Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Notes
Revision Notes
Revision Notes
Topics
1. Introduction
2. Marriage & De Facto Relationships
3. Divorce and Separation
4. Parenting
5. Parenting Orders
6. Child Support
7. Child Abduction
8. Family Violence and Risk
9. Property
10. Financial Agreements
Obtaining Orders – By Consent Outside of Proceedings
1. File with the Court
a) Minute of Consent Order (contains proposed consent orders – given with Application)
b) Application for Consent Orders
c) Annexure to Draft Consent Parenting Orders – Notice of Risk, Abuse and Family
Violence (parenting only)
d) Evidence of Superannuation Value and Procedural Fairness (Property only – requiring
superannuation split)
• The Court can make injunctions to protect parties and property during proceedings, if
required – i.e. non-attendance at property, non-disposal/destruction.
• Family Violence – INDEPENDENTLY is not a property consideration.
• Family violence is considered through its effect on other elements of a property
consideration – i.e. ‘considerations’.
• Family Violence is a negative contribution.
[First Court Event] → [Interim Hearing (if required)] → [Dispute Resolution] → [Compliance
and Readiness Hearing] → [Trial Management Hearing (if required)] → Final Hearing.
• Court cannot make a Parenting Order unless they are satisfied that the Orders mitigate
the risk factors identified in the material filed with the Court.
• The Court must weigh up the s 60CC Factors against the Risk Factors to determine the
most appropriate orders. Injunctions are often used to mitigate risk – i.e. restrictions on
drug and alcohol consumption.
*If both parents are/can be assessed for child support, then they must both be parties to the
agreement.
Property Settlement – 4 STEP PROCESS
(1) Identify assets and liabilities that comprise the property pool;
(2) Assess the financial and non-financial contributions of each party;
(3) Consider the factors outlined in s 75(2) to determine if there should be any adjustment in
favour of a party, based on their capacity to support themselves in the future; and the
Future Needs Considerations – use of the Court’s Discretion.
(4) Consider whether the proposed final property orders are ‘just and equitable’.
Assessing Contributions
Initial Contributions
• Determine property pool that existed at time relationship commenced.
• Determine financial position of each party as at commencement of relationship.
During Relationship
• What, if any, assets from the commencement of the relationship have been maintained.
How have they been maintained?
• What changes have occurred to the financial positions of each party? Changes to
qualifications, earnings, health etc.
• What roles have the parties undertaken during the relationships?
• Have the parties received any lump sum/unusual benefits during the relationship?
Post Separation
• Identify property pool at time of separation.
• Repeat steps for during the relationship considerations.
b) In the circumstances that have arisen since the order was made, it is impracticable for
the order to be carried out or impracticable for a part of the order to be carried out;
• An asset allocated under the Orders has been repossessed or lost to the parties,
through no fault of the parties. (e.g. the loss of property by natural disaster).
c) Person has defaulted in carrying out an obligation imposed on the person by the order,
and, in the circumstances that have arisen as a result of that default, it is just and equitable
to vary the order or to set the order aside and make another order in substitution for the
order;
• Due to the failure to pay liabilities assigned under the Orders the other party has been
subjected to recovery action or placed into bankruptcy.
d) In the circumstances that have arisen since the making of the order, being circumstances
of an exceptional nature relating to the care, welfare, and development of a child of the
marriage, the child or the applicant will suffer hardship if the court does not vary the order
or set it aside and make another order in substitution.
• Simpson & Hamlin – agreed that a simple change to custodial arrangements would
not itself constitute “exceptional circumstances”, but that surrounding circumstances
were exceptional.
• Liu & Liu (1984) – What amounts to exceptional circumstances is a matter of fact and
degree.
e) A proceeds of crime order has been made covering property of the parties to the
marriage or either of them, or a proceeds of crime order has been made against a party
to the marriage.
• The making of a property settlement order cannot be done to defeat the interests of
a third party.