Case Analysis-2

Case: Dose it payoff: Strategies of two banking giants

1. How does HSBC’s IT strategy differ from that of Citigroup’s?
HSBC's IT strategy and Citigroup's IT strategy differ in several key aspects:
1. Operational Focus:
• HSBC's IT strategy primarily focused on centralizing operations and achieving
cost savings by migrating back-office functions to Group Service Centers,
particularly in India and China. This approach aimed at reducing staff costs and
streamlining operations.

• Citigroup's IT strategy centered on delivering superior customer service at

lower costs. They aimed to provide innovative products and services through a
centralized approach to e-commerce, emphasizing trust, privacy, and security
inherent to the Citigroup brand.

2. Emphasis on Customer Services:

• HSBC's IT strategy emphasized enhancing customer services through online
banking and IT staff support for service-improvement projects.

• Citigroup's strategy aimed to empower its business lines with technology,

introducing internet units for e-commerce, e-business, and e-capital markets.
They also focused on integrating global consumer internet financial service
products and e-commerce solutions.

3. Integration of Systems:
• HSBC worked on integrating and standardizing systems worldwide to create a
more efficient and cost-effective global platform. This included the
coordination of comprehensive global credit card technology.

• Citigroup pursued a similar approach by integrating Citibank systems into a

standard global platform. They expanded their capabilities in various areas,
such as pension and mutual fund administration.

4. Technology Partnerships:

• Both banks formed strategic alliances with technology companies to improve

customer offerings. HSBC collaborated with IBM to develop the Interactive
Financial Services (IFS) system and partnered with Sky digital satellite for the
UK's first TV banking service.

• Citigroup partnered with Netscape, AOL, and Oracle to provide financial advice,
online banking, insurance, and mortgage services. They also expanded their
services into the Asia Pacific region with Citibank Commerce, an internet
corporate banking service.
 Case Analysis-2

2. Which of these two banks is cleverer in its IT investment strategy?

It's challenging to definitively determine which bank had a cleverer IT investment
strategy because the effectiveness of their strategies depended on their specific goals
and market conditions. Both banks had different objectives, and the success of their
strategies can be measured in various ways, such as cost savings, revenue growth,
customer satisfaction, and market share expansion.

HSBC's IT Investment Strategy Strengths:

1. Operational Efficiency: HSBC's strategy successfully centralized back-office
functions, resulting in significant cost savings. They reduced staff costs and streamlined
operations by migrating processes to Group Service Centers in India and China.

2. Global Coordination: HSBC strategically coordinated global credit card technology

and managed Y2K concerns efficiently. Their approach ensured a smooth transition
into the new millennium.

3. Customer Services: HSBC's IT investments contributed to a considerable increase in

online banking customers, showing their commitment to enhancing customer
services.

Citigroup's IT Investment Strategy Strengths:

1. Customer-Centric Approach: Citigroup focused on delivering superior customer
service and providing innovative products. They prioritized trust, privacy, and security
while centralizing e-commerce efforts.

2. Global Expansion: Citigroup expanded its global reach and product offerings,
achieving rapid integration of systems. They also made strategic acquisitions to boost
their credit card business and introduced biometric technologies for customer
convenience.

3. Technological Partnerships: Citigroup formed strategic alliances with leading

technology companies, enabling them to offer a wide range of financial services and
solutions.

The "cleverness" of their respective IT investment strategies depends on their specific

goals. HSBC's strategy was clever in achieving significant cost savings and Y2K
readiness. In contrast, Citigroup's approach was clever in expanding its global footprint
and delivering innovative customer services. Therefore, both banks had clever
strategies within the context of their unique objectives.
 Case Analysis-2
3. How do you measure the return of their IT investments?
Measuring the return on IT investments for both HSBC and Citigroup involves a more
in-depth analysis of various key performance indicators (KPIs) tailored to their specific
IT strategies. Below are some in-depth metrics and factors to consider:

HSBC:
1. Cost Savings: Examine the actual cost savings generated by centralizing back-office
functions in India and China. Calculate the reduction in staff costs and operational
expenses attributable to this strategy, accounting for factors like staff salaries,
infrastructure costs, and maintenance expenses.

2. Online Banking Growth: Assess the growth in online banking customers beyond just
the number. Dive deeper into user behaviour, such as transaction frequency, types of
transactions, and customer satisfaction with the online platform.

3. Technology Integration Efficiency: Analyze the efficiency of technology integration

projects. Measure the time and resources saved by consolidating technology systems
and whether these efforts improved customer service and reduced operational
complexities.

4. Risk Mitigation: Evaluate the cost savings derived from effective Y2K compliance and
business continuity planning. Consider factors like the cost of non-compliance,
potential losses due to system failures, and insurance premiums.

5. Customer Retention: Assess whether the IT investments contributed to customer

retention and loyalty. Calculate customer churn rates, customer feedback, and the
impact on long-term relationships with the bank.

Citigroup:
1. Customer Lifetime Value: Measure the lifetime value of acquired customers. Assess
how long customers stay with Citigroup, their transaction volumes, and the overall
profitability of customer relationships. This can be broken down by different customer
segments.

2. Revenue Growth: Evaluate the revenue growth from acquired credit card accounts.
Calculate the revenue generated from interest charges, transaction fees, and other
revenue sources linked to these accounts.

3. Technology Platform Efficiency: Analyze the efficiency of technology platforms and

their impact on operational costs. Consider factors like infrastructure costs, support
and maintenance expenses, and the scalability of the platforms.
 Case Analysis-2
4. Global Expansion ROI: Calculate the return on investment for global expansion
efforts. Consider the cost of market entry, customer acquisition, and the profitability
of international operations.

5. Security and Privacy: Assess the cost-effectiveness of maintaining security and

privacy. Measure expenses related to data protection, identity theft prevention, and
privacy assurance, as well as any costs associated with security breaches.

6. Partnership Impact: Evaluate the effectiveness of partnerships in terms of customer

acquisition and service expansion. Measure the cost-effectiveness of partnering with
companies like Netscape, AOL, and Oracle in terms of customer acquisition and service
expansion.

7. Customer Feedback: Analyze customer feedback and satisfaction surveys to gauge

the qualitative impact of IT investments. Customer sentiment and perceptions of the
bank's technology offerings are crucial indicators.

8. Competitive Position: Assess Citigroup's competitive position in the industry.

Measure its market share, compare it with competitors, and consider the impact of IT
investments on maintaining or gaining market share.

Group name:
Amogh Shedbal – 22B105
Harshit Agarwal – 22B115
Soham Parki – 22B152
Tejus wali – 22B153
Aasif Khan – 22B154
Suraj Chopade – 22B155