Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Blondy
Blondy
Blondy
Pierre Blondy
XLIM
CNRS - Universite de Limoges
123, Avenue Albert Thomas
87060 Limoges Cedex France
Contents
1
2 CONTENTS
4 Contact Physics 37
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.2 Contact forces on a parallel plate actuator . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.3 Pressure on a contact point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.4 The Hertz contact model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.5 Multiple Contact Points Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.6 Contact Supertemperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Chapter 1
1.1 Introduction
RF switches are very common components used for routing and controlling
RF signals in most Rf systems. They can be found in most microwave and
RF systems from Vector Network Analyzers to Cellular Phones, including
satellite payloads, radar systems and antennas. RF switches are very basic
components
1.2 Definitions
The perfect switch
An electrical switch is shown below:
It is basically a device that connects two wires together, upon an external
actuation. The connection in the closed state is perfect and the switch
isolation in the open state is infinite.
In real life however, the switch is not perfect, and in the open state,
there exists a series capacitance, that we will call the up state capacitance,
Cof f , leading to a series impedance of the switch Zof f .
In the closed state, that we will call the down state, there is series
resistance, Ron , due to the physical contact between the two metallic parts
of the switch. This resistance gives a series impedance Zon . There exists a
frequency, for which the moduli of Zof f and Zon are equal. This frequency is
called the cutoff frequency, fc of a switch, and corresponds to the frequency
3
4 CHAPTER 1. RF SWITCHES AND SWITCHED VARACTORS
Cup Ron
Zup=1/(jCup!) Zdown=Ron
1
mod(Zof f ) = = Ron (1.1)
2πCof f f
1
fc = (1.2)
2πCof f Ron
The best semi conductor switches have cutoff frequencies about 1-2 THz,
while MEMS switches have cutoff frequencies between 50-60 THz. It means
that the only figure that matters to define switch performances is the con-
trast between the up and down states. Then, if one needs a specific contact
resistance or a given isolation, then series or parallel arrangements are giv-
ing the same cutoff frequency. Specifically, for a given switch technology, a
designer will trade isolation for low loss and vice-versa.
In the case of capacitive switches, the contrast between the two states
is more depending on the contrast that exists between the up and down
states of the capacitance. The series resistance, Rs , is still there, and does
not change between the up and down states.
The ratio between the two impedances Zof f and Zon , is linked to the
capacitance ratio, Cof f and Con , since Rs is usually very small (a few mil-
liOhms) compared to the capacitance impedance.
1.3. OHMIC CONTACT SWITCHES 5
Rs Cup Rs Con
Zup=Rs+1/(jCup!) Zdown=Rs+1/(jCon!)
Series Switches
V>Vp
Series switches are among the most popular components in the area of
RF-MEMS, since they can replace diode and also conventional relays. The
6 CHAPTER 1. RF SWITCHES AND SWITCHED VARACTORS
devices are similar in many ways to the ideal relays that are shown in figure
1.4.
The insertion loss caused by a resistance on a 50 Ω line in series on a
MEMS switch is given by:
2Z0
S21 = (1.3)
2Z0 + Rs
The insertion loss can be computed using a very simple rule of thumb:
on a 50 Ohms line, the insertion loss of a MEMS switch is given by the
following formula:
Application example 1
Let us consider the series switch depicted below:
Input! Output!
• Compute the off state capacitance. (Use the parallel plate approxi-
mation to compute the capacitance)
Application example 2
A MEMS switch has 0.4 dB insertion loss, and a measured isolation of 30 dB
at 2 GHz.
• The contact surface is 10x10 µm. Compute the contact gap height.
Shunt Switches
Shunt contact switches can have in theory a very large isolation, since the
off state is dominated by the value of the resistance in the down state. Such
device is inherently wideband, but limited by the inductance of the device.
Cup
Ron
A shunt switch in the down state isolation is shown below, for various
values of the resistances. The isolation is given by the equation below:
2Ron
S21 = (1.6)
Z0
We can see that the isolation is independent of frequency, if only the
contact resistance is considered.
When the series inductance is considered, the isolation is dramatically
reduced, and even a small inductance strongly reduces the isolation.
8 CHAPTER 1. RF SWITCHES AND SWITCHED VARACTORS
'"#
16 !"
8 !"
'$# 4 !"
2 !"
3 /4 5+56,7,+8
'%# 1 !"
0.5 !"
'&#
'!#
'(#
')#
# ! "# "! $# $! %# %! &#
*+,-./0 12
Cup
Ron
Figure 1.7: Equivalent scheme the switch when a small inductance is con-
sidered
#
L=0.1 nH!
'"#
'&#
Ron= 1"!
'!#
'(#
')#
# ! "# "! $# $! %# %! &#
*+,-./0 12
Figure 1.8: Simulated isolation of the switch in the down state, when a
small inductance is considered
Air bridge!
Ground!
Signal!
Ground!
V
Substrate
Signal line
V>Vp
Zo, !, l Zo, !, l
L
Cup in the up state
Cmems
Cdown in the down state
Rs
Frequency Frequency
S11 dB
S11 dB
Up State Down State
In the down state, the switch shunts microwave signals to the ground,
and the isolation is increased with frequency. The transmission coefficient
S21 evolution versus frequency is shown below:
fr Frequency fr Frequency
S21 dB
S21 dB
S21 min
fr is given by:
1
fr = √ (1.8)
2π LCdown
And the maximum isolation is given by:
2Rs
S21 min = (1.9)
Z0
12 CHAPTER 1. RF SWITCHES AND SWITCHED VARACTORS
2
S21 (f ) = (1.10)
2πf Cdown Z0
This equation is valid if f << fr .
The resonance is commonly being used to design switches with a large
isolation at a given frequency with a specific capacitance. It is therefore
possible to design the device so that L and Cmems are giving a maximum
isolation for the proposed frequency.
Series Switches
Series switches are the most common implementation in electric circuits,
however, using a variable capacitance to allow signals to pass through the
transmission lines requires high contrasts and low loss.
An isometric 3D view of the switch can be seen on fig. 1.14
Cantilever beam!
Input! Output!
1
S11 = (1.12)
2Z0 Cdown ω
1.4. MICROWAVE CAPACITIVE SWITCHES 13
V>Vp
RF In! RF Out!
Frequency Frequency
S11 dB
S11 dB
Frequency Frequency
S21 dB
S21 dB
Up State Down State
N Bits arrangements
Analog variable devices are difficult to fabricate and integrate in practice
inside a microwave circuit. The preferred approach is to use RF-MEMS ar-
rays of devices that can be used as building blocks for multibit arrangements
of variable capacitance. The array is based on the use of a single switched
device, very similar to the series capacitive switch shown above. For an par-
allel array arragement, the total value of the capacitance is nCmems , Cmems
being either Cup or Cdown , n the number of capacitors. The values of such
an array are bounded by the on/off ratio of the elementary capacitance.
Q factor
Let us consider the electrical scheme below:
Stored Energy
Q=ω (1.13)
Average Dissipated P ower
1.5. SWITCHED VARACTORS 15
V
I
C R
Q becomes:
1
2
CV 2
Q=ω1 (1.14)
2
RV 2 C 2 ω 2
Which simplifies to the well-known formula:
1
Q= (1.15)
RCω
The case of two lossy capacitors in parallel can be studied following the
same approach:
1
2
(C1 + C2 )V 2
Q=ω1 2C 2ω2 + 1 R V 2C 2ω2
(1.16)
2
R1 V 1 2 2 2
16 CHAPTER 1. RF SWITCHES AND SWITCHED VARACTORS
V
I1
C1 R1
I2
C2 R2
(C1 + C2 )
Q= (1.17)
ω(R1 C12 + R2 C22 )
This case can be used to analyse most 2-State switched capacitor Digi-
tally Controlled Capacitors Arrays. If we consider the array in the figure
below:
The quality factor of the array in the state 100 can be written as:
(4Con + 3Cof f )
Q= (1.18)
ω( R4 Con
2 + R C2 )
3 of f
1.5. SWITCHED VARACTORS 17
Con R
Con R 4 capacitances On
Con R
4 x Con R/4
Con R
3 x Coff R/3
Coff R
3 capacitances Off
Coff R
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Thin Film Properties
Definitions
Let s consider the beam presented on fig. 2.1.
ux(x) ux(x+!x)
x i+!x
σx = E.x (2.2)
19
20CHAPTER 2. THIN FILM AND MEMS STRUCTURE MECHANICS
σx is expressed in P a
E is called the Young’s modulus of the material, and this is a constant of
the material.
x is the relative elongation, dimensionless.
!x
!y
y = −γx (2.3)
Where γ is the Poisson coefficient of the material (0.3 is typical). The
minus sign expresses that the solid expands in direction orthogonal from
the applied compression.
In plane stress
The thermal expansion coefficient, αT is given by
∂
αT = (2.4)
∂T
Where T is the temperature and is the relative. The order of magnitude
for αT is 10−6 -10−7 . αT is expressed in Kelvin−1 .
The thermal expansion induced by a change in temperature ∆T is given
by:
E
σf ilm = ( )T h (2.6)
1−γ
E
Where ( 1−γ ) is the Biaxial modulus 6= Young’s modulus
t
w
l
dy
d2 y
EI = MA + RA x (2.7)
dx2
The moment MA is given by:
Fa
MA = − (l − a)2 (2.8)
l2
22CHAPTER 2. THIN FILM AND MEMS STRUCTURE MECHANICS
y F
a
x
MA MB
l
RA RB
F
RA = (l − a)2 (l + 2a) (2.9)
l3
And the deflection is given by:
MA x2 RA x3
y= + (2.10)
2EI 6EI
A schematic illustration of a fixed-fixed beam, subjected to a force F
distributed at the center of the beam is shown on Fig. 2.4.
Membranes vs beams
A fixed-fixed beam may have two types of mechanical behaviours. If the
beam has a built in tensile stress, then the stiffness and the spring constant
2.4. CANTILEVERS 23
may arises from the stress in the beam, and results in a spring constant
expression that can be expressed as:
t 1
kstress = 8.σ.(1 − γ).w.( ) (2.11)
l 3 − 2( xl )
When the geometrical factor is being considered, the spring constant
can be written as:
t 1
kgeom = 32.E.w( )3 . x 3 (2.12)
l 8.( l ) − 20.( l ) + 14.( xl ) − 1
x 2
In general, the spring constant of the beam is the sum of the two:
Effects of temperature
Since the beams are fixed at both ends, any temperature change will modify
its internal axial stress and reduce the beam stiffness. This is especially true
for membrane type of switches.
2.4 Cantilevers
There is a single spring constant is this case, given by:
t 1 − ( xl )
kgeom = 2.E.w.( )3 (2.14)
l 3 − 4( xl )3 + ( xl )4
24CHAPTER 2. THIN FILM AND MEMS STRUCTURE MECHANICS
l w
dy
S = (l − x).w (2.15)
Then we can apply the following methodology for the computation of
an electrostatic actuator:
• Compute pull in pull out voltages of the MEMS structure using the
surface
Chapter 3
3.1 Introduction
The mechanical structures that are being used for the fabrication of RF-
MEMS structures are usually simple. They consist in suspended bridges
and cantilevers (levier in french, or poutre console), that can be studied in
a simple and concise manner. The purpose of this chapter will be to provide
the reader with equivalencies between the geometry of the considered struc-
ture and the equivalent parameters (spring constant, mechanical resonance
of frequency of the first order flexion mode of the beam). The methodology
that we will apply is outlined below: We will use analytical expression of the
beam stiffness and resonance frequency to reduce the mechanical structures
to an equivalent spring/mass system.
F
k
-Spring Constant
-Fundemental
flexion mode
MEMS Beam
Parallel plate equivalent structure
25
CHAPTER 3. THE PARALLEL PLATE ELECTROSTATIC
26 ACTUATOR
3.2 Forces on a parallel plate actuator
Suspension spring!
Moveable plate!
Electrostatic gap!
Applied !
voltage!
Dielectric layer!
Fixed plate!
k!
Fr!
V!
hup! Fe!
plate moving from its initial height hup down to a height h. The restoring
force Fr is then given by:
Fr = k.(hup − h) (3.2)
At equilibrium, the restoring force is equal to the electrostatic force:
Fr = Fe (3.3)
3.2. FORCES ON A PARALLEL PLATE ACTUATOR 27
1
k.(hup − h) = Q.E (3.4)
2
1 V
k.(hup − h) = C.V. (3.5)
2 h
C.V 2
k.(hup − h) = (3.6)
2.h
o .S.V 2
k.(hup − h) = (3.7)
2.h2
Finally, V can be written as a function of h:
s
2.k.h2 (hup − h)
V = (3.8)
o .S
Equation 3.8 is plotted on figure 3.4. It can be seen that there are
two possible heights for a single value of V . In practice, the behavior of a
parallel plate actuator can be described as follows. The initial height of the
gap is hup , and this gap is decreasing as the applied voltage is increased.
As the voltage is increased, the gap comes to a height equal to 2/3 of the
initial gap.
At this point, the parallel plate system becomes unstable, and the plate
comes down until its comes into contact with the dielectric layer on the
bottom electrode. The voltage for which the plate reaches 2/3 of its height
is called the pull − in voltage, denoted Vp .
Then, the voltage needs to be reduced down to a value called Vr for the
plate to come up again. This is a highly non linear behavior of the parallel
plate, and only the first third of the height permits linear movement of the
plate.
The pull-in voltage is given by:
s
8.k.h3up
Vp = (3.9)
27.0 .S
To compute the release voltage of the system, we first need to know the
CHAPTER 3. THE PARALLEL PLATE ELECTROSTATIC
28 ACTUATOR
V!
Vp!
Vr!
hdown! hup! h!
and
o r S
Cdown = (3.11)
hdown
1 V2
Fe = C (3.12)
2 h
In the down state, the contact between the upper plate and the dielectric is
not perfect and a small air gap remains between the plate and the dielectric,
as shown on figure 3.5.
The capacitance in the down state is given by:
o ef f S
Cdown = (3.13)
hdown
1 o r SV 2
Fe = (3.14)
2 h2down
3.2. FORCES ON A PARALLEL PLATE ACTUATOR 29
C2!
C2C1!
Cdown=!
!eff! C1 + C2 !
!!" C1!
Figure 3.5: Effects of the dielectric roughness on the actuator in the down
state, and equivalent modeling using two capacitances, C1 and C2 , in series.
From equation 3.9, the pull-in voltage, Vp is increasing with the initial gap
h to the power 3/2, while the release voltage is increasing with the square
root of the initial gap, and linearly with the dielectric thickness.
It means that the mechanical restoring forces have more importance com-
pared to electrostatic forces when the initial gap is small. As we will see
later in the chapter, parallel plate electrostatic actuators are more reliable
for a given pull-in voltage if the initial electrostatic gap is small, which is
very counter intuitive.
Vr also depends on the capacitance in the down state and the height of
the plate in the down state. Modelling is difficult, since the discrepancy
between the theoretical value of the capacitance and the measured one may
come from a poor contact between the dielectric and the plate, but also
from a change in the dielectric layer relative permittivity. Overall, the best
possible approach is to determine the permittivity of the layer from on-wafer
CHAPTER 3. THE PARALLEL PLATE ELECTROSTATIC
30 ACTUATOR
MIM capacitors, and then compute the air gap giving the correct value for
C2 on figure 3.5.
Cdown!
1,5 Cup!
Cup!
-Vp! -Vr! Vr! Vp!
V!
O!
Finally, the first third of the movement of the parallel plate can be used
as a linearly varying capacitance. The maximum value that can be reached
by the capacitance, Cmax,linear from the capacitance at 23 of the initial height,
hup :
o S 3
Cmax,linear = 2 = Cup (3.19)
h
3 up
2
This type of operation must be used with caution, since the instability oc-
curs well before this height, and usually one can expect 10 percent variation
and not 50 percent theoretically as shown above.
The capacitance to voltage characteristics is shown on figure 3.6.
It is shown clearly that there is an hysteresis, and that the voltage needs
to be strongly reduced in order to release the gap.
Example 1
Let us consider a parallel plate actuator with square dimensions of 200x200µm.
The measured up state capacitance Cup is 100 fF, and the down state ca-
pacitance is Cdown is 3 pF. The dielectric layer is td =0,4µm thick, with a
relative permittivity r =10. The up state capacitance is:
o S
Cup = (3.20)
go
o r S 8, 82.10−12 .4.10−8
go = = = 3, 6µm (3.21)
Cup 10−13
3.2. FORCES ON A PARALLEL PLATE ACTUATOR 31
27 2 S
k= V o = 32N.m−1 (3.22)
8 p g3
C1 is computed from the dielectric film characteristics:
Cdown C1
C2 = = 4pF (3.24)
C1 − Cdown
0 S
hair = = 0, 1µm (3.25)
C2
Then, the total height of the capacitance hdown is hair +hdiel =0.5 µm
ef f can then be computed from Cdown
Cdown .hdown
ef f = = 4, 25 (3.26)
o .S
Example 2
Let s consider the parallel plate actuator shown below. The initial gap g0
is 2 µm, and the pull-in voltage Vp is 20 Volts. The surface of the actuator
is 100x100 µm.
k S=100x100 µm
g0
27 Vp2 .0 .S
k= 3
= 17N.m−1 (3.28)
8 g0
Next, the gap is reduced to 1 µm. The pull in voltage is the same.
The new spring constant is:
27 Vp2 .0 .S
k= = 136N.m−1 (3.30)
8 g03
We can see that the restoring force scales as 1/g02 for a given pull in
voltage. Therefore, devices with small gaps have more reliability than de-
vices with large gaps. The downside is the reduced contrast between the
two states.
Example 3
We will consider the previous example, with an initial component with
Vpinitial =20 Volts, k = 17N.m−1 , and g0 = 2µm. The restoring force is 34
3.3. TRIPLE PLATE SYSTEMS 33
tdiel, εr
V h2
h1 tdiel, εr
In the above figure, a moveable plate is inserted between two fixed par-
allel plates. The center plate is connected to ground, and bias voltages can
be applied to the two fixed plates. In the example above, structure is made
with two separation gaps h1 and h2 . The spring constant k is given by the
two springs on the sides of the moveable plate. Actuation of the parallel
CHAPTER 3. THE PARALLEL PLATE ELECTROSTATIC
34 ACTUATOR
plate by one of the two fixed plates is not different from a conventional two-
plate system, and separate actuation upwards or downwards can be easily
described by the equations given above. Vp1 and Vp2 can be computed from
the following equations:
s
8kh31
Vp1 = (3.34)
270 S
s
8kh32
Vp2 = (3.35)
270 S
Triple-plate systems differ when the moveable plate is actuated down to
one of the fixed plates. This situation is depicted below:
V1
h1+h2
1 o r SV12
Fe = (3.36)
2 t2diel
V1 V2
h1+h2
1 o SV22
Fup = (3.37)
2 (h1 + h2 )2
3.3. TRIPLE PLATE SYSTEMS 35
Fup = Fe (3.38)
1 o SV22 1 o r SV12
= (3.39)
2 (h1 + h2 )2 2 t2diel
V22 r V12
= (3.40)
(h1 + h2 )2 t2diel
V22 r (h1 + h2 )2
= (3.41)
V12 t2diel
V2 √ (h1 + h2 )
= r (3.42)
V1 tdiel
Therefore, the voltage V2 required to overcome the force holding the
lower plate in contact, is generally much larger than the applied static
voltage V1 .
Example
A design example is given below:
tdiel = 0.6µm, h1 = h2 = 0.3µm, r = 10
V2 √ 0.6
= 10 = 3.33 (3.43)
V1 0.6
There is one final case to be studied, is when an RF power is applied on
the upper plate, like depicted above:
V1
VRF
Summary
• Small electrostatic gaps are the most efficient approach for the fabri-
cation of reliable components.
• The restoring force and pressure are the most important parameters
to consider.
• Cdown /Cup is 20. The dielectric layer is 0.2 µm thick. Compute the
effective permittivity of the dielectric layer.
Contact Physics
4.1 Introduction
Together with charge trapping, contact physics have been the most chal-
lenging issues to achieve large ohmic switches reliability. The most difficult
part to understand was that MEMS contact physics derives mostly from
static contact macroscopic models, and not from conventional macroscopic
dynamic models. For instance, arcing plays a preeminent role in relay
physics. In MEMS, there is no arcing because of the Pashen law, that was
mentionned earlier in the course. Therefore the durability of an electrical
contact in MEMS relays mostly depend on the contact force applied on the
metals, and the nature of the contact metals at play. This is similar in
many points to static contact physics, that has been studied by connector
engineering for instance.
37
38 CHAPTER 4. CONTACT PHYSICS
k!
Fr!
V! k!
h2! Fc! Fr!
Fe!
h1! Vapp!
h2!
Fe!
CV 2 o SV 2
Fe = = (4.1)
2h 2h2
Fc + Fr = Fe (4.2)
Where Fc is the contact force, i.e. the force applied on the contact point,
and Fr is the restoring force provided by the mechanical spring, and Fe the
electrostatic force.
This equation can be written as:
2
0 SVapp
Fc + kh1 = (4.3)
2h22
2
0 SVapp
Fc = − kh1 (4.4)
2.h22
Let s consider the case where Vapp =Vp . Vp2 is given by:
8 k.(h1 + h2 )3
Vp2 = (4.5)
27 0 .S
4.2. CONTACT FORCES ON A PARALLEL PLATE ACTUATOR 39
4 k.(h1 + h2 )3
Fc = − k.h1 (4.6)
27 h22
2
We can express this quantity as a function of Vapp /Vp2 :
2
4 Vapp k.(h1 + h2 )3
Fc = − k.h1 (4.7)
27 Vp2 h22
2
Fc h2 4 Vapp (h1 + h2 )3 h1
= ( − ) (4.9)
Fr h1 27 Vp2 h32 h2
This ratio does not depend on the spring constant of the device, nor
to the pull in voltage. It only depends on the geometry of the contacting
dimple and the electrostatic gap (h2 /h1 ). This ratio is directly impacting
the reliability of contacting devices. Ohmic contacting devices should have
a an Fc /Fr less than 3-4 to be reliable.
Example 1
Let s consider the case where h2 /h1 is 1. Then (h1 + h2 )/(h2 )=2
If Vapp is Vp then the Fc /Fr is (32/27 − 1) = 0, 185
if Vapp is 1.4xVp then Fc /Fr is (64/27 − 1) = 1, 37
Let s consider the case where h2 /h1 is 0,5. Then (h1 + h2 )/(h2 )=3
If Vapp is Vp then the Fc /Fr is 0, 5.(108/27 − 2) = 1
40 CHAPTER 4. CONTACT PHYSICS
The last interesting case is where h2 /h1 is 2. Then (h1 + h2 )/(h2 )=1, 5
If Vapp is Vp then the Fc /Fr is 2.(27/(2.27) − 0.5) = 0
if Vapp is 1.4xVp then Fc /Fr is 0, 5.(1 − 0.5) = 0, 25
This last case is interesting only if the applied voltage is sufficient to gen-
erate enough contact force.
Example 2
We want to design to design switch with a contact force of 500 µN . The
fabrication process allows to use a 2 step sacrificial layer of 0,5 µm each
(h1 =h2 =0,5µm). The switch is to be used at 1,4 Vp .The actuator is a
200x200 µm2 plate.
1. Compute the theoretical Fc /Fr on this process. Deduce the restoring
force Fr , and the spring constant k.
2. Compute the theoretical pull-in voltage of the switch, Vp
365.10−6
k= = 730N.m−1 (4.10)
0, 5.10−6
applied, which is typical for an Ohmic switch. The contact pressure is given
by:
F
Pc = Pa (4.12)
S
100.10−6
Pc = Pa (4.13)
25.10−12
Pc = 4.106 P a = 4M P a (4.14)
1
Pc = P a = 100M P a (4.15)
10−8
3Fc
δ=( ∗ (1/2)
)(2/3) (4.16)
4E R
a, the contact radius is given by:
42 CHAPTER 4. CONTACT PHYSICS
E2,!2
R2
!
2a
E1,!1
R1
3Fc R (1/3)
a=( ) (4.17)
4E ∗
The effective radius, R, is given by:
1 1 1
= + (4.18)
R R1 R2
and E ∗ :
1 1 − ν12 1 − ν22
= + (4.19)
E∗ E1 E2
The resulting constriction resistance is given by:
ρ1 + ρ2
Rc = (4.20)
4a
where ρ is the arithmetic average of the two resistivities.
4.5. MULTIPLE CONTACT POINTS MODEL 43
Where L is the Lorentz constant (2.45 x 10−8 (V/K)2 ) and T is the absolute
temperature. From eq. 4.21, the temperature can be deduced from the
following rigorous relation:
Examples
Gold softening voltage
The softening temperature for pure gold is 65o C. Compute the correspond-
ing softening voltage. λ=317 Wm−1−1 and ρ=1/(45,2.106 ) Ohm.m
The ambient temperature is 293K. Use eqs. 4.25 and 4.21.