Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Hand Grip Endurance With Correlation of Deep Breathing Among Pregnant Women A Cross-Sectional Study
Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Hand Grip Endurance With Correlation of Deep Breathing Among Pregnant Women A Cross-Sectional Study
53350/pjmhs2023173220
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
Background: Physiology of the mother, changes constantly during pregnancy including reduced HGS that is require for
carrying the child after delivery. Activities of daily living require manual gripping tasks that require dynamic and static
contractions. Predictor of upper extremity function is Hand Grip Strength and handgrip endurance. Screening of hand grip
strength during antenatal care is still uncommon.
Objectives: To compare static and dynamic hand grip endurance in pregnant females and to find its correlation with deep
breathing.
Material and Methods: The study recruited 40 participants of primi-gravida of 1st and 2nd trimester, between ages 20 and 35
years from SHALAMAR GYNAE OPD. The participants assigned to the groups (Group 1: with DB, Group 2: without DB) based
on their trimester and gravidity. Static and dynamic endurance assessed using hand held dynamometer.
Results: Mean Age ± Standard deviation for deep and non-deep breathing groups was 22.85 ± 2.30 and 24.05 ± 0.514. Age
had negative little or low correlation with all variables of deep and non-deep breathing groups. Peak hand grip strength was
moderately correlated with hand grip endurance with deep and non-deep breathing group (r = -0.628, r = -0.566 respectively).
Static hand grip endurance was weakly correlated with peak hand grip strength in deep breathing group (r = -0.239) whereas
static hand grip endurance had little, if any correlation with peak hand grip strength in deep breathing group (r = -0.165).
Clinical implication: Management of hand grip strength and endurance improves general well being of pregnancy. By
employing deep breathing exercises hand grip strength can be improved.
Conclusion: Peak hand grip strength and endurance improved markedly in 2nd trimester with deep breathing. Deep breathing
can improve peak hand grip endurance and peak hand grip strength in pregnancy with increasing trimester. Whereas static and
dynamic hand grip endurance has insignificant effect in different trimester.
Keywords: Pregnancy, deep breathing, trimester, endurance, peak grip endurance
Registration and Ethical Letter: This human based survey was static grip endurance and dynamic grip endurance based on their
also registered on clinical trial registry with the registration number trimesters.
of NCT05679791. Moreover, this work has been reported in line Table 3 shows correlation between different variables. In
with the STROCSS criteria (13). Ethical letter was obtained from deep breathing group, age had little or no positive correlation with
institutional review board of Shalamar Medical and Dental College peak grip strength (r = 0.220) whereas in non-deep breathing
and Teaching Hospital. group, age had little or no negative correlation with peak grip
Sample Size Calculation: Sample size was calculated by using strength (r = -0.178). Age, in deep breathing group, had moderate
WHO, sample size calculated with the significance and power level negative correlation with static hand grip endurance (r = -0.526).
of 95 percent and r (correlation) was anticipated 0.60 using Other than that, age had negative little or low correlation with all
OpenEpi, available at: variables of deep and non-deep breathing groups. Peak hand grip
https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSMean.htm. strength was moderately correlated with hand grip endurance with
Exclusion Criterion: Primigravida with history of gestational deep and non-deep breathing group (r = -0.628, r = -0.566
diabetes mellitus, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, COPD, respectively). Static hand grip endurance was weakly correlated
cardiovascular diseases and musculoskeletal comorbidities was with peak hand grip strength in deep breathing group (r = -0.239)
excluded from the study. All the participants were subjected to the whereas static hand grip endurance had little, if any correlation
detailed obstetrical scan first at first trimester and secondly on third with peak hand grip strength in deep breathing group (r = -0.165).
trimesters for the confirmation of their age and any patient with
polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios or with cord compression Table 1. Comparison of Descriptive Data of Study Groups
Standard Standard
were excluded from the study. Groups Variables Mean
Deviation Error
Sampling & Data Collection Procedure: One group with odd Age 22.85 2.300 .514
serial number enrolled to perform procedure with deep breathing. Peak Hand Grip
24.05 11.861 2.652
On the other hand, 2nd group with even serial number enrolled to Strength
Deep
Static Hand Grip
perform the procedure without deep breathing. The subjects were Breathing
Strength
15.75 7.511 1.679
made to sit comfortably with feet rest on the floor, hip and knee at Dynamic Hand Grip
43.80 18.295 4.091
90 degrees, shoulder maintaining adduction, and elbows flexed on Strength
Age 24.05 2.819 .630
armrest comfortably between 90 to 120 degrees. The wrist Peak Hand Grip
positioned between 0 and 30 degrees of extension and slight in 16.00 8.310 1.858
Strength
Non-Deep
ulnar deviation. Subjects instructed to exhale through mouth during Breathing
Static Hand Grip
17.60 10.308 2.305
the grip exertion and inhale through nose during relaxation, the Strength
Dynamic Hand Grip
grip held for 3 seconds then 15 seconds, a rest of 2 minutes were Strength
44.60 22.484 5.028
given to all the participants between the grip repetitions, 3
repetitions noted and the maximum reading considered the peak Table 2: Comparison of Study Variables in 1st and 2nd Trimester based on Breathing.
Mean + Standard Deviation P
grip strength. Then static and dynamic hand grip endurance was Group Variables
Value
1st Trimester 2nd Trimester
assessed in both groups; one group performed the mentioned Peak Grip
28.30 ± 13.857 19.80 ± 8.053 .048*
protocol with deep breathing and other performed without deep Strength
breathing. Scores were recorded through Hand held dynamometer. Deep Static Grip
13.90 ± 6.822 17.60 ± 8.058 .466
Breathing Endurance
The duration of static holding of dynamo meter were noted by Dynamic Grip
stopwatch. Subjects were encouraged to maintain the contraction 40.50 ± 16.828 47.10 ± 19.980 .452
Endurance
for as long as possible. The procedure was terminated when the Peak Grip
25.50 ± 7.322 16.50 ± 9.571 .161
Strength
subjects failed to maintain maximal voluntary contraction.
Non-Deep Static Grip
Data Analysis Plan: The data was entered and analyzed using Breathing Endurance
19.70 ± 8.870 15.50 ± 11.655 .181
SPSS 25. Numerical data like age, height, weight will be presented Dynamic Grip
42.50 ± 15.939 46.70 ± 28.343 .006*
in the form of mean S.D whereas quantitative data like gravida and Endurance
parity status and endurance etc. will be presented in the form of
frequency (percentage)or endurance time in minutes and seconds
and HGS in kg. after fulfilling parametric assumptions. Hand grip
strength stratified according to group will be assessed using
independent sample t test. p value of 0.05 or less considered as
significant.
RESULTS
A total of 40 participants were segregated into two groups of 20
participants with the mean ages of 22.85 ± 2.30 and 24.05 ± 0.514
years. Descriptive statistics were applied for peak hand grip Figure 1. Scatter Diagram static and dynamic hand grip strength of deep
strength, static hand grip strength and dynamic hand grip strength. breathing group
Independent t-test was used to compare the two groups as
explained in Table 4.1. Mean age, mean static hand grip
endurance and mean dynamic hand grip endurance was higher in
non-deep breathing group whereas peak hand grip strength was
higher in deep breathing groups.
On appliance of Independent Sample t test, Table 2 shows
that in deep breathing group, mean peak hand grip strength was
higher in 1st trimester whereas static grip strength and dynamic
grip endurance was higher during 2nd trimester. In non-deep
breathing group, we see that the results are contrariwise to deep
breathing group i.e., mean peak hand grip strength was higher in
2nd trimester whereas static grip strength and dynamic grip
endurance was higher during 1st trimester. Table 2 shows Figure 2. (Dynamic and Static hand grip scatter plot for non-deep breathing
independent t test which was applied for peak hand grip strength, group)
6. Baxi G, Tigdi SR, Palekar TJ, Basu S, Sule K. Static and dynamic correlates during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. BMC
handgrip endurance in young adults. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12884-
and Occupational Therapy. 2017;11(4):118. 021-04003-0. PMID: 34348682; PMCID: PMC8340369.
7. Karatrantou K. Dynamic handgrip strength endurance: A reliable 16. Abdullahi A, Bala AS, Danazumi SM, Abubakar SM, Adamu RI,
measurement in older women. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. Truijen S, et al. Determination of hand grip strength and its correlates
2019;42(3):E51-E6. during pregnancy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and
8. White C, Dixon K, Samuel D, Stokes M. Handgrip and quadriceps Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1-13.
muscle endurance testing in young adults. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):1- 17. Mbada CE, Adeyemi AB, Omosebi O, Olowokere AE, Faremi FA.
8. Hand grip strength in pregnant and non-pregnant females. Middle
9. Staszkiewicz R, Ruchlewicz T, Szopa J. Handgrip strength and East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health. 2015;2(2).
selected endurance variables. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2002;7:29- 18. Lee J-A, Sechachalam S. The effect of wrist position on grip
42. endurance and grip strength. The Journal of hand surgery.
10. Trosclair D, Bellar D, Judge L, Smith J, Mazerat N, Brignac A. Hand- 2016;41(10):e367-e73.
grip strength as a predictor of muscular strength and endurance. The 19. Babbar S, Shyken J. Yoga in pregnancy. Clinical Obstetrics and
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011;25:S99. Gynecology. 2016;59(3):600-12.
11. Prastini MSA, Herawati L, Frety EE, Aditiawarman A. The Effect Of 20. Rashed AM, Abdel-Wahab N, Moussa EMM, Hammam N.
Progressive Muscle Relaxation and Slow Deep Breathing Association of hand grip strength with disease activity, disability and
Combinations on Sleep Quality of Pregnant Women. Halaman quality of life in children and adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic
Olahraga Nusantara (Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan). 2022;5(1):158-69. Arthritis. Adv Rheumatol. 2018 Jun 28;58(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s42358-
12. McCormick A, Meijen C, Marcora S. Psychological determinants of 018-0012-1. PMID: 30657067.21.
whole-body endurance performance. Sports medicine. 21. Morlino D, Marra M, Cioffi I, Sammarco R, Speranza E, Di Vincenzo
2015;45(7):997-1015. O, De Caprio C, De Filippo E, Pasanisi F. A proposal for reference
13. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, Dowlut N, Iosifidis C and values of hand grip strength in women with different body mass
Mathew G, for the STROCSS Group. The STROCSS 2019 Guideline: indexes. Nutrition. 2021 Jul-Aug;87-88:111199. doi:
Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111199. Epub 2021 Feb 13. PMID: 33744638.22.
International Journal of Surgery 2019;72:156-165. 22. Żelaźniewicz A, Pawłowski B. Maternal hand grip strength in
14. Ma X, Yue Z-Q, Gong Z-Q, Zhang H, Duan N-Y, Shi Y-T, et al. The pregnancy, newborn sex and birth weight. Early Hum Dev. 2018
effect of diaphragmatic breathing on attention, negative affect and Apr;119:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.03.004. Epub 2018
stress in healthy adults. Frontiers in psychology. 2017:874. Mar 17. PMID: 29558661.
15. Abdullahi A, Bala AS, Danazumi SM, Abubakar SM, Adamu RI,
Truijen S, Zakari MK et al. Determination of hand grip strength and its