Police officers conducted a search and found Luisito Go with a gun in his waist at a disco house. They searched his car and found shabu, drug paraphernalia, and a police ID card. Go was unable to produce a license for the gun. The court upheld Go's arrest as valid and the seizure of evidence as lawful. It found Go guilty of illegal possession of a firearm and shabu based on the evidence presented.
Police officers conducted a search and found Luisito Go with a gun in his waist at a disco house. They searched his car and found shabu, drug paraphernalia, and a police ID card. Go was unable to produce a license for the gun. The court upheld Go's arrest as valid and the seizure of evidence as lawful. It found Go guilty of illegal possession of a firearm and shabu based on the evidence presented.
Police officers conducted a search and found Luisito Go with a gun in his waist at a disco house. They searched his car and found shabu, drug paraphernalia, and a police ID card. Go was unable to produce a license for the gun. The court upheld Go's arrest as valid and the seizure of evidence as lawful. It found Go guilty of illegal possession of a firearm and shabu based on the evidence presented.
Facts: • On October 22, 1992, police officers received an intelligence report regarding the supply of methamphetamine hydrochloride (shabu) at a location in Calamba, Laguna. • Police officers went to a disco house to conduct a search for illegally possessed firearms under "Operation Bakal." • They found accused-appellant Luisito Go inside the disco with a gun tucked in his waist. He was unable to produce a license for the gun. • Accused-appellant's car was also searched, and the police found a Philippine National Police identification card and drug paraphernalia. • An attaché case in the car contained shabu and money. • Accused-appellant was arrested and charged with illegal possession of a firearm and illegal possession of shabu. Issues: • Whether the arrest of accused-appellant was valid. • Whether the seizure of the gun and the discovery of shabu and drug paraphernalia were lawful. • Whether accused-appellant had a valid license for the firearm. • Whether accused-appellant's guilt for illegal possession of a firearm and shabu was proven beyond reasonable doubt. Ruling: • The arrest of accused-appellant was found to be valid. It was a warrantless arrest conducted when the police saw the gun in his waist, which made him appear to be committing a crime. This fell within the recognized exceptions for warrantless arrests. • The seizure of the gun was lawful as it was an incident to the valid arrest. The discovery of shabu and drug paraphernalia in the car was also deemed legal as they were in plain view during the search. • Accused-appellant failed to produce a valid license for the firearm, and the court found that the license presented for the first time on appeal was dubious and untimely. • Accused-appellant's guilt for illegal possession of a firearm and shabu was established beyond reasonable doubt based on the evidence presented. He was sentenced to an indeterminate penalty for both offenses. In summary, the court upheld the validity of accused-appellant's arrest and the legality of the seizures, and it found him guilty of the charges of illegal possession of a firearm and shabu. The penalties were adjusted to reflect changes in the law.