Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hendler 1975
Hendler 1975
Hendler 1975
GORDON HENDLER
. and
691
692 GORDON HENDLER
too large for bursal brooding, hence exter- mechanisms for ontogenesis of coelomic
nal brooding. sacs, and larval arms and skeleton. Arms
"Kirk's ophiuroid," studied by Fell and their skeletal supports are resorbed in
(19416), shows a clear case of direct develop- different numbers, order, and extent in dif-
ment. Development of this unknown ferent species as reviewed by Mortensen
species occurs within egg capsules of un- (1931). For example, it is typical of the
known origin and structure. The egg is ophiothricids to discard the postero-lateral
about 0.5 mm in diameter and gives rise to a arms and body skeleton during metamor-
juvenile presumably of the same size. The phosis. Other characters of possible sys-
embryo, superficially bilateral on account tematic and evolutionary importance in-
of two "epibolic crests" formed during gas- clude vibratile lobes of ophiocomids, simple
trulation, ultimately assumes a penta- versus compound skeletons, and transverse
radiate shape. A juvenile emerges from the or median rods, as well as changes in cilia-
The young of. A. abditus and possibly mentioned, Patent (1970) has described a
Ophiophragmus wurdemani as well as the unique larva for Gorgonocephalus caryi. This
"Jugendformen von Ophiuren" found in a species shows an irregular bilateral sym-
deep plankton haul off Antarctica by Mor- metry, lacks a larval skeleton and cilia, is
tensen (19136) develop within a fertiliza- schizocoelous, and apparently develops
tion membrane (Hendler, 1973). Although demersally. The significance of this exotic
A. abditus and possibly 0. wurdemani have form will be discussed later.
pluteus-like embryos, the early stages of the
Jugendformed are unknown (Nachtrieb,
1885; Mortensen, 19136). Development PATTERNS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOPMENT: QUAN-
within the fertilization membrane may be TITATIVE
an important ecological adaptation, and I
have discussed the value of demersal de- The foregoing section has documented
similarities and differences in ophiuroid
cated the actual range is broader, and data magnitude in the numbers of eggs per indi-
for 22 species (Table 1) show values from vidual. Ophionereis vivipara, on the other
0.1- to 0.9-mm egg diameter. hand, has broods of juveniles at mixed
The possibility that viviparous forms stages of development. Its eggs are 0.23
with small eggs contribute to the nutrition mm in diameter while another tropical vi-
of their young by secretions from their bur- viparous form, Amphiura vivipara, has
sae is suggested (but not proven) for Axiog- 0.5-mm eggs.
nathus squamatus (Fell, 1940; Fontaine and The number of eggs and the total volume
Chia, 1968) and is likely in Ophionotus hexac- of eggs per individual show a gradation
tis which reportedly has intraovarian rather among viviparous species as does egg
than bursal brooding (Mortensen, 1920a, diameter (see Figs. 1, 2). But a striking
1921). The fact that the diameter of the margin of at least an order of magnitude
viviparous embryo may be two or three separates values for egg number and total
Larger sizes might be expected in the cold, Its ophiopluteus, however, is a reduced
dense waters of high latitudes, but the Ant- form with only one pair of larval arms and
arctic form Ophiopluteus irregularis, has metamorphosis has been found to occur
only two arm segments, a terminal plate within 8 days (Fenaux, 1963).
and a fairly large disc diameter of 0.7 mm My contention presented above, that
(Mortensen, 1913*). other reduced plutei (e.g., Ophiopluteus
Newly hatched young of viviparous claparedi) have abbreviated development, is
forms generally have disc diameters of 1.0 strengthened since A. chiajei, with a re-
mm and 10 or more arm segments (e.g., duced pluteus, has several of the quantita-
Ludwig, 1899). The range encompasses tive characteristics of the abbreviated de-
diameters of 0.6 to 5.0 mm and 8 to 40 arm velopers (Table 3). I would also predict that
segments, appreciably different from A. chiajei post-larvae are a small size at set-
planktonic post-larvae (Fig. 9). The major tlement as are other abbreviated forms.
a
ID
698 GORDON HENDLER
FIG. 1. Egg numbers for species with discs of known Ophiolebella biscutifera, 20-Ophiomitrella clavigera, 21-
diameters. The three major developmental groups are Ophiomitrella ingrata, 23-Ophiomyxa vivipara, 24-
circled. Except for deep-sea forms, species with un- Ophionereis vivipara, 25-Ophionotus hexactis, 28-
known patterns of development are not presented. Ophioscolex nutrix, 29-Ophiotjalfa vivipara, 30-
Closed circles, viviparous. Open circles, viviparous Ophiozonella falklandica, 32-Ophiura meridionalis, 33-
(number of brooded juveniles—data for egg number Ophiura rouchi, 34-Ophiurolepis gelida, 35-Ophiurolepis
unavailable). Closed squares, abbreviated develop- martensi, 36-Stegophiura vivipara, 37-Axiognathus
ment. Open diamonds, planktotrophic development. squamatus. BROODING: 27-Ophiophycis gracilis. AB-
Crosses, deep-sea forms with unknown pattern of de- BREVIATED: 3-Amphioplus abditus, 18-Ophioderma
velopment. VIVIPAROUS: 4-Amphiura annulifera, longicaudum, 38-Ophiolepis elegans. PLANKTOTRO-
5-Amphiura capensis, 6-Amphiura magellanica, PHIC: 16-Ophiocoma echinata, 17-Ophiocoma erinaceus,
7-Amphiura microplax, 8-Amphiura monorima, 26-Ophiopholis aculeata. DEEP-SEA: l-Amphilepis ingol-
9-Amphiophiura rowetti, \0-Asterochlamys bruneus, 11- fiana, 2-Amphiophiurabullata, \2-Homalophiura tesselata,
Cryptopelta granulifera, \3-Ophiacantha densispina, 14-22-Ophiomusium lymani, 3l-Ophiura Ijungmani.
Ophiacantha vivipara, \b-Ophioceres incipiens, 19-
TOTAL NUMBER OF EGGS PER INDIVIDUAL
o
o o
o b "o
>
O1-
o
n O
CJT •o
C
0
m 5
O
pi
pi
en"
3
3
5
"0
PI
Z
OJ.
01
J
to
to
o
o
o-
o
(ft O o
o
SB
> o" X
PI
o
pi
so
01
O'
PATTERNS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOPMENT 701
limited to coastal waters. The number of (Grave, 1900; Hendler, personal observa-
arm segments of post-larvae from different tion). If egg buoyancy is an adaptation to
stations is shown in Figure 3. No clear-cut enhance dispersal it may be expected in
correlation between arm segment number other lecithotrophic forms, but it might be
(which is directly related to size and age) only an adaptation to avoid unfavorable
and location emerges from this chart, but benthic conditions where Ophioderma oc-
since it was not possible to determine the curs.
origin of any of the post-larvae, long dis- I have collected post-larvae still bearing
tance transport before metamorphosis functional ciliary bands of vitellaria larvae
cannot be ruled out. One exceptional mid- in the surface waters of the Gulf Stream (1
oceanic specimen, collected between South April 1974: 37°49.9'N, 67°56.0' Wand37°
America and Africa had the hooked arm- 48.2'N, 67° 49.1'W). This suggests that
spines characteristic of an ophiothricid. lecithotrophic ophiuroid larvae may be
FIG. 2. Total volume of eggs per individual for Stegophiura vivipara, 25-Axiognathus squamatus. AB-
species with discs of a known diameter. Only the three BREVIATED: 3-Amphioplus abditus, 13Ophioderma
major developmental groups are circled. All species longicaudum, 26-Ophiolepis elegans. PLANKTOTRO-
for which values could be calculated are shown. Cir- PHIC: W-Ophiocoma echinata, 12-Ophiocotna erinaceus,
cles, viviparous. Squares, abbreviated development. 23-Ophiopholis aculeata. DEEP-SEA: l-Amphilepis ingol-
Diamond, planktotrophic development. Crosses, fiana, 2-Amphiophiura ingolfiana, 9-Homolophiura lesse-
deep-sea forms with unknown pattern of develop- lata, 14-Ophiomusium lymani, 21 -Ophiura ljungmani.
ment. Stars, shallow-water forms with unknown pat- SHALLOW-WATER: 4-Amphioplus macilentus, b-Am-
tern of development. VIVIPAROUS: 6-Amphiophiura phioplus sp., 8-Gorgonocephalus caput-medusae, \9-Ophio-
rowetti, 7-Amphiura stimpsoni, \Q-Ophiacantha vivipara, pus arcticus, 20-Ophioscolex marionis, 23-Ophiurolepis
15-Ophionereis vivipara, \b-Ophionotus hexactis, 18- partita.
Ophiophycis gracilis, 22-Ophiura meridionalis, 24-
TABLE 4. Chronology of ophiopluteus development.
Metamorphosis
M i l l
Amphiura filiformis 3 7 Mortensen (19206)
Ophiactis balli 18 1 2 3 Mortensen (1913a)
Ophiactis savignyi 2 3 Mortensen (1931)
Ophiocoma echinata <1 2.5 6-11.5 Grave (1898),
Mortensen (1931-1)
Ophiocoma erinaceus 25-30 — 1 3-6 — 11 1 mo. Mortensen (1937),
Thorson (1946)
Ophiocoma pica 25-30 <24 — 2 6 — 18 — 1 mo. Mortensen (1937),
Thorson (1946)
Ophiocoma pumila 13 Devaney (1970)
Ophiocoma scolopendrina 25-30 — — — — 42 Mortensen (1937),
Thorson (1946)
Ophiocomina nigra — 24-30 1.5-2 — 4 9 — — 35-40 Mortensen (1913),
Narasimhamurti (1933)
Ophiomaza cacaotica 25-30 6 — — — — 5-6 — 12-14 Mortensen (1937),
Thorson (1946)
Ophiopholis aculeata 8 24-36 1.5-2 3 — 10.5 17 30 Fewk.es (1886),
Olsen (1942)
Ophiothrix angulata <1 1 2 4.5 Mortensen (1921)
Ophiothrix fragilis 24 1.5 3 4 10 23 26 MacBride (1907)
Ophiothrix quinque-
maculata 24 1.5 3 6-7 16-20 — Guille (1964)
Ophiothrix savignyi 30 0.5 1 14 21 Mortensen (1938),
Thorson (1946)
Ophiothrix triloba 0.5 >40 Mortensen (1937),
Thorson (1946)
PATTERNS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOPMENT 703
breeding periods (Hyman, 1955). Stegophi- sumed solely because adults with embryos
ura sculpta has been reported to breed from of different stages of development are
January to July. It was apparently examin- found year-round (Fell, 1946).
ed for brooded young from May to March, To show whether reproduction in A.
the only viviparous species to date to have squamatus is continuous or cyclical, it would
been effectively studied on a regular basis be most satisfactory periodically to monitor
(Murakami, 1941). gametogenesis and hatching of a discrete
Axiognathus (= Amphiura = Amphipholis) population in the field and ideally to follow
squamatus (Delle Chiaje, 1829) is a small the reproductive histories of individual
ophiuroid remarkable for its "cosmopoli- specimens. An indirect analysis of the re-
tan" distribution, simultaneous hermaph- productive periodicity of A. squamatus is
roditism, and viviparity. It has been as- presented below. It is based on size fre-
serted that widely separated populations of quency distributions of Axiognathus sam-
A. squamatus breed throughout the year al- pled monthly from September 1971 to Au-
though neither the production of gametes gust 1972. Collections were made from a
nor embryos, nor the hatching of juveniles bed of Mytilus edulis at Ram Island, Noank,
has been studied at regular intervals Connecticut (northeast Long Island
(Fewkes, 1887; MacBride, 1892; Lo Bianco, Sound), an area with little salinity variation
1899; Fell, 1946; Russel, 1957; Boffi, 1972). (29 to 31 ppt) but marked annual tempera-
Continuous gametogenesis has been as- ture fluctuation (2 to 25°C). It is assumed
704 GORDON HENDLER
PERCENT
10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
525-
E-
0.25-
OCT NOV DEC MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AU6
155 70 70 102 102 101 103 168 121
FIG. 5. Size-frequency polygons showing percentage the population brooding embryos. Dotted lines indi-
of adults of different sizes collected each month. cate the trend of growth of age classes that arise early
Shaded portions of polygons indicate the fraction of (E) and late (L) in the spawning period.
PATTERNS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOPMENT 705
individuals in this tropical population have ers and the other two groups, it is sig-
a short life-span, each adult producing a nificant that there are distinct discon-
small number of young. The relatively tinuities for direct and planktotrophic
small size of both adults and brooded ophiuroids and some of these gaps are
young supports the latter hypothesis, as filled by abbreviated forms.
does the low maximum numbers of em-
bryos for A. squamatus reported by Bom ADAPTATIONS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOPMENT
(1972) for Sao Paulo, Brazil.
As explained above, it is known that the
LIMITATIONS OF QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS young of certain viviparous ophiuroids
hatch at a larger size than planktonic post-
The results of the quantitative charac- larvae can possibly attain and most develop
terization of three primary developmental from relatively large eggs as well. Axiog-
patterns are summarized in Table 3. Indi- nathus squamatus, a small viviparous species,
FIG. 9. Arm length (top) and disc diameter (bottom) examined. Statistics for post-larvae not given because
versus the number of arm segments for planktonic samples were not quantitative and all species were
post-larvae and the viviparous embryos of Axiognathus lumped. "T" indicates forms with only terminal arm
squamatus. Bars indicate the mean and range for 328 plate. Inset figure shows silhouette of planktonic post-
brooded embryos of A. squamatus collected in May larva (white) and A. squamatus (black) with five arm
1972 in Connecticut. Points beside bars indicate size segments.
values for all North Atlantic planktonic post-larvae
Downloaded from http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/ at Ohio State University on June 9, 2014
DISC DIAMETER (mm) ARM LENGTH (mm)
. . g . . . . 5 . . .P
j—i i '—i—i—•—i—i—i—i m O en
ro
"o
ro-
JO
2*
01- a a a a •
CO
m
m
-oo-
coCO"
710 GORDON HENDLER
and it may be significant that some courages acceptance of the "gene dispersal
planktonic post-larvae with five arm seg- model" offered by Ghiselin (1969) as the
ments have longer arms (almost 2 mm) but selective agent for hermaphroditism.
discs of the same size as five arm segment Nonetheless, as Schoener (1972) mentions,
Axiognathus. Still, they settle with disc hermaphroditism is never found in non-
diameters smaller than hatching Axiog- viviparous species except in aberrant cases.
nathus. A unique planktonic post-larva with There is a considerable latitude in egg
eight arm segments had arms only about 1 size and number of embryos of viviparous
mm long, but this was more than three species (probably correlated with different
times the disc diameter. modes of embryonic nutrition). The major-
In Figure 9 there are hints of several ity of viviparous ophiuroids sacrifice the
options in post-larval adaptations. Com- advantages of a small, superabundant dis-
pared with the viviparous young of Axiog- persal stage, and may also dispense with
nathus, planktonic post-larvae may have rel- common strategies for increased reproduc-
exist. First, the increased time for de- in viviparous or abbreviated development)
velopment could result in excessive preda- and that part of the larval body may be
tion or starvation of the larval forms. This discarded during metamorphosis indicates
idea is untenable considering their toler- the ophiopluteus is an efficient energy-
ance to mass mortalities that result from the harvesting form which should be capable of
transport of ophioplutei in water masses reaching a greater size were it not for limi-
where they were spawned to areas unsuita- tations in the ophiopluteus construction.
ble for settling (Thorson, 1946; Banse,
1956; Muus, 1966; Beyer, 1968; POSSIBLE PATTERNS OF OPHIUROID DEVELOP-
Mileikovsky, 1971). If planktotrophic MENT IN THE DEEP SEA
species can survive high mortality of this
sort, then in more felicitous environments There is no direct information on
they should be able to survive the high pre- ophiuroid larvae of the continental slope or
dation associated with extended larval life. ocean basin. Only one deep-water urchin,
velopers. Based on all available data (and 1903). Evidence and the logic employed
revising Schoener's figures for viviparous have often been specious, especially the ar-
forms which are for number of brooded gument that the most common larval type is
young rather than "egg number" as writ- the most primitive.
ten) the numbers of eggs of the deep-sea Mortensen's (1921) opinions are
species exceed those of most but not all reflected in the current consensus that the
viviparous developers. The total volume of "dipleurula" is ancestral and other larvae,
eggs per individual of the deep-sea including the elegant ophioplutei, are
ophiuroids is distinct from that of plankto- specialized. Selective pressures on the lar-
trophic developers but approximates values vae leading to different forms within and
known for shallow-water species with ab- between taxonomic groups severely limit
breviated development (Figs. 1, 2). This the value of larvae in constructing
suggests that these deep-sea ophiuroids phylogenies.
have abbreviated development rather than A novel attempt has recently been made
Fewk.es, J. W. 1887. On the development of the cal- the drift of pelagic larval and juvenile stages of bot-
careous plates of Amphiura. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. tom invertebrates with marine currents in temper-
Harvard Coll. 13:108-150. ate regions. Sarsia 34:209-216.
Fontaine, F. R.,and F.-S. Chia. 1968. Echinoderms: an Mileikovsky, S. A. 1971. Types of larval development
autoradiographic study of assimilation of dissolved in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution
organic molecules. Science 161:1153-1155. and ecological significance: a re-evaluation. Mar.
Gardiner, J. S. 1904. Notes and observations on the Biol. 10:193-213.
distribution of the larvae of marine animals. Ann. Mortensen, T. 1898. Die Echinodermlarven der
Mag. Natur. Hist. 14:403-410. Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung, II, J,
Geiger, S. R. 1963. Ophiopluteus ramosus between Ice- 1-120. Verlag von Lipsius & Tischer, Kiel und Leip-
land and Newfoundland. Nature (London) zig.
198:908-909. Mortensen, T. 1901. Die Echinodermen-Larven. K.
Ghiselin, M. T. 1969. The evolution of hermaphro- Brandt's Nordisches Plankton 9; 1-34.
ditism among animals. Quart. Rev. Biol. 44:189-208. Mortensen, T. 1913a. On the development of some
Grave, C. 1898. Embryology of Ophiocoma Agassiz. British echinoderms. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 10:1-
Preliminary note. Johns Hopkins Univ. Circ. 18:6-7. 18.
Grave, C. 1900. Ophiura brevispina. Mem. Biol. Lab. Mortensen, T. 19136. Die Echinodermenlarven der