Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Noting-Rehmat Steel (EOL)
Noting-Rehmat Steel (EOL)
(vi) Accordingly consumer provided post dated cheques for the amount of
installments. However only Ist & 2nd installments viz. Rs. 39,55,050/- &
Rs. 7,91,010/- (Total Rs.47,46,060/-) were realized in LESCO Account.
(vii) In 3/2010 the consumer vide letter dated 25-3-2010 (CP-202/1) refused to
make further payment of installments on the plea that demand of security as
per enhanced rates is not justified, therefore excess amount deposited by
him may be refunded.
(viii) In this regard the consumer also filed complaint with NEPRA for which
detailed reply was submitted by CSD vide No. 59121-27 dated 22-12-2010
(F/A). But NEPRA while deciding the case against LESCO ordered to
refund the excess amount recovered over the legitimate amount of
security deposit payable at the time of payment of capital cost, without
any mark up and submit the compliance report within 60 days (F/B).
(ix) In 6/2012, in order to regularize the extended load running on the system
EOL from 515 kW to 1500 kW was approved vide No. 21338-46 dated
20-6-2012 (CP-259) which was implemented vide SJO No. 290 dated 24-
12-2012 (CP-278).
(x) LESCO also filed Writ Petition in Hon’able Lahore High Court against the
above orders of NEPRA (F/C).
(xi) Hon’able Lahore High Court vide Order dated 31-3-2017 has dismissed
the case due to non-prosecution (F/D). Orders of Hon’able Lahore High
Court is not yet received in this office. However a copy of the same has
been supplied by the consumer alongwith his application on 5-1-2018.
(xii) This office vide letter No. 946-47 dated 24-1-2018 requested CSD that the
case may be dealt with at his level being policy matter regarding
enhancement of rates of security. But CSD again forwarded the file to
P&D Directorate for further proceeding.