Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interactive Multimedia Materials in Chemistry 10
Interactive Multimedia Materials in Chemistry 10
IN CHEMISTRY 10
commerce Web site.It is in this premise that the adoption of ICT enhances the quality of learning and
researcher was motivated to conduct this study, improves the quality of education. This is consistent
hopefully to bring to the fore the importance of with the study by Gallego (2017) who argued that, for
multimedia as a device to advance the intellectual a successful improvement of the quality of education,
skills of the learners and to integrate and change a country needs implementation of ICT policies and
enormous quantities of information that explain regulations that must be effective and vigorous at all
today’s fast paced changing culture. levels.Relatively, Se (2016) proved in their study that
computer assisted instruction group performed
Research Questions significantly better in mathematics learning and that
the time taken by the computer assisted instruction
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the group was nearly two-thirds of the time taken by the
developed interactive multimedia materials in selected traditional group to complete the instruction on the
topics in Chemistry for Grade 10 students of Sta.Lucia selected topic.
High School during the school year
2019-2020. Specifically, it sought answers to the Multimedia learning tools could assist and help
following questions: motivate students by supplementing traditional
teaching modalities with learner-centered learning
1. What are the topics in Chemistry 10 that are suitable through application and practice (Son & Simonian,
for the development of Interactive Multimedia 2016). Likewise, Ignacio (2017) mentioned in his
Materials? study that interactive multimedia learning contributed
2. How do the experts and the Chemistry teachers to the development of independent learning skills in
evaluate the developed multimedia instructional students. Independent learning strategies elevate the
materials in terms of the following criteria? students’ interest in their subjects and competitiveness
2.1 Format; when it comes to different concepts and lessons. This
2.2 Content; kind of method does not only require the students to
2.3 Presentation and Organization; depend on the teacher’s lectures, but they are also
2.4 Appropriateness and Updatedness; and given the right to explore and discover new knowledge
2.5 Technical Aspect? on their own. This also prepares them for their future
3. Is there a significant difference in the evaluation of careers as they take responsibility for the important
the two groups of respondents on the developed things that must be done.
interactive materials?
4. What is the performance level of the learner’s Another study about multimedia was conducted by
respondents before and after using the developed Soriano (2015) entitled “Interactive Multimedia
materials based on their pretest and posttest mean Materials in Physics and its Implication” which
score? showed that there was a significant difference in the
5. Is there a significant difference between the pretest achievement of the students taught using multimedia
and posttest mean scores of the respondents? materials. Thus, the students with improved
6. What are the comments and suggestions of the two instructional materials obtained the highest
groups of respondents to improve the developed achievements score at posttest. Also, utilization of the
multimedia instructional materials? improved interactive multimedia materials promotes
7. What are the perceptions of the learner respondents and enhances effective teaching learning process in
on the use of the developed Interactive Multimedia Physics.
Materials?
Furthermore, Barredo (2015) in his study “Studying
the Impact of Using Multimedia Interactive Programs
Literature Review
on Children’s Ability to Learn Basic Skills in Science”
showed that there was an improvement in students’
Jamela (2011:67), as cited by Marces (2015) stated learning skills, which was not a proposal for the
that the low performance of students is attributed to replacement of traditional education. Rather,
the deficiency of textbook and instructional materials interactive-enhanced learning could provide a very
in teaching the subject. Thus, it is important for the useful alternative to traditional education, especially in
teacher to know how to develop interactive multimedia cases where it is not applicable to teach through
materials. The selection of the materials should be traditional methods.Lastly, Belen (2017) conducted a
based on the needs, interest, and capabilities of the study to find out the impact of using the computerized
students.In addition, Solar (2016) had argued that the program of a multimedia structure on students’
There were three research instruments used in the Selection of Topics in Chemistry 10 Suitable for
study to gather the needed data. The first was the Development of Interactive Multimedia Materials
evaluation instrument which was adopted from the
thesis of Castillejos (2018) which was also evaluated
that both experts and Science teachers agreed that the Table 10 shows that the computed t-value of 0.74 was
format of the developed IMM had a good presentation greater than the critical value of <.05 under the one
and well-organized delivery that invites the learners’ tailed test. Therefore, it failed to reject the null
curiosity and interest. hypothesis; hence there was no significant difference
in the evaluation of the two groups of respondents on
Table 8. Test of Significant Difference on Content the developed IMM in terms of Appropriateness and
Updatedness. It only means that both the experts and
the Science teachers agreed that the developed IMM
shows that the input materials in the IMM are up to
date and that they incorporate the latest information
and trends in learning. The level of difficulty of the
Table 8 shows that the computed t-value of 0.31 was activities presented in the developed IMM was also
greater than the critical value of <.05 under the one appropriate for the intended target learners.
tailed test. Therefore, it failed to reject the null
hypothesis; hence there was no significant difference Table 11. Test of Significant Difference on Technical
in the evaluation of the two groups of respondents on Aspect
the developed IMM in terms of Content. It only means
that both experts and Science teachers agreed that the
content of the developed IMM are well stated of what
are expected from the learners that help achieve its
purpose.
Table 11 shows that the computed t-value of 0 was
Table 9. Test of Significant Difference on Presentation
greater than the critical value of <.05 under the one
and Organization tailed test. Therefore, it failed to reject the null
hypothesis; hence there was no significant difference
in the evaluation of the two groups of respondents on
the developed IMM in terms of Technical Aspects.
This means that both experts and Science teachers
agreed that the developed IMM shows an interface of
Table 9 shows that the computed t-value of 0.66 was interactive learning and allows a multi-sensory
greater than the critical value of <.05 under the one learning to the learners.
tailed test. Therefore, it failed to reject the null
Level of Performance of Learner Respondents in
hypothesis; hence there was no significant difference
in the evaluation of the two groups of respondents on the Pretest and Posttest
the developed IMM in terms of Presentation and
Table 12. Level of Performance of the Learners’
Organization. It only means that both experts and
Science teachers agreed that the presentation and Respondents in the Pretest and Posttest of the
organization of the developed IMM has a sequence of Developed Interactive Multimedia Materials in
activities that leads the teachers and students a learning Chemistry 10
route that is at an appropriate level of difficulty,
engaging, and provides both motivating and useful
practices.
The comments of the experts and the teacher It implies that the developed Interactive Multimedia
Materials helps the learners come to a deeper
respondents to further improve the developed
understanding through new supplementary learning
Interactive Multimedia Materials in Chemistry 10
materials. It also shows that the learners were actively
included: (a) The program design is interactive; (b) I in the learning process while using the developed
enjoyed these computer-based learning materials like IMM. The video clips and the presentations in the
this one in future lessons; and (c) The content was IMM had helped them deepen their understanding and
clear and easy to understand. delivered more detailed information. The animation
and sounds also helped the learners to memorize
Meanwhile, their suggestions were: (a) Include the better.
curriculum guide in the IMM; (b) Simulations must be
added to the IMM; (c) Removes clutter and The learners also expressed that through the use of
distractions; (d) Change some of the graphics; (e) IMM, learning becomes easy and there will be no
Rephrase the questions; and (f) Font size and color and worries in terms of problem-solving with regard to Gas
style must be improved. Law. The developed Instructional Multimedia
Materials is very effective in the teaching-learning
process as perceived by the learners.
Perceptions of the Grade 10 students on the developed
IMM in Chemistry 10
Conclusion