Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bhasin & Biberstein.1968. Adjuvants Fowl Cholera
Bhasin & Biberstein.1968. Adjuvants Fowl Cholera
Bhasin & Biberstein.1968. Adjuvants Fowl Cholera
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Association of Avian Pathologists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Avian Diseases.
http://www.jstor.org
INTRODUCTION
Ever since the production of the classical attenuated fowl
cholera vaccine by Pasteur, many attempts have been made to
prevent outbreaks of fowl cholera in chickens. His method could
not be duplicated successfully, however, and a search for a more
dependable method in controlling the disease effectively has been
conducted since the early 1920's. The effectiveness of earlier
aqueous avirulent vaccines (7) and bacterins (13) has always been
variable (8,19,9,10).
Carter (2) compared the immune response in mice to bac-
terins made from broth cultures and chicken embryo vaccines made
from Pasteurella multocida, type A. Chicken embryo vaccine was
much superior to broth-derived bacterin in immunizing value.
Bierer et al. (1) described a phenol-killed autogenous bacterin
which afforded some protection to turkeys in an infected flock.
The challenge, however, was carried out within 20 days of vac-
cination.
The introduction of adjuvants has considerably improved the
efficacy of killed bacterins, although the side effects of these are
not very well understood (5). Freund (6), while reviewing the lit-
erature on adjuvants, emphasized the effectiveness of light mineral
oil in water-in-oil emulsions for the stimulation of a high degree
of immunity and prolonged antibody response to bacterins.
Heddleston and Reisinger (10) first showed that a single dose
of a bacterin consisting of a water-in-oil emulsion of formalinized
P. multocida was capable of producing a high degree of immunity
against fowl cholera in chickens for at least 9 months. Alum-pre-
cipitated vaccine, chick embryo vaccine, and other commercially
159
second pen. The birds were inoculated with 0.5 ml of the respective
bacterin subcutaneously in the side of the neck. Group 5, contain-
ing 30 birds, served as an unvaccinated control and was allowed
to mix in both the pens with the vaccinated birds.
Challenge inoculum. Bacteria for challenging were prepared by
transferring an 18-hour-old smooth iridescent colony from YPC
agar plate to 100 ml of brain heart infusion broth. After eight
hours of incubation the cell suspension was standardized to contain
approximately 2.7 X 10'9cells per ml.
Challenge. The immunity of the birds was challenged 4, 8, 12,
and 16 weeks after vaccination. Twenty birds from each vaccinat-
ed group and five unvaccinated controls were selected randomly
and transferred to an aseptic unit in the specific pathogen-free
laboratory. The birds were challenged by swabbing the nasal cleft
with a cotton swab saturated with the challenge inoculum. All
birds were observed for 7 days and the survivors then killed. Swabs
from the nasal cleft, trachea, and liver were cultivated on blood
agar for Pasteurella organisms. Any dead or visibly sick birds were
also cultured. Birds showing paralytic symptoms were sacrificed
on the seventh day, and the brain also was cultured.
Serology. On the day of challenge 5 ml of blood was taken from
the large brachial vein of each vaccinated and control bird. The
serum obtained was either tested within 24 hr of collection or
stored in the frozen state for later testing. All serum samples were
tested for HA antibodies. The technique of the HA test was similar
to that described by Carter (3).
Passive immunity tests. Four serum batches having HA titers
of 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, and 1:512 were used in the mouse protec-
tion test (18). Each batch consisted of ten samples. Four mice
were injected subcutaneously with 0.2 ml of a serum sample and
after 24 hr were inoculated with 0.1 ml of a 10-5 dilution of an 8-hr
broth culture. An equal number of controls (unprotected) were
similarly inoculated with the challenge inoculum. Mice were ob-
served for 3 days after challenge.
RESULTS
The bacterins used were tolerated well by the vaccinated birds.
Six birds were lost prior to challenge, from causes unrelated to
Pasteurella infection. One of the birds was paralyzed, and the oth-
ers were killed because of broken wings or legs.
All bacterins used conferred significant degrees of immunity
I 20 3B 6 7 4 20 4 7 9 - 20 7 3 9 1 10 3 7 - -
II 20 1 5 8 6 20 4 4 7 3 ) 2 1 7 9 10 1 6 3-
III 20 5 11 4 - 20 3 10 7 - 20 1 9 8 7 - 3 2 -
IV 20 3 5 6 6 20 2 8 6 4 20 4 3 5 8 11 25 4 -
NASAL CLEFT
70
70-
60-
i1 ill
30-
20-
5-
WEEKS. 4 12 4812 481216 481216
8 16 8 16 8 16 8 16
60-'-
TRACHEA
45- -
30- _
15-
,. rvo .. . .. .
.....i I II
W ttC
r.i
481z6 4812 6 48 126 481216
WEEKS- 4 2
8 16 8 16 8 16 '8-16
BACT.I BACT.
I BACT.I BACT.11
Fig. 1. Recovery of P. multocida from immunized birds after challenge
Weeks - time interval between immunization and challenge.