Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 81

TART RECIPE UTILIZING CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var.

capitata)

JAM AS A FILLING INGREDIENTS

An Undergraduate Research

presented to

The College of Hospitality Management and Tourism

Cebu Technological University

Argao Campus

In Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Course

HPC 2210- Research in Hospitality

By:

Caminero, Monique Narca, Catherine

Davin, Stephen Nepangue, Vincent France

Gealon, Jeralyn Relatado, Princess Dhee

Glipa, June Rey Saberon, John Warren

Rabe, Mariztrelle

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

AY 2020-2021
ii

APPROVAL SHEET

This undergraduate research entitled “ TART RECIPE UTILIZING J(Brassica


oleracea var. capitata) JAM AS A FILLING INGREDIENTS “, presented and
submitted by Monique P. Caminero, Stephen Davin, Jeralyn Gealon, June Rey
Glipa, Mariztrelle Rabe, Catherine Narca, Vincent France Nepangue, Princess
Dhee Relatado, John Warren Saberon, in partial fulfillment of the Requirement of
the course, HPC 2210- Research in Hospitality, has been examined and is
recommended for the acceptance and approval for Oral Defense.
RESEARCH ADVISORY COMMITTEE

ANESITO L. CUTILLAS, Dev.Ed.D. PAUL VINCENT C.


DURAN, MBA-HRM
Dean of Instruction Dean, College of Hospitality Mgt
and Tourism

MARIE ROSE M. DERRAMAS, MBA, MSc-IHM REY ANTHONY A.


SARONA, DBA
Chair, HM Department Chair, Tourism Department

PANEL OF EXAMINERS
Approved by the committee on Oral Examination with a grade of ______.

REY ANTHONY A. SARONA, DBA


Chairman

MARIE ROSE M. DERRAMAS, MBA, MSc-IHM


Member

(Venus H. Baldea)
Adviser

Accepted and Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course
HPC 2210 – RESEARCH IN HOSPITALITY

Date of Design Hearing:


Date of Oral Defense:

EINGILBERT C. BENOLIRAO,
Dev.Ed.D.
Campus Director
iii

ABSTRACT

Title : TART RECIPE UTILIZING CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var.


capitata) JAM AS A FILLING INGREDIENTS

Researchers: CAMINERO, MONIQUE P.

DAVIN, STEPHEN L.

GEALON, JERRALYN R.

GLIPA, JUNE REY S.

NEPANGUE, VINCENT FRANCE B.

RABE, MARIZTRELLE C.

RELATADO, PRINCESS DHEE O.

SABERON, JOHN WARREN E.

NARCA, CATHERINE C.

Adviser: BALDEA, VENUS H.

Institution: CEBU TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY- ARGAO CAMPUS

Year Completed:

This study is a product development using cabbage as the main

ingredient. Employing both experimental and descriptive methods, treatment one

(T1) used 12 cup of cabbage filling, treatment two (T2) used 1 cup of cabbage

filling, treatment three (T3) used 1 12 cup of cabbage filling, and treatment four

(T4) used 2 cups of cabbage filling. The tarts were developed following the

specific recipe and sensory attributes as to flavor, aroma, texture, color, and
iv

general acceptability were identified based on tasters' responses. The descriptive

method was used in the sensory analysis of Cabbage Jam to determine the

acceptability of the product utilizing the 9-Point Hedonic Scale developed by

David R. Peryam, as cited by Gobetti (2011), rated by 27 random consumers,

and in the test of significant mean difference of the sensory analysis using the

One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).

Findings revealed that cabbage tart can be developed using different

concentrations of cabbage filling. Among the treatments, there is no significant

difference in all sensory analysis except aroma. To improve the aroma of

cabbage tart, adding aromatic extracts that could also enhance the color, taste,

and aroma of the filling, like lemon, is recommended. Cabbage could either be

mashed or blended. To explore its market potential, appropriate packaging

potential, and submission of the product to a shelf life and proximate analysis are

also recommended.

Program: Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Research Started:

Research Completed:
v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research would not have been possible without never-ending of


support many people who shared their expertise and who never ceased in
extending their helping hands in making this remarkable work of success.

To the panelists, Dr. Rey Anthony A. Sarona, Marie Rose M. Derramas, for
providing ample constructive comments and suggestions which direct to the
success of this work.

To Dr. Venus H. Baldea, for the brilliant ideas and advices for our research title
and accepting our request to be our research adviser.

To the respondents, the Second-year students of Bachelor of Science in


Hospitality Management (BSHM) who spared their time in answering the
questionnaires which made the researchers came up with a substantial results;

To Dr. Rey Anthony Sarona, for the brilliant ideas and patience to help us with
this research;

To the researcher’s classmates, co-researchers and schoolmates who extend


their assisting hands from the beginning until the end of this work; and

To Mariztrelle Rabe’s family who extend their assisting hands and letting us
made our cabbage tart for food tasting.

To John Warren’s family who offer their helping hands and for welcoming us in
their house to practice and prepare in making our food innovation research for
food tasting.

To Catherine Narca’s family who offer their helping hands and for welcoming us
in their house to continue making our Chapter 2 and 3 food innovation research.

Above all, to the Almighty Father for the strength, wisdom and good health which
allow the researchers to accomplish this piece of work. If not because of HIM,
this work turns to nothing.
vi

DEDICATION

This research study is heartily dedicated to

All the parent’s researchers who offered their endless support and

Guidance all throughout,

All our instructors for the encouragement and patience in mentoring us as

we pursue this study

The people who have been there to support, love, care, encourage

And inspire

Above all to the ALMIGHTY FATHER

For being the source of everything that made the researchers strong enough to

pursue this study and to aim success after all.


vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

TITLE PAGE
APPROVAL SHEET
ABSTRACT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
DEDICATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES

CHAPTER
1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE
INTRODUCTION 1
Rationale of the Study 1
Theoretical Background 5
THE PROBLEM 10
Statement of the Problem 10
Significance of the Study 11
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 12
Research Design 12
Research Environment 14
Research Respondents 16
Research Procedures 18
Data Gathering 19
viii

Treatment of Data 20

DEFINITION OF TERMS 21
2 DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS
Respondents profile in terms of age 23
Respondents profile in terms of gender 24
EVALUATIONS OF THE SENSORY ATTRIBUTES
OF CABBAGE IN TERMS OF FLAVOR, AROMA,
TEXTURE, COLOR, AND GENERAL ACCEPTABILITY
OF THE CABBAGE JAM IN VARIOUS
CONCENTRATIONS FILLING FOR TART IN
DIFFERENT TREATMENTS
Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 25

Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)


Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Flavor
Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 26
Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)
Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Aroma
Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 27

Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)


Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Texture
Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 28
Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)
Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Color
Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 29
Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)
Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of General
Acceptability
Over-All Sensory Evaluation of Cabbage 30
(Brassica Var. Capitata) Tart Using Different
Amounts of Cabbage Jam (T1-T4) As Evaluated
by The Panel of Tasters

TEST OF SIGNIFICANT MEAN DIFFERENCE OF THE


WEIGHTED MEAN OF TART RECIPE UTILIZING CABBAGE
JAM AS FILLING INGREDIENTS FROM T1-T4
ix

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 32


Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica
olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Flavor
Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 34
Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica
olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Aroma
Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 35
Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica
olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Texture
Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 37
Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica
olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Color
Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 38
Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica
olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of General
Acceptability
OUTPUT OF THE STUDY 40

3 SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION


Summary 41
Findings 41
Conclusion 43
Recommendation 43
REFERENCES 44
APPENDICES 47
A Transmittal Letter 48

B Research Instrument 50
C Sample Computation 52
D Documentation 53

CURRICULUM VITAE 56
x

LIST OF TABLES

Table Title Page

1 Distribution of Respondents 16
2 Ingredients Used 19
3 Respondent’s Profile in Terms of Age 37
4 Respondent’s Profile in Terms of Gender 38
5 Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 39
Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var. Capitata)
Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Flavor
6 Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 40
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var. capitata) Jam
as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Aroma
7 Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 42
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Jam
as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Texture
8 Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 43
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Jam
as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Color
9 Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing 44
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Jam
as a Filling Ingredients Terms of General Acceptability
10 Over-All Sensory Evaluation of Cabbage 45
(Brassica Var. Capitata) Tart Using
Different Amounts of Cabbage Jam (T1-T4)
As Evaluated by The Panel of Tasters
11 Test of Significant Mean Difference of the 47
Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing
Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam
xi

in Terms of Flavor
12 Test of Significant Mean Difference of the 48
Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing
Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam
in Terms of Aroma
13 Test of Significant Mean Difference of the 50
Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing
Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam
in Terms of Texture
14 Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted 51
Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing
Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam
in Terms of Color
15 Test of Significant Mean Difference 53
of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe Utilizing
Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam
in Terms of General Acceptability
xii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Title Page

1 Schema of the Theoretical Background 6

2 Flow of the Study 13


3 Location Map of the Research Environment 15
xiii
1

Chapter 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

INTRODUCTION

Rationale of the Study


Agriculture is undergoing a huge transformation. In the past, agriculture

was seen as a subsistence activity of farmers involving crop and livestock

production. For centuries agriculture was the same as farming, and most people

lived on farms or nearby and were largely self-sufficient. This is, however,

changing substantially in the recent years. Today, agriculture is rapidly turning

into a technology and market oriented “industry” which extends from agricultural

production, to sophisticated agriscience, and agribusiness. It now connects

strongly to the national and global economy. Many people who work in

agriculture actually do not work on farms but are engaged in businesses of seed,

fertilizer, agro-chemical, farm machinery, food-processing, marketing and trade.

Many are engaged in finance, research, distribution, and marketing activities

which provide services to the production agriculturalists. Agriculture has become

a big business. (Gandhi, 2014).

Product Innovation is all about of creating a new taste that can be loved

and appreciated by the target market or consumers that can be fit in their need

and wants. Now a days the consumers are being conscious of their health and

they want a nutritious and healthy product but in the same time can satisfy in

their cravings. Most people want a new taste, appearances and aroma that is
2

why they search for the new flavor, formulas and ingredients for the consumers

wants a new taste of food. (David, et. al. 2018)

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) is one of the most important

vegetables grown worldwide. It belongs to the family Cruciferae, which includes

broccoli, cauliflower, and kale. The different cultivated types of cabbage show

great variation in respect of size, shape and color of leaves as well as the texture

of the head (Singh et al., 2006). Approximately 6.3 kg of Brassica vegetables are

consumed per person annually (Jordbruksverket, 2003). Cabbage, as a highly

rated leafy vegetables and a marvelous food item, is grown for its enlarged,

edible, terminal buds; and is also preferably eaten almost everywhere in the

world (Tirasoglu et al., 2005). Cabbage is consumed either raw or processed in

different ways, e.g., boiled or, fermented or, used in salads. Due to its

antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties, cabbage has

widespread use in traditional medicine, in alleviation of symptoms associated

with gastrointestinal disorders (gastritis, peptic and duodenal ulcers, irritable

bowel syndrome) as well as in treatment of minor cuts and wounds and mastitis.

Fresh cabbage juice, prepared either separately or mixed with other vegetables

such as carrot and celery, is often included in many commercial weight-loss diets

(Samec, 2011), diets that improve the bioavailable content of nonheme iron

(Chiplonkar et al., 1999), as well as alternative therapies for cancer patients

(Maritess et al., 2005)

In 2020, the volume of cabbage produced in the Philippines was

approximately 129.8 thousand metric tons, reflecting a slight increase from the
3

previous year. This was equivalent to around 2.3 billion Philippine pesos in

production value (Statista Research Department, 2021). According to Nera

(2021), cabbage and other cruciferous vegetables are good sources of vitamins,

minerals, and other substances. Most importantly, they are packed with folate,

potassium, vitamin C, vitamin K, manganese, folate, calcium, carotenoids, and

flavonoids. Cabbage's fiber content is another one of its health advantages. Fiber

is necessary for a healthy digestive system and colon. Base on Philippine Dietary

Reference Intakes (PDRI) from the Department of Health (DOH), adults should

eat 20 to 25 grams of fiber per day. School-aged children and teenagers need

approximately 10 to 20 grams of fiber per day.

Cabbages produced in Mantalongon, Dalaguete, Cebu, were transported

to the Mantalongon Trading Centre and retailed at the Carbon market in Cebu

City. The traditional supply chain involved five players: farmers in Mantalongon

and nearby barangays; commission agents and wholesalers in the Mantalongon

Trading Centre; and wholesalers and retailers in the Carbon market. With the

abundance of rain and less heat this dry season in Mantalongon Dalaguete,

cabbages are easy to grow. As a result, there was an oversupply of cabbage in

the market (Skyscraper City-Cebu, 2021).

According to legend, the tart was invented by the unmarried French sisters

who ran the hotel in the 1880s, so in France, the actual name of the tart is "Tarte

des Demoiselles Tatin" (the tart of two unmarried women named Tatin.) It

actually didn't become famous until a Parisian restaurant called Maxim's put it on
4

the menu. Nowadays, though the apple tart is still the version served in France

(with tons of

caramel to hold it together). The tarte Tatin can be made with any fruit, but to be

strictly traditional, it must be served warm with cream on the side (Bundel, 2018)

Tart is a dessert with a crust on the bottom and sides that are shallow.

The crusts are produced using pastry dough (flour, sugar, unsalted butter, and

ice-cold water). The objective is to get a crust that is thick, solid, and crumbly.

The filling is spooned straight onto the crust, which is then baked to firm up

(TimesofIndia.com, 2021).

The researchers aim to introduce the innovated cabbage tart that contains

high levels of nutrition to different types of market critically assess the various

needs of customers because of its wholesome, fairly price, and nutritionally

innovated according to the aim of food industry.

The researchers will do everything to satisfy the consumer, but in the end

up the consumer satisfaction are always followed, because they are the

inspiration to innovate a product. Making product innovation is not only about the

safety and procedure but also the environment of the product and those who

produced it.

This innovated cabbage tart products can be a successful business of the

researchers once they will get the right target market, and the product does have

a unique healthy flavor that can roll out the same old tart also it offers good price

value so that the customers can easily afford the product, and lastly the factor

that can lead this product to success is the fearless but yet strategically planning.
5

To provide benefit to the bread and pastry- eating public, particularly to the

children, the researcher developed a tart with cabbage filling to provide more

nutritious, inexpensive and easy to prepare bake goodie utilizing the abundance

of chayote in the locality specifically in the well- known vegetable basket and

summer capital of southern Cebu, Mantalongon, Dalaguete.

Theoretical Background

This research is anchored in the theory of Diffusion of Innovation by

Rogers which emphasizes technology diffusion and adoption. It focuses on the

process of innovation by which new products are adopted (or not) by their

intended audiences. Rogers defines innovation as “the process by which an

innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the

members of a social system. The theory was developed by E.M. Rogers, a

communication theorist at the University of New Mexico, in 1962(Halton, 2021).

Additionally, it also stated that diffusion is a special type of communication in

which the messages is all about new ideas. The newness of the idea in the

message content gives diffusion its special character. Rogers (2003) described

the innovation-decision process as “an information-seeking and information-

processing activity, where an individual is motivated to reduce uncertainty about

the advantages and disadvantages of an innovation”. According to Sahin (2006),

adoption means making complete use of an innovation as the best course of

action available, “while rejection means, “not adopting an innovation.” Rogers

established four main components of innovation diffusion based on his concept

of diffusion; communication channel, innovation, time, and social system.


6

The first element of the diffusion of innovation process is the innovation.


Diffusion of Innovation Theory

(Rogers, 2003)

Consumer Act of the Philippines


and P.D. # 491 (Creation of
Nutrition Council)

T1 T2 T3 T4

1/2 cup 1 cup 1 1/2 cup 2 cups


cabbage cabbage cabbage cabbage
jam + jam + jam + jam +
Standard Standard Standard Standard
crust recipe crust recipe crust recipe crust recipe

SENSORY ANALYSIS (9 POINT HEDONIC SCALE) OF


CABBAGE JAM:

TART RECIPE UTILIZING


CABBAGE ( Brassica oleracea
var. capitata ) JAM AS A FILLING
INGREDIENTS

Fig 1. Schema of the Theoretical Background


7

Rogers (2003) defined the innovation as an idea, practice, or project that

is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption” (Rogers, 2003, p.

12). An innovation may have been invented a long time ago, but if individuals

perceive it as new, then it may still be an innovation for them. The newness

characteristic of an adoption is more related to the three steps (knowledge,

persuasion, and decision) of the innovation-decision process that will be

discussed later. In addition, Rogers claimed there is a lack of diffusion research

on technology clusters. For Rogers (2003), “a technology cluster consists of one

or more distinguishable elements of technology that are perceived as being

closely interrelated”.

The second element of the diffusion of innovations process is

communication channels. For Rogers (2003), communication is “a process in

which participants create and share information with one another in order to

reach a mutual understanding”. This communication occurs through channels

between sources. Rogers states that “a source is an individual or an institution

that originates a message. A channel is the means by which a message gets

from the source to the receiver”. Rogers states that diffusion is a specific kind of

communication and includes these communication elements: an innovation, two

individuals or other units of adoption, and a communication channel.

According to Rogers (2003), the time aspect is ignored in most behavioral

research. He argues that including the time dimension in diffusion research

illustrates one of its strengths. The innovation-diffusion process, adopter


8

categorization, and rate of adoptions all include a time dimension. These aspects

of Rogers’ theory will be discussed later in more detail.

The social system is the last element in the diffusion process. Rogers

(2003) defined the social system as “a set of interrelated units engaged in joint

problem solving to accomplish a common goal”. Since diffusion of innovations

takes place in the social system, it is influenced by the social structure of the

social system. For Rogers (2003), structure is “the patterned arrangements of the

units in a system”. He further claimed that the nature of the social system affects

individuals’ innovativeness, which is the main criterion for categorizing adopters.

The end result of this diffusion is that people, as part of a social system, adopt a

new idea, behavior, or product.

The study is enhanced by The Philippine Constitution under Article II

Section 15, the state shall protect and promote the right to health of the people

and instill health consciousness among them. Therefore, the state recognizes

that nutritional deficiency problems in the Philippines, based on nutrition surveys,

include deficiency in Vitamin A, energy, iron, riboflavinandiodine, and thiamine.

To a minor extent, the Filipino diet is also a deficient in folate, calcium and

ascorbic.

The World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization,

among many other nationally recognized organizations have noted that there are

over 2 billion people worldwide who suffer from a variety of micronutrient

deficiencies. Almost 160 countries pledge at the FAO/WHO International

Conference on Nutrition to make efforts to help combat these issues of


9

micronutrient deficiencies, highlighting the important aspect of decreasing the

number of those who with Vitamin A, iodine, and iron deficiencies, highlighting

the important aspect of decreasing the number of those with Vitamin A, iodine,

and iron deficiencies.

The Consumer Act of the Philippines is the policy of the State to protect

the interest of the consumer, promote his general welfare and to establish

standards of conduct for business and industry. The Law was enacted to protect

the interests of consumers through the promotion of public health and safety

measures, and the prevention of deceptive and unfair acts of unscrupulous

businessmen.

Presidential Decree 491 of 1974 or the Nutrition Act of the Philippines

created the National Nutrition Council (NNC) to supervise, coordinate and

evaluate the implementation of the national nutrition program which shall be

implemented by all agencies and instrumentalities of both the government and

the private sector concerned with improving the nutrition of our people. The NNC

shall coordinate and integrate policies and programs of all agencies and

instrumentalities of the government charged with the prosecution of existing law,

policies, rules and regulations concerning nutrition.

The Philippine was known for its abundance in cabbage, which can be

found in any region. Just like the other fruits and vegetable Cabbage itself has its

seasonal bearing of when and what month is the most abundant harvesting time.

Cabbage is a cool-season vegetable suited to both spring and fall.


10

The vegetable basket of Cebu, Mantalongon, Dalaguete is one of the

major agricultural centers in the Province of Cebu. It has 16 mountain barangays

that are prime producers of high value crops and vegetable wherein large

plantations and plenty of harvest in a year for a cabbage. Due to its abundance in

the supply of cabbage the benefits they can get are not highly given attention.

THE PROBLEM

Statement of the Problem

This study looked into the general viability of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea

var. capitata) jam as a filling ingredient of the tart which was conducted at Cebu

Technological University-Argao Campus during the academic year 2021-2022 as

basis for a recipe guide.

Specifically, the study sought to answer the following sub-problems:

1. What are the formulations of cabbage tart from T1 to T4?

2. What are the sensory attributes of cabbage tart from T1 to T4:

2.1 color;

2.2 texture;

2.3 aroma

2.4 flavor; and,

2.5 general acceptability?

3 Is there a significant difference among treatments in terms of the sensory

attributes considered?

4 Based on the findings, what cabbage tart can be formulated?

Statement of Null Hypothesis


11

Ho: There was no significant difference among the treatments in terms of

the attributes considered.

Significance of the Study

The findings of the study are beneficial to the following entities:

The Students. This study is a great help to students especially those who

take the course Hospitality Management and at the end of the study, they are

able to know about the benefits of CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)

and the various products that makes out of it especially Cabbage Jam.

Entrepreneurs. This provides the entrepreneurs new product to sell in the

community.

Farmers. To provide them information about Cabbage ( Brassica oleracea

var. capitata) that encourages them to till and produce more harvest from the

plant and to maximize its fresh produce. This provides them the farmers new

idea in utilizing cabbage.

Community. This study provides new image of Tart recipe utilizing

cabbage jam as a filling ingredient which has several health benefits that are

essential in achieving a healthy living and for that health conscious.


12

Future Researchers. The data gathers provide the future researchers

with basis for improving their own studies or in testing the validity of others

related findings. This study also serves as their cross-reference that gives them a

background or an overview of making cabbage jam as a filling in cabbage tart.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design

This research combined experimental and descriptive research

methodologies that determined the sensory analysis of cabbage jam filling from

T1 to T4 in terms of taste, color, texture, aroma, flavor, and general acceptability.

With the assistance of the selected panel of tasters, who were second-year

hospitality management students with an understanding of and familiarity with

food and food preparation. When tasting the different treatments with the 9-Point

Hedonic Scale, observations were made for probable changes in taste, texture,

aroma, and flavor. The instrument aided in determining the attributes of cabbage

tarts treated with different amounts of cabbage. The descriptive approach was

used to interpret the study's data and findings, which included sensory analysis

and overall acceptability. The result was the basis of a cabbage jam.

Flow of the Study

The research flow uses the System Model that consist of three phases as

follows: Inputs, Process and Output.


13

Figure 2 displays the flow of the study. The first phase is the input where

the attributes of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Jam filling treats with

different measurements of the jam ingredients. The treatment one (T1) uses ½

cup of cabbage jam filling, treatment two (T2) uses 1 cup of cabbage jam filling,

treatment three (T3) uses 1 ½ cups of cabbage filling and treatment four (T4)

uses 2 cups cabbage jam filling. The second phase is the process in which it is

the evaluation of the different treatments, the sensory quality of the cabbage jam

using the different measurements of cabbage jam filling in terms of taste, texture,

aroma, flavor and its general acceptability. The last phase is the output/result and

the findings of the experiment serves as basis for the recommendation of a

Cabbage jam recipe.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

Evaluation of the respondents in the


sensory attributes of the Cabbage
CABBAGE TART Tart from T1-T4 treated with the
different measurements of cabbage
 T1 (1/2 cup filling in terms of: TART RECIPE
cabbage jam + Taste, color; texture; aroma, flavor; UTILIZING
Standard crust and, general acceptability. CABBAGE
recipe) 1. Experimental and Descriptive (Brassica
 T2 (1 cup method: oleracea var.
cabbage jam + 1. Gathering of capitata) JAM
Standard crust materials to test
AS A FILLING
2. Obtaining the
recipe) INGREDIENTS
instrument to use:
 T3 (1 1/2 cup the 9 Point
cabbage jam Hedonic scale
+Standard crust 3. Conducting the
recipe) Sensory Analysis
 T4 (2 cups 4. Collation of data
cabbage jam + 5. Statistical
Treatment
Standard crust 6. Analysis,
recipe) Interpretation
And
Recommendations
14

Fig 2. Flow of the Study

Environment

The municipality of Argao is 66.90 kilometers southeast of Cebu Province.

It is bounded in the north by the municipality of Sibonga, in the south, by the

Municipality of Dalaguete, by the Bohol Straight in the east and in the west by

Municipalities of Dumanjug, Ronda, Alcantara, Moalboal, and Badian. The

municipality has 18 kilometers shoreline which stretches from the boundary of

Sibonga to the boundary of Dalaguete and an average depth of 29 kilometers

from the coast to the interior along the boundaries on the western portion of the

municipality.

The municipality occupies a total land area of approximately 20,753

hectares. Of the total land area 13606 hectares are classified as the alienable

and disposable lands while 5350 hectares are timber/forest land.

Argao as a town is composed of 45 barangays is created under

commonwealth act of 1935 and republic act of 1950 s and 1960s. One of its

barangays is barangay Lamacan where Cebu technological university Argao

campus strategically located.

The study was conducted in Cebu Technological University, Argao

Campus, formerly Cebu State College of Science and Technology-Agro Industrial

and Forestry College. The university is situated at Ed Kintanar Street, Lamacan,


15

Argao Cebu. This is located in the southern part of Cebu which is approximately

66 kilometers away from Cebu.


Cebu Technological
University-

Argao Campus

Fig 3. Location Map of the Research Environment


16

Respondents

There were 27 respondents of the study who were randomly

selected and it composed of second-year Hospitality Management students.

Eight respondents from section A, nine respondents from section B, and ten

respondents from section C. They were selected accordingly by considering their

exposure and experience in relation to food technology. The orientation of the

evaluation process conducted prior to the actual testing of the product. The

respondents were informed on the importance of their participation and

commitment to ensure reliable results of the evaluation of the product. Below is

the break down in the distribution of respondents.

Table 1

Distribution of respondents

NO. OF TASTERS

Group Male Female Total %

Respondents 2A 4 4 8 29.63

2B 4 5 9 33.33

2C 5 5 10 37.04

TOTAL 13 14 27 100

Instrument

To gather the necessary data, an adopted Sensory Analysis

Instrument was utilized which the respondents used in order to rate the sensory

qualities of the products evaluated according to taste, color; texture; aroma,

flavor; and, general acceptability with the assigned weight of 9 as the highest and
17

1 as the lowest and a parametric scale of 5 interval between range and

qualitative descriptions of Like Extremely as the highest and Dislike Extremely as

the lowest. The instrument used is the 9-point Hedonic Scale which appears

below.

Assigned Weight Parametric Scale Qualitative Description

9 8.50- 9.00 Like extremely

8 7.50-8.49 Like very much

7 6.50-7.49 Like much

6 5.50-6.49 Like moderately

5 4.50-5.49 Like slightly

4 3.50-4.49 Neither like or dislike

3 2.50-3.49 Dislike slightly

2 1.50-2.49 Dislike very much

1 1.00-1.49 Dislike extremely

Table 2 shows the ingredients of making Tart and its quantity to give the

readers information of the recipe. The researcher used the standard crust recipe

plus different measurements of fillings: ( T1) used 1/2 cup cabbage jam filling,

treatment two (T2) used 1 cup cabbage jam filling, treatment three (T3) used 1 1/2

cup cabbage jam (T4) used 1/2 cup cabbage jam filling. Preparation in making tart

is as follow.
18

Preparation

Dough preparation

1. To make the crust, sift together the flour and salt in a large bowl.

Using a pastry blender or two knives cut the butter or shortening

into the flour and kill mixture resembles coarse breadcrumbs.

2. Sprinkle cold water gradually over the mixture gathering the cramps

together until they form a ball. Sprinkle flower and waxed paper

unwrapped the gathered ball in the paper. Chill in the refrigerator

for 30 minutes.

Cabbage Jam Preparation

1. Cut the cabbage into strips or mash very finely the measure out 400

grams (2 cups) of vegetable.

2. Combine cabbage flesh/pulp and sugar and its juice out from matching in

a medium saucepan. Bring to a boil and simmer over medium heat,

stirring constantly until mixture of s and has the consistency of spreadable

jam.

3. Remove from heat. Set aside to cool, then transferred to a clean

container with cover. Cabbage on can be stored in refrigerator for up to

one week.

4. Serve as a spread for bread or crackers.

Table 2 is constructed below to show the ingredients and their

corresponding measurements from t1 to t4 of the cabbage towards submitted


19

for sensory evaluation to determine the attributes to taste, color; texture;

aroma, flavor; and, general acceptability.

Table 2

Ingredients Used

T1 T2 T3 T4

Ingredients Quantity Ingredients Quantity Ingredients Quantity Ingredients Quantity

Flour 1¼ Flour 1¼ Flour 1¼ Flour 1¼


cup cup cup cup
Chilled ¼ cup Salt ¼ cup Salt ¼ cup Salt ¼ cup

butter

Salt 1T Chilled 1T Chilled 1T Chilled 1T


butter butter butter
Chilled Chilled Chilled Chilled
solid solid solid solid
vegetable 2T vegetable 2T vegetable 2T vegetable 2T
shortenin shortening shortenin shortening
g g
Iced 3-4 T Iced 3-4 T Iced 3-4 T Iced 3-4 T
water water water water
Cabbage ½ cup Cabbage 1 cup Cabbage 1½ Cabbage 2
Jam Jam Jam cup Jam cups

Data Gathering Procedures

A letter request for approval was sent to the Campus Director of Cebu

Technological University- Argao Campus that allowed the researchers to conduct

the study. The researchers were sought an approval, then the information was

sent to the adviser of the second-year students of the BSHM of CTU-Argao


20

Campus who were randomly selected from their groups became the respondents

of the study. Then the conduct of the study was followed.

The preparation in making the Cabbage Jam was done. There were four

treatments to be prepared. Each treatment was prepared with proper food

hygiene and food safety to ensure safe food to produce. Products in each

treatment was wrapped with a designated color to be properly identified by

the tasters. They were oriented before the evaluation was take place. A glass

of water was provided in each taster. The researchers personally assisted the

tasters during the evaluation for them to be guided in assessing to the color;

texture; aroma, flavor; and, general acceptability of Cabbage jam. Then the

filling of the crust in the tarts following the specific measurements of the

specific treatment from T1- T2: ¼ part of cabbage jam filling for the first

treatment, the use of ½ cabbage jam filling, fourth is the use of ¾ part of

cabbage jam filling, and lastly , the use of 100% cabbage jam filling. All

treatments were prepared and baked in the same process.

Treatment of Data

Frequency and Percentage. The statistics was used in describing the profile

of the respondents.

Weighted Mean. The statistical treatment was used to determine the different

levels of responses.

The researchers utilized the 9-point hedonic scale wherein the sponsors of

the consumer panelist had corresponding weights.


21

ANOVA (One factor Analysis). This determined whether there existed

significant difference among the means of the different treatments identified.

This was used to determine the level of effectiveness and acceptance of

cabbage job as an innovative recipe for tart filling.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

The following terms used in the study are operationally defined as follows

Cabbage is a several cultivars of Brassica oleracea, is a leafy green, red, or

white biennial plant grown as an annual vegetable crop for its dense-leaved

heads.

General acceptability is the condition wherein the respondents like or dislike

the product of this study.

Jam is a product made of whole fruit cut into pieces or trust then heated with

water and sugar to activate its pectin before being put into containers.

Sensory analysis is a multidisciplinary science that uses human panelist and

their senses of sight smell taste touch and hearing which measures the

sensory and acceptability of foods.

Tart A pastry shell with shallow sides no top crust and any of various fillings.
22

Chapter 2

DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

This chapter covers the presentation, analysis, and interpretation of data

gathered. All the information is based on the responses made by the consumer

panelists through the use of the 9-Point Hedonic Scale. All the data gathered

undergoes tabulation, submission to statistical procedure, analysis, and

interpretation to arrive at valuable generalizations. This chapter has three parts:

Part I presents the profile of the respondents in terms of their age and gender.

Part II presents the Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica

oleracea var. capitata) Jam as a filling ingredient using the four treatments on

color, aroma, flavor, texture, and general acceptability.

T1- ½ cup Cabbage

T2- 1 cup Cabbage

T3- 1 ½ cup Cabbage

T4- 2 cups Cabbage


23

Part III shows the test significant mean difference using the different treatments

reflective of the different processes made with the Cabbage Jam.

Part IV formulates the possible recipe guide from the results of the data gathered

from this study with the intent of the Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica

oleracea var. capitata) Jam Ingredients, recipe adoption.

PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Age

Age as an important variable in the study constitute to the shape of shared


experiences, cultures, values, by a group of individuals which the respondents of
the Study present. Table 3 presents the respondent’s profile in terms of their
Age.
Table 3

Respondent’s Profile in Terms of Age


Age F %

21 years old and 13 48.15

above

20 years old 12 44.44

19 years old 2 7.41

TOTAL 27 100.00

Average age: 20.41


24

As shown in table 3, the maximum bracket of the respondents is under the

category of 21 years old and above, and the minimum age of the respondents is

under 19 years old. There are 13 respondents, or 48.15% of the total

respondents, who belong to the highest age bracket, which is 21 years old and

above. There are 12, or 44.44%, of the total respondents under the age of 20

years old, and the other 7.41% of the total respondents, or 2 respondents, belong

to the lowest age bracket, which is 19 years old. Moreover, the average age of

the respondents is 20.41. It is evident that the majority the respondents are in the

appropriate age for college students which is 21 years old and above, thus

belonging to the adult category supported by the sequence of developmental

shifts (A. Rae Simpson, 2018).

Gender

Gender roles determines the social norm which greatly affects choice which is

relevant to the study. Table 3 presents the respondent’s profile in terms of

gender.

Table 4

Respondent’s Profile in Terms of Gender


Gender F %

Male 14 51. 85

Female 13 48.15

TOTAL 27 100.00
25

Table 4 shows that males make up the majority of responses. Males make

up 14 respondents (51.85 percent), while females make up 13 respondents

(48.15 percent). Furthermore, there are 27 total respondents across both

genders.

EVALUATIONS OF THE SENSORY ATTRIBUTES OF CABBAGE IN TERMS

OF FLAVOR, AROMA, TEXTURE, COLOR, AND GENERAL ACCEPTABILITY

OF THE CABBAGE JAM IN VARIOUS CONCENTRATION AS FILLING

FOR TART IN DIFFERENT TREATMENTS

This section reveals the evaluation of the respondents in terms of the

various concentrations of cabbage jam in the Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var.

capitata) Tart according to its flavor, aroma, texture, color, and general

acceptability.

Table 5

Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica Oleracea Var.


Capitata) Jam as A Filling Ingredient in Terms of Flavor
Treatment Weighted Mean Quantitative Description

T1 7.74 Like very much

T2 7.81 Like very much

T3 7.63 Like very much

T4 7.59 Like very much

Legend:

8.50-9.00 Like extremely


26

7.50-8.49 Like very much


6.50-7. 49 Like much
5. 50-6.49 Like moderately
4.50-5.49 Like slightly
3.50-4. 49 Neither like or dislike
2.50-3. 49 Dislike slightly
1.50-2. 49 Dislike very much
1.00-1. 49 Dislike extremely

The treatment (T1) receives a weighted mean of 7.74, which indicates that

it is Like very much. The treatment (T2) achieves a weighted mean of 7.81, which

is Like very much. The treatment (T3) receives a weighted mean of 7.63, which

indicates that it is Like very much. The treatment (T4) has a weighted mean of

7.59, which is Like very much. T2 gets the highest flavor rating of the treatments.

According to Flood (2016), the primary function of flavor is to add taste to

foods, as they have no nutritional properties. This is supported by the chemistry

industry (2009), explicating that the flavor plays an important role in the

consumption and acceptance of food and in the quality of life in general.

Hence, the importance of flavor in food with regard to its palatability is

well known, but its value to digestion and metabolism must not be overlooked.

The flavor and taste of food stimulation salivary flow and acid digestion

(Chemistry industry, 2009).

Table 6

Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica oleracea Var.


capitata) Jam as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Aroma
Treatment Weighted Mean Quantitative Description

T1 8.30 Like very much


27

T2 8.00 Like very much

T3 7.37 Like much

T4 7.63 Like very much

The treatment (T1) gets a weighted mean of 8.30, or like very much. The

treatment (T2) receives a weighted mean of 8.00, or like very much. The

treatment (T3) achieves a weighted mean of 7.37, which is similar to a lot. The

treatment (T4) obtains a weighted mean of 7.63, or like very much. In terms of

aroma, this means T1 has the greatest rating among the treatments. People

have various sensitivities in terms of odor depending on their state of starvation,

disposition, gender, ability, and also their health capabilities.

It is proved by the study of Keeffe (2019), that aromas play a central role

in our perception of food. If you pinch your nostrils when you eat, you’ll rarely

taste anything. That fact is why food scientist use chemical aromatics, essential

oils, botanical extracts to enhance the flavor of foods and beverages.

Therefore, this finding suggests that perception of a food is influenced by

its familiarity and retronasal aroma. These results suggest when a food is

unfamiliar, the noticeability and intensity of a particular taste quality are not

match altered by the retronasal aroma, but when a food is highly familiar,

retronasal aroma serves to decouple noticeability and intensity of a given taste

quality. Danguin (2009) said that, “we have come to believe that aromas can help
28

compensate for the reduction of fat, sugar, and salt in healthful foods, and make

them more appealing.

Table 7

Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var.


capitata) Jam as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Texture
Treatment Weighted Mean Quantitative Description

T1 7.81 Like very much

T2 8.00 Like very much

T3 7.63 Like very much

T4 7.78 Like very much

The treatment (T1) gets a weighted mean of 7.81, or like very much. The

treatment (T2) receives a weighted mean of 8.00, or like very much. The

treatment (T3) obtains a weighted mean of 7.63 or like very much. The treatment

(T4) has a weighted mean of 7.78, which means like very much. In terms of

texture, this means T2 has the greatest rating among the treatments.

According to Szczesniak (2007), texture affects consumer attitudes to and

preference for specific foods, often being equal to flavor in importance. It must be

recognizing the texture is the multi parameter attribute. Definitions and

connotations of specific textural characteristics are reviewed as well as their

classification.

In conclusion, Kilcast (2004), texture is one of the most important

attributes used by the consumers to assess food quality. Consumers experience


29

texture when they eat, and how they perceived and describe key textural

qualities such as crispness.

Table 8

Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var.


capitata) Jam as a Filling Ingredients Terms of Color
Treatment Weighted Mean Quantitative Description

T1 8.00 Like very much

T2 7.78 Like very much

T3 7.67 Like very much

T4 7.59 Like very much

The treatment (T1) obtains the weighted mean of 8.00 or Like very much.

The treatment (T2) obtains the weighted mean of 7.78 or Like very much. The

treatment (T3) obtains the weighted mean of 7.67 or Like very much. The

treatment (T4) obtains the weighted mean 7.59 or Like very much. In terms of

color, this means T1 has the greatest rating among the treatments.

This is supported by Narich creative innovation (2019), that color is

potentially the most important sensory property in the food and beverages

industry. Food color gives consumers an almost immediate impression about the

freshness, flavor and quality of a product. This affects a consumer’s decisions to

purchase that product or select something that looks more appealing.

Therefore, color is the single most important product-intrinsic sensory cue

when it comes to setting peoples expectations regarding the likely taste and

flavor of food and drink (Spence, 2015).


30

Table 9

Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var.


capitata) Jam as a Filling Ingredients Terms of General Acceptability
Treatment Weighted Mean Quantitative Description

T1 7.78 Like very much

T2 7.93 Like very much

T3 7.59 Like very much

T4 7.96 Like very much

The treatment (T1) receives a weighted mean of 7.78 or Like very much.

The treatment (T2) obtains the weighted mean of 7.93 or Like very much. The

treatment (T3) gets the weighted mean of 7.59 or Like very much. The treatment

(T4) has the weighted mean 7.96 or Like very much. In terms of general

acceptability, this means T4 has the greatest rating among the treatments.

This is supported with the study of Sharif et.al (2007) cited in Handbook of

food and science technology (2017), entitled “Sensory evaluation and consumer

acceptability” explains that the successful evaluation in food industries is

achieved by linking sensory properties to physical, chemical, formulations and

process variables which enables food manufacturing products with maximum

consumer acceptance.

Hence, the sensory attributes of foods are widely considered to be an

important determinant, of acceptability. Other factors that determine whether a


31

food will be acceptable to an individual include physiological state of the

individual and the social, institutional and motivational context of eating, serving,

cooking or purchase (Booth, 1981).

Table 10

Over-All Sensory Evaluation of Cabbage (Brassica Var. Capitata) Tart Using


Different Amounts of Cabbage Jam (T1-T4) As Evaluated by The Panel of
Tasters
This part reveals the over-all evaluation of cabbage (Brassica var. capitata) Tart

using different amounts of cabbage jam filling as evaluated by the tasters.

Over-All

Weighted
Flavor Aroma Texture Color General
Mean
Treatmen Acceptabilit

t y

WM QD WM QD WM QD WM QD WM QD WM QD

T1 7.7 LV 8.3 LE 7.8 LV 8.0 LV 7.78 LVM 7.9 LV

4 M 0 1 M 0 M 2 M

T2 7.8 LV 8.0 LV 8.0 LV 7.7 LV 7.93 LVM 7.9 LV

1 M 0 M 0 M 8 M 0 M

T3 7.6 LV 7.3 LV 7.6 LV 7.6 LV 7.59 LVM 7.5 LV

3 M 7 M 3 M 7 M 8 M

T4 7.5 LV 7.6 LV 7.7 LV 7.5 LV 7.96 LVM 7.7 LV

9 M 3 M 8 M 9 M 1 M
32

Legend: WM- Weighted Mean QD- Qualitative Description

LE- Like Extremely LVM- Like Very Much

The Table 10 shows that the treatment 1 (T1) obtains the overall weighted

mean of 7. 92 or Like Very Much; the Treatment 2 (T2) obtains its overall

weighted mean of 7.90 or Like Very Much; the Treatment 3 (T3) obtains its

overall weighted mean of 7.58 or Like Very Much; and the Treatment 4 (T4) as

well obtains its overall weighted mean of 7.71 or Like Very Much.

The result implies that the sensory qualities such as flavor, aroma,

texture, and color are strong determinants of alimentary behavior. These food

properties not only play a role in determining, but also in choosing foods during a

meal, ingestion, and degree of satisfaction, moreover timely, successful

development and launch of new products depend on the manner in which

decisions are reached a new product strategy are formulated (Singh-Ackbarali,

D., 2014).

In this case, all the four treatments: T1-T4 are much like in terms of

sensory attributes considered and are generally acceptable according to the

obtained rating of Like Very Much as evaluated of the panel of tasters.

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam as filling
ingredients from T1-T4

The portion reveals the test of significant mean difference of the

weighted mean of the sensory analysis of the Tart Recipe Utilizing

Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam as filling ingredients.


33

Table 11

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Flavor

This portion reveals the test result of the test of significant mean difference of the

Cabbage Tart from T1-T4 in terms of flavor.

Sensory Formulation Mean Computed Critical P Decision Interpretation

Qualities F-value F-value


Value

T1 7.74

T2 7.81

Flavor T3 7.63 0.23 2.69 0.88 Accept Not

Ho Significant
T4 7.59

Table 11 unveils the difference among the four (4) treatments (T 1-T4) of in

terms of flavor. As to the difference in aroma between the four (4) treatments

(T1-T4), the p value obtains 0.88 which is greater than the alpha (a) at 0.05 that

leads to the decision of accepting the null hypothesis. Thus, there is no

significant difference in the weighted means among the four treatments (4)

treatments (T1-T4) in terms of flavor. To determine that there is no significant

difference among the four (4) treatments, different formulations or treatments are

subjected to F-test. The Fisher-test results reveal that, though the weighted

means are different, there is no significant difference between all the treatments
34

involves in considering that all the p-values are greater than 0.05 level of

significance. All treatments differ in terms of flavor.

Considering the mean values shown above, the treatment (T 2) gets the

highest weighted mean of 7.81 or Like Very Much which means that the

Cabbage Jam with the presence of cabbage (1 cup of Cabbage) is in favor in

terms of aroma among all the other formulations. According to Szczesniak, A.S.

et. al (1992), the flavor profile method is based on the concept that flavor

consists of identifiable taste, odor, and chemical feeling factors plus an

underlying complex of sensory impressions not separately identifiable. The

method consists of formal procedures for describing an assessing the aroma and

flavor of a product in a reproducible manner. The separate characteristics

contributing to the overall sensory impression of the product are identified, and

their intensity assessed in order to build a description of aroma, flavor and

aftertaste of the product.

Thus, flavors are the sensory impressions you experience when

consuming foods and beverages. These impressions are formed by the chemical

sensations of taste and smell. Along with other sensations, like texture, you get

the full experience of a food product (Anderson et.al,2019).

Table 12

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Aroma

This portion reveals the test result of the test of significant mean difference of the

Cabbage Tart from T1-T4 in terms of aroma.


35

Sensory Computed Critical P


Qualities Formulation Mean F-value F-value Value Decision Interpretation
T1 8.30
T2 8.00 3.69 2.69 0.01 Reject Ho Significant
Aroma
T3 7.37
T4 7.63

Table 12 unveils the difference among the four (4) treatments (T 1-T4) of in

terms of aroma. As to the difference in aroma between the four (4) treatments

(T1-T4), the p value has obtained 0.01 which is lesser than the alpha (a) at 0.05

that leads to the decision of rejecting the null hypothesis. Thus, there is a

significant difference in the weighted means among the four treatments (4)

treatments (T1-T4) in terms of aroma. To determine that there is no significant

difference among the four (4) treatments, different formulations or treatments are

subjected to F-test. The Fisher-test results reveal that, though the weighted

means are different, there is no significant difference between all the treatments

involved considering that all the p-values are greater than 0.05 level of

significance. All treatments differ in terms of aroma.

Considering the mean values shown above, the treatment (T 1) gets the

highest weighted mean of 8. 30 or Like Very Much which means that the

Cabbage Jam with the presence of cabbage (1/2 cup of Cabbage) is in favor in

terms of aroma among all the other formulations. According to Anthony (2007),

aroma is the first cousin of taste. In fact, much of what we call taste is an

intricately entwined matrix of flavor, aroma chemicals and texture or mouthfeel.

Hence, Aromas play a central role in our perception of food. If you pinch

your nostrils when you eat, you’ll rarely taste anything. That fact is why food
36

scientists use chemical aromatics, essential oils, and botanical extracts to

enhance the flavor of food and beverages (Keeffe, 2019).

Table 13

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Texture

This portion reveals the test result of the test of significant mean difference of the

Cabbage Tart from T1-T4 in terms of texture.

Sensory Formulation Mean Computed Critical P Decision Interpretation

Qualities F-value F-value


Value

T1 7.81

T2 8.00

Texture 0.72 2.69 0.54 Accept Not


T3 7.63
Ho Significant

T4 7.78

Table 13 unveils the difference among the four (4) treatments (T 1-T4) of in

terms of texture. As to the difference in aroma between the four (4) treatments

(T1-T4), the p value has obtained 0.54 which is lesser than the alpha (a) at 0.05

that leads to the decision of accepting the null hypothesis. Thus, there is no

significant difference in the weighted means among the four treatments (4)

treatments (T1-T4) in terms of texture. To determine that there is no significant

difference among the four (4) treatments, different formulations or treatments are

subjected to F-test. The Fisher-test results reveal that, though the weighted
37

means are different, there is no significant difference between all the treatments

involved considering that all the p-values are greater than 0.05 level of

significance. All treatments differ in terms of texture.

Considering the mean values shown above, the treatment (T 2) gets the

highest weighted mean of 8.00 or Like Very Much which means that the

Cabbage Jam with the presence of cabbage (1 cup of Cabbage) is in favor in

terms of aroma among all the other formulations. Texture produces the most

complex sensory experience. A very significant portion of food texture perception

is derived from sensations originating in the oral cavity (Christensen, 1994).

Thus, according to Kilcast D. et. al,(1990), in his paper "Structure and

texture their importance in food quality". Texture is important in determining the

eating quality of foods and can have a strong influence on food intake and

nutrition. Perceived texture is closely related to the structure and composition of

the food, and both microscopic and macroscopic levels of structure can influence

texture.

Table 14

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of Color

This portion reveals the test result of the test of significant mean difference of the

Cabbage Tart from T1-T4 in terms of color.

Sensory Formulation Mean Computed Critical P Decision Interpretation


Qualities F-value F-value Value
T1 8.00
T2 7.78
38

Color 0.81 2.69 0.81 Accept Not


Ho Significant
T3 7.67

T4 7.59

Table 14 unveils the difference among the four (4) treatments (T 1-T4) of in

terms of color. As to the difference in aroma between the four (4) treatments (T 1-

T4), the p value has obtained 0.81 which is greater than the alpha (a) at 0.05 that

leads to the decision of accepting the null hypothesis. Thus, there is no

significant difference in the weighted means among the four treatments (4)

treatments (T1-T4) in terms of color. To determine that there is no significant

difference among the four (4) treatments, different formulations or treatments are

subjected to F-test. The Fisher-test results reveal that, though the weighted

means are different, there is no significant difference between all the treatments

involved considering that all the p-values are greater than 0.05 level of

significance. All treatments differ in terms of color.

Considering the mean values shown above, the treatment (T 1) gets the

highest weighted mean of 8. 00 or Like Very Much which means that the

Cabbage Jam with the presence of cabbage (1 cup of Cabbage) is in favor in

terms of aroma among all the other formulations. According to Spence &

Fiszman (2016), color is perhaps the single most important product-intrinsic

sensory cue when it comes to setting our expectations regarding the likely taste

and flavor of food and drink. Changing the hue or intensity or saturation of the

color of a variety of different food and beverage items exerts a sometimes-


39

dramatic impact on the expectations, and often on the subsequent taste or flavor

experiences of the consumers even the participants of the lab.

Thus, color is possibly the single most important product-intrinsic sensory

signal when it comes to shaping our expectations on the expected taste and

flavor of food and drink (Spence, 2016).

Table 15

Test of Significant Mean Difference of the Weighted Mean of Tart Recipe


Utilizing Cabbage (Brassica olarecea var. capitata) Jam in Terms of General
Acceptability

This portion reveals the test result of the test of significant mean difference of the

Cabbage Tart from T1-T4 in terms of general acceptability.

Sensory Formulation Mean Computed Critical P Decision Interpretation

Qualities F-value F-value value

T1 7.78

T2 7.93
General 0.23 2.69 0.88 Accept Not
T3 7.59
Acceptability Ho Significant

T4 7.96

Table 15 unveils the difference among the four (4) treatments (T 1-T4) of in

terms of general acceptability. As to the difference in aroma between the four (4)

treatments (T1-T4), the p value obtains 0.88 which is greater than the alpha (a) at

0.05 that leads to the decision of accepting the null hypothesis. Thus, there is
40

no significant difference in the weighted means among the four treatments (4)

treatments (T1-T4) in terms of acceptability. To determine that there is no

significant difference among the four (4) treatments, different formulations or

treatments are subjected to F-test. The Fisher-test results reveal that, though the

weighted means are different, there is no significant difference between all the

treatments involved considering that all the p-values are greater than 0.05 level

of significance. All treatments differ in terms of general acceptability.

Considering the mean values shown above, the treatment (T 4) gets the

highest weighted mean of 7.96 or Like Very Much which means that the

Cabbage Jam with the presence of cabbage (2 cups of Cabbage) is in favors in

terms of aroma among all the other formulations. Acceptability encompasses

actor-based and dynamic decision processes, this includes products of

interactions among the actors, the object, and the context. The idea is that

acceptance and acceptability should be distinguished to gain more clarity in the

use of terms (Busse, M. et.al., 2018).

Thus, there are factors which determine whether a food will be acceptable

to an individual that includes the physiological state of the individual and social,

the institutional and motivational context of eating, serving, cooking or purchase.

The process through which an individual accepts or rejects food is considered to

be of a multi-dimensional nature. Sensory characteristics of food such as taste,

texture, aroma, and appearance have distinct and influential effects on food

acceptability. Therefore, a sensory attribute of food is considered the key area in


41

which food manufacturers can successfully use to differentiate their products

(Maina, J, 2018).

OUTPUT OF THE STUDY

TART RECIPE UTILIZING CABBAGE JAM FILLING INGREDIENT

The cabbage tart recipe is an innovative recipe that uses highly nutritious

foods in the human diet. The aim of this research is to investigate the nutritive

value of vegetables and the acceptability of vegetables as a vegetable product.

The jam can be made in four different ways. The treatments are T1, T2, T3, and

T4. Consumers will benefit from the prepared jam because it is nutritious,

healthy, and cost-effective. It does not have fat and cholesterol, which helps you

gain healthy weight.

The results of this investigation are in line with previous research on the

benefits of vegetables and their beneficial health effects, lowering risks for

chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. This study provides some

support for the benefits of including vegetables in the regular diet.

By:

Caminero, Monique Rabe, Mariztrelle


Davin, Stephen Narca, Catherine
Gealon, Jerralyn Nepangue, Vincent France
Glipa, June Rey Relatado, Princess Dhee
Saberon, John Warren
CHAPTER 3

SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


42

This chapter covers the summary of the outcomes of the study which

comprises the statements of the problems, findings, conclusions and

recommendations.

Summary

The main purpose of the study is to determine the general acceptability of

a tart recipe utilizing cabbage jam as a filling ingredient using four treatments.

The result of which can be used as the basis for a recipe guide.

Specifically, the study sought to determine the sensory analysis profile of

the cabbage jam from the four treatments in terms of flavor, texture, aroma,

color, and general acceptability. It also identifies the significant difference in the

sensory analysis and the cabbage jam, which implies that the T1 with the

appraisal of "like very much" is the most favorable formulation among other

treatments. This formulation can be recommended for recipe adoption.

Findings

Based on the results of the study gathered and treated statistically, the

following findings evolved:

Sensory Analysis of The Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage Jam as a filling

ingredient in terms of flavor, texture, aroma, color, and general

acceptability in T1 to T4

From the Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe Utilizing Cabbage Jam as a filling

ingredient in terms of all the attributes, the T1 was rated by the consumer

panelist Like Very Much in terms of color and aroma. In terms of flavor and
43

texture T2 was rated Like Very Much. However, as to general acceptability, T4

obtained Like Very Much.

Test of Significant Mean Difference of Sensory Analysis of Tart Recipe

Utilizing Cabbage Jam as a Filling Ingredients

After subjecting the result to One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), was

found that in terms of aroma, the sensory analysis obtained p-value which is

lesser than the alpha at 0.05 level of significance which leads to the decision of

rejecting the null hypothesis. This means that there is no significant difference

in the sensory analysis of tart recipe utilizing cabbage jam as a filling ingredient

from T1-T4 in terms of flavor, color, texture, and general acceptability as of the

reason that their p-value are greater than the alpha at 0.05 level of significance

which leads to the decision of accepting the null hypothesis. The data entails

those differences among the treatments of tart recipe utilizing cabbage jam

reflected in the sensory analysis are sufficient to mean a real significance in the

study. The groups perceived the attributes of the products differently. It can be

inferred that based on a result of the test there is a treatment that could be

considered as the best. According to the weighted mean, treatment 1 (T1) which

has ½ cup of cabbage as a flavoring ingredient is the best treatment in over-all

sensory evaluation as described as Like Very Much.

CONCLUSION
44

Among the four treatments, T1 which used cabbage jam in the composition

with the same amounts of the ingredients from the other treatments was match

favored by the consumer panelists in flavor, color, aroma, texture, and general

acceptability, having obtained a sensory description of Like Very Much.

Therefore, T1 is recommended for Recipe adoption.

RECOMMENDATION

1. A study of tart recipe utilizing cabbage jam as a filling ingredient is to

maintain its quality.

2. The most effective treatment that can be used as a recipe guide is T1 due

to its crispness of the tart’s crusts and the sweetness of the jam attributes

that consumers can be surely loved.

3. T4 are best suited for those who prefer cabbage tart whose filling is not so

sweet.

4. Cabbage Tart should be packed in airtight container or in Ziplock bags to

seal its freshness and prevent from going stale. It can be layered with

parchment paper to keep them separated.

REFERENCES
45

Journal

Anderson et.al, (2019). Flavors. Center for Research on Ingredient Safety.


Michigan State University.

Booth, D.A. (1981) Momentary acceptance of particular foods and processes that
change it, in Criteria of Food Acceptance, Forster Publishing, Zurich.

Busse, M. et.al., (2018). "Acceptance studies in the field of land use. A critical
and systematic review to advance the conceptualization of
acceptance and acceptability. Land Use Policy. Elsevier, vol. 76(C),
pages 235-245.

Chiplonkar S., et al (1999). Fornication of vegetarian diets for increasing


Bioavailable iron density using green leafy vegetables. Food Res Int, 32,
169-74.
David et.al (2018). Four Season tart. National college of science and
Technology.
Gandhi, V. (2014). Growth and Transformation of the Agribusiness Sector:
Drivers, Models and Challenges.
Jordbruksverket D. (2003). Consumption of foodstuffs. Year book of agricultural
Statistics. Orebro, Sweden: SCB-Tryck, 2003, 259-72.
Maina, J., (2018). Analysis of the factors that determine food acceptability.
Murang’a University of Technology, Department of Food Science and
Technology, Kenya. The Pharma Innovation Journal 2018; 7(5): 253-257.

Maritess C, et al. (2005). Alternative nutrition therapies in cancer patients. Sem


Oncol Nurs, 21, 173-6.
Medlin, B.D. (2001). The factors that may influence a faculty member's decision
To adopt electronic technologies in instruction (Doctoral dissertation)
Rokayya S. et al. 2020. Cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata).
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Sahin I., (2006). Detailed Review of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory
And Educational Technology-Related Studies Based on Rogers’ Theory.
The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
Samec D., et. al (2011). Antioxidant potency of white (Brassica oleracea L. var.
46

capitata) and Chinese (Brassica rapa L. var. pekinensis (Lour.)) cabbage:


The influence of development stage, cultivar choice and seed selection.
Sci Hort, 128, 78-83.
Sharif et.al (2007). Sensory Evaluation and Consumer Acceptability. October
2017. In book: Handbook of Food Science and Technology
(pp.362-386)Chapter: Sensory Evaluation and Consumer
Acceptability.

Singh-Ackbarali, D. (2014). Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, v3 n1 p10-27


2014. Sensory Evaluation as a Tool in Determining Acceptability of
Innovative Products Developed by Undergraduate Students in Food
Science and Technology at the University of Trinidad and Tobago.

Singh J, et al. (2006). Antioxidant phytochemicals in cabbage (Brassica oleracea


L. var. capitata). Sci Hort, 108, 233-7.
Szczesniak, A. (2007). Textural Perceptions And Food Quality. Journal of
Food Quality. Wiley Online Library. Volume14, Issue1. February 1991.
Pages 75-85.
Szczesniak, A.S. et. al (1992). The Spectrum Descriptive Analysis
Method. Journal of ASTM International: Manual Series. Technology,
Department of Food Science and Technology, Kenya. The Pharma
Innovation Journal 2018; 7(5): 253-257.
Tirasoglu, et.al. (2005). Determination of trace elements in cole (Brassica
oleraceae var. acephale) at Trabzon region in Turkey. J. Quantitative,
Spectroscopy, Radiative Transfer, 94: 181-187.

Internet Sources

Anthony M., (2007). The importance of Aroma. Food Processing.


https://www.foodprocessing.com/articles/2007/291/

Acedo A, et al. 2015. Supply chain losses of vegetables in Central Philippines.

Bundel A, (2018). Know Your GBBS History: Tart Week. Cabbage production
volume in the Philippines 2011-2020.Chemistry Industry (2009).
Flavorings. https://www.chemistryindustry.biz/flavorings.html
Christensen C.M, Food Texture Perception. Monell Chemical Senses Center and
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. Advances in Food Research Volume 29, 1984, Pages
159-199.
47

Danguin, T. (2019). Smelling Our Way to Tastier Foods. Health News. Healthline.

Flood, A. (2016). Understanding the Flavor of Food.


https://foodinsight.org/understanding-the- flavoroffood/#:~:text=The
%20primary%20function%20of%20flavors,more %20diverse%2
0variety%20of%20flavors.

Haiden Heath, 2019. Rampfesthudson.com.


https://www.rampfesthudson.com/what-is-everett-rogers-change-
theory/#:~:text=Diffusion%20of%20Innovation%20(DOI)%20Theory,this
%20that%20diffusion%20is%20possible.
Keefee, P. (2019). Smelling Our Way to Tastier Foods. Health News. Healthline.

Kilcast D. et. al, (1990). Structure and texture.). Structurertance in food quality.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.1990.tb00073.x

Kilcast, D. (2004). Solid Foods. Texture in Food. Volume 2: Solid Foods. A


volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology
and Nutrition Book • 2004
https://www.fnri.dost.gov.ph/images/images/news/PDRI-2018.pdf.

Kew. (2017). Brassica oleracea L." Plants of the World Online. Board of
Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens.
Narich creative innovation (2019). Colour gives us an expectation about
Taste and Quality. Application Food. Applications.
Phytochemicals with Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory
article_28350_52583657b77af22c1a222d7c5934562a.pdf (waocp.org).
Published by Statista Research Department, Oct 1, 2021.

Nera S, RPh, PharmD 2021. Health Benefits of Cabbage (Repolyo) Hello doctor
Skyscraper City-Cebu. 2021. Facebook.
Spence, C. (2015). On the psychological impact of food colour. Flavour 4, 21
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13411-015-0031-3
TimesofIndia.com. Jan 23, 2021, 21:00 IST.
APPENDICES
Republic of the Philippines
CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL
UNIVERSITY
MAIN CAMPUS
M. J. Cuenco Avenue Cor. R. Palma Street, Cebu City, Philippines
Website: http://www.ctu.edu.ph E-mail:
thepresident@ctu.edu.ph Phone: +6332
402 4060 loc. 1137

OFFICE OF THE
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT

APPENDIX A

LETTER REQUEST TO CONDUCT THE RESEARCH

April 27, 2022

Dr. Eingilbert C. Benolirao


Campus Director
Cebu Technological University
Argao, Cebu

Dear Dr. Benolirao,

The second year Bachelor of Science in hospitality Management (BSHM)


researchers will conduct a research titled “CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var.
capitata) TART: A RECIPE GUIDE” as partial requirement of the course Research in
Hospitality. In this connection, we would like to request permission from your good office
to allow us to carry out the said undertaking. Your favorable consideration and approval
to this request will be highly appreciated. Thank you very much for your support.

Very truly yours,

MONIQUE P. CAMINERO
Team Leader
Noted by:
DR. VENUS H. BALDEA
Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MRS. MARIEROSE M. DERRAMAS PAUL VINCENT DURAN


Chair, College of Hospitality Dean, College of Hospitality
Management and Tourism Management and Tourism
Approved by:

DR. EINGILBERT C. BENOLIRAO


Campus Director
Republic of the Philippines
CEBU TECHNOLOGICAL
UNIVERSITY
MAIN CAMPUS
M. J. Cuenco Avenue Cor. R. Palma Street, Cebu City, Philippines
Website: http://www.ctu.edu.ph E-mail:
thepresident@ctu.edu.ph Phone: +6332
402 4060 loc. 1137

OFFICE OF THE
UNIVERSITY PRESIDENT

APPENDIX A

LETTER REQUEST TO CONDUCT THE RESEARCH

April 27, 2022

Dr. Eingilbert C. Benolirao


Campus Director
Cebu Technological University
Argao, Cebu

Dear Dr. Benolirao,

The second year Bachelor of Science in hospitality Management (BSHM)


researchers will conduct a research titled “CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var.
capitata) TART: A RECIPE GUIDE” as partial requirement of the course Research in
Hospitality. In this connection, we would like to request permission from your good office
to allow us to carry out the said undertaking. Your favorable consideration and approval
to this request will be highly appreciated. Thank you very much for your support.

Very truly yours,

MONIQUE P. CAMINERO
Team Leader
Noted by:
DR. VENUS H. BALDEA
Adviser

Recommending Approval:

MRS. MARIEROSE M. DERRAMAS PAUL VINCENT DURAN


Chair, College of Hospitality Dean, College of Hospitality
Management and Tourism Management and Tourism
Approved by:

DR. EINGILBERT C. BENOLIRAO


Campus Director
50

APPENDIX B

ADOPTED RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

(9 POINT HEDONIC SCALE)

Dear Tasters:

The researchers are conducting a study on the General Acceptability of "TART


RECIPE REALIZING CABBAGE (Brassica oleracea var capitata) JAM AS A
FILLING INGREDIENTS" by using the four treatments, the instrument and rating
scale are important for the researcher and the beneficiaries of the study. Your
participation in the study by way of answering the instrument and rating the
samples are very significant to get the exact data and findings of the study.

SENSORY ANALYSIS: Section: _____ Gender: ______

Direction: Please check on the appropriate boxes that best describes your
senses with 9 as the highest and 1 as the lowest.

9- Like Extremely 8- Like very Much

7- Like Much 6- Like Moderately

5- Like Slightly 4- Neither Like nor

3-Dislike Slightly 2-Dislike Very

1- Dislike Extremely
51

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

Treatments Taste
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T1
T2
T3
T4

Treatment Color
s
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T1
T2
T3
T4

Treatment Textur
s e
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T1
T2
T3
T4

Treatment Flavor
s
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T1
T2
T3
T4

Treatments General Acceptability


9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
T1
T2
T3
52

T4

Appendix C

SAMPLE COMPUTATION

Weighted Mean- was used to determine the difference levels of responses.

Ʃƒw
WM ¿
n

Where: ƒ= represents each of the items or values


w = weight of each item or value
n = total number of weights
72+ 96+ 42+ 6+0+0+ 0+0+ 0
WM ¿
27

WM = 8.00

Treatment 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
(Color)
T1 8 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0

ANOVA (One way Analysis of Variance)- is used to determine whether there existed
significant mean difference among the means of the different treatments identified.

Source of Decisio Interpretati


Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit n on
Between 0.84259 0.28086
Groups 3 3 4 0.2280 0.87667 2.69197 Accept Not
Within 128.074 10 1.23148 7 2 9 Ho Significant
Groups 1 4 1
128.916 10
TOTAL 7 7
53

Appendix D

DOCUMENTATION
54
55
CURRICULUM
VITAE
57

CURRICULUM VITAE

MONIQUE P. CAMINERO

Bala-as, Argao, Cebu

09208028293

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : nic

Age : 19

Date of Birth : June 10, 2002

Place of Birth : Cebu City

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Secondary : Manlapay National High School

Elementary : Bala-as Elementary School


58

CURRICULUM VITAE

STEPHEN L. DAVIN

Bogo, Argao Cebu

09637928806

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : koping

Age : 20

Date of Birth : July 08 , 2001

Place of Birth : Dalaguete Cebu

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management


(Present)

Secondary : Argao National High School

Elementary : Bogo Elementary School


59

CURRICULUM VITAE

JERRALYN R. GEALON

Bug-ot, Argao Cebu

Phone Number : 09452914455

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : Jerra

Age : 20

Date of Birth : October 03, 2001

Place of Birth : Bug-ot, Argao Cebu

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management


Secondary : Argao National High School

Elementary : Bug-ot Elementary School


60

CURRICULUM VITAE

June Rey S. Glipa

Malones, Dalaguete, Cebu

09685549770

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : June

Age : 23

Date of birth : 06/16/1998

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management


Secondary : Cawayan National High School

Elementary : Malones Elementary School


61

CURRICULUM VITAE

MARIZTRELLE C. RABE

Binlod, Argao, Cebu

09494982312

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : Mariz

Age : 20

Date of Birth : June 16, 2001

Place of Birth : Binlod, Argao, Cebu

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management


Secondary : Cebu Technological University
Argao Campus

Primary : Binlod Elementary School


62

CURRICULUM VITAE

Catherine C.Narca

Binlod, Argao, Cebu

Phone Number : 09353222450

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : Cath

Age : 20

Date of Birth : September 9, 2001

Place of Birth : Cebu City

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Secondary : Argao National High School

Elementary : Bulasa Elementary School


63

CURRICULUM VITAE

VINCENT FRANCE B. NEPANGUE

Tapon, Dalaguete,Cebu

Phone number: 09073231178

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname: France

Age 21

Date of Birth 0ctober 04,2000

Place of Birth Balud Dalaguete Cebu

Citizenship Filipino

Religion Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary: Cebu Technological University

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Secondary: Dalaguete National High School

Elementary Panaguikan Elementary School


64

CURRICULUM VITAE

PRINCESS DHEE O. RELATADO

Canduran, Tulic, Argao Cebu

Phone Number : 09158705509

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : printit

Age : 21

Date of Birth : September 24, 2000

Place of Birth : Sapang Ama, Sapang Dalaga, Mis. Occ.

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary : Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Secondary : Argao National High School

Elementary : Calamba Central Elementary School


65

CURRICULUM VITAE

JOHN WARREN SABERON

Lamacan, Argao

09617640025

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Nickname : warren

Age : 23

Date of Birth : January 1, 1999

Place of Birth : Lamacan, Argao

Citizenship : Filipino

Religion : Roman Catholic

B. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

College: Cebu Technological University-Argao Campus

Bachelor of Science in Hospitality Management

Secondary: Argao National High School

Elementary: Tulic Elementary School

You might also like