Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Nuisance
5 Nuisance
5 Nuisance
This is applicable where there has been interference on one neighbor or only a
limited number of neighbors
Requirements
1 the interference must be an on-going one and not just one single , isolated
or random act
2 There must be unreasonable use of land by D which causes an
unreasonable and unjustifiable degree of interference with P’s rights to
use and enjoyment of his land. In this investigation the salient factors
considered are;
Nature of locality (ie rural, urban, industrial etc)
Was the degree of I interference trivial or substantial
Whether the user is a common and ordinary one given the nature of
the locality ( If D is a normal or common user but interferes with
his neighbor’s land with the sole purpose of achieving adverse
effects, he will be liable because he was actuated by malice which
is also known as spite-fence situation)
If the nuisance arose in the course of D taking steps to protect his
property, where there no less drastic alternatives that could be
employed.
Usually the reasonable man test is applied and only normal sensitivities of ordinary
citizens will be considered and not that of abnormally sensitive individuals to noise
or smell. Damages can only be claimed in our law if there has been patrimonial
loss. In the absence of patrimonial loss but irritation then an interdict is the sole
remedy.
This is nuisance which affects the public at large or some considerable section of
the public, It often results in class actions mostly against corporate that pollute the
environment with toxic effluence or noise from their operations. Public nuisance is
largely a subject matter of controls contained in legislation such as those that
regulate pollution affecting public health etc .Some examples of legislation Public
Health Act , Factories and Works Act. Environmental Management Act