This rubric evaluates an oral report given by a construction engineering management group on their coursework. It assesses the content, organization, delivery, visual aids, preparedness, and referencing of the presentation across several criteria on a scale of 1 to 4. The student group scored full marks across each category, receiving a perfect rating of 50 points for their clear presentation of many good points with well-organized information, confident delivery with eye contact, appropriately supported visual aids, complete preparation to discuss the assigned topics, and proper referencing of sources.
This rubric evaluates an oral report given by a construction engineering management group on their coursework. It assesses the content, organization, delivery, visual aids, preparedness, and referencing of the presentation across several criteria on a scale of 1 to 4. The student group scored full marks across each category, receiving a perfect rating of 50 points for their clear presentation of many good points with well-organized information, confident delivery with eye contact, appropriately supported visual aids, complete preparation to discuss the assigned topics, and proper referencing of sources.
This rubric evaluates an oral report given by a construction engineering management group on their coursework. It assesses the content, organization, delivery, visual aids, preparedness, and referencing of the presentation across several criteria on a scale of 1 to 4. The student group scored full marks across each category, receiving a perfect rating of 50 points for their clear presentation of many good points with well-organized information, confident delivery with eye contact, appropriately supported visual aids, complete preparation to discuss the assigned topics, and proper referencing of sources.
Name of student for assessment & group: Construction Engineering Management
Leader: Dammang, Enwigne Julsali
Course and Year: BSCE 1A
CRITERIA Weight Not Satisfactory Developing Satisfactory Excellent Rating
1 2 3 4 Content 4 pts Points presented not Points presented was Many good points Enough points 16 clear; information does somewhat clear; too presented; just presented; not support ideas little information enough information information given presented was more than what was expected Organization 2 pts Information was very Information showed Information was Information was well 8 disorganized; Difficult little organization; organized, with organized, clear to understand audience take same occasional discussion of ideas effort to follow confusion between ideas Delivery 2 pts Presenter mumbles; Presenter was Presenter was Presenter was 8 voice can hardly be somewhat nervous; sometimes confident; voice was heard; no eye contact voice somewhat confident; voice can clearly heard; with with the audience audible; with minimal be heard; eye eye contact most of frequency of eye contact most of the the time with the contact with the time with the audience audience audience Visual Aids or 2 pts Visual aids were poorly Visual aids were Visual aids were Presentation was 8 PPT prepared; does not marginally prepared; well prepared; appropriately support the topic somewhat supports supports most of the supported with presented the topic presented topic presented varied sources Preparedness 2 pts Not prepared; reads the Somewhat prepared; Just enough Completely prepared; 8 entire report; does not sometimes read the preparation; discussed the topic discuss the topic; report; explained at discussed the assigned very well least two sub topics assigned topics well; most of the time References 0.5 pts The topics cited were Some of the topics Majority of the Majority of the topics 2 not properly referenced cited were properly topics cited were cited were properly referenced properly referenced referenced