Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shot Peening
Shot Peening
Shot Peening
R . K . Pandey M. N. Deshmukh
Department of Applied Mechanics
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
INTRODUCTION
Material parameters
These i n c l u d e m i c r o s t r u c t u r e , hardness, s u r f a c e c o n d i t i o n
and h a r d e n i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e m a t e r i a l . T h e r e s u l t o f
t h e i r i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h t h e s h o t peening p a r a m e t e r s is:
0 g e n e r a t i o n o f r e s i d u a l stresses
0 s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g o f t h e s u r f a c e and s u b - s u r f a c e layers
0 c h a n g e s i n m i c r o s t r u c t u r e and s u b s t r u c t u r e o f m a t e r i a l
0 change i n surface conditions
T h e b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t o f s h o t p e e n i n g d e p e n d s o n the
following effects:
8 n a t u r e o f d i s t r i b u t i o n o f i n d u c e d residual stress
0 level o f m a x i m u m c o m p r e s s i v e residual s t r e s s ( C R S )
0 l o c a t i o n o f t h e maximum CRS
0 d e p t h o f p l a s t i c a l l y d e f o r m e d layer
h n e s s c a u s e d by s h o t
f resid~nalstre
S O M E C O M M O N EFFECTS OF SHOT PEENING
Surface I Subsurface deformation
W h e n individual particles i n a high velocity stream contact
a m e t a l surface, t h e y produce slight rounded depressions i n
t h e surface, stretching i t and causing plastic flow o f surface
m e t a l a t t h e instant o f contact.The effect usually extends
t o a b o u t 0 . 1 2 - 0 . 2 5 m m b e l o w t h e surface. T h e m e t a l b e n e a t h
Surface Finish
S h o t peening m a y also be used t o enhance t h e s u r f a c e f i n i s h
o f a c o m p o n e n t . It is k n o w n t h a t t h e s u r f a c e f i n i s h has
considerable effect o n fatigue strength and corrosion
c r a c k i n g r e s i s t a n c e o f alloys. To i m p r o v e t h e s u r f a c e f i n i s h
a d o u b l e s h o t peening o p e r a t i o n m a y b e r e q u i r e d i n w h i c h a
heavy shot peening operation is followed b y a micro-ball
s h o t p e e n i n g o p e r a t i o n . S o m e t i m e s t h e s u r f a c e i's also
s u b j e c t e d t o c h e m i c a l or electrochemical p o l i s h i n g after s h o t
peening t o i m p r o v e t h e surface finish. The surface roughness
increases w i t h increase i n Almen intensity caused by
increasing v e l o c i t y ( F i g . 2 a ) . Also a greater increase i n surface
r o u g h n e s s is n o t i c e d i n t h e m a t e r i a l w i t h l o w e r hardness
level. The e f f e c t o f s h o t size o n surface roughness, h o w e v e r ,
is n o t v e r y clear. For a n y g i v e n m a t e r i a l hardness, t h e r e is
I I
so o Hoo MOO ' 0.4 0.6 0.8
Projection Velocity (RPM) Shot Dia (mm)
(a) (b)
a n o p t i m u m b a l l d i a m e t e r ( s h o t size) t h a t r e p r e s e n t s t h e b e s t
surface finish obtainable(Fig,2b)[3].
W i t h i n c r e a s i n g p r o j e c t i o n v e l o c i t y (i.e. A l m e n i n t e n s i t y ) ,
t h e r e s i d u a l s t r e s s g r a d i e n t decreases. T h e h a r d n e s s o f s h o t
peened material also a f f e c t s t h e residual stress distribution.
I n a m a t e r i a l w i t h l o w e r hardness, t h e m a x i m u m c o m p r e s s i v e
residual stress increases w i t h projection velocity more
s i g n i f i c a n t l y t h a n t h e m a t e r i a l w i t h h i g h h a r d n e s s as s h o w n
i n Fig.1 c.[2].
T h e e f f e c t o f s h o t size o n r e s i d u a l s t r e s s d i s t r i b u t i o n i s
s i m i l a r as t h a t o f t h e p r o j e c t i o n v e l o c i t y . A l s o t h e m a x i m u m
s t r e s s increases w i t h increasing hardness o f t h e s h o t m a t e r i a l
a n d s t a b i l i z e s a t a c e r t a i n l e v e l o f s h o t h a r d n e s s as s h o w n
i n Fig.1 b , [ 2 ] .
Depth (rnrn) Dept h(rnrn)
(4 (b)
T h e r e s i d u a l s t r e s s l e v e l d e c r e a s e s as w e l l as t h e v a l u e o f
maximum residual stress reduces after fatigue
c y c l i n g ( F i g . 3 a ) , [ 4 ] . Similarly, w h e n a s h o t peened c o m p o n e n t
i s s u b j e c t e d t o t e m p e r i n g t h e r e is a d e c r e a s e i n t h e l e v e l o f
c o m p r e s s i v e residual stress. H o w e v e r t h e d e p t h o f plasticized
m e t a l r e m a i n s u n c h a n g e d a f t e r s t r e s s reIieving(Fig.3b), [4,5].
SHOT PEENING A N D DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS
T h e n a t u r e o f d e f o r m a t i o n d u r i n g s h o t p e e n i n g is s o m e w h a t
s i m i l a r as t h e d e f o r m a t i o n d u r i n g c y c l i c s t r a i n i n g ( f a t i g u e
c y c l i n g ) . During t h e cyclic straining o f s o f t materials, t h e
s u b g r a i n size is d e c r e a s e d w i t h i n c r e a s e i n s t r a i n i n g [ 6 ] .
L a t t i c e d i s t o r t i o n a n d d i s l o c a t i o n d e n s i t y is i n c r e a s e d a n d
t h u s 'cyclic hardening' occurs. However, f o r hardened (or
c o l d w o r k e d ) materials, during cyclic straining t h e excess
d i s l o c a t i o n s are a n n i h i l a t e d , t h e g r o w t h o f s u b g r a i n o c c u r s
and decrease o f lattice d i s t o r t i o n and dislocation density
t a k e s place. C o n s e q u e n t l y , c y c l i c s o f t e n i n g is developed. T h e
nature o f plastic d e f o r m a t i o n i n case o f s h o t peening has
t w o important differences w i t h respect t o the cyclic
d e f o r m a t i o n . T h e s e are as f o l l o w s :
( i ) In- c a s e o f h a r d m a t e r i a l s , t h e " c y c l i c s o f t e n i n g ' i s f u r t h e r
f o l l o w e d b y "cyclic rehardening" a t a later stage o f s h o t
p e e n i n g . T h i s r e s u l t s in a " h a r d e n e d " layer a t t h e s u r f a c e
a n d "softened" layer beneath t h e surface. T h e hardened
surface layer helps t o i m p r o v e t h e f a t i g u e life w h e n
combined w i t h residual compressive stress.
(ii) I n case o f t h e s o f t materials, (annealed steels, Al-alloys,
stainless steels), t h e plastic deformation d u e t o cyclic
l o a d i n g is i n h o m o g e n e o u s i n n a t u r e a n d c a n p r o d u c e
m i c r o c r a c k s . O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e slippage d u r i n g s h o t
p e e n i n g is o f h o m o g e n e o u s t y p e i n t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r a n d
thus promotes hardening w i t h o u t tendency for crack
nucleation.
S H O T PEENING A N D MICROSTRUCTURAL C H A N G E S
T h e deformation produced b y s h o t peening m a y bring a
favourable or unfavourable phase transformation. The
resulting microstructure m a y improve t h e desired properties
or cause deterioration. A f e w examples f r o m d i f f e r e n t
m a t e r i a l s are d i s c u s s e d b e l o w .
Effect of Shot Peening on a Carbonitrided case
T h e carbonitrided case o f t y p i c a l l o w alloy steel (e.g. 1 6 M n
C r l ) contains substantial proportion o f retained austenite
( 5 0 % ) after t h e t r e a t m e n t besides t h e martensite, W i t h
i n c r e a s i n g d u r a t i o n o f s h o t p e e n i n g o f t h e case, t h e a u s t e n i t e
is converted i n t o rnartensite(M) and compressive residual
s t r e s s e s are g e n e r a t e d d u e t o t h i s t r a n s f o r m a t i o n . T h e
h a r d n e s s o f t h e c a s e i n c r e a s e s d u e t o M f o r m a t i o n as w e l l
as d u e t o w o r k h a r d e n i n g o f a u s t e n i t e a n d m a r t e n s i t e . T h e
s u r f a c e r o u g h n e s s i s also f o u n d t o d e c r e a s e f r o m 7 t o 3 p m .
All these factors lead t o substantial improvement in t h e
f a t i g u e life of t h e case.
E f f e c t of Shot Peening in a Carburized Case and i n an
Austenitic stainless steel.
In a carburized steel ( 4 3 2 0 steel), s o m e o f t h e retained
a u s t e n i t e is c o n v e r t e d t o m a r t e n s i t e b y s h o t p e e n i n g a n d
introduces a compressive residual stress. This increases t h e
f a t i g u e s t r e n g t h as described earlier. I n an a u s t e n i t i c stainless
-600 1 1
1.0
L
2 -O
1
3.0
Depth (mm)
Fig.4 Distribution of residual stresses and retained austenite in as
carburized and shot peened-carburized steel.
W h e r e N i i s t h e f a t i g u e i n i t i a t i o n l i f e a n d A, B, a a n d b are
c o n s t a n t s depending o n experimental and material conditions
like y i e l d s t r e n g t h , s u r f a c e r o u g h n e s s e t c . In l o w s t r e n g t h
materials, t h e residual compressive stresses m a y g e t relaxed
w h e n t h e m a t e r i a l yields i n h i g h l y loaded zone (i.e, n o t c h )
w h i c h i s especially t r u e i n r a n d o m l o a d i n g c y c l e . Therefore,
t h e m a x i m u m gain may be achieved f r o m residual
c o m p r e s s i v e stresses i n t h e h i g h c y c l e r e g i o n o f S-N c u r v e
o f a h i g h s t r e n g t h m a t e r i a l a n d m i n i m u m gain i n case o f l o w
strength material i n finite life region o f S-N curve.
A c o m p a r i s o n o f t h r e e m a t e r i a l s i.e. A l - a l l o y ( 5 0 0 M p a yield
s t r e n g t h ) , T i alloy ( 1 1 5 0 M P a ) and m a r a g i n g s t e e l ( 2 1 5 0
M P a ) w h e n s u b j e c t e d t o equivalent stress level (omax applied1
t e n s i l e s t r e n g t h = 0 . 9 ) , s h o w e d t h a t f o r o p t i m u m peening
intensity, t h e m a x i m u m fatigue life improvement factor was
greater t h a n 10 f o r t h e l a s t t w o alloys, w h e r e a s it w a s o n l y
2 . 5 i n c a s e o f Al-alloy. T h i s i s explained by presence o f
l a r g e and s t a b l e residual c o m p r e s s i v e s t r e s s e s i n T i a l l o y
and m a r a g i n g steel as c o m p a r e d t o a r a p i d l y r e l a x i n g one in
Al-all-oy. T h e h i g h c o m p r e s s i v e residual s t r e s s m a y e n h a n c e
t h e c r a c k p r o p a g a t i o n l i f e b y decreasing t h e e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s
i n t e n s i t y range.
I n general l i g h t e r p e e n i n g m e d i a like h a r d p l a s t i c s , g l a s s or
c e r a m i c beads, m a y d r a m a t i c a l l y i m p r o v e t h e f a t i g u e
p e r f o r m a n c e as c o m p a r e d t o steel s h o t s and t h e r e b y r e d u c e
t h e s c a t t e r . Especially i n t h e case o f a l u m i n i u m alloys, steel
shot peening can be quite detrimental t o t h e fatigue
p e r f o r m a n c e and n e e d s o p t i m i z i n g and m o n i t o r i n g o f t h e
shot peening parameters due t o relative softness.
Uncontrolled peeninghepeening may introduce surface
damage, w h i c h c a n promote f a t i g u e c r a c k i n g [ l 0 , l I ] .
Life prediction
T h e P a l i s e q u a t i o n d e s c r i b e s t h e s t a g e II c r a c k g r o w t h
behaviour d u r i n g f a t i g u e i n m e t a l l i c materials, and c a n be
used f o r evaluation o f c r a c k p r o p a g a t i o n l i f e .
da / d N = C(AK)"
Where ' d a 1 d N r is t h e c r a c k g r o w t h r a t e . 'AK' is t h e range
- Kmi,) and C and n are
o f s t r e s s i n t e n s i t y f a c t o r (AK = KmaX
t h e Paris c o n s t a n t s .
Since t h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f t h e c o n c e p t o f c r a c k c l o s u r e b y
E l b e r [ l 51, t h e r e is a c o m m o n l y a c c e p t e d m o d i f i c a t i o n i n t h e
Paris l a w i.e. u s i n g AKeff i n place o f AK.
I t appears t o b e c e h a i n t h a t t h e c h a n g i n g b e h a v i o u r o f t h e
c r a c k g r o w t h r a t e i n t h e peened c o m p o n e n t s i s d u e t o t h e
higher c r a c k o p e n i n g levels, r e s u l t i n g i n l o w e r A K e f f , w h e r e
AKef, is expressed as,
-
t
Q
-
i
0
-
I
-
1
0,
-
0 X 0 %
0 0
.b
0
0
REFERENCES
1. S h o t peening, M e t a l s Handbook, Vo12, 8 t h ed., A S M ,
M e t a l s Park, OH.
2. S h o t peening applications, A S M C o m m i t t e e o n S h o t
peening, ( M e t a l s i m p r o v e m e n t Co.), 1 9 7 7 , 5 t h ed.
3. SAE M a n u a l o n S h o t peening, SAE, J 9 0 8 a , 1 9 6 7 .
4. Roth, M . , Thermal s t a b i l i t y o f residual stresses i n s h o t
peened surface, i n M e t a l Treatments against wear,
corrosion, f r e t t i n g a n d f a t i g u e . A d v a n c e s i n s u r f a c e
Treatments, Vo16, R.B.Waterhouse and A.Nikulari(Eds.)
Pergmon, pp; 1 0 9 - 1 1 5 .
5. Nikulari, A , , S h o t peening i n Proc. First I n t . C o n f . o n
S h o t Peening.(lCSP-P), Paris, A.Nikulari(Ed.), Pergmon,
pp.1-21.
6 Dieter, G.E., Mechanical Metallurgy, 3 r d ed. McGrawHill.,
pp.387-390.
7. Kirk, D., Residual s t r e s s e s a n d retained A u s t e n i t e i n
s h o t peened steels, Proc.lCSP1, p p . 2 7 1 .
8. Sharp, P.K., Clark, G. a n d Clayton, J.Q. T h e fatigue
resistance o f peened 7 0 7 5 - T 7 4 5 1 aluminium alloy -
repair and t r e a t m e n t o f a c o m p o n e n t s u r f a c e . Fatigue
F r a c t . E n g n g . M a t e r . S t r u c t . , Vo1.17, N o . 3 , 1994,
pp.243-252.
9. Clark,G a n d C l a y t o n , J.Q. E f f e c t i v e n e s s o f p e e n i n g
treatments i n improving fatigue resistance o f 7 0 5 0
a l u m i n i u m alloy under c o n s t a n t a m p l i t u d e and s p e c t r u m
loading. A u s . Surface Engng. Conf., Tech. Search,
University of south Australia, 1 9 8 8 , p I 3 1 1.
1 0 . Clark, G . and C l a y t o n , J . O . T h e e f f e c t o f s t e e l s h o t a n d
glass beads peening t r e a t m e n t o n t h e f a t i g u e resistance
o f 7 0 7 5 - T 7 6 3 5 1 a l u m i n i u m alloy. P r o c . A u s t . F r a c t u r e
Group, M e l b o u r n , 1 9 8 8 , p p . 4 4 - 5 1 .
1 I.M u t o h , Y., Gair, G.H, a n d Waterhouse, R.B., T h e e f f e c t
o f residual stresses i n d u c e d b y s h o t p e e n i n g o n f a t i g u e
crack propagation i n t w o high strength Aluminium
a l l o y s . Fatigue f r a c t . E n g n g . M a t e r . S t r u c t . , V o l . 1 0 ,
No.4,l 987,pp261-272.
1 2 . S h a w , W . J . D . , Zhu, X . Y . and Derry,R., ' C r a c k c l o s u r e
p r o p a g a t i o n r a t e s as a f f e c t e d b y v a r i o u s c o n d i t i o n s of
surface residual stress. Proceedings o f lnternational
Fatigue Series 2 . M o n t r e a l , 1 9 9 3 , Canada p p 6 9 9 - 7 0 3 .
1 3 . Lyod, J.R.T., Residual s t r e s s and c r a c k c l o s u r e e f f e c t s
o n fatigue crack g r w t h i n a s t r u c t u r a l metal. Proceedings
o f I n t e r n a t i o n a l F a t i g u e ~ e 6 e s1 . 1 9 9 3 , M o n t r e a l ,
Canada p p 5 8 9 - 5 9 5 .
1 4 . Zhu, X.Y. a n d S h a w , W . J . D . , C o r r e l a t i o n o f f a t i g u e
crack g r o w t h behaviour w i t h crack c r a c k closure in
peened specimens, Fatigue Fract. Engng. M a t e r . Struct.,
V o l . 1 8 , 1 9 9 5 , p p . 8 1 1-820.
1 5 . E l b e r , W., E n g i n e e r i n g Fracture Mechanics,
Vol.2,I 97o,pp37-45.
1 6 . Meguid, S.A., Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1 9 8 9 ,
Elsevier Science publishers Ltd., London and N e w York.
1 7. Misumi, M., e t al. Effect o f shot pening o n surface crack
propagation i n plane-bending fatigue in: Advances i n
Treatmen.tl Technology Application Effect
Program,1988, O x f o r d and N e w York, p p . 5 5 - 6 2 .
1 8 . Sharma, M.C., Shot peening and f r a c t u r e behaviour
1 9 8 8 , Ph.D. thesis, University o f Bhopal, India.
1 9 . 2 8 . Paul, G., e t al., Second international conference o n
s h o t peenirig, 1 9 8 4 , Chicago:21 .