Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Financial Statement Analysis
Financial Statement Analysis
(RATIO ANALYSIS)
Analysis of financial statements indicates strength and weakness of a company as well as trends
in its activities. Financial statements include;
Profit and loss Account/Income statement: Shows the performance of a company
throughout the financial period.
Balance sheet/ Statement of financial position: Shows the financial position or status
of a company.
Cash flow statement: Shows changes in cash position of the entity,
Financial statements can be analysed by the use of the following accounting ratios.
An item should satisfy the following criteria to qualify for cash equivalent.
The investment should be short term.
They should mature in less than three months. If they mature in more than three months they
will be classified as other investments.
They should be highly liquid.
This means that they should be easily sold in the market. The buyers of these investments
should be easily available.
They should be convertible to known amounts of cash.
This means that their market price should be available and this market price should not be
subject to significant fluctuations.
They should not be too risky.
There should be very little risk of changes in their value. This means that equity shares cannot
be classified as cash equivalents. But preferred shares purchased shortly before the redemption
date can be classified as cash equivalents.
b.) Long Term debt ratio = NON CURRENT LIABILITIES (Long Term
Debt)
TOTAL ASSETS
This measures the proportion of the total net assets financed by the non-owner supplied funds.
The higher the ratio, then the higher the financial risk.
Treasury shares is reacquired stock which is bought back by the issuing company, reducing the
amount of outstanding stock on the open market ("open market" including insiders' holdings).
It’s used to indicate the financial stability of a business. A business that finances most of its
assets through equity is considered more stable than that which finances them through debt.
Fixed charge coverage ratio is the number of times the company can cover its fixed charges
per year. The higher the number, the better the debt position of the firm, similar to the times
interest earned ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio includes lease payments, interest
payments and preferential dividend
f) Dividend Cover
= NET PROFIT AFTER TAX AND PREFERENCE DIVIDENDS OR
EPS
ORDINARY DIVIDENDS PAID AND PROPOSED
DPS
This gives the shareholder some idea as to the proportion that the ordinary dividends bear to
the amount available for distribution to ordinary shareholders. Usually, the dividend is
described as
being so many times covered by profits made. If, therefore, the dividend is said to be three
times
covered, it means that one-third of the available profits is being distributed as dividends.
1. Inflation; Due to inflation the value of a shilling last year is not the same as this year.
2. Seasonality trends; There may be a trend that may be influenced by other factors e.g.
population growth or population decline.
3. Historical in nature; Historical trends may not necessarily reflect the future.
4. Changes; e.g. Legal changes, Economic changes, Regulatory changes, Changes in
standards.
[B] With Respect To Cross Sectional Analysis
1. Unlikely to find a similar company like yours thus giving a crude idea rather than a
perfect one
2. Differences in accounting policies e.g. a company may depreciate its assets using
reducing balance method while another uses straight line basis.
3. Industry averages may be misleading. Average can be affected by extreme values e.g.
Co. A = 12 Million, Co. B = 6 Million, Co. C = 9 Million & Co. D = 1 Billion therefore
the average will be high due to Co. D.
(2,400,000) (3,300,000)
LESS: Expenses
(2,150,000) (2,700,000)
Balance sheets
JAMBO TRADERS UHURU TRADERS
CURRENT ASSETS
2,100,000 1,825,000
1,160,000 1,520,000
FINANCED BY:
1,160,000 1,520,000
Required:
Calculate the following ratios for each business and comment which business is more efficient
per every ratio.
1. Gross Profit Margin 6. Current ratio
Solution:
RATIO FORMULA JAMBO TRADERS UHURU TRADERS
1. Gross Profit GROSS PROFIT x 100 3,150,000 x 100 = 56.8% 4,200,000 x 100 = 56%
Margin
SALES 5,550,000 7,500,000
Comments; Jambo traders is more efficient than Uhuru traders because the higher the ratio the better. Measures th
ability of a business to control expenses associated with generating trading income.
2. Net Profit NET PROFIT (After Tax) x 100 1,000,000 x 100 =18% 1,500,000 x 100 = 20%
Margin
SALES 5,550,000 7,500,000
Comments; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because the higher the ratio the better. Measures th
ability of a business to control expenses associated with generating net income.
3. Expenses COST X 100 2,150,000 x 100 =38.7% 2,700,000 x 100 = 36%
ratio
SALES 5,550,000 7,500,000
Comments; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because the lower the ratio the better. A lower rati
shows how efficient a business is.
Comment; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because the higher the ratio the better. The rati
shows how active the business is in restocking. The higher the ratio the better.
Comment; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because the lower the ratio the better hence showin
fewer days of holding stock for a business.
Comments; Jambo traders is more efficient than Uhuru traders because it has a ratio that meets the rule of thum
while that of Uhuru traders is below the rule of thumb.
7. Acid test CURRENT ASSETS – STOCK 2,100,000 – 600,000= 1.4:1 1,825,000–700,000= 1.1:
ratio
CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,040,000 1,005,000
Comments; Jambo traders is more efficient than Uhuru traders because it has a ratio that is even above the rule o
thumb.
Comments; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because it has lower which shows reduced financia
risk exposure of debt.
9. Return on NET PROFIT (After Tax) x 100 1,000,000 x 100 =45.5% 1,500,000 x 100 = 59.4%
Investment
TOTAL ASSETS 2,200,000 2,525,000
(ROI)
Comments; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders. The higher the ratio the better because it shows th
proportion of profits attained to assets employed.
Comments; Uhuru traders is more efficient than Jambo traders because the higher the ratio the higher th
profitability due to an adequate return on capital employed
ILUSTRATION II
Riziki limited is an expanding private company that is planning to review its trend for the
current and previous year so as to embark on new strategies.
Profit Statement for Year Ended 31st December
YEAR 2010 (Shs.) 2011 (Shs.)
Current Assets
Stock 400,000 550,000
730,000 900,000
(430,000) (760,000)
1,100,000 1,290,000
FINANCED BY:
1,100,000 1,290,000
NOTE: Opening stock for year 2010 and 2011 is Shs. 120,000 and Shs. 190,000 respectively
Required:
[a] Calculate six accounting ratios for both 2010 and 2011 which would assess profitability and
liquidity of Riziki limited.
[b] Comment on the current position of Riziki limited with the aid of ratios and in comparison
to the two years.
Solution:
(ROCE)
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showing higher profitability due to a
adequate return on capital employed
2. Gross Profit GROSS PROFIT x 100 900,000 x 100 = 45% 1,400,000 x 100 = 44%
Margin
SALES 2,000,000 3,200,000
Comments; There is a decline in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio showing lower ability of the business to contro
expenses associated with generating trading income.
3. Net Profit NET PROFIT (After Tax) x 100 265,000 x 100 =13.3% 505,000 x 100 = 15.8%
Margin
SALES 2,000,000 3,200,000
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showing higher ability of the business t
control expenses associated with generating net income.
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showing more efficiency in generatin
revenues and profits using available resources.
Comment; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio and the higher the ratio the better. The rati
shows how active the business is in restocking.
Comment; There is an improvement in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio (days) and the lower the ratio the bette
hence showing fewer days of holding stock for a business.
Comments; There is a decline in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio that goes far below the rule of thumb that is 2:1
8. Acid test CURRENT ASSETS – STOCK 730,000 – 400,000= 0.8:1 900,000–550,000= 0.5:1
ratio
CURRENT LIABILITIES 430,000 760,000
Comments; There is a decline in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio that goes even lower that of the rule of thum
(1:1)
9. Debt ratio TOTAL LIABILITIES 680,000 = 0.44 870,000 = 0.42
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio which shows reduced financial ris
exposure of debt.
10 Return on NET PROFIT (After Tax) x 100 265,000 x 100 =17.3% 505,000 x 100 = 24.6%
Investment
TOTAL ASSETS 1,530,000 2,050,000
(ROI)
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio and the higher the ratio the better it show
the proportion of profits attained to assets employed.
Con’t…
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showing more stability in equity financing
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showingno of times interest can be serve
before profit is exhausted
13 Return on EARNINGS AFTER TAX AND 265,000= 0.31 x 100 = 31% 505,000 = 0.00043 x 100
Shareholder PREFERENTIAL DIVIDEND
850,000 1,180,000 = 0.043%
s’ Equity
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(ROSHE)
Comments; There is a decline in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio because The higher the ratio the higher th
profitability of the equity investment.
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio showing more efficiency with which a
assets are used to generate profits
15 Earnings NET PROFIT DUE TO ORDINARY 265,000= Sh. 5.30/ Share 505,000=Sh. 10.10/ Shar
Per Share SHAREHOLDERS
50,000 50,000
(E.P.S)
NO OF SHARES
Comment; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio because the higher the ratio the higher th
profitability of each share.
16 Dividend TOTAL DIVIDEND (Ordinary) 125,000= Sh. 2.50/ Share 175,000=Sh. 3.50/ Share
Per Share
NO OF ORDINARY SHARES 50,000 50,000
(D.P.S)
Comment; There is an improvement in 2011 due to increase in the ratio because the higher the ratio the higher th
dividend of each share.
17 Dividend DPS x 100 2.50 = 0.47 3.50 = 0.34
Payout
EPS 5.30 10.10
Ratio
Comments; There is an improvement in 2011 due to decrease in the ratio because if the ratio is low then retentio
percentage is high.
ILLUSTRATION III
The following financial statements relates to ABC limited for the year ending 2006.
ABC Ltd
Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31.12.2006
Sales 850,000
Less:Cost of sales
Purchases 559,500
LESS: Expenses
Depreciation 10,000
Interest (15,000)
330,000
Current Assets
Inventory 149,000
Debtors 75,000
Cash 30,000
250,000
Creditors (130,00)
FINANCED BY:
Reserve 90,000
450,000
Additional Note
*Cash purchases amount to 14,250. *Assume Market Price for the ABC’S shares is
Sh20/Share.
Required;
Calculate the following ratios:
LIQUDITY RATIOS
1. Current Current Assets 250,000 = 1.92 : 1 The higher the ratio then the
Ratio more liquid the firm is.
Current Liabilities 130,000
2. Quick Ratio/ Current Assets - Inventories 250,000 – 149,000 = 0.78 The higher the ratio, the better
Acid Test :1 for the firm as it means an
Ratio Current Liabilities improved liquidity position.
130,000
3. Cash Ratio Cash + Marketable Securities 30,000 = 0.23 : 1 The higher the ratio, the bette
for the firm as the Liquidit
Current Liabilities 130,000 position is improved.
4. Net Working Net Working Capital 120,000 = 0.27 : 1 The higher the ratio the better
Capital for the firm and therefore the
Ratio. (CA -CL) 450,000 improved Liquidity position.
Net Assets (Net Worth)
GEARING RATIOS
5. Debt Ratio Total Liabilities 230,000 = 0.4 The higher the ratio, the higher
the financial risk. (Measures
Total Assets 580,000 proportion of total assets
financed by non owner supplie
funds)
6. Debt Equity Total Liabilities 230,000 = 0.66 The higher the ratio, then the
Ratio higher the financial risk.
Net Worth (share holders 350,000 (Measures financing by the
funds) non-owner supplied funds in
relation to the amount financed
by the owners)
7. Long Term Non Current Liabilities 100,000 = 0.2 The higher the ratio, then the
Debt Ratio higher the financial risk.
Net Assets 450,000 (Measures proportion of total
net assets financed by the non-
owner supplied funds.)
ACTIVITY RATIOS
8. Stock Cost of Sales 510,000 = 4.1 Times The higher the ratio the more
Turnover active the firm is.( Number of
Average Stocks 124,250 times stock has been converted
to sales in a financial year)
9. Debtors Credit Sales 850,000 = 11.97 The higher the ratio, the more
Turnover active the firm has been
Debtors 71,000 (Business had debtors over 11
times to generate the sales)
10. Average 360 360 = 31 days The lesser the period, the better
Collection for the firm as it improves the
Debtors Turnover 11.97 liquidity position.
Period
11. Creditors Credit Purchases 545,250 = 4.2 Times The lesser the ratio the better.
Turnover
Creditors 130,000 (Measure no. of times we hav
creditors during a financia
period)
12. Non Current Sales 850,000 = 2.54 Times The higher the ratio the mor
Assets active the firm. (Measures th
Non Current Assets 330,000 efficiency with which the firm
Turnover
using its Non Current Assets t
generate sales)
13. Total Assets Sales 850,000 = 1.47 Times Measures the efficiency with
Turnover which the firm is using its total
Total Assets 580,000 assets to generate sales.
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
14. Gross Profit Gross Profit x 100 165,000 x 100 = 19% The higher the margin, the mor
Margin profitable the firm is.
Sales 850,000
15. Net Profit Net Profit (After Tax)x 100 75,000 x 100 = 9% The higher the margin, the mor
Margin profitable the firm is.
Sales 850,000
16. Return on Net Profit (After Tax) x 100 75,000 x 100 = 13% The higher the ratio the more
Investment efficient is the firm. Shows how
Total Assets 580,000 efficient the firm has been in
using the total assets to generat
returns in the business.
17. Return on EBIT x 100 165,000 = 37% The higher the ratio the more
Capital efficient is the firm. Measures
Employed Capital Employed 450,000 how efficient the firm has been
in using the net assets to
generate returns in the business
EQUITY RATIOS
18. Earnings Per Net Profit due to Ordinary 75,000 = Sh. 3.75/ Share This is the return expected by
Share (Eps) Shareholders an investor for every share held
20,000 in the firm.
No. of Shares
19. Earnings Earnings Per Share x 100 3.75 100% = 19% The higher the amounts, th
Yield better for the firm. (Retur
Market price per share 20 amount expected by
shareholder for every shillin
invested in the business)
20. Dividend Per Total Dividend (Ordinary) 15,000 = Sh. 0.75/ Share The higher the amounts, th
Share better for the firm. (Amoun
No Of Ordinary Shares 20,000 expected by an investor fo
every share held in the firm)
ILLUSTRATION IV
Raha Ltd is a new entrant in the market. It’s reviewing the financial statements of two
companies, Hyper Ltd and Super Ltd to ascertain its position. All the companies trade in
supplying house hold goods. Their most recent financial statements appear below.
PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 20X8
HYPER LTD SUPER LTD
(3,000,000) (4,800,000)
LESS: Expenses
Current Assets
Stock 400,000 800,000
1,350,000 1,880,000
FINANCED BY:
1,950,000 6,890,000
Required:
a) Measure profitability, liquidity, gearing and management of the elements of working
capital by use of THREE ratios for each category for both Hyper and Super ltd. Show
all workings. (12 marks)
b) Compare the two companies with regards to the calculated ratios. (8 marks)
SOLUTION a)
Profitability Ratios HYPER LTD SUPER LTD
1. Gross Profit Gross Profit x 100 1,000,000 100% = 25% 1,200,000 100% = 20%
Margin
Sales 4,000,000 6,000,000
2. Net Profit Net Profit (After Tax) x 100 500,000 100% = 12.5% 400,000 100% = 6.7%
Margin
Sales 4,000,000 6,000,000
3. Return on EBIT x 100 510,000 = 26.2% 800,000 = 11.6%
Capital
Employed Capital Employed 1,950,000 6,890,000
4. Return on Net Profit (After Tax) x 100 380,000 x 100 = 12.1% 310,000 x 100 = 3.9%
Investment
Total Assets 3,150,000 7,880,000
5. Return on Earnings After Tax and 380,000 x 100 = 19.5% 310,000 x 100 = 10.7%
Shareholder Preferential Dividend
’s Equity 1,950,000 2,890,000
(ROSHE) Shareholders’ Equity
2. Quick Ratio/ Current Assets - Inventories 1,350,000 – 400,000 = 1,880,000 – 800,000 = 1.1:1
Acid Test 0.8:1
Ratio Current Liabilities 990,000
1,200,000
b)
Profitability
Hyper has a higher gross margin than Super. This may indicate a differing pricing
policy.
Super’s net margin is lower than Hyper’s. Super’s expenses are therefore proportionally
higher. It should be noted that Super’s bottom line profit is reduced significantly by the
interest charge.
Return on Super’s capital is around half of Hyper’s. Super has a higher fixed asset base
due in part to a revaluation. It may be that a revaluation of Hyper’s assets will partially
close the gap.
Liquidity
Super has nearly twice as many current assets as current liabilities. Although both
companies’ quick ratios are much closer, Hyper’s liquidity does appear to be an issue
especially as there is no cash at hand. It would be wise to examine projected cashflows
to see how readily Hyper’s profits will improve this situation.
Working capital management
Hyper is turning stock over more quickly than Super. This is beneficial in a market
which can be subject to obsolescence.
Hyper’s creditor and debtor days are a cause for concern. Debtors should be collected
within the shortest time possible hence Super ltd collects its debts faster than Hyper.
Creditors should be paid at least as quickly as Super pays theirs. Hyper risks damaging
the goodwill it has with its suppliers.
Gearing
Super is highly geared whereas Hyper has no long-term loans. Super’s gearing means
that should profits fall they may not be in a position to pay the loan interest. Hyper’s
capital is entirely share capital and so a fixed return is not required.
Super’s loan appears to be fixed rate. This means that in times of falling interest rates
Super will have higher interest costs than say, Hyper, if Hyper borrowed the same
amount. The converse is true in times of rising interest rates.
As Hyper has no long-term loans they may be able to borrow in order to improve
liquidity.