Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drafting of A Will
Drafting of A Will
Succession:
Testate – with a will
Intestate – without a will or an invalid will (not accepted by the master)
• The Wills Act 7 of 1953 (8The Wills Act), as amended, prescribed the requirements or formalities
for a valid will.
o This act applies where such a will was executed on or after 1 January 1954
• The Law of Succession Amendment Act 43 of 1992 (The Amending Act)
o This act mad considerable changes to the law applicable to the execution of wills
o This act applies where such a will executed on or after 1 January 1954 and the testator dies
on or after 1 Octobers 1992
Example:
o If a testator died before 1 October 1992: The Wills Act 7 of 1953 (as it existed prior to the coming
into operation of the Amending Act) would apply.
o However, if a testator died on or after 1 October 1992: Then the formalities of the Wills Act as
amended by the 8Amending Act 43 of 19929 would apply.
The date of death is therefore important as it will determine which act would apply.
Formalities/Requirements:
✓ In writing – hand written or typed out
✓ Signed at the end and on every page – as close as possible to the last words to prevent fraudulent
activities (Kidwell v Masters 1983)
✓ Testators signature must be made by them in presences of two or more competent witnesses (14
or older) at the same time
o May sign with a mark – ONLY testator, but if this happens it must be done in the presence of
a commissioner of oaths who must sign each page (if not, it will be invalid) except for the
page where their certificate will appear.
o A commissioner of oaths cannot also be a witness
o Testator’s signature must appear at the end of the will and on each page
o Jeffrey v Masters 1990 – court rejected a will because a person was a practicing attorney and
not a commissioner of oaths as they identified themselves as
✓ Witnesses must attest and sign in presence of testator and each other, preferable to sign each
page and can appear anywhere.
o To be a competent witness, you must be 14 years or older as they must be competent
to give evidence in court if it came to that
✓ Need to be over the age of 16 – age determines the capacity to make a will, status does not
matter
✓ Best to date a will, especially in the case where there is more than one will
Competency:
A competent witness
o 14 years or older
o Must be competent to give evidence in court (Must be of a mature age)
The right to make a will is determined by the age of the individuals, and is not affected by:
o Emancipation
o Marriage
o Qualification
o financial status etc.
The Act states that there is no requirement for the Will to be dated.
o However, for practical reason, it is important in order to determine the last will of the
deceased. (remember this for the test)
S2 (3 ) of Wills Act 7 of 1 9 5 3 :
This is also known as the rescue provision.
Even with all these requirements and formalities that must be met for a valid Will, there exists this
section which permits the HIGH COURT to order the Master to accept a document which has been
drafted or executed, but which does not comply with all the formalities of a valid Will, to accept the Will
as the last Will of a testator. NOTE!! Person lodging the document must make application to the HC,
and the HC will then order the Master to accept the document as the Will of the testator. Depends on
the formalities not met.
These formalities prescribed by s2 of the Wills Act are still part of our law. Compliance with these
formalities remains the only way for a testator to make that will, however, in certain instance, the HC
can tell the Master to accept a Will where certain formalities where not met.
Non-compliance however requires the intervention of the HC, as per s2(3) rescue provision
This permits the High Court to accept a document that does not comply with all the formalities as a will
– they direct the master to accept it as a will. This is an intervention by the High Court.
The more requirements that are not met, the less probable it is to be accepted.
An intention or instruction to draft/amend a will does not form part of s2(3), it needs to be a document
– Bennett v Master the court decided that a document with the heading to instruct to draft a will was not
valid as there was no will or document.
It must be noted that an instruction to amend or draft a Will, as well as a document which is merely
intended to convey information about what the testator wished to have included in his Will, that do not
comply with requirements of this S2(3)- i.e., does not fall under the scope of this section.
So, if it was merely just an instruction before the person passed away, or something that they wanted to
include in their Will, but then the person passed away, in those instances, that does not comply with the
requirements of s2(3).
The court will only accept when it is a document in front of the Court which was drafted or executed by
the deceased, and the person has since died, and the person intended that document to be his last will.
Not to make changes or a simple instruction.
So, in the case of instructions, the maker intends that another document will be drafted, and in this
instance, it is not the case. Here, the document was already drafted and now we’re trying to rescue it
Bennette v The Master of the Supreme Court and Another 1995. In this case, a document with the
heading, ‘Request to draft a Will’ was in contention. The court held that that was clearly an intention to
draft a Will. In that instance it could not be rescued under s2(3). Must, be a document, drafted by a
testator, intended to be his or her Will. The Court: Must be satisfied that there is a document which was
drafted or executed by the deceased, who has since died and who intended that document to be his
Will. In that instance the court will look if that document can be rescued where it did not meet all the
formalities and requirements for a valid Will.
T estamentar y T r ust:
These are created by a will that includes a trust deed that comes into existence after death. This acts as
a manual that outlines who the parties are and what should be done.
This is also known as a mortis causa trust.
This is helpful when a testator wishes to regulate administration of inheritance after their death and to
avoid the inheritance from going into the guardian’s fund. It protects the funds of the minor. This is
provided for in section 43(2) of the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965.
Only the trustee has access to the fund to care for the beneficiary in the absence of the testator – the
duties and powers will be in the will.
Trusts are governed by the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988.
The trust acts as a way to avoid that the minor’s portion is being paid into the guardian’s fund.
When the beneficiary needs to get the control over the fuds, a letter of authority is needed from the
master.
S92 of Act 66 of 1965 states that all moneys that have not been claimed for 30 years shall be forfeited
to the state.
Trustee will have access to the Trust funds to care for the beneficiary/ies in the absence of the testator,
that is at times where the beneficiary requires assistance through immaturity, disability, or incapacity.
The powers and the duties of the trustee must be contained in the Will. The trustee cannot just do
whatever he or she feels like. Powers and duties will be stipulated and must be contained in the Will as
to how the trustee must divulge of the funds.
Trustees are not permitted to act, until the Master grants the nominated trustee letters of authority to do
so/to act
F actor s to consider when dr afting a will:
Testator often nominates a family member as executor of the estate. They do have total freedom to
appoint anyone as executor or co-executor – this can be an attorney, accountant, etc. It is advisable to
nominate another person in case something was to happen such as the person passing or rejecting the
role.
Legacies:
The bequest of specific property (movable or immovable) to a specific person, trust or charity. When the
estate is distributed, the legacies will be paid first before any of the heirs get paid.
The person receiving this becomes the legatee(s).
The legatee gets paid first before the heirs get their bit.
Heir s:
They will succeed the residue of the estate.
E.g., “I bequeath the residue of my estate to my wife, Janet Jay, and failing her, to my children born of
the marriage by representation per stirpes”
It is from the heirs share that the expenses are paid.
E.g., Fideicommissum:
“I bequeath my estate to “a” subject to the condition that on “a’s” death my estate will devolve to “ b”.
Usufruct:
“I bequeath my estate to the children born of my marriage, subject to a life usufruct over my estate to
my wife, carol jay.”
A fideicommissum is a type of bequest in which the beneficiary is encumbered to convey parts of the
decedent's estate to someone else. For example, if a father leaves the family house to his firstborn, on
condition that they will bequeath it to their first child.
Usufructuary heir can stay for as long as they wish to.
A Usufruct is a legal institution in which someone, who is not the owner, is given the right to use and
enjoy the profits and advantages of something belonging to another as long as the property is not
damaged or altered in any way, for a certain period of time.
Witnesses:
A witness must be older than 14. They will not be disqualified from receiving any benefit from a will if it
has been attested to and signed by at least 2 other competent witnesses who are not named. If there
are not two others, the witness can be disqualified from receiving anything from the will. They need two
external people to witness in order to enjoy their share.
In this instance, there will be three witness signatures.
Secur ity:
Every executor must provide security to the satisfactory to the master for the proper performance of his
functions.
It is there to be able to recover. The reason for this is that, if any default is made by the executor in the
proper performance of his duties, which results in the estate suffering any loss then the master may
enforce the security and recovery from the executor and his sureties the loss to the estate.
An exception is that the testator indemnifies the executor and the master can also suspend the
obligation (when it is their spouse, partner, or child)
To ensure the estate will not suffer any losses.
E.g., 1. “The master of the high court is directed to dispense with the necessity of my executor
furnishing security for the administration of my estate.”
2. “I nominate my brother, carl smith, as executor of my will and I direct that he be exempted from
having to find security for the due fulfilment of his duties as such.”
Revocation – the later will by implication revokes all previous wills – all previous wills can still count,
and can be problematic
Codicil – a schedule or annexure to an existing will that is made to add or change an existing will. This
does not need to be signed by the same witnesses who signed the will.
Beneficiaries – bequeath to different parties (have a heading; beneficiaries, legacies, heirs – but this is
not needed). This is when you bequeath to different parties.
The validity of a will does not invalidate when there is a clause not included.
EXAMPLE:
Joan smith approaches you and requires you to draft a will for her, with the following conditions:
- I nominate my daughter Jacky smith to be my executrix
- I direct that she shall not need to pay any security for the fulfilment of her duties as executrix
- I want to leave the sum of r10 000.00 to my grandson – Joshua smith
- I want to leave the sum of r10 000.00 to my grandson Rhys smith
- I want my daughter, Jacky smith, to inherit the immovable property which is situate at no 3
Mimosa Avenue, Bellville.
- I want my sister, dawn may, to inherit the residue of my estate.
- I do not want any of the benefits to form part of the marriage regime should my beneficiaries
marry or be married.
(Supplement your answer with the necessary information)
Massing occurs when two or more persons with testamentary capacity, combine or consolidate their
separate estate into one estate. This gives directions on what must be done with the estate on the
occurrence of a specific event. Two or more persons combine their separate estate into a single estate,
and they will prescribe what must be done at occurrence of specific event which is usually the death of
one of the spouses.
Therefore, if a joint will provide for a consolidation of some or all of the property of both testators into
one unit for the purposes of a joint disposition to a third party upon the death of the first dying OR
upon the death of the survivor and also conferred a benefit out of the property of the first dying upon
the survivor, then if the survivor adiates it is said that a massing as occurred.
Adiation or r epudiation:
Adiation is the acceptance of a benefit under a will. If you adiate, you receive the benefit that has been
bequeathed. They accept all the conditions that is attached to the benefit and must adhere to the
conditions.
Repudiation is the rejection of the benefits under a will. They forfeit all benefits as the beneficiary under
the will but retains their own property (husband and wife make joint will, surviving spouse will inherent
the deceased estate and upon surviving spouse death it will go to the children, one has passed but the
husband repudiates, this means he no longer benefits from the deceased’s half, they will retain their
own share and the estate will be done with in terms of the wishes of the deceased – given to children)
Per capita means a distribution in equal shares among the persons entitled to take
Per capita means that all living members of the beneficiary group receive an equal share. If a
beneficiary dies before you, the deceased beneficiary's share is returned to the estate and distributed
evenly among the surviving beneficiaries.
Surviving spouse – maintenance of surviving spouse act 27 of 1990 – you have a claim of deceased
spouse for maintenance from 1 July 1990 onwards. Kept in mind that all maintenance requirements
need to be met (same regulations).
Factors they take into account – the amount in the deceased’s estate available after paying creditors
and admin fees, the existing and expected means, earning capacity, financial obligations, the
subsistence of the marriage (time), standard of living of survivor during marriage, the age of the
survivor at the date of death.
Notes on DRAFTING A WILL!!!
• HEADING
• Cover page [information is exactly the same as when you start your Will] see example of Sally White
bellow.
• REVOCATION CLAUSE. [very important because you revoke all previous Wills if you are drafting a
new Will]
• ‘I hereby revoke all previous wills and testamentary dispositions made by me.’
• Note!!! If it is a more than one page Will, then please ensure that there is space on each page of the
Will for the witnesses and the testator/testatrix to sign.
• SECURITY CLAUSE
• ‘I expressly direct that my executor/executrix is exempted from any obligation to furnish
security to the Master of the High Court for the due and proper fulfilment of his duties’
• Beneficiaries [don’t have to put legacies and heirs separately, can put them all under one another,
but see what scenario expects from you]
• See will example bellow!!!
• Importantly: ‘The residue of my estate to my daughter… Note!! Base this upon testators
wishes.
• ‘All monies in the bank must…’
• Note to cover all the testators’ assets
COMMISSIONER OF OATHS
• NOTE!!! Commissioner of oaths certificate will only be attached to a Will where the testator/testatrix
sign by using a mark or by another person, with the consent or direction of the testator/testatrix and in
the presence of the testator/testatrix. [NB!!!]
• Where another person signs on behalf of the testator/testatrix with the consent or direction of the
testator/testatrix, and in the presence of the testator/testatrix, then that person’s name appear in the
brackets. E.G signature line………………………. (testatrix) [Peter Nali, acting with the direction/consent
of the testator/testatrix, signs on behalf of Sally White the testatrix]
• Note!! The attorney who is assisting you to draft a will cannot also be the commissioner of oaths,
even though that attorney is also regarded as a commissioner of oaths. The drafting attorney only
assists in drafting the Will. He must then send the testator/testatrix to another attorney in order for that
attorney to sigh as commissioner of oaths. That attorney or colleague will then commission the
certificate.
I, Mrs. Joan Smith, with ID number, 9607086315088, a single female (divorced), residing at No 3
Mimosa Avenue, Bellville, declare this to be my last Will and testament.
1. Revocation
I hereby revoke any and all previous Wills, testamentary dispositions, and codicils made by me.
2. Appointment of Executrix
I nominate my daughter, Jacky Smith, with ID number, 9708086721088, residing at No 3 Mimosa
Avenue, Bellville, as executrix of my Will.
3. Security
I direct that my daughter, Jacky Smith, with ID number 9708086721088, residing at No 3 Mimosa
Avenue, Bellville, be exempted from having to find security for the due fulfilment of her duties as
executrix.
As Witnesses:
First witness Second witness Testatrix
Name: Name: Signature:
Signature: Signature: Mrs. Joan Smith
4. Beneficiaries
I bequeath the following legacies:
4.1 The sum of ten thousand rands (R10 000) to my grandson, Joshua Smith, with ID number
0308170845088, residing at No 3 Mimosa Avenue, Bellville.
4.2 The sum of ten thousand rands (R10 000) to my grandson, Rhys Smith, with ID number
0503236924088, residing at No 3 Mimosa Avenue, Bellville.
4.3 Immovable property, situated at No 3 Mimosa Avenue, Bellville to my grandson, Daniel Hart, with
ID number 0101106212088, residing at No 3 Mimosa Avenue, Bellville.
Drafted on:
Dated:
Signed by the above-named Mrs. Joan Smith as and for her last Will in our presence and then by us in
hers.
(next page)
I, the undersigned,
Sally White
A single female (divorced)
[Identity number:3706060471084]
Residing at No. 4 Green Street, Parow, Western Cape Province
2. NOMINATION OF EXECUTOR
I hereby nominate my son, A (ID. Number:) to be the Executor of my estate. In the event A is unable to
fulfill his duties as Executor, I nominate B (ID. Number:.), to be the Executor of my Will.
AS WITNESSES:
1 __________________ _______________________
TESTATRIX
[SALLY WHITE]
2 __________________
(next page)
3. SECURITY
I expressly direct that my Executor is exempted from any obligation to furnish security to the Master of
the High Court for the due and proper fulfilment of his duties.
4. BENEFICIARIES
4.1 I bequeath my immovable property situate at No. 4 Green Street, Parow, To my daughter, B (ID
NUMBER: ……….)
4.2 I bequeath me that my other immovable property situated at No. ………………. To my son, A) ID
NUMBER: ……………)
4.3 I bequeath my motor vehicle, being a BMW to my youngest son, C (ID NUMBER: …….)
4.4 I bequeath the residue of my estate to my other daughter, D (ID NUMBER: ….)
4.5 All monies held in my Absa bank account must be divided equally between my two grandchildren,
namely;
(next page)
THUS, DONE AND SIGNED AT BELLVILLE on this the 4TH day of JULY 2021, in the presence of the
undersigned witnesses, all being present at the same time and each seeing the other sign.
The witnesses further confirm the testatrix signed first.
AS WITNESSES:
1 __________________ ________________________
TESTATRIX
[SALLY WHITE]
2 __________________
COMMISSIONER OF OAT HS CERT IF ICAT E
I, RAYMOND VAN WYK of THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE, LAW CLINIC, ROBERT
SOBUKWE ROAD, BELLVILLE, in my capacity as commissioner of oaths certify that I have satisfied
myself as to the Identity of the Testatrix, SALLY WHITE (I.D. 3706060471084) and confirm that the Will
so signed is the Will of the Testatrix.
SIGNATURE: _____________________________
(Commissioner of oaths)
AS WITNESSES
1. _________________________ ________________________
TESTATRIX
[SALLY WHITE]
2. _________________________