The document contains a table of specifications for a mathematics assessment covering learning competencies related to measures of position. The table lists 6 learning competencies, the item format and cognitive domain for each, and the number of items and days allocated. It shows most items are multiple choice, assessing comprehension, application and analysis. The table allocates over a third of the items and days to a research proposal assessing synthesis and evaluation.
The document contains a table of specifications for a mathematics assessment covering learning competencies related to measures of position. The table lists 6 learning competencies, the item format and cognitive domain for each, and the number of items and days allocated. It shows most items are multiple choice, assessing comprehension, application and analysis. The table allocates over a third of the items and days to a research proposal assessing synthesis and evaluation.
The document contains a table of specifications for a mathematics assessment covering learning competencies related to measures of position. The table lists 6 learning competencies, the item format and cognitive domain for each, and the number of items and days allocated. It shows most items are multiple choice, assessing comprehension, application and analysis. The table allocates over a third of the items and days to a research proposal assessing synthesis and evaluation.
The document contains a table of specifications for a mathematics assessment covering learning competencies related to measures of position. The table lists 6 learning competencies, the item format and cognitive domain for each, and the number of items and days allocated. It shows most items are multiple choice, assessing comprehension, application and analysis. The table allocates over a third of the items and days to a research proposal assessing synthesis and evaluation.
Table of Specifications in Mathematics 10 - Quarter 4
Learning Competencies Item Format No. No. Percent
Used of of of Item Placement Under Each Cognitive Days Items Items Domain Kno Com App Ana Syn Eva 1. Illustrates the Identification 3 5 7.5 31-35 following measures of position: quartiles, deciles and percentiles. 2. Calculates a Multiple 5 5 12.5 6,7,8, specified measure Choice 9,10 of position (e.g., 90th percentile) of a set of data. 3. Interprets Multiple 4 5 10 1,2,3, measures of Choice 4,5 position. 4. Solves problems Multiple 5 10 12.5 11-20 involving Choice measures of positions. 5. Formulates Research 15 15 37.5 36-50 statistical mini- Proposal research. 6. Uses appropriate Multiple 8 10 20 21-30 measures of Choice position and other statistical methods in analyzing and interpreting research data.
Total 40 50 100% 10 25 15
Formula: % of item = specific number of days divided by total number of days times 100
No. of items = % of items x total number of items
NAME: JAY WARD Q. ARGABES YEAR & 2ND yr. BACHELOR OF SECONDARY COURSE: EDUCATION MAJOR IN MATHEMATICS TASK: CATEGORIZATION OF ASSIGNED SCHEDULE: TTH 9:00 – 10:30 AM, ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING COMPETENCIES LEARNING 1
LEARNING COMPETENCY CATEGORIZATION (ANSWER)
7. Illustrates the following measures of COMPREHENSION (Bloom`s Taxonomy in 1956)
position: quartiles, deciles and percentiles. UNDERSTANDING (Anderson/Krathwolh`s Revision in 2001) (Gabuyo, 2012 p. 25) 8. Calculates a specified measure of position APPLICATION (Bloom`s Taxonomy in 1956) (e.g., 90th percentile) of a set of data. APPLYING (Anderson/Krathwolh`s Revision in 2001) (Gabuyo, 2012 p. 25) 9. Interprets measures of position. COMPREHENSION (Bloom`s Taxonomy in 1956) UNDERSTANDING (Anderson/Krathwolh`s Revision in 2001) (Gabuyo, 2012 p. 25) 10. Solves problems involving measures of APPLICATION (Asaad, 2004 p. 116) positions.
11. Formulates statistical mini-research. SYNTHESIS (Bloom`s Taxonomy in 1956)
EVALUATING (Anderson/Krathwolh`s Revision in 2001) (Gabuyo, 2012 p. 26) 12. Uses appropriate measures of position and APPLICATION (Bloom`s Taxonomy in 1956) other statistical methods in analyzing and APPLYING (Anderson/Krathwolh`s Revision in 2001) interpreting research data. (Gabuyo, 2012 p. 25)