Name: Rocel I.

Navaja
Class Schedule: 2:30PM- 6:00 PM SUNDAY

Learning Insight 3

Summary:

Report 1 is all about developing authentic classroom assessments and its tool. Authentic
assessment is a student evaluation approach that emphasizes the practical application of skills
and knowledge in real-world contexts. It differs from traditional methods like multiple-choice
tests, aiming to measure higher-order thinking skills such as problem solving, critical thinking,
creativity, and collaboration. Developing authentic assessments involves using performance
tasks, rubrics, portfolios, peer, and self-assessment, and involving an authentic audience. This
approach fosters deeper learning, engagement, and the development of essential competencies
in students. Additionally, providing regular feedback is crucial for the effectiveness of authentic
assessments. Developing authentic classroom assessments involves creating assessments that
mirror real-world tasks and allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in
meaningful ways. The process includes four stages: planning and alignment with learning
objectives, designing tasks that reflect real-world applications, establishing clear evaluation
criteria, and implementing the assessment. Assessment tools like rubrics and digital platforms
can enhance the process. This approach promotes engaged learning and provides valuable
feedback to both students and teachers. Developing authentic classroom assessments entails a
structured four-step process.
First, educators must establish clear learning objectives aligned with educational goals.
Next, they design assessment tasks that mirror real-world scenarios, fostering practical
application of knowledge. Subsequently, transparent evaluation criteria are essential for
consistent grading. Finally, providing constructive feedback and encouraging reflection enables
students to internalize their learning experiences. Digital platforms and multimedia resources
serve as valuable tools, streamlining the assessment process and enhancing its effectiveness.
This approach ensures assessments accurately measure student comprehension and promote
meaningful learning outcomes.
Report 2 is all about Performance assessment. Performance assessment is an
evaluative method that involves observing and measuring a student's ability to apply their
knowledge, skills, and competencies in real-world contexts. It goes beyond traditional tests or
exams by focusing on practical application and demonstration of skills rather than just
memorization. The main objective of performance assessment is to assess a student's ability to
perform tasks or solve problems in a manner that mirrors actual situations they might encounter
in their academic or professional lives. The nature of performance assessment is rooted in
several key principles.
First, it emphasizes authentic tasks, meaning assessments are designed to replicate
real-world scenarios. This ensures that students are assessed on their ability to apply their
knowledge in practical situations. Second, performance assessments often involve open-ended
tasks, allowing students to approach problems from various angles and demonstrate creativity
and critical thinking. Additionally, they often incorporate criteria-based evaluation, with clear
standards or rubrics that outline expectations for performance. This transparency helps both
students and evaluators understand the assessment criteria. Lastly, performance assessments
often encourage self-reflection and self-assessment, promoting metacognition and a deeper
understanding of one's own learning process. In essence, performance assessment serves as a
more holistic and comprehensive means of evaluating a student's capabilities. It provides a
clearer picture of their practical skills, problem-solving abilities, and application of knowledge in
real-world settings. By focusing on these aspects, performance assessment offers a more
accurate reflection of a student's readiness for future academic or professional challenges.
Report 3 is all about Developing Performance Tasks. Developing performance tasks
involves several key considerations. Firstly, it entails the thoughtful design of tasks that require
students to apply their knowledge and skills in real-world contexts. This involves creating
scenarios or prompts that challenge students to demonstrate their understanding in practical
situations. One effective model for designing authentic performance tasks is the GRASPS
model, which stands for Goal, Role, Audience, Situation, Products, and Standards. This guide
provides a structured framework for crafting tasks by specifying the desired outcome, the role
the student takes on, the intended audience, the context or situation, the products to be
produced, and the standards or criteria for evaluation.
Additionally, it's crucial to differentiate performance tasks to cater to diverse learners.
This involves modifying the tasks to accommodate varying levels of ability, learning styles, and
interests. By providing options for how students can approach and demonstrate their
understanding, educators can ensure that assessments are accessible and meaningful for all
students. Scoring rubrics are essential tools for evaluating performance tasks. They come in
various types, including holistic (providing an overall assessment) and analytic (evaluating
specific criteria separately). Rubrics typically consist of components or criteria that outline the
expectations for performance. These criteria are broken down into levels of proficiency, allowing
for a nuanced evaluation. Developing effective rubrics requires clear and specific language to
define each level of performance. Interpreting and utilizing rubric scores involves providing
constructive feedback to students, identifying areas for improvement, and informing instructional
decisions. It also serves as a means of communicating expectations and standards to students,
helping them understand what is required for success in the task. In summary, developing
performance tasks involves designing tasks that require practical application of knowledge and
skills. The GRASPS model provides a structured guide for crafting authentic tasks, while
differentiation ensures inclusivity for diverse learners. Scoring rubrics are crucial for fair and
specific evaluation, with clear components and levels of proficiency. Utilizing rubric scores
allows for targeted feedback and informs instructional strategies for improved student learning.

Reaction:

This report on developing authentic classroom assessments is highly informative and

well-structured. It effectively highlights the importance of practical application in assessments,
moving beyond traditional methods. The emphasis on higher-order thinking skills like problem
solving and critical thinking is commendable, as it aligns with modern educational goals. The
four-step process outlined for assessment development provides a clear roadmap for educators,
ensuring that assessments are meaningful and aligned with learning objectives. The
incorporation of tools like rubrics and digital platforms is a practical approach to enhancing
assessment effectiveness. Overall, this report offers valuable insights into creating assessments
that genuinely measure student comprehension and promote deeper learning.
 This report on performance assessment provides a thorough understanding of the
concept and its significance. The emphasis on observing practical application in real-world
contexts is a strong departure from traditional evaluation methods. The principles outlined,
including authenticity, open-ended tasks, and criteria-based evaluation, offer a comprehensive
framework for effective assessment. The focus on self-reflection and self-assessment
encourages students to take ownership of their learning process, promoting metacognition. This
report successfully demonstrates how performance assessment provides a more holistic view of
a student's capabilities, preparing them for future academic and professional challenges.

The report on developing performance tasks is a valuable resource for educators

seeking to create meaningful assessments. The incorporation of the GRASPS model provides a
structured and practical approach to task design, ensuring that assessments are aligned with
specific goals and expectations. The emphasis on differentiation to cater to diverse learners is a
crucial consideration, acknowledging the varying abilities and learning styles within a classroom.
The explanation of scoring rubrics and their importance in evaluation is well-articulated. The
report effectively highlights the significance of clear criteria and feedback for student growth and
understanding. Overall, this report offers a comprehensive guide to designing performance
tasks that truly assess student capabilities.

In all three reports, the emphasis on practical application, clear evaluation criteria, and
meaningful feedback is evident. These aspects align with modern educational principles,
promoting deeper learning and skill development. The incorporation of models and tools like the
GRASPS model and rubrics provides educators with concrete strategies to implement in their
assessment practices. These reports collectively contribute to a positive shift in assessment
methodologies towards more authentic and student-centered approaches.

Reflection:

As a college instructor, the report on developing authentic classroom assessments and

its tools offers valuable insights into enhancing the effectiveness of my teaching methods. The
structured four-step process provides a clear framework for creating assessments that align
closely with learning objectives. This will enable me to design tasks that mirror real-world
situations, encouraging students to apply their knowledge in practical contexts. The emphasis
on transparent evaluation criteria is particularly beneficial, as it ensures consistency in grading
and helps students understand the expectations. This will lead to fairer assessments and
provide students with a clearer understanding of their performance. Additionally, the importance
of constructive feedback and reflection resonates strongly. Implementing these practices will
allow students to actively engage with their learning, fostering deeper comprehension and
retention of the material. In terms of practical application, I intend to incorporate digital platforms
and multimedia resources to facilitate the assessment process. This will streamline the creation,
distribution, and grading of assessments, ultimately saving time and ensuring a more efficient
workflow. Moreover, I will explore innovative approaches, such as project-based assessments
and simulations, to create authentic scenarios that challenge students to apply their knowledge
in meaningful ways. Overall, this report will significantly impact my approach as a college
instructor. By adopting the recommended practices and utilizing appropriate tools, I aim to
create a more engaging and effective learning environment for my students, ultimately
enhancing their educational experience and outcomes.
 Upon reflecting on these reports, I am struck by the clear and actionable strategies they
provide for enhancing assessment practices in the college classroom. The emphasis on
practical application, higher-order thinking, and self-reflection aligns seamlessly with my
educational philosophy. The four-step assessment development process offers a structured
approach, ensuring assessments are purposeful and aligned with learning objectives. I can see
myself implementing this process to create assessments that truly gauge student
understanding. The incorporation of tools like rubrics and digital platforms resonates with me as
well. These resources can streamline the evaluation process and provide students with concrete
feedback, which is invaluable for their growth. Additionally, the focus on differentiation
acknowledges the diverse learning styles and abilities within a classroom, allowing for a more
inclusive approach to assessment.

The reports' advocacy for performance assessment is particularly appealing.

Encouraging students to apply their knowledge in real-world contexts not only reinforces their
learning but also prepares them for future challenges. The principles of authenticity, open-ended
tasks, and criteria-based evaluation offer a comprehensive framework for effective assessment.
As a college instructor, I see great potential in applying these insights. I plan to integrate the
GRASPS model into my assessment design process, ensuring that tasks are aligned with
specific goals and expectations. Additionally, I will make deliberate efforts to encourage self-
reflection and self-assessment among my students, empowering them to take ownership of their
learning journey.

Overall, these reports serve as a valuable resource that resonates deeply with my
teaching philosophy. They provide concrete strategies to create assessments that genuinely
measure comprehension and promote deeper learning. I am excited to implement these
approaches in my courses, confident that they will contribute to a more enriching and effective
learning experience for my students.