Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Verified Comments
Verified Comments
- versus -
1. That respondent was first hired by the accused Cirilo Macapal Jr.
y Dayon and his wife Ma. Cecilia Macapal in Criminal Case No.
14-39311, 14-39312 and 14-39313 for violations of Sections 5, 15
and 11, respectively, Article ll of Republic Act No. 9165, which
cases accused Macapal were arraigned and assisted by
respondent on August 5, 2014, copy of the Order dated August 5,
2014 issued by the Regional Trial Court, Branch 47, Bacolod City,
hereto attached as AnneX "1", which forms part hereof;
I
\--/
8. The said motions for extension to file the Appellants Brief were
made because the accused and his wife failed to submit to the
respondent's office the required records of this case or at least
copy of Transcript of Stenographic Notes taken from the
prosecution witness, Police officer Grijaldo despite several
demands and warnings that our appeal will be dismissed since
they could not properly prepare, file and submit the Appellant's
Brief without the said records of the case or Transcript of
Stenographic Notes;
9. That respondent could not just assume facts testified by the said
witness in open court, hence, the necessity of the Transcript of
Stenographic Notes;
the Regional Trial Court, Branch 53, Bacolod City and if no copy
thereof to go to the Court of Appeals, Cebu City, which she agreed
to me;
13. Mr. Art Yong told respondent that he will try the Office of the
City Prosecutor, Bacolod City, if it had still a copy of the testimony
of Grijaldo but after several days he informed the respondent that
they too have not copy in there office;
[.
J
18. Respondent's failure to file his Appellant's Brief was due to the
circumstance beyond his control, hence, if there is negligence is
only excusable. The same was not tainted with malice and that it
is not deliberate. Respondent, after the dismissal of his appeal in
this case, even continued to handle cases of the accused pending
before RTC, Branch 47, Bacolod City, which means that the latter
has still the trust and confidence which he bestowed to the former.
TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCES
PRAYER
Herein respondent further prays for such other relief and remedies
equitable under the premises.
(
I
Bacolod City, Philippines, January 9, 2023.
1
Rm. 2 , TG Building,
Gatuslao Street, Bacolod City
PTR#8987740-02115122
rBP# 138534 -0114122
Roll No. 33660/p.232
MCLE No. Vll - 0013316 -3124122
Attv.Asu i lar. Law.Offi ce@Gmai l. Com
09074005092
VERIFICATION and
CERTIFICATION OF NON.FORUM SHOPPING
Doc. No.
Page No.
Book No. \
Series of 2023 VA, r'"'
f:
F,,
l.
Copy Furnished: U
"-',irl tiLDG
4,.
CP I ru. u; -. o "+ ,5 rr4Z5
Court of Appeals
Pablo U. Abella Street
Labangon, 6000 Cebu City
t gth oivision
?'
-" u '.,.. J
x r. y ru{fr,tl lt
x.. ":::::lo.., Y
$nsgR
When thesr, ra(,fs !'!.fi:lr,t raitacl for the arraignm+"nt of th*
accr-*ed. accu*rci Macapai 1i:{i i:1t ccufts€:i appear'*d" T"his
pres'iiliirq judge inqulred "!'i-CIri -ii;.-iiied afirj cui;iil*{ v"''liu'the;" they'
i'''*un arty',',h;ra[:'r,'l 1g'1 l'"" h''
-tttr-'t thel'r' {'p('1t aqlitEt fr{Cl-rsed
tndbtrrur-ii di :,,',e iu: ii;i"rd,.:''i .i CElf tr:einil him hretcre kTC
Sraricii i'li. ljoi;; ;lfi:,'*'-j 'i{' ,,:t::ei:t!:":
i +t lrr; J;il.ti rti "'" t- j ,'i1t.,," ht.. . i-trr|'ed t:'114 th,o roCOrClS Of
iir*:r Ld5e5.
{ .} rl."
*rt:i I i,.t ,,f,' : I.' i , A t-,, r ;,.r irrr4 at S" lli n'r:lo,il. in tttg
11)Ol'lrir'l(.
SO OR NFRFTJ.
ORDER
SO ORDERED.
tjmv
roilffi?'
pfiftr]tu $tr'rH[ pl-llt tPpiN{:s
tifiGlCIt*lAl'l'tr{.l AL {:ot lR'I"
rrih Jl.u!lctal Regioli
F;r,fl fi(h Sl"micotod (itY
"*{}ttr"
i,
,:;l
for I
f,lle *ccuse<.! was ncrt in t:ourt for the hearing. HJ
rvas ciuty
rrquifierl. D*,pite the warning ile iart".o to ippiur iirrr prer..,.t
rvideru:e for th* erccr.mcx.l. Thus the pr-os#uticR rRove,ii
to
sUbnllt lhu r:ose-r fcrr rm*lufiCIrr. The c*m"t grant*fl t.he
tfio6{)g.
&t5c.u sstCIN
1'lrr: etemertt$ nec{-"$$ary, 1*r a pros$critiqrt r'cr vioLaHon
rif S+:*tion 5, RA gi65 or sate hf dangerous rJrugs ar-e;
{,Il ffue
l#entrty of tfte fuu5rsy an$ r{1e seller. ffie ohjec and the t
ruRxleler*fl*n; $n*J dJi rfre, delivery of fh* ffting soid onrl
flre
pclyryl€fif. {Pectrt|e y. l-.?v{o, S.R" Aio, f {t^?J5,
6 Jufy ?0r?. 6Ss
'<nm. L?se l'/o. O?-2,1lgs
{.tedsion-
-.-\
ra#i*f is qu"feri*{
is tf}e pr*sf rsar fhe frunsacti$r.!
rii:rua{fy r$$* pdc{e, .o{JpJ€d with the presenfaf nn
{ilurf pf ftr* d*rfy$ ded,rff. tpeopde v, d}c t* {.ruz,bef*re tt,,e
S.ff, ,,1o.
ISSXIP, I June ZA!1,65, SCRA S*T; peopre v.
aro, S^R. #o.
,85Sf !, 23 fierefl?brr ?,CI#$,609 SCRJ J#4; fie.opje
rr, r:r*e.zc,
S.#. ivo, "tyi?Sr, J? Juty Z,0Ol, f?g S{"tr1i fSf; p*op{e v.
duhugotan, C.n. fjo. I'F?Atg, ti F*brusry ;0#{ gij
Scfi,d
537i,
'ftr+r:
srlprerrir* f*uur{. rulirrq lurther stre;ge-q.{ l.h;rr. tlre
"r"l?{irrr}sf *y rv*lc* rlre fnlrid ru;torr w,cs mcr7g, rv,tefhel.*r
"-"
d#seflio. rJJ-?4JR5
Decisron *
..,
ST} {JRNIRilN.
PE B AOA
Pfiii ill${ .!ur*qtt
.it;-'r t
i{
C '; I .l
]
Ittit'X +
REPUBTIC OF THE
PROVINCE OF NEGROS
--A-
t
REGIONAT TRIAT COURT
Branch 53, Bacolod City
-o0o-
CIRITO MACAPAI,
Accusdd.
X-b-i--- -----X
EI{TRY OF:APPEARANCF
A.AGUIIJIR
the accused
2 TG Building
Street, Bacolod City
PTR # 566e6L2-Ot/3t1L4
rBP# e29505 -AU3L/L4
Roll No, 33660/p.232
h tr - t1' r'{
i i't"*
i rfl
.t1 F
...'Ll''
q
i
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILI /rfl[x
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF NEGROS O 'iI
C ) ^..1,-,
,
i /' I ;.1 lJ+
6rn fudicial Region iiii i
i-; l; ,- r--..'i
Branch 53, Bacolod CitY A/
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Complainant,
NOTICE OF APPEAL
RO A, AGUITAR
the Accused
ZA6,TG Building
Gatuslao Sffeet, Bacolod City
PTR# 56696L?-oL/3LlL$
rBP e29505 o1l3t/L4
'.
Roll No. 33660/p.Z3Z
MCLE IV-0000199?-6 / t / LL
Copy Furnished: