Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kim KindDemocracyConfucian 2016
Kim KindDemocracyConfucian 2016
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of Hawai'i Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Philosophy East and West
6 - On this question, see also David Elstein, "The Future of Confucian Politics in East
Asia/' Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 5, no. 3 (201 6).
Sungmoon Kim
City University of Hong Kong
sungmkim@cityu.edu. hk
Philosophy East & West Volume 66, Number 4 October 2016 1347-1352 1 347
© 201 6 by University of Hawai'i Press
To bring this back to my original point, there seems to be a more general model of democ-
racy than Confucian democracy that is operative in the book, one that stresses the impor-
tance of a vibrant public sphere as part of exercising collective self-determination and
ensuring democratic accountability. And this, I take it, is modeled on what he calls the
"semirepublican mode of Korean democracy" (p. 281 ). This could be more clearly distin-
guished from other models of liberal democracy by the key components or constituents
that comprise it.
Does this mean that in my political theory of Confucian democracy, the Confucian
part is a mere adjective to an otherwise Western-deliberative model of democracy?
Not quite, because in my theory the Confucian part is constitutive of the mode of
democratic deliberation and jurisprudence by virtue of Confucian public reason(ing)
as well as the substantive content of public policy and law. For example, as my court
case of expressive liberty in chapter 10 shows, Confucian public reasoning makes a
substantive contribution to the legal process in which the moral value of expressive
liberty is balanced with Confucian civility.8 In this regard, my idea of Confucian de-
mocracy is moderately perfectionist not only in the sense that it permits the state
to publicly promote certain Confucian values (such as filial piety) in terms of civic
Notes
This comment was originally prepared for an author-meets-critics panel at the 201 5
American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Meeting held in Vancouver.
I would like to thank David H. Kim for organizing the panel and Jeffrey Flynn and
two other participants (Stephen C. Angle and David Elstein) for their valuable com-
ments. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant
funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014S1 A3A2043763).
1 - Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Law and Custom in Korea: Comparative Legal History
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012); Sungmoon Kim, ed., Confucian-
ism, Law, and Democracy in Contemporary Korea (London: Rowman and Little-
field International, 2015).
3 - For instance, see Sungmoon Kim, Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and
Practice ( New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 121-125.
5 - See Jack Knight and James Johnson, The Priority of Democracy: Political Con-
sequences of Pragmatism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 201 1 ).
6 - John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems (Athens, OH: Swallow, 1 954), p. 111.
9 - Jiang Qing, A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can
Shape Its Political Future, trans. Edmund Ryden (Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 2012).