- POAT ADAM F7AFOA Oromia Bank Inter-Office Baankii Oromiyaa C22 Ti Communication From: Deputy Chief Human Resources Office Contact No:- 011-557-2053 July 5, 2023 To: All Head Office Organs, and District Offices OB Subject:- Communicating the Second Employee Engagement Survey Result and Suce Actions As we all remember, the second round employee engagement survey was conducted between May 27, 2023 and June 07, 2023. Accordingly, more than 73% of the questionnaires were collected and analyzed. This means over 4000 employees have participated in the survey. As it has been communicated in our previous memos and guidelines, all work units who have participated in the previous survey shall be evaluated as per the improvement level they have achieved based on the survey result. As per the current survey result, our overall score has improved from 51% to 66%; whereas the detail result of each work unit is annexed herewith. While you review yourself as per the data indicated in the annex, we would like you to note the following points for your better understanding and use of the survey result:= 1. The corporate level employee engagement index against the given target improvement is 119.5% [Highly Effective]. This shall be used by Directors and above positions to review themselves as per their given KPI [Learning & Growth section of the Employee Engagement Index who have a corporate goal], 2. All work units engagement level are evaluated against their given baseline [benchmark] and target if they have participated in the previous survey, yy E lL ona ne Reon eosTf'the number of participants were less than five in a Division or Team [work unit] then, Wwe have regrouped them along with their next level team [Department or Division] to determine the work units’ level of employee engagement, 4. Ithere are more than one Division or Team whose participants were less than five each then, we have regrouped them all under their parent Department to determine the work units’ level of employee engagement, 5. As the number of respondents under a Deputy / Chief Office is less than five, we have used average score of their reporting work units [Department or Office] to determine the work units’ level of employee engagement, 6. The Deputy Executive Assistant to the CEO Office, Board Secretariat, and the Ethics & Anti-Corruption Unit are all grouped under one Umbrella- CEO Office as all report to the CEO and all have less than five individuals in their specific unit to determine the work units’ level of employee engagement, 7. For those Branch Offices who have participated in the previous survey and have less than five respondents in this survey, we have given them their previous score as the system does not provide their result for anonymity purpose, 8. For new Branch Offices who have participated in this survey with 5 or more participants but not in the previous one, the current score [survey result] shall be taken as their baseline [benchmark] for the next survey, 9. For those new Branch Offices who have participated in this survey, but has less than five number of participants, there will be no score and no evaluation to be made for the 2022/2023 fiseal year as the system does not provide their result for anonymity purpose, 10. The maximum score that can be given is 165% as per the Performance Management Guidelines and any score greater than 132% is considered as “Exceptional” achievement. General lel in Scoring Your Engagement Level * The annexed table has eight columns where it indicates each work unit's engagement level target [column 2], actual score of the current survey against the given target [column 5], the evaluation result/ level [column 6] and percentage achievement [column 7] which shall be used as reference points to make your evaluation as per your specific | a. Coot MH) eework unit [KPI] on your signed performance contract agreement as well as on the ‘Trakstar system, Assuming that the given target after the previous survey is filled on your Trakstar measurement section, you shall only fill the evaluation level [column 6] and write the specific percentage achievement when the contract closing form [column 7], You are expected to make / conduct the debriefing of the survey result with your respective team and send monthly reports to the HR Business Partnering Division including your-progress level. For this purpose, the overall score of your work unit isoromiabank.com Annex 1- EEI by Work Unit along with Percentage Achievement against Target 2nd Round Employee Engagement Survey [2022+23) eens Count of Against Sr en am ONS aT eerie) fe mn E Evaluation [6] [7] ce ‘Aba Jifar Branch Minimally Effective <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Abdi Nono Branch % fective Abdisa Aga Branch 0 u 40% 1.98 | Minimally Effective 40% | Benchmark for new ‘Abebe Bikila Branch 136 UL 41% 2.05 | Exceptional | 151% — bebe Tufa Branch 273 7 76% 3.81 | Exceptional 140% Ey Abichu Branch 1.61 $ 81% 4.07 | Exceptional | 165% | Abinet Branch 323 i 73% 3.65 | Effective 98% ‘Abomsa Branch 2.68 1 50% 2.50 | Minimally Effective 50% | < 5 Partcipani-Previous score given [Abubeker Sidik Branch 401 2 2.42 | Minimally Effective 60% ‘Abuna Gindeberet Branch 1.89) o 1.70 | Minimally Effective 34% | < 5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Accounts & SWIFT Divi 37 33 2.33 | Minimally Effective 63% ‘Adaba Branch 1.95 1 2.67 | Exceptional 137% ‘Adama Branch 186 io 4.01 | Exceptional 165% ‘Adama District Office 297 32 3.77 | Highly Effective 127% ‘Adami Branch arf peal 2.87 | Effective TP ‘Adele Branch 0 4 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Partieipant-No benchmark ‘Addis Ketema Branch 221 is 3.64 | Exceptional 165% | ‘Adi-haki Branch 12 ° 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| < 5 Participant-No benchmark along, with Administration Divisoin 135 | Director 45% Exceptional 150% ‘Adola Branch 132 2] 56% Exceptional 165% ‘Adulala Branch 0 5 TI% Effective 77% | Benchmark for new ‘Africa Godana Branch 1.59) a 52%. Exceptional 162% - [ Agarfa ranch fo Effective 31% | jpant-Previous score givenoe ‘Agaro Branch 149) 3B 52% 2.59 | Exceptional 165% | ‘Agemsa Branch 12 2 13% 2.15 | Exceptional 165% Ageri Tulu Branch 12 6 76% 3.82 | Exceptional 165% ‘Akaki Branch isa 2 86% 431 | Exceptional 165% ‘Al-adala Branch 244 7 63% 3.15 | Highly Effective 129% ‘Alamura Branch 0 9 53% 2.63 | Minimally Effective 53% | Benchmark for new ‘Alem Bank Branch 3.97 1B 82% 4.10 | Highly Effective 103% ‘Alemgena Branch 241 18 87% 434 | Exceptional 165% ‘Aleta Wendo Branch 184 12 63% 3.15 | Exceptional - ‘Ali Bira Branch 277 10 61% 3.07 | Highly Effective 111% Ali Branch 42 ul 71% 3.54 | Effective 4% ‘Al-Nur Branch mi 9 54% 2.72 | Highly Effective 130% ‘Alshaya Branch 12 1 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous seore given ‘Alternative Banking along with Division 2.15 | Director 4% 3.70 | Exceptional 165% ‘Amana Branch 2.28 4 41% 2.05 | Minimally Effective 41% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Ambo Branch 162 20 9% 3.96 | Exceptional 165% ‘Ameya Branch 2y[ 9 65% 3.26 | Highly Effective 117% ‘Amin Branch 3.03 | 1 56% 2.80 | Minimally Effective ‘56% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Anfo Branch 423 4 83% 4.15 | Effective 83% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Anger Gute Branch 146 3 56% 2.82 | Exceptional 165% ‘Angetu Branch 0 o 0%. 0.00 | No Evaluation No Svore __ | <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Ansar Branch 428 9 a% 3.11 | Effective 73% ‘Arabsa Branch 3.95) % 79% 3.93 | Highly Effective 99% “Anwar Mespid Branch 3 4 56% 2.80 | Minimally Effective ‘86% | <3 Panticipant-Previous score given ‘Aposto Branch 1.89 3 33% 1.65 | Not Effective 33% | <5 Panticipant-Previous score given ‘Arada Branch 324 9 ai 3.18 | Effective 98% ‘Arat Kilo Branch 291 15, 46% 2.32 | Effective 80% ‘Aiba Minch Branch 12 7 6% 3.44 | Exceptional 165% Architectural & ‘along with Engineering Design Team | ___ 3.31 | Director 2% 3.60 | Highly Effective 109% ‘Areb Sefer Branch 154 ry 2% 3.12 | Exceptional 165% ‘Arefa Branch 428 15 Minit Effective 49% aNAro Branch 3.98 7 67% 334 | Effective ‘Arkan Branch 0 6 97% 4.86 | Effective Benchmark for new ‘Arsi Negelle Branch, 167, 17 76% 3.80 | Exceptional ‘Arsi Robe Branch 157, 12 88% 4.40 | Exceptional ‘Arsi Sire Branch 422 8 2% 4.09 | Effective Asendabo Branch 3.92 ul 68% 3.40 | Effective “Asko Branch 0 1 % 0.00 | No Evaluation “= Participant-No benchmark Asossa Branch 12 16 44% 2.18 | Exceptional “Assasa Branch 2.93 7 67% 3.34 | Highly Effective ‘Assela Branch 12 20 61% 3.04 | Exceptional Asset & Facility includes Management Division 15 | team 62% 3.09 | Exceptional 165% ‘Asset Management and along with Logisties Division 3.14 | Director 3.45 | Highly Effective 110% Aster Ganno Branch 12. 10 2.95 | Exceptional 165% Atkilt Tera Branch 3.76 10 3.43 | Effective 91% ‘Atlas Branch 12 im 3.13 | Exceptional 165% ‘Atote Branch 3.23 z 3.18 | Effective 98% ‘Autobus Tera Branch 3.57 12 4.27 | Highly Effective 119%: ‘Aware Branch 12 7 4.72 | Exceptional 165% “Awaro Branch 2.78 15 3.28 | Highly Effective 118%. ‘Awash Melkasa Branch 2.15 i 1.95 | Minimally Effective 30% | <5 Participant-Previous score given “Awash Sebat Kilo Branch 12 7 3.86 | Exceptional 185%. ‘Aweday Branch 12 1B 63% 3.16 | Exceptional 165% [ Ayat Branch, 37 ia 1% 3.54 | Effective 96% “Ayer Tena Branch 3.98 10 19% 3.93 | Effective 99% Babicha Branch 0 a 32% 410 | Effective 82% | Benchmark for new Babile Branch 139) 41% 2.07 | Highly Effective 130% _— Babo Branch 3.97 31 46% 2.30 | Minimally Etfective 58% Bahir Dar 337 4 80% 3.98 | Highly Effective 118% Bakanisa Branch 434 un 83% 4.15 | Effective 96% Bakie Branch 0. = SG 79% 3.96 | Effective 79% | Benchmark for new Bako Branch 39% 1.95 | Minimally Effective 33%oromiabank.com Balcha Aba Nefso Branch 323 10 79% 3.96 | Highly Effective 123% Bale Robe Branch 12 23 35% 1.76 | Exceptional 147% Baraka Branch 3.85) 7 76% 3.82 | Highly Effective 99% Baro Tumsa Branch 3.79 9 85% 4.26 | Highly Effective 13% Bashale Branch 3.43 16 55% 2.76 | Effective 81% Bati Branch 12. 9 74% 3.69 | Exceptional 165% ‘Batu Branch 1.56 16 | 70% 3.48 | Exceptional 165% Bechobore Branch 3.21 9 90% 4.49 | Exceptional 140% Bedelle Branch 2.35) 18, 41% 2.03 | Effective Bedessa Branch, 3.08 14 61% 3.04 | Effective Begi Branch 12 1 0% (0.00 | No Evaluation ipant-No benchmark Bekelcha Branch | 232 4 42% 2.10 | Minimally Effective ipant-Previous score given Benishangul Branch 0 2 % 0.00 | No Evaluation ‘No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Bensa Daaye Branch 12 0 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given Bethel Branch 331 i 56% 2.82 | Effective 85% Bifole Branch 0 1 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | 5 Participant-No benchmark Biftu Branch 2.95 15 86% 4.30 | Exceptional 146% | Bilal Branch al 423 8 61% 3.03 | Effective 2% Birbirsa Branch 3.23 12 73% 3.65 | Highly Effective 113%. Birmaji Branch 273 8 84% 421 | Exceptional 154% Bisrate Gebriel Branch 3.09 4 70% 3.49 | Highly Effective 113% along with Board Secretariat 12 | CEO's Office 48% 2.40 | Exceptional 165%. Bokoji Bra _| 2B 1B 46% 2.32 | Effective 85% ‘Boke Branch 0 o 0% (0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Boku Branch 414 u 85% 4.26 | Highly Effective 103% ‘Boku Shenen Branch 408 2 80% 4.00 | Effective ‘80% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Bole Branch 371 22 75% 3.75 | Highly Effective 101% Bole Bulbula Branch o 8 60% 3.02 | Minimally Effective (60% | Benchmark for new Bole Michael Branch. 35 u 70% 3.48 | Highly Effective 99% Bomb Tera Branch 0 0 % 0.00 | No Evaluation ‘No Seore | <5 Participant-No benchmark Bonga Branch 3.87 7 81% 4.07 | Highly Effective 105% Bore Branch 1.93 BX | 2.21 | Highly Effective 114%. & ‘Boro Branch ‘No Evaluation <5 Participant-No benchmarkoromiabank.com Boroda Branch 0 0 W% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __ | <5 Participant-No benchmark Boro Korma Branch 371 7 72% 3.60 | Effective 95% ‘Boset Branch 342, 4 710% 3.52 | Highly Effect 103% Bote Branch 0 6 70% 3.50 | Effet 70% | Benchmark for new Branch Audit Division 333 30 78% 3.68 | Highly Effective 110% = ‘Bukari Branch 2.27 7 82% 4.08 | Exceptional 165% Bulbula Branch 3.45) 9 66% 3.29 | Effective 95% uli Branch 0 2 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Bule Hora Branch 433 9 71% 3.85 | Effective 1% Burayu Branch 3.3 18 65% 3.26 | Effective 87% ‘Bure Branch 3.63, 10 2% 3.59 | Effective 99% Burka Branch 3.11 12 60% 3.02 | Effective _ 97% ‘Burka Jato Branch 3.46 9 52% 2.60 | Effective 15% ira Branch 4.15 7 75% 3.76 | Effective ‘21% 4.08 36 55% 2.15 | Effective 61% Cash Management Division 215 10 71% 3.84 | Exceptional _165% 1.66 i T2% 3.61 | Exceptional ane 3.98 9 85% 4.25 | Highly Effective 372 2 71% 3.55 | Effective 71% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given 2.01 i 1% 4.53 | Exceptional 165% ‘Change and Project ‘Management Department 4 80% | 4.00 | Highly Effective _| 100% | Change and ‘Transformation along with Management Division 4 | Director 80% 4.00 | Highly Effective 100%. Chelelega Branch 35) 13 61% 3.04 | Effective 96% inclu Ethics and Chief Executive's Office 247 48% 2.40 | Effective 97% Chilalo Branch, 48% 2.40 | fective 72% Chiro Branch 36% 1.80 | Minimally Effective 36% | < 5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Chole Branch, 49% 2.45 | Minimally Effective 49% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given Chulule Branch Effectivealong with ‘Compliance Division. 2.93 | Director 91% 4.55 | Exceptional 155% Average of Construction Project reporting Management Office 3.31 | units 72% 3.60 | Highly Effective 109% Contract Administration along with _and Supervision Team 331 | Di 2% 3.60 | Highly Effective 109% | Chief Corporate Banking ‘Average of | and International Trade reporting Office 2.44 | units 54% 2.71 | Highly Effective 11% Average of Corporate Banking all reporting Directorate 3.39 | teams 49% 245 | Effective 2% Conporate Financing along with Division 3.48 | Director 89% 4.45 | Highly Effective 128% Chief Corporate Strategy Average of & Transformation reporting ‘Management Office 3.13 | units 75% 3.73 | Highly Effective 119% | Collateral Valuation wmf 2 83% 4.15 | Exceptional 165% Corporate Audit Division 3.33 9 78% 3.90 | Highly Effective 17% Corporate Business ‘ong with Relationship 3.39 | Director 49% 245 | Effective 2% ‘Corporate MIS & Reporting 3.78 3 81% 4.07 | Highly Effective 108% Credit Analysis & includes Appraisal Department 3.48 | division 89% 4.45 | Highly Effective 128% (Credit Information & ‘Documentation Division 3.48 2 15% 3.75 | Highly Effective 108%: Credit Monitoring & Recovery Management includes Directorate 3.27 | division 76% 3.80 | Highly Effective 116%. Credit Monitoring 327 8 89% 4.46 | Exceptional 136% 2s “19 3.62 | Exceptional 165%‘Average of oromiabank.com Deputy Chief Credit Operaioin Management reporting Office 4.06 | units 83% 4.13 | Highly Effective 102% Average of Cyber Security reporting Directorate 3.42 | units 14% 3.70 | Highly Ertective 108% Dabe Boku Branch 12 1] 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Dale Branch 2.75 i 81% 4.07 | Exceptional 148% | Dale Dembel Branch 24 22 31% 1.86 | Effective 8% Daleti Branch 415 3 81% 4.06 | Effective B% Dallo Mana Branch 12 is 53% 2.66 | Exceptional 165% Daka Adi Branch o 3 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark DBA & MIS Division 353 8 O% 3.08 | Effective Darimu Branch 0 7 3.55 | Effective Benchmark for new - Darme Branch 131 1 26% 1.30 | Not Effective <5 Participant-Previous score given Debeso Branch 3.77 7 81% 407 | Highly Effective Debre Birhan Branch 1.67 9 4.15 | Exceptional Debre Markos Branch 261 9 3.26 | Highly Effective Deder Branch 2.25 1s. 3.74 | Exceptional Delo Sebro Branch 1.76 4 31% 1.55 | Not Effective “< 5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Dembela Branch 1.78 ° 87% 434 | Exceptional & E Dembi Dolo Branch 3.97 16 50% 2.52| Minimally Effective | ___ 64% _ Demo Dadi Branch 4.15 3 81% 4.05 | Effective 81% | <5 Participant-Previous seore given Deneba Branch o 1 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score <5 Participant-No benchmark Average of reporting Deputy Chief HR Office 3.73 | units 81% 4.07 | Highly Effective 109% Average of reporting Deputy Chief CS Office 12 | units 66% 3.30 | Exceptional 165% ‘Average of nits — 64% 3.18 | Highly Effective 101% | Not AssignedAverage of Deputy Chief Marketing reporting and Partnership Office units 10% 3.49 | Exceptional 165% | Not Assigned Dera Branch 9 60% 3.02 | Exceptional 165% Derara Branch, 12 61% 3.07 | Effective 75% i Derartu Branch WL TM 3.83 | Exceptional 165% Dertu Branch 6 68% 3.40 | Effective 86% Dessie Branch 15 74% 3.71 | Highly Effective 112% ze Dessie District Office 1B 76% 3.82 | Exceptional 140% Dhera Branch 16 70% 3.50 | Effective 93% Dichato Branch o 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Dida Boke Branch 0 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation ‘No Score | = 5 Participant-No benchmark. Didimtu Branch 2 71%. 3.53 | Effective 90% Average of Digital Banking reporting Department 4.08 | units 3% 89% Diksis Branch 12 | 55% | __2.77 | Exceptional 165% Dilla Branch 279 19 66% 3.29 | Highly Effective 118% Dire Sololia Branch 159. 3 28% 1.40 | Effective 88% Dodolla Branch 3.03 28 58% 291 | Effective 96% Doka Bore Branch 12 “19 62% 3.09 | Exceptional 165% Dolo Ado Branch 12 4 78% 3.90 | Exceptional 165% Dubuluk Branch 12 5 89% 4.43 | Exceptional 165% Dugo Branch 3.1 & 73% 3.64 [17% Dukem Branch 3.72 10 60% 2.98 80% Dulo Branch 3.49 2 19% 3.94 | Highly Effestive 113% Doni Branch 0 3 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Partcipant-No benchmark Duna Braneh 12 2 20% | 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given 0 3 | 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation | No Score__| <5 Partcipant-No benchmark 3.19 36 1% 3.67 | Highly Effective L1s% isa Adugna Branch 436 9 60% 3.01 6% ECX and Account Opening 2.15 [Seg “4 3.70 | Exceptional 165% | Ego Branch EAA 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score givenOromiabank.com Egdu Branch 0 3 79% 3.95 | Effective 7% | Benchmark for new hil Berenda Branch 3.42 2 55% 2.75 | Effective 80% | Ejaji Branch 221 3 40% 2.00 | Minimally Effective 40% | <5 Panicipant-Previous score given Ejere Branch ST 9 59% 2.97 | Exceptional 165% [Eka Abado Branch Pe oem 4 78% 3.90 | Effective 78% | <5 Participant- Previous score given Ekka Branch 1.42 3 63% 3.16 | Exceptional 165% ‘Elemo Branch 4.05 18 83% 4.17 | Highly Effective 103%. z lili Branch 3.74 13 66% 332 | Effective 39% | “Entrepreneurship Division 215; 3 74% 320 | Exceptional 165% Enchini Branch 2.78 15 54% | —_ 2.69 | Effective 97% ‘Ertu Branch 4.12 10 1% 3.57 | Effective 57%. Eteya Branch 2.63) 15 70% 3.52 | Exceptional 134% | Ethics & Anti-Corruption along with Unit 3.88 | CEO's Office 48% 2.40 | Minimally Effective 2% Export and Inward Payment Division 3.33 4 69% 3.45 | Highly Effective 104% Fasiledes Branch 32 10 16% 3.79 | Highly Effective 118% Fatih Branch 159 in 60% 2.98 | Exceptional 165%. Branch 2.38 8 5% 3.77 | Exceptional 158% aaa nance & Investment Management Division 3.58 u 62% 3.09 | Effective 16% Finance and Investment includes Directorate 3.58 | division 69% 3.45 | Effective 56% Average of | Financial Management reporting Department 3.49 | units 87% 4.34 | Highly Effective 124% - cha Branch 34 2 a% 3.20 | Minimally Effective 64% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Finfinne Branch 3.64 W 2% 3.12 | Effective 86% Firissa Abba Wagga Branch 3.2, 10 86% 4.30 | Exceptional 138%. Fitche Branch 12 22 50% 2.51 | Exceptional 165% Furi Branch. 3.99 4 72% 3.61 | Effective 90% Ez i Gambella Branch 12 1s| 59% 2.94 | Exceptional 165% Gara Aluto Branch i Minimally Effective <5 Participant-Previous score givenOromiabank.com Gara Bolo Branch 0 2 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation NoScore | <5 Participant-No benchmark Gara Gora Branch 16 7 22% 4.59 | Exceptional 165% Gara Lugo Branch 0 6 83% 4.15 | Effective 83% | Benchmark for new Garba Guracha Branch 145 i6 48% 2.22 | Exceptional 153% Gasera Branch 3.35 1B 63% 3.14 | Effective 94% Geda Branch 322 21 74% 3.69 | Highly Effective 99% Gedo Branch 3.35) 13 78% 3.91 | Highly Effective 117% Gefersa Nono Branch 165 17 60% 3.01 | Exceptional 165%. Gelan Branch 3.69) u 71% 3.53 | Effective 96% ‘General Accounts Divsion 3.49) 18 90% 4.49 | Highly Effective 129% Gelemso Branch 146 1 25% 1.25 | Not Effect 25% | <5 Participant-Previous seore given | General Tadesse Biru Branch 401 10 92% 4.60 | Highly Effective 115% General Wako Gutu Branch 3.35 10 53% 2.67 | Effective 80% ‘Genet Hotel Branch 321 9 82% 4.09 | Highly Effective 127% Gera Branch 2.54 3 46% 2.30 | Minimally Effective 46% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Geri Branch 4a 4 87% 435 | Effective 87% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Ghimbi Branch 3.28 18 61% 3.06 | Effective 93% Ghimbichu Branch s 89% 4.47 | Effective 89% | Benchmark for new Gibe Branch 0 32% 1.60 | Not Effective 32% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Gida Ayana Branch 9 63% 3.15 | Effective TT Ginchi Branch 16 71% 3.53 | Exceptional 150% Gindeberet Branch 16 31% 2.55 || Effective 7% Ginnir Branch 21 71% 3.54 | Exceptional 165% ‘Goba Branch 7 88% 4.38 | Exceptional 165% ‘Gobessa Branch i 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Pariicipant-Previous score given ‘Gode Branch ia] 79% 3.96 | Exceptional 165% (Gofa Branch 18 71% 3.57 | Highly Effective 106% Golbo Branch 16 56% 2.82 | Effective 33% Gololcha Branch u 71% 3.54 | Exceptional 165% “Gondar Branch 9 68% 3.39 | Exceptional 145% Gore Branch 13. 69% 3.46 | Effective 85% ‘Goro Branch ExceptionalGuder Branch 26 ai 48% 2.40 | Minimally Effective 48% ipant-Previous score given ‘Gudura Branch a9 1 81% 4.05 | Effective 81% | 5 Participant Previous score given Guje Gefersa Branch 2.03 ly 3.39 | Exceptional 165%. Gulele Branch 2.69 18 64% 3.19 | Highly Effective 118%. ‘Guliso Branch 2 1 85% 4.23 | Highly Effective 101%. Gursum Branch 0 4 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Paricipant-No benchmark Hachalu Hundesa Branch 2.72 7 61% 3.07 | Highly Effective 113% ‘Hafat Issa Branch 1.69) B 68% 3:38 | Exceptional 165%. Haji Fedilu Branch 12 2 20% 1,00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Hajiadem Sado Branch 251) 9 66% 3.32. | Exceptional 132%: Halchisa Branch 0 zm 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Hakim Branch 2.65 7 86% 431 | Exceptional 16% Halal Branch 3.84 8 66% 3.29 | Effective 86% ‘Hangatu Branch 0 7 65% 3.27 | Minimally Effective 65% | Benchmark for new Hamza Branch 2.26 4 41% 2.05 | Minimally Effective 1% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Haramaya Branch 1.76 B 18% 3.71 | Exceptional ‘Harar Branch 2.98 22 64% 3.22 | Highly Effective ‘Harbu Branch 2.04 17 68% 3.38 | Exceptional Haro Dumal Branch 2.36 1 66% 3.28 | Exceptional - Haro Sabu Branch 33 10 89% 4.43 | Exceptional Haro Sorga Branch p 4 36% 1.80 | Minimally Effective 36% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘anufa Branch 146) 3 61% 3.03 | Exceptional 16596 Hawassa Branch 3 18 81% 4.03 | Exceptional 134% Hawi Branch 42% 2.10 | Minimally Effective <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Hayu Branch 70% 3.51 | Effective | Mijira Branch 74% 3.69 | Exceptional Hikma Branch 13% 3.64 | Effective Hirmata Branch TH 3.87 | Highly Effective Hima Branch 73% 3.65 | Effective <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Holeta Branch 58% 2.91 | EffectiveHora Arsedi Branch 3.02 9 75% 3.75 | Highly Effective 124%. Hora Branch 3.22 7 19% 3.96 | Highly Effective 106% Hordofa Chengere Branch 2.64 8 87% 4.36 | Exceptional 165% Hosaena Branch 2.45 3 61% 3.05 | Highly Effective 124% HAR Business Partnering along with Division _— 3.14 | Director 79% 3.95 | Highly Effective 126% Average of HI Development reporting Department 4.02 | units 85% 4.25 | Highly Effective 106% HR Operatoins includes Directorate 3.14 | division 78% 3.88 | Highly Effective 124% Huda Branch | oe mane, 71% 3.83 | Effective 77% | Benchmark fornew Huluka Korma Branch 164 10 3% 3.67 | Exceptional 165% ‘Human Resources Office 3.33 6 69% 3.44 | Effective 92% Humera Branch 3.53 7 82% 4.09 | Highly Effective 116%. Hurufa Rare Barnch 3.96 i 25% 1.25 | Not Effective 25% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given Huruta Branch 12 W 56% 2.81 | Exceptional 165%. TFB Operations Depariment 3.14 10 61% 3.07 | Effective 98% IFB Operations & along with ‘Supervision Division 3.14 | Director 66% 3.30 | Highly Effective 105% ‘along with JFB CRM 3.14 | Director 66% 3.30 | Highly Effective 105%. Imam Ahimed Branch 2.86 8 84% 4.21 | Exceptional 147%. Import & Outward Payment Division 3.88 23 2% 3.12 | Effective 80% Injibara Branch 0 1 0%, 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Average of Chief Internal Audit reporting Department 3.33 | units 8496 4.20 | Highly Effective 126% Average of {International Trade reporting Services Department units 59% 2.97 | Effective 76% Irecha Branch 0% (0.00 | No Evaluation No Seore | = 5 Partieipant-No benchmark Institutional Customey RM 49% 245 | Effective 2% LoeOromiabank.com Tnternet Mobile & Agent Banking 4.08 6 80% 3.99 | Effective 9896 IT and Systems Audit along with 3.33 | Ditector 84% 4.20 | Highly Effective 12696 ‘Trends Division 3.16 10 82% 4.10 | Highly Effective 17 Call Center Team 4.08 3 84% 4.18 | Highly Effective TT Infrastructure Division 3.33. 27{ 68% 3.40 | Effective Average of Chief TT Infrastructure & reporting Services Office 4.02 | units 68% 3.42 | Effective 85% TT Innovation & ‘Modernization includes Department 3.16 | division 57% 2.85 | Effective 0% along with IT Innovation Division 3.16 | Director 57% 2.85 | Effective 0% TT Research and along with Development Team 3.42 | Director 74% 3.70 | Highly Effective 108% IT Project Management Division 3.16 10 72% 3.58 | Highly Effective 113%, TT Security & Compliance Team 3.42 o| 58% 2.88 | Effective 84% Average of IT Systems Operation reporting Department 3.53 | units 69% 3.47 | Effective 98% Jafar Branch En 4 50% 2.50 | Minimally Effective 50% | < 5 Participant-Previous score given [aja Branch. 43 3 84% 4.20 | Effective 44% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Jara Branch 1.65 3 62% 3.08 | Exceptional 165% Jate Branch 2.92 9 81% 4.03 | Exceptional 138% - Jehan Gelan Branch 3.82 6 33% 4.15 | Highly Effective 109% Jeldu Branch 15 12 62% 3.11 | Exceptional 165% Jemo Branch 371 15 66% 3.28 | Effective 18% Jigjiga Branch 3.86 16 84% 4.20 | Highly Effective 109% os Jile Branch 3 89% 4.44 | Exceptional 165% a Jinka Branch 18 67% 3.37 | Exceptional [165%Oromiabank.com Siren Branch 0 6 85% 425 | Fifective 85% | Benchmark for new Jitu Branch 3.64 8 69% 3.46 | Effective 95% Kebena Branch 0 3 % (0.00 | No Evaluation NoScore | <5 Participant-No benchmark [ Kajima Branch 1.64 0 29% 1.45 | Not Effective 29% | < 5 Participant-Previous score given Kake Branch 2.23 1 40% 2.00 | Minimally Effective 40% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Kale Branch _ 0 10 46% 2.30 | Minimally Effective Benchmark for new Kality Branch 142 Tete 60% 2.98 | Exceptional Kamise Branch 2.06 15 87% 4.36 | Exceptional | i z - Kara Alo Branch 423 10 73% 3.65 | Effective ‘Kare Goha Branch 12 6 91% 4.57 | Exceptional - Karra Korrie Branch 3.58 2 63% 3.13 | Effective Kasanchis Branch 2.81 15 74% 3.72 | Exceptional Kebede Bizunesh Branch 43 i 2% 3.58 | Effective Kechema Branch 191 u 56% 2.81 | Exceptional Kelo Branch 12 7 98% 4.92 | Exceptional a Kera Koricha Branch 2.95 12 60% 3.00 | Highly Effective Kera Shewa Branch 3.86 7 2% 3.61 | Effective Kercha Branch 14 4 61% 3.07 | Exceptional Kereyu Branch 2.99 16 66% 3.28 | Highly Effective Kersa Branch Lal 1 24% 1.20 | Not Bffective 724% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Keta Burayu Branch 2.48) 9 56% 2.81 | Highly Effective 113% Kilole Branch 0 4 W% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Kilt Lume Branch 134 9 74% 3.70 | Exceptional 165% Kiram Branch 27 10 81% 4.04 | Exceptional 149% Knowledge Management along with Team 4.02 | Director 85% 425 | Highly Effective 106% Kobo Branch 0 2 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Kofele Branch 271 il 41% 2.04 | Effective 15%, ‘Kolfe Branch Ls 13 52% 2.61 | Exceptional 165% Kolobo Branch \ 0 1 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Kombolcha Brifich 14 87% 4.34 | Highly Effective 124% | tents gh wo] nm] a4 eneane 2oromiabank.com ‘Konso Branch 0 1 O% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Kore Branch. 0 6 63% 3.17 | Minimally Eifective 63% | Benehmark for new Kotebe Branch 23 1B 72% 3.60 | Exceptional 156% Koye Feche Branch ee % (0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Kulefau Al-Rashid Branch 12 7 20% 1.00 | Effective 83% ‘Kumsa Moreda Branch 3.34 i 83% 4.15 | Highly Effective 124% Kurkura Branch 12 4 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given KYC & CD Division 12, 32 37% 1.85 | Exceptional 155% Lafto Branch 2.89 10 76% 3.81 132% Lamberet Branch 12. 8 38% 440 165% Leadership Development Team 4.02 1 85% 4.25 | Highly Effective 106%. ‘Lemen Branch 0 2 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Lebu Branch 3.06 4 70% 3.48 | Highty Effective 114% | Lega Oda Branch 24 9 64% 321 134%. Legal Advisory Division p 6 67% 3.33, 165% ani 2 5 6% 3.35 165%. Average of reporting Legal Department 2 | units 67% 3.34 | Exceptional 165% ‘Lege Dima Branch 0 6 70%. 3.48 | Effective 70% | Benchmark for new Lege Tafo Branch 3.53, 13 62% 3.11 | Effective 38% ‘Leka Branch 337 15 3.86 | Highly Effective 115% nene ‘Lem Hotel Branch 3.93, 10 4.00 | Highly Effective 102% ‘Lemi Kura Branch 12. 6 3.96 | Exceptional 165% Lenjiso Diga Branch 3.57 2 3.35 | Effective 67% | <5 Participant-Previous score given deta Area Branch 37. il 4.01 | Highly Effective 108% | Limu Kosa Branch 2.13 10 2.58 | Highly Effective 121% ‘Logia Branch 2.38 15 3.18 | Exceptional 14% Lumie Branch 3.94 2 3.75 | Effective 75% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Maliyu Branch . a 1,50 | Not Effective 30% | © Participant-Previous score given ‘Mamo Mezemir Branch Ey) 6 4.25 | Exceptional 165% Maintenance Team Exceptionaloromiabank.com Markato Branch 2 19 4% 420 | Exceptional 165% Marketing & Research Directorate 3.59 70% 3.49 | Effective 97% Research and Publication along with Division 3.59 | Director 70% 3.49 | Effective 97% Marketing and along with Communication Division 3.59 | Director 70% 3.49 | Effective 97% Brodiet Development and | Customer Management along with Division 3.59 | Director 0% 3.49 | Effective 97% along with Public Relation Division 3.59 | Director 70% 3.49 | Effective 97% along with Partnership Division 3.59 | Director 0% 3.49 | Effective 97% ‘Mechara Branch 2.63 Z 66% 3.30 | Highly Effective 126% ‘Marwa Branch ig 4 20% 1,00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Maya Branch ° 0 0% | (0.00 [ No Evaluation | NoSeore | <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Medina Branch 221 8 22% | 4.12 | Exceptional 165% Megado Branch 428 4 85% 425 | Effective 85% | =5 Participant Previous score given Megalla Branch 3.99) 2 63% 3.13 | Effective 79% Meka Branch 35 3 75% 3.74 | Highly Effective 107% Mekbul Branch 2.64 4 49% 2.45 | Minimally Effective 49% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Mekelle Branch 12 0 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Meki Branch 17 i8 68% 3.40 | Exceptional 165% | ‘Meko Bili Branch 12 8 59% 2.93 | Exceptional 165% ‘Mekoy Branch 4.29 8 71% 3.54 | Effective 82% ‘Melba Branch 3.64 7 82% 4.12 | Highly Effective 113% ‘Melka Branch - 3.74) 8 71% 3.54 | Effective 95% Melka Dida Branch 12 1 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant: Previous score given Melka Gefersa Branch 414 4 81% 4.05 | Effective 81% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Melka Rafuu Branch 12 1 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Mendi Branch 154 16 36% 1.82 | Highly Effective 118% Meraro Branch (~ 4 0% 0,00 | No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark / Mersa Branch CoS 10 83% 4.17 | Exceptional 14%oromiabank.com “Mesalemia Branch 259) 15 78% ‘Exceptional 150% ‘Meta Robi Branch 3.84 1 B% 3.65 | Effective 73% | <$ Participant-Previous score given ‘Metahara Branch 3.82, 2 73% 3.65 | Effective B% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Meti Branch 0 4 0%. 0.00 | No Evaluation < 5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Meitu Branch 325) 16 17% 3.84 | Effective Mexico Branch 3.19 16 77% 3.87 | Highly Effective Michile Branch 431 8 8% 3.71 | Effective Milki Branch 3.6 3. 68% 3.42 | Effective ‘Mina Branch 12 9 70% 3.50 | Exceptional Miyo Arda Jila Branch 4.1 3 90% | 4.51 | Highly Effective ‘Mizan Aman Branch 12 2 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Modjo Branch 2.17 8 17% 3.85 | Exceptional 165%. ‘Moenco Branch 4.02 8 69% 3.45 | Effective 86% ‘Mogole Branch 3.35 8 7% 3.72 | Highly Effective 105% ‘Moyale Branch ea 23 70% 3.52 | Exceptional 165% ‘Muger Branch __ 2.52 9 62% 3.12 | Highly Effective 124% ‘Mugi Branch 431 0 85% 4.25 | Effect 85% | <5 Participant- Previous score given | Muka Turi Branch 12. u 74% 3.72 | Exceptional 165% Atleast ‘muloo branch. maintain 4 4.70 | Effective 94% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Nedjo Branch 1.61 19 3.33 | Exceptional 165% | ‘Negelle Branch 402 24 3.57 | Effective E 19% ‘Nekemte Branch 2.87 17 3.94 | Exceptional 137% ‘Nekemte DO 3.34 26 3.32 | Highly Effective 100%. North Finfinne District Office 3.33 24 Exceptional 142% ‘Nuho Gobena Branch 428 4 Effective 44% | <5 Paricipant-Previous score given’ Nur Bilu Branch 0 0 No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Nur Mesjid Branch 158 13 Exceptional 165% Nua Era Branch 434 3 Effective 86% | <5 Participant-Previous score given (Oda Branch 2.86 23 Effective 72% (Oda Nabe Branch Highly Effective __ 104% | (Oda Shenen Branch No Evaluation No Score | <5 ParticipantNo benchmark Olen Chiti Branch Minimally Effective <5 Participant-Previous score givenOromiabank.com ‘Onesmos Nesib Branch a 64% 3.20 | Minimally Effective 64% | < 5 Participant-Previous score given Payment Systems along with Division 4.08 | Director 57% 2.85 | Effective 70% Procurement Management Division Ls 1 16% 3.82 | Exceptional 165% Procurement and Facility includes | Management Directorate 15 | division 45% 2.25 | Exceptional 150% Project Management along with Division 4 | Director 80% 4,00 | Highly Effective 100% Reconciliation Division 3.49) 5 80% 4.00 | Highly Effective 115% Rehama Branch 0 0 % 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Rephie Branch 47 8 78% 3.89 | Effective 93% Recovery Management along with Division, 3.27 | Director 16% 3.80 | Highly Effective 116% ‘Average of Chief Retail & SME reporting Banking Office 1.2 | units 16% 3.80 | Exceptional 165% Retail & SME Financing Division 3.48 7 83% 4.17 | Highly Effective 120% Reyan Branch 0 0 0% (0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Risk Management Division 293, 7 86% 4.29 | Exceptional 146% Chief Risk Management and Compliance Department 91% 4.55 | Exceptional 155% Robale Branch 9 TA% 3.69 | Highly Effective 99% Sabian Branch 15 53% 2.64 | Effective 79% ‘Sadekka Branch 0 6 75% 3.76 | Effective 75% | Benchmark for new ‘Sagure Branch 199 15 42% 2.11 | Highly Effective 106% Sales & CRM Directorate 2s 34 80% 4.02 | Exceptional 165% Salogora Branch 177 4 59% 2.93 | Exceptional 165% Saris Branch 3.66 12 64% 3.20 | Effective 87% 2.64 17 72% 3.61 | Exceptional 137% Security Di 3.14 15 66% 3.30 | Highly Effective 105%. Sedecha Branch =O. 4 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation ‘No Score ‘<5 Participant-No benchmarkeo | oromiabank.com | Selale Ber Branch, 35 3 57% 2.87 | Effective 82% Selam Mesjid Branch 12 4 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Sena Branch 3.65 9 68% 3.42 | Effective W% Sendafa Bakie Branch 2.6 10 4.06 | Exceptional 156% | Serity Branch 34 8 3.85 | Highly Effective 113% Shateta Branch 2.63 z. 3.25 | Highly Effective 124% ‘Shaikiso Branch 32 2 75% 3.75 | Highly Effective 117%. Shalla Branch 1.63 10 78% 3.89 | Exceptional 165% Shambu Branch 3.9 13 60% 2.99 | Bifective 75% Shareholder Accounts Division 3.49 9 78% 3.89 | Highly Effective 112% ‘Shashemene Branch 2.49 20 60% 2.99 | Highly Effective 120% Shashemene District Office 2.56 28 72% 3.59 | Exceptional 140% Shebe Branch 12 6 29% 4.43 | Exceptional 165% ‘Shebu Ejersa Branch 4.52 9 82% 4.10 | Effective 91% ‘Shecha Branch, 0 1 0% 0.00 [ No Evaluation No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Sheger Branch 247 3 45% 2.25 | Minimally Effective 45% | <5 Participant-Previous score given _ ‘Shegole Branch 2.83 8 53% 2.64 | Bifective 53% Shenen Gibe Branch 2.48 17 53% 2.66 | Highly Effective 107% Shenen Jida Branch o| 5 81% 4.05 | Effective 81% | Benchmark for new Sheno Branch 1.98 3 36% 1.80 | Minimally Effective 36% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Sheraro Branch 431 3 90% 4.49 | Highly Effective 104% eS ‘Shewa Robit Branch 181 9 62% 3.10 | Exceptional 165% | Shire Branch 12 0 W% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | 5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Sibu Sire Branch 3.29 10 66% 3.31 | Highly Effective 101% ‘Sida Dabale Branch 1.75 5 B% 3.65 | Exceptional 165% Siltana Branch 0 5 93% 4.63 | Effective 93% | Benchmark for new ‘Sinke Branch 3.95 9 61% 3.33 | Effective 4% SME and CRM. 2.15 78% 3.70 | Exceptional 165% ‘Sof Oumer Branch } 147 a 35% 1.76 | Highly Effective 120% Sokoru Branch 91% 4.55 | Highly Effective 112%oromiabank.com Sora Lome Branch 12 3 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given South Finfinne District Office 38 19 78% 3.92 | Highly Effective 103% Stadium Branch 321 8 61% 3.36 | Highly Effective 105% Strategy Management incudes, Department 3.78 | division D% 3.60 | Effective 95% Strategie Planning and ‘along with, Innovation Division 3.78 | Director 2% 3.60 | Effective 95% Store Management along with Supervisor 15 | Division 49% 2.45 | Exceptional 163% Sulula Dula Branch 0 i W (0.00 | No Evaluation No Score | = 5 Participant-No benchmark Sulula Garbi Branch 37. 6 80% 4.00 | Highly Effective “108% iia: — Sululta Branch 2.12, 19 61% 3.06 | Exceptional 144% Sumeya Branch 3.99 8 51% 2.57 | Minimally Effective 63% ‘Suminit Branch 139) 4 60% 2.99 | Exceptional 5 eps System Support & ‘Analysis Division 3.33 10 79% 3.93 | Highly Effective Talent Acquisition Divi 3.14 10 82% 4.11 | Highly Effective 131% Talent Development along with Office 4.02 | Director 85% 4.25 | Highly Effective 106% Tabor Branch 12 3 20% 1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <3 Participant-Previous score given ‘Tana Branch 3.27 17 1% 3.95 | Highly Effective 121% | Teji Branch 437 8 78% 3.91 | Effective 89% “Tekwa Branch 3.97 4 76% 3.80 | Effective 76% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Teltele Branch Las 1 24% 1.20 | Not Effective 24% | <5 Participant-Previows score given Tepi Branch 437 1 87% 4.35 | Effective 87% | <5 Participant-Previous score given Tero Branch 3.48 6 69% 3.43 | Effective 99% Togwuchale Branch 152| 0 26% 1.30 | Not Effective 26% | <5 Participant-Previous score given “Torban Obo Branch 0 6 95% 473 | Effective 195% | Benchmark for new “Total Reward Division Bl4-| 16 65% 3.26 | Highly Effective 104% ‘Transport Management ‘Supervisor Exceptional 150%oromiabank.com ‘Treasury & Fund Management Division 3.49 7 81% 4.03 | Highly Effective 115% ‘Tufa Muna Branch 43 6 68% 3.40 | Effective 79% Tulema Branch 0 4 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Tulu Bolo Branch 408 10 58% 2.90 | Effective 11% ‘Tulu Dimtu Branch 1.98 2 67% 3.37 | Exceptional 165% ‘Talu Ejersa Branch 44 8 2% 3.08 | Eifective 69% Tulu Jemo Branch 41 6 71% 3.53 | Effective 86% “Tul Meti Branch 413 7 84% 422 | Highly Effective 102% ‘Tulu Wechecha Branch 3.04 8 76% 3.80 | Highly Effective 125% Uke Branch 0 L W% 0.00 [ No Evaluation ‘No Score | <5 Participant-No benchmark Uri Branch. 1.96 3 85% 4.23 | Exceptional 165% ‘Uraga Branch 0 4 % 10.00 | No Evaluation No Score | = 5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Wachamo Branch 0 4 % 10.00 | No Evaluation No Score ___| = 5 Participant-No benchmark ‘Utawayu Branch 14 B 44% 2.21 | Exceptional 158% [_ ‘Wadessa Branch 2.99 24 69% 3.47 | Highly Effective 115% ‘Wayu Branch. 409 2 90% 4.50 | Effective 90% | = 5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Welabu Branch 34 7 88% 4.42 | Highly Effective 130% ‘Welaita Sodo Branch 247 8 65% 3.26 | Highly Effective 132% ‘Welego Branch 3.93 8 70% 3.51 | Effective 39% ‘Wendogenet Branch 188 1B 45% 2.25 | Exceptional 122% ‘Werka Branch o 7 70% 3.48 | Effective 70% | Benchmark for new West Finfinne District Oftice 297 38 665% 3.28 | Highly Effective 110%. ‘Wirtu Branch 3.33 u 69% 3.43 | Highly Effective 103% ‘Woldia Branch 3.19 8 T% 3.61 | Highly Effective 113% g a ‘Woliso Branch 2.85) 15 79% 3.95 | Exceptional 139% Wolkite Branch 3.28 3 62% 3.10 | Minimally Effective 62% | <5 Participant-Previous score given ‘Wolo Sefer Branch 2.12 i 66% 3.28 | Exceptional 155% z Yabello Branch 137) 23 53% 2.66 | Exceptional 165% aaa Yanfa Branch 0 z % 0.00 | No Evaluation No Score __| < Participant-No benchmark ‘Yaya Gulele Branch 26 5 89% 4.43 | Highly Effective 108% YouBrack ros" 80% 401 | Highly Effective 11%‘Yerer Branch 3.41 13 39% 1.93 | Minimally Effective 5% Yeshi Debel 3.99) 8 63% 3.15 | Effective 79% Yi 0 0 0% 0.00 | No Evaluation ‘No Score __| <5 Participant-No benchmark Zoi ey 12 2 20% | __1.00 | Not Effective 20% | <5 Partcipant-Previous score given