Brain Tumor Detection with Machine Learning

Shammi Rai Kumar Kashyap

Master of Computer Application Master of Computer Application
GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY, INDIA GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY, INDIA
shammi.22scse2030623@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in kumar.22scse2030624@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in

Sanjeev Kumar Chaurasiya

Master of Computer Application
GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY, INDIA
sanjeev.22scse2030446@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in

Abstract about the type of tumor and its severity. It

Cells develop in an unexpected way,
leading to the development of a brain
tumor. This study proposes a machine,
learning-based model.
Algorithms to accurately identify brain
tumors in magnetic synchronization
pictures. The segmentation technique and
features extraction approach both make
use of a Convolutional Neural Network
(CNN). The dataset was taken from a
source on the internet. The outcomes
demonstrate the effectiveness of this
technique, which has achieved an accuracy
of 97.79%. It is well acknowledged that
one of the most challenging procedures in
medical research is the detection of brain
tumors. Because brain tumors can come in
a variety of sizes and shapes.
It is exceedingly challenging to both
analyze and find them. Brain tumors
develop from a variety of cell types, which
can inform us
may be located in many places on the
brain, revealing the kind of cells produced,
which is useful knowledge for a later
diagnosis.
Any model created to construct a
projection may have certain restrictions
because it is highly challenging to
determine the presence of a tumor from
raw image analysis.
This article suggests a brand-new
machine-learning technique to identify
brain tumors from diverse MRI scans. It
discusses pre-processing methods that
have been put up for training and testing as
well as evaluating their effects on our
dataset of MRI pictures. In order to
conduct experiments and produce a
successful projection, a dataset with
various tumor shapes, sizes, textures, and
locations is used.
 Introduction
One of the most difficult medical disorders
to identify and cure is brain tumors.
For a brain tumor to be successfully
treated and for patients to experience
improved outcomes, accurate and early
identification is essential. Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed
Tomography (CT) scans are two common
medical imaging techniques used in
traditional methods of detecting brain
tumors. However, interpreting these
images can be laborious and arbitrary,
resulting in mistakes and delays in
diagnosis.
Machine learning algorithms have
emerged as potential technologies for brain
tumor identification in recent years. Large
amounts of medical data can be analyzed
using machine learning algorithms, which
can also be used to spot intricate patterns
and anticipate outcomes. These algorithms
can be taught to recognize distinctive
features of brain tumors by being trained
on categorized datasets of brain scans,
enabling automatic and effective detection.
Detecting brain tumors using machine
learning algorithms frequently falls under
the heading of supervised learning. A
model is trained using supervised learning
Stroke lesions
Brain tumors are classified as aggressive
or slow growing. Unlike tumors that
spread from one point to another, benign
on a categorized dataset where each image
is assigned to a certain class (tumor or
non-tumor). Based on the features taken
from the photos, the model learns to
distinguish between the classes.
The identification of brain tumors depends
heavily on feature extraction.
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs),
among other methods, may automatically
extract pertinent information from brain
scans. CNNs are highly suited for medical
image analysis because they excel at
capturing geometric patterns and local
structures. The model can be used to
analyze fresh, unidentified brain scans
after it has been trained.
The algorithm analyses the input image,
extracts information, and predicts whether
a tumor will be present or not. This
automated method drastically reduces the
time and effort needed for a manual
explanation, freeing medical professionals
to concentrate on making an accurate
diagnosis and formulating a treatment
plan. The availability of large-scale
datasets is expanding, which helps in the
development of machine-learning models
for brain tumor identification. For the
purpose of gathering and analyzing brain
images, researchers can work with medical
organizations or acquire publically
accessible databases. This data-driven
methodology makes it possible to train
more robust and generalizable models,
which boosts precision and dependability.
tumors do not penetrate tissues. WHO
defines brain tumors in grades I to IV.
Grade I and II tumors are considered slow-
growing, but grade III and IV tumors are
more aggressive and have a poor
prognosis. In this case, the special situation
of brain tumors of various levels is as
follows. These tumors grow slowly and do
not spread quickly. These can be3
completely removed with surgery and have
a much higher chance of long-term
survival. Grade I pilocytic astrocytoma is
an example of this tumor. Although these
tumors grow slowly, they can spread to
nearby tissues and grow to higher lymph
nodes. Oligodendroglioma is an example
of one of these tumors. These tumors may
spread to surrounding tissues and grow
faster than grade II tumors. For some
cancers, surgery alone is not enough,
followed by radiation or chemotherapy.
Anaplastic astrocytoma is an example of
this tumor.
This cancer is the most aggressive and
spreads widely. Even nerves can be used
by them to grow rapidly.
Ischemic stroke
Ischemic stroke is a brain illness that is
aggressive and a major global cause of
disability and mortality.
An ischemic stroke happens when the
blood supply to the brain is cut off, killing
the advanced tissues in hours and causing
perfusion.
Positron Emission Tomography
In positron emission tomography, a unique
class of radioactive tracers is used.
Through the use of PET, metabolic brain
tumor characteristics such as blood flow,
glucose metabolism, lipid synthesis,
oxygen consumption, and amino acid
*metabolism are examined. It is still
regarded as one of the most effective
metabolic procedures and makes use of
fluorodeoxyglucose, the greatest nuclear
medicine agent. FDG is a popular PET
&tracer for brain imaging. FDG-PET
pictures, however, have certain drawbacks,
such as the inability to distinguish between
necrosis radiation and a recurring high-
grade (HG) tumor. Radioactive tracers
used in PET scans can have negative
effects on the human body and result in an
allergic reaction after the scan.
A patient may be allergic to iodine and
aspartame. PET tracers cannot reliably
localize atomical features due to poor
resolution compared to MRI scans.
Computed tomography
Computed tomography images provide
more detailed information than images
produced by standard X-rays. Since its
inception. CT scanning has been widely
recognized and recommended. CT scans
can show bones, blood vessels, and soft
tissues in different parts of the body. It
uses more energy than normal X-rays.

Most CT scans expose you to more
radiation, which can you increase your risk
of cancer.
Cancer risk was evaluated according to CT
radiation dose. The high contrast between
tissues in an MRI scan provides a clear
image of the body that cannot be seen in a
CT scan.
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI scans are used to examine areas of
the body and can also help detect brain
abnormalities earlier than other tests.
Brain structure makes tumor segmentation
a difficult task. In this context, feature
extraction and reduction techniques and
deep learning techniques, segmentation
techniques, and deep learning techniques
are used. Benchmark datasets and
performance metrics are provided.
Literature Review
This is true! Here are excerpts from two
literature reviews on machine learning for
brain diagnostics Dr. S. Harini and R. Rani
Hema Malini (2018), Machine Learning
Techniques for Brain Tumor Detection and
Classification:
This literature review presents several
machine-learning techniques to identify
and classify brain tumors. The authors
review the importance of accurate and
early brain recognition and point out the
disadvantages of traditional methods. The
authors then provide a comprehensive
review of research that uses machine
learning to detect brain tumors, including
support vector machines (SVM), artificial
neural networks (ANNs), and decision
trees. This study discusses many topics
such as comparisons, subtraction
techniques, and classification algorithms.
The need for larger and more diverse
datasets, the combination of multiple
variants, and the development of
automated systems to identify real tumors
are some of the challenges and future
directions that the authors will face.
Machine Learning Techniques in Brain
Tumor Image Analysis: A Review (2019)
by A. Rahman, et al.:
The application of machine learning to
brain tumor imaging is the subject of this
review. To develop an effective treatment
plan, the authors explain the importance of
correct classification, classification, and
diagnosis of brain tumors. They reviewed
research on various machine learning
techniques used to identify brain tumors,
such as CNNs, SVMs, random forests, and
deep learning. Pre-processing, feature
extraction, segmentation, and classification
are a few steps of neural network analysis
covered in this paper.
The authors discuss the problems and
limitations of current methods, such as the
need for data collection, interpretation of Due to its slow operation, the anisotropic
deep learning models, and integration of diffusion filter is suitable for practical
multimodal information. They also applications. It is difficult to smooth edges
highlight the potential of cutting-edge when the noise of the image is high.
methods such as adaptive learning and
Another step in the pre-processing stage is
group learning to improve mental focus.
to normalize the density of the image. For
Title: "Brain Tumor Detection and this, the Modified Curvature Diffusion
Classification for Machine Learning Equation (MCDE) is used. A Wiener filter
Techniques: A Review" (2019) Authors: was used to improve local and regional
Anusha Y., Ramachandran. data in treatment. N4ITK for bias
correction, median filter for image
Summary: This article presents several
smoothing, anisotropic diffusion filter,
machine-learning techniques to identify
recording, sharpening, and skull stripping
and classify brain tumors. It addresses the
with the Brain Extraction Tool (BET) is
question of how to prepare brain images
the most used pre-processing technology.
for analysis and provides an overview of
the various machine-learning methods
used in the literature. The review
highlights the strengths and weaknesses of
each method and points to potential
directions for further research, such as
combining multiple algorithms to improve
accuracy.
Pre-processing
Prioritization is an important step to
extract the required zones. 2D Brain
Extraction Algorithm m (BEA), FMRIB Segmentation
software library, and BSE were used to
From input images, segmentation extracts
extract non-brain tissues. Bias is a major
the appropriate region. Due to the
problem in MRI due to radio frequency
deficiencies, in manual segmentation
coil defects called density
methods, semi and fully automatic
inhomogeneities. Different situations
methods have been used. The semi-
require the use of linear, nonlinear, fixed,
automatic method has good results
multi-scale, and pixel-based pre-
compared to manual partitioning.
processing methods. Brain segmentation
Initiation, Evaluation, and Response
was performed using AFINITI. Therefore,
Feedback are the other three categories of
an automated process is used which allows
semi-automated processes.
the computer software to do the
segmentation, eliminating the need for
human contact.
Traditional Techniques
Local volumetric effects occur when
The following categories are added to the
different textures occupy the same pixel.
traditional techniques:
MRI refers to random noise as a
distribution.  Thresholding techniques
 Regional growth techniques.
  Watershed techniques.
Thresholding methods
The threshold method is a simple and
effective method for classifying required
objects, but choosing the best threshold in
a heterogeneous image can be difficult.
Histogram analysis was used to select the
threshold based on the reference image.
The Gaussian distribution can be used to
best estimate. Many methods can be used
where the threshold cannot be determined
from the entire histogram image or where
a single threshold cannot produce good
segmentation results.
Thresholding techniques are often used as
a first step in segmentation.
Region growing (RG) methods
In the RG method, unconnected image
pixels are checked from neighboring pixels
using the similarity method before they are
combined with homogeneity features.
Tomorrow's effects can block the space
created, giving greater accuracy. MRGM is
recommended as a remedy for this effect.
Area expansion with the BA method is
also shown.
Watershed methods
The watershed method is used to
evaluate the use of the image since the
MR image has high supra-molecular
liquid densities. The basin can cause
excessive isolation due to noise. Accurate
segmentation results can be obtained by
combining a combination of liquid
transformation and statistical methods.
Topological watershed, Image Forest
Transformation (IFT) watershed, and
marker-based watershed are a few
examples of watershed algorithms.
Potentially improved data quality
analysis for psychiatric diagnosis. As
tumor cells grow to different sizes,
existing segmentation methods for tumor
segmentation need to be further
developed. Enhancement and
segmentation are important in tumor
recognition and can overcome the
limitations of current methods.
Feature extraction methods
GLCM, geometrical features (Area,
Perimeter, and Roundness), First-order
Statistical (FOS), GWT, Hu Moment
Invariants (HMI), Multifractal Features,
3D Hara lick features, LBP, GWT, HOG,
texture and shape, co-occurrence matrix,
gradient, run-length matrix, SFTA,
curvature features, Gabor-like multi-scale
text on features, Gabor wavelet, and
statistical features are used for feature
extraction.
Table No.1 Summary of the accuracy of the publicly available page titles with drawbacks
S.NO PAGE TITLE YEAR METHODS ACCURACY DRAWBACK
1. Image K-Mean and 79% Resulting in
processing Fuzzy C- warped
and GSM 2017 Mean borders and
transmission boundaries
of tumor data
for the
detection of
brain tumors
2. Simple image Fuzzy 86% The least
processing 2017 Symmetric number of
technique for measure missed
detecting MRI alarms
tumor slice
abnormalities
3. Segmenting Morphological 74.4% Not
brain tumors 2016 Operators and applicable to
using K-Mean global cluster
modified K-
Means and
morphological
procedures
4. Using an MRI Classification 62% When only
image, 2016 categorization
automatically is used, the
identify, low-quality
segment, and image is
classify brain ignored.
tumors
5. Using fuzzy Fuzzy C- 79.69% Neglected to
c-means and 2015 Mean and apply region-
mean-shift, Mean-Shift growing and
efficient fuzzy
picture segmentation
segmentation
for the
identification
of brain
tumors
6. Segmenting a Conditional 89% Aware
CRF for the 2014 Random Field affinity
 Detection of (CRF) exhibits
brain tumors comparable
abilities.
7. CNN offers a Convolutional 99.33% The proposed
segmentation- 2018 Neural CNN model
free approach Network facilitates
that does (CNN) brain MRI-
away with the based
necessity for automated
manually feature
created learning.
feature
extractor
methods.
8. Using the Using the 92.66% Current K-
CNN Weiner filter implies
algorithm, 2018 and the CNN methods
brain tumor algorithm for cannot be
detection and image directly
disease processing exchanged
prediction with CNN
9. Brain tumor Deep learning 97.9% Slower yields
detection with neural were the
CNN and ML 2021 network, K- result of the
Means system's
Algorithm extensive
hardware
computation
requirements.
10. Imaging Pre-processing 96.47% Brain cancer
processing for technique and detection was
the detection 2020 segmentation limited to
of brain segmentation
tumors and did not
identify the
cancer's
stage.
11. Deep Transfer 95.63% The system
Learning for 2016 learning using fails to
Detection of DNN identify the
Brain tumor kind.
Tumours
12. A classifier Feature 99.3% The only way
for MRI brain 2015 extraction and to extract
images that classification features is
can identify based on KNN from an MR
tumor illness image.
13. Methods of MRI, CT scan, 96.51% The
image 2022 Ultrasound, processing
processing for SPECT, PET, methods only
 finding brain
tumors
14. Measurement
of the noise in 2021
MR images'
magnitude
Limitations of current Machine Learning
Methods
This article reviews the latest research on
the identification of brain tumors, showing
that there is still time for progress. Noise is
added to MR images during image sharing
and removing that noise is a challenge.
Accurate segmentation is a difficult
process due to the structure and
characteristics of tumor cells. Another
difficult problem is to select and extract
the best features and suitability of training
and test samples to improve the
classification. Deep learning models are
Conclusion
Accurately identifying brain tumors is
difficult because of their appearance and
variability in size, shape, and structure.
Although the tumor segmentation method
has shown great potential in the analysis
and detection of tumors on MRI images to
optimize and classify tumor sites, many
improvements are still needed. Existing
studies have limitations and problems in
classifying healthy and unhealthy images
and determining the localization of tumors.
In summary, this research covers all
relevant issues and recent studies,
shortcomings, and challenges. Knowing
and X-ray work with
MR pictures.
Image 88.5% The outcome
segmentation was not
and dataset precise
clustering enough.
using FCM
profitable because they learn features
automatically, even though they use a lot
of memory and processing resources.
Therefore, it is necessary to create a racing
car that provides high ACC in a short time.
Stroke and glioma tumors are not alike. It
has tentacle-like and diffuse features that
are difficult for segmentation and
classification. Even a small amount of
tumor detection poses a threat as it can be
mistaken for a normal area.
how to conduct new research quickly and
accurately will be beneficial to researchers.
Deep learning techniques have yielded
great results, but still require extensive
techniques. This process is more effective
when training and testing on different
products (multiple applications and
solutions); However, the slight difference
between the training and test images
directly affects the strength of the sex.
Future studies may use real patient data
from various imaging (scanner) methods to
identify brain tumors. Both deep and craft
can be combined to improve classification
results. Similarly, efficient and accurate
methods that save radiologists time and
improve patient survival include
technologies such as quantum machine
learning.
REFERENCE
[1] Raheleh Hashemzehi Seyyed
Javad Seyyed Mahdavi Maryam
Kheirabadi Seyed Reza Kamel 2020
Detection of brain tumors from MRI
images based on deep learning using
hybrid model CNN and NADE
Elsevier B.V. in place of Nalecz
Institute of Biocybernetics and
Biomedical Engineering of the
Polish Academy of Sciences Online
Publication.
[2]. Javier Amin Muhammad Sharif
Mudassar Raza Mussarat Yasmin
2018 Detection of Brain Tumor
based on Features Fusion and
Machine Learning Journal of
Atmospheric Intelligence and
Humanized Computing Online
Publication.
[3]. Rajeshwar Nalbalwar Umakant
Majhi Raj Patil Dr.Sudhanshu 2014
Detection of Brain Tumor by using
ANN International Journal of
Research in Advent Technology 2.
[4]. Fatih Ozyurt eser sert Engin
Avci Esin Dogantekin 2019 Brain
tumor detection based on
Convolutional Neural Network with
neuromorphic expert maximum
fuzzy sure entropy Elsevier Ltd 147.
[5]. Fausto Military Seyyed-Ahmad
Ahmadi Christine Kroll Annika Plate
Verena Rozanski Juliana Maestra
Johannes Levin Olaf Dietrich Birgit
Ertz-Wagner Kai Botzel, Nassir
Nawab 2016 Hough-CNN: Deep
learning for segmentation of deep
brain regions in MRI and ultrasound
Elsevier Inc 164 92-102.
[6]. Dena Nadir George Hashem B
Jehlol Anwar Subhi Abdulhussein
Oleiwi 2015
 Brain Tumor Detection Using Shape
Features and Machine Learning
Algorithms International Journal
of Scientific & Engineering
Research 6 12 454-459.
[7]. Sobhangi Sarkar Avinash Kumar
Sabyasachi Chakraborty Satyavrat
Aich Jong-Seong Sim Hee-Cheol
Kim 2019 A CNN-based Approach
for the Detection of Brain Tumor
Using MRI Scans Test Engineering
and Management 16580 – 16586.
[8] Komal Sharma Akwinder Kaur
Shruti Gujral 2013 Brain Tumor
Detection based on Machine
Learning Algorithms International
Journal of Computer Applications.
[9]. Brain Tumor Survey:
 https://www.cancer.net/cancer-
types/brain-tumor/statistics
 https://braintumor.org/brain-tumor-
information/treatment-options/
clinical-trials/ [Feb 2020]
[10] Some references from Google
Sites:
 https://
en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/
Convolutional_neur
al_network
 https://
en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/
Artificial_neural_ne
twork
 https://
 www.geeksforgeeks  https://
.org/introduction- quillbot.com/?
convolution-neural- utm_medium=paid_
network/ search&utm_source
 https:// =google&utm_cam
en.wikipedia.org/ paign=paraphrase_d
wiki/Brain_Tumor eveloping&campaig
n_type=performanc
e_max