This document provides an overview of five major ethical theories: relativism, naturalism, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.
1. It compares the views of different theorists on what determines the morality of an act, such as the act itself, its consequences, circumstances, or duty/obligation.
2. It outlines the key constituents of a human act according to each theory, such as knowledge, freedom, and voluntariness.
3. It briefly describes each theory's perspective on truth, the good life, and what makes a person moral.
This document provides an overview of five major ethical theories: relativism, naturalism, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.
1. It compares the views of different theorists on what determines the morality of an act, such as the act itself, its consequences, circumstances, or duty/obligation.
2. It outlines the key constituents of a human act according to each theory, such as knowledge, freedom, and voluntariness.
3. It briefly describes each theory's perspective on truth, the good life, and what makes a person moral.
This document provides an overview of five major ethical theories: relativism, naturalism, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.
1. It compares the views of different theorists on what determines the morality of an act, such as the act itself, its consequences, circumstances, or duty/obligation.
2. It outlines the key constituents of a human act according to each theory, such as knowledge, freedom, and voluntariness.
3. It briefly describes each theory's perspective on truth, the good life, and what makes a person moral.
Give the Theory Theory Theory Theory constituents of the human Act? This theory that Natural law theory refers to the general Utilitarian belongs to a theory This theory is an Knowledge holds that there view that moral rules and principles are in morality that can be act or conduct is Freedom are no objective, absolute and universal truths labeled as consequentialist. considered good Voluntariness universally valid that can be discovered in the nature of What solely matters is the or right thus moral things and in the structure of life itself result of the deed, not the justified morally, principles. This through the used of reasoned reflection. deed itself. not by showing mean that all that is has good moral values and beneficial are not valid consequences or relative to effects but by culture or virtue of its being individual an action that choice. emanates from a sense of duty or moral obligation. View on truth Stoics View Aristotle’s St. Thomas Jeremy John Stuart View on Duty on Natural view on Aquinas’ Bentham’s Mill’s view No matter how Law Natural Law view on view on on pleasure we answer that Natural Law pleasure recognizes only question, we The stoics For those actions that must equated Aristotle, we According to He claims He claims are done out of acknowledge nature with can learn by him, to say that the good that pure duty as the that an act or law and nature what that law as life is one pleasures ones having conduct may be reason and we ought to an that is spent are two moral worth. both right or taught that do and not ordinance for pursuit of types, which Everything else wrong at the what was do because simply bodily are the does not give an same time- say, important nature means it is a pleasures. In quantity and act any moral right in one was to live a intends thatcommand or fact, the quality. value or ethical culture but life certain thing directive goodness is He says, significance. wrong in according to be done or emanating equated with pleasure of another. To put nature. not done. from a pleasure of the mind or it simply, So, the point legitimate sensual the spirit are differing moral applies authority. pleasure. higher than views about the equally to And since it pleasure of same action inanimate is an order, flesh and of may be both nature. “it is binding the body. right at the upon the same time. subjects to obey.” Give the Who is a Who is a Who is a Who is a Who is a Who is a Who is a moral determinants on moral person moral moral moral moral moral person according the morality of an according to person person person person person to Immanuel act. relativist according according according according to according to Kant’s moral moral to stoic’s to to St. Jeremy John Stuart framework? The act itself framework? moral Aristotle’s Thomas Bentham’s Mill’s moral The end or framework moral Aquinas’ moral framework? motive of the ? framework? moral framework? He claims that agent They believe in framework? what makes an The moral right and They According to act right/good circumstance wrong. It is just believe that Aristotle’s Aquinas’ For Mill’s moral and wrong/bad s that they a wise moral framework is utilitarianism, framework, does not depend contend that person framework is to be right and one should on its results or what is knows that to be good obedience wrong, are spend part of consequences, basically right things must therefore is were good is dependent it to feed since all these and wrong for be as they to be to be done on the one’s mind are simply an individual or are and reasonable. and evil is to pleasure or and soul not beyond one’s group may be achieves To be be avoid. pain that an just to satisfy control, hence a wrong or for happiness reasonable act will bring one’s bodily matter of luck or others. and sense is to act in result to. If an need and accident. of purpose accordance act will result physical Therefore, by learning with our to pleasure it cravings. morality as the how to nature which is considered sole and accept the is our right or good exclusive domain necessities rationality. but if it of rational of things To be good results to beings, should be and events. is to be pain then the something of rational in act is which one should our actions considered have total and wrong or control. conduct. bad.