Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scope and Limitation
Scope and Limitation
Scope and Limitation
REF#2
Scope explained
The main purpose of stating the scope of the study is to set the context early on so that readers can interpret
the results and discussions with the given context in mind.
The scope of the study is given in broad terms and identifies any of the following elements:
Element Examples
A study carried out in winter
A study carried out over five years
Area or region
A study carried out in a lab
Delimitations explained
You could think of delimitations as EITHER of the following:
Clarifying the scope and delimitations of a study is helpful for interpreting the results because the results are
influenced by the scope and materials (delimitations). For instance, agricultural field experiments conducted
under irrigated conditions can give very different results from the experiments conducted without irrigation.
Scope and delimitations also help to make the study more replicable by specifying what was excluded. For
example, in the example mentioned earlier for delimitations, the results can be very different if samples with
greater impurities are not discarded.
In the field of medicine, the gender bias is becoming increasingly evident, which is why it is becoming important
to state – even when a sample of subjects was selected at random – the proportion of men and women in the
sample.
End note
The above explanation and examples should convince you of the need to include scope and delimitations while writing a
research paper, a thesis or even a research proposal. Do not hesitate to include them because if you do not point them
out, somebody else will!
Scope explained
The main purpose of stating the scope of the study is to set the context early on so that readers can interpret
the results and discussions with the given context in mind.
The scope of the study is given in broad terms and identifies any of the following elements:
Element Examples
A study carried out in winter
A study carried out over five years
Area or region
A study carried out in a lab
Delimitations explained
You could think of delimitations as EITHER of the following:
Clarifying the scope and delimitations of a study is helpful for interpreting the results because the results are influenced by the scope
and materials (delimitations). For instance, agricultural field experiments conducted under irrigated conditions can give very different
results from the experiments conducted without irrigation.
Scope and delimitations also help to make the study more replicable by specifying what was excluded. For example, in the example
mentioned earlier for delimitations, the results can be very different if samples with greater impurities are not discarded.
In the field of medicine, the gender bias is becoming increasingly evident, which is why it is becoming important to state – even when
a sample of subjects was selected at random – the proportion of men and women in the sample.
End note
The above explanation and examples should convince you of the need to include scope and delimitations while writing a research
paper, a thesis or even a research proposal. Do not hesitate to include them because if you do not point them out, somebody else
will!
REF#3
The scope details how in-depth your study is to explore the research question and the parameters in which it will operate in
relation to the population and timeframe.
The delimitations of a study are the factors and variables not to be included in the investigation. In other words, they are the
boundaries the researcher sets in terms of study duration, population size and type of participants, etc.
Limitations relate to the validity and reliability of the study. They are characteristics of the research design or methodology that
are out of your control but influence your research findings. Because of this, they determine the internal and external validity of
your study and are considered potential weaknesses.
In other words, limitations are what the researcher cannot do (elements outside of their control) and delimitations are what the
researcher will not do (elements outside of the boundaries they have set). Both are important because they help to put the
research findings into context, and although they explain how the study is limited, they increase the credibility and validity of a
research project.
To make things as clear as possible, you should also state why specific variables were omitted from the research scope, and
whether this was because it was a delimitation or a limitation. You should also explain why they could not be overcome with
standard research methods backed up by scientific evidence.
Your reasons should always be linked back to your research question, as all delimitations should result from trying to make
your study more relevant to your scope. Therefore, the scope and delimitations are usually considered together when writing a
paper.
How to Start Writing Your Study Delimitations
Use the below prompts as an effective way to start writing your study delimitations:
research objectives,
research questions,
research variables,
target populations,
statistical analysis techniques.
REF#4
Delimitations are the parameters set by the researcher to determine what to include and what to leave out of the research
study.
Delimitations are the elements that specify the parameters and confines of a study, such as a sample size, the environment or
setting in which it is conducted, population characteristics, etc.
Where – the study’s context or location, that is, where the data will be collected and to what entity they will belong.
When – the time period during which the data must be gathered.
Who – the topic of the investigation and the demographic from whom they will be chosen. For generalizations to be
possible, this population must be sizable.
How – how the research will be carried out, including the methodology, research tools, and analysis procedures. The research
design, such as whether it is experimental, qualitative, or a case study, will also be described.
Here are some of the effective ways to start writing your scope:
Readers should understand why the delimitation criteria were chosen, what alternatives existed, and why these alternatives
were rejected because the researcher had influence over these factors. The reader must comprehend how and why you choose
the experiment you have if, for instance, you are gathering data that can be drawn from three distinct but comparable studies.
Here are some of the effective ways effective way to start writing your study delimitations:
Let’s say one researcher wants to study the impact of using social media during working hours. In this case, it is not possible
for the researcher to cover every aspect of the topic.
Therefore, the target population will need to be isolated within the scope. In this instance, the focus could be limited to a group
of 100 employees in the Finance department at a single company. The impact could be observed for a duration of 6 months.
These would form the delimitations of the study.
In this example, the researcher might answer why he/she chooses to study sample employees of 10. Why does he/she select the
employees from the finance department, not from the HR or IT department? Why did he/she choose the XYZ Ltd company over
others?
If you are about to write a research paper then one of the first tasks you need to perform when completing research is to
identify the scope of the project. When identifying the scope, you need to address not only the problem or issue that you want
to study but the population that you want to examine.
A delimitation is sometimes called a “boundary condition,” which specifies a region beyond which a theory or hypothesis is
either changed or does not hold.
Final words
Both Scope and delimitation are equally important while writing your research paper or thesis. This provides a better
understanding to the readers and future researchers. After reading this article Scope and delimitation. All things you
need to know we hope you have a better understanding.
REF#5
Scope and delimitations are two elements of a research paper or thesis. The scope of a study explains the extent
to which the research area will be explored in the work and specifies the parameters within which the study will
be operating. For example, let's say a researcher wants to study the impact of mobile phones on behavior
patterns of elementary school children. However, it is not possible for the researcher to cover every aspect of the
topic.
So the scope will have to be narrowed down to a certain section of the target population. In this case, the scope
might be narrowed down to a group of 50 children in grades 3-5 of one specific school. Their behavior patterns in
school may have been observed for a duration of 6 months. These would form the delimitations of the study.
Thus, delimitations are the characteristics that limit the scope and describe the boundaries of the study, such as
the sample size, geographical location or setting in which the study takes place, population traits, etc.
Additionally, the researcher might also choose to use some research tools and methodologies to collect data but
not others. These delimitations might be imposed for practical reasons, such as lack of time or financial
resources to carry out a more thorough investigation. The delimitation section of the study should explain why
specific choices were made while others were excluded and how this might affect the outcome of the research.
In the example mentioned above, the researcher might state why he/she chose to study a sample population of
50 students, why he/she selected students from Grades 3-5 and not grades 1-2, and why he/she chose students of
Billabong Elementary Public School over other schools.
Basically, this means that you will have to define what the study is going to cover and what it is focusing on.
Similarly, you also have to define what the study is not going to cover. This will come under the limitations.
Generally, the scope of a research paper is followed by its limitations.
As a researcher, you have to be careful when you define your scope or area of focus. Remember that if you
broaden the scope too much, you might not be able to do justice to the work or it might take a very long time to
complete. Consider the feasibility of your work before you write down the scope. Again, if the scope is too
narrow, the findings might not be generalizable.
Typically, the information that you need to include in the scope would cover the following:
In simpler words, scope is the breadth of your study, while delimitation is the depth of your study.
Scope and delimitation are both essential components of a research project, and they are often confused with
one another. The scope defines the parameters of the study, while delimitation sets the boundaries within
those parameters. The scope and delimitation of a study are usually established early on in the research
process and guide the rest of the project.
There are a few steps that you can take to set limits and focus your study.
The scope and delimitation should be established within the parameters of the available resources. Once you
have identified the key terms or concepts, you can start to develop a glossary or list of definitions.
It is important to consider all of the different perspectives in order to get a well-rounded understanding of
your topic.
This means deciding which aspects of your topic you will focus on and which aspects you will eliminate.
Example 1
Research question: What are the effects of social media on mental health?
Scope: The scope of the study will focus on the impact of social media on the mental health of young adults
aged 18-24 in the United States.
Delimitation: The study will specifically examine the following aspects of social media: frequency of use, types
of social media platforms used, and the impact of social media on self-esteem and body image.
Example 2-
Research question: What are the factors that influence employee job satisfaction in the healthcare industry?
Scope: The scope of the study will focus on employee job satisfaction in the healthcare industry in the United
States.
Delimitation: The study will specifically examine the following factors that influence employee job satisfaction:
salary, work-life balance, job security, and opportunities for career growth.
Setting limits and defining the scope and delimitation of a research study is essential to conducting effective
research. By doing so, researchers can ensure that their study is focused, manageable, and feasible within the
given time frame and resources. It can also help to identify areas that require further study, providing a
foundation for future research.
So, the next time you embark on a research project, don’t forget to set clear limits and define the scope and
delimitation of your study. It may seem like a tedious task, but it can ultimately lead to more meaningful and
impactful research. And if you still can’t find a solution, reach out to Enago Academy using #AskEnago and tag
WHAT IS LIMITATIONS? Research limitations are, at the simplest level, the weaknesses of the
study, based on factors that are often outside of your control as the researcher. These factors could
include things like time, access to funding, equipment, data or participants.
The limitations of a study are its flaws or shortcomings which could be the result of unavailability of
resources, small sample size, flawed methodology, etc. No study is completely flawless or inclusive of all
possible aspects. Therefore, listing the limitations of your study reflects honesty and transparency and
also shows that you have a complete understanding of the topic.
Generally speaking, the limitations are added in the Discussion section, just before the concluding
paragraph. While you should definitely point out the limitations, do not get into an elaborate discussion
about them. Keep this section short and crisp. The limitations of a study basically discusses
any unanswered questions that your study did not address. Could you have used another means or
method of data collection? Could the research design have been better? Was the sample not
representative of the target population? Being self-critical and acknowledging the study’s limitations will
give the impression that you are aware of what the study was not able to cover. Moreover, it would
prevent the peer reviewer from pointing them out.
Ref#8
Let’s start with the most important takeaway point of this post – research limitations and research
delimitations are not the same – but they are related to each other (we’ll unpack that a little
later). So, if you hear someone using these two words interchangeably, be sure to share this post with
them!
Research Limitations
Research limitations are, at the simplest level, the weaknesses of the study, based on factors that
are often outside of your control as the researcher. These factors could include things like time,
access to funding, equipment, data or participants. For example, if you weren’t able to access a
random sample of participants for your study and had to adopt a convenience sampling
strategy instead, that would impact the generalizability of your findings and therefore reflect a
limitation of your study.
Research limitations can also emerge from the research design itself. For example, if you were
undertaking a correlational study, you wouldn’t be able to infer causality (since correlation
doesn’t mean certain causation). Similarly, if you utilised online surveys to collect data from your
participants, you naturally wouldn’t be able to get the same degree of rich data that you would from
in-person interviews.
Simply put, research limitations reflect the shortcomings of a study, based on practical (or
theoretical) constraints that the researcher faced. These shortcomings limit what you
can conclude from a study, but at the same time, present a foundation for future research.
Importantly, all research has limitations, so there’s no need to hide anything here – as long as
you discuss how the limitations might affect your findings, it’s all good.
Research Delimitations
Alright, now that we’ve unpacked the limitations, let’s move on to the delimitations.
Research delimitations are similar to limitations in that they also “limit” the study, but their focus is
entirely different. Specifically, the delimitations of a study refer to the scope of the research aims
and research questions. In other words, delimitations reflect the choices you, as the
researcher, intentionally make in terms of what you will and won’t try to achieve with your study.
In other words, what your research aims and research questions will and won’t include.
As we’ve spoken about many times before, it’s important to have a tight, narrow focus for your
research, so that you can dive deeply into your topic, apply your energy to one specific area and
develop meaningful insights. If you have an overly broad scope or unfocused topic, your research will
often pull in multiple, even opposing directions, and you’ll just land up with a muddy mess of
findings.
So, the delimitations section is where you’ll clearly state what your research aims and research
questions will focus on – and just as importantly, what they will exclude. For example, you might
investigate a widespread phenomenon, but choose to focus your study on a specific age group,
ethnicity or gender. Similarly, your study may focus exclusively on one country, city or even
organization. As long as the scope is well justified (in other words, it represents a novel, valuable
research topic), this is perfectly acceptable – in fact, it’s essential. Remember, focus is your friend.
Ref#10
In spite of the impact it might have (and perhaps because of it) you should clearly acknowledge any limitations in your
research paper in order to show readers—whether journal editors, other researchers, or the general public—that you
are aware of these limitations and to explain how they affect the conclusions that can be drawn from the research.
In this article, we provide some guidelines for writing about research limitations, show examples of some frequently
seen study limitations, and recommend techniques for presenting this information. And after you have finished drafting
and have received manuscript editing for your work, you still might want to follow this up with academic editing before
submitting your work to your target journal.
Furthermore, pointing out study limitations shows that you’ve considered the impact of research weakness thoroughly
and have an in-depth understanding of your research topic. Since all studies face limitations, being honest and
detailing these limitations will impress researchers and reviewers more than ignoring them.
Some journals ask you to also discuss the strengths of your work in this section, and some allow you to freely
choose where to include that information in your discussion section—make sure to always check the author
instructions of your target journal before you finalize a manuscript and submit it for peer review.
For example, if you conducted a survey to obtain your research results, your samples (participants) were asked to
respond to the survey questions. However, you might have had limited ability to gain access to the appropriate type
or geographic scope of participants. In this case, the people who responded to your survey questions may not truly
be a random sample.
Insufficient sample size for statistical measurements
When conducting a study, it is important to have a sufficient sample size in order to draw valid conclusions. The
larger the sample, the more precise your results will be. If your sample size is too small, it will be difficult to identify
significant relationships in the data.
Normally, statistical tests require a larger sample size to ensure that the sample is considered representative of a
population and that the statistical result can be generalized to a larger population. It is a good idea to understand
how to choose an appropriate sample size before you conduct your research by using scientific calculation tools—in
fact, many journals now require such estimation to be included in every manuscript that is sent out for review.
When there is very little or no prior research on a specific topic, you may need to develop an entirely new research
typology. In this case, discovering a limitation can be considered an important opportunity to identify literature gaps
and to present the need for further development in the area of study.
For example, you might realize that you should have addressed your survey questions from another viable
perspective, or that you were not able to include an important question in the survey. In these cases, you should
acknowledge the deficiency or deficiencies by stating a need for future researchers to revise their specific methods
for collecting data that includes these missing elements.
Time constraints
Just as students have deadlines to turn in their class papers, academic researchers might also have to meet
deadlines for submitting a manuscript to a journal or face other time constraints related to their research (e.g.,
participants are only available during a certain period; funding runs out; collaborators move to a new institution).
The time available to study a research problem and to measure change over time might be constrained by such
practical issues. If time constraints negatively impacted your study in any way, acknowledge this impact by
mentioning a need for a future study (e.g., a longitudinal study) to answer this research problem.
We suggest that you divide your limitations section into three steps: (1) identify the study limitations; (2) explain how
they impact your study in detail; and (3) propose a direction for future studies and present alternatives. By following
this sequence when discussing your study’s limitations, you will be able to clearly demonstrate your study’s
weakness without undermining the quality and integrity of your research.
This part should comprise around 10%-20% of your discussion of study limitations.
The first step is to identify the particular limitation(s) that affected your study. There are many possible limitations of
research that can affect your study, but you don’t need to write a long review of all possible study limitations. A 200-
500 word critique is an appropriate length for a research limitations section. In the beginning of this section, identify
what limitations your study has faced and how important these limitations are.
You only need to identify limitations that had the greatest potential impact on: (1) the quality of your findings, and (2)
your ability to answer your research question.
Step 1: Identify and describe the limitation. Here, the model’s estimates are based on
potentially biased observational studies.
After identifying your research limitations, it’s time to explain the nature of the limitations and how they potentially
impacted your study. For example, when you conduct quantitative research, a lack of probability sampling is an
important issue that you should mention. On the other hand, when you conduct qualitative research, the inability to
generalize the research findings could be an issue that deserves mention.
Explain the role these limitations played on the results and implications of the research and justify the choice you
made in using this “limiting” methodology or other action in your research. Also, make sure that these limitations
didn’t undermine the quality of your dissertation.
Step 2: Explain the limitations in detail and the potential impact. These limitations can be broken down into several subsections,
as seen in this example.
Make sure you are current on approaches used by prior studies and the impacts they have had on their findings.
Cite review articles or scientific bodies that have recommended these approaches and why. This might be evidence
in support of the approach you chose, or it might be the reason you consider your choices to be included as
limitations. This process can act as a justification for your approach and a defense of your decision to take it while
acknowledging the feasibility of other approaches.