Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table 7 Interpretation and Analysis
Table 7 Interpretation and Analysis
Table 7 Interpretation and Analysis
F-statistics on the
Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
Null Hypothesis (HN): There is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according
to Department.
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): There is a significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped
according to Department.
For Work Itself, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (0.54) is less than the P-value (0.59). Thus, the F-stat value
does not reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude
that there is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Pay, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (2.62) is less than the P-value (0.09). Thus, the F-stat value does not
reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude that there
is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Promotion, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (1.28) is less than the P-value (0.29). Thus, the F-stat value
does not reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude
that there is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Supervision, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (0.85) is less than the P-value (0.44). Thus, the F-stat value
does not reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude
that there is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Co-Workers, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (1.40) is less than the P-value (0.26). Thus, the F-stat value
does not reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude
that there is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Company Policy, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (4.38) is greater than the P-value (0.02). Thus, the F-stat
value exceeds the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We reject our null hypothesis, accept our alternative hypothesis, and conclude
that there is a significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.
For Working Conditions, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (3.53) is greater than the P-value (0.04). Thus, the F-
stat value exceeds the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We reject our null hypothesis, accept our alternative hypothesis, and
conclude that there is a significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to
Department.
Overall, the probability of obtaining a computed F-stat value of (2.05) is less than the P-value (0.14). Thus, the F-stat value does not
reach the critical F-value at 0.05 level of significance. We accept our null hypothesis, reject our alternative hypothesis, and conclude that there
is no significant difference on the Level of Satisfaction among Employees of MERALCO when grouped according to Department.