Taxation of Business Entities 2019 Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions Manual

Taxation of Business Entities 2019
Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions

Manual
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankdeal.com/dow
nload/taxation-of-business-entities-2019-edition-10th-edition-spilker-solutions-manual/
Solutions Manual - Taxation of Business Entities, by Spilker et al.
Chapter 7
Corporate Taxation: Nonliquidating Distributions
1. [LO1] What is meant by the term double taxation of corporate income?

The term double taxation refers to the fact that under the U.S. system of taxation,
corporate earnings are first taxed when earned by a C corporation and then are taxed a
second time when the earnings are distributed to the shareholders as a dividend.
2. [LO1] How does the double taxation of corporate distributions affect whether an individual
chooses to operate a business as a C corporation or as flow-through entity??
A distribution of corporate income characterized as a dividend is subject to double
taxation, first at the corporate level (21 percent) and then a second time at the shareholder
level as a dividend. However, the double tax may be preferable because the tax rate at
both levels can substantially below the regular individual tax rate. A distribution from a
flow-through entity is only taxed once but at the regular tax rate (potentially, 37 percent).
3. [LO1] Why might a shareholder who is also an employee prefer receiving a dividend
instead of compensation from a corporation?
An individual shareholder might prefer a dividend to compensation because, although the
dividend is subject to double taxation, both corporate tax rate and the dividend rate can be
substantially below the single tax on compensation. For example, the corporate tax rate is
21 percent and the dividend is taxed at 20 percent (ignoring net investment income tax).
Whereas,compensation can be taxed at the relatively high ordinary tax rates (37 percent)
plus the federal social security (FICA) taxes..
4. [LO2] What are the three potential tax treatments of a cash distribution to a shareholder?
Are these potential tax treatments elective by the shareholder?
A cash distribution to a shareholder can be characterized as 1) dividend to the extent of
earnings and profits, 2) tax-free return of capital to the extent of the shareholder’s tax
basis in the stock, or 3) gain from sale of the stock (capital gain). The tax law (section
301(c)) prescribes the tax treatment of the distribution; it is not elective by the
shareholder.
5. [LO2] In general, what is the concept of earnings and profits designed to represent?
Earnings and profits is intended to represent the corporation’s ability to pay distributions
to its shareholders without eroding its invested capital. Earnings and profits is designed to
reflect the corporation’s economic income, a broader concept than its taxable income.
6. [LO2] How does current earnings and profits account differ from accumulated earnings
and profits account? Is there any congressional logic for keeping the two accounts
separate?
Current earnings and profits represents the corporation’s earnings and profits of the
Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
current year before reduction (“diminution”) by any distributions made during the year.
Accumulated earnings and profits represents undistributed earnings and profits from all
years prior to the current year. Congress created this distinction in 1936 when distributed
current year earnings were taxed at the corporate level at a lower rate than undistributed
earnings. This dual level of taxation was repealed in 1939, but the congressional
distinction between current and accumulated earnings and profits remained in the law.
7. [LO2] Assume a calendar-year corporation has positive current E&P of $100 and an
accumulated deficit (negative) E&P of $200. In this circumstance, a cash distribution of
$100 to the corporation’s sole shareholder at year-end will not be treated as a dividend
because total E&P is negative $100. True or false? Explain.
False. The $100 distribution will be treated as a dividend because it does not exceed
current earnings and profits.
8. [LO2] Assume a calendar-year corporation has a deficit (negative) current E&P of $100
and accumulated E&P of $100. Under this circumstance, a cash distribution of $100 to the
corporation’s sole shareholder on June 30 will not be treated as a dividend because total
E&P at December 31 is $0. True or false? Explain.
False. A portion of the distribution could be treated as a dividend based on accumulated
earnings and profits on June 30. If the current year deficit is earned ratably over the year,
accumulated earnings and profits on June 30 would be $50 [$100 - 181/365 x ($100)]. A
deficit in current earnings and profits is allocated on a per day basis unless determined by
tracing specific items that caused the deficit.
9. [LO2] List the four basic adjustments that a corporation makes to taxable income or net
loss to compute current E&P. What is the rationale for making these adjustments?
A corporation adjusts its taxable income or loss by the following general items to compute
current E&P:
1. Inclusion of income that is excluded from taxable income
2. Disallowance of certain expenses that are deducted in computing taxable income but do
not require an economic outflow
3. Deduction of certain expenses that are excluded from the computation of taxable
income but do require an economic outflow
4. Deferral of deductions or acceleration of income due to separate accounting methods
required for E&P purposes
10. [LO2] Assuming adequate amounts of corporate E&P, what is the formula for determining
the amount of a noncash distribution a shareholder must include in gross income?
The dividend amount is the fair market value of the property received less any liability
assumed on the property.
11. [LO2] What income tax issues must a corporation consider before it makes a noncash
distribution to a shareholder?
A corporation must determine if the property’s fair market value exceeds or is less than the
property’s tax basis. To the extent the fair market value exceeds the tax basis, the
corporation recognizes gain on the distribution. Corporations cannot recognize loss if the
property’s fair market value is less than the tax basis.
12. [LO2] Will the shareholder’s tax basis in noncash property received equal the amount
included in gross income as a dividend? Under what circumstances will the amounts be
different, if any?
Not always. Where the shareholder assumes a liability attached to the property, the
amount of the dividend income is computed as the property’s fair market value less the
liability assumed (section 301(b)). The shareholder takes a tax basis in the property equal
to its fair market value, not reduced by the liability assumed (section 301(d)).
13. [LO2] A shareholder receives appreciated noncash property in a corporate distribution and
assumes a liability attached to the property. How does the liability assumption affect the
amount of dividend reported in gross income?
The shareholder’s assumption of a liability attached to noncash property reduces the
amount of the dividend income reported.
14. [LO2] A shareholder receives appreciated noncash property in a corporate distribution and
assumes a liability attached to the property. How does this assumption affect the amount
of gain the corporation recognizes? From the corporation’s perspective, does it matter if
the liability assumed by the shareholder exceeds the property’s gross fair market value?
In general, the shareholder’s assumption of a liability attached to appreciated noncash
property distributed as a dividend does not affect the gain recognized by the corporation.
Gain recognized is the property’s fair market value less the property’s tax basis. If the
liability assumed by the shareholder exceeds the property’s fair market value, the property
is deemed to have a fair market value equal to the liability assumed for purposes of
determining the gain recognized by the corporation.
15. [LO2] A corporation distributes depreciated noncash property to a shareholder. What
impact does the distribution have on the corporation’s earnings and profits?
The corporation reduces E&P by the lesser of the property’s E&P adjusted basis, reduced
by any liability assumed by the shareholder on the distribution.
16. [LO3] Why might a corporation issue a stock distribution to its shareholders?
Corporations often issue stock distributions as a goodwill gesture to their shareholders
when they do not have sufficient cash to make a distribution. Many times, corporations
will engage in a stock split to increase the number of shares outstanding and lower the
trading price of the stock to make it more accessible to a broader class of investors.
17. [LO3] What tax issue arises when a shareholder receives a nontaxable stock distribution?
The shareholder must allocate some of the tax basis of the existing stock to the new stock
received based on the relative fair market values of the existing and newly issued stock.
18. [LO3] In general, what causes a stock distribution to be taxable to the recipient?
Stock distributions generally are taxable when they result in, or have the potential to result
in, a change in the proportionate stock ownership of the existing shareholders. For
example, where a shareholder can choose between cash or stock, there exists the
possibility that some shareholders will choose cash and some will choose stock. Those
who choose stock will increase their ownership percentage relative to those who choose
cash. Where stockholders have the ability to choose between cash and stock, the stock
dividend will be taxable to those who choose to receive stock.
19. [LO4] What are the potential tax consequences to a shareholder who participates in a stock
redemption?
A shareholder who participates in a stock redemption potentially could treat the
distribution as an exchange (section 302) or as a property distribution (potentially a
dividend under section 301).
20. [LO4] What stock ownership tests must be met before a shareholder receives exchange
treatment under the substantially disproportionate change-in-stock-ownership test in a
stock redemption? Why is a change-in-stock-ownership test used to determine the tax
status of a stock redemption?
A shareholder meets the substantially disproportionate change-in-stock-ownership test by
satisfying three mechanical stock ownership tests:
1. Immediately after the exchange the shareholder owns less than 50% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote;
2. The shareholder’s percentage ownership of voting stock after the redemption is less
than 80% of his or her percentage ownership before the redemption; and
3. The shareholder’s percentage ownership of the aggregate fair market value of the
corporation’s common stock (voting and nonvoting) after the redemption is less than 80%
of his or her percentage ownership before the redemption.
The Code uses a change in stock ownership test to determine the tax status of a stock
redemption to distinguish between transactions that resemble sales from transactions that
are in substance a dividend distribution (that is, a transaction in which the shareholder
does not meaningfully change her stock ownership in the company).
21. [LO4] What are the criteria to meet the “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” change-
in-stock-ownership test in a stock redemption?
To satisfy the “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” requirement, the IRS or a court
must conclude that there has been a “meaningful” reduction in the shareholder’s
ownership interest in the corporation as a result of the redemption. The Code does not
provide any mechanical tests to make this determination. At a minimum, the IRS and
courts generally require the shareholder to reduce his stock ownership as a result of the
transaction and own 50 percent or less of the stock after the transaction.
22. [LO4] When might a shareholder have to rely on the “not essentially equivalent to a
dividend” test in arguing a stock redemption should be treated as an exchange for tax
purposes?
A shareholder will have to rely on this test if the distribution cannot meet either the
“substantially disproportionate test” or the “complete termination of interest” test, which
rely on a mechanical set of criteria.
23. [LO4] Explain why the tax law imposes constructive stock ownership rules on stock
redemptions.
The tax law imposes constructive ownership tests to prevent a shareholder from
technically disposing of his stock interest while effectively continuing to own stock through
family members or through ownership in an entity that nominally owns the stock.
24. [LO4] Which members of a family are included in the family attribution rules? Is there
any rationale for the family members included in the test?
Family members include spouse, children, parents, and grandchildren. These are the
family members that are the most closely related to the shareholder by blood. Family
members excluded are grandparents, brothers and sisters, aunts and uncles, and nieces,
nephews, and cousins.
25. [LO4] Ilya and Olga are brother and sister. Ilya owns 200 shares of stock in Parker
Corporation. Is Olga deemed to own Ilya’s 200 shares under the family attribution rules
that apply to stock redemptions?
No. A brother and sister are not included under the family attribution rules.
26. [LO4] Maria has all of her stock in Mayan Corporation redeemed. Under what conditions
will Maria treat the redemption as an exchange and recognize capital gain or loss?
Maria will treat the stock redemption as an exchange if she does not own any additional
stock through attribution that causes her to fail either of the other two stock ownership
tests. If she only owns stock constructively through the family attribution rules, she can
waive the family attribution rules by filing a “triple i agreement” with the IRS and avoid
acquiring a prohibited interest in the corporation for 10 years (for example, providing
services to the corporation as an employee or independent contractor).
27. [LO4] What must a shareholder do to waive the family attribution rules in a complete
redemption of stock?
A shareholder must file a “triple i agreement” with the IRS and refrain from having a
prohibited interest (shareholder, employee, director, officer, or consultant) for 10 years.
The shareholder must agree to notify the IRS district director within 30 days if he or she
acquires a prohibited interest within 10 years after the redemption.
28. [LO4] How does a corporation’s computation of earnings and profits differ based on the
tax treatment of a stock redemption to the shareholder (that is, as either a dividend or
exchange)?
If the redemption is treated as a dividend, the corporation reduces E&P using the dividend
reduction rules by generally reducing E&P dollar for dollar by the amount of the dividend.
If the redemption is treated as an exchange, the corporation reduces E&P at the date of
distribution by the percentage of stock redeemed, not to exceed the fair market value of the
property distributed. The distributing corporation reduces its E&P by any dividend
distributions made during the year before reducing its E&P for redemptions treated as
exchanges.
29. [LO5] How does the tax treatment of a partial liquidation differ from a stock redemption?
In a partial liquidation, the shareholders have prescribed tax treatments: individuals
receive exchange treatment and corporations treat the distribution as a dividend to the
extent of earnings and profits. In a stock redemption, each shareholder’s tax treatment
depends on whether a change in stock ownership requirement is met.
30. [LO5] Reveille Corporation experienced a complete loss of its lumber mill as the result of
a fire. The company received $2 million from the insurance company. Rather than
rebuild, Reveille decided to distribute the $2 million to its two shareholders. No stock was
exchanged in return. Under what conditions will the distribution meet the requirements to
be a partial liquidation and not a dividend? Why does it matter to the shareholders?
For a distribution to be in partial liquidation of the corporation, it must either be “not
essentially equivalent to a dividend” (as determined at the corporate level) or be the result
of the termination of a “qualified trade or business.” In this case, the test likely will be
whether the use of the mill constituted a qualified trade or business. The determination
matters most to individuals, who will receive exchange treatment if the transaction is a
partial liquidation and a potential dividend if the transaction is viewed not to be a partial
liquidation.
Problems
31. [LO1] Gopher Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 this year. Gopher paid a
dividend of $100,000 to its sole shareholder, Sven Anderson The dividend meets the
requirements to be a qualified dividend and Sven is subject to a tax rate of 15% on the
dividend. What is the income tax imposed on the corporate income earned by Gopher and
the income tax on the dividend distributed to Sven?
Corporate tax: $500,000  21% $105,000
Shareholder tax: $100,000  15% 15,000
Total income tax $120,000
32. [LO1] Bulldog Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 this year before any
deduction for any payment to its sole shareholder and employee, Georgia Brown. Bulldog
chose to pay a bonus of $100,000 to Georgia at year-end. The bonus meets the
requirements to be “reasonable” and is therefore deductible by Bulldog. Georgia is subject
to a marginal tax rate of 35% on the bonus. What is the income tax imposed on the
corporate income earned by Bulldog and the income tax on the bonus paid to Georgia?
Corporate tax: $400,000  21% $ 84,000

Shareholder tax: $100,000  35% 35,000
Total income tax $119,000
33. [LO2] Hawkeye Company reports current E&P of $300,000 this year and accumulated
E&P at the beginning of the year of $200,000. Hawkeye distributed $400,000 to its sole
shareholder, Ray Kinsella, on December 31 of this year. Ray’s tax basis in his Hawkeye
stock is $75,000.
a. How much of the $400,000 distribution is treated as a dividend to Ray?
All $400,000 is treated as a dividend because the distribution is less than the
company’s total earnings and profits of $500,000.
b. What is Ray’s tax basis in his Hawkeye stock after the distribution?
Ray’s tax basis in his Hawkeye stock remains $75,000.
c. What is Hawkeye’s balance in accumulated E&P as of January 1 of next year?
Accumulated E&P as of January 1 is $100,000, computed as $500,000 - $400,000.
34. [LO2] Jayhawk Company reports current E&P of $300,000 and accumulated E&P of
negative $200,000. Jayhawk distributed $400,000 to its sole shareholder, Christine Rock,
on the last day of the year. Christine’s tax basis in her Jayhawk stock is $75,000.
a. How much of the $400,000 distribution is treated as a dividend to Christine?
Christine has dividend income of $300,000, all of which is from the company’s
current E&P.
b. What is Christine’s tax basis in her Jayhawk stock after the distribution?
Christine reduces her tax basis in the Jayhawk stock by $75,000 to $0, which is the
lesser of the distribution in excess of current E&P ($100,000) or her basis in the
Jayhawk stock ($75,000). The remaining $25,000 is treated as gain from sale of the
Jayhawk stock (capital gain).
c. What is Jayhawk’s balance in accumulated E&P on the first day of next year?
Jayhawk has a deficit in accumulated E&P of negative $200,000. Current E&P was
reduced to $0, leaving a carryover of the beginning of the year accumulated E&P.
35. [LO2] This year Sooner Company reports current E&P of negative $300,000. Its
accumulated E&P at the beginning of the year was $200,000. Sooner distributed $400,000
to its sole shareholder, Boomer Wells, on June 30 of this year. Boomer’s tax basis in his
Sooner stock is $75,000.
a. How much of the $400,000 distribution is treated as a dividend to Boomer?
Boomer reports a dividend of $50,000. He first computes balance in E&P as of June

30 by allocating the deficit in current E&P pro rata over the year. The deficit in
current E&P on June 30 is negative $150,000, computed as [($300,000) x 6/12].
Hence, accumulated E&P as of June 30 is $50,000, computed as $200,000 -
$150,000.
b. What is Boomer’s tax basis in his Sooner stock after the distribution?
Boomer’s tax basis in his Sooner stock is $0, which is his beginning tax basis of
$75,000 less the lesser of the distribution in excess of accumulated E&P ($350,000)
or his basis in the Sooner stock ($75,000). The remaining $275,000 is treated as
gain from sale of the Sooner stock (capital gain).
c. What is Sooner’s balance in accumulated E&P on the first day of next year?
Sooner’s balance in accumulated E&P is $(150,000), computed as follows:
Accumulated E&P, beginning of this year $200,000
Current E&P (300,000)
Dividend paid ( 50,000)
Accumulated E&P, end of the year $(150,000)
The deficit equals the deficit in current E&P that arose after the dividend
payment [($300,000) x 6/12].
36. [LO2] This year Bobcat Company reports current E&P of negative $300,000 that accrued
evenly throughout the year. At the beginning of the year, Bobcat’s accumulated E&P was a
$200,000. Bobcat distributed $200,000 to its sole shareholder, Melanie Rushmore, on June
30 of this year. Melanie’s tax basis in her Bobcat stock was $75,000.
a. How much of the $200,000 distribution is treated as a dividend to Melanie?
$50,000. Dividend treatment depends on the total E&P on the distribution date. On
June 30 Bobcat had accrued negative current E&P for $150,000 and when combined
with the accumulated E&P of $200,000, this resulted in total E&P of $50,000.
b. What is Melanie’s tax basis in her Bobcat stock after the distribution?
Melanie’s tax basis in her Bobcat stock is $25,000, which is her beginning tax basis
($75,000) less the distribution in excess of accumulated E&P ($200,000-$150,000 =
$50,000).
c. What is Bobcat’s balance in accumulated E&P on the first day of next year?
Negative accumulated E&P of $150,000. At year end, the remaining deficit of
$150,000 had accrued in current E&P resulting in a deficit in the beginning balance
in accumulated E&P for the next year.
37. [LO2] This year Jolt Inc. reported $40,000 of taxable income before any charitable
contribution deduction. Jolt contributed $10,000 this year to Goodwill Industries, a public
charity. Compute the company’s current E&P.
Taxable income before charitable contribution deduction $40,000
Charitable contribution limited to 10% of taxable income 4,000
Taxable Income $36,000
Federal income taxes $5,400
Taxable income $36,000

Less Charitable contribution carryover (6,000)
Less Federal income taxes ($36,000 x 21%) (7,560)
Current E&P $22,440
38. [LO2] Boilermaker, Inc. reported taxable income of $500,000 this year and paid federal
income taxes of $105,000. Not included in the company’s computation of taxable income
is tax-exempt income of $20,000, disallowed meals and entertainment expenses of
$30,000, and disallowed expenses related to the tax-exempt income of $1,000.
Boilermaker deducted depreciation of $100,000 on its tax return. Under the alternative
(E&P) depreciation method, the deduction would have been $60,000. Compute the
company’s current E&P.
Add:
Tax-exempt interest 20,000
Excess of regular tax deprecation over E&P depreciation 40,000
Subtract:
Federal income taxes (105,000)
Disallowed portion of meals and entertainment (30,000)
Disallowed expenses related to tax-exempt income ( 1,000)
Current E&P $424,000
39. [LO2] Gator, Inc. reported taxable income of $1,000,000 this year and paid federal income
taxes of $210,000. Included in the company’s computation of taxable income is gain from
sale of a depreciable asset of $50,000. The income tax basis of the asset was $100,000.
The E&P basis of the asset using the alternative depreciation system was $175,000.
Compute the company’s current E&P.
Taxable income $1,000,000

Subtract:
Federal income taxes (210 000)
Regular tax gain from sale of asset ($150,000 - $100,000) ( 50,000)
E&P loss from sale of asset ($150,000 - $175,000) ( 25,000)
40. [LO2] Paladin, Inc. reported taxable income of $1,000,000 this year and paid federal
income taxes of 210,000. The company reported a capital gain from sale of investments of
$150,000, which was partially offset by a $100,000 net capital loss carryover from last
year, resulting in a net capital gain of $50,000 included in taxable income. Compute the
company’s current E&P.
Add:
NCL carryover 100,000
Subtract:
Federal income taxes (210,000)
41. [LO2] Volunteer Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 from operations for this
year. During the year, the company made a distribution of land to its sole shareholder,
Rocky Topp. The land’s fair market value was $75,000 and its tax and E&P basis to
Volunteer was $25,000. Rocky assumed a mortgage attached to the land of $15,000. Any
gain from the distribution will be taxed at 21 percent. The company had accumulated E&P
of $750,000 at the beginning of the year.
a. Compute Volunteer’s total taxable income and federal income tax.
Taxable income from operations $500,000
Gain on distribution of land ($75,000 - $25,000) 50,000
Total taxable income $550,000
Federal income tax ($550,000 x 21%) $115,500
b. Compute Volunteer’s current E&P.

Subtract:
Federal income tax (115,500)
Adjustment for E&P gain on distribution of land ( 0)
c. Compute Volunteer’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

Subtract:
Fair market value of land distributed this year (75,000)
Add:
Mortgage assumed by Rocky 15,000
Current E&P after distribution $374,500
Accumulated E&P, beginning of this year 750,000
Accumulated E&P, beginning of next year $1,124,500
d. What amount of dividend income does Rocky report as a result of the distribution?
Rocky reports dividend income of $60,000, computed as the fair market value of the
land received ($75,000) less the liability he assumes ($15,000).
e. What is Rocky’s income tax basis in the land received from Volunteer?
$75,000. Rocky’s income tax basis in the land equals its fair market value.
42. [LO2] Tiger Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 from operations for this
year. During the year, the company made a distribution of land to its sole shareholder,
Mike Fairway. The land’s fair market value was $75,000 and its tax and E&P basis to
Tiger was $125,000. Mike assumed a mortgage attached to the land of $15,000. Any gain
from the distribution will be taxed at 21 percent. The company had accumulated E&P of
$750,000 at the beginning of the year.
a. Compute Tiger’s total taxable income and federal income tax.
Loss on distribution of land ($75,000 - $125,000)* 0
* Loss on a distribution of property is not recognized.
b. Compute Tiger’s current E&P.

Subtract:
Adjustment for E&P loss on distribution of land ( 0)
c. Compute Tiger’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

Subtract:
E&P basis of land distributed this year (125,000)
Add:
Mortgage assumed by Mike 15,000
CE&P after distribution $285,000
Accumulated E&P, beginning of this year 750,000
d. What amount of dividend income does Mike report as a result of the distribution?
Mike reports dividend income of $60,000, computed as the fair market value of the
land received ($75,000) less the liability he assumes ($15,000).
e. What is Mike’s tax basis in the land he received from Tiger?
$75,000. Mike’s income tax basis in the land equals its fair market value.
43. [LO2] Illini Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 from operations for this
year. During the year, the company made a distribution of an automobile to its sole
shareholder, Carly Urbana. The auto’s fair market value was $30,000 and its tax basis to
Illini was $0. The auto’s E&P basis was $15,000. Any gain from the distribution will be
taxed at 21 percent. Illini had accumulated E&P of $1,500,000.
a. Compute Illini’s total taxable income and federal income tax.
Gain on distribution of auto ($30,000 - $0) 30,000
Federal income tax ($530,000 x 21%) 111,300
b. Compute Illini’s current E&P.

Subtract:
Adjustment for E&P gain on distribution of auto* ( 15,000)
* $30,000 tax gain – $15,000 E&P gain ($30,000 - $15,000)
c. Compute Illini’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

Subtract:
Fair market value of auto distributed this year ( 30,000)
Current E&P after distribution $373,700
Accumulated E&P, beginning of this year 1,500,000
d. What amount of dividend income does Carly report as a result of the distribution?
Carly reports dividend income of $30,000, computed as the fair market value of the
auto received ($30,000). Illini has sufficient current earnings and profits to support
dividend treatment.
e. What is Carly’s tax basis in the auto she received from Illini?
$30,000. Carly’s income tax basis in the auto equals its fair market value.
44. [LO2] Beaver Corporation reported taxable income of $500,000 from operations this year.
During the year, the company made a distribution of land to its sole shareholder, Eugenia
VanDam. The land’s fair market value was $20,000 and its tax and E&P basis to Beaver
was $50,000. Eugenia assumed a mortgage on the land of $25,000. Any gain from the
distribution will be taxed at 21 percent. Beaver had accumulated E&P of $1,500,000.
a. Compute Beaver’s total taxable income and federal income tax.
Loss on distribution of land ($25,000 - $50,000)* 0
* Loss on a distribution of property is not recognized. Because the mortgage

assumed exceeds the property’s fair market value, the land’s fair market value for
purposes of computing gain would equal the mortgage assumed.
b. Compute Beaver’s current E&P.

Less: Federal income tax (105,000)
Less: Adjustment for E&P loss on distribution of land ( 0)
c. Compute Beaver’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

Subtract: E&P basis of land distributed (50,000)
Add: Mortgage assumed by Eugenia 25,000
Current E&P after distribution $ 370,000
d. What amount of dividend income does Eugenia report as a result of the distribution?
Eugenia reports dividend income of $0, computed as the fair market value of the
land received ($20,000) less the liability she assumes ($25,000).
45. [LO2] {research form} Tiny and Tim each own half of the 100 outstanding shares of
Flower Corporation. This year Flower reported taxable income of $6,000. In addition,
Flower received $20,000 of life insurance proceeds due to the death of an employee
(Flower paid $500 in life insurance premiums this year). Flower had $5,000 of
accumulated E&P at the beginning of the year.
a. What is Flower’s current E&P?
Taxable income $ 6,000
Less: Tax at 21% - 1,260
Plus: tax exempt income + 20,000
Less: expenses associated with exempt income - 500
Current E&P $ 24,240
b. Flower distributed $6,000 on February 15 and $30,000 on August 1. What total
amount of dividends will Tiny and Tim report?
The current E&P is allocated based on the amount of the distribution ($6,000 is 1/6
of the total distribution) whereas the accumulated E&P is allocated chronologically
up to the amount of the distribution. The calculation is as follows:
Amount Distributed $6,000 $ 30,000

proportion of total distribution 1/6 5/6
Current E&P ($24,240 divided 1/6, 5/6) $ 4,040 $ 20,200
Accumulated E&P (chronological) 1,960 3,040
Total dividend $ 6,000 $ 23,240
c. What amount of capital gain (if any) would Tiny and Tim report on the distributions
in part b if their stock basis is $2,000 and $10,000, respectively?
The $6,000 distribution in February would have no impact on stock basis since this
entire amount is treated as a dividend. Only $23,240 of the August distribution was
dividend income and so the remaining $6,760 would be treated as a return of
capital. Thus, $11,620 of the $15,000 received by each shareholder in August would
be treated as dividend and the remaining $3,380 would be a return of capital. The
$3,380 return of capital would reduce the basis of Tiny’s stock to zero and generate
a $1,380 capital gain ($3,380 - $2,000). The $3,380 return of capital would only
reduce Tim’s basis to $6,620 ($10,000 less $3,380).
d. What form would Flower use to report non-dividend distributions?
Form 5452 is used to report non-dividend distributions.
e. On what form (line) would Tiny and Tim report these distributions?
Dividend distributions are reported on line 5 of Part II of Schedule B (or line 9 of
form 1040) while non-dividend distributions in excess of basis are reported initially
on Form 8949. The totals from Form 8949 are then transferred to either Part I or
Part II (depending on holding period) of Schedule D.
46. [LO3] Hoosier Corporation declared a 2-for-1 stock split to all shareholders of record on
March 25 of this year. Hoosier reported current E&P of $600,000 and accumulated E&P of
$3,000,000. The total fair market value of the stock distributed was $1,500,000. Barbara
Bloomington owned 1,000 shares of Hoosier stock with a tax basis of $100 per share.
a. What amount of taxable dividend income, if any, does Barbara recognize this year?
Assume the fair market value of the stock was $150 per share on March 25 of this
year.
The stock dividend is not taxable because it is pro rata to all the shareholders.
b. What is Barbara’s income tax basis in the new and existing stock she owns in
Hoosier Corporation, assuming the distribution is tax-free?
The new stock is allocated part of the tax basis of the old stock based on relative fair
market value. In a 2 for 1 stock split, Barbara would allocate half of the basis of the
old stock ($100) to the new stock, making her tax basis in the old and new stock $50
per share.
c. How does the stock distribution affect Hoosier’s accumulated E&P at the beginning
of next year?
Hoosier does not adjust its E&P for the stock dividend because it is not taxable to
the shareholders.
47. [LO3] Badger Corporation declared a stock distribution to all shareholders of record on
March 25 of this year. Shareholders will receive one share of Badger stock for each ten
shares of stock they already own. Madison Cheesehead owns 1,000 shares of Badger stock
with a tax basis of $100 per share. The fair market value of the Badger stock was $110 per
share on March 25 of this year.
a. What amount of taxable dividend income, if any, does Madison recognize this year?
The stock dividend is not taxable because it is pro rata to all the shareholders.
b. What is Madison’s income tax basis in her new and existing stock in Badger
Corporation, assuming the distribution is non-taxable?
The new stock is allocated part of the tax basis of the old stock based on relative fair
market value. After the stock dividend, Madison will own 1,100 shares of Badger
stock (1,000 + 1,000/10), each with the same fair market value. Her basis in each
share of stock will be $91 (rounded), computed as (1,000 shares x $100 basis) /
1,100.
c. How would you answer parts (a) and (b) if Badger offered shareholders a choice
between one additional share of Badger stock for each 10 shares held or receiving
$120 cash in lieu of an additional share of stock?
Regardless of whether Madison choose the stock or the cash, she would have a
taxable dividend equal to $12,000 (computed as 1,000/10 x $120) because the
distribution has the potential to be non pro rata to the shareholders. If Madison
chose the additional shares of Badger stock, the tax basis of the new shares would be
the amount of dividend income, $12,000 ($120 per share).
48. [LO4] Wildcat Company is owned equally by Evan Stone and his sister Sara, each of
whom hold 1,000 shares in the company. Sara wants to reduce her ownership in the
company, and it was decided that the company will redeem 500 of her shares for $25,000
per share on December 31 of this year. Sara’s income tax basis in each share is $5,000.
Wildcat has current E&P of $10,000,000 and accumulated E&P of $50,000,000.
a. What is the amount and character (capital gain or dividend) recognized by Sara as a
result of the stock redemption?
Sara reduces her ownership in Wildcat Company from 50% to 33.33% (500/1,500).
Sara meets the substantially disproportionate test to treat the redemption as an
exchange. Under this test, she reduces her ownership below 50%, and her
ownership percentage after the redemption is less than 80% of her ownership before
the redemption (80% x 50% = 40%). As a result, Sara recognizes a capital gain of
$20,000 per share ($25,000 - $5,000).
b. What is Sara’s income tax basis in the remaining 500 shares she owns in the
company?
Sara’s income tax basis in the remaining shares remains $5,000 per share or
$2,500,000 income tax basis in remaining 500 shares.
c. Assuming the company did not make any dividend distributions during this year, by
what amount does Wildcat reduce its E&P as a result of the redemption?
$12,500,000. Wildcat reduces its accumulated E&P by the lesser of the cash
distributed ($12,500,000 {500 * $25,000}) or the percentage of stock redeemed times
accumulated E&P after reduction by any dividends paid during the year (500/2,000
x $60,000,000 = $15,000,000).
49. [LO4] Flintstone Company is owned equally by Fred Stone and his sister Wilma, each of
whom hold 1,000 shares in the company. Wilma wants to reduce her ownership in the
company, and it was decided that the company will redeem 250 of her shares for $25,000
per share on December 31 of this year. Wilma’s income tax basis in each share is $5,000.
Flintstone has current E&P of $10,000,000 and accumulated E&P of $50,000,000.
a. What is the amount and character (capital gain or dividend) recognized by Wilma as
a result of the stock redemption, assuming only the “substantially disproportionate
with respect to the shareholder” test is applied?
Wilma reduces her ownership in Flintstone Company from 50% to 42.9%

(750/1,750). Wilma fails the “substantially disproportionate” test to treat the
redemption as an exchange. Although she reduces her ownership below 50%, her
ownership percentage after the redemption is not less than 80% of her ownership
before the redemption (80% x 50% = 40%). As a result, Wilma recognizes a
dividend of $6,250,000 ($25,000 x 250 shares).
b. Given your answer to question a, what is Wilma’s income tax basis in the remaining
750 shares she owns in the company?
Wilma’s income tax basis in the remaining shares of stock is $5,000,000. Wilma
adds back the “unused” tax basis of the 250 shares redeemed ($1,250,000) to the
basis of her remaining 750 shares ($3,750,000).
c. Assuming the company did not make any dividend distributions this year, by what
amount does Flintstone reduce its E&P as a result of the redemption?
Flintstone reduces its E&P by $6,250,000, the amount of dividend income reported
by Wilma.
d. What other argument might Wilma make to treat the redemption as an exchange?
Wilma could argue that the distribution is not “essentially equivalent to a dividend”
(section 301(b)(1)) because she reduced her ownership below 50 percent. This is a
subjective test that the taxpayer can assert with proper facts although the IRS may
dispute such a characterization upon audit.
50. [LO4] Acme Corporation has 1,000 shares outstanding. Joan and Bill are married, and they
each own 20 shares of Acme. Joan’s daughter, Shirley also owns 20 shares of Acme. Joan
is an equal partner with Jeri in the J&J partnership, and this partnership owns 60 shares of
Acme. Jeri is not related to Joan or Bill. How many shares of Acme is Shirley deemed to
own under the stock attribution rules?
Shirley is deemed to own 90 shares of Acme. She owns 20 shares directly and is attributed
20 shares from Bill (family attribution). She is also attributed 50 shares from Joan (family
attribution). Joan owns 20 shares directly and another 30 shares is attributed to Joan
from J&J (50% of 60 shares through entity attribution). The 30 shares attributed to Joan
are reattributed to Shirley through family attribution.
51. [LO4] Bedrock, Inc. is owned equally by Barney Rubble and his wife Betty, each of whom
hold 1,000 shares in the company. Betty wants to reduce her ownership in the company,
and it was decided that the company will redeem 500 of her shares for $25,000 per share
on December 31 of this year. Betty’s income tax basis in each share is $5,000. Bedrock
has current E&P of $10,000,000 and accumulated E&P of $50,000,000.
a. What is the amount and character (capital gain or dividend) recognized by Betty as a
result of the stock redemption, assuming only the “substantially disproportionate
with respect to the shareholder” test is applied?
Betty reduces her direct ownership in Bedrock, Inc. from 50% to 33.3% (500/1,500).
However, under the family attribution rules, she is deemed to own the 1,000 shares
owned by her husband, Barney. Her stock ownership before the exchange is 100%,
and her ownership after the exchange is still 100% (1,500/1,500). Betty fails the
substantially disproportionate test to treat the redemption as an exchange. As a
result, Betty recognizes a dividend of $12,500,000 ($25,000 x 500 shares).
b. Given your answer to part a, what is Betty’s income tax basis in the remaining 500
shares she owns in the company?
Betty’s income tax basis in her remaining shares is $5,000,000. Betty adds back the
“unused” tax basis of the 500 shares redeemed ($2,500,000) to the basis of her
remaining 500 shares ($2,500,000).
c. Assuming the company did not make any dividend distributions this year, by what
amount does Bedrock reduce its E&P as a result of the redemption?
Bedrock reduces its accumulated E&P by the cash distributed ($12,500,000).
d. Can Betty argue that the redemption is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” and
should be treated as an exchange?
No. The attribution rules apply to this test as well as the other stock ownership tests.
As a result, Betty is treated as owning 100% of the Bedrock stock before and after
the reduction.
52. [LO4] {research} Assume in problem 51 that Betty and Barney are not getting along and
have separated due to marital discord (although they are not legally separated). In fact,
they cannot even stand to talk to each other anymore and communicate only through their
accountant. Betty wants to argue that she should not be treated as owning any of Barney’s
stock in Bedrock because of their hostility towards each other. Can family hostility be
used as an argument to void the family attribution rules? Consult Rev. Rul. 80-26, 1980-1
C.B. 66, Robin Haft Trust v. Comm., 510 F.2d 43 (CA-1 1975), Metzger Trust v. Comm.,
693 F.2d 459 (CA-5 1982, and Cerone v. Comm., 87 TC 1 (1986).
Probably not. The IRS held that family hostility cannot be used to ignore the family
attribution rules in Rev. Rul. 80-26, 1980-1 C.B. 66. In Robin Haft Trust v. Comm., 510
F.2d 43 (CA-1 1975), the 1st Circuit reversed the Tax Court (62 T.C. 145 (1974)) and held
that family hostility might “negate the presumption” of the family attribution rules. The
5th Circuit (Metzger Trust v. Comm., 693 F.2d 459 (CA-5 1982)) and the Tax Court
(Cerone v. Comm., 87 TC 1 (1986)) have held that family hostility should not affect the
application of the attribution rules. In Metzger, the 5th Circuit explained its decision as
follows:
The courts of appeal have been given the authority to review Tax Court decisions at
least in part because it was thought that a generalist’s perspective would be helpful;
that we are less likely to succumb to the arcane. Yet the avoidance of the arcane must
include recognition of the limits of tax law. It is not a task measured by the
chancellor’s foot. As understandable as it may be, yielding to the temptation to “do
equity” in a specific tax case by looking past plain language to judicially perceived
purpose will not do. We do not.
The Tax Court noted in Cerone that family hostility might have a limited role in testing for
dividend equivalence under §302(b)(1).
53. [LO4] Boots, Inc. is owned equally by Frank Albert and his daughter Nancy, each of
whom hold 1,000 shares in the company. Frank wants to retire from the company, and it
was decided that the company will redeem all 1,000 of his shares for $25,000 per share on
December 31 of this year. Frank’s income tax basis in each share is $500. Boots, Inc. has
current E&P of $1,000,000 and accumulated E&P of $5,000,000.
a. What must Frank do to ensure that the redemption will be treated as an exchange?
Frank must file a “triple i agreement” with the IRS, in which he agrees he will not
acquire a prohibited interest in the next 10 years. By filing such an agreement,
Frank can waive the family attribution rules and be treated as having a complete
termination of his interest in Boots, Inc.
b. If Frank remained as the Chairman of the Board after the redemption, what is the
amount and character (capital gain or dividend) of income that Frank will recognize
this year?
In this case even if Frank filed a “triple i agreement” with the IRS, he would have
retained a prohibited interest in the company, and this interest will cause the family
attribution rules to apply to the distribution. Frank will be deemed to own 100% of
the company before and after the distribution. As a result, the distribution will be
treated as a property distribution under section 301. Frank’s distribution totals
$25,000,000 ($25,000 x 1,000 shares). The distribution will be a dividend to the
extent of the company’s E&P of $6,000,000. The remaining $19,000,000 will be a
tax-free return of capital to the extent of Frank’s basis in his shares of stock
($500,000) and a capital gain for the remaining amount ($18,500,000).
c. If Frank treats the redemption as a dividend, what happens to his stock basis in the
1,000 shares redeemed?
Frank will have a basis of $0 in his stock after the transaction. His unused basis
otherwise would transfer to Nancy, the person who attributed stock to him that
caused him to fail the exchange test.
54. [LO4] {research} In problem 53, Nancy would like to have Frank stay on as a consultant
after all of his shares are redeemed. She would pay him a modest amount of $500 per
month. Nancy wants to know if there is any de minimis rule such that Frank would not be
treated as having retained a prohibited interest in the company because he is receiving such
a small amount of money. Consult Lynch v. Comm., 801 F.2d 1176 (CA-9 1986),
reversing 83 T.C. 597 (1984), Seda, 82 T.C. 484 (1984), and Cerone, 87 T.C. 1 (1986).
The courts generally have held that there is no de minimis rule in determining if a
shareholder has acquired a prohibited interest in a corporation for purposes of waiving
the family attribution rules in a complete termination of the shareholder’s stock interest in
a corporation. In Lynch, 83 T.C. 597 (1984), the Tax Court held that a salary of $500 per
month was not substantial enough to treat the family member as having a prohibited
interest. The 9th Circuit reversed the Tax Court’s decision in Lynch, 801 F.2d 1176 (CA-9
1986), and held that the Tax Court had no authority to read into the legislative history of
§302(c) a de minimis rule. In Seda, 82 T.C. 484 (1984), the Tax Court held that a monthly
salary of $1,000 was substantial enough to treat the family member as having a prohibited
interest. In Cerone, 87 T.C. 1 (1986), the Tax Court ruled that a salary of $14,400 per
year was substantial enough to treat the family member as having a prohibited interest (it
was in excess of the $12,000 received by the taxpayer in Seda).
55. [LO4] {planning} Limited Brands recently repurchased 68,965,000 of its shares, paying
$29 per share. The total number of shares outstanding before the redemption was
473,223,066. The total number of shares outstanding after the redemption was
404,258,066. Assume your client owned 20,000 shares of stock in The Limited. What is
the minimum number of shares she must tender to receive exchange treatment under the
“substantially disproportionate with respect to the shareholder” change-in-ownership rules?
Before the redemption, your client owned 0.0042263% of the stock (20,000 /
473,223,066). To meet the “substantially disproportionate with respect to the
shareholder” change-in-ownership rules, your client must reduce her stock ownership
below .0033811% (80%). The algebraic equation to solve for the number of shares to be
redeemed is (20,000 – X) / 404,258,066 < .000033811. Solving for X, the number of
shares to have redeemed equals 6,332 shares. After the redemption, your client will own
13,668 shares. Her percentage ownership will now be .0033810%, which is below the
80% threshold. With an ownership percentage this small, it is likely that any redemption
that reduces the shareholder’s percentage stock ownership will be treated as an
exchange under the “not essentially equal to a dividend” test.
56. [LO4] Cougar Company is owned equally by Cat Stevens and a partnership that is owned
equally by his father and two unrelated individuals. Cat and the partnership each own
3,000 shares in the company. Cat wants to reduce his ownership in the company, and it is
decided that the company will redeem 1,500 of his shares for $25,000 per share. Cat’s
income tax basis in each share is $5,000. What are the income tax consequences to Cat as
a result of the stock redemption, assuming the company has earnings and profits of $10
million?
Cat owns directly 3,000 shares in Cougar Company and owns 1,000 shares indirectly
through his father’s ownership in the partnership (1/3 x 3,000). Prior to the redemption,
Cat owns 4,000 / 6,000 shares = 66.67%. After the redemption of 1,500 shares, Cat owns
2,500 / 4,500 shares = 55.55%. Because Cat’s stock ownership remains above 50%, he
will be treated as having received a dividend to the extent of the corporation’s E&P
($10,000,000). Of the remaining distribution of $27,500,000, $15,000,000 will be treated
as a tax-free return of capital (1,500 x $10,000 – the basis in the redeemed stock is
allocated to the remaining shares) and $12,500,000 will be treated as gain from sale of
stock (capital gain).
57. [LO4] {planning} Oriole Corporation, a privately-held company, has one class of voting
common stock, of which 1,000 shares are issued and outstanding. The shares are owned as
follows:
Larry Byrd 400
Paul Byrd (Larry’s son) 200
Lady Byrd (Larry’s daughter) 200
Cal Rifkin (unrelated) 200
Total 1,000
Larry is considering retirement and would like to have the corporation redeem all of his
shares for $400,000.
a. What must Larry do or consider if he wants to guarantee that the redemption will be
treated as an exchange?
Because this is a complete termination of his direct ownership interest in Oriole
Corporation, Larry can elect to waive the family attribution rules provided he does
not acquire a prohibited interest in Oriole over the next ten years. Larry must file a
“triple i agreement” with the IRS to waive the election and agree to alert the IRS if
he acquires a prohibited interest within the next 10 years.
b. Could Larry still act as a consultant to the company and still have the redemption
treated as an exchange?
No. A consultant is considered a prohibited interest in Oriole Corporation.
58. [LO4] {research} Using the facts from problem 57, Oriole Corporation proposes to pay
Larry $100,000 and give him an installment note that will pay him $30,000 per year for the
next 10 years plus a market rate of interest. Will this arrangement allow Larry to treat the
redemption as an exchange? Consult §453(k)(2)(A).
Yes. IRC §453(k)(2)(A) allows a corporation to issue an installment note to a shareholder
in a redemption if the corporation is privately-held. The installment note would not be
considered a prohibited interest (being a creditor of the company is allowed).
59. [LO4] EG Corporation redeemed 200 shares of stock from one of its shareholders in
exchange for $200,000. The redemption represented 20% of the corporation’s outstanding
stock. The redemption was treated as an exchange by the shareholder. By what amount
does EG reduce its total E&P as a result of the redemption under the following E&P
assumptions?
a. EG’s total E&P at the time of the distribution was $2,000,000.
In a redemption treated as an exchange, EG reduces its E&P by the lesser of the
amount distributed ($200,000) or the percentage of stock redeemed times E&P at the
time of the distribution (20% x $2,000,000 = $400,000). In this case, EG reduces its
E&P by $200,000.
b. EG’s total E&P at the time of the distribution was $500,000.
In a redemption treated as an exchange, EG reduces its E&P by the lesser of the
amount distributed ($200,000) or the percentage of stock redeemed times E&P at the
time of the distribution (20% x $500,000 = $100,000). In this case, EG reduces its
E&P by $100,000.
60. [LO4] {research} Spartan Corporation redeemed 25% of its shares for $2,000 on July 1 of
this year, in a transaction that qualified as an exchange under §302(a). Spartan’s
accumulated E&P at the beginning of the year was $2,000. Its current E&P is $12,000.
Spartan made dividend distributions of $1,000 on June 1 and $4,000 on August 31.
Determine the beginning balance in Spartan’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of the
next year. See Rev. Rul. 74-338, 1974-2 C.B. 101 and Rev. Rul. 74-339, 1974-2 C.B. 103
for help in making this calculation.
Spartan first reduces its current E&P for dividend distributions made during the year.
Current E&P is $7,000 ($12,000 - $1,000 - $4,000) for purposes of computing the effect of
the redemption on accumulated E&P. Accumulated E&P on July 1 is $5,500 ($2,000 +
($7,000 x 6/12)). Spartan reduces accumulated E&P as a result of the redemption by the
lesser of the distribution ($2,000) or (25% x $5,500 = $1,375). Accumulated E&P at
January 1 is $7,625 ($2,000 + $12,000 - $1,000 - $4,000 - $1,375).
61. [LO4] Bonnie and Clyde are the only two shareholders in Getaway Corporation. Bonnie
owns 60 shares with a basis of $3,000, and Clyde owns the remaining 40 shares with a
basis of $12,000. At year end, Getaway is considering different alternatives for redeeming
some shares of stock. Evaluate whether each of these stock redemption transactions
qualify for sale or exchange treatment.
a. Getaway redeems 10 of Bonnie’s shares for $2,000. Getaway has $20,000 of E&P at
year end and Bonnie is unrelated to Clyde.
Bonnie owns 60% before the redemption and 56% after the redemption (50/90).
Thus, the redemption will fail the 50% test in § 302(b)(2). Because Bonnie still has
control of the corporation after the redemption (more than 50%) the redemption will
likely fail the not essentially equivalent to a dividend test under §302(b)(1).
b. Getaway redeems 25 of Bonnie’s shares for $4,000. Getaway has $20,000 of E&P at
year end and Bonnie is unrelated to Clyde.
Bonnie owns 60% before the redemption and 47% after the redemption (35/75). In
addition, Bonnie’s share of the outstanding stock after the redemption has dropped
by more than 80% (80% x 60%= 48%) of her percentage ownership before the
redemption (60% before and 47% afterwards). Thus, the redemption passes both the
50% test and the 80% test in § 302(b)(2). This means that Bonnie will treat her
redeemed shares as though she sold them for $4,000 resulting in a capital gain of
$2,750 ($4,000 – [(25/60) × $3,000).
c. Getaway redeems 10 of Clyde’s shares for $2,500. Getaway has $20,000 of E&P at
year end and Clyde is unrelated to Bonnie.
Clyde owns 40% before the redemption and 33% after the redemption (30/90).
However, Clyde’s share of the outstanding stock has not dropped by more than 80%
(80% x 40%= 32%) since his ownership percentage would have to be below 32%,
and his ownership percentage is 33%. Thus, the redemption passes the 50% test but
fails the 80% test in § 302(b)(2). This redemption might still qualify as a redemption
not essentially equivalent to a dividend under § 302(b)(1). Clyde does not have
control of the corporation (Bonnie does), and he has suffered a significant reduction
in his ownership.
62. [LO5] Aggie Corporation made a distribution of $500,000 to Rusty Cedar in partial
liquidation of the company on December 31 of this year. Rusty, an individual, owns 100%
of Aggie Corporation. The distribution was in exchange for 50% of Rusty’s stock in the
company. At the time of the distribution, the shares had a fair market value of $200 per
share. Rusty’s income tax basis in the shares was $50 per share. Aggie had total E&P of
$8,000,000 at the time of the distribution.
a. What is the amount and character (capital gain or dividend) of any income or gain
recognized per share by Rusty as a result of the partial liquidation?
An individual receives exchange treatment on distributions in partial liquidation of
stock. As a result, Rusty reports capital gain of $150 per share of stock exchanged
($200 - $50).
b. Assuming Aggie made no other distributions to Rusty during the year, by what
amount does Aggie reduce its total E&P as a result of the partial liquidation?
Because the liquidation is treated as an exchange, Aggie reduces its E&P by the
lesser of the amount distributed ($500,000) or the pro-rata amount of the E&P
attributable to the redeemed percentage amount (50% x $8,000,000 = $4,000,000).

In this case, Aggie reduces its E&P by $500,000.
63. [LO5] Wolverine Corporation made a distribution of $500,000 to Jim Har, Inc. in partial
liquidation of the company on December 31 of this year. Jim Har, Inc. owns 100% of
Wolverine Corporation. The distribution was in exchange for 50% of Jim Har, Inc.’s stock
in the company. At the time of the distribution, the shares had a fair market value of $200
per share. Jim Har, Inc.’s income tax basis in the shares was $50 per share. Wolverine had
total E&P of $8,000,000 at the time of the distribution.
a. What is the total amount and character (capital gain or dividend) of any income or
gain recognized by Jim Har, Inc. as a result of the partial liquidation?
A corporation receives dividend treatment on distributions in partial liquidation of
stock. As a result, Jim Har, Inc. reports a dividend of $500,000, which is eligible for
a 100% dividends received deduction.
b. Assuming Wolverine made no other distributions to Jim Har, Inc. during the year, by
what amount does Wolverine reduce its total E&P as a result of the partial
liquidation?
$500,000, the amount treated by Jim Har, Inc. as a dividend.
Comprehensive problems
64. Lanco Corporation, an accrual-method corporation, reported taxable income of $1,460,000

this year.
Included in the computation of taxable income were the following items:
• MACRS depreciation of $200,000. Straight line depreciation would have been $120,000.
• A net capital loss carryover of $10,000 from last year
• A net operating loss carryover of $25,000 from last year
• $65,000 capital gain from the distribution of land to the company’s sole shareholder (see
below)
Not included in the computation of taxable income were the following items:
• Tax-exempt income of $5,000

• Life insurance proceeds of $250,000
• Excess current year charitable contribution of $2,500 (to be carried over to next year)
• Tax-deferred gain of $20,000 on a like-kind exchange
• Federal income tax refund from last year of $35,000
• Non-deductible life insurance premium of $3,500
• Non-deductible interest expense of $1,000 on a loan used to buy tax-exempt bonds
Lanco’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of the year was $2,400,000.

During the year, Lanco made the following distributions to its sole shareholder, Luigi
(Lug) Nutt:
• June 30: $50,000
• September 30: Parcel of land with a fair market value of $75,000. Lanco’s tax basis in
the land was $10,000. Lug assumed an existing mortgage on the property of $15,000.
a. Compute Lanco’s current E&P.

Add:
Excess of MACRS depreciation over straight-line 80,000
NCL carryover 10,000
NOL carryover 25,000
Tax-exempt income 5,000
Life insurance proceeds 250,000
Subtract:
Federal income taxes accrued (at 21%) (306,600)
Excess charitable contribution ( 2,500)
Non-deductible life insurance premium ( 3,500)
Non-deductible interest expense ( 1,000)
Current E&P $1,516,400
The federal income tax refund is not added back because Lanco is an accrual basis
taxpayer. No adjustment is made for the capital gain recognized on the distribution to
Lug because the land has the same basis for income tax and E&P purposes.
b. Compute the amount of dividend income reported by Lug Nutt this year as a result of
the distributions.
Lug reports dividend income of $110,000, which includes the cash distribution of
$50,000 and $60,000 from the land distribution ($75,000 - $15,000 mortgage
assumed).
c. Compute Lanco’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.
Current E&P $1,516,400
Subtract:
Cash dividend (50,000)
Fair market value of land distributed (75,000)
Add:
Mortgage assumed by Lug 15,000
Current E&P after distribution $1,406,400
65. Petoskey Stone Quarry, Inc. (PSQ), a calendar year, accrual basis C Corporation, provides
landscaping supplies to local builders in northern Michigan. PSQ has always been a
family owned business and has a single class of voting common stock outstanding. The
500 outstanding shares are owned as follows:
Number of shares
Nick Adams 150
Amy Adams (Nick’s sister) 150
Abigail Adams (Nick’s daughter) 50
Charlie Adams (Nick’s son) 50
Sandler Adams (Nick’s father) 100
Total shares 500
Nick Adams serves as President of PSQ, and his father Sandler serves as chairman of the
Board. Amy is the company’s CFO, and Abigail and Charlie work as employees of the
company. Sandler would like to retire and sell his shares back to the company. The fair
market value of the shares is $500,000. Sandler’s tax basis is $10,000.
The redemption is tentatively scheduled to take place on December 31 of this year. At the
beginning of the year PSQ had accumulated earnings and profits of $2,500,000. The
company projects current E&P of $200,000. The company intends to pay pro rata cash
dividends of $300 per share to its shareholders on December 1 of this year.
a. Assume the redemption takes place as planned on December 31 and no elections are
made by the shareholders.
1. What amount of dividend or capital gain will Sandler recognize as a result of the
stock redemption?
Sandler will have a dividend of $500,000. Under the family attribution rules, Sandler is
deemed to own the shares of stock of his son Nick (150) and his grandchildren Abigail
(50) and Charlie (50). He is not deemed to own any of Amy’s stock. Prior to the
redemption, Sandler owns 350 / 500 shares = 70%. After the redemption, assuming he
does not waive the family attribution rules, Sandler is deemed to own 250 / 400 =
62.5% of the company’s stock. The company has ample E&P to absorb the distribution
to Sandler on December 31 and the distribution of $150,000 (500 x $300) on December
1.
2. How will the tax basis of Sandler's stock be allocated to the remaining shareholders?
Sandler’s unused tax basis in his stock of $10,000 will be allocated to Nick, Abigail,
and Charlie on a pro rata basis because they caused him to fail the exchange test.
b. What must Sandler and the other shareholders do to change the tax results you
calculated in part a?
Sandler must file a “triple i agreement” with the IRS to waive the family attribution
rules. He will then have a capital gain of $490,000 ($500,000 - $10,000) because he
will be treated as having a complete termination of his interest in PSQ.
c. Compute PSQ’s accumulated earnings and profits on January 1 of next year

assuming the redemption is treated as an exchange.
Subtract:
Cash dividends on December 1 (150,000)
Current E&P on December 31 after dividends 50,000
Accumulated E&P at December 31 $2,550,000
Subtract:
Lesser of cash distributed = $500,000 ( 500,000)
or 20% x $2,550,000 = $510,000
Accumulated E&P at January 1 of next year $2,050,000
66. Thriller Corporation has one class of voting common stock, of which 1,000 shares are issued
and outstanding. The shares are owned as follows:
Joe Jackson 400
Mike Jackson (Joe’s son) 200
Jane Jackson (Joe’s daughter) 200
Vinnie Price (unrelated) 200
Total 1,000
Thriller Corporation has current E&P of $300,000 for this year and accumulated E&P at
January 1 of this year of $500,000.
During this year, the corporation made the following distributions to its shareholders:
03/31: Distributed $10/share to each shareholder ($10,000 in total).
06/30: Redeemed 200 shares of Joe’s stock for $200,000. Joe’s basis in the 200
shares redeemed was $100,000.
09/30: Redeemed 60 shares of Vinnie’s stock for $60,000. His basis in the 60
shares was $36,000.
12/31: Distributed $10/share to each shareholder ($7,400 in total).
a. Determine the tax status of each distribution made this year. (Hint: First, consider if
the redemptions are treated as dividend distributions or exchanges.)
The $10,000 distribution on March 31 is a dividend because Current E&P of $300,000
exceeds total dividends distributed during the year. The $7,400 distribution on
December 31 is a dividend because Current E&P of $300,000 exceeds total dividends
distributed during the year.
Joe is deemed to own 800 of the 1,000 (80%) shares of Thriller Corporation (400
directly and 200 each from Mike and Jane) before the redemption. After the
redemption Joe is deemed to own 600 of the 800 (75%) remaining shares of Thriller
Corporation (200 directly and 200 each from Mike and Jane). Joe fails the stock
ownership tests because he still owns more than 50% of the stock. Therefore, the entire
$200,000 received by Joe is treated as a dividend.
Vinnie owns 200 of the remaining 800 (25%) shares of Thriller Corporation stock
before the redemption. After the redemption, Vinnie owns 140 of the 740 (18.9%)
remaining shares of Thriller Corporation stock. Vinnie meets both the 50% and 80%
tests of §302(b)(2) (18.9% is less than 50% and is less than {80%  25%} = 20%).
Vinnie treats the redemption as an exchange and reports a capital gain of $24,000
($60,000 - $36,000).
b. Compute the corporation’s accumulated E&P at January 1 of next year.
Thriller Corporation first reduces its Current E&P for the dividends paid during the
current year:
- Dividends paid (217,400)
Undistributed Current E&P $ 82,600
x 9/12 0.75
Undistributed Current E&P at 9/30 $61,950
Current E&P in 4th quarter + 20,650
Accumulated E&P at 1/01 + 500,000
Total Accumulated E&P at 9/30 $582,600
Reduce Accumulated E&P by the lesser of:
$60,000, or
60/800 x $582,600 = $43,695 ( 43,695)
Accumulated E&P at 01/01 of next year $538,905
c. Joe is considering retirement and would like to have the corporation redeem all of his
shares for $100,000 plus a 10-year note with a fair market value of $300,000.
1. What must Joe do or consider if he wants to ensure that the redemption will be
treated as an exchange.
Joe must execute a family attribution waiver and a “triple i agreement” with the IRS in
which he agrees not to acquire a “prohibited interest” within the next 10 years. If he
does acquire such an interest, he must so inform the IRS or the statute of limitations on
the tax return that reports the redemption will begin to run. A creditor is not a
prohibited interest.
2. Could Joe still act as a consultant to the company?
The IRS and courts have held that serving as a consultant is considered to be a
prohibited interest. The Tax Court adopted a de minimis rule with respect to how much
the former shareholder is paid ($500/mo. was okay but not $1,000/mo.). The 9th
Circuit overruled the Tax Court in Lynch and held that no de minimis rule should be
applied.
d. Thriller Corporation must pay attorney’s fees of $5,000 to facilitate the stock
redemptions. Is this fee deductible?
Generally, §162(k) disallows a deduction for expenses incurred “in connection with” a
stock redemption. However, Congress enacted §162(k)(2)(A)(i) in 1996 to allow
deductions for expenses related to indebtedness incurred to repurchase stock. If the
payment was to facilitate a debt offering to repurchase the stock, the expense would be
deductible.

Taxation of Business Entities 2019 Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Taxation of Business Entities 2019 Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Taxation of Business Entities 2019 Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Taxation of Business Entities 2019

Edition 10th Edition Spilker Solutions

1. [LO1] What is meant by the term double taxation of corporate income?

Corporate tax: $400,000  21% $ 84,000

Boomer reports a dividend of $50,000. He first computes balance in E&P as of June

Taxable income $36,000

Taxable income $1,000,000

b. Compute Volunteer’s current E&P.

c. Compute Volunteer’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

b. Compute Tiger’s current E&P.

c. Compute Tiger’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

b. Compute Illini’s current E&P.

* $30,000 tax gain – $15,000 E&P gain ($30,000 - $15,000)

c. Compute Illini’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

* Loss on a distribution of property is not recognized. Because the mortgage

b. Compute Beaver’s current E&P.

c. Compute Beaver’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of next year.

Amount Distributed $6,000 $ 30,000

Wilma reduces her ownership in Flintstone Company from 50% to 42.9%

attributable to the redeemed percentage amount (50% x $8,000,000 = $4,000,000).

64. Lanco Corporation, an accrual-method corporation, reported taxable income of $1,460,000

• Tax-exempt income of $5,000

Lanco’s accumulated E&P at the beginning of the year was $2,400,000.

a. Compute Lanco’s current E&P.

500 outstanding shares are owned as follows:

c. Compute PSQ’s accumulated earnings and profits on January 1 of next year

12/31: Distributed $10/share to each shareholder ($7,400 in total).

You might also like