The ability to function efficiently in a variety of cultures, such as

national, ethnic, and organizational ones, is referred to as cultural

intelligence (Ang & Van Dyne, 2008; Earley & Ang, 2003). The
growing interest in "real-world" intelligence has identified new types of
intelligence that focus on specific content domains, such as social
intelligence (Thorndike & Stein, 1937), emotional intel- ligence (Mayer
& Salovey, 1993), and practical intelligence (Stemberg et al., 2000).
CQ, like CQ, focuses on a specific domain—intercultural settings—and
is motivated by the practical reality of workplace globalization (Earley
& Aug, 2003). Following Schmidt and Hunter's (2000) definition of
general intelligence, CQ is described as a particular form of intelligence
focused on an individual's ability to grasp and reason correctly in
situations characterized by cultural diversity. There are numerous
theories and books on cross-cultural interaction (Hofstede & Hofstede,
2004; House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004). A significant
portion of that content focuses on cultural knowledge—understanding
how cultures differ in work norms, habits, and behaviors. Beyond this
emphasis on knowledge, the cultural intelligence approach emphasizes
the importance of developing an overall repertoire of understanding,
motivation, and skills that allows one to move in and out of a variety of
cultural contexts (Ang & Van Dyne, 2008). Cultural intelligence takes
into account the cultural, sociological, and individual dynamics that
occur in cross-cultural settings for each of us.

Individuals with high CQ can understand and navigate complex cultural

differences, according to a study by Livermore and Ang (2018), and are
thus better equipped to function in multicultural environments.
Businesses and organizations frequently operate across borders in
today's globalized world, and people with high CQ are better suited to
work with people from different cultural backgrounds (Ang & Van
Dyne, 2015).
Furthermore, it has been discovered that cultural intelligence has a
positive impact on job performance and career success. Individuals with
a high CQ can establish trust and relationships with people from various
cultural backgrounds, which can lead to better collaboration and more
successful outcomes in cross-cultural settings (Rockstuhl et al., 2011).
This is especially true as workplaces become more diverse and
multicultural. According to a (2004) study by Earley and Mosakowski,
people with high CQ are better able to establish trust with people from
other cultural backgrounds, which improves communication and
bargaining in cross-cultural business situations. Those with high CQ are
more likely to perceive and respect cultural differences and are better
suited to handle intercultural conflicts in the workplace, according to a
(2017) study by Gelfand and colleagues. This promotes an office
environment that is welcoming, encouraging, and supportive of
achievement and productivity. Individuals with high CQ are also more
likely to have greater cross-cultural adaptability and resilience, making
them better suited to manage cultural stress and adapt to new cultural
environments, according to research (Thomas & Inkson, 2009). This is
critical in today's globalized world, where people are constantly
exposed to new and unfamiliar cultural contexts. Increased job
performance and career success have been linked to cultural
intelligence. Individuals with high CQ have greater leadership
effectiveness in cross-cultural settings, which translates to better job
performance and career advancement, according to a study by
Rockstuhl and colleagues (2011). Cultural intelligence has been
demonstrated to be significant in navigating cultural variety as well as
having significant effects on education and healthcare. Cultural
competence in healthcare requires both cultural intelligence and cultural
competence, according to a study by Matsumoto and colleagues (2016).
Yeh and colleagues (2018) discovered that cultural intelligence training
improved intercultural sensitivity and global awareness among college
students in their study. Promoting intercultural understanding and
global citizenship is critical in today's increasingly interconnected
world for fostering a more peaceful and cooperative global community.
Important ramifications for foreign help and development are also
provided by cultural intelligence. In order to support effective and
sustained development projects in settings with a diversity of cultures,
Smith and colleagues' (2019) research found that cultural intelligence is
crucial. According to a study by Thomas and colleagues (2019), those
with high CQ were more likely to appreciate and acknowledge diversity
in the workplace, which led to increased inclusion and favorable results
for diverse employees. In corporate settings, it has been discovered that
CQ is crucial for fostering diversity and inclusion (Thomas et al.,
2019). Cultural intelligence is necessary to support successful and long-
lasting development initiatives in situations with varied cultures (Smith
et al., 2019). Those with high CQ are more likely to recognize and
value local cultural customs and values, which results in development
efforts that are more successful (Smith et al., 2019). Cultural
intelligence has been found to be an important factor in promoting
intercultural understanding and global citizenship in education (Yeh et
al., 2018). CQ has been proven to be crucial for the success of global
business, especially in cross-cultural negotiations and joint ventures
(Leung et al., 2014). Someone with cultural intelligence can interact
and work well with people from different backgrounds, which produces
better results in a variety of contexts (Thomas et al., 2019). CQ is a
crucial element of global leadership, allowing leaders to lead diverse
teams and successfully traverse cultural barriers (Rockstuhl et al.,
2011). Cultural variety is becoming more and more relevant in all
aspects of life, so having cultural intelligence is a beneficial ability for
people from all backgrounds (Livermore, 2011). Cultural intelligence
will only grow more crucial for success in a variety of fields as our
world gets more linked and culturally varied (Matsumoto et al., 2016).
Understanding the value of hierarchy and respecting authority figures
are among the characteristics of Chinese cultural intelligence
(Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003).
Establishing guanxi, or connections and networks, is a crucial
component of Chinese culture that influences how people conduct
business and negotiate (Wang & Chang, 2012). Being aware of the
importance of face-saving and avoiding direct conflict are two aspects
of Chinese cultural intelligence (Matsumoto, 2007). A fundamental part
of Chinese culture that influences relationships, communication, and
business encounters is the idea of mianzi, or face (Wang & Chang,
2012). Understanding the importance of gift-giving and reciprocity in
business interactions is a component of Chinese cultural intelligence
(Wang & Chang, 2012). In Chinese culture, harmony and collectivism
are highly prized and have an impact on communication and decision-
making (Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003). Age and seniority are
significant in Chinese culture, and it's necessary to show respect for and
defer to seniors and people with greater life experience (Matsumoto,
2007). The Chinese notion of bao, or protection, is important and
affects how people behave in interpersonal relationships and
commercial transactions (Wang & Chang, 2012). Information is
delivered and received differently in China due to the focus placed on
implicit messaging and indirect communication (Matsumoto, 2007). For
successful commercial partnerships in Chinese culture, trust-building
and forming personal connections are essential (Wang & Chang, 2012).
Chinese cultural intelligence, which influences behavior and
communication, places a strong emphasis on saving face and avoiding
shame (Matsumoto, 2007). Confucianism has made a tremendous
cultural impact on China and places a strong emphasis on respect for
authority, harmony, and right conduct (Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003).
A fundamental part of Chinese culture is the idea of renqing, or
responsibilities and favors, which has an impact on interpersonal
relationships and economic procedures (Wang & Chang, 2012).
Chinese culture places a strong focus on family and community
identity, which affects how people communicate and make decisions
(Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003). Giving and receiving feedback might be
difficult in China due to the emphasis on face-saving and indirect
communication (Matsumoto, 2007). Chinese cultural intelligence
includes a grasp of the importance of giving faces and the use of
indirect language to indicate disagreement or criticism (Wang & Chang,
2012). Sometimes a lack of directness and clarity in communication
results from the Chinese concept of harmony and avoiding
disagreement (Gardenswartz & Rowe, 2003). On the other hand,
Greeks place a high priority on hospitality and social connections,
which can be used to establish productive commercial connections.
(Mitsis & Vassiliou, 2018) Greek culture places a high value on the
idea of filotimo, or love of honor, which can be shown through a
disciplined work ethic and regard for authority. 2014's (Tsirigotis)
Greek society places a high importance on education, especially in
subjects like history and philosophy. In Triandis (1995), Greeks
frequently communicate in an expressive, lively manner by making
meaning-conveying hand gestures and facial expressions. (Minkov,
Hofstede, & Hofstede, 2010). Meetings may start later than expected
because punctuality is not usually a top priority in Greek society (Mitsis
& Vassiliou, 2018). Greek culture places a high focus on social
harmony and communal decision-making, emphasizing consensus
building over individual success (Triandis, 1995). Greeks tend to
prioritize relationships over transactional encounters in the workplace,
placing a higher value on trust and personal ties (Tsirigotis, 2014).
Greek culture places a lot of value on family and community, and it has
a close-knit social structure that may be used for networking and
forming connections (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010).
In domains like architecture, mathematics, and literature, the Greeks
have a long history of inventiveness and innovation (Triandis, 1995).
Greek communication relies heavily on nonverbal indicators like eye
contact and physical proximity, which depending on the situation can
either indicate respect or disdain (Mitsis & Vassiliou, 2018). Also in
Russian culture, Important facets of Russian cultural intelligence
include its history, language, and cultural norms. While working with
Russians, it's critical to comprehend and respect these cultural aspects
(Earley & Ang, 2003). Russians place a high priority on interpersonal
connections and mutual trust in professional and social settings.
Relationship-building is crucial for productive teamwork (Schaap &
Mihailova, 2014). Russian cultural intelligence takes into consideration
communication style. Russians may talk quietly, utilize indirect
language, and lay greater emphasis on their body language and voice
tone (Thomas & Peterson, 2017). Understanding Russian values and
beliefs requires knowledge of their history and culture. Russian music,
art, and literature may provide light on the Russian mentality
(Ponomarenko & Gudkov, 2021).
On the other hand, the importance of hospitality is strongly emphasized
in Mongol culture, thus it's crucial to greet visitors with deference and
charity (Bawden, 2013). The wants and objectives of the collective are
valued above those of the individual in the collectivist Mongol culture.
Their emphasis on collaboration and teamwork is indicative of this
(Mongol Uls Corp, 2021). They utilize the Mongol language as a means
of expression and communication, and it is a crucial component of their
cultural identity (Humphrey, 2019). Honor and loyalty are highly
valued in Mongol culture, which is shown in their rituals and traditions
(Rossabi, 2014). The nomadic lives and customs of the Mongol people
have a long history, which has molded their distinctive worldview and
way of life (Weatherford, 2011). with the Persians, Those with cultural
intelligence should be aware of and show reciprocity for the hospitality
and respect that Persians regard for their visitors (Mousavi, 2014).
Those with cultural intelligence should be able to comprehend and
negotiate the indirect and implicit nature of Persian culture's
communication (Gudykunst & Kim, 2003). Someone with cultural
intelligence should be able to balance and prioritize these components
in order to operate well since Persians value connections greatly and
frequently put them over job accomplishment (Fischer, 2011). And In
the Sarmatian tradition, hospitality is highly valued, and visitors are
treated with the highest respect and kindness (Pekarskiy, 2019). The
nomadic Scythians had a great impact on the civilization of the
Sarmatians, who were adept horse riders and warriors (Maksimenko,
2019). Tartars have a great feeling of hospitality that is manifested even
toward strangers and is strongly rooted in their culture and customs
(Kapoor,2016). The Tartars put a lot of stress on the value of family and
familial connections since they believe that these bonds are essential to
forming their identity and social network (Piotrovsky,2016). In addition
to valuing education and knowledge, Tartars have historically made
significant contributions to science, philosophy, and literature
(Riasanovsky & Steinberg, 2004).
Therefore, Cultural intelligence is becoming an increasingly important
aspect in the success of individuals functioning in South Asia's varied
and ethnic milieu. The region's ethnicities, languages, faiths, and
customs combine to create a distinct and varied cultural environment.
Individuals must develop cultural intelligence in order to effectively
function and interact with people from other cultural backgrounds.
Cultural intelligence entails the capacity to recognize, respect, and
adapt to different cultural ideas and behaviors (Earley & Ang, 2003).
Good communication is an important part of cultural intelligence in
South Asia because it allows people to transcend linguistic and cultural
boundaries and develop closer relationships with people from diverse
backgrounds. Individuals must be conscious of their own
communication style and adjust it to meet the demands of the target
 audience (Dasgupta & Adhikari, 2019). Adaptation to varied cultural
contexts: Cultural intelligence in South Asia necessitates the ability to
adapt to multiple cultural contexts and be at ease working in a variety of
settings. This entails being adaptive and flexible in one's approach, as
well as being prepared to learn and embrace new cultural traditions and
conventions (Thomas & Inkson, 2009). In conclusion lastly, cultural
intelligence in South Asia necessitates people's commitment to
continual learning and growth, as well as investment in expanding their
knowledge and abilities in this area. This entails looking for fresh
experiences and opportunities to learn from individuals from other
backgrounds and viewpoints (Thomas & Inkson, 2009).

References:

Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2015). Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and
Applications. Routledge.

Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2004). Cultural Intelligence. Harvard Business Review,
82(10), 139-146.

Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2017). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual
Review of Psychology, 68, 119-142.

Leung, A. K.-y., & Lee, S. (2019). Cultural intelligence and innovation: A review. Journal of
Business Research, 98, 365-380.
Rockstuhl, T., Seiler, S., Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., & Annen, H. (2011). Beyond general
intelligence (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ): The role of cultural intelligence (CQ) on
cross-border leadership

Matsumoto, D., Hwang, H. C., & Skinner, L. J. (2016). Cultural intelligence in healthcare:
individual and organizational implications. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of
Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications (pp. 325-341). Routledge.

Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomas, D. C. (2019). Cultural intelligence: A review,
reflections, and recommendations for future research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of
Intelligence (pp. 463-482). Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, D. A., O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2019). Cultural intelligence, inclusion, and
innovation. In D. V. Day & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA Handbook of Diversity and Psychology
(Vol. 1, pp. 345-360). American Psychological Association.

Yeh, C. J., Kim, A. B., Pituc, S. T., Atkins, M. S., & Liang, J. (2018). Cultural intelligence and
global citizenship among college students: A multigroup analysis. Journal of College Student
Development, 59(1), 97-113.

Cleveland, M., & Laroche, M. (2007). Acculturating to consumption: A study of the

consumption values and practices of Chinese immigrants to Canada. Journal of Business
Research, 60(3), 277-284.

Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (2003). Managing diversity: A complete desk reference and
planning guide. McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the
Mind. McGraw-Hill.

Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.

Tsirigotis, C. (2014). Business Culture in Greece. CultureSmart! The Essential Guide to Customs
& Culture. Kuperard.

Vassiliou, A., & Mitsis, F. (2018). Cultural intelligence in Greece. In R. Y. Bourhis & J. Barrette
(Eds.), The Psychology of Ethnic and Cultural Conflict: Strategies for Successful Multicultural
Interaction (pp. 141-152). Springer International Publishing.

Earley, P. C., & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures.
Stanford University Press.

Schaap, H., & Mihailova, I. (2014). Understanding the Russian business culture. In Doing
business with Russia (pp. 25-43). Palgrave Macmillan.

Thomas, D. C., & Peterson, M. F. (2017). Cross-cultural management: Essential concepts. Sage
Publications.

Ponomarenko, E., & Gudkov, A. (2021). Exploring Russian mentality and culture through
literature, music, and art. International Journal of Russian Studies, 10(1), 59-78.

Golubeva, N. V., & Gerasimova, A. O. (2018). Features of decision-making in Russian business

culture. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(4), 475-485.

Bawden, C. R. (2013). The modern history of Mongolia. Routledge.

Humphrey, C. (2019). The Mongolian language and cultural identity. In Language, Identity and
Education (pp. 217-232). Springer.
Mongol Uls Corp. (2021). Mongolian culture. Retrieved from https://www.mongoluls.net/culture

Rossabi, M. (2014). The Mongols: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Weatherford, J. M. (2011). The secret history of the Mongol queens: How the daughters of
Genghis Khan rescued his empire. Crown Publishers.

Mousavi, S. A. (2014). The Iranian cultural and social factors affecting cross-cultural
communication. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 315-321.

Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to

intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill.

Fischer, R. (2011). Iranian culture and Muslim culture: a comparative study based on Hofstede’s
value dimensions. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 204.

Pekarskiy, O. (2019). The Ancient Sarmatians: A Forgotten Culture in the Eurasian Steppe.
Journal of History Research, 11(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5539/jhr.v11n1p86

Maksimenko, S. (2019). Sarmatians. In J. H. Johnson (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of

Crime, Justice and Social Control (pp. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbiejcs010

Kapoor, A. (2016). The Tartars: Nomads of Eurasia. New York: Routledge.

Piotrovsky, M. B. (2016). The Tartar epic: Folktales and legends from the Middle Volga. New
York: Routledge.

Riasanovsky, N. V., & Steinberg, M. D. (2004). A history of Russia. New York: Oxford
University Press.

Dasgupta, S., & Adhikari, A. (2019). Cultural Intelligence and Effective Communication in
South Asia: An Exploratory Study. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies, 12, 1-
13.

Thomas, D. C., & Inkson, K. (2009). Cultural Intelligence: People Skills for Global Business.
Berrett-Koehler Publishers.