Purchasing power parity (PPP) Calculation of GNI using a common set of international prices for all

goods and services, to provide more accurate comparisons of living standards.

Human Development Index (HDI) An index measuring national socioeconomic development, based on
combining measures of education, health, and adjusted real income per capita.

The New Human Development Index The most widely used measure of the comparative status of
socioeconomic development is presented by the United Nations Development Programmed (UNDP) in
its annual series of Human Development Reports. The centerpiece of these reports, which were initiated
in 1990, is the construction and refinement of its informative Human Development Index (HDI).

Developing world: As noted earlier, there are important historical and economic commonalities among
developing countries that have led to their economic development problems being studied within a
common analytical framework in development economics. These widely shared problems are examined
here in detail on an issue-by-issue basis. At the same time, however, it is important to bear in mind that
there is a great deal of diversity throughout the developing world, even within these areas of broad
commonality. The wide range of income, health, education, and HDI indicators already reviewed is
sometimes called a “ladder of development.”11 Different development problems call for different
specific policy responses and general development strategies. This section examines the 10 major areas
of “diversity within commonality” in the developing world.

A frontier market is a country that is more established than the least developed
countries (LDCs) but still less established than the emerging markets because it is too
small, carries too much inherent risk, or is too illiquid to be considered an emerging
market. A frontier market is a developing country that does not fulfill the criteria of being called
an emerging market. The size of the country, restricted markets, development, liquidity, and risk
are the characteristics of the frontier market.
Theory: The classic post–World War II literature on economic development has been dominated by four
major and sometimes competing strands of thought: (1) the linear-stages-of-growth model, (2) theories
and patterns of structural change, (3) the international-dependence revolution, and (4) the neoclassical,
freemarket counterrevolution. In recent years, an eclectic approach has emerged that draws on all of
these classic theories.

Stages-of-growth model of development A theory of economic development, associated with the

American economic historian Walt W. Rostow, according to which a country passes through sequential
stages in achieving development.

Harrod-Domar growth model A functional economic relationship in which the growth rate of gross
domestic product (g) depends directly on the national net savings rate (s) and inversely on the national
capital-output ratio (c).
Structural-change theory The hypothesis that underdevelopment is due to underutilization of resources
arising from structural or institutional factors that have their origins in both domestic and international
dualism. Development therefore requires more than just accelerated capital formation.

Structural transformation The process of transforming an economy in such a way that the contribution
to national income by the manufacturing sector eventually surpasses the contribution by the agricultural
sector. More generally, a major alteration in the industrial composition of any economy.

Lewis two-sector model A theory of development in which surplus labor from the traditional agricultural
sector is transferred to the modern industrial sector, the growth of which absorbs the surplus labor,
promotes industrialization, and stimulates sustained development.

Surplus labor The excess supply of labor over and above the quantity demanded at the going free-
market wage rate. In the Lewis two-sector model of economic development, surplus labor refers to the
portion of the rural labor force whose marginal productivity is zero or negative.
 capital and hence is more productive, if
investment represents innovation in that it solves problems faced by the firm, and if other firms see
what the investing firm has done and imitate it (“learning by watching”), generating externalities.
Under development: Complementarity An action taken by one firm, worker, or organization that
increases the incentives for other agents to take similar actions. Complementarities often involve
investments whose return depends on other investments being made by other agents. Economic agent
An economic actor—usually a firm, worker, consumer, or government official—that chooses actions so
as to maximize an objective; often referred to as “agents.” Coordination failure A situation in which the
inability of agents to coordinate their behavior (choices) leads to an outcome (equilibrium) that leaves
all agents worse off than in an alternative situation that is also an equilibrium.

Big push: A concerted, economy-wide, and typically public policy–led effort to initiate or accelerate
economic development across a broad spectrum of new industries and skills.

O-ring model An economic model in which production functions exhibit strong complementarities
among inputs and which has broader implications for impediments to achieving economic development.
Middle-income trap A condition in which an economy begins development to reach middle-income
status but is chronically unable to progress to high-income status. Often related to low capacity for
original innovation or for absorption of advanced technology, and may be compounded by high
inequality

Underdevelopment trap: A poverty trap at the regional or national level in which underdevelopment
tends to perpetuate itself over time.

Poverty trap :A bad equilibrium for a family, community, or nation, involving a vicious circle in which
poverty and underdevelopment lead to more poverty and underdevelopment, often from one
generation to the next.
Multiple equilibria: A condition in which more than one equilibrium exists. These equilibria sometimes
may be ranked, in the sense that one is preferred over another, but the unaided market will not move
the economy to the preferred outcome.
The Big Push: A Graphical Model Assumptions In any model (indeed, in any careful thinking), we need to
make some assumptions, sometimes seemingly large assumptions, to make any progress in our
understanding. The analysis of the big push is no exception to this rule. The assumptions we use for the
big push analysis here can be relaxed somewhat, though at the expense of requiring more mathematical
technique, but it should be noted that we cannot relax our assumptions as much as we are accustomed
to doing in simpler microeconomic problems, such as those that assume perfect competition. Here we
cannot meaningfully assume perfect competition in the modern sector, where increasing returns to
scale and hence natural monopoly, or at least monopolistic competition, prevail. To paraphrase Paul
Krugman, if we think development has something significant to do with increasing returns to scale, then
we will have to sacrifice some generality to address it. We will make six types of assumptions.

Factors. Factor payments. Technology. Domestic demand. International supply and demand. Market
structure.
Measurement of Inequality: In this section, we define the dimensions of the income distribution and
poverty problems and identify some similar elements that characterize the problem in many developing
nations. But first we should be clear about what we are measuring when we speak about the
distribution of income and absolute poverty. Economists usually distinguish between two principal
measures of income distribution for both analytical and quantitative purposes: the personal or size
distribution of income and the functional or distributive factor share distribution of income.

Income inequality The disproportionate distribution of total national income among households.
Absolute poverty The situation of being unable or only barely able to meet the subsistence essentials of
food, clothing, and shelter.

Total poverty gap (TPG) The sum of the difference between the poverty line and actual income levels of
all people living below that line.
Kuznets’s Inverted-U Hypothesis Simon Kuznets suggested that in the early stages of economic growth,
the distribution of income will tend to worsen; only at later stages will it improve.22 This observation
came to be characterized by the “inverted-U” Kuznets curve because a longitudinal (time-series) plot of
changes in the distribution of income—as measured, for example, by the Gini coefficient—seemed,
when per capita GNI expanded, to trace out an inverted U-shaped curve in some of the cases Kuznets
studied, as illustrated in Figure 5.10. Explanations as to why inequality might worsen during the early
stages of economic growth before eventually improving are numerous. They almost always relate to the
nature of structural change. Early growth may, in accordance with the Lewis model, be concentrated in
the modern industrial sector, where employment is limited but wages and productivity are high.