Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nature of Search Warrant - Worlwide Web Corporation V People
Nature of Search Warrant - Worlwide Web Corporation V People
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 1 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
* FIRST DIVISION.
19
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 2 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
20
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 3 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
21
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 4 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
22
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 5 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
23
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 6 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
24
SERENO, CJ.:
Petitioners filed the present Petitions under Rule 45 of
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 7 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[1] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 10-18. The Decision of the Court of
Appeals Special Thirteenth Division in CA-G.R. CR No. 26190 was penned
by Associate Justice Roberto A. Barrios with Associate Justices Rebecca
de Guia-Salvador and Jose C. Mendoza (now a member of this Court),
concurring.
[2] Id., at pp. 20-21.
[3] Id., at pp. 69-71.
25
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 8 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
26
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 9 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[7] An IGF comprises equipment which makes possible the interfacing
or interconnection between (1) a domestic telecommunication system, like
that of PLDT, and (2) the cables or other equipment for transmitting
electronically messages from points within the Philippines to points
outside the Philippines, as well as messages originating from points
outside to points inside the Philippines. (Philippine Long Distance
Telephone Company v. National Telecommunications Commission, 311
Phil. 548, 558; 241 SCRA 486, 492 [1995]).
[8] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 87-92, Affidavit of Jose Enrico G.
Rivera.
[9] Id., at pp. 88-89.
[10] Id., at pp. 72-86, Affidavit of Raymund D. Gali.
27
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 10 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
28
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 11 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[14] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 654-661; TSN, 25 September 2001, pp.
22-29.
[15] Id., at pp. 666-669.
[16] Rollo (G.R. No. 161266), pp. 326-333.
29
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 12 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
30
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 13 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[18] Id., at pp. 343-347.
31
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 14 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[19] Id., at pp. 350-359, Inventory Receipt.
[20] Id., at p. 8, p. 6, Petition for Review on Certiorari dated 22
December 2003 filed by Planet Internet.
[21] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 97-111, Motion to Quash and to
Release Seized Articles and Documents (Re: Search Warrant No. Q-01-
3856) dated 2 October 2001.
[22] Rollo (G.R. No. 161266), pp. 360-363, Motion to Quash dated 17
October 2001.
32
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 15 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[23] Id., at pp. 364-393, dated 29 October 2001.
[24] Id., at pp. 5-6, pp. 3-4, Petition for Review on Certiorari dated 22
December 2003 filed by Planet Internet.
[25] Id., at pp. 421-429, Resolutions dated 13 November 2001. The
pertinent portion of the Resolutions reads:
While it may be true that during the application for search
warrant on September 25, 2001, in view of the technical nature of
the crime alleged to be committed, the Court ordered for these things
to be seized, the Court now admits it was precipitate in doing so.
A perusal of the items that were ordered seized by the Court
reveals that they partake of a general warrant so much so that they
can likewise be used by the respondents in their legitimate business.
Thus, the effect of such issuance would literally place the herein
respondents out of business.
33
_______________
[26] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 158-166, Motion for Reconsideration
dated 16 November 2001.
[27] Id., at p. 175, Resolution dated 14 December 2001.
[28] Id., at pp. 10-18, Decision of the CA Special Thirteenth Division in
CA-G.R. CR No. 26190 dated 20 August 2003. In concluding that the
assailed warrants were not general warrants, the CA reasoned:
Unlike in the cases cited by the appellees, the search warrants did
not sanction indiscriminately the taking of things regardless of
whether the transactions for which these were used were legal or
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 16 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
34
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 17 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
tion the nature of the articles so described, it is clear that no other
more adequate and detailed description could have been given. (Italics in
the original)
[29] CA Rollo, pp. 450-480.
[30] Rollo (G.R. No. 161266), pp. 28-29, Resolution of the CA Former
Special Thirteenth Division in CA-G.R. CR No. 26190 dated 27 November
2003.
[31] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 23-51.
[32] Rollo (G.R. No. 161266), pp. 3-18.
[33] Id., at pp. 62-63, Resolution dated 4 February 2004.
35
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 18 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[34] RULES OF COURT, Rule 126, Sec. 2.
[35] G.R. No. 104879, 6 May 1994, 232 SCRA 249.
36
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 19 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[36] Id., at pp. 256-257.
[37] Washington Distillers, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 329 Phil. 650; 260
SCRA 821 (1996); Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Flores, G.R. No. 78631, 29
June 1993, 223 SCRA 761; 20th Century Fox Films Corp.
37
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 20 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
v. Court of Appeals, 247 Phil. 624; 164 SCRA 655 (1988); La Chemise Lacoste,
SA v. Fernandez, 214 Phil. 332; 129 SCRA 373 (1984).
[38] 200 Phil. 137; 114 SCRA 657 (1982).
38
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 21 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[39] Id., at pp. 142-143; pp. 662-663.
[40] Malaloan v. Court of Appeals, supra.
[41] Marcelo v. de Guzman, supra at p. 143; p. 662.
39
II.
Trial judges determine probable cause in the
exercise of their judicial functions. A trial judge s
finding of probable cause for the issuance of a search
warrant is accorded respect by reviewing courts when
the finding has substantial basis.
Petitioners claim that no probable cause existed to
justify the issuance of the search warrants.
The rules pertaining to the issuance of search warrants
are enshrined in Section 2, Article III of the 1987
Constitution:
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 22 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[42] Microsoft Corporation v. Maxicorp, Inc., 481 Phil. 550, 565; 438
SCRA 224, 234 (2004).
[43] Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 329 Phil. 875; 261
SCRA 144 (1996).
40
_______________
[44] Manly Sportwear Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dadodette Enterprises,
507 Phil. 375; 470 SCRA 384 (2005).
[45] Santos v. Pryce Gases, Inc., G.R. No. 165122, 23 November 2007,
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 23 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
41
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 24 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[47] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), p. 599, p. 22, Comment (to Planet
Internet s Petition) by PLDT.
42
the crime, not of toll bypass per se, but of theft of PLDT s
international long distance call business committed by
means of the alleged toll bypass operations.
For theft to be committed in this case, the following
elements must be shown to exist: (1) the taking by
petitioners (2) of PLDT s personal property (3) with intent
to gain (4) without the consent of PLDT (5) accomplished
without the use of violence against or intimidation of
persons or the use of force upon things.[48]
Petitioners WWC and Cherryll Yu only take issue with
categorizing the earnings and business as personal
properties of PLDT. However, in Laurel v. Abrogar,[49] we
have already held that the use of PLDT s communications
facilities without its consent constitutes theft of its
telephone services and business:
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 25 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
[48] People v. Avecilla, G.R. No. 46370, 2 June 1992, 209 SCRA 466.
[49] G.R. No. 155076, 13 January 2009, 576 SCRA 41, 56-57.
43
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 26 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
44
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 27 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
change facilities of the originating country. In both instances, the
international calls completed were made to appear as having originated
and at the same time destined to an area within the Philippines. Hence, it
is regarded and charged as a local or domestic call.
45
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 28 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
[52] Abuan v. People, 536 Phil. 672, 700-701; 505 SCRA 799, 824 (2006).
[53] Id.
[54] Id.
[55] Rollo (G.R. No. 161266), p. 36.
46
_______________
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 29 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
[56] Bache and Co. (Phil.), Inc. v. Ruiz, 147 Phil. 794; 37 SCRA 823
(1971).
[57] 365 Phil. 54; 306 SCRA 70 (1999).
[58] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 303-336.
47
that the scheme was a case of electronic theft, and that the
items sought to be seized could not be described with
calibrated precision. According to the OSG, assuming that
the seized items could also be used for other legitimate
businesses, the fact remains that the items were used in
the commission of an offense.
A general warrant is defined as (a) search or arrest
warrant that is not particular as to the person to be
arrested or the property to be seized. [59] It is one that
allows the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing
another and gives the officer executing the warrant the
discretion over which items to take.[60]
Such discretion is abhorrent, as it makes the person,
against whom the warrant is issued, vulnerable to abuses.
Our Constitution guarantees our right against
unreasonable searches and seizures, and safeguards have
been put in place to ensure that people and their properties
are searched only for the most compelling and lawful
reasons.
Section 2, Article III of the 1987 Constitution provides:
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 30 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[59] Black s Law Dictionary, warrant, p. 1585.
[60] Vallejo v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 156413, 14 April 2004, 427
SCRA 658.
48
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 31 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
_______________
[61] Id., at p. 670.
49
_______________
[62] People v. Veloso, 48 Phil. 169 (1925).
[63] Hon Ne Chan v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 565 Phil. 545, 557; 541
SCRA 249, 262 (2007).
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 32 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
[64] Id.
[65] People v. Veloso, supra, at p. 182.
[66] Bache and Co. (Phil.), Inc. v. Ruiz, supra note 56.
50
_______________
[67] Rollo (G.R. No. 161106), pp. 648-649.
[68] G.R. Nos. 170217 and 170694, 10 December 2012, 687 SCRA 426.
[69] The description in the search warrants reads:
a) LINES, CABLES AND ANTENNAS or equipment or device
capable of transmitting air waves or frequency, such as an IPL and
telephone lines and equipment;
b) COMPUTERS or any equipment or device capable of accepting
information applying the prescribed process of the information and
supplying the result of this processes;
c) MODEMS or any equipment or device that enaliles data terminal
equipment such as computers to communicate with each other data-
terminal equipment via a telephone line;
d) MULTIPLEXERS or any equipment or device that enables two or
more signals from different sources to pass through a common cable
or transmission line;
e) SWITCHING EQUIPMENT or equipment or device capable of
connecting telephone lines;
f) SOFTWARE, DISKETTES, TAPES, OR EQUIPMENT, or device
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 33 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
51
_______________
communications and documents pertaining to securing and using
telephone lines and or equipment in relation to Mr. Yap/HPS ISR
Operations.
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 34 of 35
SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 713 10/29/23, 8:32 AM
https://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000018b78d8e3d82b06ce36000d00d40059004a/p/ASX894/?username=Guest Page 35 of 35