Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Petroleum Refining Equipment-1
Design of Petroleum Refining Equipment-1
By
Mohamed Samir Mostafa Kamel
Omar Mohamed Ali Elhalouty
Sherif Hussein Nasry Elbyoumy
Osama Khaled Saad
Ahmed Abd El Baset Ahmed
Page |1
Introduction:
In order to fully understand the bubble cap tray, we
must first investigate the column and tower which are
the heart of the petrochemical industry as bubble cap
tray is considered an internal of the column.
Columns are pillar-shaped vessels, which are mainly
used in the (petro) chemical industry for distillation or
the extraction of substances. They often form the key
elements in chemical or petrochemical plants. The
processes in columns often only operate at certain
temperatures.
Page |2
1) Distillation Tower Components
In a distillation tower with bubble cap trays used in the refining industry, the
various components include:
1.1. Tower Shell: The tower shell is the main cylindrical structure of the distillation
tower, typically made of steel. It provides a containment vessel for the entire
distillation process.
1.2. Bubble Caps: Bubble caps are dome-shaped caps with slots or holes. They
are placed on each tray to facilitate vapor and liquid distribution. The bubble caps
promote efficient vapor-liquid contact and help separate components based on
their boiling points.
Page |3
They allow the liquid to flow from one tray to
another, maintaining a consistent liquid flow
across the column.
1.6. Weirs: Weirs are metal barriers or dams located around the perimeter of the
tray deck. They help control the liquid flow by maintaining a specific liquid level on
the tray, preventing excessive liquid carryover, and promoting uniform liquid
distribution across the tray
1.7. Chimney Tray: The chimney tray is an additional tray located above the top
tray of the distillation column. It provides space for vapor-liquid disengagement,
allowing better separation of the vapor and liquid phases before they exit the
tower.
1.8. Overhead Vapor Outlet: The overhead vapor outlet is an opening located at
the top of the distillation tower. It allows the separated vapor to exit the tower and
proceed to further processing or condensation.
1.9. Liquid Downcomer Outlet: Each downcomer has a liquid outlet located at the
bottom of the tray. It allows the liquid to flow down to the tray below, maintaining
proper liquid flow through the tower.
1.10. Bottom Liquid Outlet: The bottom liquid outlet is located at the base of the
distillation tower. It serves as the collection point for the separated liquid, which is
then directed to further processing or storage.
Page |4
These components work together to create a series of stages or trays within the
distillation tower. The bubble caps, downcomers, vapor risers, and weirs enable
efficient vapor-liquid contact, separation, and liquid distribution. The chimney tray
aids in vapor-liquid disengagement, and the overhead vapor outlet and liquid
outlets allow for the removal and collection of separated vapor and liquid from the
tower.
Page |5
The main disadvantages are the relatively high costs for the equipment and a
higher pressure drop compared to other tray types.
There are many different types and sizes of
bubble caps. Historically, there are cast iron
types (still in use!), oval, rectangular and
round bubble caps.
Today, new bubble cap trays are usually
equipped with bubble caps with an outer cap
diameter of 2 inch, 3 inch, 4 inch or 6 inch. As
the caps are fabricated by deep drawing, the
material thickness is about 1mm. For special
materials types or thick materials, the caps
are rolled and welded.
The cap is normally bolted (double nut!) to the
riser, sometimes welded, sometimes wedged.
(It is not fun to move on the top of bubble
caps for maintenance or inspection duty.)
The caps are categorized by the top level of the gas opening and the area of the
openings (expressed by a function of the “opened” height of the slots / skirt).
The pitch of the bubble caps is important for the function of the tray: In standard
applications it is triangular and expected
to be 1.25 .. 1.5 times the cap diameter
The risers are welded or pressed in the
tray panel or gasketed by pulling the
riser flange to the tray panel.
The values of the riser area, the reversal
area, the annular gap as well as the escape area of the bubble cap have to be
balanced. As the fabrication possibilities are on the one hand confined by the riser
dimension, which is limited by the available pipe dimensions, and on the other
hand by the cap, which is restricted to the dimensions of the deep drawing tools,
you will have to find a compromise to have almost equal values for all areas.
The relative free area (riser area per active area) is typically about 5 to 10% and
the resulting total pressure drop per tray is about 8 to 12mbar. The tray spacing is
usually not less than 500mm (for large tower diameters it should be higher due to
inspection and maintenance reasons).
Page |6
2.2. The Operating Area of a bubble cap tray is defined by different limits.
Qualitative operation diagram is shown. the position and shape of all curves
depend on the physical data, the tray and cap geometry and the gas/liquid load.
Each curve can be limiting!
The Operation Point of the design case (as well as the minimum and maximum
load) has to stay inside all limiting curves. For stable operation and good efficiency
there is a useful operation area with narrower limits
Page |7
B) Jet flood FFJF:
There are several definitions in literature for the so called Jet Flood. Similar
definitions are Entrainment Flood, Massive Entrainment, Two- Phase Flood or
Priming. For practical under- standing, Jet Flood describes any liquid carried to
the tray above by the gas stream. This leads to a shortcut
recycling of the liquid with loss of tray efficiency, additional pressure drop and
additional downcomer load. For good tray performance, the Jet Flood value
should be less than 75-80%.
You can reduce Jet Flood by
a. lowering the gas velocity (higher open area, i.e. more bubble caps, higher
escape area)
b. enlarging the tray spacing
c. lowering the froth height on the tray deck (by reducing weir height or weir crest
height)
d. enlarging the active area (i.e. the gas flow area) by sloping the downcomers
C) Pressure drop:
To reduce the pressure drop of a design, you can
a. lower the gas velocity by enlarging the number of bubble caps or change their
geometry
b. lower the froth height on the tray deck (by reducing weir height or weir crest
height)
c. enlarge the active area (with place for more bubble caps) by reducing the
downcomer area or sloping the downcomers
Page |8
aeration of the liquid in the downcomer, the level has to be less than tray spacing
plus weir height.
To reduce a high Aerated Downcomer Backup value you have to
a. reduce the pressure drop of the tray (ref. to 3)
b. reduce the head loss of the clearance (use higher clearance height or radius
lips or recessed seal pans in case of insufficient sealing)
c. avoid inlet weirs
E) Pulsation:
The slots of bubble caps are opened by the gas flow. To have a stable operation,
the gas has to open all slots of all bubble caps. If there is not enough gas
(minimum slot velocity not reached), the bubble caps are pulsating. To reduce
Pulsating you have to a. change cap design (less slots, reduce width of slots) b.
reduce number of bubble caps
I) Overload caps:
At high gas loads, the space between the caps is dried - the liquid can’t enter this
region and is blown to a froth layer above the caps. This is not a recommended
and stable regime! The effect is close to the Blowing effect of sieve trays (where
the liquid layer is “disconnected” from the tray panel and blown upwards).
Therefore, the bottom skirt of the bubble cap should not be used for the gas outlet.
(In a teacup design, the skirt should not be blown totally free.)
To prevent overload of caps, you can
a. adapt the design of the caps (more slots, enlarge width of slots, higher skirt)
b. enlarge the number of caps
A) Nickel and Nickel Alloys Nickel is available in practically any millform as well
as in castings. It can be machined easily and joined by welding.
Generally, oxidizing conditions favor corrosion, while reducing conditions retard
attack. Neutral alkaline solutions, seawater, and mild atmospheric conditions do
not affect nickel. The metal is widely used for handling alkalies, particularly in
concentrating, storing, and shipping high-purity caustic soda. Chlorinated solvents
P a g e | 11
and phenol are often refined and stored in nickel to prevent product discoloration
and contamination.
B) Aluminum and Alloys Aluminum and its alloys are made in practically all
the forms in which metals are produced, including castings.
Thermal conductivity of aluminum is 60 percent of that of pure copper, and
unalloyed aluminum is used in many heat-transfer applications. Its high electrical
conductivity makes aluminum popular in electrical applications. Aluminum is one
of the most workable of metals, and it is usually joined by inert-gas-shielded arc-
welding techniques.
C) Copper and Alloys Copper and its alloys are widely used in
chemical processing, particularly when heat and electrical conductivity are
important factors. The thermal conductivity of copper is twice that of aluminum and
90 percent that of silver. A large number of copper alloys are available, including
brasses (Cu-Zn), bronzes (Cu-Sn),
cupronickels (Cu-Ni), and age-hardenable alloys such as copper beryllium (Cu-
Be) and copper nickel tin (Cu-Ni-Sn).
P a g e | 12
sulfuric to 230°C (450°F), and to all concentrations of nitric acid to the boiling
point.
Plastic polymers are materials made from organic compounds that have been
joined to form long-chain, large-molecular-weight molecules that can be easily
processed. There are two basic families of plastic polymers. Thermoplastics are a
family of polymers that can be repeatedly heated, changed in shape, then cooled
and solidified. Typical polymers within this family are polyolefins, polyvinyls, and
the fluoropolymers.
The second family of polymers is the thermosets. Unlike
the thermoplastics, these materials crosslink during initial processing and cannot
be reheated and reshaped. Upon reheating thermosets will not melt before they
reach their decomposition temperature. Thermosets are typically more rigid than
the thermoplastic polymers.
P a g e | 15
d. Multivariable Interactions: Distillation columns involve multiple interconnected
variables. Changes in one variable can affect others, leading to complex
interactions that need to be managed effectively through coordinated control
strategies.
4.6. Conclusion
Process control in distillation columns is essential for optimizing separation
efficiency, ensuring product quality, achieving energy efficiency, and maintaining
safe operation. Various control strategies, including feedback control, inferential
control, and model-based control, are employed to achieve these control
objectives. Advanced techniques, such as real-time optimization, adaptive control,
and inferential modeling, provide further opportunities for improved control
performance. However, challenges such as nonlinear behavior, model
uncertainties, time delays, and multivariable interactions must be addressed to
ensure effective control implementation.
P a g e | 16
Some of the key issues are as follows:
5. One section (for example, diesel) is flooded, while the downstream section is
dry.
Troubleshooting
P a g e | 17
Because water quickly vaporizes, causing a pressure surge and level fluctuations,
the stripping steam should be dry before use. Reduce the feed rate while
increasing the product draw-out rate from the tower.
Troubleshooting
Verify the levels at the level glasses where the problem is observed
physically. Reduce the crude heater outlet temperature or increase the product
draw-out rate to control the high-level problem.
5.3.Dry trays
The dry trays scenario is the inverse of flooding in that the trays in flooding are
filled with liquid, whereas dry trays are empty of liquid. This situation can occur
when the product withdrawal rate is greater than the amount of internal reflux and
the feed rate in the column is lower. In this case, the trays below the draw-off point
run dry, and no fractionation occurs. At the same time, there is insufficient liquid to
keep the levels in the stripper draw-off trays and side-cut strippers constant. A low-
pressure drop and low-temperature gradient will exist in the tower or section of the
tower with dry trays.
Troubleshooting
To control the dry tray issue, either reduce the product withdrawal rate or increase
the internal reflux to the column. Furthermore, by increasing the crude heater
outlet temperature or feed rate to the tower, the internal reflux can be increased.
Furthermore, the rate of the next lightest product draw-off rate can be reduced to
increase the reflux rate. The dry trays caused by superheated vapors increase the
tower's reflux rate while also lowering the feed inlet temperature.
P a g e | 18
If there is too much water in the reflux, it will upset the crude column. It will build
up on the upper trays, flooding the column.
Troubleshooting
The solution is to reduce the reflux rate, raise the tower's top temperature, and
allow the water to evaporate. Tower pressure rise can be controlled by increasing
condensation at the tower overhead system and increasing compressor capacity.
Crude tower, inlet temperature, and stripping steam can all be reduced to reduce
the vapor load on the tower, resulting in normalized pressure.
Troubleshooting
The efficient operation of crude Desalter is the solution to this problem. Restore
the Desalter's water level to normal. Increase the flow of corrosion inhibitor and
neutralizer at the tower's top. Water carryover also causes energy loss and poor
tower efficiency, which has a negative impact on product specifications.
P a g e | 19
6) Resources:
1. Seader, J. D., Henley, E. J., & Roper, D. K. (2016). Separation Process
Principles. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Luyben, W. L. (2006). Distillation Design and Control Using Aspen
Simulation. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Skogestad, S., & Skogestad, M. (2004). Multivariable dynamic control of
distillation columns. Journal of Process Control, 14(8), 883-896.
4. Shinskey, F. G. (2006). Distillation Control for Productivity and Energy
Conservation. Instrument Society of America.
5. Luyben, W. L. (1990). Ten control problems in distillation columns. AIChE
Journal, 36(10), 1519-1526.
6. Riggs, J. B., Karassik, I. J., & Perry, R. H. (2001). Perry's Chemical Engineers'
Handbook (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional.
P a g e | 20