccentricity
Direction = X
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified
User Period T = 0.850 sec
Factors and Coefficients
Seismic Zone Factor,
Z = 0.36
Importance Factor,
I=1
Response Reduction factor,
R=5
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration
Coefficient, SA /g = 2.5/T SA /g = 2.5

Calculated Base Shear

24
Applied story forces

Table5:- Applied story forces

Direction =Y
Structural Period
Period Calculation Method = User Specified
User Period T = 0.850 sec
Factors and Coefficients
Seismic Zone Factor,
Z = 0.36
Importance Factor,
I=1
Response Reduction factor,
R=5
Seismic Response
Spectral Acceleration
Coefficient, SA /g = 2.5/T SA /g = 2.5

Calculated Base Shear

25
Applied story forces

Table 6:- Applied story forces

Load Combinations
Design of the structures would have become highly expensive in order to maintain either
serviceability and safety if all types of forces which would act on all structures at all times.
Accordingly, the concept of characteristics loads has been accepted to ensure at least 95 percent
of the cases, the characteristic loads are to be calculated on the basis of average/mean load of
some automatic combinations of all loads mentioned above. IS 456:2000, IS 875:1987 (Part-5)
and IS 1893(part-I):2002 stipulates the combination of the loads to be considered in the design
of the structures. The different combinations used are shown below:
Table 7:- Loads Combinations

26
All these combinations are built in the ETABS 2018. Analysis results from the critical
combinations are used for the design of Structural member.
Abbreviations used,
DL - Dead load
LL - Live load
ELx - Earthquake load in x direction
ELz- Earthquake load in z direction.

27
 Chapter 5: Observation, Data Collection, Interpretation & Calculation
5.1 Observations
a) Shear force table
Table 8:- Comparison of Shear Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and Columns

Beam Column
(KN) (KN)
Ground First Second Third Fourth Ground First Second Third Fourth
Corner 99.5 102.71 99.93 92.810 87.11 7.122 20.12 20.41 19.49 34.29

Centre 101.53 104.71 102.24 95.485 90.203 18.219 25.954 23.94 21.39 28.177

Front 70.647 69.625 70.239 70.633 73.382 17.56 23.737 21.512 18.78 21.798

Shear Force at Corner Beams and Shear Force at Centre Beams Shear Force at Front Beams and
Columns and Columns Columns

Figure(18) Comparison of Shear Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and
Columns

28
 b) Bending moment table
Table 9:- Comparison of Bending Moments acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and
Columns

Beam Column
KN-m KN-m
Ground First Second Third Fourth Ground First Second Third Fourth

Corner 79.278 85.434 80.293 68.293 55.186 21.260 21.635 23.012 18.979 48.1154

Centre 79.976 86.090 81.484 70.7366 57.6148 27.481 39.535 34.511 31.7355 35.762

Front 79.976 86.090 46.675 47.827 45.886 27.481 36.176 30.703 27.54 29.938

Bending Moment at Corner Bending Moment at Centre Bending Moment at Front

Beams and Columns Beams and Columns Beams and Columns

Figure(19) Comparison of Bending Moments acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and
Columns

29
 c) Torsional force table
Table 10:- Comparison of Torsional Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and
Columns

Beams Columns
(KN) (KN)
Ground First Second Third Fourth Ground First Second Third Fourth

Corner 0.3318 0.3071 0.2883 0.334 0.4077 0.4077 0.594 0.5289 0.390 0.279

Centre 0.3739 0.3631 0.362 0.2922 0.2587 0.4058 0.5908 0.5369 0.441102 0.2587

Front 0.1672 0.1637 0.2085 0.1552 0.1743 0.4055 0.5977 0.5401 0.4044 0.2651

Torsion at Corner Beams and Torsion at Center Beams and Torsion at Front Beams and
Columns Columns Columns

Figure(20) Comparison of Torsional Forces acting at Corner, Centre and Front Beams and
Columns

30
 d) Axial Load on column
Table 11:- Comparison of Axial Loads acting at Corner, Centre and Front Columns

Columns
KN-m
Ground First Second Third Fourth
Corner 728.3868 584.90 444.99 302.58 155.518

Centre 815.112 653.305 496.914 338.136 175.496

Front 962.88 765.97 561.88 362.459 174.118

Axial Loads at Front

Axial Loads at Corner Columns Axial Loads at Centre
Columns
Columns

Figure(21) Comparison of Axial Loads acting at Corner, Centre and Front Columns

31
5.2 Calculations & Interpretation
Table 12:- Percentage difference in axial load on different positions of columns
a) Front column
Floor Axial load (KN/m²) Difference Percentage increase
Ground floor 962.88
-196.91 20.45%
First floor 765.97
-204.09 26.64%
Second floor 561.88
-199.421 35.49%
Third floor 362.459
-188.341 51.96%
Fourth floor 174.118

b) Centre column
Floor Axial load (KN/m²) Difference Percentage increase

Ground floor 815.112

-161.807 19.85%
First floor 653.305
-156.391 23.93%
Second floor 496.914
-158.778 31.95%
Third floor 338.136
-162.64 48.098%
Fourth floor 175.496

c) Corner column
Floor Axial load (KN/m²) Difference Percentage increase
Ground floor 728.386
-143.482 19.698%
First floor 584.904
-139.914 23.921%
Second floor 444.99
-142.41 32.002%
Third floor 302.58
-147.062 48.602%
Fourth floor 155.518

32
 Table 13:- Percentage difference in bending moment on different positions beams
a) Front beam

Floor Bending Moment Difference Percentage Increase

Ground 101.5311
3.1817 3.1337%
First Floor 104.7128
-2.4705 2.359%
Second Floor 102.2423
-6.7577 6.609%
Third Floor 95.4846
-5.2809 5.530%
Fourth Floor 90.2037

b) Centre beam

Floor Bending Moment Difference Percentage Increase

Ground 79.9769
6.114 7.6447%
First Floor 86.0909
-39.4194 45.7881%
Second Floor 46.6715
1.156 2.4768%
Third Floor 47.8275
-1.9415 4.0593%
Fourth Floor 45.886

c) Corner beam

Floor Bending Moment Difference Percentage Increase

Ground 79.2788
6.1553 7.76415
First Floor 85.4341
-5.1406 6.01705
Second Floor 80.2935
-11.4003 14.1982%
Third Floor 68.8932
-13.7066 19.8954%
Fourth Floor 55.1866

After calculating the percentage difference from the above tables, We can interpret that the
variation does not exceed 10% and hence the analysis is safe.

33
Chapter 6 : Result and discussion
The structure was analysed as standard moment opposing construction in ETABS 2018
Software. Joint coordinate command is utilized to produce the coordinates and to indicate the
joints of the structure by starting the particulars/specifications of the plan. Member incidence
command is utilized to indicate the connectivity between joints. The columns and beams are
demonstrated utilizing beam elements. Member properties must be determined for every
member. From the analysis, maximum design loads, moments and shear on every member
was obtained. From these quantities, we design the main structure and further construction is
carried out.
Furthermore, after analysing the structure, we get the accompanying outcomes.
The shear power acting in the corner radiates is most extreme from the outset floor for example
102.7 KN and that of the corner sections is at the fourth floor for example 34.29 KN.
The shear power acting in the middle shafts is greatest at the main floor for example 104.71 KN
and that of focus sections is at the fourth floor for example 28.17 KN.
The shear power acting in fringe radiates is most extreme at the fourth floor for example 73.38
KN and that of the fringe segments is at fourth floor for example 23.79 KN.
The twisting second following up on corner radiates is greatest from the start floor for example
85.43 KN-m and that of the corner sections is greatest at fourth floor for example 48.12, KN-
m.
The twisting second following up on focus radiates is greatest from the start floor for example
86.09 KN-m and that on focus segments is greatest from the start floor for example 39.53 KN-
m.
The twisting second following up on fringe radiates is greatest from the start floor for example
86.09 KN-m and that of the fringe segments is greatest from the outset floor for example 36.16
KN-m.
The torsional power following up on corner radiates is greatest at fourth floor for example 0.334
KN and that of the corner segments is greatest from the start floor for example 0.594 KN.
The torsional power following up on focus radiates is greatest at ground floor for example 0.374
KN and that of the middle segments is greatest from the start floor for example 0.5908 KN.
The torsional power following up on fringe radiates is greatest at second floor for example 0.21
KN and that of the fringe segments is greatest from the start floor for example 0.597 KN.
By utilizing ETABS the investigation and configuration work can be finished inside specified
time. The task gives the certainty to complete undertaking of High-Rise structures or Multi
Story Building. By noticing consequences of plan data, we can embrace various sizes of part at
various members of the design. The given storey in the Residential Building are discovered safe
when design is analysis by utilizing ETABS Software.

34
Chapter 7: Applications of ETABS Software
Just structural engineer and architects utilize this software expertly. It's a three-dimensional
analysis and plan programming software.
For almost thirty years, ETABS has been recognized as the business standard for Building
Analysis and Design Software. Today, proceeding with the comparable practice, ETABS has
arisen into a strategically evolved structure analysis and design program.
The framework worked around an aesthetical article based graphical user interface. The plan is
controlled by desired, new unique yearning calculations for plan investigation and analysis.
With facilities for drafting just as delivering output, is reproducing standards of integration,
inventiveness, and specialized advancement.
Loads of things you can do utilizing ETABS programming including moment-resisting frames
and braced frames. It can likewise analyses any kind of support rooftop framework, structure
with beam size reduction or side plates. You can likewise plan inflexible floor framework or
adaptable floors, messy material design, incline section/slope just as parking framework
structure.
Aside from those the program can do intermediate level floor framework and several tower
structures, and various level diaphragm technique along with basic concrete structures. The
high-level composite floor framework or steel joist floor outlining strategy is simpler to examine
with this program.
ETABS offers a solitary user interface to perform modelling, analysis, design and reporting.
There is no restriction to the quantity of model windows, model control perspectives and
information view.

Figure(22) DirectX Graphics in ETABS

Enhanced DirectX Graphics
DirectX illustrations with equipped speed up designs take into considerate navigation of models
with fly-throughs and quick revolutions/rotations.

Multiple Views
Users can see moment diagrams, load task, deflected shapes, plan output and reports all in a
solitary screen.

35
 Figure(23) Multiple Views of the Plan
Quick Navigation and Data Management
The ETABS model explorer improves our capacity to oversee information in your model. One
can characterize, copy and alter properties in groups and drag-and-drop properties directly on
to the models for task. User characterized presentations can be set up effectively in the model
explorer for fast navigation.

Figure(24) Navigation of a High-Rise Building

Modeling
ETABS has a wide determination of formats for beginning another model rapidly. At this model
format stage, one can characterize matrix/grid and grid spacing, the quantity of stories, the
default structural framework sections, default slab and drop plan sections and uniform loads
(specifically dead and live loads).

36
 Figure(25) Data Input Windows
Physical Model
The physical model is comprised of objects that address the physical structural members.
Physical model perspectives precisely show insertion forces, member orientations, object
convergences, and other mathematical details caught by the object model.

Figure(26) Physical Model

Analytical Model
Analytical model perspectives show the limited component model of the design which is
comprised of the connectivity of the joints, frames, and shells and characterized meshing. At
the point when the analysis is run, the analytical model is auto-produced from the model and its
tasks and settings.

37
 Figure(27) Analytical Model
ETABS software has the following implications in the construction, designing, and
modelling industry:
1. It is a product utilized in developing structure. It examines and surveys seismic execution
and checks the load bearing limit of building structures.
2. Using this software, one can view and control the analytical model with incredible precision.
Plans and elevation views are auto-produced at each grid line.
3. ETABS programming is utilized for the analysis of concrete shear walls and concrete
moment frames. It is profoundly acclaimed for static and dynamic analysis of multi-story
frame and shear wall structures.
4. It is the most popular civil designing devices utilized in the structural industry and builds the
efficiency of underlying structural engineering specialists. It likewise forestalls the
speculation of unnecessary time and cash in broadly useful projects.
5. The input, output and numerical solution techniques of ETABS are especially intended to
take an advantage of the extraordinary physical and mathematical quantities related with
building type structures. Thus, this analysis and design tool speeds up data readiness, output
interpretation, and complete execution.

38
Chapter 8: Future Scope of Work
• ETABS is a crucial programming device that takes into account multi-story building
analysis and plan designing. ETABS is a 3D displaying programming for any sort of
structural analysis and plan designing. Utilizing this Program one can perform both steel
structure and RC Structure.
• ETABS gives users to Graphic information and change for smooth and fast model creation
for a construction which is very helpful for the engineers to directly get the knowledge of
the building whether the materials taken are proper or not. As the software gives the total
interpretation of the structure, the new advancement occurring in the software will be more
beneficial for the engineers, as it will save their time and energy used for the paper work of
the same.
• Creation of a 3D model including the use of plan perspectives and elevations, 3D model of
any sort of confounded design can be made effectively. Tower’s and skyscraper’s structure
will be designed thoroughly in this software which saves a lot of paper work which used to
done before this software was invented. There is also need to develop more custom
software’s like ETABS and models to test the structural adequacy of various complex
design with more accuracy.
• This software will lead the civil engineers to next dimensions of seeing through the object
much before it is constructed practically. It will give the idea of how the structure will
perform for various types of loadings and burdens applied/given on a particular part of the
whole structure. It will save engineers time and cost required to get a paper-based
knowledge/calculation which has lots of error, rather software like ETABS will do the
calculations effortlessly and efficiently.
• Future structural engineers need to learn software’s like ETABS in their initial stage of
learning about civil engineering to get expertise and professional in the structural field
which will help them to be a better engineer and will be advantageous for the betterment of
the engineers.

39
Chapter 9: Paper presentation details copy of certificate, award, etc.

40
Chapter 10: Plagiarism Report

41
Chapter 11: References
[1] Abhay Guleria. Structural Analysis of a Multi-Storied Building using ETABS for different
Plan Configurations, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT).
2014; 3(5):2278- 0181. ISSN: IJERTV3IS051552 www.ijert.org.
[2] Balaji UA. Mr. Selvarasan ME. B Design and analysis of multistoried building under static
and dynamic conditions using Etabs, International Journal of Technical Research and
Applications.
[3] Mahesh N, Patil Yogesh N. Sonawane, Seismic Analysis of Multistoried Building,
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT). 2015; 4(9).
[4] IS: Indian Standards Criteria for Earthquake Design of Structures, 1893-2002.
[5] IS. 456. Indian Standards (plain and reinforced concrete code of practice), (Fourth
Revision), 2000.
[6] Raghunandan MH and Suma (2015): Seismic Pounding between Adjacent RC Buildings
with and without Base Isolation System, International Journal of Research in Engineering
and Technology, Volume: 04 Issue: 06 | June-2015.
[7] Sukumar Behera, (2012): Seismic Analysis of Multi-storey Building with Floating Column,
National In of Technology Rourkela, May-2012.
[8] Hiten L. Kheni, Anuj K. Chandiwala(2014): Seismic Response of RC Building with Soft
Stories”, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume
10 Number 12 - Apr 2014
[9] Sagar R Padol, Rajashekhar S. Talikoti (2015): Review Paper on Seismic Responses of
Multi-story R.c.c Building with Mass Irregularity”, IJRET: International Journal of
Research in Engineering and Technology, Volume: 04 Issue: 03 | Mar-2015. •
[10] D. R. Panchal and P. M. Marathe (2011): Comparative Study of R.C.C, Steel and
Composite (G+30 Storey) Building”, Institute of Technology, Nirma University,
Ahmadabad, December, 2011.
[11] H. J. Shah and S. K. Jain, “Design Example of a Six Storey Building,” IITK-GSDMA.
[12] B. Umamaheshwara and P. Nagarajan, (August 2016) “Design Optimization and Analysis
of Shear Wall in High Rise Buildings Using ETABS,” International Journal for Research
in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 480-488.
[13] C. V. Lavanya, E. P. Pailey and M. Sabreen, (April 2017) “Analysis and design of g+4
residential building using ETABS,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 1845–1850.
[14] P.Agarwal, M.Shrinkhande, (2012) earthquake resistance design of structures, PHI
learning Pvt.
[15] Mr.N.B.Baraskar&Prof.U.R.Kawade (2015) :Structural Performance of RC Structural
wall system Over conventional Beam Column System in G+15 storey Building”,
International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science Volume 3, Issue 4,
July-August, 2015.
[16] Miss. Rupali A.Dhote, Asst. Prof. G. B. Bhaskar (2016): Design& Analysis of Soft Storey
Building due to wind & Earthquake”, International Journal for Technological Research in
Engineering Volume 3, Issue 9, May-2016.
[17] Pardeshi Sameer, Prof. N. G. Gore (2016), “Study of seismic analysis and design of multi
storey symmetrical and asymmetrical building “Volume: 03 Issue: 01.
[18] Ali Kadhim Sallal (2018) “Design and analysis ten storied building using ETABS
software-2016” Volume 4; Issue 2; May 2018; Page No. 21-27
[19] Pushkar Rathod, Rahul Chandrashekar,( Oct – 2017) “seismic analysis of multistoried
building for different plans using ETABS 2015” Volume: 04 Issue: 10

42
Annexure – I : PO, PSO Attainment
PO Attained
PO 1- Engineering knowledge: Projectee were able to apply the knowledge of mathematics,
science, engineering fundamentals, and an engineering specialization to the solution of
complex engineering problems.
PO 2- Problem analysis: Projectee were able to Identify, formulate, review research literature,
and analyze complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using
first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.
PO 3- Design/development of solutions: Projectee were able to design solutions for complex
engineering problems and design system components or processes that meet the
specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health and safety, and the
cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
PO 4- Conduct investigations of complex problems: Projectee were able to use research-
based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and
interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
PO 5- Modern tool usage: Projectee were able to create, select, and apply appropriate
techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and
modeling to complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
PO 6- The engineer and society: Projectee were able to apply reasoning informed by the
contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the
consequent responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO 7- Environment and sustainability: Projectee were able to understand the impact of the
professional engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and
demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO 8- Ethics: Projectee were able to apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics
and responsibilities and norms of the engineering practice.
PO 9- Individual and team work: Projectee were able to function effectively as an individual,
and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO 10- Communication: Projectee were able to communicate effectively on complex
engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as,
being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make
effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
PO 11- Project management and finance: Projectee were able to demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of the engineering and management principles and apply these to one’s
own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary
environments.
PO 12- Life-long learning: Projectee were able to recognize the need for and have the
preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest
context of technological change.

43
PSO Attained
PSO 1- Projectee were able to understand the concepts of Electronics & Communication
engineering and their applications in the field of semiconductor technology, consumer
electronics, embedded system, communication/ networking and other relevant areas.
PSO 2- Projectee have an ability to apply technical knowledge and usage of modern hardware
& software tools related to Electronics & Communication engineering for solving real
world problems.
PSO 3- Projectee have the capability to analyze, comprehend, design & develop electronic
subsystems/ systems for a variety of engineering applications and thus demonstrating
professional ethics & concern for societal well-being.

44
Annexure – II: Resume
Resume 1
ABHISHEK DHOMNE
Plot no.21 , dighori , Nagpur 440034 ·
Contact no. - 9075133024
Email id : abhishekdhomne22@gmail.com

Seeking for a challenging position as a Civil Engineer, where I can use my planning,
designing and overseeing skills in construction and help grow the company to achieve its
goal.

INTERNSHIP

23 MAY 2019 – 15 JUNE 2019

SHREE ASTAVINAYAKA ASSOCIATES
Er. J. K.Karanjekar
Studied for building layout, structural details, estimating also.

EDUCATION

MARCH 2015
SSC, SUYASH CONVENT NAGPUR
Passed with 87.40 percent.

FEBRUARY 2017
HSC, MAROTRAO MUDE HEMANTRAO JAKATE JR. COLLEGE
Passed with 55.85 percent.

SKILLS

• AutoCAD 3D • Active listener

• Revit • Team player
• High level of professionalism • Eye for detail
• Quick learner
• Good gamer

ACTIVITIES

Performed analysis and designing of G+4 residential building using ETABS software, which
gave technical knowledge and taught teamwork, leadership skills. Won gaming tournament
at college level.

45
HOBBIES

Driving, gaming, listening songs, reading.

PERSONAL INFO

Date of birth – 02 Feb 2000.

Languages known – English, Marathi, and Hindi.
Address - plot no. 21, Indra nagar, Narsala road, Dighori, Nagpur -440034
Contact no. – 9075133024
Email id – abhishekdhomne22@gmail.com

46
Resume 2

CHINMAY PADOLE

60,adarsh nagar ranala, kamptee chinmay11padole@gmail.com

+919595552902 https://www.linkedin.com/in/chinmay-
Padole- 397820136

Objective

To work in a challenging and dynamic environment and to keep adding

value to the organization that I represent and serve, while also
concurrently upgrading my skills and knowledge.

SKILLS
● Technical Skills
-Good knowledge of basic engineering design subjects

● Soft Skills
-Communication Skills: 1) Worked in the Marketing Team of Civil Engineering
Student Association

-Presentation Skills: Delivered an effective presentation on ‘Design and analysis of

residential building using Etabs software’ at a National level Competition

-Leadership Skills: 1) Served as a captain of college tug of war team

2) Served as an Event Management Head in various Cultural event at college level

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
-Two times winner of inter college tug of war team
-Was the Runner up at the Model Bridge Designing Competition

EDUCATION
• Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Aug 2017 – June 2021):7.39 CGPA
K.D.K College of Engineering, Nagpur

• 12th (MSBSHSE)(Julu-16): 58.31%

Vishwas Junior college Nandanvan, Nagpur

• 10th (MSBSHSE)(March-2013): 76.6%

S.J.C high school kamptee

47
Extracurricular Activities

• Worked as a Member of Civil Engineering Student Association

• Event head at various cultural and technical events at college
• Participates at various Sports, Cultural and Technical events at College lev

Project and Internship

• Project-
Topic-Design and Analysis of residential building using Etabs software
Project details -
• In this project we analyzed different residential buildings for different floors
starting from ground floor to G+4
• The analysis was done both manually and by using the ETABS software.
• The results were compared, and the difference was clearly seen.
• There are others software’s also that work o wind load, seismic load as ETABS
but ETABS is the best of them all as it provides very precise results.

• Internship-
Worked as intern at Nagpur Metro corporation
Internship details-
• Worked as an intern in Nagpur metro rail project (construction of 132 KV GIS S/S
building and transformers foundations) under the guidance of G.V. Enterprises
for 22 days.

Hobbies
• Working out, Riding bikes.

Personal Details
• Gender-Male
• Marital Status-Unmarried
• Permanent Address-Plot no.-:60, Adarsh nagar ranala, kamptee Nagpur
• Date of Birth- 15/06/1997
• Known Language-English, Marathi, Hindi

Declaration
- I hereby accept that the above information is true to best of my knowledge

Chinmay Padole
Nagpur, Maharashtra

48
Resume 3

Maheshwari S. Nagose

moni.nagose@gmail.com

Mobile no. 9552865478

Career Objective: Seeking a career that is challenging and interesting. A job that
gives me opportunities to learn, innovate and enhance my skills and strength in
conjunction with company goals.
Special Skills: 1) Certified in Revit by CADD Centre
2) Certified in AutoCAD by CADD Centre
3) Certified in Course on Computer Concept by Vision Info-tech
Qualification: 1) Pursuing Degree in Civil Engineering in KDK College of
Engineering, Nagpur
2) Diploma in Civil Engineering passed in 2017 with 79.21% in Govt.
Polytechnic, Gadchiroli
3) SSC Board 10th passed in 2014 with 71.40% in Twinkle Star
English School, Wadsa.

Interest: Listening to music and Reading books.

Strength: 1) Positive thinker

2) Honest
3) Always ready for challenges
Weakness: 1) Overthinking
2) Inability to say no
References: 1) Prof. S.S Bambole 2) Prof. V.Varghese
(Lecturer in Applied Mechanics Department) (Head of Civil
Engineering Department)

Sign:
Place: Wadsa
Date: 4/06/2021

49
Resume 4
PRATIK HANWATE
Address: At bhoaj Ward walmiki chauk bhadravati dist. Chandrapur Pin 442902 ·
Contact no. – 9834279461
Email id : hanwatepratik123@gmail.com

Looking for a challenging position as a Civil Engineer, where I can use my planning, designing skills in
construction and help grow the company to achieve its goal.

INTERNSHIP

23 MAY 2019 – 15 JUNE 2019

SHREE ASTAVINAYAKA ASSOCIATES
Er. J. K.Karanjekar
Studied for building layout, structural details, estimating.

EDUCATION

MARCH 2015
SSC, EKLAVYA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL RAMTEK
Passed with 8.4 CBS

2017
HSC, EKLAVYA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL RAMTEK NAGPUR
Passed with 64.5 percent.

SKILLS
• AutoCAD 3D • Active listener
• Revit • Team player
• High level of professionalism • Eye for detail
• Quick learner
• Good gamer

ACTIVITIES

Performed analysis and designing of G+4 residential building using ETABS software, which
gave technical knowledge and taught teamwork, leadership skills.
Won badminton tournament at college level.

HOBBIES

Carrom, badminton, listening songs, reading.

PERSONAL INFO

Date of birth – 13/07/1999.

Languages known – English, Marathi, and Hindi.
Address - At bhoaj Ward Valmiki chauk bhadravati dist. Chandrapur Pin 442902 ·
Contact no. – 9834279461

50
Resume 5

SAMIKSHA KISHOR BANSOD

+919284557069
Samisnehu1713@gmail.com
199,Eagle Palace, Untakhana Road, Medical Square,
Nagpur-440024

Career Objective
To work with an organization that would give me an opportunity for personal growth and
enhance my professional skills in the service industry.

Personal Details
Name :- Samiksha Kishor Bansod
D.O.B. :- 17/02/2000
Gender :- Female
Nationality :- INDIAN

Academic Qualification
1. Pursuing Graduation in Civil Engineering, K.D.K College of Engineering, Nandanvan,
Nagpur.
2. HSC Board 12th passed in 2017 with 67.85 % from St. Paul High School and Junior
College, Hudkeshwar, Nagpur.
3. SSC Board 10th passed in 2015 with 87.60% from R.S. Mundle English School, Wardha
Rd, Nagpur.

Special Sills
1. Certified in ETABS
2. Course of AUTOCAD

Experience of Project and Training

Project
Topic :- Analysis and Design of Multistorey Residential Building using ETABS Software.
Performed analysis and designing of G+4 residential building using ETABS software, which
gave technical knowledge and taught teamwork, leadership skills.
Internship
Worked as trainee for construction of non-industrial building for field training modules under
Harish Metangale (BE civil and MTech in structure ) Regd. govt. Contractor and Engineer.
Near Veterinary Hospital, Dhantoli, Katol.

Strength
1. Positive Thinker
2. Responsible
3. Good communication skills
4. Extrovert
Weakness
1. Stage fear
2. Overthinking
3. Inability to say no

51
Interests
1. Listening music
2. Dancing
3. Travelling

Honor
1. Joint Secretary of Women Development Cell (WDC)

Declaration
I hereby inform that the above mentioned information is correct to my knowledge and I bear
the responsibility for the content of the above particulars mentioned.

Samiksha K. Bansod
01/06/2021

52
53