The ability to function efficiently in a variety of cultures, such as

national, ethnic, and organizational ones, is referred to as cultural

intelligence (Ang & Van Dyne, 2008; Earley & Ang, 2003). The
growing interest in "real-world" intelligence has identified new
types of intelligence that focus on specific content domains, such
as social intelligence (Thorndike & Stein, 1937), emotional intel-
ligence (Mayer & Salovey, 1993), and practical intelligence
(Stemberg et al., 2000). CQ, like CQ, focuses on a specific
domain—intercultural settings—and is motivated by the practical
reality of workplace globalization (Earley & Aug, 2003). Following
Schmidt and Hunter's (2000) definition of general intelligence,
CQ is described as a particular form of intelligence focused on an
individual's ability to grasp and reason correctly in situations
characterized by cultural diversity. There are numerous theories
and books on cross-cultural interaction (Hofstede & Hofstede,
2004; House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004). A
significant portion of that content focuses on cultural knowledge
—understanding how cultures differ in work norms, habits, and
behaviors. Beyond this emphasis on knowledge, the cultural
intelligence approach emphasizes the importance of developing
an overall repertoire of understanding, motivation, and skills that
allows one to move in and out of a variety of cultural contexts
(Ang & Van Dyne, 2008). Cultural intelligence takes into account
the cultural, sociological, and individual dynamics that occur in
cross-cultural settings for each of us.

Individuals with high CQ can understand and navigate complex

cultural differences, according to a study by Livermore and Ang
(2018), and are thus better equipped to function in multicultural
environments. Businesses and organizations frequently operate
across borders in today's globalized world, and people with high
CQ are better suited to work with people from different cultural
backgrounds (Ang & Van Dyne, 2015).
Furthermore, it has been discovered that cultural intelligence has
a positive impact on job performance and career success.
Individuals with a high CQ can establish trust and relationships
with people from various cultural backgrounds, which can lead to
better collaboration and more successful outcomes in cross-
cultural settings (Rockstuhl et al., 2011). This is especially true
as workplaces become more diverse and multicultural. According
to a (2004) study by Earley and Mosakowski, people with high
CQ are better able to establish trust with people from other
cultural backgrounds, which improves communication and
bargaining in cross-cultural business situations. Those with high
CQ are more likely to perceive and respect cultural differences
and are better suited to handle intercultural conflicts in the
workplace, according to a (2017) study by Gelfand and
colleagues. This promotes an office environment that is
welcoming, encouraging, and supportive of achievement and
productivity. Individuals with high CQ are also more likely to have
greater cross-cultural adaptability and resilience, making them
better suited to manage cultural stress and adapt to new cultural
environments, according to research (Thomas & Inkson, 2009).
This is critical in today's globalized world, where people are
constantly exposed to new and unfamiliar cultural contexts.
Increased job performance and career success have been linked
to cultural intelligence. Individuals with high CQ have greater
leadership effectiveness in cross-cultural settings, which
translates to better job performance and career advancement,
according to a study by Rockstuhl and colleagues (2011).
Cultural intelligence has been demonstrated to be significant in
navigating cultural variety as well as having significant effects on
education and healthcare. Cultural competence in healthcare
requires both cultural intelligence and cultural competence,
according to a study by Matsumoto and colleagues (2016). Yeh
and colleagues (2018) discovered that cultural intelligence
training improved intercultural sensitivity and global awareness
among college students in their study. Promoting intercultural
understanding and global citizenship is critical in today's
increasingly interconnected world for fostering a more peaceful
and cooperative global community. Important ramifications for
foreign help and development are also provided by cultural
intelligence. In order to support effective and sustained
development projects in settings with a diversity of cultures,
Smith and colleagues' (2019) research found that cultural
intelligence is crucial. According to a study by Thomas and
colleagues (2019), those with high CQ were more likely to
appreciate and acknowledge diversity in the workplace, which led
to increased inclusion and favorable results for diverse
employees. In corporate settings, it has been discovered that CQ
is crucial for fostering diversity and inclusion (Thomas et al.,
2019). Cultural intelligence is necessary to support successful
and long-lasting development initiatives in situations with varied
cultures (Smith et al., 2019). Those with high CQ are more likely
to recognize and value local cultural customs and values, which
results in development efforts that are more successful (Smith et
al., 2019). Cultural intelligence has been found to be an
important factor in promoting intercultural understanding and
global citizenship in education (Yeh et al., 2018). CQ has been
proven to be crucial for the success of global business,
especially in cross-cultural negotiations and joint ventures (Leung
et al., 2014). Someone with cultural intelligence can interact and
work well with people from different backgrounds, which
produces better results in a variety of contexts (Thomas et al.,
2019). CQ is a crucial element of global leadership, allowing
leaders to lead diverse teams and successfully traverse cultural
barriers (Rockstuhl et al., 2011). Cultural variety is becoming
more and more relevant in all aspects of life, so having cultural
intelligence is a beneficial ability for people from all backgrounds
(Livermore, 2011). Cultural intelligence will only grow more
crucial for success in a variety of fields as our world gets more
linked and culturally varied (Matsumoto et al., 2016).
Understanding the value of hierarchy and respecting authority
figures are among the characteristics of Chinese cultural
intelligence (Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003).
Establishing guanxi, or connections and networks, is a crucial
component of Chinese culture that influences how people
conduct business and negotiate (Wang & Chang, 2012). Being
aware of the importance of face-saving and avoiding direct
conflict are two aspects of Chinese cultural intelligence
(Matsumoto, 2007). A fundamental part of Chinese culture that
influences relationships, communication, and business
encounters is the idea of mianzi, or face (Wang & Chang, 2012).
Understanding the importance of gift-giving and reciprocity in
business interactions is a component of Chinese cultural
intelligence (Wang & Chang, 2012). In Chinese culture, harmony
and collectivism are highly prized and have an impact on
communication and decision-making (Gardenswartz & Rowe,
2003). Age and seniority are significant in Chinese culture, and
it's necessary to show respect for and defer to seniors and
people with greater life experience (Matsumoto, 2007). The
Chinese notion of bao, or protection, is important and affects how
people behave in interpersonal relationships and commercial
transactions (Wang & Chang, 2012). Information is delivered and
received differently in China due to the focus placed on implicit
messaging and indirect communication (Matsumoto, 2007). For
successful commercial partnerships in Chinese culture, trust-
building and forming personal connections are essential (Wang &
Chang, 2012).
Chinese cultural intelligence, which influences behavior and
communication, places a strong emphasis on saving face and
avoiding shame (Matsumoto, 2007). Confucianism has made a
tremendous cultural impact on China and places a strong
emphasis on respect for authority, harmony, and right conduct
(Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003). A fundamental part of Chinese
culture is the idea of renqing, or responsibilities and favors, which
has an impact on interpersonal relationships and economic
procedures (Wang & Chang, 2012). Chinese culture places a
strong focus on family and community identity, which affects how
people communicate and make decisions (Gardenswartz &
Rowe, 2003). Giving and receiving feedback might be difficult in
China due to the emphasis on face-saving and indirect
communication (Matsumoto, 2007). Chinese cultural intelligence
includes a grasp of the importance of giving faces and the use of
indirect language to indicate disagreement or criticism (Wang &
Chang, 2012). Sometimes a lack of directness and clarity in
communication results from the Chinese concept of harmony and
avoiding disagreement (Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003). On the
other hand, Greeks place a high priority on hospitality and social
connections, which can be used to establish productive
commercial connections. (Mitsis & Vassiliou, 2018) Greek culture
places a high value on the idea of filotimo, or love of honor,
which can be shown through a disciplined work ethic and regard
for authority. 2014's (Tsirigotis)
Greek society places a high importance on education, especially
in subjects like history and philosophy. In Triandis (1995), Greeks
frequently communicate in an expressive, lively manner by
making meaning-conveying hand gestures and facial
expressions. (Minkov, Hofstede, & Hofstede, 2010). Meetings
may start later than expected because punctuality is not usually a
top priority in Greek society (Mitsis & Vassiliou, 2018). Greek
culture places a high focus on social harmony and communal
decision-making, emphasizing consensus building over individual
success (Triandis, 1995). Greeks tend to prioritize relationships
over transactional encounters in the workplace, placing a higher
value on trust and personal ties (Tsirigotis, 2014). Greek culture
places a lot of value on family and community, and it has a close-
knit social structure that may be used for networking and forming
connections (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010).
In domains like architecture, mathematics, and literature, the
Greeks have a long history of inventiveness and innovation
(Triandis, 1995). Greek communication relies heavily on
nonverbal indicators like eye contact and physical proximity,
which depending on the situation can either indicate respect or
disdain (Mitsis & Vassiliou, 2018). Also in Russian culture,
Important facets of Russian cultural intelligence include its
history, language, and cultural norms. While working with
Russians, it's critical to comprehend and respect these cultural
aspects (Earley & Ang, 2003). Russians place a high priority on
interpersonal connections and mutual trust in professional and
social settings. Relationship-building is crucial for productive
teamwork (Schaap & Mihailova, 2014). Russian cultural
intelligence takes into consideration communication style.
Russians may talk quietly, utilize indirect language, and lay
greater emphasis on their body language and voice tone
(Thomas & Peterson, 2017). Understanding Russian values and
beliefs requires knowledge of their history and culture. Russian
music, art, and literature may provide light on the Russian
mentality (Ponomarenko & Gudkov, 2021).
On the other hand, the importance of hospitality is strongly
emphasized in Mongol culture, thus it's crucial to greet visitors
with deference and charity (Bawden, 2013). The wants and
objectives of the collective are valued above those of the
individual in the collectivist Mongol culture. Their emphasis on
collaboration and teamwork is indicative of this (Mongol Uls
Corp, 2021). They utilize the Mongol language as a means of
expression and communication, and it is a crucial component of
their cultural identity (Humphrey, 2019). Honor and loyalty are
highly valued in Mongol culture, which is shown in their rituals
and traditions (Rossabi, 2014). The nomadic lives and customs
of the Mongol people have a long history, which has molded their
distinctive worldview and way of life (Weatherford, 2011). with
the Persians, Those with cultural intelligence should be aware of
and show reciprocity for the hospitality and respect that Persians
regard for their visitors (Mousavi, 2014). Those with cultural
intelligence should be able to comprehend and negotiate the
indirect and implicit nature of Persian culture's communication
(Gudykunst & Kim, 2003). Someone with cultural intelligence
should be able to balance and prioritize these components in
order to operate well since Persians value connections greatly
and frequently put them over job accomplishment (Fischer,
2011). And In the Sarmatian tradition, hospitality is highly valued,
and visitors are treated with the highest respect and kindness
(Pekarskiy, 2019). The nomadic Scythians had a great impact on
the civilization of the Sarmatians, who were adept horse riders
and warriors (Maksimenko, 2019). Tartars have a great feeling of
hospitality that is manifested even toward strangers and is
strongly rooted in their culture and customs (Kapoor,2016). The
Tartars put a lot of stress on the value of family and familial
connections since they believe that these bonds are essential to
forming their identity and social network (Piotrovsky,2016). In
addition to valuing education and knowledge, Tartars have
historically made significant contributions to science, philosophy,
and literature (Riasanovsky & Steinberg, 2004).
Therefore, Cultural intelligence is becoming an increasingly
important aspect in the success of individuals functioning in
South Asia's varied and ethnic milieu. The region's ethnicities,
languages, faiths, and customs combine to create a distinct and
varied cultural environment. Individuals must develop cultural
intelligence in order to effectively function and interact with
people from other cultural backgrounds. Cultural intelligence
entails the capacity to recognize, respect, and adapt to different
cultural ideas and behaviors (Earley & Ang, 2003).
Good communication is an important part of cultural intelligence
in South Asia because it allows people to transcend linguistic and
cultural boundaries and develop closer relationships with people
from diverse backgrounds. Individuals must be conscious of their
own communication style and adjust it to meet the demands of
the target audience (Dasgupta & Adhikari, 2019). Adaptation to
varied cultural contexts: Cultural intelligence in South Asia
necessitates the ability to adapt to multiple cultural contexts and
be at ease working in a variety of settings. This entails being
adaptive and flexible in one's approach, as well as being
prepared to learn and embrace new cultural traditions and
conventions (Thomas & Inkson, 2009). In conclusion lastly,
cultural intelligence in South Asia necessitates people's
commitment to continual learning and growth, as well as
investment in expanding their knowledge and abilities in this
 area. This entails looking for fresh experiences and opportunities
to learn from individuals from other backgrounds and viewpoints
(Thomas & Inkson, 2009).

References:

Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2015). Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory,
Measurement, and Applications. Routledge.

Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural Intelligence. Harvard Business Review,
82(10), 139-146.

Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2017). Cross-cultural organizational behavior.
Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 119-142.

Leung, A. K.-y., & Lee, S. (2019). Cultural intelligence and innovation: A review. Journal
of Business Research, 98, 365-380.

Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general
intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ)
on cross-border leadership

Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Skinner, L. J. (2016). Cultural intelligence in

healthcare: individual and organizational implications. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.),
Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications (pp. 325-
341). Routledge.
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomas, D. C. (2019). Cultural intelligence: A review,
reflections, and recommendations for future research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The
Nature of Intelligence (pp. 463-482). Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, D. A., O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2019). Cultural intelligence, inclusion,
and innovation. In D. V. Day & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA Handbook of Diversity and
Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 345-360). American Psychological Association.

Yeh, C. J., Kim, A. B., Pituc, S. T., Atkins, M. S., & Liang, J. (2018). Cultural intelligence
and global citizenship among college students: A multigroup analysis. Journal of
College Student Development, 59(1), 97-113.

Cleveland, M., & Laroche, M. (2007). Acculturating to consumption: A study of the

consumption values and practices of Chinese immigrants to Canada. Journal of
Business Research, 60(3), 277-284.

Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (2003). Managing diversity: A complete desk reference
and planning guide. McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations:
Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.

Tsirigotis, C. (2014). Business Culture in Greece. CultureSmart! The Essential Guide to

Customs & Culture. Kuperard.
Vassiliou, A., & Mitsis, F. (2018). Cultural intelligence in Greece. In R. Y. Bourhis & J.
Barrette (Eds.), The Psychology of Ethnic and Cultural Conflict: Strategies for
Successful Multicultural Interaction (pp. 141-152). Springer International Publishing.

Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across
cultures. Stanford University Press.

Schaap, H., & Mihailova, I. (2014). Understanding the Russian business culture. In
Doing business with Russia (pp. 25-43). Palgrave Macmillan.

Thomas, D. C., & Peterson, M. F. (2017). Cross-cultural management: Essential

concepts. Sage Publications.

Ponomarenko, E., & Gudkov, A. (2021). Exploring Russian mentality and culture
through literature, music, and art. International Journal of Russian Studies, 10(1), 59-78.

Golubeva, N. V., & Gerasimova, A. O. (2018). Features of decision-making in Russian

business culture. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,
11(4), 475-485.

Bawden, C. R. (2013). The modern history of Mongolia. Routledge.

Humphrey, C. (2019). The Mongolian language and cultural identity. In Language,

Identity and Education (pp. 217-232). Springer.

Mongol Uls Corp. (2021). Mongolian culture. Retrieved from

https://www.mongoluls.net/culture

Rossabi, M. (2014). The Mongols: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Weatherford, J. M. (2011). The secret history of the Mongol queens: How the daughters
of Genghis Khan rescued his empire. Crown Publishers.

Mousavi, S. A. (2014). The Iranian cultural and social factors affecting cross-cultural
communication. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 315-321.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to
intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill.

Fischer, R. (2011). Iranian culture and Muslim culture: a comparative study based on
Hofstede’s value dimensions. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2),
204.

Pekarskiy, O. (2019). The Ancient Sarmatians: A Forgotten Culture in the Eurasian

Steppe. Journal of History Research, 11(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5539/jhr.v11n1p86

Maksimenko, S. (2019). Sarmatians. In J. H. Johnson (Ed.), The International

Encyclopedia of Crime, Justice and Social Control (pp. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbiejcs010

Kapoor, A. (2016). The Tartars: Nomads of Eurasia. New York: Routledge.

Piotrovsky, M. B. (2016). The Tartar epic: Folktales and legends from the Middle Volga.
New York: Routledge.

Riasanovsky, N. V., & Steinberg, M. D. (2004). A history of Russia. New York: Oxford
University Press.

Dasgupta, S., & Adhikari, A. (2019). Cultural Intelligence and Effective Communication
in South Asia: An Exploratory Study. Journal of International Business and Cultural
Studies, 12, 1-13.

Thomas, D. C., & Inkson, K. (2009). Cultural Intelligence: People Skills for Global
Business. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.