Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ogi Project Work
Ogi Project Work
BY
OCTOBER, 2023.
i
DECLARATION
I declare that the contents of this project are my original work and that no part of it has
been lifted or quoted from other sources without full and adequate citation of the sources
and without due credit given to the original authors of the work cited or lifted. I also
declare that this work has not been presented in any form for any award or publication
elsewhere.
__________________ _________________
ii
CERTIFICATION
This project title Identification and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) found in
“Ogi” from different areas in Anyigba by Samuel, Faith Ojochenemi with matriculation number
19FS1059 meet the regulations governing the award of the degree of a Bachelor of Science
(B.Sc) Food Science And Technology of Prince Abubakar Audu University Anyigba Kogi State
University, and is approved for its contribution to knowledge and literary presentation.
__________________ __________________
Dr. Mrs. Grace Usman Date
Supervisor
__________________ __________________
Prof. C. O Orishagbemi Date
HOD (Food Nutrition and Home Science)
__________________ __________________
External Supervisor Date
iii
DEDICATION
This piece of work is dedicated to Almighty God for His love, care and support throughout my
educational pursuit.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praises and adorations to Almighty Yahweh for keeping me to the end of this program. I
To my amiable supervisor, Dr. Mrs. Grace Usman whose correcting ink never ceased to flow
where necessary, on her instructions was the word success depended. Your effort is really
Mr. Isah Rasheed, Mrs. Ladi Opega, Mr. Achimugu Solomon, Mr. Igbatigbi Jesse, to mention
My unending gratitude goes to my late dad, Mr. Samuel Odawn and my Mum, Mrs. Blessing
Samuel who started and supported my educational journey in all aspect, to my cheerful and
lovely siblings, Ufedojo, Ojochegbe, Oneh and Ojotule also goes my appreciation for their moral
support.
Also, am elated to extend my warm gratitude to my boyfriend, Ojonimi Daniel for love, care and
I also want to thank my uncle, Mr. Philip Obaje, my friend, Joan, Queen, Abdulhadi and Daniel
for their kind gestures and hands of friendship extended. To everyone whose name am unable to
mention, I am indeed grateful for your immense contributions towards my success. God bless
v
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out to Identify and Characterize Lactic acid Bacteria (LAB) found in
“Ogi” from Anyigba Metropolis. The results of qualitative analysis showed that all sample
tested positive for Streptococcus sp. L. brevis was detected in AAA 1, BBB1, CCC1, and CCC2,
indicating its presence in “Ogi” samples derived from maize (AAA 1), millet (BBB1), and
sorghum (CCC1), as well as the control sample CCC2. L. plantarum was found in AAA2, BBB1,
and BBB2. This indicates that it was present in the control sample AAA 2 and ogi samples derived
from millet (BBB1) and the control sample BBB2. L. Casei was detected in BBB1 and BBB2,
which are both millet-based ogi samples. It was not found in the other samples. Lactis was
detected in CCC1, indicating its presence in sorghum-based ogi, and in AAA 2, the control
sample. The quantitative data related to LAB counts (colony-forming units per gram, cfu/g) for
different species of LAB (Streptococcus sp, L. brevis, L. plantarum, L. Casei, L. Lactis) in
various samples of “Ogi”. The result reveals significant variability in LAB counts (colony-
forming units per gram, cfu/g) across the different ogi samples (AAA 1, AAA2, BBB1, BBB2, CCC1,
and CCC2). From the result, it appears that Streptococcus sp is present in all samples, while
other species like L. brevis, L. plantarum, L. Casei, and L. Lactis show variations in their
presence. The study underscores the diversity of LAB populations in “Ogi”, influenced by the
type of grain used for fermentation. Specific LAB species were identified in various samples,
suggesting that grain selection impacts microbial composition. Control samples were crucial for
establishing baselines and provided insights into the natural occurrence of LAB. Based solely on
the microbial counts from the result of this study, it appears that the control samples (AAA 2,
BBB2, and CCC2) have counts within the international standards and may be recommended for
production
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Page
Declaration......................................................................................................................................ii
Certification....................................................................................................................................iii
Dedication.......................................................................................................................................iv
Acknowledgement...........................................................................................................................v
Abstract...........................................................................................................................................vi
Table of Contents..........................................................................................................................vii
Chapter One.....................................................................................................................................1
1.0 Introduction...........................................................................................................................1
1.1 Justification of the Study......................................................................................................4
1.2 Significance of this Study.....................................................................................................4
1.3 Broad Objective of the Study...............................................................................................5
1.4 Specific Objective of the Study............................................................................................5
Chapter Two....................................................................................................................................6
2.0 Literature Review.................................................................................................................6
2.1 Fermentation.........................................................................................................................6
2.2 Fermentation Process in Ogi.................................................................................................8
2.3 Nutritional Quality of Ogi..................................................................................................10
2.4 Microbiological Properties of Ogi......................................................................................12
2.5 Safety Assessment of Ogi...................................................................................................14
2.6 Probiotic Attributes of Ogi.................................................................................................16
2.7 Types and properties of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)............................................................17
2.7.1 Lacticbacillus:.............................................................................................................18
2.7.2 Bifidobacterium:..........................................................................................................18
2.7.3 Streptococcus:.............................................................................................................18
2.7.4 Leuconostoc:...............................................................................................................18
2.7.5 Pediococcus:................................................................................................................18
2.7.6 Enterococcus:..............................................................................................................19
2.7.7 Oenococcus:................................................................................................................19
2.7.8 Lacticcoccus:...............................................................................................................19
vii
Chapter Three................................................................................................................................20
3.0 Materials and Methods.......................................................................................................20
3.1 Source of Raw Materials and Sample Collection...............................................................20
3.2 Preparation of Ogi Control Samples...................................................................................20
3.3 Enumeration of LAB Ogi Sample......................................................................................20
3.4 Statistical Data Analysis.....................................................................................................23
Chapter Four..................................................................................................................................24
4.0 Results and Discussion.......................................................................................................24
4.1 Interpretation and Discussion of Table 4.1:........................................................................24
4.2 Interpretation and Discussion of Table 4.2:........................................................................27
Chapter Five...................................................................................................................................32
Conclusion and Recommendation.................................................................................................32
5.1 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................32
5.2 Recommendations:.............................................................................................................33
Reference.......................................................................................................................................34
viii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
1
into a thick gel and then allowed to
set stiff in leaf moulds
as eko or agidi. In either form, it
is usually preferred to
many other indigenous foods by
the aged and the
convalescence.
Nigeria, ogi is either prepared into
a smooth porridge
called pap or a solid gel known as
eko or agidi. The
consistency of the pap varies from
thick to watery
according to choice. The pap can be
sweetened with sugar
and milk; it is then eaten with bean
cake. The pap is used
as the first native food for weaning
babies [11-12]. It also
2
serves as breakfast meal for pre-
school, school children
and adults [13]. In a more
concentrated form, it is boiled
into a thick gel and then allowed to
set stiff in leaf moulds
as eko or agidi. In either form, it
is usually preferred to
many other indigenous foods by
the aged and the
convalescence.
Nigeria, ogi is either prepared into
a smooth porridge
called pap or a solid gel known as
eko or agidi. The
consistency of the pap varies from
thick to watery
according to choice. The pap can be
sweetened with sugar
3
and milk; it is then eaten with bean
cake. The pap is used
as the first native food for weaning
babies [11-12]. It also
serves as breakfast meal for pre-
school, school children
and adults [13]. In a more
concentrated form, it is boiled
into a thick gel and then allowed to
set stiff in leaf moulds
as eko or agidi. In either form, it
is usually preferred to
many other indigenous foods by
the aged and the
convalescence.
"Ogi, a traditional fermented maize-based food staple in West Africa, is produced by soaking,
dehulling, and grinding maize, followed by fermentation and drying (Ekpa et al., 2019). “Ogi”
has become part of the staple diets for young adults, nursing mothers and weaning ration for
infants between the ages of 1-2 yrs. (De Vries-Ten Have et al., 2020). “Ogi” is also a choice
meal for patients that are in need of soft and easily digestible foods. It is a fermented non-
alcoholic starch food that has sour taste. The fermentation process used in making ogi is a lactic
4
acid fermentation, which is a type of anaerobic fermentation (Ekpa et al., 2020). During the
fermentation process, lactic acid bacteria convert the sugars in the cereal grains into lactic acid,
which gives the ogi its characteristic sour taste and helps to preserve it. This process also
increases the digestibility and nutritional value of the ogi by breaking down complex
carbohydrates into simpler forms that are easier for the body to absorb (Ekpa et al., 2020).
Ogi can be consumed with varieties of other food products like bread, fried bean cake (Akara),
Moi-moi, fried yam, cooked beans and fried plantain. “Ogi” can also be consumed with milk,
tea, sugar and honey to improve its taste and nutrients (Rashwan, et al., 2021). This
supplementation is also done to improve the low quality of maize protein and to replenish the
5
process variations and
mechanization, and nutritional
improvement [11, 15]. The
microbiology of ogi and
related products during the
processing stages up to the
finished products have equally been
studied [15-16]. New
attention is presently on the use of
starter cultures, which
is solving numerous problems
associated with the product.
An important cereal porridge in the West African sub-region, “ogi” has for some time,
been a subject of scientific evaluations (Amagloh, 2022). Many workers have reported on
different aspects of “Ogi” production. Particular attention has been given to the various
aspects such as process variations and mechanization, and nutritional improvement (Sala et
al., 2017). The microbiology of “Ogi” and related products during the processing stages
up to the finished products have equally been studied (Chibuzor-Onyema et al., 2021). New
attention is presently on the use of starter cultures, which is solving numerous problems
6
Wild fermentation is a process of food and beverage preparation that involves allowing naturally
occurring microorganisms, such as bacteria and yeasts, to ferment the ingredients without the
addition of commercial starter cultures. In this method, the microorganisms that are present on
the surface of the fruits, vegetables, or grains are allowed to interact with the food, which
Wild fermentation can be used to make a variety of foods and beverages, including bread, beer,
wine, sauerkraut, kimchi, and pickles (Schloss, 2019). The resulting products often have unique
flavors and textures that reflect the specific mix of microorganisms that were present during the
fermentation process (Katz, 2012). One of the advantages of wild fermentation is that it can be a
more sustainable and cost-effective method of food preparation, as it does not require the use of
commercial starter cultures or other additives (Rezac et al., 2018). Additionally, some
proponents of wild fermentation argue that it can lead to greater diversity of microbial
communities in our food and in our bodies, which may have health benefits (Tournas and
Katsoudas, 2015). However, it is important to note that wild fermentation can be a somewhat
unpredictable process, as it can be affected by factors such as temperature, humidity, and the
Lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) are a group of bacteria that produce lactic acid as a primary
metabolic end-product of carbohydrate fermentation. In food production, LAB play a vital role
as starter cultures for fermented foods, such as yogurt, kefir, sourdough bread, and ogi
(Maluleke, 2019). Lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) play a vital role in the fermentation process,
contributing to the flavor, aroma, and texture of the final product, preserving the quality and
safety of the food by suppressing the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, and
offering potential health benefits to consumers through their probiotic properties (Valero-Cases
et al., 2020).
7
The identification and characterization of LAB in ogi is important for several reasons. Firstly,
LAB contribute to the flavor, aroma, and texture of the final product (Liptáková et al., 2017).
Secondly, LAB play a crucial role in preserving the quality and safety of fermented foods by
suppressing the growth of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms (Liptáková et al., 2017).
Finally, some LAB have been found to have probiotic properties, which may offer health
To identify and characterize the LAB in ogi, researchers typically use a combination of
microbiological, molecular, and biochemical methods (Efiuvwevwer et al., 2022). These include
culture-based methods, such as isolation and identification of LAB strains, as well as molecular
methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
(DGGE), and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes (Efiuvwevwer et al., 2022). Biochemical methods,
such as sugar fermentation patterns and the production of exopolysaccharides, can also be used
Thus, this study seek to identify and characterize the LABS present in fermented ogi produced
from yellow maize, millet and sorghum to establish the significance in terms of nutrition in these
cereal products.
8
1.1 Justification of the Study
"Ogi is a traditional fermented maize-based food staple in West Africa that is an important
source of nutrition for many people in the region. The fermentation process of ogi is crucial for
its flavor, aroma, texture, and preservation, and is largely influenced by the LAB present in the
product. Understanding the microbial diversity and functionality of the LAB in ogi is important
for ensuring the quality, safety, and potential health benefits of this traditional food.
However, there is limited information on the LAB present in ogi produced from maize, sorghum
and millet fermented at varying periods (2 days, 4days and six days) and their role in the
fermentation process. To address this gap in knowledge, a study on the Identification and
characterization of LAB (Lactic acid bacteria) found in ogi is necessary. The results of this study
will contribute to the overall understanding of the microbial diversity and functionality of LAB
in ogi, providing valuable information for the preservation and improvement of this traditional
food. The findings of this study will also have implications for the potential health benefits of
ogi, as some LAB have been found to have probiotic properties. Furthermore, this study will
provide a foundation for future research on the optimization of the fermentation process and the
diversity and functionality of LAB in ogi, a traditional fermented cereal-based food staple in
West Africa. Ogi is an important source of nutrition for many people in the region and the
fermentation process is crucial for its preservation and quality, as well as its flavor, aroma, and
The results of this study provide valuable information on the LAB present in ogi and their role in
the fermentation process. This information will have implications for the quality, safety, and
9
potential health benefits of the food. For example, the study may identify LAB strains with
probiotic properties, which could have positive effects on the health of consumers (Efiuvwevwer
et al., 2022).
Furthermore, the findings of this study will provide a foundation for future research on the
optimization of the fermentation process and the development of improved starter cultures for
ogi. This will benefit the production and preservation of this traditional food and ensure its
10
CHAPTER TWO
through the action of enzymes. In biochemistry, it is narrowly defined as the extraction of energy
from carbohydrates in the absence of oxygen. In food production, it may more broadly refer to
any process in which the activity of microorganisms brings about a desirable change to a
(ATP) by the degradation of organic nutrients anaerobically (Klein et al., 2006). Humans have
used fermentation to produce foodstuffs and beverages since the Neolithic age. For example,
fermentation is used for preservation in a process that produces lactic acid found in such sour
foods as pickled cucumbers, Ogi, kombucha, kimchi, and yogurt, as well as for producing
Most fermented foods contain a complex mixture of carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and so on;
providing variety to the diet, there are further important consequences of fermentation (Potter
and Hotchkiss, 2006). Several of the end products of food fermentation, particularly acids and
alcohols, are inhibitory to the common pathogenic microorganisms that may find their way into
foods, e.g. inability of Clostridium botulinum to grow and produce toxin at pH values of ≤4.6.
When microorganisms ferment food constituents, they yield energy in the process and increase in
numbers. To the extent that food constituents are oxidized, their remaining energy potential for
human decreases Hui, (2004). Compounds that are completely oxidized by fermentation to such
11
end products as CO2 and water retain no further energy value. Some of the beneficial effects of
fermented food which contains probiotic organism consumption include: (i) improving intestinal
tract health; (ii) enhancing the immune system, synthesizing and enhancing the bioavailability of
nutrients; (iii) reducing symptoms of lacticse intolerance, decreasing the prevalence of allergy in
susceptible individuals; and (iv) reducing risk of certain cancers. The mechanisms by which
probiotics exert their effects are largely unknown, but may involve modifying gut pH,
binding and receptor sites as well as for available nutrients and growth factors, stimulating
immunomodulatory cells, and producing lactase. The fermenting organisms include LAB (Lactic
Pediococcus spp (Moslehi-Jenabian et at., 2010). The yeasts isolated are mainly of the species
Saccharomyces, Kluyeromyces and Debaryomyces (Jones et at. 2010). Moulds have been used
mainly in milk and cheese fermentation and include Penicillium, Mucor, Geotrichium, and
Rhizopus species (Wouters et al., 2012; Varga et al., 2015). Some of the microorganisms
isolated from fermented food are, however, yet to be identified. In all the foods and beverages
examined, LAB is the dominant microorganisms, and therefore, lactic acid fermentation is
considered as the major contributor to the beneficial characteristics observed in fermented foods.
The numerous fermented food products in Asia can be categorized into five groups: (1)
fermented soybean products, (2) fermented fish products, (3) fermented vegetable products, (4)
fermented bread and porridges, and (5) alcoholic beverages. Probiotics are involved in all of
these fermentations to a varying extent, having either positive or negative effects on the eventual
product. Nutrition is known to influence the heath and can thereby modulate resistance to
infection.
12
2.2 Fermentation Process in Ogi
Fermented foods native to Africa have gained substantial recognition in both research and
economic sectors due to their organoleptic and health advantages, in addition to their role as a
source of energy and nutrients. These health benefits are primarily attributed to the activities of
A variety of traditional fermented cereal-based foods are prevalent across the African continent,
including kunun-zaki, bushera, fura, mawe, mahewu, injera, burukutu, bussa, and ogi, among
others. Among these, ogi, a fermented food native to Nigeria and West Africa, stands out due to
its versatility and widespread consumption. Ogi serves as a breakfast porridge suitable for
individuals of all age groups and socio-economic classes. It also functions as a weaning food for
infants, a soft meal for convalescents and the elderly, a stimulant for milk production in nursing
mothers, and a reliable source of income for producers, primarily women, in both rural and urban
In Nigeria, ogi goes by different names depending on the region, with popular references
including 'ogi' among the Yoruba, 'koko' among the Ibo, and 'akamu' among the Hausa. The gel-
like variant of ogi is known as 'eko' among the Yoruba and 'agidi' among the Ibo. Additionally,
the supernatant of ogi is consumed as a laxative and is sometimes used in the treatment of
specific ailments, particularly in rural areas (Omemu et al., 2005). The significance of ogi
transcends its role as a staple food; it reflects the rich cultural diversity and dietary heritage of
the region. Furthermore, the consumption of ogi contributes to the preservation of traditional
food processing techniques and the sustenance of rural livelihoods, emphasizing the cultural and
13
The process of fermentation in Ogi begins with selecting and cleaning the raw grains, usually
maize or sorghum, which are then washed thoroughly to remove dirt and debris (Adepeju et al.,
2017). The cleaned grains are soaked in water for a specific period, typically overnight. This
soaking process softens the grains and initiates the fermentation (Okafor et al., 2018).
After soaking, the grains are drained to remove excess water. They are then ground into a coarse
paste or slurry using traditional grinding stones or mechanical grinders. This paste is known as
"akamu" (Omemu et al., 2007). The akamu paste is cooked in a large pot over an open flame or
on a stove. It is continuously stirred to prevent lumps and ensure uniform cooking. During this
process, additional water may be added to achieve the desired consistency (Okafor et al., 2018).
Once the akamu has reached the desired consistency, it is removed from the heat and allowed to
To start the fermentation process, a small quantity of previously fermented ogi (known as
"backslopping") or a natural starter culture is added to the cooled akamu. This culture contains
lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains responsible for fermentation (Adepeju et al., 2017).
plastic. It may also be lined with banana leaves or other natural materials. The container is
covered with a cloth to allow for aeration while preventing contamination (Omemu et al., 2007).
The fermentation container is placed in a warm, dark area, typically for 24 to 48 hours,
depending on the desired level of fermentation. During this time, the lactic acid bacteria and
The fermentation progress is checked by observing changes in taste, texture, and acidity. Ogi is
considered ready when it has the desired sour taste and creamy consistency (Omemu et al.,
2007).
14
Once fermentation is complete, the ogi is harvested and transferred to clean containers for
storage or immediate consumption (Okafor et al., 2018). The fermentation process in ogi
production not only enhances the flavor but also improves the nutritional value of the cereal
carbohydrates, making the nutrients more bioavailable and producing organic acids that act as
Numerous advancements have been explored to enhance the conventional ogi fermentation
process, with a focus on improving its quality and characteristics. These innovations encompass
the utilization of starter cultures, dry milling of grains before soaking and fermentation,
dehulling and milling, sprouting prior to milling, fortification, boiling of grains before milling,
and accelerated batch fermentation, often referred to as backslopping (Adegunwa et al., 2018).
In particular, the introduction of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) starter cultures and the
Ogi produced through these modern methods exhibits a heightened degree of sourness in
comparison to traditionally fermented ogi. This increased sourness can be attributed to the
These innovations not only impact the sensory attributes of ogi but also hold potential for
enhancing its nutritional profile and shelf life, contributing to its suitability as a nutritious and
nutrient losses. These losses occur at various stages of processing, ultimately impacting the
nutritional composition of the final product. Several factors contribute to these nutrient losses,
including steeping, the discarding of steeping water, the sifting process (which removes bran and
15
germ, rich in protein), and the disposal of the ogi supernatant. As a result, essential nutrients like
minerals, fiber, protein, iron, phosphorus, calcium, and various vitamins (such as riboflavin,
thiamine, niacin, folic acid, and pantothenic acid) are substantially reduced (Adegunwa et al.,
These nutrient losses have implications for the nutritional quality of ogi, leading to diminished
net protein utilization, protein energy ratio, and biological values. In regions where ogi
nutritionally compromised product can contribute to protein and energy deficiencies. Such
deficiencies can manifest as serious clinical conditions, including kwashiorkor and marasmus in
To address these nutritional shortcomings and enhance the overall nutritional quality of ogi,
various fortification approaches have been investigated. These strategies aim to compensate for
the lost nutrients and improve the product's health benefits. Some of the studied fortification
methods include:
Enrichment of sorghum ogi flour with cocoa for improved nutritional content and sensory
Production of instant ogi from blends of fermented maize, conophor nuts, and melon
16
Co-fermentation of maize/cowpea and sorghum/cowpea ogi to create instant
(Arachis hypogaea L.) to increase protein and micronutrient content (Oduro et al., 2000).
Fortification of maize Ogi with okra seed meal to improve its nutritional composition
Fortification of ogi with okra seed flour to enhance protein and micronutrient content
These fortification strategies contribute to the development of ogi variants with improved
nutritional profiles, making them valuable dietary options in regions where ogi is a staple food.
Oyarekua and Eleyinmi (2018) in their study on the nutritional quality of corn, sorghum and
millet ogi reported the amino acid (AA) composition of ogi prepared from these grains with
leucine and proline as the most abundant amino acids in corn and millet while for sorghum ogi,
phenylalanine, glycine, arginine and valine were the most abundant. As a result, in the choice of
weaning foods and for children, sorghum ogi would be preferable because of its high value of
arginine 91.5 compared to 33.2 and 43.1 of millet and corn ogi which is an essential amino acid
for children. Considering the total essential amino acid of ogi flours from the three varieties of
cereals as reported by Oyarekua and Eleyinmi (2018), millet ogi (275.2 mg g-1 crude protein),
corn ogi (373.2 mg g-1 CP), and sorghum (721.9 mg g-1 CP), comparatively, only the ogi from
sorghum had values that can be compared with the egg reference protein (566 mg g-1 CP).
Therefore, since sorghum had values that have been shown to satisfy the amino acid requirement
of all age groups it can be regarded as a high quality protein. Although, generally lysine is
17
reported to be low for all the cereals, however, sorghum ogi has a higher content than the other
cereals. In order to improve their nutritional quality as weaning foods, ogi from these cereals
could be supplemented with milk or legume high in lysine (Oluwole et al., 2014).
interplay of various bacterial and fungal species. Over the course of fermentation, some
microorganisms may act concurrently, while others succeed one another, leading to shifts in the
Numerous studies have sought to identify and quantify the microorganisms involved in ogi
fermentation. These investigations have revealed a spectrum of microbial genera that play
pivotal roles in shaping the characteristics of ogi. Within the bacterial domain, the predominant
al., 2008).
(Ogunbanwo et al., 2003; Adegunwa et al., 2017). These fungi contribute to the complex
Notably, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are among the most prevalent microorganisms responsible
for cereal fermentations, including ogi. LAB are renowned for their beneficial contributions,
including preservation, enhanced nutritional value, detoxification, lactic acid production, and the
development of flavor and aroma compounds. Among the LAB species, Lacticbacillus
18
plantarum is frequently identified as the dominant contributor to ogi fermentation (Ogunbanwo
LAB are recognized for their competitive abilities to suppress the growth of other
microorganisms, including potential pathogens, within the fermentation process. The synergy
between LAB and yeast is a common phenomenon in food and beverage fermentations. LAB
create an acidic environment conducive to yeast growth, while yeast reciprocate by providing
essential vitamins and growth factors that support the survival and activity of LAB (Gänzle,
Overall, studies investigating ogi fermentation have consistently identified and characterized
these microorganisms, shedding light on the intricate microbial interactions that underpin this
fermented cereal porridge. Fresh ogi is known to harbor a diverse community of lactic acid
fermentum, and Streptococcus lactis, which are commonly associated with fermented foods
flavus, and other enterobacteriaceae can contaminate the process, raising significant concerns
about the safety and reliability of ogi production (Adegunwa et al., 2017; Ogunbanwo et al.,
2003).
processing and post-processing stages, and they have been linked to food poisoning incidents
(Adegunwa et al., 2017). Water quality and the often unhygienic conditions surrounding ogi
19
processing are major contributors to such contamination, particularly in areas where clean,
potable water is scarce (Adegunwa et al., 2017). Consequently, the microbial quality of ogi can
Contaminated water sources, including wells, rivers, and streams, often serve as the primary
water supply for rural ogi processors. Even municipal water supplies may not be immune to
microbial contamination. The presence of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water signifies direct or
indirect fecal contamination and raises concerns, especially when ogi is consumed either raw or
Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas spp. in raw ogi contribute to the development of undesirable
flavors such as rancidity and ropiness in the fermented product. Moreover, the presence of
Aspergillus spp. in processed ogi poses severe health risks, as some strains of A. flavus are
known to produce aflatoxins, which have been associated with hepatoxicity and cancer-related
Infectious diseases, including cholera, have been linked to ogi consumption due to contamination
during handling and poor hygiene practices during preparation. Additionally, mold growth,
mycotoxin production, yeast infections, and allergies have been associated with stored ogi,
Effective measures to prevent contamination of ogi during processing include using latex gloves
to minimize hand contact, utilizing clean, non-infected grains, treating municipal water, and
ensuring the conscious use of clean surface water during milling and sieving. Proper packaging
and storage of both wet and dry ogi are also essential to avoid microbial contamination
20
To reduce the microbial load, processing water can be boiled and allowed to cool before use.
Muslin cloths used in sieving should be thoroughly washed and properly sterilized. Regular
cleaning of the inner and outer parts of milling machines can also be effective in reducing
It is important to note that while ogi fermentation is associated with inhibiting the growth of
most pathogenic organisms due to its low pH and high total titratable acidity (TTA), maintaining
good hygiene practices and implementing Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
measures are crucial to minimize the presence of pathogens in ogi and ensure its safety
Studies revealed that factors such as poor hygiene, infrequent cleaning of milling machine and
frequent exposures of raw and cooked products may contribute to contamination of ogi. The
practices and poor environmental sanitation. Although food handlers and environment could
serve as possible and important reservoirs for pathogens, studies have shown that the pathogens
investigated could not grow but only survive in the antimicrobial environment of ogi for a short
amounts (typically around 10^6 colony-forming units per milliliter or cfu/ml), confer various
health benefits to the host (Hill et al., 2014). These probiotic bacteria possess specific
characteristics that make them advantageous for human health. These characteristics include
resistance to the acidic and bile environments of the digestive tract, the ability to produce
colonization of the gastrointestinal tract, stimulation of the host immune response, the potential
to lower cholesterol levels, and lacticse activity (Gupta et al., 2019; Hill et al., 2014).
21
A study conducted by Ogunbanwo et al. in 2003 investigated the probiotic potential of
Lacticbacillus plantarum strains isolated from fermenting corn slurry, commonly known as
"ogi." The results of this study revealed that these Lacticbacillus plantarum strains exhibited
strong antagonistic activity against selected pathogenic bacteria, including Bacillus cereus NCIB
6349, Escherichia coli Type 1 NCIB 14070, Klebsiella pneumoniae NCIB 950, Staphylococcus
aureus NCIB 8588, and a clinical isolate of Shigella dysenteriae. Inhibition zones ranging from 1
to 4 mm were observed, indicating the probiotic strains' ability to inhibit the growth of these
the epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract in experimental albino rats. This adherence is a
crucial characteristic as it enables probiotics to establish and maintain a presence in the host's
digestive system. Additionally, the study found that these Lacticbacillus plantarum strains
Adebolu et al. (2017) investigated the effect of uncooked ogi liquor from five varieties of
grains; white maize, yellow maize, white guinea corn, red guinea corn and millet on some
typhimurium and Enterobacter species and concluded almost all the test organisms were
inhibited by the raw ogi liquor with zones of inhibition ranging from 4.0-14.0 mm. The
possibility of which is due to ability of LAB isolated from the raw ogi liquor to produce various
bioactive compounds such as organic acids, diacetyl, lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide and
bacteriocin during lactic acid fermentation. In addition, low pH of liquors could also be partly
responsible for the antibacterial activity against common bacteria that cause diarrhoea. As a
result of this therapeutic benefit, raw ogi is therefore effective in the treatment and prevention of
diarrhoeal a major health hazard and a principal cause of morbidity and mortality especially
22
among infants in rural communities of sub-Saharan Africa where access to primary healthcare
care is not readily available before they are transported to hospital for proper medical care
capacity to produce lactic acid through carbohydrate fermentation. They are commonly
encountered in fermented foods, dairy products, and the human gastrointestinal tract, playing
pivotal roles in food production, preservation, and gut health. The following are various types of
2.7.1 Lacticbacillus:
Fermentation: Lacticbacillus species demonstrate versatility in fermenting a wide range of
Applications: Lacticbacilli are pivotal in the production of dairy products like yogurt and
Probiotic Potential: Certain strains of Lacticbacillus exhibit probiotic attributes, beneficial for
2.7.2 Bifidobacterium:
Fermentation: Bifidobacteria, typically anaerobic, excel in fermenting complex carbohydrates,
Applications: They are crucial constituents of the gut microbiota, contributing to the
2.7.3 Streptococcus:
Fermentation: Streptococcus thermophilus is renowned in the dairy industry for its role in
yogurt production, fermenting lacticse and generating lactic acid and carbon dioxide.
23
Applications: Apart from yogurt, Streptococcus thermophilus is employed in crafting various
dairy products.
2.7.4 Leuconostoc:
Fermentation: Leuconostoc species often participate in the initial stages of fermentation and are
Applications: They contribute to the development of texture and flavor in fermented foods such
as sauerkraut.
2.7.5 Pediococcus:
Fermentation: Pediococcus species are involved in the fermentation of specific beers and
sauerkraut.
Applications: They can produce lactic acid, diacetyl, and other compounds impacting the taste
2.7.6 Enterococcus:
Fermentation: Enterococcus species are robust LAB capable of surviving diverse environmental
conditions.
Applications: They find utility in the fermentation of certain meat products and some cheeses.
2.7.7 Oenococcus:
Fermentation: Oenococcus oeni is widely used in winemaking to facilitate malolactic
fermentation, which reduces acidity and enhances the flavor and stability of wine.
2.7.8 Lacticcoccus:
Fermentation: Lacticcoccus species are integral to dairy fermentation, particularly in cheese
production.
Applications: They contribute to lactic acid production and the development of cheese texture
LAB are indispensable in the production of a diverse array of fermented foods and beverages.
Their metabolic activities not only preserve these foods but also elevate their flavor, texture, and
24
nutritional value. Furthermore, certain LAB strains serve as probiotics, offering various health
25
CHAPTER THREE
producers in Anyigba metropolis (Abuja Area, Anyigba Market and Idah Road) and transported
to the laboratory under refrigeration conditions. The sample was label for proper identification.
by Pael et al., (2013). The cereal grains were cleaned by hand to remove dirt like stones and
chaff. A quantity, 500g of each cereal was steeped in 2 liters of water in clean plastic buckets and
allowed to ferment for 2 days at room temperature. The fermented whole cereal grains were
separated from the steeping water by decanting. Afterwards, the grains were wet milled using a
blender and the resulting slurry passed through a fine sieving cloth(800µ), and will washed with
excess water. The by-products in the sieving cloth was discarded, and the starch in the buckets
was covered with cheesecloth and allowed to settle for 48hrs at room temperature.
The inoculated plates were incubated overnight at 37 0C. The plates were sub-cultured using
Nutrient agar (NA) and incubated microaerophilically overnight at 37 0C. Aerobic count was
determined using de Mann Rogosa Sharp agar (MRS). The colonies were counted using colony
counting. Characterization of the bacterial isolated was done using biochemical tests. LAB’s was
26
Raw Grains of Maize, Millet and Sorghum
Cleaning (to remove dirt’s)
Decanting
Wet Milling
Sieving
Washing
Discarding of by-products
Packaging
27
Fresh Raw Ogi
Serial dilusion
Culturing
Sub-culturing
Colony counting
Identification of LAB
Figure 2: Flow chat for the Identification and Characterization of LAB (lactic acid
bacteria).
Source: Chessbrough (2000)
28
Table 3.1. Sample Code
Key:
29
CHAPTER FOUR
ve) or absence (- ve) of specific LAB species, including Streptococcus sp, L. brevis, L.
plantarum, L. Casei, and L. Lactis, in different Ogi samples from various sources.
Streptococcus sp: All sample were tested positive for Streptococcus sp, indicating that this LAB
species was present in the control sample but absent in the other Ogi samples. This suggests that
L. brevis: L. brevis was detected in AAA1, BBB1, CCC1, and CCC2, indicating its presence in
Ogi samples derived from maize (AAA1), millet (BBB1), and sorghum (CCC1), as well as the
control sample CCC2. This suggests that L. brevis is a common LAB species in these samples.
L. plantarum: L. plantarum was found in AAA2, BBB1, and BBB2. This indicates that it was
present in the control sample A2 and ogi samples derived from millet (BBB1) and the control
sample B2. L. plantarum was not detected in samples AAA1, CCC1, or CCC2.
L. Casei: L. Casei was detected in BBB1 and BBB2, which are both millet-based ogi samples. It
L. Lactis: L. Lactis was detected in CCC1, indicating its presence in sorghum-based ogi, and in
A2, the control sample. It was not detected in the other samples.
The presence or absence of specific LAB species in Ogi samples is influenced by factors such as
the type of grain used (maize, millet, sorghum) and potentially the fermentation process.
30
The control samples (AAA2, BBB2, CCC2) provide a reference point for assessing the presence
of LAB in the absence of grain fermentation. These control samples indicate that some LAB
The findings suggest variability in LAB composition among Ogi samples, which aligns with the
objective of characterizing LAB diversity based on their sugar fermentation patterns and
exopolysaccharide production. The presence of specific LAB species can impact the sensory and
31
Table 4.1: Qualitative Microbial Identification
AAA2 + ve - ve + ve - ve - ve
BBB1 + ve - ve + ve + ve - ve
BBB2 + ve - ve + ve - ve - ve
CCC1 + ve + ve - ve - ve + ve
CCC2 + ve - ve - ve - ve - ve
Key:
Sample AAA1-------- Maize Ogi from Abuja Area
Sample AAA2----- Control
Sample BBB1----- Millet Ogi from Anyigba Market
Sample BBB2----- Control
Sample CCC1----- Sorghum Ogi from Idah Road
Sample CCC2----- Control
+ ve ------------ Positive
- ve ------------ Negative
32
4.2 Interpretation and Discussion of Table 4.2:
The Table presents quantitative data related to LAB counts (colony-forming units per gram,
cfu/g) for different species of LAB (Streptococcus sp, L. brevis, L. plantarum, L. Casei, L.
Lactis) in various samples of Ogi. The samples are labeled AAA 1, AAA2, BBB1, BBB2, CCC1,
and CCC2, with corresponding descriptions: Sample AAA 1: Maize Ogi from Abuja Area, Sample
AAA2: Control, Sample BBB1: Millet Ogi from Anyigba Market, Sample BBB2: Control, Sample
Variation in LAB Counts: The data in Table 4.2 reveals significant variability in LAB counts
(colony-forming units per gram, cfu/g) across the different ogi samples (AAA 1, AAA2, BBB1,
BBB2, CCC1, and CCC2). This suggests that the type and source of the grains (maize, millet,
sorghum) used to make ogi can influence the LAB population in the final product. For example,
sample AAA1 (Maize Ogi) and sample CCC1 (Sorghum Ogi) have relatively higher LAB counts
compared to others.
Influence of Control Samples: The presence of control samples (AAA 2, BBB2, CCC2) is
essential for comparison. They help establish a baseline for LAB counts in the absence of
specific grain fermentation. For instance, sample AAA2 (Control) has LAB counts similar to
sample AAA1 (Maize Ogi) in some cases, indicating potential contamination or naturally
Identification of Specific LAB Species: The study's specific objective was to characterize LAB
species. The presence of specific LAB species in each sample provides insights into the
microbial diversity of Ogi. From the result, it appears that Streptococcus sp is present in all
samples, while other species like L. brevis, L. plantarum, L. Casei, and L. Lactis show variations
in their presence. The absence of some LAB species in certain samples could be due to the
33
Influence of Grain Type: The presence or absence of certain LAB species in Ogi samples may
be related to the type of grain used for fermentation. For example, L. Casei is detected in millet-
based Ogi (sample BBB1), while L. Lactis is prominent in sorghum-based Ogi (sample CCC1).
Implications for Fermentation and Product Quality: The presence of specific LAB species
can influence the sensory and nutritional properties of Ogi. For example, LAB species like L.
brevis and L. Lactis are known for their role in fermentation and may contribute to the
characteristic taste and texture of Ogi. The differences in LAB counts and species composition
across samples can impact the fermentation process, including the production of organic acids
and other metabolites, which play a role in product preservation and flavor development.
Exopolysaccharide Production: The data does not directly provide information about
Discussion
bacteria found in various environments, including the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and
animals, soil, and fermented foods like Ogi (Tyson, 2020). The presence of Streptococcus sp in
samples of the Ogi can be attributed to several factors. According to the report of Odunfa &
Adeyele (2015), contamination from various sources, including raw ingredients, utensils, or
environmental factors during the fermentation process, can introduce these bacteria into the
mixture. Traditional fermentation processes of samples the of Ogi, involving exposure to air and
utensils, can also facilitate their entry. Favorable fermentation conditions, such as temperature
and pH, promote the growth of Streptococcus sp and other LAB species during Ogi fermentation.
34
Streptococcus sp plays a crucial role in Ogi fermentation. LAB, including Streptococcus sp,
contribute to sensory attributes, preservation, and nutritional changes in the final product. They
produce lactic acid, which lowers the pH of Ogi, creating the sour taste characteristic of
fermented foods. This acidity also inhibits the growth of spoilage and pathogenic
microorganisms. Additionally, LAB produce metabolites and enzymes that influence the texture
and aroma of Ogi, enhancing its overall sensory quality. LAB can break down complex
carbohydrates and proteins, improving the bioavailability of nutrients and enhancing the
Lacticbacillus brevis (L. brevis): L. brevis, a gram-positive, rod-shaped LAB species, is versatile
and commonly found in different environmental conditions. It may naturally inhabit raw
ingredients used in the Ogi samples production and can be introduced during fermentation
(Birikan, 2022). L. brevis is known for its involvement in lactic acid fermentation, contributing
to the sour taste, texture, and preservation of Ogi. However, some strains of L. brevis have been
associated with the production of biogenic amines, which can be harmful if consumed
excessively. Proper fermentation control and strain selection are crucial to minimize the
species, is adaptable to various environmental conditions. It may naturally inhabit grains and be
2022). L. plantarum plays a crucial role in carbohydrate fermentation, producing lactic acid that
influences the flavor, acidity, and preservation of Ogi. However, some strains of L. plantarum
can produce off-flavors or undesirable compounds if fermentation conditions are not well-
controlled. Monitoring the fermentation process is essential to ensure the desired sensory quality.
35
Lacticbacillus casei (L. casei): L. casei, a gram-positive, rod-shaped LAB species known for its
processing. Its role in Ogi may be limited compared to other LAB species. Proper fermentation
Lacticcoccus lactis (L. lactis): L. lactis, a gram-positive, cocci-shaped LAB species commonly
used in dairy fermentations, may be present in Ogi due to its distribution and adaptation to
different fermentation processes. L. lactis is known for producing lactic acid and other
metabolites, contributing to the sourness and sensory attributes of fermented foods (Ahmed et
al., 2019). While generally beneficial, specific strains of L. lactis may not contribute positively
Microbial Analysis and Contamination: The microbial analysis of Ogi samples showed the
presence of microorganisms. Contamination may result from various sources, including the raw
materials purchased from open markets, where conditions may allow microorganisms to thrive.
Grains and other food substances can retain their natural microflora from the field, and
contamination can occur from soil, water, insects, and other sources during collection and
The presence of microorganisms in Ogi underscores the importance of proper hygiene and
sanitation practices throughout the production process (Oyedeji et al., 2023). Contamination can
occur through contact with the nose, hands, skin, and clothing of handlers, as well as through
coughing, talking, and sneezing, which can produce droplets that settle on the food during
transportation, storage, and retailing (Haas et al., 2014). Therefore, adherence to hygiene and
36
Table 4.2: Quantitative Microbial Identification
Sample Streptococcus sp L. brevis L. plantarum L. Casei L. Lactis
Code (cfu/g) (cfu/g) (cfu/g) (cfu/g) (cfu/g)
AAA1 1.25 x 105 3.7 x 104 0.00 0.00 0.00
Key:
37
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Conclusion
The study aimed to isolate, identify, and characterize lactic-acid bacteria (LAB) present in “Ogi”,
a traditional fermented food staple made from maize, millet, and sorghum in the metropolis of
understand the LAB population, their species composition, and potential implications for Ogi
fermentation.
different Ogi samples. The presence of specific LAB species differed among samples, suggesting
that factors such as grain type and source influence LAB populations.
Qualitative Microbial Identification provided insights into the presence or absence of specific
LAB species in the samples. It revealed variations in LAB species composition, highlighting
The study underscores the diversity of LAB populations in Ogi, influenced by the type of grain
used for fermentation. Specific LAB species were identified in various samples, suggesting that
grain selection impacts microbial composition. Control samples were crucial for establishing
baselines and provided insights into the natural occurrence of LAB. Some control samples
exhibited LAB counts similar to fermented Ogi, suggesting the presence of naturally occurring
38
5.2 Recommendations:
1. Based solely on the microbial counts from the result of this study, it appears that the
control samples (AAA2, BBB2, and CCC2) have counts within the international standards
in Ogi, including their metabolic activities, sugar fermentation patterns, and production of
during fermentation, on LAB populations. Optimizing these conditions can enhance the
4. Understanding the functional roles of LAB species can lead to improvements in Ogi
quality and shelf life. Exploring LAB's potential as starter cultures for controlled
5. Grain Selection: Evaluate the suitability of different grains (maize, millet, sorghum) for
Ogi production and their influence on LAB diversity. This can guide grain selection for
39
REFERENCES
Adebolu T. T, Olodun A. O, Ihunweze B. C. (2017). Evaluation of ogi liquor from different
grains for antibacterial activities against some common diarrhoeal bacteria in Southwest
Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology. 6(9):1140-1143.
Adegunwa, M. O., Adetuyi, F. C., & Adebowale, A. A. (2017). Bioprocessing of cereals: An
overview. In G. M. Gurr, C. R. Wang, & B. S. Omoloye (Eds.), Cereal Grains (pp. 151-
169). InTechOpen.
Adegunwa, M. O., Adetuyi, F. C., & Adebowale, A. A. (2017). Bioprocessing of cereals: An
overview. In G. M. Gurr, C. R. Wang, & B. S. Omoloye (Eds.), Cereal Grains (pp. 151-
169). InTechOpen.
Adegunwa, M. O., Aluko, R. E., & Ejiofor, C. (2018). Ogi (pap): Production, fortification and
health benefits. Food Reviews International, 34(4), 312-339.
Adegunwa, M. O., Aluko, R. E., & Ejiofor, C. (2018). Ogi (pap): Production, fortification, and
health benefits. Food Reviews International, 34(4), 312-339.
Adepeju, A. B., Omemu, A. M., & Oyewole, O. B. (2012). Microbiological and physicochemical
analyses of fermented maize, sorghum and millet for ogi production. Food Control, 24(1-
2), 1-6.
Adepoju, O. T., Bamiro, F. O., & Badaru, M. O. (2014). Proximate and mineral composition of
ready-to-eat blends of fermented maize, conophor nuts and melon seeds. Food Science
and Quality Management, 33, 16-23.
Adeyeye, S. A. O., Falade, K. O., & Olaniyi, S. O. (2018). Improvement of ogi, a traditional
fermented cereal pudding using cocoa powder. International Journal of Food Science &
Technology, 53(1), 102-109.
Ahmed, K., Hussain, A., Imran, Q. M., & Hussain, W. (2019). Microbiological quality of ice
cream sold in Gilgit town. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8(9), 1397-1400.
Amagloh, F. K. (2022). Sweetpotato-based infant foods produce porridge with lower viscosity
and aflatoxin level than cereal-based complementary blends. Plos one, 17(10), e0275593.
Baliyan, N., Kumari, M., Kumari, P., Dindhoria, K., Mukhia, S., Kumar, S., ... & Kumar, R.
(2022). Probiotics in fermented products and supplements. In Current Developments in
Biotechnology and Bioengineering (pp. 73-107). Elsevier.
Birikan, M. A. (2022). Isolation of Lactic acid Bacteria from raw and fermented camel milk and
Assessment of their antagonistic effect on selected spoilage and food borne bacterial
pathogens in Jigjiga city, Somali, Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, HU).
Chibuzor-Onyema, I. E., Ezeokoli, O. T., Sulyok, M., Notununu, I., Petchkongkaew, A., Elliott,
C. T., & Ezekiel, C. N. (2021). Metataxonomic analysis of bacterial communities and
mycotoxin reduction during processing of three millet varieties into ogi, a fermented
cereal beverage. Food Research International, 143, 110241.
40
De Vries-Ten Have, J., Owolabi, A., Steijns, J., Kudla, U., & Melse-Boonstra, A. (2020). Protein
intake adequacy among Nigerian infants, children, adolescents and women and protein
quality of commonly consumed foods. Nutrition research reviews, 33(1), 102-120.
Efiuvwevwer, B. J., Ire, F., & Umokaso, M. M. (2022). Phenotypic and Genotypic
Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts Involved in Spontaneous
Fermentation of ‘Ogi’, A Cereal-porridge Produced in Nigeria. Journal of Advances in
Microbiology, 13-28.
Ekpa, O. (2020). Improvement of maize-based foods in Sub-Saharan Africa (Doctoral
dissertation, Wageningen University and Research).
Ekpa, O., Palacios-Rojas, N., Kruseman, G., Fogliano, V., & Linnemann, A. R. (2019). Sub-
Saharan African maize-based foods-processing practices, challenges and
opportunities. Food Reviews International, 35(7), 609-639.
Gänzle, M. G. (2015). Lactic metabolism revisited: metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food
fermentations and food spoilage. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2, 106-117.
Gupta, V., Garg, R., Khanna, G., & Parkash, V. (2019). Probiotics: An emerging food
supplement with health benefits. Food Bioconversion, 1(1), 2.
Haas, C. N., Rose, J. B., & Gerba, C. P. (2014). Quantitative microbial risk assessment. John
Wiley & Sons.
Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G. R., Merenstein, D. J., Pot, B., ... & Sanders, M. E.
(2014). Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for
Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the
term probiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11(8), 506-514.
Hols, P., Hancy, F., Fontaine, L., Grossiord, B., Prozzi, D., Leblond-Bourget, N., ... & Bolotin,
A. (2015). New insights in the molecular biology and physiology of Streptococcus
thermophilus revealed by comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 29(3),
435-463.
Igwenyi, I. O., Duru, C. M., & Egesi, C. N. (2019). Nutritional evaluation of ogi (pap) fortified
with different levels of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis nicoliticus) fish flour. Journal of Food
Science and Technology, 56(2), 1005-1011.
Ijarotimi, S. O., & Keshinro, O. O. (2012). Evaluation of protein quality, in vitro digestibility and
sensory properties of maize pap (ogi) fortified with okra seed meal. Pakistan Journal of
Nutrition, 11(4), 350-356.
Katz, S. (2012). The art of fermentation: An in-depth exploration of essential concepts and
processes from around the world. Chelsea Green Publishing.
Liptáková, D., Matejčeková, Z., & Valík, L. (2017). Lactic acid bacteria and fermentation of
cereals and pseudocereals. Fermentation processes, 10, 65459.
Maluleke, E. (2019). Characterisation of the microorganisms and determination of the chemical
constituents of Marula brews during fermentation (Doctoral dissertation).
41
Marco, M. L., & Sanders, M. E. (2019). Gastrointestinal microbiota and its role in human health.
In Lactic Acid Bacteria (pp. 3-16). CRC Press.
Marco, M. L., Heeney, D., Binda, S., Cifelli, C. J., Cotter, P. D., Foligné, B., & Hill, C. (2021).
Fermentation in food science and nutrition–a comprehensive review. Comprehensive
Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 20(1), 317-377.
Obizoba, I. C., & Atii, J. C. (2006). Evaluation of the nutritional quality and functional
properties of okra seed (Hibiscus esculentus) protein concentrates. Pakistan Journal of
Nutrition, 5(1), 63-69.
Odunfa, S. A., & Adeyele, S. (2015). Microbiological changes during the traditional production
of ogi-baba, a West African fermented sorghum gruel. Journal of Cereal Science, 3(2),
173-180.
Oduro, I., Ellis, W. O., & Owusu, D. (2000). Nutritional and anti-nutritional content of
Aspergillus niger-fermented cereal-legume weaning blends. Plant Foods for Human
Nutrition, 55(1), 29-42.
Ogunbanwo, S. T., Sanni, A. I., & Onilude, A. A. (2003). Characterization of bacteriocin
produced by Lacticbacillus plantarum F1 and Lacticbacillus brevis OG1. African Journal
of Biotechnology, 2(10), 273-277.
Ogunbanwo, S. T., Sanni, A. I., & Onilude, A. A. (2013). Characterization of bacteriocin
produced by Lacticbacillus plantarum F1 and Lacticbacillus brevis OG1. African Journal
of Biotechnology, 2(10), 273-277.
Okafor, U. I., Nwosu, J. N., & Omemu, A. M. (2018). Fermentation dynamics and microbial
succession of ogi, a cereal-based fermented food of West Africa. Food Microbiology, 72,
103-111.
Okoronkwo, E. A., Ogunbanwo, S. T., & Abiodun, O. A. (2015). Evaluation of microbial load of
raw and fermented maize during the preparation of "Ogi" in Nigeria. Food Control, 56,
27-32.
Olukoya D. K, Ebigwei S. I, Olasupo N. A, Ogunjimi A. A. (2014). Production of Dogik: an
improved ogi (a Nigerian fermented weaning food) with potentials for use in diarrhoea
control. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 40:108-113.
Oluwafemi, F., Bamgboye, A. I., & Odunfa, S. A. (2008). Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts
associated with spontaneous fermentation of maize, millet and sorghum for production of
Ogi in Nigeria. Food Control, 19(6), 647-652.
Oluwole, O. B., & Sanni, L. O. (2014). Dietary fortification of sorghum-ogi using crayfish
(Paranephrops planifrons) as supplements in infancy. Food Science and Quality
Management, 28, 39-44.
Oluwole, O. B., Olawoye, A. R., & Akinola, S. A. (2019). Development and quality evaluation
of protein-enriched soy-ogi. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(3), e13847.
42
Omemu, A. M., Bankole, M. O., & Oyewole, O. B. (2005). Dynamic changes in microflora and
physicochemical properties of ogi, a fermented cereal gruel. Food Microbiology, 22(4),
373-378.
Omemu, A. M., Bankole, M. O., & Oyewole, O. B. (2007). Dynamics of lactic acid bacteria in
cassava fermentation for ‘‘fufu’’ production. Food Microbiology, 24(4), 325-329.
Oyedeji, A. B., Green, E., Jeff-Agboola, Y. A., Olanbiwoninu, A. A., Areo, E., Martins, I. E., ...
& Adebo, O. A. (2023). Presence of pathogenic microorganisms in fermented foods.
In Indigenous Fermented Foods for the Tropics (pp. 519-537). Academic Press.
Oyewole, O. B., & Sanni, A. I. (2008). Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) as a substrate for ogi
production. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 6(2), 147-150.
Oyewole, O. B., & Sanni, A. I. (2008). Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) as a substrate for ogi
production. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 6(2), 147-150.
Oyewole, O. B., Sanni, L. O., & Ogunbanwo, S. T. (2010). Co-fermentation of maize/cowpea
and sorghum/cowpea ogi as instant complementary food. African Journal of Food
Science, 4(6), 318-326.
Rashwan, A. K., Yones, H. A., Karim, N., Taha, E. M., & Chen, W. (2021). Potential processing
technologies for developing sorghum-based food products: An update and comprehensive
review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 110, 168-182.
Rawat, S. (2015). Food Spoilage: Microorganisms and their prevention. Asian journal of plant
science and Research, 5(4), 47-56.
Sala, S., McLaren, S. J., Notarnicola, B., Saouter, E., & Sonesson, U. (2017). In quest of
reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption. Journal of
cleaner production, 140, 387-398.
Salami O. O, Banjoko O. J, Odusola K. B. (2015). Hazard analysis and critical control point
(HACCP) of ogi (cornmeal) as affected by handlers hygiene. International Journal of
Recent Scientific Research. 2015;6(7): 4900-4907.
Schloss, P. D. (2019). Handcrafted microbes: a closer look at artisanal fermented foods and
beverages. ACS Publications.
Sharma, R., Garg, P., Kumar, P., Bhatia, S. K., & Kulshrestha, S. (2020). Microbial fermentation
and its role in quality improvement of fermented foods. Fermentation, 6(4), 106.
Steinkraus, K. H. (2017). Fermentations in world food processing. Comprehensive Reviews in
Food Science and Food Safety, 2(1), 23-32.
Tournas, V. H., & Katsoudas, E. (2015). Microbiological quality of naturally fermented Greek-
style black and green olives from California in relation to packaging and storage
conditions. Food Microbiology, 50, 125-132.
Turroni, F., Ventura, M., Butto, L. F., Duranti, S., O'Toole, P. W., Motherway, M. O. C., ... &
van Sinderen, D. (2014). Molecular dialogue between the human gut microbiota and the
43
host: a Lacticbacillus and Bifidobacterium perspective. Cellular and Molecular Life
Sciences, 71(2), 183-203.
Tyson, K. (2020). Antimicrobial properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented foods
and drink (Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University. MSc by
Research).
Valero-Cases, E., Cerdá-Bernad, D., Pastor, J. J., & Frutos, M. J. (2020). Non-dairy fermented
beverages as potential carriers to ensure probiotics, prebiotics, and bioactive compounds
arrival to the gut and their health benefits. Nutrients, 12(6), 1666.
44