Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microplastic Pollution in Deli River
Microplastic Pollution in Deli River
novridahasibuan@usu.ac.id
Abstract. Microplastic is new pollution and made from a synthetic polymer. The Deli River is
one of the main rivers in Medan city that flow on urban and suburban areas. This study has
aims to identify the characteristics (shape and type), the quantity, and the microplastic
correlation with the flow velocity. Sample collected at eight locations based on SNI 03-70160-
2004 and preparation in the laboratory with organic digestion and density separation. The
microplastic characterized identified with FTIR and microscopy, the quantity identified with
microscopy. Analyze the relation tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and significance tested
by Pearson Correlation at a 95% confidence level. The result showed that Deli River contains
polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene with film and fragment shape dominated. The
average microplastic quantity on Deli River Water is 102 particles L-1. The amount of
microplastic has a positive correlation with the flow velocity. Most of the microplastic on Deli
River Water in Medan came from secondary microplastic.
1. Introduction
Medan city produces 17,7% plastic waste from household waste, and 1,2% of total household recycled
it is [1,2]. Plastics are not recycled enter landfills and water bodies. The river is one of the water
bodies and the main pathway of plastics to oceans [3].
Deli River is one part of the Deli Sub-watershed, 47.748.01 Ha with a river length of 70 km
upstream of the river on Deli Serdang and Medan City as the downstream that used as the residential
area is 36,6% from total area [4,5].
Plastics are persistent and durable, but they can degradable caused by exposure to ultraviolet
radiation. Physical abrasion can break down plastic debris into smaller particles like micro to nano,
called microplastics [6]. Microplastics with unique sizes and stable properties are breeding for
microorganisms and pollutant carriers [7]. Plastics also contain toxic monomers and addictive
substances, which can dissolve into seawater and affect existing aquatic organisms [8]. There is no
standard method to identify microplastic. There are two types of the microplastic base on their
formation process, primary and secondary. Primary microplastics are plastics that have micro sizes
and are usually found in cleaners and cosmetic products. Secondary microplastics are formed from
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
plastics that already exist in the environment and are fragmented into smaller plastics into
microplastics [9].
This study analyzes the type, shape, quantity of microplastics, and the related quantity of
microplastic with flow velocity in the Deli River Medan. The ends of the Deli River flows to the
Belawan Sea, which is one of the seafood sources for the people of Medan City. The results of this
study are predicted microplastic pollution in Medan and encourage the integration of waste
management in Medan City.
2. Methodology
2
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
The particles shapes of microplastic on water and sediment in Deli Rives as follows:
3
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
Figure 2. Fragment (a), film (b), granule (c), fiber (d), foam (e) on water.
Some research shows that the origin and pathways of microplastics determine the shape of these
microplastics [7]. Microplastic contamination from anthropogenic sources such as household waste
contributed to the largest microplastics in the form of fragments [12]. The existing condition of Deli
River found that 36,6% of the watershed uses it as a residential area [5]. Fragments can come from
pieces of plastic waste that have been degraded to smaller fragments [13]. The film comes from the
degradation of plastic bags and plastic packaging [14]. Microplastics that float with irregular shapes
tend to be attracted to water bodies and get stuck in water bodies [15]. Therefore, particles with the
shape of films and fragments tend to be found in river water.
Fibers mainly come from clothing [16]. The form is widely used in packaging, apparel, automotive
components, and building utensil [17]. Granule form can come from microbeads such as body wash,
cosmetic facial scrubbers, detergents, or abrasion beads for industrial use [18]. Small granule shapes
may represent microplastics from primary sources as used in personal care products [8]. Secondary
microplastics such as films and fragments come from the weathering of plastic packaging or plastic
bags [19], and primary microplastic such as fiber and granule comes from sewage.
The combined test of microplastics from the eight sampling locations in water samples contain
polymer bonds of Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene. The results of the water sample peak
values were 2915 cm-1, 2847cm-1, 1462 cm-1, 1375 cm-1, 718 cm-1 and 666 cm-1. Polyethylene is
widely used in clothing, food containers, fishing nets, and mulch. Polypropylene is widely used in
household appliances, pipes, and packaging, while Polystyrene comes from foamed plastics such as
styrofoam [17].
4
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
However, there is still a lot of noise found in the reading results due to the presence of mixed
organic material and not destroyed during preparation, so that when filtering, the organic material is
attached to the microplastic. This is because the use of H2O2 10% solution is not optimal. Repeated
addition of H2O2 10% solution during preparation can overcome this [3].
Location
Figure 4. The quantity of microplastic at all locations.
The quantity of microplastic in several rivers showed that the amount of microplastic in Deli River
higher than Ciwalengke River in Majalaya, but microplastic in Deli River lower than Saigon River and
several rivers in South-Eastern Nigeria.
5
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
4 Conclusions
Microplastics found in water samples in Deli, Medan are Polypropylene, polyethylene, and
Polystyrene, which are often found in plastic bags. Microplastic shapes in water are dominated by
film, fragments, foam, and fiber sourced from secondary microplastics. The average of microplastics
abundance is 102 particles L-1 on water. The location after the tributary had a higher quantity of
microplastics compared to other places. The amount of microplastics has a low correlation with flow
velocity, several factors that had an impact are the presence of waste accumulation points, settlements,
and microplastics from tributaries [22].
Acknowledgment
This research was conducted by funding support from Research Institution at Universitas Sumatera
Utara under Research Implementation Contract TALENTA USU 2020 with Number
4142/UN5.1.R/PPM/2020 Date 27 April 2020.
6
International Conference on Research Collaboration of Environmental Science IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 802 (2021) 012019 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/802/1/012019
References
[1] Khair H, Siregar I Y, Rachman I and Matsumoto T 2019 Indonesia Journal Urban
Environmental. Technology 3 28
[2] Badan Pusat Statistik 2018 Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (Indonesia:Badan Pusat
Statistik Indonesia)
[3] Kataoka T, Nihei Y, Kudou K and Hinata H 2019 Environmental Pollution 244 958–65
[4] Zevri A 2019 J. Rekayasa Sipil 13 113–22
[5] Hutapea S 2012 Kajian Konversasi Daerah Aliran Sungai Deli Medan (Disertasi. Universitas
Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta
[6] Widianarko B and Hantoro I 2019 Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 36(5) 674-711
[7] Pan Z, et al. 2019 Science of the Total Environmental 650 1913–22
[8] Mohamed Nor N H and Obbard J P 2014 Marine Pollution Buletine 79 278–83
[9] Ramadan A H and Sembiring E 2020 E3S Web Conf 148 1-4
[10] Ebere E C, Wirnkor, V A, Ngozi, V E, and Chukwuemeka I S 2019 Environmental Health
Toxicology 34 4
[11] Kovač Viršek M, et al. 2016 Journal of Visualizad Experiments 118
[12] Ayuningtyas W C 2019 Journal Fisheries and Marine Research 3 41–5
[13] Tibbetts J, Krause S, Lynch I and Smith G H S2018 Water (Switzerland) 10
[14] Mauludy M S, Yunanto A & Yona D 2019 Jurnal Perikanan Universitas Gadjah Mada 21 73
[15] Horton A A and Dixon S J 2018 Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5 1268
[16] Li Y, Lu Z, Zheng H, Wang J and Chen 2020 Environmental Science Europe 32 15
[17] Yin L, et al. 2019 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16
[18] Nizzetto L, Bussi G, Futter M N, Butterfield D and Whitehead P G 2016 Environmental Science
Process Impacts 18 1050–59
[19] Fahrenfeld N L, Arbuckle-Keil G, Naderi Beni N and Bartelt-Hunt S L 2019 TrAC - Trends
Anaysis Chemistry 112 248–54
[20] Harpah N and Kamil I M 2017 Kajian kualitas air dan simulasi transpor kromium (Cr) di
perairan terbuka (Studi Kasus Air Sungai Deli). Thesis. Institute of Technology Bandung.
Bandung
[21] Alam F C, Sembiring E, Muntalif B S and Suendo V 2019 Chemosphere 224 637–45
[22] Harpah, N, Suryati I, Leonardo R, Ageng A R P and Addauwiyah R 2020 J. Sains dan Teknol.
20 108–15
[23] Rios Mendoza L M and Balcer M 2019 TrAC - Trends Analytical Chemistry 113 402–08
[24] Horton A A, Svendsen C, Williams R J, Spurgeon D J and Lahive E 2017 Marine Pollution
Bulletin 114 218–26