Manuel Chavez supports high-speed rail as a solution to traffic congestion and believes it will help the state's economy, but provides no evidence on its impact. Debra Chou opposes high-speed rail, citing evidence from studies that it is costly with little proof of benefits and does not match how people typically travel between cities for work or appointments. The second speaker's argument against high-speed rail is deemed more credible because it is backed by stronger evidence and statistics.
Manuel Chavez supports high-speed rail as a solution to traffic congestion and believes it will help the state's economy, but provides no evidence on its impact. Debra Chou opposes high-speed rail, citing evidence from studies that it is costly with little proof of benefits and does not match how people typically travel between cities for work or appointments. The second speaker's argument against high-speed rail is deemed more credible because it is backed by stronger evidence and statistics.
Manuel Chavez supports high-speed rail as a solution to traffic congestion and believes it will help the state's economy, but provides no evidence on its impact. Debra Chou opposes high-speed rail, citing evidence from studies that it is costly with little proof of benefits and does not match how people typically travel between cities for work or appointments. The second speaker's argument against high-speed rail is deemed more credible because it is backed by stronger evidence and statistics.
Manuel Chavez supports high-speed rail as a solution to traffic congestion and believes it will help the state's economy, but provides no evidence on its impact. Debra Chou opposes high-speed rail, citing evidence from studies that it is costly with little proof of benefits and does not match how people typically travel between cities for work or appointments. The second speaker's argument against high-speed rail is deemed more credible because it is backed by stronger evidence and statistics.
Do you think high speed rail or commuter trains can solve
traffic congestion? Since many cities are discovering methods for solving this problem, high speed rail has become a popular topic among states. Manuel Chavez, State Representative, supports the high speed rail way in favor of his opinion while Debra Chou opposes the high speed rail way. The second speaker has more credible resources since it has encountered stronger evidence, studies and statistics. The first speaker states that the high speed rail way can help the state's economy by creating jobs. However, there is no evidence how many percent it will succeed and how helpful the high speed rail will be to the state economy. On the other hand, the second speaker provides why the high speed rail way is not suitable for the state with evidence. For example, “It is costly and there is slim proof….”, “Because high speed trains travel from the center of one city to the center of another………doctor’s appointment does not.” which prove first person’s speech is unreliable and support for high speed rail is not as useful as expected.