Dry Dock Checklist by Intertanko

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Standard Dry-Dock Check List

&
Risk assessment
Dragos Rauta
INTERTANKO

2019 Tripartite Meeting


18 October 2019
Tokyo

Leading the way; Making a difference


Vessel Name:
Vessel Type:
IMO Number:
Class (including Notations):
Repair (Build) yard:
Repair commencement (steel cutting) date:
Delivery date:

Criticality
VIQ #7
Item per Completed Verified Exposure
# item Timing Remarks
category by by Index
No.
(CEI)

Leading the way; Making a difference


DONE BY TIMING VERIFIED BY
yard PDT: prior dock trials Class
crew rank DDT: during dock trials Fleet superintendent
class DST: during sea trials Master
workshop PS: prior sailing Chief Engineer
service engineer

Leading the way; Making a difference


Criticality
VIQ #7 Verified
Item per category Completed by Timing REMARKS Exposure Index
item No. by
(CEI)

1 General Information

2. Certification and
2
Documentation
New Certificates / Test
Records / Receipts issued
2.1 2 PDT 1
during DD period verified to
be onboard.
Confirm Certificates /
Endorsements are correct
2.2 2 PDT 1
(forward copies to office
ASAP).

...... .............

Temporary notices, Navtex,


weather information received
4.13, 4.20,
4.6 and passage plan prepared. PS 3
4.17
ECDIS pre-departure check
list “Bridge-24” completed.
Leading the way; Making a difference
Code: F-SEE-28
SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY FORMS Issue No.: 3
Revision: 0
Vessel's Drydocking - Risk Code Date: 01/03/2018

RISK PRIORITY CODE


(C)
Risk (R) = Likelihood (L) x Consequence (C) CONSEQUENCE RATING

1-3:LOW Risk acceptable, can proceed with the task 1 2 3

Task can be scheduled, however reviewing of controls recommended


4-6:MEDIUM to reduce the risk rating
Commercial Pollution Safety

Cannot proceed with the task unless appropriate controls are taken to Damage to asset or Harm to the Human injury, health
7-12:HIGH reduce the risk financial damage environment damage or fatality

1 Very Unlikely Never occurred in the industry 1 2 3


LIKELIHOOD RATING

2 Unlikely Occurred in the industry 2 4 6


(L)

Occurred more than once in the


3 Likely industry 3 6 9

Occurred more than once in the


4 Very Likely industry & at least once in the 4 8 12
Company

Leading the way; Making a difference


IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF RISK * IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROLS FINAL RISK

(FR)
(R)
(L1) (C) REFERENCE (L2) Final Risk Risk Level
HAZARD CAUSE RESULT Risk (L1xC) Risk Level ACTION
Likelihood Consequence DOCUMENT Likelihood (L2xC)

Certification & Documentation


2
New Certificates / Test Records / Receipts issued during Humman error/ negligence. Commercial implications in Verification prior sailing that all newly issued Dry dock check list
DD period not onboard. (VIQ. 2) vessel's trading. certificates are onboard, both by Master and
2.1 2 1 2 LOW attending superintendent. 1 1 LOW

Certificates / Endorsements not correct (copies not sent Humman error/ negligence. Commercial implications in Verification prior sailing that all newly issued Dry dock check list
to office ASAP). (VIQ. 2) vessel's trading. certificates are correct, both by Master and
2.2 2 1 2 LOW attending superintendent. 1 1 LOW

VGP requirements breached / documentation not in Required inspections/ Pollution/ Commercial Verification prior sailing that each VGP required -Dry dock check list
order. Class Statement of Facts not prepared. (VIQ. 2) maintenance not carried implications in vessel's form/ certificate/ statement have been issued in -Biofouling Management Plan/
out, reports for same not trading. good order, both by Master and attending Records
issued. Items overlooked/ superintendent. All required inspections have been
VESSEL'S DRYDOCKING

forgoten. carried out to the satisfaction of the attending class


2.3 2 2 4 MEDIUM surveyor. 1 2 LOW

Class 'Factual Statement' that the Special Survey has Required inspections/ Commercial implications in Verification prior sailing that relevant statement Dry dock check list
been completed and that the ESP (Executive Hull maintenance not carried vessel's trading. issued and final report is under preparation, both
Summary & Thickness Measurements) documentation is out, reports for same not by Master and attending superintendent.
2.4 under preparation by Class head office (will be issued in issued. Items overlooked/ 2 1 2 LOW 1 1 LOW
due course) not issued. (VIQ.2) forgoten.

Class factual statement for the pressure test of piping Leakage in way of piping. Pollution hazards. Pressure test of piping performed during cargo Dry dock check list
conducted not issued. (VIQ. 2, 8.3) Report not issued, item Commercial implications in tank washing operations prior docking; repairs (as/
overlooked/ forgoten. vessel's trading. if needed affected). Verification prior sailing that
relevant statement issued, both by Master and
2.5 2 2 4 MEDIUM 1 2 LOW
attending superintendent.

Class factual statement for the ETA structural support Defect in way of underdeck ETA equipment inoperative. Supporting structure is inspected by Class Dry dock check list
members. (VIQ. 2, 9.28) supporting structure. Safety issues. Commercial surveyor and attending superntendent. Verification Class checklist
Relevant inspections not implications in vessel's prior sailing that relevant statement issued, both by
2.6 carried out and/ or reports trading. 2 3 6 MEDIUM Master and attending superintendent. 1 3 LOW
missing.

Vessel drawings, Fire/ Safety/ Emergency plans used Humman error/ negligence. Safety hazards/ routine Items landed/ handed over to the shipyard's Landing forms/ onboard checklist
during drydock period missing. Special tools, and other maintenance implications. personnel documented in relevant landing forms.
ship property not returned on board. (VIQ. 2) Master/ Chief engineer frequently updated on
2.7 3 3 9 HIGH aoutstanding items during daily safety meetings. 1 3 LOW
Final check prior sailing is performed by ship's
crew.

Leading the way; Making a difference


CONCLUSIONS

Dry-Dock Check List is a Guidance


INTERTANKO Members invited to use it and many do
Advantage to use a standard Check List
Advantage to do a Risk Assessment on work /outcome of the
Dry-Dock activity
Initiative to attempt on reducing/eliminating post DD problems
Increase confidence on problem-free post Dry Dock operation
Maybe easier to be contracted for a “post Dry Dock first cargo”

Leading the way; Making a difference


dragos.rauta@Intertanko.com

Leading the way; Making a difference

You might also like