Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document Hasan
Document Hasan
Document Hasan
Abstract
Despite significant progress in air pollution prevention and control, outdoor air
pollution remains a substantial environmental health concern for humans in recent
years. In certain developing nations, air quality concentrations far exceed the upper
limits set by the World Health Organization guidelines. Furthermore, there is a
widely accepted understanding that outdoor air pollution significantly elevates the
incidence rates of numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease, lung
cancer, respiratory issues, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and poor birth
results.
Debates persist regarding the impact of exposure to outdoor air pollution and its
underlying mechanisms. Some causal inference studies have been conducted to
investigate these scenarios, revealing that increased exposure to outdoor air
pollution directly and indirectly affects people's health. However, there is a scarcity
of research in existing literature that thoroughly examines the scope, extent, and
nature of outdoor air pollution's impact on human health outcomes. Thus, it is
imperative to pinpoint these research gaps and map the related areas of study.
Traditional methods for synthesizing knowledge, such as systematic reviews and
meta-analyses, rely on quantified data from pertinent published studies to
consolidate findings on a specific subject. These approaches also involve a formal
evaluation of study quality to draw precise conclusions concerning the targeted
research question. In contrast, a scoping review adopts a more narrative approach
to synthesizing knowledge, encompassing a broader spectrum of evidence on a
given topic. Scoping reviews systematically summarize available evidence,
including primary sources, types, and research characteristics. They tend to be
more comprehensive and beneficial for policymakers at various levels.
Objectives
Addressing outdoor air pollution is a critical objective for governments,
organizations, and communities worldwide, driven by extensive research and
evidence of its harmful impacts. Below are key objectives related to outdoor air
pollution with references to support these objectives:
4. Economic Benefits: Improving air quality can lead to economic benefits. The
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has research
on the economic implications of air pollution.
5. Regulatory Compliance: Governments and agencies set air quality standards and
regulations. For instance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
provides regulatory guidelines and references to the Clean Air Act.
Review
3. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): Emitted mainly from
combustion processes, especially in vehicles and industry, they contribute to
ground-level ozone formation and respiratory irritation.
4. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2): Arising from fossil fuel combustion, notably in power
plants and industry, it leads to respiratory problems and acid rain formation.
References
1. [World Health Organization (WHO) - Air Quality Guidelines] (https://www.
who.int/airpollution/guidelines/en/)
2. [Global Burden of Disease Study - Air Pollution](http://www.
Healthdata.org/special-analysis/ambient-air-pollution-annual-average-exposure-
and-attributable-burden-disease)
3. [United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) - Air Pollution and
Ecosystems](https://www.unep.org/resources/report/air-pollution-and-ecosystems-
damage-costs-human-well-being)
4. [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - The
Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution](https://www.oecd.org/
environment/the-economic-consequences-of-outdoor-air-pollution-
9789264257474-en.htm)
5. [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Clean Air Act](https://www.
epa.gov /laws-regulations/summary-clean-air-act)
6. [American Lung Association - Air Quality and Health](https://www.lung.
org/clean-air/outdoors/air-quality-and-health)
7. [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - Climate Change 2021:
The Physical Science Basis](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/)
8. [Environmental Science & Technology - Air Quality and Pollution Research]
(https://pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag)
9. Williams R, Brook R, Bard R, Conner T, Shin H, Burnett R. Impact of personal
and ambient-level exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter on
cardiovascular function. Int J Environ Health Res. 2012;22: 71–91.
10.1080/09603123.2011.588437 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
10. Pope C. A. III. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Associated with Outdoor Air
Pollution. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56: S41–S41. [Google Scholar]
11. Nhung NTT, Schindler C, Dien TM, Probst-Hensch N, Perez L, Kunzli N, et
al. Acute effects of ambient air pollution on lower respiratory infections in Hanoi
children: An eight-year time series study. Environ Int. Netherlands; 2018;110:
139–148. 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.024 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Goodman JE, Zu K, Loftus CT, Tao G, Liu X, Lange S. Ambient ozone and
asthma hospital admissions in Texas: a time-series analysis. Asthma Res Pract.
2017;3: 6 10.1186/s40733-017-0034-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
13. Ha S, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Nobles C, Seeni I, Sherman S, et al.
Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2018;109: 148–153. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.037 [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]