Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chem 23.1 Acetic Acid
Chem 23.1 Acetic Acid
Chem 23.1 Acetic Acid
bstract: The method of titration with a calibrated sodium hydroxide solution is used in this experiment to measurethe
A
molarityofasolutionandthepercentbymassofaceticacidinvinegar.Furthermore,astocksolutionofstandardizedsodium
hydroxide solution is being prepared. Titration of potassium hydrogen phthalate, KHP solution, with NaOH solution
standardizestheNaOHsolution.DissolvingKHPindistilledwateryieldstheKHPstocksolution.Aceticacid,CH3COOH,isa
colorlesssolutionofanorganicmoleculethatisaweakacid.Apartfromwater,thisacidisasignificantcomponentinvinegar.
TitrationwithastandardizedsodiumhydroxideNaOHsolutionisusedinthisexperimenttoestimatethemolarityofasolution
andthepercentbymassofaceticacidinvinegar.Thisexperimenthasbeendividedintotwoparts:firstisstandardizingthe
NaOHsolution,andsecondisdeterminingthemolarityofasolutionandthepercentbymassofaceticacidinvinegar.The
KHPsolutionistitratedwithNaOHinordertostandardizetheNaOHsolutionwithPotassiumAcidPhthalate.TheKHPsolution
ispreparedbydiluting0.8gofKHPin50mLofdistilledwater.Theexperimentisthenfollowedbythesecondphase,inwhich
thestandardizedNaOHsolutionistitratedwithvinegarthathasbeendilutedwithdistilledwater.Parts1and2titrationsare
donethreetimestoobtainoutcomesthataremoreaccurate.Overall,thebiggerthemassofsoluteintheacidsolution,the
more concentrated the solution gets. As a result, the larger the molarity, the greater the volume of NaOH required to
neutralize the acid. The experiment has been completed and successfully carried out.
eywords: Standardization, Vinegar, Sodium Hydroxide NaOH Solutions, Potassium hydrogen phthalate, KHP,
K
Phenolphthalein, Titration, Acid-Base Titration, Acetic Acid, CH3OOH, Neutralization
The volume of NaOH used when entirelyreactingto aOH must be standardized since its hygroscopic
N
a ceticacidinthesecondpartoftheexperimentis56.3mL nature hinders precise molarity determination by
for trial A, 88.9 mL for trial B, and 61.3 mL for trial C. mass alone. Itsmolaritycanbepreciselydetermined
Furthermore,the%m/vacidityofCH3COOHinDelMonte by titrating it with a known acid solution and
RedCaneVinegaris4.7%intrialA,7.5%intrialB,and5.2% measuring the volume necessary at the equivalence
in trial C. The experiment was a success considering all point. This standardized NaOH ensures precision in
objectivesweresatisfied.Vinegarcomprisesaceticacidand
future titrations[1].
water. The Philippine government requires a minimum
acidity of 4%. In conclusion, the Del Monte Red Cane Reference:
Vinegar meets the required minimum acidity.
[ 1]The Standardization of NaOH and KHP. (2023,
Author Contributions October30).TheStandardizationofNaOHandKHP.
https://www.odinity.com/standardization-naoh-khp/
bstract: AJT, SOTECH
A
Introduction: NMB, MMD SOTECH 2. hy is there a need to use CO2-free distilled
W
Conceptualization: NMB, MMD, AJT SOTECH water in this analysis?
Data curation: MMD, SOTECH
Visualization: MMD, SOTECH It is essential to use CO2- free distilled water in
Discussion: NMB, MMD, SOTECH chemical analysis for two reasons. CO2 in water
Methodology: MMD, SOTECH produces carbonic acid, which lowers pH and may
ause errors in pH-sensitive research, and can
c f oundthatthecarbonicacidproducedbythedissolvedCO2
interfere with chemical reactions, reducing the can back-titrate an over titrated solution (Kim et.al, 2009).
precision of measurements, particularly in
bicarbonate-sensitive tests. CO2- free distilled water
ensures a balanced pH and eliminates interference,
allowing for precise and credible results in these Reference:
tests[1]. [ 1] Science Equip. (n.d)Everythingyouneedtoknow
Reference: about Back Titration
https://www.scienceequip.com.au/blogs/news/what
[ 1]Acid-BaseTitrations.(2023,October31).Acid-Base -is-back-titration-and-its-uses
Titrations.https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materi
als/Demos_Techniques_and_Experiments/General_La [ 2] Kim et.al. (2009, O
ctober 1). H
ow to Save
b_Techniques/Titration/Acid-Base_Titrations Overshot Titrations: A Bubbly New Twist to Finish
Acid Base Titrations
3. earch literature and discuss the principle
S
ttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/267355930_Ho
h
behind why phenolphthalein changes color. w_to_Save_Overshot_Titrations
The color of phenolphthalein changes due to 6. hat could be the possible sources of error in
W
ionization,whichchangestheshapeofthephenolphthalein the experiment?
molecules. Ionized molecules attract molecules with
opposing charges and repel molecules with the same here are many possible sources of error. The first
T
charge. Although its ionappearspink,phenolphthaleinisa type of error is human error, which can mean
weakacidthatiscolorlessinsolution.Whenhydrogenions misreading of the instruments, improper handling of
(H+, as found inacids)areintroducedtothepinksolution,
the chemicals, etc. Next would be chemical errors,
the equilibrium shifts and the solution becomes colorless.
The addition of hydroxide ions (OH-, found in bases) oftentimes these are caused by impurities in the
converts the phenolphthalein into its ion, turning the chemicals or if a solution is not properly mixed.
solution pink. Phenolphthalein is colorless by nature but Equipmenterrorscanoccurinmultipleways,suchas
becomes pink in alkaline solutions. The compound is contaminations and physical defects. Environmental
colorlessthroughouttheacidicpHrange,butbeginstoturn errors can occur when a chemical is exposed to
pinkatpH8.2andprogressestoabrilliantmagentaatpH10 different factors that could change how it behaves,
and higher[1]. suchaslightorair.Lastly,thereareproceduralerrors,
which canoccurwhiledoingtheexperimentsuchas
improper mixing of the solution and cleaning of the
Reference: equipment[1].
[ 1]Kozlowski, R. (2020, February 16). Sciencing. Retrieved
from sciencing.com:
Reference:
https://sciencing.com/phenolphthalein-change-color-5271 [ 1] Abbas A. (2023, April 12) Sources of Errors in
431.html
Titration. Master Chemistry
4. re‘equivalencepoint’and‘endpoint’thesame?
A
If yes, why? Otherwise, differentiate the two. ttps://themasterchemistry.com/sources-of-errors-i
h
n-titration/
ndpoints and equivalence pointsaretwodistinctstepsin
E
thetitrationprocess.Anequivalencepointisdefinedasthe
point at which the totalnumberofmolesoftwosolutions
becomes equal. The end point, on the otherhand,comes
after the comparable point. It signifies a stage in which a
changeincolororintensityindicatesthecompletionofthe
reaction[1].
eference:
R
[1]https://www.vedantu.com/chemistry/difference-betwee
n-endpoint-and-equivalence-point
inceover-titrationmeansthatthereisanexcessamountof
S
reagentinthesolution,back-titrationisaddingananalyteto
the over-titrated sample to reverse the titration. The
back-titration neutralizes the excess reagent and the
sample’s data is able to be recorded and used.
(𝑀𝑜
𝑓𝑇
𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙1
) +(𝑀𝑜
𝑓𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙2
)+( 𝑀𝑜𝑓𝑇
𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙3
)
𝐴 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 =
Appendices 3
0.07008475689𝑀
+
0.07062711374𝑀
+
0.06920825698𝑀
𝐴 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑀 = 3
Calculations:
Trial 1
( 250𝑚
50𝑚
𝐿
𝐿 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐶
𝐻
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
= 1. 182894285𝑔𝐶𝐻
3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝑔𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒𝐾𝐻𝑃 = 0. 9998𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦× 0. 8160𝑔𝐾𝐻𝑃 =
𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜
𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
% 𝑣 = 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑜 𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑥100
. 8158368𝑔𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒𝐾𝐻𝑃
0
Trial 2 𝑚 1.182894285𝑔
𝐶𝐻
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝑔𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒𝐾𝐻𝑃 = 0. 9998𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦× 0. 8252𝑔𝐾𝐻𝑃 = % 𝑣 = 25𝑚𝐿𝐶
𝐻3𝐶 𝑂𝑂𝐻
×100 = 4. 73157714%
. 82503496𝑔𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑒𝐾𝐻𝑃
0 Trial B= 88. 5𝑚𝐿𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻× 1000𝑚 = 0. 0885𝐿
1𝐿
Trial 3 𝐿
𝐾𝐻𝑃 =
204.2231𝑔
(0. 0699733758 𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐿 )
𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 (0. 0885𝐿𝑁
𝑜𝑙𝐶
𝑚
𝑎𝑂𝐻) 𝑚
𝐻
𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 (
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
)( 250𝑚𝐿
50𝑚
𝐿 )
𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙1 = 57𝑚𝐿
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 = 0. 8158368𝑔𝐾𝐻𝑃 ×
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
1 𝐻𝑃
( 60.053𝑔
𝐶𝐻
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐶
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝐻3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻 ) = 1. 859434178𝑔𝐶𝐻3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻
04.2231𝑔𝐾
2 𝐻𝑃
𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜
𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
1𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻 −3
% 𝑣 = 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑜 𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑥100
× 1𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
𝐻𝑃
= 3. 994831143 × 10 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
𝑚 1.859434178𝑔𝐶𝐻
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝑜𝑙𝑜
𝑚 𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻 % 𝑣 = 25𝑚𝐿𝐶
𝐻3 𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
×100 = 7
. 437736712%
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦(𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙1) = 𝐿𝑜
𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
1𝐿
3.995630269×10 𝑚
−3
𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
Trial C=61. 3𝑚𝐿𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻× 1000𝑚
𝐿
= 0. 0613𝐿
𝑀(𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙1) = 1𝐿
= 0. 07008475689𝑀
57𝑚𝑙× 1000𝑚
𝐿
𝑔𝑜𝑓𝐶𝐻3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻 =
𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙2 = 57. 2𝑚𝐿
×
1𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻
1𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
𝐻𝑃
= 4. 039864971× 10 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
−3
( 60.053𝑔
𝐶𝐻
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐶
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝐻3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻 ) =1. 8678384𝑔𝐶𝐻3𝐶
𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑜
𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻 𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜
𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦(𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙2) = 𝐿𝑜
𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 % 𝑣 = 𝑥100
𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑜 𝑓𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
−3
4.039864971×10 𝑚
𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻 1.8678384𝑔
𝐶𝐻
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
𝑀(𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙2) = 1𝐿 = 0. 07062711374𝑀 𝑚
% 𝑣 = ×100 = 5. 151788254%
57.2𝑚
𝑙× 1000𝑚
𝐿
25𝑚
𝐿𝐶𝐻
3𝐶𝑂𝑂𝐻
−3
4. 048683033 × 10 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑜
𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦(𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙3) = 𝐿𝑜
𝑓𝑁
𝑎𝑂𝐻𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛