Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRINDING-CHAR AJI59dCO12
GRINDING-CHAR AJI59dCO12
Journal of Food
Engineering 88 (2008) 499–506
Contents lists
available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Food
Engineering
b Centre for Food Technology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh 474 011,
India
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Keywords:
Apparent viscosity
Rice batter
# 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Rittinger’s constant
Wet grinding
1. Introduction
information in this area is confined to 1940–1960 and a few re-
wet grinding of cereals, the protein matrix holding the starch gran-
as Kick’s, Rittinger’s, and Bond’s laws, it has become possible to
tems for large scale operation owing to the steady increase in mar-
parative evaluation of its performance with domestic wet grinding
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 821 251 3910; fax: +91 821 251 7233.
namely, mixer grinder, stone grinder and colloid mill were evalu-
E-mail address: subbu@cftri.res.in (R. Subramanian).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.03.009
Nomenclature
CV coefficient of variation
K constant
(Bhattacharya and Swamy, 1967). Raw and parboiled rice were ob-
using a rice miller (M/s McGill mill, Houston, USA). Degree of pol-
generated to the energy consumed for generating that area. Math-
was purchased from M/s Loba Chemie Pvt Ltd., Mumbai, India.
od ¼ K ðdÞ ð1Þ
500 W, 18,000 RPM; M/s Chhaya Industries, India; (2) a stone grin-
d1
E ¼ K k ln ð2Þ
cheepuram, India; (3) a colloid mill (pilot scale unit) – vertical type
d1 d2
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
s sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
d2 d1
Switzerland.
get the desired consistency and particle size. Accordingly, rice (as
India) driven by Powermaster software.
ing) ratio was maintained as 1:1.10 and 1:1.75 (by weight), for raw
pressed as
and parboiled rice, respectively in all the systems. For every exper-
imental run, 500 g of rice was used in stone grinder and colloid
Input electrical energy ðkJÞ
E ¼ ð5Þ
the solid particles through the grinding zone in the form of free
successive sieving (Solanki et al., 2005) starting from large to small
did not show any significant rise during the grinding operation of
250, 180, 150, 105 and 63 lm openings, respectively. The weight
temperature).
the total sum of the fractions. The final average particle size was
----------------------- Page 3-----------------------
versus sieve size and selecting a notional sieve size, which allows
1976).
was taken as the reference particle size for assessing the perfor-
for milled products of wheat (flour and semolina), and was adopted
duration, finer was the particle size. Raw rice took 360 s to achieve
rice samples (Solanki et al., 2005). Freeze dried samples were used
quired a longer duration of 480 s to achieve similar reduction
damage values between the freeze dried and fresh samples were
of the slurry increased as the grinding progressed and this increase
analysis.
3.1.2. Mixer grinder
2.9. Viscosity
as that of stone grinder. However, mixer grinder took much shorter
Table 1
generally with spindle No. 3 and spindle No. 4 was used when
Description E d2 KK KR Wi
varying the spindle speed (10, 20, 50 and 100 RPM) while single
600 267.8 290 116.7 86,371 21.1
ments were carried out for whole batter of raw and parboiled rice
Mixer grinder
parboiled rice were prepared from their whole batter along with
CV of work indices 19.2 13.8 16.6
rice samples which did not require the suspending medium. The
Table 2
ð6Þ
CV of work indices 18.9 9.2 14.5
All the experimental runs were carried out in duplicate and the
Mixer grinder
values were within ±3%. The mean values are reported. In the case
120 155.0 900 133.2 202,883 33.3
ing laws.
1000
40
800
30
)
%
m
Reference particle (
μ
e
( 600
e
a
i
20 m
s
a
e
d
c 400
h
i
c
r
r
a
a
P
t
10 S
200
0
0
Grinding time
(s)
Fig. 1. Influence of grinding time on average particle size and starch damage in
batch grinders. stone grinder – raw rice (particle size); mixer grinder –
raw rice (particle size); stone grinder – parboiled rice (particle size);
mixer grinder – parboiled rice (particle size); stone grinder – raw rice
(starch damage).
pression and less of shear) and probably the higher speed of the
ing. However, Rittinger’s law showed better suitability than the
mixer grinder and the loading ratio (actual load to the rated load)
other two, followed by Bond’s law. The variations among the coef-
setting while parboiled rice did not pose such a problem owing
there is a scope to develop a unified model for wet grinding of
while grinding raw rice. The results revealed that raw rice could be
grinder (160.6 kJ/kg) was nearly double compared to the mixer
(730 lm). Besides, raw rice took lesser duration (21 s) compared
In the case of parboiled rice, there was not much difference in spe-
water required for grinding with ice. There was not much differ-
ting in the grinding chamber having a consequential effect on the
ence in the extent of size reduction (495 and 520 lm, respectively)
size reduction. The specific energy consumption increased by
ticed that water addition assisted the flow in the system in a better
medium owing to the fact that the flow of batter within the system
adjusting the gap in the grinding chamber and the temperature rise
Parboiled rice
All the three classical laws proposed for dry grinding gave
Stone grinder 480 221.0 625 144.7 176,440 32.7 30.6
in all the three systems (Tables 1–3). The specific energy consump-
alone. Probably, the highest starch damage in raw as well as par-
tion for grinding parboiled rice increased by #1.38, 2.94 and 2.21
boiled rice obtained in the stone grinder could be the reason for
fold compared to raw rice in stone grinder, mixer grinder and col-
its preference for the preparation of idli and dosa.
case of raw rice and black gram; however, it was lower in the case
rice (Figs. 2 and 3). In the case of raw rice, the starch granules ap-
raw rice batter, the starch damage was lower in the range of 2.6–
at a lower resolution (Fig. 2) and the protein-starch matrices were
the range of 22.6–30.6% (Table 3). These starch damage values ob-
boiled rice, the semi-crystalline nature of starch granules was lar-
an artifact since it may not be only due to grinding effect but also
The presence of fibrous material in all the samples examined at
er than the minimum value (6.6%) reported for dry grinding of par-
wall materials (Fig. 3). The micrographs of batter prepared from
boiled rice (Solanki et al., 2005) and any further increase observed
different wet grinding systems indicated the effects of forces in-
could be reasonably attributed to the effect of wet grinding. Earlier,
volved (Fig. 3). In the case of stone ground batter, larger disruption
greater was the starch damage in both raw as well as parboiled rice
3.5. Viscosity
ious size fractions obtained after sieving revealed that finer the
Viscosity of batter during wet grinding has an influence on the
particle size the greater was the starch damage both in dry and
power required for the movement/circulation of batter within the
mill for both raw as well as parboiled rice under standardized con-
snack food preparation such as fermentation, mixing and spread-
ditions (Fig. 1 and Table 3). These results indicated the probable
ing as well as cooking. The apparent viscosity of wet ground raw
role of the type of forces involved in the individual wet grinding
and parboiled rice batter obtained from different wet grinding sys-
was higher at all concentrations than raw rice and the difference in
ment with our earlier study carried out with raw and parboiled
1000
800
P 600
m
c 400
200
0 5 10 15
20 25 30
Concentration (%)
stone grinder – raw rice; mixer grinder – raw rice; colloid mill –
raw rice; stone grinder – parboiled rice; mixer grinder –
tions (Jagtap et al., 2008 ). Although the average particle size was is also
known as non-Newtonian pseudoplastic behaviour. The par-
closer to the reference particle size in all the batters used in this ticle
size of flour strongly influenced the viscosity, probably the
study, the actual viscosity values varied with various wet grinding finer
flours, due to their greater surface area per unit weight,
systems (Fig. 4). This suggested the type of forces involved in a par- underwent
easier and greater swelling in water compared to coar-
ticular grinding system as well as the temperature rise experienced ser flours
and hence showed greater viscosity (Sandhya Rani and
understanding.
acterization. The minus 100 mesh fraction (#150 lm) of parboiled
ity measurements were made at various shear rates (10, 20, 50 and (Fig. 6)
as that of the whole batter. But the viscosity values were
100 RPM). The whole batter of raw as well as parboiled rice pre- much
higher than the corresponding whole batter of parboiled rice
2000
1600
P 1200
(
y
c 800
400
0 20 40 60
80 100
Spindle speed
(RPM)
Fig. 5. Pseudoplastic behaviour of raw and parboiled rice batter (mixer grinder).
raw rice – concentration 10%; raw rice – concentration 20%;
3000
s
a
P 2000
1000
0 20 40
60 80 100
Spindle
speed (RPM)
American Association of Cereal Chemists. tenth ed. Methods: 76-30A and 80-60.
Chakkaravarthi, A., Math, R.G., Walde, S.G., Rao, D.G., 1993. Grinding
characteristics
involved in other grinders. All the three laws proposed for dry grind-
N., Subrahamanyan, V., 1960. Studies on idli fermentation: part I – some
the other two especially for parboiled rice and mixer grinder. The
285.
Fellows, P.J., 2000. Food Processing Technology – Principles and Practice. Woodhead
Kent, N.L., Evers, A.D., 1994. Technology of Cereals, fourth ed. BPC Wheatons,
Exeter.
Solanki, S.N., Subramainan, R., Singh, Vasudeva, Ali, S.Z., Manohar, B., 2005.
Scope of