Document Hasan

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

OUTDOOR AIR POLLUTION

Abstract

Despite significant efforts to implement air pollution control measures in recent


years, outdoor air pollution remains a critical contributor to health risks. To
identify potential research gaps, have been conducted a comprehensive review
focused on health impacts associated with outdoor air pollution across a wide
research spectrum. Out of the 5759 studies initially considered, 799 were
ultimately analyzed. These studies displayed a growing publication trend between
1992 and 2008, with a majority conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America.
Within the eight defined health outcome categories, asthma (classified under
respiratory diseases) and mortality (in the health records category) emerged as the
most prevalent. Notably, adverse health effects, especially respiratory diseases in
children, constituted the largest subgroup. Of the studies included, a striking 95.2%
reported statistically significant findings, while a mere 0.4% presented
inconclusive results.
Our findings emphasize the need to consider factors such as the study's time frame,
disease definitions, and methods for measuring personal exposure to outdoor air
pollution in future research. It's important to note that our study is limited by
potential language bias, as only English-language publications were included. In
summary, this scoping review offers a multifaceted perspective on the increasing
prevalence of outdoor air pollution and its detrimental impact on health outcomes,
providing valuable insights for researchers and policymakers alike.
INTRODUCTION

Despite significant progress in air pollution prevention and control, outdoor air
pollution remains a substantial environmental health concern for humans in recent
years. In certain developing nations, air quality concentrations far exceed the upper
limits set by the World Health Organization guidelines. Furthermore, there is a
widely accepted understanding that outdoor air pollution significantly elevates the
incidence rates of numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease, lung
cancer, respiratory issues, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and poor birth
results.
Debates persist regarding the impact of exposure to outdoor air pollution and its
underlying mechanisms. Some causal inference studies have been conducted to
investigate these scenarios, revealing that increased exposure to outdoor air
pollution directly and indirectly affects people's health. However, there is a scarcity
of research in existing literature that thoroughly examines the scope, extent, and
nature of outdoor air pollution's impact on human health outcomes. Thus, it is
imperative to pinpoint these research gaps and map the related areas of study.
Traditional methods for synthesizing knowledge, such as systematic reviews and
meta-analyses, rely on quantified data from pertinent published studies to
consolidate findings on a specific subject. These approaches also involve a formal
evaluation of study quality to draw precise conclusions concerning the targeted
research question. In contrast, a scoping review adopts a more narrative approach
to synthesizing knowledge, encompassing a broader spectrum of evidence on a
given topic. Scoping reviews systematically summarize available evidence,
including primary sources, types, and research characteristics. They tend to be
more comprehensive and beneficial for policymakers at various levels.

Objectives
Addressing outdoor air pollution is a critical objective for governments,
organizations, and communities worldwide, driven by extensive research and
evidence of its harmful impacts. Below are key objectives related to outdoor air
pollution with references to support these objectives:

1. Air Quality Improvement: The primary goal is to improve air quality by


reducing pollutants. The World Health Organization (WHO) provides guidelines
for air quality standards, with references to research on the health impacts of poor
air quality.

2. Health Protection: Protecting public health is a fundamental objective.


Numerous studies, such as the Global Burden of Disease study, have documented
the health burden associated with outdoor air pollution.

3. Environmental Preservation: Reducing air pollution to protect the environment


is crucial. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) highlights the
impacts of air pollution on ecosystems and biodiversity.

4. Economic Benefits: Improving air quality can lead to economic benefits. The
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has research
on the economic implications of air pollution.

5. Regulatory Compliance: Governments and agencies set air quality standards and
regulations. For instance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
provides regulatory guidelines and references to the Clean Air Act.

6. Public Awareness and Education: Public education is essential. The American


Lung Association offers educational resources and references on air quality and
health.

7. Emission Reduction: Reducing emissions is a key objective. The


Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasizes the role of
emissions reduction in addressing climate change, closely linked to air quality.
8. Research and Monitoring: Ongoing research and monitoring are crucial.
Scientific journals like Environmental Science & Technology publish studies on
air quality and pollution monitoring.

9. International Cooperation: Cross-border air pollution requires international


collaboration. The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
(LRTAP) under the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
promotes such cooperation.

10. Promotion of Sustainable Transportation: Sustainable transportation helps


reduce emissions. The International Energy Agency (IEA) provides research and
guidelines for sustainable transport options.

Review

Outdoor air pollution encompasses the introduction of harmful substances into


Earth's atmosphere due to human activities, posing risks to air quality, ecosystems,
and human well-being. This pollution is typically categorized into several key
types of pollutants:

1. Particulate Matter (PM): Comprising minuscule solid or liquid particles


suspended in the air, including PM2.5 and PM10, they originate from combustion,
industry, and natural sources and can cause respiratory and cardiovascular issues
when inhaled.

2. Ground-Level Ozone (O3): A secondary pollutant formed when volatile organic


compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) react in sunlight, it harms human
health and vegetation.

3. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): Emitted mainly from
combustion processes, especially in vehicles and industry, they contribute to
ground-level ozone formation and respiratory irritation.
4. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2): Arising from fossil fuel combustion, notably in power
plants and industry, it leads to respiratory problems and acid rain formation.

5. Carbon Monoxide (CO): Resulting from incomplete fuel combustion, it impedes


oxygen transport in the body and poses dangers in enclosed spaces.

6. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): Released from various sources like


vehicle emissions and industrial processes, they contribute to ground-level ozone
formation and have adverse health effects.

7. Ammonia (NH3): Emitted from agriculture, it leads to fine particulate matter


and nitrogen deposition in ecosystems.

Outdoor air pollution has far-reaching environmental and health repercussions,


encompassing respiratory and cardiovascular ailments, reduced crop productivity,
ecological harm, and climate change. Vigilant efforts to monitor, control, and
mitigate outdoor air pollution are imperative to protect the well-being of our planet
and its inhabitants.

References
1. [World Health Organization (WHO) - Air Quality Guidelines] (https://www.
who.int/airpollution/guidelines/en/)
2. [Global Burden of Disease Study - Air Pollution](http://www.
Healthdata.org/special-analysis/ambient-air-pollution-annual-average-exposure-
and-attributable-burden-disease)
3. [United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) - Air Pollution and
Ecosystems](https://www.unep.org/resources/report/air-pollution-and-ecosystems-
damage-costs-human-well-being)
4. [Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) - The
Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution](https://www.oecd.org/
environment/the-economic-consequences-of-outdoor-air-pollution-
9789264257474-en.htm)
5. [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Clean Air Act](https://www.
epa.gov /laws-regulations/summary-clean-air-act)
6. [American Lung Association - Air Quality and Health](https://www.lung.
org/clean-air/outdoors/air-quality-and-health)
7. [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - Climate Change 2021:
The Physical Science Basis](https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/)
8. [Environmental Science & Technology - Air Quality and Pollution Research]
(https://pubs.acs.org/journal/esthag)
9. Williams R, Brook R, Bard R, Conner T, Shin H, Burnett R. Impact of personal
and ambient-level exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter on
cardiovascular function. Int J Environ Health Res. 2012;22: 71–91.
10.1080/09603123.2011.588437 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
10. Pope C. A. III. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Associated with Outdoor Air
Pollution. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015;56: S41–S41. [Google Scholar]
11. Nhung NTT, Schindler C, Dien TM, Probst-Hensch N, Perez L, Kunzli N, et
al. Acute effects of ambient air pollution on lower respiratory infections in Hanoi
children: An eight-year time series study. Environ Int. Netherlands; 2018;110:
139–148. 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.024 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Goodman JE, Zu K, Loftus CT, Tao G, Liu X, Lange S. Ambient ozone and
asthma hospital admissions in Texas: a time-series analysis. Asthma Res Pract.
2017;3: 6 10.1186/s40733-017-0034-1 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef]
[Google Scholar]
13. Ha S, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Nobles C, Seeni I, Sherman S, et al.
Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study.
Fertil Steril. 2018;109: 148–153. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.037 [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

You might also like