Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pharmacogenetic The Future of Cancer Treatment - DR - Andika SP - pd-kHOM
Pharmacogenetic The Future of Cancer Treatment - DR - Andika SP - pd-kHOM
Pharmacogenetic The Future of Cancer Treatment - DR - Andika SP - pd-kHOM
“Dealing with cancer is not just dealing with the cancer. It’s treating the whole person.”
Background
Helping clinicians:
Improved understanding of
• making correct diagnosis
molecular mechanism and
• predicting outcomes
cellular interaction
• optimally selecting patients
for therapies
New insights about disease-
Personalized and precision
initiating exogenous factors
medicine – rapidly growing
and endogenous elicitors of
new disciplines
disease development
Facilitating the development of:
- Therapeutic approaches
Better understanding of drug
- New drugs
actions and interactions that
- New prognostic scoring
underlie efficacy and adverse
models
events
Precision Medicine: In Drug Development
Critical Question for the Next Ten Years:
How to Use the Genome to Improve Human Health?
Sequencing Cost per Genome,
$100,000,000 2001-2020
$10,000,000 Current Progress
$1,000,000
$100,000
$10,000
$1000 Average Progress
$100
$10
$1 Rapid Progress
$.10
$.01
$0
Evidence-based medicine
Concept or approach in in hematology that is based on generally accepted, published evidence with
recognition of the evidence-source, evidence level, applicability, and the consequences and risk profiles in
individual patients.
Definition (cont.)
• Precision medicine needs to be complemented by a personalized approach in order to manage all
subgroups of patients in an optimal manner.
• Precision medicine is more closely related to disease-specific feature and molecular or cellular
interactions and explores how these feature impact the patient’s diagnosis, prognosis and
outcome in general.
• In drug development, precision medicine focuses more on drug-target interactions and
drug efficacy in cells and patients.
• Personalized medicine relates to multiple aspects of the individual patient in a comprehensive
way, including age, gender, genetic features, epigenetic variables and comorbidities, also mental,
social and psychological aspects.
• In drug development, personalized medicine has to consider multiple patient-related
aspects (mentioned above), drug-drug interactions → in order to develop risk scores,
disease-preventing strategies, or early intervention
“Personalised cancer management – which means giving patients the
optimum treatment according to their individual circumstances (including
their genetics) and the molecular characteristics of their tumors – was a key
theme of ESMO in 2013”
CTLA-4
PD-1
PD-L1
…others
Ongoing clinical trials of PD-1 inhibitors for NPC
Selected Ongoing Phase II/III Immunotherapy Trials in HNSCC
Trial Treatment Population N Intervention
Locally advanced HNSCC (HPV+ for select 780
KEYNOTE-412[1] Pembrolizumab + cis + RT vs placebo + cis + RT
stages/primary sites)
Avelumab + cis + RT vs cis + RT
REACH[2] Stage III/IVb HNSCC 707
Avelumab + cetuximab + RT vs cis + RT
Neoadjuvant nivolumab, surgery, and adj CRT +
IMSTAR-HN[3] Stage III/IV p16- OPC, L, HP, OC 276
adj nivolumab ± ipi vs SoC surgery + CRT
Resectable stage III/IVa L, HP, OC, p16-OPC
KEYNOTE-689[4] 704* Pembrolizumab before surgery/with adj CRT vs surgery
Stage III p16+ OPC
Locally advanced HNSCC treated with
IMvoke010[5] 400* Atezolizumab vs placebo after CRT
curative-intent therapy
Durvalumab + RT vs cetuximab + RT in cis-ineligible
HN004[6] Cisplatin-unfit locally advanced HNSCC 474*
patients
KEYCHAIN[7] Locally advanced p16+ OPC, L, OC 114* Cis + RT vs pembrolizumab + RT
EA3161[8] High-risk HPV-associated disease 744* Maint. nivolumab or observation after 1 yr of cis + RT
*Recruiting patients as of April 2021.
1.. Nivolumab PI. 2. Pembrolizumab PI. 3. Atezolizumab PI. 4. Durvalumab PI. 5. Avelumab PI. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Phase III CheckMate 141: Nivolumab in
Recurrent/Metastatic HNSCC After Platinum Therapy
Stratified by prior
cetuximab
Patients with recurrent or metastatic
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W
HNSCC (oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx),
(n = 240)
progression or recurrence in ≤ 6 mos
after last dose of platinum-based
chemotherapy, p16 documented for Randomized 2:1
determining HPV status (oropharyngeal
cancer only), any prior tx experience, Investigator’s Choice of methotrexate 40 mg/m2/wk IV,
any PD-L1 status docetaxel 30 mg/m2/wk IV, or
(N = 361) cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IV once followed by 250 mg/m2/wk
(n = 121)
▪ Primary endpoint: OS
▪ Other endpoints: PFS, ORR, DoR, safety, biomarkers, QoL
Ferris. NEJM. 2016;375:1856. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com
Questions and limitations
• Is it applicable?
• Will it be affordable? – for example CAR-T cell technology
• Are new diagnostic tools, interpretations and emerging drugs
validated rigorously?
• Not all clinical trials are designed and resourced to evaluate all
precision medicine aspects.
Strategies
• Global data exchange – global validation of new tools
• Employ large pre-existing database
• Establish global competence networks (focus groups)
• Establish reference centers
• Establish centralized first-class diagnostic labs
• Implement uniform evidence based precision and personalized
medicine in local comprehensive cancer centers and tumor boards
• Global data registries, global database
• Establish robust biobanking systems and a molecular tumour board
• Telemedicine