::::

7-a

-!
='
lt
!
=-' SCZIN
ry
=\
CAB ENGINEERS PRTVAf,E LIMITED DiaI: 033 zzBE 2slti SEP
Fax : 033 228E 2326 N- '
ry I-C, EVEREST HOUSE,4rc, CHO11RINGHEE ROAD, KOLKATA. T(}(} (}7I E-mail : cabengineer@yahoo.co.i n
=tI
t{
GST No. : 19AABCCI668GIZO . PAI\I No. : AABCC1668G . CIN : U45202WBf975PTC030236
=t
q
={
{tr Date : 28.09.2021
\ ,!
To, I

The Managing Director,

n il
=

=''
t
BENFISH
Yt{ Bengal State Fishermen's Co-operative Federation Ltd.
W\,
={ 31 G.
Kolkata
N. Block, sector-v, sart Lake bity
q{ - 700091
I

-aI
=

Sir/ Madarn
:
hq
t Sub: construction of r00MT Ice prant at Frezergunj
in the district of south 24
{!
;-
Parganas.

q work order No. : zggrrilt2r7fi4 dated r3.03.20rs

- Ref:
t \ Our letter dated I 6.07.2021
-_q This is to inform you that Technical Expertise
was sought from your esteemed consurtant
Institute of Engineering Science and rechnol"r, namely Indian
='{
h.q
ahib;-*, Department of civii engineering, to
overcome
Jrlbonar r.e pra,t s,iidtd ,"o., ii,pr",.,tution
=l
_a :??:.t #,i:i[:ilX*ril::;l:.**, "o.p6*nt,
,i..

'q

fl Geotechnicar exproration and Non-destructive

q

#:;.U.T#,i:H:t}t#tfi:#iltr1i1,11"
ETi,

testing
_ iitfi;
-i
rt

As per our letter dated 24'04'2021, we have

already submitted the Non-destructive testing
=l the Geotechnical exploration report, inspection report. But for
for which started on 13.0g.20 zt iiended
we received the hard copy of thi Reportonly on ,r.or.rorr,
=\ t onz+.}g.ZOit.
-{t Hence we are submitting the original
copy of the Report as soon as we received the
,*til
.fim
same.
ffi Since there is a situation of excess time
-fl :itt
you to grant us extension of time for
taking in this matter due to covid protocols,
completiig the work.
we eamestly request
,ail
,, if
-- :,ii*t

Thanking you,
.}j

-{
{ Yours Faithfully

Fi
I
F, - L .r-i_] Lng.ireers pvt. Ltd. /
.
F{
I

d
,l
-
irect or
.$i^V
D

il
I

*{ --b>q/\
Enclo: original Soil Investigation Report. 'Y
h{
I

-
{
CONSUUTANTS AIICHITECTS BUILDE,RS ENGINE,E,RS
ht
-i
=4
.'

-r',
=

t
=

\
= A
=t REPORT OI{
\r SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONS
-
pnopoSno too
-r
=J w.B.sJc-F.L. tN rnr, nrsrrucr or soutH z+ pnncaN.ls.

-
-
-l .U
=

-.-{r
IJ
=

CLTENI
-
\r CAB EhIGTI\{EERS PRIVATE LIMITED
=c lC, Everest House, 46C, Chowringhee Rond,
Kolkata - 700 071.

]}
.C
-
:C
-
cQ]{suL'.rANT
-
- ASSOCIATED EI{GII\EERING SERVICES
51, MAIN ROAD, KALIANIBAS,
r\ NONA- C I_I-ANDANI-PT]KIJR,
P .O .
d
!+ BARRACKPORE. I(OLKATA - 7OOI22,
=e
\\ .G

-
-*
-lF
\
_/'
a
-= -
a
-=
.,
_=
-
-1 J
E
A
- REPORT ON
t SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
=
PROPOSED IOO MT. ICE PLANT AT FREZERGUNJ FOR BENFISH,
W.B.S.F.C.F.L. IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
-
Q
J

>
-

.n{ coNl'ENTS SHI,ET NO.

=

TIl A. TriXT
=
I.
-=: INTRODUCTION I
2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES . I
- 3. CEOLOGY OF BENGAL & THE AREA UNDER CONSIDERATTON r -3
-r
=IJ .I. DESICN OF SOIL EXPLORATION {-- il
=
5. STiB-SOIL CHARACTERISTICS I I _ 13
- 6. DISCLISSION OI\ FOTINDATION ASPECTS I3
1 IIEARING CAPACIT\/ OF VARIOtTS t-\,pE OF SHALLOW FDt\. r{ - 15
8. SI1'[TLEMENT oli \,'ARIotlS TYPE oF SHALLOW FDN. 15 - 17

L-
*:
=J
9. COMBINATION OF LOAD & SETT"LEMENT CRITERION ..,....... 17 - 18
10. BORED CAST-Ii\-SITTI PILE FOT]NDATION ..i....... l9 -2rl
:
=\.r
*=J I l. RECOI\{ 1}T EN DATION AND CONCLUDING REMARI(S
-? 25
. . . r . . r . ..

*
L-,_

=J
Er
= B. AI\NEXURES
=t7
:
-
a
h, l. SIl-E PHOTOGRAPH ......r... A-01-oc-0
=r
e )
h, LOCATION PLAN .......... A - |
* BORE LOGS ...r....r. A-21'OA-6
ht 3.

{. STiB-SOIL PROFILE
-*t
*
5. 'N' VALUE \/S. DIrPTll PLOT
a a a a a a a

..'......r A - 8 J'O ,\ - 9
a aa r
L _7
I t

= 6. PAITTICLE SI ZE DISTRI BUTIO\ (-TJtTVES ...r...... A - l0 To A - I6

1.,
=qr
=
7. DIRECT SI-I EAR TEST .,,r...... A- lTTO A-21
r> 8. CONSOLIDATION GRAPH ....... r.. A - 22 TO ,\ - 26

ry 9. MOHR'S CIRCLE PLOT

STIMN{ARY OF TEST RESIJLTS
..,..,7.e.
r.........
A- 27 T',O,{-31

ry
10. A - 32 TO A -- 4l

aa
==

trr,
=h.r
ry
r>
il.t
 ,tsso( l-\ t t-D ITNGINTERING SERVICES

1 LNTNODUCTION:

ln connection with the construction of a proposed 100 MT. lce Plantat Frezergunj for
BENFISH, W.B.S.F.C.F.L. in the District of South 24 Parganas, necessary soil
investigation work was assigned to M/S. Associated Engineering Services by "CAB
ENGINEERS PRIVATE L!M!TED", vide verbal order dated : 10.08.2021. The work
at the field was started on 13.08.21 and wa! completed on 18.08.21. This was
followed by laboratory testing of soil samples collected from the field and preparation
of this final report.

2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:

The aim of the present study was to bring out the stratigraphy, strength characteristics
of the sub soil and hydrology of the site, by conducting borehole studies
including in - situ tests and laboratory investigations. The findings were to applied
for realistic selection and design of suitable foundation system for the construction of
100 MT. lce P|ant at Frezergunj.

-i
=l)
=

--.=
3 GEOLOGY OF BENGAL AND THE AREA UNDER CONSIDERATION:
---
-rr.
=J
=
The hilly region in the north comprising the district of Darjeeling is cut through by deep
==
gorges of the Teesta which flows from north to south between mountainous banks
-=r- rising two to three kilometres above the stream. The Teesta on debouching into the
=a plains South of Darjeeling at Sevoke, flows in a mighty stream on straight line towards

- the south east until it pours its waters into the Brahamaputra in Bangladesh. Other
rivers, smaller than the Teesta, rising in the Himalayas are Jaldhaka, the Torsha, The
-=+ra
=
Sankosh and the Raidak. Of thete the Torsha is the most turbulent. These rivers,
=
= carrying the back of the monsoon waters of the huge catchment area of the
+--
- Himalayas. During the dry season they are navigable in the plains belorry. The
il
il
Mahananda rises from springs in the Dow Hills forest, below Darjeeling town falls in
the spectacular cascade named Pagla-Jhora into the sloping plains of southern
Darjeeling district and fed by three other smaller rivers the Mahanadi, the Balason, and
E:)
h
il-
E-
the Machi runs a zig-zag course through Malda District into the Padma in Bangladesh.
The central region is watered by the Mdhananda as well as such rivers arising in the
plains as the Tangan. the Punarbhava and the Atrai the former two Combine theif

h
Fb
F\\
 ASSOC'I \TED ENGINEERING SERVICES

streams and flow into the Mahananda and the Atrai flows into the Padma in

Bangladesh. The Southern region is served by two river systems. One for plateau and
the plains west of the Gangetic delta and the other for the gangetic delta itself. ln the
former atea, a number of rivers originating in the western plateau flow down in a south
easterly direction and join the Bhagirathi, the main westerly channel of the Ganga

? moving down to the estuary of the Bay of Bengal. Of these the north most is the

T Mayurakshi, which is fed by tributaries Brahmani, Dwaraka, Bakreswar and Kopai. A

little of the south the river Ajoy rising in the hills of Bihar, flows down the plateau fringe,
T marking the boundary between Bankura and Birbhum districts and joins the Bhagirathi

T
rt
at Katwa. Three other small streams Khari, Banka and Behula were one distributaries

r of Damodar, but are now meandering streams The biggest river of the plateau fringe,

T
-I
a
the Damodar, also rising in the Bihar hills runs down in an easterly course until it takes
a turn to the south and flows into the Hooghly river. Hooghly river is called as 'River of
it
Sorrows'.
-!t
-r
-a Further south is the Rupnarayan made up of two streams, Dwarakeswar and Silai or

-t Silabati. lts joins the Hooghly near the estuary as the Haldia and its impressive width
up to the Kolaghat is due to the tidal action on estuary. Still further south are the
=r
-\
Kansabati or Kasai and the Subarnarekha, the latter rising in the Orissa hills and

ilry
=P striking the boundary between the states of Orissa'and West tsengal.
ln the remainder of the southern region, the main channel of Ganga called Padma
+ runs into Bangladesh where it joins to Brahmaputra and the two rivers runs into one of

+
h.
the West Bengal is strategically placed with three international frontiers
Nepal and Bhutan. A hinge between the bulk of lndian territory and the north
- Bangladesh,
- east of
the country, West Bengal is located at 210 31' and 270 14' North Latitude at the head
n*- of the Bay of Bengal and 860 35' and 890 53' East longitude, with the Tropic of Cancer
n-- running through it.
t-. The great Himalayas start a distance of only 300 miles from the Bay of Bengal and the
t-- coastal tropical rain forest, sundarbans Physiography The entire Bengal basin is that
part of the great lndian shield, which approximately to the east of longitude 870 E,

h
=
disappear,s under alluvium. West of it are a number of intracratonic Gondwana basins
along the damodar valley; a few exposures of early Tertiary Age near Baripada (in

il
E-
=t-q
Orissa) and Durgapur and the late Mesozoic volcanics of the Rajmahal hills.
It is only in the shillong plateau of Meghalaya, which faces the Garo - Rajmahal gap
through which the Ganga and its tributaries flow into the sea, that the Archaean and
Cambriasn Shield crops out again. Geophysical surveys and deep drillings have
?-3 Pre -
- AS SOC I.\TE D ENGII\JIIERNG SERVICES
=a
=-.
1-.. detected buried dornal structures of varying dimensions below the altuvium in
=- Medinipur, Galsi (in Burdwan) and Jangipur (in Murshidabad) areas. They are flanked

h
-

\
by a zone of en echelon faults. Otheruise West Bengal's shelf area is practically
tectonically undisturbed. lt dips to the south - east very gently, creating the thrust for
ilt the fluvial drift in the Gangetic Delta.
t..l A zone of flexure, which passes along the Calcutta - Ranaghat areas and below, very
h likely represents the huge of the Bengal basin. lt is only to the east of the callcutta

b region that the sea receded as late as Pleistocene times. This is perhaps one of the

t- factors keeping West Bengal out of the recent projections of the 'greenhouse effect'

L
!.'
boding more ill for Bangladesh through the warming of the entire macro region and the
flooding of extensive areas of the most low - lying deltaic tracts of the south - east of
the border absin, in the 21 st century.
West Bengal's natural hazards, relatively new in geohistorical terms, are more due to

H the problems of a moribund delts. The Bengal plain did not originate only in sedimental

1-' deposition on a shallow continental shelf by the Ganga - Brahmaputra Fluvial system.
ln many areas, the sea and a presumably vast lacustrine or swampy area in the north
have receded to be, then, raised up in a complex, physiographic way.

E The area under consideration belongs to the southern part of the largest delta of the
world. This delta was formed by the deposits from innumerable river systems in the

h
l-
past. Some originated from large track of Himalayan Mountains, some from the old
peninsular on the West and some from Garo Hills on the East. The long stretch of the
Indo-Gangetic Alluvial plains culminated in to the great delta of Bengal, formed and

IJ extended southwards gradually by the river systems of mighty Ganga-Brahmaputra

and their tributaries. The sub-surface deposits in the region thus represent typical

H deltaic characters comprising sands, silts and clays with some sporadic organic
concentrations down to great depths.
I.' To be precise, it can be mentioned that this region contains two types of deposits as

h
follows

tt
i) The normal silty clay deposits formed under back swamp condition, which
cover most of the area.
ii) The sandy river belt deposits left by the ancient meandering rivers which
occurs in stretches.

H
h,
 ,ASSOC' t \TI-D ENGINEERING SERVICES

40 DESIGN OF SOIL EXPLORATION:

The programme of soii exploration work as drawn by the client consisted of the
following:

4.1 Field lnvestiqation:

The field investigation at the site comprising sinking of Five (5) nos. of bore hole
each are of 22.00 m deep below the existing ground level. The location plan for bore

-3 holes is shown in sheet no. A- 1. Thefield bore logs are shown in sheet no. A -2lo
A - 6. The following were the different parts of field lnvestigation.
-:,
AI 42 Sinking of bore holes :
t!I
Auger and Bentonite Mud Drilling (B.M.D) technique was adopted for advancing the
borehole through the sub-soil. Hand auger was operated in the boreholes at first up
to a maximum depth of 1.50 m after which Bentonite Mud Drilling was started. ln
B.M.D. a suitable cutter of appropriate design and diameter 150 mm was attached to
a string of G.l. pipes through which bentonite slurry was continuously pumped in the
bore hole while the drill string was rotated manually. The bentonite by virtue of its
density and thixotropy stabilised the borehole and prevented sand blowing, soft soil
flow and sedimentation. The operation was carefully monitored using specially
trained skilled workmen under technical supervision of M/S. ASSOCIATED
ENGINEERING SERVICES. Thus the natural characteristics of the sub-soil were not
disturbed and the firm base of the borehole could be reached for un-disturbed soil
sampling and conduction of standard penetration tests.

4.3 Collection of Un-disturbed samples:

Un-disturbed samples were collected as per specifications given in lS: 1892-1979.
After recovery of the samples, the sample tubes were properly sealed at both ends
by wax, marked and sent for laboratory testing.

4.4 Standard Penetration Test:

The standard penetration test is a well established and unsophisticated method,
which was developed in the United States around 1925. lt has since undergone
refinements with respect to equipment and testing procedure. The testing procedure
varies in different parts of the world. Therefore standardisation of SPT was essential
!!,
ASSOI i\TED ENGINEERII{G SERVICES
Iiir I

in order to facilitate the comparison of results from different investigations. The

f,
\D equipment is simple, relatively inexpensive and rugged. Another advantage is that
lrr, representative but disturbed soil samples are obtained. The reliability of the method
h\ and the accuracy of the result depend on the experience and care of the engineer /
, engineering supervisor on site. t
.! A split barrel sampler is driven from the bottom of a pre-bored hole into the soil by
lhr
t means of a 63.5 kg hammer, dropped freely from a height of 0.76 m. The diameter of

lD the prebored hole varies normally between 60 and 200 mm. lf the hole does not stay

t open by itself, casing or drilling mud should be used. The sampler is first driven to a
depth of 15 cm below the bottom of the pre-bored hole, then the number of blows
- required to drive the sampler another 30 cm into the soil, the so called N30 count, is

- recorded. The rods used for driving the sampler should have sufficient stiffness. The
quality of test results depends on several factors, such as actual energy delivered to
-
5
:

the head of the drill rod, the dynamic properties (impedance) of" the drill rod, the
hr method of drilling and bore hole stabilisation. The SPT is generally conducted in all
types of deposit . But the SPT can be difficult to perform in loose sands and silts
-r
:t
a
L. below the ground water level, as the bore hole can collapse and disturb the soil to be
=-t tested. The following factors can affect the test results : nature of the drilling fluid in
=

the bore hole, diameter of the bore hole, the configuration of the sampling spoon and
-
lr
.t the frequency of delivery of the hammer blows. Therefore, it should be noted that
-

-\ drilling and stabilisation of the bore hole must be carried out with care. The
*=t,
L measured N-value (blows / 0.30 m) is so-called standard penetration resistance of

=
=, the soil. The penetration resistance is influenced by the stress conditions at the
- depth of test. Peck et al. (1974) proposed, based on settlement observations of
1-, footings, the following relationship for correction of confinement pressure.. The
+-, measured N value is to be multiplied by a correction factor Cr.r to obtain a reference
+-. value, Nr, corresponding to an effective overburden stress of 1Aftz (approximately
+-.
I
107 kpa).
?Tr
1U
Thus Nr = N. Cr,r
+
f.--
\
Where, CH is a stress correction factor.
t,
t-?t
il Again Cu = 0.77. logro (201p'l

h
-
+-
Where p' is the effective overburden pressure.
The second correction over the corrected value of Nr is due to fine or silty sand
below water table.
*d
*
E-t
il>
+-, ASSOCI {TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES
1=
+- The reason for this correction is that
foi a measdred N gieater than 15 cm, the
sand
is medium dense or denser. The means that when
the hammer is dropped to drive

i-,
=-
\
the tube cause the sand to dilate, where water is present,
negative pore pressures to be developed.
this dilation causes
f!
For relatively clean sand, these pore water pressures
il-, the next blow is applied' For sand, which rras iis pore
are fully dissipated by the time
space parily blocked by silts or
+-- clays or is a very fine sand, the rate at which these
negative pore water pressures
l-; dissipates may very much lower. Therefore they may
not be fully dissipated by the
time, the next blow is applied a second or so latter.

L built up negative pore water pressures as the

This may mean that there is a
brows are appried.
since' there has been no change in total stress a reduction
of pore water pressure

L (even though it is temporary) must lead to

a temporary increase
Since the greater the effective stress, the greater
tested' Therefore as the strength increase has only
in effective stress.
is the strength of the material being
[:' been caused temporarily
1- because of dilation effects. lt must be accounted
for by the measured ,N, value. Thus
for this correction, the foilowing facts have been
kept in mind.
. Sand layer must be always below the water table.
.
H o
'N' value must be greater than 15.
Have reduced permeability.
f't The resistance (N30) has been correlated with the consistency
[> the relative density of non cohesive soils can be classified
of clayey soil and also
as shown below in table -
\ 1 , Brooms (1986).

FOR SAND AND GRAVEL

u Relative
!.- Very Loose Medium Dense Very

L density
Nso blows
loose
<4 < 4 - 10 10 - 30 30 I
50
Dense.

1'= / 0.30 m

l't
r>
f.
r>
Consistency
r\3o prows/
I
VerySoF
.2 i 2_4 | +_g
Medium stiff
I - 16
Very Stiff.
16-32
o.3om i
llr i i

l->
f->
F.
 ASSOC'I {TED E\GINEERING SERVICES

The test is mainly used to estimate

the relative stiffness and strength
(bearing
capacity) of soils' Deformation characteristics
of granular soils can be estimated from
empirical correlations, Peck et. Al. (1974).lt
is also possible to get some indications
from sPT of the shear strength in cohesive
soils. The spr used frequenly for the
T evaluation of the liquefaction potential
=i of water saturated, loose sands and silts
in
-, seismic areas, Seed and De Alba (19g6).
=
hi\
For this work,the method used for spr is as per rs:2131
='
-\ - 1gg1.
,-
= 4'5 ,

-,
: After each standard penetration test, sufficient
quantities of disturbed samples were
collected from split spoon sampler. Disturbed
- samples were atso coltected from auger
when it was operated. These samples were
- preserved in the polythene packets,
labelled properly and sent to laboratory
for identification and testing.

l' 46 :

- Laboratory tests have been conducted

as per IS specifications on soil samples
l}
\.
(Disturbed and Un_disturbed) to determine
the foilowing properties.
J
i) tent
The natural moisture content of soil is determined
from samples taken in the field
and placed in a container which is then sealed
-\ J to prevent loss of moisture by
\.
=
evaporation.
-{ luable in
borinqs.
-,
E
Generally, 100 gm of soil is enough to determine
the moisture content of fine
grained soils' Larger samples are required
-
I for soils that contain gravel. Normally,
fh{
*-- moisture content samples are placed in metal
dishes (canisters) that have tight
t
?.\r fitting covers' when the moisture content test

L
Ev is to be performed within 1 day after
the sample is obtained, sealing of the container
[.Y is not required. lf a longer time
t.-
tt
interval will elapse between sampling and
testing, the containers may be sealed.
Natural moisture content have been determined
F\
I

It (Part 2)
in the laboratory as per ls. 2720
- 1973.
f.*.
It
Fr ii)

f\
I

1J
soil Bulk density is defined as the ratio of
the mass of dry solids to the bulk volume

b
F\
iJ
of the soil occupied by those dry solids
The bulk volume includes the vorume of

\
lt
 ASSOC I \ iED ENGINEERING SERVICES

the solids and the pore spac.. Brlk d.rritu ir n..d.d for .onu".tino *rtg
percentage bv weiqht to content bv volume. for calculatinq porositv and void
ratio when the particle densitv is known. and for estimatinq the weiqht of a
volume of soil too larqe to weight convenientlv.
The dry density = Bulk density I { 1 + moisture content % )

iii) Particle Size Distribution

By the term particle size distribution, we mean sieve and hydrometer analysis.
Particle size distribution test is performed to determine the percentage of different
grain sizes contained within a soil.,The mechanical.or sieve analysis is performed
to determine the distribution of the coarser, larger sized particles and the
hydrometer method is used to determine the distribution of the finer particles.
The distribution of different qrain sizes affects the enqineerino properties of
soil. Grain size analvsis provides the qrain size distribution. and it is required
in classifving the soil.
The test has been performed in the laboratory as per 1S: 2720 (Part 4) - 1985
t-

=-rLT
iv) Atterberq Limits
-rq , ln 1911, the Swedish soil scientistAlbertAtterberg (1846-1916) developed a series
-\q .t, of tests to evaluate the relationship between moisture content and soil consistency
=
\- (Atterberg, 1911; Blackall, 1952). Then, in the 1930,s, Karl Terzaghi and Arthur
Casagrande adapted these tests for civil engineering purpose, and they soon
- ,
became a routine part of Geotechnical engineering. This series includes three
#-
=-
separate tests: the liquid limit test, the plastic limit test, and the shrinkage limit test.
=--t
-E

Together they are known as the Atterberg limits test (ASTM D427 and D4318).
+{
-
The liquid limit and plastic limit tests are routinely performed in many soil
:-:-
mechanics laboratories. However, the shrinkage limit test is less useful, and is
-
j-

rarely performed by civil engineers. Shrinkage limit test is very much required in
:
-- finding the expansiveness of soil. ln our laboratory, liquid limit and plastic limit tests
:I
-= have been done as per lS'. 2720 (Part 5) - 1985. As per soil strata encountered in
t the field, we observed that the basic material is sand and silt and thus no shrinkage
-r=-
, property will be observed. Thus considering of no use we have discarded shrinkage
-
) limit test.
.-:
-.t
=_! I
=
-rrf d
.=
-\\r
=l\
=,
:!
 ASSOC I.{TED ENGINEERING SERVICES

v)

The ratio of the unit weight of a material to the unit weight of distilled water
at 40C is
a common definition of specific gravity. Soil specific gravities, however, are
normally referred to the weight of water at 200C. ln itself, the specific gravity
is not
an index property of a soil. lt is, however, required for determination of the unit
!
weight of soil and in many computations.
lues from 2.2 to 3.S most soils have
specific qravitv from 2.60 to 2.90. Anv values outside of this latter ranse
shoutd be made to verifv the value.
where specific values are not available. the fo[owino can be assumed for
local soils :
Sand and gravels : 2.65
Silts and clay :2.78
ln our laboratory test, specific gravity has been determined as per lS:2720 (part
3/
Sec 2) - 1980.

vi) shear strenqth parameters bv Unconfined compression test

The primary purpose of this test is to determine the unconfined compressive
strength , which is then used to calculate the unconfined cohesion of clayey
soil.
The unconfined compressive strength (qr) is defined as the compressive stress
at
which an unconfined cylindrical specimen of soil will fail in a simple compression
test' ln addition, in this test method, the unconfined compressive strength is taken
as the maximum load attained per unit area, or the load per unit area at 15
% axial
strain, whichever occurs first during the performance of a test.
For soils, the undrained shear strength (sr) is necessary for the determination
of
the bearing capacity of foundations, dams etc. The undrained shear strength (su)
of
clays is commonly determined from an unconfined compression test. The
undrained shear strength (su) of a cohesive soil is equal to one-half
the unconfined
compressive strength (qr) when the soil is under the g 0o condition ({
= = the angle
of internal friction). The most critical condition for the soil usually occurs
immediately after construction, which represents undrained conditions,
when the
undrained shear strength is basically equal to the cohesion (c). This
is expressed
as s, = c = q" I 2._Then, as time passes, ihe pore water in the soil
slowly
dissipates, and the intergranular stress increases, so
that the drained shear
strength (s)' given by s = c + o'tan
$, must be used. where o, = intergranurar
 AS SOC I.\T E D ENGINEERNG SE,RVICES 10

pressure acting perpendicular to the shear plane; and o' = (o - u), o = total
pressure, and u = pore water pressure; c and $ are drained shear strength
parameters. ln our laboratory, the unconfined compression test we generally find
out as per lS - 2720 (Part 10) - 1973.

vii) Shear strenqth parameters bv Direct Shear test.

Direct shear test have been done as per lS 2720 (Part - Xlll). Consolidated drained
test condition in direct shear test have been done by the application of normal stress

r:,
-
E
increments for consolidation of the sample. When the consolidation has completely

g?
-
occurred, the shear test has been done at a strain of 1.25 mm / min. A minimum of

fr.a
= three test have been performed on separate specimens of the same density and at
-
=>
flI different normal stress. The direct shear test has the advantage of being simple and
h=, inexpensive. lt is especially usefulfor obtaining the drained strength of sandy soils. lt
-
il

also can be used with clays, but produces less reliable results because it is difficult to
='!r
il

fully saturate the sample and because we have no way of controlling the drainage
=>

il
= conditions other than varying the speed of the test.

+3
:::
ry
:
-
-E
viii) Un-consolidated Un-drained Test
This test has been perforrned .for the determination of compressive strength of
-I
:::
-hr
saturated cohesive soil in a triaxial compression apparatus under conditions in which
*J the cell pressure is maintained constant and thereby no change in the total water
=
=-a content of the specimen. The test has been performed for a specimen of 38mm
-
=J
+t
:
diameter and a height of 76mm. The test we generally performed in the laboratory as

-r per lS: 2720 (Part 1 1) - 1971 (Reaffirmed 1978).

=h,
il
-
ix) Com pressibilitv characteristicg.
Consolidation tests were conducted on the samples 60 mm dia. And 20 mm thick in
the odometer under incremental loading and two way drainage, On sandy silt / silty
E
- -
E. sand samples, these tests were not conducted as it was not possible to prepare test
specimen and further due to the fact that the settlement of the granular deposits will
:
-=r be very rapid under load. Further, in case of granular deposits, the bearing capacity

- values are empirically determined (on the basis of 'N' values and also Q"o) limiting the

-r
*:
::]- settlement as permissible level for different types of foundations. As in the case of

-t =- cohesive deposits, the settlement of the structure due to consolidation (immediate

E-r and long term) of the cohesive deposit need be critically checked, to evaluate the
t>
i-J
 ASSOC I {TED ENGINEERII.{G SERVICES

settlement potentials and thus consolidation tests were conducted only on cohesive

samples. Consolidation tests we generally performed in the laboratory as per lS:

2720 (Part 15) - 19Bo

5 SUB - SOIL CHARECTERISTICS:

5.1.0. The sub-soil of the location as revealed by the present investigation may be broadly
divided in the following strata:

5.1.1. STRATUM -I
This stratum is a Filled up soil consisting of light yellowish grey clayey silt with
kankars etc. This layer started from the existing ground level and continued up to a
maximum depth of 0.50 m below the existing ground level. The average thickness of
this layer may be taken as 0.50 m approximately. This layer is a heterogeneous
filling in nature. Engineering parameters of this layer are very unpredictable. Thus
this layer is always to be neglected for any type of foundation design. The bulk
density of this layer may be taken as 1.80 t / m3 on an average.

5.1.2 STRATUM - II

This stratum consisting of Very soft to soft light bluish / blackish grey silty clay /
clayey silt. Fine sand intrusion observed at 4.50 m depth. This layer started at a
minimum depth of 0.50 m below the existing ground level and continued up to a
maximum depth of 5.00 m below the existing ground level. The average thickness of
this stratum may be take,t a:r 4.50 m approximately. This layer is basically a
cohesive layer having only cohesion (c) but no or a little angle of internal friction.
This layer is high plasticity in character. The average 'N' value of this layer may be
taken as 3. As per lS classification this layer may be named as CH type. The
average un-confined cohesion value of this layer may be taken as 2.20 t/m2. This
layer will undergo long term consolidation settlement under imposed load if any. The
coefficient of volume compressibility of soil (mu) for this layer may be taken as 0.06
cm2lkg for a pressure range of 0.50 kg/cm2 to 1.00 kg/cm2. The bulk density of this
layer may be taken as 1.81 t / m3 on an average.
-r<l ASSOC I.\TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES
=!
==a
t2

-
-i
-C
=a
- 5.1.3 STRATUM - III
--:a
-, This stratum consisting of Medium light bluish / silver grey clayey sandy silt / silty fine

-.t
=Y
=( sand with mica. This layer started at a minimum depth of 5.00 m below the existing
ground level and continued up to a maximqm depth of 11.00 m below the existing
-t,
:l*
=f ground level. The average thickness of this stratum may be taken as 6.00 m
a non-cohesive layer having only angle
=l
=-
approximately. This layer is basically
internal friction (Q) but no or a little cohesion. The layer is also non plastic in nature.
of

=l
-,
The average 'N' value of this layer may be taken as 17. After correction for over
=l burden pressure and dilatancy effect, the corrected 'N' value of this layer may be
taken as 17. From direct shear test result, the angle of internal friction (0) of this layer
-=E-r
l
may be taken as 320 on an average. As per lS classification this layer may be named
€+
5t as SM type. The relative density (D,.) of this layer may be taken as 45%. The
-L
gY
ill
poison's ratio (pr) of this layer may be taken as 0.30. The deformation modulus of soil
.{.
3P (Eo) for this layer may be taken as 143 kg/cm2. This layer will undergo immediate
=1 t.
-l
settlement under imposed load if any. The bulk density of soil for this layer may be
5?
-"= |
taken as 1.85 t / m3 on an average.
€(
-, 5.1 .4 STRATUM - IV
g
*rr This stratum consisting of Medium to stiff light bluish grey sandy silty clay I sandy
-
+; clayey silt. This layer started at a minimum depth of 11.00 m below the existing

+.
-il-,
ground level and continued up to a maximum depth of 16.00 m below the existing
ground level. The average thickness of this stratum rnay be taken as 5.00 m
approximately. This layer is basically a cohesive layer having only cohesion (c) with

+.
5
a little angle of internal f iction (S). Due to small value of (0) it can be neglected
during calculation. This layer is intermediate plasticity in character. The average 'N'
.t{
+> value of this layer may be taken as 14. As per lS classification this layer may be

h
1>
named as Cl type. The average un-confined cohesion value of this layer may be
taken as 5.80 t/m2. This layer will undergo long term consolidation settlement under
imposed load if any. The coefficient of volume compressibility of soil (m,) for this
h3 layer may be taken as 0.04 cm2lkg for a pressure range of 0.50 kg/cm2 to 1.00

kg/cm2. The bulk density of this layer may be taken as 1.84 t / m3 on an average.

+t
=-l
+>
 ASSOCI.{TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES l3

515 STRATUM-V
This stratum consisting of Soft to medium light bluish / blackish grey silty clay /
clayey silt. Fine sand intrusion observed at lower depth within the deposit. This layer
started at a minimum depth of 16.00 m below the existing ground level and
continued up to the maximum depth of exploration i.e. 22.00 m below the existing
ground level. The average thickness of this stratum may be taken as 6.00 m
approximately. This layer is basically a cohesive layer having only cohesion (c) with
a little angle of internal friction (0). Due to small value of (0) it can be neglected
during calculation. This layer is intermediate plasticity in character. The average 'N'
value of this layer may be taken as 10. As per lS classification this layer may be
named as Cl type. The average un-confined cohesion value of this layer may be
taken as 4.10 Um2. This layer will undergo long term consolidation settlement under
imposed load if any. The coefficient of volume compressibility of soil (m,) for this
layer may be taken as 0.05 cm2lkg for a pressure range of 0.50 kg/cm2 to 1.00
kg/cm2. The bulk density of this layer may be taken as 1.82 t / m3 on an average.

Standi,nq WqtelLevel
The standing water level at the borehole location during August '2A21' was found at
1.00 m on an average below the existing ground level. But for bearing capacity
calculation, it is wise to take at ground as water table may rise any time at ground
during flash flood I monsoon.

6. DISCUSSION ON FOUNDATION ASPECTS:

The aim of our geotechnical studies at this site is to observe the soil layers of the site
alonq with qeotechnical enqineo-rinq datas and to h
settlement criteria of different shallow foundations and pile capacities considerinq
different diameter as a deep foundation forthe 100 MT. lce Plant. Calculations of
both tvpes of foundations are qiven here in below as a reference. We have
calculated the bearinq capacity and settlement of various tvpes of shallow foundation
restinq at 1.50 m below the existinq ground level. Further for deep foundation we
have considered different diameter (450 mm & 500 mm) of Bored cast-in-situ pile
resting at 10.00 m below the existinq ground level having a cut off lenqth of 1.50 m.
Calculations are given here in below.
 AS S L)C' i.\TE D EN GIN E,ERING SERVICES 14

7 BEARTNG CAPACITY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS

RESTING AT {.50 M. BELOW THE EXISTING GROUND LEVEL'

At this site, shallow foundation either isolated square or strip footings are proposed
to be rested at a depth of '1.50 m below the existing ground level i.e. within stratum -
ll which is a very soft to soft grey silty clay layer and is basically a cohesive layer. As
the layer is cohesive, the ultimate net bearirig capacity of this stratum is given by
\.t
-
(refer to lS: 6403 - 1981).
={
-r{ qo = C N. S. d. i" Where, C = Cohesion.
=I
h{
Nc = Terzaghi's Bearing capacity factor and found out from table - 1 of lS: 6403 -

=I 1981.
Sc = ShaPe factor and found out from Table - 2 of lS: 6403 - 1981 .

-
d" = Depth factor and found out from Cl : 5.1 .2.2 of lS : 6403 - 1981 .

= t
-T,f
:rd

ic = lnclination factor and found out from Cl : 5"1 .2'3 of lS : 6403 - 1981'
=V
Different types of shallow foundations such as isolated square footings and strip
footings have been chosen for bearing capacity calculation. Different sizes are
given herein
considered in this respect. The values of safe net bearing capacity are
below a tabular form (table 1). A sample calculation is also presented following
-
the table - 1.

TABLE _ 1

Type of Base Size Depth of Ultimate Factor of Safe net

footing (M) foundation bearing safety bearing

(M) capacity capacity

lsolated 150x150m 1.50 m 17.64 1lm2 2.5 07.05 t I mz

Square
-do- -do 1690tImZ 2.5 06.76 t I m2

-do- 2.50 x 2.50 m -do- 16.46 t I m2 2.5 06.58 t lmt

-do 3.00x300m -do 16.17 | I m2 2.5 06 46t lmz

!solated 150m 1.50 m 13 56 t Im2 2.5 05 42tIm' i

Strip I

-do- 2.00 m -do- 13.00 t I m2 2.5 05.20 t I m2

-do- 250m -do- 12.66 t lm2 2.5 05.06 t lm'

-do 300m -do 12 43 t lm2 25 04.97 t I m2

 ASSOC I.\TED ENGINEERING SERVICES

Sample calculation of bearinq capacitv:

i) Tvpe of footinq: lsolated Souare of size 2.0 m x 2.0 m'

Consider:
i) Water table is at G.L. for the worst case.
ii) Width of foundation, B = 2.0 m. i
Tq iii) Depth of foundation, dt = '1.50 m below the existing ground level.
={
--l-
iv) 'y' of stratum - II = 1.81t / m3.
=J
=l

v) ll
-l
=l 'C' of stratum - = 2.201I m2
-{a
=r

ry
-l

=i

= Stratum considered = Stratum - ll.

Take average cohesion, 'C' = 2.20I I m2-

:E
.-
E-,r
& 0 = 00, referring to lS: 6403 - 1981 '

=-
-, Nc = 5.14, Sc = 1'30,
*
-\ii dc= 1+lO.2dtxtan (450+ +t2)jlB = 1+ (0.2 x 1.5x tan45o) 12.0
*=J

f_
-n = 1.15
i"= (1 - crl900 t2= 1.0 (Since, the loading is vertical, i.e. cr = 00)
f,.) )2

il+-
-\..
Therefore, the ultimate net bearing capacity,
qd = (2.2A x 5.14x 1.30 x 1,15 x 1.0) = 16.90 t lm2

fu^
*t
g\ Applying afactor of safetY of 2.5,

il+, Net safe bearing capacity = 16'90 / 2'5 = 6'76 tlm2

.L,

+" B SETTLEMENT OF VAruOUS YPES OF SHALL

il
1.50 M. BELOW THE EXISTING GROUND LEVEL:
At this site, shallow foundation either isolated square or strip footings are proposed
to be rested at a depth of 1.50 m below the existing ground level i.e. within stratum -
ll which is a very soft to soft grey silty clay layer and is basically a cohesive layer.
The extent of significant stress increased zone has been considered as 1.5 times the
width of respective foundation. The pressure bulbs for the sizes of footings
considered will penetrate maximum into clay layer - ll and sand layer - lll, As the clay
layer - tt is of cohesive layer, the layer will undergo consolidation settlement and
sand layer - lll is of non-cohesive layer the layer will undergo immediate settlement.
 ASSOC I \TED ENGINEERING SERVICES
16

consolidation setflement have been calculated by the formula

-
Sc=mrxApxH
Where, mv = Coefficient of volume decrease of soil.
H = Thickness of soil layer under compression.
Ap = lncrease of load intensily atHt2 due to superimposed load.
lmmediate settlement have been calculated by the formula
-
lmmediate settlements are calculated based on 'N' value and as per figure g of lS:
-
8009 (Part - l) - 1976.
For the present case, the average corrected 'N' value for sand layer - lll has been
considered as 17 & O = 320
Considering permissible settlement of isolated square and strip foundations as 75
mm, safe pressure over foundation (p) have been calculated and presented in a
tabular form in table no. * 2. A sample calculation is also given here for further work,
if any by the designer.

Table -2
Type of Base Size Depth of Maximum Safe pressure Suggested safe
footing (m) foundation Permissible against max. pressure
(m) settlement permissible From both shear
(mm ) settlement of failure &
75 mm settlement
criteria
lsolated 150x1.50m 1.50 m 75 23.14 t I m2 07.05 t I mz
Sq uare

-do 2.00x2A0m -do 75 1644tImz 06.76 t I m2

-do 2.50 x 2.50 m -do 75 12.39 t I m2 06.58 t I m2
-do- 3.00x300m -do- 75 11.36 t I m2 0646tIm2
lsolated 1.50 m 1.50 m 75 17.1 6 t I m2 05.42 t I m2
Strip
-do- 2.A0 m -do- 75 12.84 t I m2 05.20 t I m2
-do- 2.50 m -do 75 10.17t1m2 05.06 t I m2
-do 300rn j

I
-do 75 0967tIm2 04.97 t I m2
 ASSOC i\TED ENGINEERNG SERVICE,S l7

Sample Calculation of Settlement:

i) TvDe of footinq: lsolated Square of stze 2.0 m x 2.0 m.
Water table: Considered at G.L. for the worst case.
Extent of stress influence zone (pressure bulb) is up to 1,5 times the width of the
foundation = 1.5 x 2.0 m = 3.00 m below fgundation base.
Depth of foundation = '1.50 m below the existing ground level.
Compressible thickness of clay layer - ll = 3.00 m = 300 cm.
=l
b-{ Consolidation Settlement in stratum - ll
=I Considering 2:'1 load dispersion,
Ap at base of the foundation = p kg / cm2

Ap at3.00 m belowbase = [p x2.0 x2.0] ll2.O + 3.0]2 = 0.16 p kg/cm2

Average Ap at middle of compressible thickness Hr (within layer- ll)
= [p + 0.16 p] l2= 0.58 P kg / cm2.
and Hr = 300 cm.

-rr
=f
As per fig 12 of lS : 8009 (Part - l) 1976, applying Fox's curves for settlement
=,f
-l

of flexible footing, depth factor = 0.78, pore pressure correction factor = 0.70 and
rigidity factor = 0.80.
.'. Estimated corrected consolidation settlement in stratum - ll
(Sc)rr = 0.06 x 0.58 p x 300 x 0.70 x 0.80 x 0.78 = 4.56 p kg /cm2

.'.Total corrected settlement = (sltotar = 4.56 p kg / cm2.

To maintain compatibility condition for a maximum allowable settlement of 75 mm

i.e. 7.5 cm.
4.56p =7.5,.'. p= 1.644 kg/cm2 =16.44t1m2.

9. COMBINATION OF LOADS AND SETTLEMENT CRITERION FOR DESIGN OF

SHALLOW FOUNDATION:

i) As per lS: 1904 - 1986, foundations shall be proposed for the following
combination of loads.
a) Dead load + Live load.
b) Dead load + Live load + Wind load or Seismic ioad.
Dead load also includes the weight of column / wall footings, foundations, the
overlaying fill but excludes the weight of the displaced soil. Live loads from the floors
 ASSOC I.\TED ENGINE,ERNG SERVICES IB

as specified in lS: 875 shall be taken in proportioning and designing the foundation.

Where wind or Seismic load is less than 25o/o o'f that due to dead and live loads,
+
foundations may be so proportioned that pressure due to combination of dead live
+ wind load does not exceed the safe bearing capacity by more lhan 25o/o. When
seismic forces are considered, the safe bearing capacity shall be increased as
specified in clause 3.3.3. of lS: 1893 - 1975.

={
{ ii) Loads for settlement Analvsis:
=I As per clause 16.1 of lS: 1904 - 1986, for foundations resting on course grained
'or
cohesion less soil, the settlement shall be estimated corresponding to load
combination of dead + live + wind seismic, since in such soils settlements occur
in a very short Period of loading'
For fine grained soils i.e. cohesive deposits the settlement shall be estimated
corresponding to permanent loads, i.e. dead load and one half of the design live
load may be taken as being permanent.

ii i) Allowable maximum settlement. differential settlement' angular distortion:

The maximum settlement and angular distortion to be allowed as per lS: 1904 -
1986 for isolated foundations are shown in table-3. since, no such
recommendations have been made in lS code for continuous strip footing, table
- 3 may be followed for strip footing also without any significant error.
Table - 3
ISOLATED FOUNDAIIoNg
Sand & Hard ClaY Plastic Clay
:l
- SI Type of Maximum Differential Angular Maximum Drtterenttal Angular
Distortion Settlement Settlement
I
Distortion
- No. Structure Settlement Settlement I

-t
€ 1 For 50 mm 0 0015 L 1/666 75 mm 000151 I t/666
€ Reinforced
--\r
:E,, =,-.r^ concrete

:
,=
€t Structure

?"
L NOTE : The values given in the table may be taken only as a guide and the
It permissible setflement and differential settlement in each case should be decided as

?'" per requirements of the designer.

F.r L denotes the tength of deflected part of wall / raft or c / c distance hetween columns.

il
 ASSOCI.{TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES t9

10. BORED CAST- lN-slrU PILE FoR THE pRoposEp 100 MT.tcE pLANT:-
The tip of each bored pile is suggested to rest at 10.00 m below the existing
ground level. Different diameters (450 mm & 5OO mm nomina! diameter) have
been considered in this respect. The safe Vertical, Horizontal and Pull out
J capacities of different diameter of piles are giren in a tabutar form (Table - 4 &
-i
--
-\ t Table - 5) in section - 10 of this report. A Sample calculation is represented here
considering a 450 mm diameter nominal diameter Gast-in-situ bored pile having
-I
-l a cut-off length of 1.50 m and shaft length of 8.50 m as a reference for the
-? designer.

-
=*
-I

10.1 Tvpe of pile

=I Cast - in - situ bored pile (450 mm) is considered
=r 10.2 Cut - off level
here.

==-l
=_iq
- Cut-off level of each pile is considered as 1.50 m below the existing ground level.
:=f 10.3
=_t
_i
Nominal Diameter of pile
:€ f 450 mm nominal diameter is considered here in all cases.
:'-
-, 10.4 Average Sub-Soil Profile
For calculation of pile capacity, average Sub-Soil profiles are considered as shown in
Sheet No. 20.
10.5 Shaft lenqth of Pile
The tip length of pile is considered at 10.00 m depth below the existing ground i.e. the
bored length of pile is suggested as 10.00 m and shaft length of pile will be 8.50 m.
 20

ASSo)CIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES

E.G.L.

Yavs. = 1'80 t/m3

E
o
LN Filling layer.
ct

o.40 L/m 1'8Ltlm3

ts Yavs.=
O
q Nurn,= 3
Soft to medium
e
? silty clay. r.n t/*? Cavs. = 2'2O tlm'
o
tn cx, = 1.0
t E
O
q
co

3
il Ti+ t/rrfi Yavs. = 1'85 t/m
?
-P
Etl N avg'= L7, N cor' = Ll
ium silty sand. J
e
-o
3 2o t( =1'o
5,5? L/mz / '
P
lar "og'=
?
F
G
? / oesign = (320- 3o) = 290
o
b
-o
o ( Due to loosening effect of bored
= d pile during installation )
t
b+! Nq= L7.48, Ny= 20'096
= -' , 450mm
-n
D
l---il r

-
3
Y avs.= 1'84 t/ m
:'4 Medium to dense
N rrn, = L4

: F Cavs. = 5'80 t/ m'

--n-
.- c)
- sitty sand.
q
+a
=_-=
t

Yavs. = 1'82 t/m

N = t0
Medium to dense "rr,
? silty sand.
Cavs. = 4.L0 t/ m
()-
F

a a

(o

DETAIL FOR B.H. 1 tO 5'

AVERAGE SUB.SOIL PROFILE WITH PILE =

Site : FrezergunJ.
-E ASSOC I.\TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES 2l
-
:-
-!

Sample Calculation for determination of Safe Vertical Capacitv of a 450 mm dia

-t
=
=-r pile:
:=J
==
=\r Taken diameter of Pile = 450 mm.
=J in skin
==
- By Static formula as given in lS. 2911 Part.1/ Sec.2): 2010, Ultimate capacity
-? friction (Qr,) and in end bearing (Qor) are given,by,
E,
=-
=t Qsu = Xcr,.c.As + Xk.Po.Tan6.A"
=
-.=v Where, cr = reduction factor
=
C = average cohesion in respective stratum
-
=:,
= As = Surface area of Pile Shaft
=t po = Effective Overburden Pressure (limited to a maximum value corresponding
=
to the length = 15D)
=\.
=
=J

5
=\. E = Angle of wall friction between pile and soil in degrees = {
=-\
5=t k = Earth pressure co'efficient.
Er
And, Qu, = Apx ( N"' Cp + 0'5 x D xy' X Nr+ Po' Nq )
=,
=-.
g
=, Where, Ap = Cross Sectional area of Pile tip.
=\-
=, Nc = Bearing Capacity Factor.
=r.
Er
=,P Cp = Average Cohesion at Pile tiP.
=, D = Diameter of Pile Shaft'
-
=l y' = Effective Unit Weight of Soil at Pile toe'
:= l-
and Nq = Bearing Capacity factors depending upon the angle of internal
- Ny
-a
=r friction $ at toe.
=ra Po = Effective Overburden Pressure as said above'
=l-
rt
- Now, referring to the average Sub-Soil Profile in Page 20,

1-=r
Penetration of shaft:
+t
*t
=J
lnStratum l= Nil
r.
=*, ln Stratum ll = 3.50 m
*1,' ln Stratum lll = 5 00 m
+\
e.,
+L
+(
J-. ,.
==
+t
;i
 ASSOC I.\TED ENGINEERNG SERVICES 22

-!
-
-, a Skin Friction (450 mm dia of Pile):
-r , ln Stratum - ll (Cohesive laver\

-t
F
Skin friction of layer- ll = G x c x As
a.
-: =10x2.20xrrx045x3.50 '[

- = 10,88 MT.

-t ln Stratum - lll (Non-cohesive laver\

-g Skin friction of layer - lll = k x Poi x tan$ x A'

=-t
-
= 1.0 x 5,26x tan 290 x n x 0.45 x 5'00
-t = ZA.U MT.
-t
,J
=ii Total skin friction of layer - ll & lll
: _,
,\ = (10.88 + 20.61) = 31.49 MT.
.-__-

--_a End Bearinq (450 mm dia Pile) :

=ff
=-:-
Qb, = Ap x (0.5 x D x y'x NY + Poix Nq )
-<i
-
-_-_
I a
=nl4x(0.45)2x(0.5x0'45x0'85x20'096+5'26x17'48)
= 15.23 MT.
-l-
--{ + 15'23) MT' = 46'72MT'
.'.Ultimate capacity, Qu = Qsu + Qn' = (31'49
=r
-*-{
-I
-f- Applying a factor of safetY = 2'5,
-
Safe vertical capacity = (46.72 t 2'5) - Buoyant wt'
of Pile
--{
,
-I
=-{ = 18.68 - nl4 x0.452 x8.50 x (2.5 - 1'8)
:=l
:.,
-{\ = 1 8.68 - 0.94 = 17 .74 MT. SaY 18 MT'
_-r
=tr
=f
alI
=
i,
--\
{i=-\

lf
 ASSOCI \TED ENGINEERING SERVICES /)

Safe Horizontal Capacitv (450 mm dia of pile):

Safe horizontal capacity of pile is calculated following the method given in lS: 2911 (Part - II
Sec. 2) -2010 with the following known parameters.

i) Diameter of Pile (D) = 450 mrn.

ii) Grade of Reinforcement = Fe -500 D

i ii) GradeofConcrete=M-25
iv) Safe vertical load = 1B MT,

v) Head Condition = Fixed Head

vi) Unsupported Length of Pile (Lr) = Nil

E = Modulus of elasticity of Concrete = 5000 {(r.*) N / mm2= 50000 ^/(zs) kg/cm2

= )50000 kg/cmz = 2.5 x 106 tlmz

'l' of pile cross section = n I 64 x (0.45)a = 0.00201288 ma

As layer- ll is a normally loaded clay layer, thus kr (modulus of sub-grade reaction) will be the
guiding factor here.
Average value of 'C' for layer - ll = 2.20 tlmz.
Hence, 9u = 2x C = 2 x2.2A = 4.40 llm2 =44 kN/m2.

As per Table - 4 of (Cl C-2.2) of Annex C of lS 2911 (Part 1/ Sec 2) :2010

Kt = 7g20kn/m3 = 792t /m3, as pertable - 4 ofls-2911 (Part - I / Sectio n 2) -2010.

...Stiffness factor p = (El lKByta

Here, K = (Kr x 0.3)/ (1.5 x B) = (792x0.3)i (1.5 x 0.45; = 352llma.

p = (2.5 x 106 x 0.00201 288 I 352 x O.45)1t,4 = 2.37 m.

Lr = 0 m. .'. Lr / R = 0, considering layer- ll as a cohesive soil,

Corresponding Lr I R= 2.16

.'. Lt (Depth of fixity) = 2.16 x 2.37 = 5.12 m (say).

The pile Head Deftection, Y = H" x (L1 + tS3 t 1tz El) considering fixed Head Pile'

Allowing a maximum deflection of pile as 1o/o of the pile diameter as per notification

no.54, dated 28th May 2009 of IRC for clause 709.3.5.2 of IRC-78,

0.0045 = H, (0 + 5.12)3 I (12 x 2.5 x 106 x 0.00201288)

Ha = 2.02 MT.
 ASSOCI.{TED ENGINEERING SERVICES 24

Pull Out Capacitv (450 mm dia of pile) :

As per change in clause 709.3.6.2 vide notification no. 54, dated 28.05.09 of IRC 78-2400,
Ultimate pull out capacity = 7Oo/o of skin friction of pile + Buoyant weight of Pile
Ultimate uplift capacity = g 7o x 31'49 = 22'04 MT '
Applying a factor of safetY of 2.5
Safe uplift capacity = 22.04 I 2.5 = 8.81 MT.
Buoyant weight of Pile = nl4 x 0.452 x 8'50 x (2.5 - 1.8) = 0'94 MT'
.'. Safe Pull Out Capacity = 8.81 + 0.94 = 9'75 MT' Say I MT'

SUMMARY OF PILE DATA.WHEN PILE,RESTED WITHIN 9AND LAYER ' III

Tip lenqth = 10.00 m, G'

TA_BLL4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B I 10 11 12

Ultimate Ultimate Ultimate Net Safe Safe Safe l-t I

SI Pile Cut-off Shaft

No. length length Vertical Vertical Vertical
from load load Capacity FS Vertical Vertical Horizontal (Depth
Dia
existing (m) taken by taken by
ground ski n bearing Capacity Capacity Capacity of
(mm) I

(m) (MT ) (MT (MT (MT.) (MT ) F ixity)

) ) (MT )
I

(m)

150 850 31 49 15 23 46 72 2.5 18 68 18 2"02 512

1 450

150 850 36 60 20 16 56.76 2.5 22 70 21 _---_?J1_ 568

2 500

TABLE -5
2 3 4 5 6 7 B
1

Pile Cut-off Shaft Conc. grade Safe uplift Buoyant iafe Pull out
SI
No. Iength from length capacity Wt. of capacity
Dia existing Pile
ground (m) (m) (MT )
(MT.)
(mm)
o
50 094
I

1. 450 1 850 M-25 B81 l,

2. 500 150 i 850 M-25 10 24 1 16 11

 ASSOC I.{TE D ENGINEE,RING SERVICES 25

11 RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUDING REMARKS:

at:
From the foregoing discussions, the following conclusions may be arrived

i) We have calculated the safe capacities for both shallow foundation and deep
foundation for the said 100 MT. lce Plant at Frezerguni.

ii) For shallow foundation, suggested safe pressure of isolated square and strip
footings resting at 1.50 m below the existing ground level may be taken as 6.50
tlmz and 5.00 Um2 respectively up to 3.00 m base width.

iii) For deep foundation in the form of Bored Cast-in-situ Pile, safe_vertical,
horizontal and pull out capacities of different diameters are given in Table -.4
pile
& Table - S in t'his report and also may be consulted to fix the diameter of
as per design requirement.

FOR ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES

Dq. Ashimanta'S enguptn
B.E (Cal), M.E (Cal), Ph.D (JU), MI{,,";
Reg. No.- 43989 of Tg-T 4
Dr. A. Sengupta
B.E. (CAL), M.E. (CAL), Ph.D. (JU), M.l.G.s.
 SHEEI:A-0
AS SOCIATtrD ENGINE,tr,RTNG StrRVICES
THE CONSTRIJCTION OF PROPOSED IOO MT. ICE
PLANT AT FREZERGI'NJ

IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH}4 PARGANAS.

BORE HOLENO. - 1 IS IN PROGRESS AT SITE.

BORE HOLE NO. - 2IS N PROGRESS AT SITE.

SITE PI{O:TOGR-API{
 a.-:--,il

:-
--
-,
--af j-

:- AS SOCIATE,D trNGINEERING SERVICE,S SHEET:B-0

-.1,
=-
r-. PROJECT : SOIL INVESTIGATION W0RK FOR THE C0NSTRUCTI0N 0F PROPOSED 100 MT. ICE PLANT AT FREZERGUNJ
\
J
: IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

-
-!=

-=\
{
=
-{
-
-
=r
:
::-
-,
=
-:--
-
-t
5

:: =-
--
:5 =-
--
-\.= t
g
?t
.:g
BORE HOLE NO. - 3 IS IN PROGRESS AT SITE.
€'
-{
:r.r
g.
B:t
fl
Er"
il

tgr BORE HOLE NIO. - 4IS IN PROGRESS AT SITE.

SITE, PHO:TO(iIAAPI{
=

-
-
-,
J
\r
=

-r
=-t
\, .,
=
.-.!t
t
:,

-,
*=
=

-\tia
:.,
t=
=
r
=-
=
=\-
--t
=
-t =

-,
=
=E-
==a
h. flAJ

+t
-

*a
{
=

-
T
- \
=
J

i
'tI
7I I

:i
-) :

I
I
I
=,
-ti
=i -t
7-l
st
I

d.
rr'
I
I

al
al
rill
d.
rr-
f-i
I

I
I
I

(-) '-l
rrr '2.
/l
I

I
I
i
-il
c-l
Lrl
^/l UI
F<i 4
g.
t

a l=
I
LL]
]

.;
lr- I

vrrr ls
|
/.
)
l;
I

al
*
Z tB
I

lo
il)r
lo- l^
I

i ;_
-:
;-
lc, -
i! lo- iJ
l:
E lb i
Z lz
IC *
H IF _l
/_ \e
v
r>r IU
l= Z
IZ lx
IF
la
i
lz Z
lr! lo
I
loirf
It:-
lx
c-r

2
I
It- lv
It l*.
t-

r< to
lB i;-

iU lz
l-l
IC
lo lr-ls
I\J
lCI
ta li-lal3
1< IZ CVOX lVNTI3I,NI
l=
to
la
t..
lr-
ti
t\J
' t v\

| ,^,
,
I --.,
F-)

I
ll-&.^,/
la-
 BORE LOG DA-|A SHEET S[.IEE]' NO
I ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES LAND / MARTNE A -2
:

PROJECT: SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTIOI! OF B,H. N0 :

LOCATION :
I

PROPOSED IOO MT ICE PLANT AT FREZERGU}IJ N THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH

24 PARGANAS.
Fishing Harbour, Frezergunj.

(.( ).ORDINATE . SAM PLES NOS AUCER PERCS IWASH Dtil

TYPE OF t-r

r, LjNDTSTURBED(U BORINC
I l- t- D T'EST ) 03
I
I
2, DISTURBED DIA ( rrrnr ) 1s0 1s0
l'l N I- t-ROM ETLR (S.P.T) t2 a)PENETROMETER(P) 12
\ \\1. (v) b ) OTHERS 02 DEPTI{ ( rn ) r .50 I2200
( ( )\1\1 t N('[_D ON : li 08,2l WATER STRUCT A'f ( M ) 0.80 CROUND /+E* R.L. - Not Known
r()\il,[ IIt.t) 0N.l-1.09.2 I STANDTNC W.L.( M ) r.00
D[-SC'RIPTION SYMBOL R.L. DEPTH ( Ivl ) ilNil
SAMPLES
(M) FROM TO VALUE REF. NO DEP-['H ( M )

Frllc,.l up soil consisting 0f light yellowish 000

grc) clal e,\, silt lvith kankars. 0. s0
D-i 00.5 0

\i cn soft to soft light bluish , blackish 0.50 D-2 0l .00

grc) silty cla1, ,' claycy silt. Fine sand
II
02 P-l 01.50 - 02.10
intrusion obserued at 4.50 m depth. u-l 03.00 - 03 4s
5.00 03 P -2 04.50 - 05 1()
N4edium light bluish / silver grey clayey s.00 t2 P-3 06 00 - 06 (r0
sandy silt sitrty fine sand with mica.
,/ t6 P -4 07.50 - ()ri Ir)
III
l9 P-5 0e 0() - 0e.60
I 1.00 24 P-6 10.50 1 I l0
l'rlctlium to still light bluish grey sandy l 1.00 l0 P -7 I 2.00 - 1 2.60
srity clay lclayey silt. IV u -2 13.50 - I 3.e5
16.00 17 P-8 Is 00 - 1 5.(r0
So{i to medium light bluish / blackish r 6.00 05 P 9 16.50- 17. l0
-)
grc)' silty clay / claycy silt. Fine sand TJ 18.00- I8..15
intrusion observed at lower depth. V (\7 P- r0 l9.50-20r0
t2 P-11 2t .00 - 2t .60
22.00 16 P- t2 22.00 - 22.61)

BO tIE FIOL E TERM NATED AT 22,0 ]MDEP I"FI

--r BORE LOC DATA SHEET SHEET NO:
J
ASSOCIATED ENIGNEERNG SERVICES LAND / MARINIE A-3
hr J .
Ha.-
I'}R0JtCT: SOIL NVESTIGATIOI{ WORK FCR TI{E CONSTRUCTI0N 0F LOCATION B.H. NO 2
=
) PROPOSED IOO MT. ICE PLAhiT AT FREZERGL}J Ni THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH
= - ].1 PARGANAS.
={ ]-:
Fishing Harbour, Frezergunj .

-Llr
_
:. _J

h*.
.J ('( )-ottDINA"rE SA M PLES NOS AUC ER PERCS IWASH DI( IL.I
TY PE OF
:
rE rl I UNDISTURBED ( U BORING
I'il. I l) I t.S
) 03
I
-t- I

- 2 DISTURBEt) DIA ( rnrn ) r50 150

=
-=a t,[ \l lR()i\lt_ I[_R (S.P.T) t2 a)PENETROMElER(P) l2
.-
: =v
\'ANl (\',) b ) OTHERS 02 DEPTH ( m ) r.50 I 22.00
('OMI\4ENCED ON : l-1.08.2 I WATER STRUCT AT ( M ) I .20 CROUND /+E+ R.L. - Not Known
- ('oMPLETED ON: 15.08.2 I STANDTNC W.L.( M ) r.s0
ilNil
- SYMBOL R.L. DEPTH ( M ) SAMPLES
-rra (M) VALUE
€=r FROM TO REIT. NO DEPTH ( M )

Ea .i rllrd up soil consisting 0f light yellowish

i' 0.00
€=-/ !re\ clayey silt with kankars.
D- l 00.50
E,,.
€r \ crv soli to soli light bluish / blackish 0.s0
0.5 t)
D-2 0r.00
F-
<

grc)' silty clay ,/ clayey silt. Fine sand UI 0l .50 - 0l .e5

gi
: intrusion observed at 4.50 m depth.
II
03 P- I 03.00 - 03.60

?t
g Mcdium light bluish / silver grey clayey 5.00
s.00 05
ll
P -2
P-3
04.50 - 05 10
06.00 - (Xr.60
-\.
g santh' silt i siltv flne sand with mica. l5 P- 4 07.5(l - ()ti .l()
=t III
P-5 09 ()u - 09.6t)
r8
il.00 23 P-6 10.50 - I r.l0
- Medium to stiff light bluish grey sandy il.00 t2 P -7 l 2.00 - 12.60
-ia-
=, silty clay / clayey silt. IV r6 P-8 r3.50- r4.10
- 15.45

ilH
*" r6.00 u -2 15.00
Solt to medium light bluish / blackish r6.00 04 P-9 r6.50- r7.10
P - r0 t8.00- r8.60
5t grey silty clay / clayey silt. Fine sand
intnrsion obsen'ed at lower depth. V
06
u-3 19.50 - 19.95
il P- il 2r.00 -21.60
22.40 t7 P- t2 22.00 - 22 60

'TERMINATED AT 22.00 M DEPTII

BO RE IJOLE
l,ll'li
+
:g; AS SOCIATED EI..IGNEE RNG SERVICES BoRELoG DAm SHEET NO.
LAND / I\,ARI}JE A 4
I

/PROJECI: SOIL TNIVESTICATIO]'( \\,ORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF : i

- LOCATION :
B.H. NO

=1 PR0POSED 100 i\4T ICE PLANT AT FREZERGLTJ

24 PARCANAS
N THE DISTRICT 0F SOl.rTH

Fishing Harbour, Frezergunj.

-'
-
-{ ( O-ORDll'\AtE SAiVI PLES i
NOS TYPE OF AUCER PERCS WASH DRIt,t- i

I. UNDISTLIRBED ( U ) BORINC
I ll.t_D 1-F,S-r
. 2. DISTURBED
03
I't \I:TROlvlETER (S.P.T) t2 DIA(mm) r50 r50
=.J a ) PENETROIv{ETER ( P t2

il
\ \\t, (\') )

=1 ( o\1\l LrN('ED ()\ : 5.08.2

b ) O]-HERS

wA rER STRUCT AT ( M )
02 DEPTH ( rn
I r.so 22.00
1
0.70 GROUND /+EB,R.L. - Not Known
( o\1Pl-ETED ON : t 5.0g.l

il
-a I) tJ S C' It I P T I O N
STANDTNC W.L.( M

SY I\{ BOL
(M)
)

R.L.
r .00

DEPTH ( M )
FROM TO
ilN''

VALUE REF. NO
SAMPLES
DEPTH ( N4 )
?ra Filled up soil consiit 0.00
-=a grcy clayey silt with kankars. D- r 00.5 0
=v 0.s0
\i cry soft to soft tlght bluish / blackish
=J
0.5 0 D-2 0r.00
grc), silt;u- clay / claye), silt. Fine sand
=- II
03 P- I 0r.50-02.t0
irrtrusion observed at 4.50 m depth.

il
=l ]lcdtum lrght blursh / srlver grey clayey
sandi silt z silty fine sand with mica
5.00
5.00 03
r3
U-I
P -2
P-3
03.00 - 03.45
04.50 - 05 t0
06.00 - 06 60

+t III t7 P-1 07.50 - 08 l()

ilili
-
.t:tttunt to strII lrght blursh grey sandy
.iltr clar',, claycy silt. IV
II.OO
11.00

r6.00
20
25
ll
r8
P-5
P-6
P-7
Ll -2
P-8
09.00 - ()9.o()
10.50-
12.00
I3.50-
15.00
lt
- I 2.(r0

-
13.e5
t5.00
l0

n-i )ott to medrum lrght blursh / blackish r6.00 04 P-9 16.50- 17.10

ilt grey silty clay I clayey silt. Fine sand

intrusion observed at lower depth. V 07
u-3
P - t0
18.00 - l8 -+s
19.50-20. l0

+I 22.00
t2
I8
P-ll
P- t2
2t ,00 - 2t .60
22.00 - 22.60

il
BORE HOLE TERMINATED AT 22,00 M DEPTH

il
j

::
TU

I]ORE LOC DATA SHEET SHEET NO:

t, ASSOCIATED ENGNEERII.{G SERVICES
:Fq LAND / MN RI}TIE A-5
-
=lJ PROJECT: SOIL TNVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRI.JCTION OF LOCATION :
B.H. NO : 4

:J PROPOSED IOO MT ICE PLANT AT FREZERGLTNJ N THE DISTRICT OT SOUTH

-
= 2.1 PAI{CAI\]AS.
Fishing Harbour, Frezergunj

- q
=J

(.0-0RDINATE SAM PLES NOS TYPE OF AUCER PERCS iWASH DRILL

'TEST I.UNDISTURBED(U) BORINC
I- I I. t, D 03
I'[.NF. I'l{OME]-ER (S.P T) t2
2. DISTU RBED
a)PENETROMETER(P)
DIA ( rnm ) 150 I I s0
t2
\ ,\\1, (\') tr ) Ol-l-{ERS 02 DEPTH ( nr ) r.s0 I 22.00
('OI\41\'lENCi:D 0N : 16.08.2 I WATER STRUCT A-f ( M ) 0.80 CROLiND /+EB R.L. - Not Known
('oMP[.E'l ED 0N : lr7.08.2I S'TANDINC W.L (M) r .00
ilNil
DESC'RIPTION SYMBOL R.L. DEPTH ( M ) SAMPLES
(M) FROM l'o VALU E REF. NO DEPTH ( M )

I'illcd up soil consisting ol light yellowish 0.00

grey' clayey silt with kankars.
D- I 00.s0
0.50
\,'er\ soft to soft light bluish / blackish 0.5 0 D-2 0r.00
grct :ilty clay / clayey silt. Fine sand
II
LJI 0l .50 - 0l .qs
rntnlsit,n obsen'eri at 4.50 m depth. 03 P- I 03.00 - 03.(r()
5.00 04 P -2 04.50-05 t0
i\1u'dium light bluish i silver grey clayey 5.00 t2 P-3 06.0r) - t)6 60
isandv silt i silty" f-rne sand with mica. r5 P-4 01 .5() - 0li.l()
tt'
III
l9 P-5 09.00 - ()e 6()
11.00 24 P-6 10 50 - II l()
\lcdiurn to stiff light bluish grey sandy 1r.00 t2 P-7 12.00 - ll.(r0
:rltr clav I clayey silt. IV l7 P-8 I3.50 - l-l I0
16.00 LI -2 r5.00 - 15.45
16.00 P-9 r 6.50 - I 7.10
lSoft to rnedium light bluish / blackish 0_i

ig,'.y- siltyJ clay / clayey silt. Fine sand 06 P - r0 18.00- r8.60

l*
lintrusion observed at lower depth. V u-3 19.50 - lc).95
l3 P-lr 2l .00 - 2l ,60
22.0A t7 P- t2 22.00 - 22.60

BORE HOLE TERMINATED AT 22.00

ll M DEPTH
: v
ftr BORE LOC DATA SHEET
U i ASSOCIATED EI{GNEERNG SERVICES
I LAND ,N,Inf.I}}E
SHLrtrl- NO
A-6
:

f--_-
-=

=U
-t
=
lPROJIC'T:
S0lL INVESTIGATION WORk FoR THE CoNTSTRUCTToN 0F
LOCATION B.H. NO : 5
\ pnoposED 100 MT rcE pLANT AT TREZERGU\J N THE DrsTRrcT 0F souTH
:

= - I
I

lr1 PARCANAS Fishing Harbour, F rezergunj .

-r-q I

=J

ID ( ()-ot{DtNA It SAMPLES NOS TYPE OF AUC ER PERCS WASH D t{ILL

=
a3
:- F ILI,D I'ES T I.UNDISTURBED(U)
2. DISTURBED
03
BORINC

l'}I N t-TROME-fER (S.P.T) t2 DIA(mm) rs0 I50

a)PENETROMETER(P) t2
VAN t_ (V)
-
"=
b ) OTHERS 02 DEPTH ( nr ) r .50 22.00
('OlVlMf:NC'ED ON .17.08.2 WATER STRUCT AT ( M ) CROUND /+EF R.L. - Not Knorvn
I
0.70
-
=-
Tr
= ('()\4 I)l.ETED 0N:18.08.2
STANDTNC W.L (M)
I
r.00
=V
-;-
I) I S (' t( I P T I (-) N SY BOL R. L. DEPTH ( M ilNil
SAMPLES
-tn i\4

(M)
)

-=U
-+l
-= FROM TO VALUE REF. NO DEPTI-I ( M )

Fillcd up soil consisting of light yellowistr 0.00

-=J
= grey clayey silt with kankars. D- I 00.s0
0.5 0
-r.r
.-:=J Very soft to soft light bluish / blackish 0.5 0 D-2 0r.00
grey silty clay / clayey silt. Fine sand
E- ,r II
02 P- I 0r.s0-02 r0
=a
-Er
==
intrusion obsen,ed at 1.50 m depth. Li I 03.00 - 0i 45
5.00 04 -2 P 04.50-05.t0
=:
=U
?-r Mcdium light bluish / silver grey clayey 5.00 lt P-3 0600-0660i
sandy silt / silty fine sand with mica. P-4
+\
=(,
-u
III
t1
r8 P-5
07 50 - 08 ltt
(jeoo-oe60I
i

Tr Il,lcdium to stilf light bluish grey sandy il.00

11.00 23
r0
P-6
P -7
r0.50- il.101
12.00 - 12.60
si lty c lay I clayey silt. IV u -2 r3.50 - r3.e5
16.00 t9 P-8 15.00- 15.60
Soft to medium iight bluish / blackish r 6.00 0s P-9 I6.50- 17.r0
grc) silty clay / clayey silt. Fine sand u-3 18.00- r8.-+s
intrusion observed at lower depth. V 07 P- r0 19.50 - 20. It)
r3 P: ll 2t.00-2r.60
22.00 r8 P- t2 22.00 - 22.60

BORE I{OLE TERMINATED AT 22.0A N4 DEPTH

llttrt
E:.
::: :lJ *l
- _lU
-r\r
: ,I

-
:
:K
-J J\
:_ i\ a
o.
C)
-l
J I
(,)
'tf
r)

=l
-:, F
a
:l u lfr

-t:a Ir] +

a
ll.1 rr,
a I
t ,,>
(n 4
z -
.;
,J
:a
1f

--i 7 c.l
i4

-o
a.)

t-
0)
a
,,1

€ o
-l F t)
).
I
H

c.r) 'a .J

-=--l z E G
a
.?
==l I
F<
tr\
- trl

-\L 0 .o () \l

cd
/. .J

>. L'- -f
- 17
l&
F
,f
,J
a
()
(-) U
j ,/,
--a
=! F
7.
*l
t-
co
ii
,-'

.A
,.
)'
i)
.i
-
=t:, =rh a .J

c) ;
I

)\
-LI rlj E
.9
9 ={J
C)

(u
E
d
/.
F () a a
E
;
--L7 ?-

;rI]
cl
I
l-t

)'
Z.

-{- CN E ,,J
)
!0
r-'

=F7 cd,
O-,.

.\L a-
a
rJ4

to .

T
c
lL h
d) o -
z b0
() va-
(A
F-
!()
oo
U 50 J
('d C)
t-
& =
-l F .o o0
'{
-J
-
:
V-
a
z
o
U
.l
I
I

I
I

C) (.-{
,,,
e
-

a a JJ

: ta

- 5J)
B a
z o0

- O -c
==l F
- J .3
t a
50
L)
,

1
=:I F
a

a
- t! I

z
-J €
ca a

F t C)
(/)
U
gJ
4.)
z
o
d

cl -'r a r € O
6r-f\laial cl 6 -f trt'O r * ?^ cl
- =

l3'1 z!\O-IEfl tlr:I,-l1ru NLI HJdSC

 SHEET NO: A 8

PI{OJI:('l : SOII- INVtTS'flGAl'lON WORK FOR C'ONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 100 MT. ICE PLANT AT FRASERGANJ
SOUTII :1 PARGANAS.

BLOWSi30crn (N)

ll.ll.NO.-l-O Il.ll.NO.-2:O B.H.NO.-3*X

t- I L. [- D 'N' \'A LL;fi GRAPI-{

=
-{ tt
'-r
=

ENGINEERING SERVICE,S SHEETNO: A-9

aq I

NSTRUCTlonorpnopoSEDl00MT.ICEPLANTATFMSERGANJ'
=Y
T
rn{
SOUI'[I 21 I'AI{GANAS.

uLOWSi30cm (N)

__t
-l J
}?
:T
--l
vI
__rt
-i

j
v:
::::-

-*p
=l
=l
-"
__
=l le
-?
LL -.l
:? v,
_l I

,/ i,

::
-:
-t.
/"
;,

T, -t
-?l
i

T?
:
-,1
:t
-l :l
F-L -t
.zl
: 7 -l
*l
-l
I
-l I

-l
.l
-,
-l
T

{
:l

-l
r
=t
-rJr
- =J
-
-\=J
==i
=*rL
=?
?b
ilil B.H. NO.- 5 :(B)

i,I ELf)'N' \/ALUE CRAPH

 Slltrt-t \O:,\-t0 I :
al
,:l
rrl I

lr
V
I

td

rr'l

a r/
t{
r r'l
ru
:J
0
ri
\/
tl

Z
F.(

Z. /,
lvl
*l
l-\

'tal

Z
e ul
rFr i

ZI
7- \ I

'*rl
l
nl
ril
l=
t)
HI
LI rl
l'*
lz -(l
I
UI
7\l

nt
\,
I

lm
i'o
I

1<
l-
azl
I
I

to
I

I
F

]F I I

i:lnnl I

ii*Ji
i H

lElffi l^/ I

lr&l
lr
le i

lo
I )-'

lEl[
I

lrrl
I

Irs
rTr
I

, l0
tl I

Int
l;IU
rE\ffi
? I I I I I i I I I I t r t t ' ' ' ' ' 'o
oc)
.l

) _l&
lr
l><

t<
ln
I l*r
[_
c-l^
tE x ? 3 = ; g 3 R = '/ Z
I

I
I
I
l- ffi 7
o
-t SI-IEET'NO:A-ll
V)
----
<\
ll
=-

ilifE'
lr'l
I U
t*a

U
l-i

=-I

Itl;
rl
'J. r/
:l
l ;i.i:E
I

4l lar
/l I

/r'l
,^]
-.l
tll
-l
-A J V)

=l 2

:i
=l

lal::::
=Y r'.7.

=l
-qra ;
=l
=Y
- a

-ra
--l

il
aD,
=-i =
n
t-l

lII,,,
frl

lEl tt{
L
t

+5
iil
o

il
2- F(
7.
1.
r, U
n
v
CI
T
EJ Itl\i
gr
-r-, /. I
i
I

?e
I I
I

Zi
I I
1

Z
n
nl
+i v
VI
FI
il
I

F
Fal
/
)l
IEl mt
rY\
Irr{
t-{
d,
lr{ t

il
5l /,
rl
l

F
- a
F<
n

il1r
l-1

i lrt
IIFat'l
lv)
t,

lil:i
!:f,
l-r
* lu
iF
7 IF

t
)t
=P U
i<
lC.
,1
^,t
7l
Z
,JI

ti
nl
-j
SHEf:'l N() A l2
-
!--,{ V)

=t i!
0 ()8 U
Fi

=l
- rft
T,
hr
^l

-l
lr)
=-I J
H.l
V)
f r'
rh
a 3 ooz U
zrl Z
- u
FT
&
I n/
l-(
- 4 l'r I
.t r.f- t*l
=v
-a r\ U) lrl
u
=l F
'r' !t r 7
tq
a rtl
- Z
f \J

IlII
-
<l
Z
& ,) lr\
II
=J
=r l*l
irl Ar
u'Ll
/\r\'?

0l
5?l.
-L rvl
I'Jr
I;
!

=
I L_l_l FI
./l
I

\l
a-(
5r
Hl
7_.
/r
UI

il3f
I

f
nl
vl
'ei
ni

\E\1
I

il
I
I
I

I
I
i
I

I i

Zi
I
I I

i
I

il+i
I

I
I AI
\-/ I

F(l
rl
f-
)

lE\
/\i
l.Jr{
frt

ilh5
^/
l.H

F
a
t-f
n
l-i

r!
N

:I
F(
a

il
=t
r!
-l

lEl
U
trf

F
t{
^/
<-E

? R ci :i -l
A
i*r

t lE l5-=-= a ?
=u:rt-i= 3DVJN3)u3.1 = Z Z
,i
I I 5
i-1
 SHE,ET NO : ,A - L3 'l

CI
I'rI
l{
r\
00$ U
F.f
\
)
:,f
*.
.
N
,-/
/ t'l
r.l.l
Y
a
u rt.l
a 3 o'oc V
z z
Fi
c. il
H

,,,,1
.f rlJ
(^.i U) rr)
t*J
F-
:] lrt Z
ca s L'n |-r
rh
LL]
d a TJ
Z c.
(,
4. Z
d Y l'r'l
*l
tla
&
w
F
F -:
7-
C ,t
J /_.

LIl a
I 3s;r o
#
z
C)

:
|-r
ta
a
o
&
A
tr.,
C
zc st0'0
F
U
3
&
F
a
z
U
&
o
w
g
L'
ts
z
I'O
F- t=
t: \
tr
a
tI]
2
L
l:
lc
i<>
Z. lc a
J I
O lc",
a
F l= :
U
l.
I
rr''l

o t-
t^.

=d
 SHEET \O:A-14
x
tt
I I I I I L I I i t t I l=l .^. I r I \./

el:..,
al
al
gl ='
-

:::
lz
l-t
t-
la
I i-i
nl-
lu:
71"
1l /l
'tI

t.'
lz
I

I Z
n
I
U
l-t
_l
F.
)
I

NA
llJ
t<
/,
I
i-..
U)
lri
I n
),-i
I

IJJ
I

I N
I
U)

LI]
t-]

gl
F.
l*r
^/
1.
0.
t
qr
lE I = 3 3 ? 3
=uEritr
R
;7 .Z

.i
I 3Dv.LNgf,ugd
 1

thr
-,
hr'-

I'"".
Sl-lF F. I \() : '\ - 15
-\ a
f
\ \,
, , I I I I I I'i I : I
a
"l
i{
l't
\l
)i
\
hil
I )
't.
J lr
^/
t'r ''l

{ trt

E\;
J -'/
n

- I ' i .l
I
I
rfl

eIIi IIIIIIIIIi i1l l=

oo; U

\a\
-, Z
o =
Z ^l
H

'tLl
"l
l'r )
rrt

Z
Id
rIr
U
Z
::: tn
Iti
I r't
I r'l
i*{

/ Iti
lu
It
lL

t\
/. lH
1.
{, iU
ln v
\E\ _.1
Irn
\r7
'r1
it
i--
I i

\Z i

iA\./

\a\ I
-iF
llI
I i-t

\E\1i
na,
I "Lr
l-t
l*
|

i-
l-
II r,o
--(
to

lE\al
Iu
I

Irs | --r
la
I

It-lti:
lu
lr
lr<

I B lll _t /,
t<
l= lffi lc.
IHlllllliilllllll. - c
I

A- I :--^
Ilt-5'-Rj - -- 9 ? ... .r
ci -+-
lt
la
lv

i,-
|
ll ffi |
ls-
ln
t
\-/
--t

l-l
rr.t
al
I
./i
ol
o<l
-l i

OI
&l
I

ZI
ol
I

o.I
rLl
ol
el
FI
UI
I
titoo -tl
Fr
l
el
FI
al
An
'-Ll
t<

^/
i*(
ZI
pl
UI
F
a
d,
cl I FI
r\
r&l l-{
VI
d, l
cl I t'r
tll

zl N
CI
trl a
(, I
l'r
t*(
"l

FI
at
I

r-]
rr I
i*r
i
i
U
zl
idl
iri
t-.
JI
()I
al
I
t*r
^l
F] I

n
lrl
U
H
c&
O- .Z
\7
\./
oa
u
o. Z
=3f;?33=oc> lJ.J
v
c
 '!

0
l'r'l
f*.(

0'08
!
:"
i,
l*r
^/
['r' ]
/1 trl
a
rh
a 3 o'0. U
"7
l(<
Z
& v
O., It.'
.t lH
(-.l lv)
lJ.l
t-
)C 7
H
a rl
V
Z
Z
rrI
d '*r
trl
a n
t-i
tu
F u
t'v "!

F
F
z
f.d
J
A.
rl] U
U n
\J
F,
r-{ CI
a
r,
1
;r! .l

a ,/i
O"
O =l-
&
O.
t
I

I
Z
\J
f&
o
,^:
^trf
z --sl0'0 I
L
c t

)
t- t( ,

U nn
rJi
d. F(
F-
a r/
l*(
-Z
a F
U
&
(-.r
q* tj.l a
H
ct& \.-,
-'
h'J<
I
t-t n
V
u
l
frtt

&
() z t'r
l,Li
"l

B c= N
Z t.
',/. a
tr
o
=
-- lv)
Lrt
tl
3eN
F-
a
r"l
U
H
.r\
-{
7, \--? *J
i-.
J -l r/
I
!U
J
Hrl
l-
I
./
{

l- - 1' n
l<
I k^-
t*i
l-
HI
tr.looc= ====tn
rC ,sf ,
(.l
IC
OO
.Z ^,Z
1"6*'r--
LrJ
o a
 -it

-=rl ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES SHEET:A-17

=-
=
OF PROPOSED iOO MT' ICE PIANT AT FRASERGAN]'
-i
=q PRO]ECT ; SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION

SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
-V
--t--{

-I
:'E 1
B.H. NO. - 1

DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 06.00 M 06'60 M

C = 0,00 KG / SQ'CM
_.-l
- O = 310
3.0

=I zt
3 z,s
-r
__-l -l
(9l
z.a

_-I =l

il=:I El
I

1,5
LUI
d.l
f,i 1.0
sl
=-ld f;l
II
0.s
ol
:Y ' o.o
-lr
f 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3'0 3'5 4'0
:.:l 2
NORMAL STRESS IN KGJ CM
l

n
-l
--L
-? B.H. No. - 2
J
DEPTI-I OF SAMPLE : O9.OO M 09.60
M

C = 0,00 KG / SQ.CM
-=_: I
- O =320
j-l 3.0
-
--l
-={ 3
=l z.s
-== f -l
tJ)l
z.o

- =l
(,l I

1q
L'cr
uDl
rut
d,l
-

a
-

=t
_l =v
hl
d.l
fil
=l
tnl
'
I
1.0

os

o.o
--- ll 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3,0 3.5 4,
!y
:-l = 2
NORMAL STR
-lr
-J
-\(
r, GRAPH FOR DIRECT SHEAR TEST DWG, NO :

o
),
=r
:Yj ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES
SHEET:A-18
il:{ MT' ICE PIANT AT FRASERGAN]'

il PROJECT : SOIL INVESIIGATION WORK

FOR CONSTRU TION OF PROPOSED 1OO

-I
LI
SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

B.H. No. - 2
::T { DEPTH OF SAMPLE : t0'50 M 11'10 M

C = 0.00 KG / SQ.CM
=T
+qa
- O=330
:

=T 3.0

El 2.5
-=l (,i
>ll
- I 2.0
z.l
_-t
H

- V)
a 1.5
-a LU
d
-5
-_L
F
a
d
1,0

0.5
:l-J tJ.l
:tr
a
=- 0,0 ffi
--\'q 0,0 0.5 1.0 1,5 2.0 2'5 3'0 3'5 4'0
=J 2
NORMAL STRE9S IN KG I CM

B.H. NO. - 3
-
DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 06'00 M 06'60
M

C = 0.00 KG I SQ'CM
O = 310
3.0
N
5l
!(,l 2.5
\ll
2.0
=l
'-.. I

(.r)l
a 1.5
LU
d.
F
a 1.0
d.
LU 0.5
a
=
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3,0 3 .5 4.0
2
NORMAL STRESS IN K9 / Cy

DWG. NO
DIRECT SHEAR
 -. .,J
E{l
= -sl ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES SHEET:A-19
=
-fl
-€l PROIECT : SOIL INVESTIGAilON WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 100 MT. ICE PLANT AT FMSERGANI,

-g SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

=Y
-{
-J B.H. NO. - 3
=-jJ
i DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 10.50 M - 11,10 M
=l C = 0.00 KG / SQ.CM

-I 3,0
0=330

+
=! =l
UI
---l
(9l
2,5

+
ts-
=! q
,
>ll
zl
,-..1

(rl
(,l
LUI
2.0

1.5
I

:-: d.l
\ FI
(nl L.0
-, d.l
=l <t 0,5
LI rul
:trl
u,l
0.0
0.0 0. 5 .0 .5 2.0 7.5 3,0 3,5 4.0
=-I 1 1

-t
=-T
NORMAL STR
2

B.H. NO. - 3
{ M 06,60 M
DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 06.00
=l
h{
C = 0.00 KG / SQ"CM
=l O = 3Lo
-, 3.0
zl
-a
=r ul
(JI
2,5
VI
- 2.0
=l
r+l
- tnl
(,l 1.5
=?
={ utl
d.l
-5 FI
(rl
dl
<t
1,0

LUI 0.5
-frr- =l
(/rl

- =v
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
2
- NORMAL STRESS IN KG / CM

-\.
=O FOR DIRECT SHEAR TEST DWG. NO
t R,APH :

I
 =-ri SHEEI:A-20
=.
:-1
ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES
woRK FoR c'NsrRuclroN oF
PR,P.'ED 100 MT' lcE PLANT AT FRASERGANI'
- ,-*" , tt,***GATIoN

il
=\r SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

il B.H. NO. - 4
DEPTHOFSAMPLE:09'00M09'60M
=1
-ra C = 0.00 KG / SQ'CM
-EI O =320
-i t
:-E I 3.0
-rif
r{
EI
-l j 2,5
-L ( t,l
-i z.a
z.l
::l { ,-,.1

-=<r
{ sl
url
1..5

a=t t, *.1

:{ 6i 1.0
*l
=r
-1!t f;l o.s
=l
ml

-f
=ta 0,0 0.5 1.0 1'5'.2'0
? IN K9 / CM
2
NoRMAL sl-RESS
,
--
,
-- B.H. No. - 4
\. DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 10'50 M 1t'10 M

=l
L..ra c = 0.00 KG / sQ.cM
--:= t O = 330
:=
-:a
-{ I-
zl
<t=l- 3 z.s

=l
--r,lr
-l z,o
(9l

z.t
r<l
=7
=-rrL
4t sl l.s
LUI

%-
- d.l
hl r.o
:+-
TJ
5
*l
fii
ir :Ei
f,l
o.s

*.
gJ
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2'0 2'5 3'0 3'5
F NORM
2

il
ilo
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DWG. NO :

ilo
 ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES SHEET:A-21

PROPOSED lOO MT. ICE PLANT AT FMSERGANJ'

PRO]ETT : SOiL INVESTIGATION WOR( FOR CONSTRUCTION OF

SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

B.H. NO. - 5
DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 06.00 M 06'60 M

C = 0.00 KG / SQ.CM
O = 310
3,0

2.5

2,0
Z
a
a 1.5
LU
d.
l-- 1.0
a
d
UJ 0.5
:E
a
0.0
0.00.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3'5 4'0
2
NORMAL S

B.H. NO. - 5

DEPTH OF SAMPLE : 07.50 M 0B' 10 M

C = 0,00 KG / SQ.CM
O=3Zo
N 3.0
EI
rrl 2.5
ul
>li
i 2.0
z1
a
V) 1.5
LU
d.
F
a 1.0
d.
LU 0.5
T
a
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3,0 3.5 4.0
)
NORMAL _STRESS IN Kq / cM -

GRAPH FOR DIRECT SHEAR TEST

I
a
*
=l
=tl
-d
-\l AS SOCIATED E,NGr}iEERTNG SE,RVICES SHEETNO: A-22
=-t
-_i
PR0JECT:S0ILINVESTIGATI0NW0RkF0RTHEC0NSTRUCTloNorpnopo
N
=t
-l THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH:4 PARGANAS.
\.
=
-a Lc - 1 006
=l
_-

I a

=l
--a (\

=I
5<
\
\ {
-:1
r_a \
_I )_ !\-\
B.H. NO.- r
L
- )-,, TYPEOFSAMPLE-U.I
\L
-I
-L
=Y
-
I F DEPTH

a
:- 03.00 M - 03.45 M
_ 0.22
-!..
J
=-l
-, I

--..$

r*
--.L
'P' ( KC i CIvl-)

4
f
-t
-,.-?
r-<l
=Y
r-L
=t
_L B.H. NO.- I

=P
flr
TYPEOFSAMPLE-U-3
DEPTI-I :- I 8.00 M - 18.45 M
_)
+
'-'l v
e - 0.20

=l
'-'l v
=

-{
r
? CONSOLIDATION TEST EILOG CTJRVE DWO. NO.
?
:

Lr
t SHE,ET NO: A -23
q ASSOCIATE,D E,NGINE,ERIN G SE,RVICtr,S
t OPOSED IOO MT. ICE PLANT AT FREZERGUNJ
tr.
-
, IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH}4 PARGANAS.
,

{
fre
=J
-\
-)
=

-
=
=

-
-
TYPE OF SAMPLE - LJ -I
-
DEPTH :- 0l .50 M - 0l .95 M
.-l
J
-:

J
=

- a .

=
r-a
5
=
r\q
-f
-i J Loc oF 'P' ( KC

- j

-1
H*
=

=*3
---3
:
Fr
J B.H. NO.- 2
=
E_\ TYPE OF SAMPLE .U -2
J
=
b-\ DEPTH :- 15.00 M - 15.45 M
J C(. := 0. 14
=
-e
-,
EQ
J
=

a
-

o
LOG'P' DWG. NiO.
CONSOLIDATION TE,ST C - CTJRVE

r
 A S SOCIATED ENGTNE,ERTNG STRVICES
SHEET i\fo: A -24

l r -e
0
: 1.032

(L
rI
ri ti65 \
\ \\
0 7.15 \
)-- tt
ol :( L \ B.H. NO.- 3
-] ( TYPEOFSAMPLE-U-I
II L --( \l
;il DEPTH :- 03.00 M - 03.45 M
;l
Cc _ 0.23

0. _s I[t 20 80 t0
l)
LOC OF 'P' ( KG ,' CN,I

(t 5-lt.r
B.H. NO.- 3

=l TYPE OF' SAMPLE - IJ - 2

il 0.16()
DEPTH:- t3.50 lV - 13.95 M
*
Cc 0.16

CONSOLIDATION Ttr,ST C - LOG'P' CT]RVE DWG. NO.

 AS SOCIATED ENGTNEERTNG StrRVICES SHEETNIO: A-25
PR0JECT: SOIL D,IVESTIGATION WORk FOR THE CON

IN T}IE DISTRICT OF SOLTH ]4 PARGANAS.

e:
r)
0.954

L
(
\
- \ \
\
(
-l
-= L- \
t?
=:l
\
\t L
B.H. NO.- 4
TYPEOFSAMPLE-U- I
L
=T
- DEPTH :- 0l .50 M - 0l .95 M
C, -
-V
' -,r I
0.20

- -iJ
-?
-'- I
-Y
{
*I LOC ()T 'P' ( KG i CM
-)

{
=l
jA - e0 = 0.858

-a
:-
H{
O

L
=l \\
\ \
-
\
-
Ft
L-- _l
=
J B.H. NO.- 4
Lr )r-
=
J j I

) TYPEOFSAMPLE.U.3
:-
DEPTH 19.50 M - 19.95 M
-\ , __t _ a.l7
=
a
-a
=
J I

ry
-rl
-
-l
=,
J

'U
-t-

U
\
10 20
( KG ,, C]VI, )

't COhISOLIDATION TEST I LOG'P' CIJRVE DWG. I{0.

o E

{a
 AS SOCIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES SHEET NO: A -26

-jU PROJECT : SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED IOO MT. ICE PLANT AT FREZERGUNJ

IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH ]4 PARGANAS,

=t
-fl
r< !f
-..-{ 0 7ti0

=I
() 7(x)
{
- () 620

-
:i

,,C
:
ro
- al () -160
B.H. NO.-
TYPE OF SAMPLE - U
5

.2
DEPTH :- 13.50 M - 13 95 M
---[
- _ 0.13
0 iftl
a
=T
,' aL
il=?
il.-t
{

=f
05 l0
(KC
l(t
I
8 0 l0
LOO OIT CN,t I

{
() 96-5
e0 : 0.910
.:l I

---t I
J
I

-T
I

L -.]
-{4
=I 0 785
\\
\ \
=T
Fr-q
\
a 0 (rQj
Fa
=l
L \
=
f -\-- B.H. NO.- 5
+\ :l L TYPE OF' SAMPLE u-3
=u *l -
-\ L \
DEPTIJ :- 18.00 M r8.45 M
-\
=
t C'( --= 0' 19
=l
U
=
hr 0 -l]5
{y
=.

-r
:=!y
\==
*Ql
f
() 2-l-s
l0 20 8 0 t0
C (KG Ctvt )
r

rt
COI{SOLIDATION TEST E. LOG'P' CURVE
o
I.
 -l
--.t
-i
:l
ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES
=t
=T PROJECT: SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED IOO
MT. ICE PLANT AT
SHEET:A- 27

FREZERGL'NJ IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

-=:t
_l

CIRCLE
--j
-€l

='1 UN CONSOLIDATED UN ( UU )
-t
E- I
=l B.H. - L, DEPTH : 03.00 M
DRAINED

03.45 M
,^f 0,60
=J
--,
c!l
rl
UI 0.50
=0.21 KG/CM2, OuU=10
-l
==l --.l
(9I
\lI
0.40
- (,l
(nl
--l l LUI
dl 0.30
=- t FI
al
::l
b-.L dl 0.20
it <l
rul
-l 0.10
-] ml
=:f 0.00
-, 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30
ts- I

I
-=-i I 2)
--- NORMAL STRESS ( KG CM

UN CONSOLIDATED UN - DRAINED ( UU )
=-{
=l
E-l B.H. - 1, DEPTH : 18,00 M 18,45 M
:=i CUU = 0.40 KG lCMz, 0 UU = 10
=-a
=i
E-ra
Y J-] 0.80

=l
ul 0.74
-1 !
={ 9l 0.60
={
11" :al
(,l
u.r I
0.50
-!'
E-( tl
FI
ml
J 0.40
=l
-ir ul
<l
LUI

+
=l

=l-
(,l
=l 0.30

0,20
-t 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30
=J
n-\
=J
E (
NORMAL STRESS KG / CM2 \
J
j GRAPH FOR TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST
-t
 ]: .

ASSCCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES SHEET:A-28

PROJECT: SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED IOO MT.ICE PLANT AT

-I
-{
FREZERGI.INJ T]"i THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

+ UN
CIRCLE
CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )
- B.H, - 2, DEPTH : 15.00 M 15,45 M
^{
r\l 1 ,00
- Cuu = 0.61 KG/CM2 , OUU = 2c
H EI
UI 0.90
=I --l
YI
0,80
:ol
- ,cll
:- lJ-l
tl
I
0,70
=- FI
U (nl
= tl<l 0.60

a
=q
:y tul
=l
trtl 0,50

_-t 0.40

--lI
-::
H-a
7 0,80 0.90 1,00 1,10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1,50 1,60 L,7A 1,80 1.90 2,00 2.L0

=f
H
-tr
NORMAL STRESS ( KG CM
2\

1
T r
---.:

-I

-r* UN CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )

:=f B.H. - 2, DEPTH : 19.50 M 19.95 M

-*
=i CUU = O.42KG lCM2 , OUU =20

: -l
^l 0.90
Nl
5l

a
0,80
-
-LJ
-
-..l
(Jl
\zl
Y 0.70
ol
]b
=-l
==t\
J
ml
tul
ul 0.60
_-(
t\ FI
(/)l
IU *.1 0.50
= <t
tIJ I

-U =l
trll 0,40

-3
\
0.30

_ry 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.L0 2.20 2.30 2.40 2.50 2.60
.\
2\
=U NORMAL STRESS ( KG / CM
I
rl
l:
 SHEET:A- 29
ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES
MT' ICE PLANT AT
FOR THE CONSTRUCTI9N g1PROTOSTO ]!O
PROJECT: SOIL NVESTIGATION WORK
FREZERGUNJINTHEDISTRICToFSOUTH24PARGANAS.

CIRCLE
UN CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )

B,H.- 3, DEPTH:03.00M 03'45M

= 0.23 KG / CM2, OUU = to
0.70
NI C
uu
EI 0,60
(9l
VI
-4 0.50
(nl
(nl
rul 0,40
d.l
FI
L0l
dl 0.30
<l
LUI
(,l
=l 0.20

0.10
0'80 0'90 1.00 t0 1.20 1.30
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0'50 0.60 0'70
1.

')
NO

UN CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )
-rl r
a:r
_=._
:
ll
B.H, -

C
3,
uu =0.59
DEPTH : 13.50 M 13'95 M
KG / CM2 , 0 UU = 2'o

Rlr I
-
Nl
u1
1 ,00

ul 0.90
ul
VI
=5
-
:ol
ml
rul
0,80

* x.l
FI
0.70
(,l
ol 0.60
- <l
t-r.t I

: :tr1
(,l 0, 50
=U
-
5 0,40
1.20 1.30 1,40 1.50 1.60 LJo 1'80 1.90 2.00
- 2.L0
0.80 0.90 1.00 1. 10

il=a)
:=
NORMAL STBESS ( KG
)
/ CM' \

Gl SHEAR TEST
TRIAXIAL
E. GRAPH FOR

HC
=

=
-i
=i
-rl =vlil ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES
:J
=
PR0JECT:SOIL iNVEsTIcATi0N \i,oRK
FOR THE CONSTRUC
SHEET:A-30

FREZERGI.INJ IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24

-\t PARGANAS.

='l
={
CIRCLE
r1 UN . CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )
-
--
'l
B.H, - 4, DEPTH : 15.00 M 15.45 M
1.00
=V
=q
-ra
=1
J]
EI
CUU = 0.60 KG I CM2, OUU = 20
UI 0,90
=I
=-l
(9l
\ZI

=I 0,80

it (nl
al
rul
dl
FI
'l
4.70

0.60
=r
=.
d.l
<l
LUI
II
./rl 0.50
=-?
=v
0.40
-=-v
=-
+i 0'80 0.90 1,00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 i.50 1.60 1,70 1.80
1.90 2.00 2.10
-a
tI rvoRrqet srness ( rc i cru 2 r

=.t
f-l UN . CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )
=Y
F-l B.H. - 4, DEPTH : 19.50 M 19,95 M

r{ CUU =0.43KG/CMZ, OUU = Za

F{ c\l
EI
0.90

rrl
h5 0.80

h
= L'I
\zl

-l
al
0.7a

rP r.ul
d.l 0.60

!t FI
url
d.l
<l
0.50

tf
f'I
I.U

(,l
=l
I

0.40

0.30

I'r
t\
1,30 7.40 1.50 1,60 7.70 1,80 1.90 2.00 2,10 2.20
2.30 2,40 2.50 2.60
IJ
t
GRAPH TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST
o
o
 ASSOCIATED ENGIN EERING SERVICES SHEET i A - 3I

PROJECT; SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION oF PRoPOSED 100 MT.ICE PLANr Ar
FREZERGI.]NJ IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.

CIRCLE
UN CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )

B.H. - 5, DEPTH : 03.00 M - 03 .45 M

0,70
c\l
rl Cuu = o.22KG/CM2 , OuU=10
ul 0.60
(Jl
:ll 0.50
ml
L0l
rul 0.40
d.l
FI
(rl
dl 0,30
<t
rul
=l
./,l 0.20

0.10
0.00 0.10 0.20 0,30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1'30
2
ruoRNRt- stRrss ( rc / cu t

UN CONSOLIDATED UN DRAINED ( UU )

B.H. - 5, DEPTH : 13,50 M 13,95 M

Cuu = o'58 KG / CM2, 0 UU = 20

1 .00
J-l
EI
ul 0.90
(Jl
\lI
Y
ol
0,80
tnl
LUI
d-l 0.70
FI
-l 0.60
d.t
<l
tul
TI 0.50
u,l

0.40
0.80 0.90 1.00 i.i0 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 2.10

NoRMAL srness ( rc / cNZ )

c
c GRAPH FOR TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST
o
={
-r-
: v
-=] ASSOCIATED ENGII\EERII{G SERVICES SHEET:
\ ST'}{}IARY OF TEST RESULTS
il
LI I'}l{(
I('I
).1

I'[.ANT'AT
l:("1": S()ll. INVES"TIGA tION \\ ORK FOR THE CONSTRL]CTION OF PROPOSED l OO M]'
IN TI-lE DISTRICT OF SOLITFI 24 PARGANAS.
_i
=t
IrRL:.7,ERC}LJN.I

Fara
=I 'u
-l
INDEX T
I

Li
I

MECHANICA
-=
-l t
I

a IJ
ANALYS IS I

X : _-___l
=T
F<a Z
Ljj
e i-
F
t
=IY
F-{
J7.
F
a
q)

U- Z
z&.
=
: =
4,
-t
=
LI]
d,
(, frl
*F
\o
o\ \o
o\
'.O
..o

U eu (J
V 9 -l
o\ \o
o\
={ ..
a a= F F
a Z tL
- =Z
I-
inF-7
LJJ LJ.]

v. 2.
trl 5 c/)
d [! Z !

L:.
- ^^ f. ;e r-
rn
f J -j
a- QN a
_i_
\dy
ZU
__-_
d,
C)
--J
e
J
U

il-v
:I
I

l) I
(x) 50 F

o
illecl up soil c()nsistirrq
l- I igh t )'e I low i slr gre)
NP
i2e
58 7t- 2l

L_l er silt rvitlr karrkars

I

_+--- ._ _-_ c lar I

I
i 0r .5s 0 - | V ery soti to soft liglrrt 28 23
l)- Itt:t.10 | trluish I blackish gre,v
|

I siltl clay I clavey silIt

I

l__ sand al.ilSltgI

I

_1 11tlr {rre

I r01 (X)0 I -l)o*Do*Do- e6 i5u i 30

tt ; 0.1 ..i-i5 - ___1_
iu I
i

; 0-l .5 -rjii - rjn bo : 84 i SO

I

I 21 i-J
l, _ l i 05 _-
+- 1q__l-_ 1

l, i 0(r.0.00- lMediurn light bluish I 32 N.P

.60 | silver grey claye v
I

[r_] l066
Iturrdy silt I silty fin e
i
i
I

i-.- I sarrd n,itlr rrr ica.

i

()9 (X) --f---

:
I 0
rll
-Do Do Do -
l, 5 )()(r(t
--'--r-' iff
I I

i ll 00 - i Ilecl irnn j 85 I 46 to stifl' Iight 24 )) 32 r5 ,47 l3

l) -
-1
1.60 i lu ish grey sancly lt'u' i
I tr si

_.__--f_qte1.lry,.y sill.
I

.- - --i-- *

1350-i -Do-Do-Do- :|92 |l44

I I

50 | .l ')
I
il 23 2l 2.61 30 08
itrlli _*_
I

tl -2
I
i
I

.* |-.-.-
()i---l
I l(r 50 light | 93 I
- i Soti to rnediunr---l----l 52 28 1A
,* I

I
38 I07 51 i
I
,1

9, 0 i ish ,'
I

J) I7.I t', islt gre) i

ttr ['r lac li I
I

I
I
I

I siltr clar ' clale) silt i i

i I
I
i
i

I
I
I

.iiuitlrtlnesandintrusiort--- ]--------1-__ t__ I

i

-----l-* __----
l I
i
t__
t
I: tg.o0--l
ttt -Do-Do-Do-I
lqS lSO 27
-l-\
L)
l

I
2.60 36
I

los -4
\/
-, I
I

i
I

I
')
)8

tl-l 18-15 I I
I I
I

:--.' - *1-
,1.'lrl 11.00-l -Do-Do-Do-
I

i9l
I

48 27 2l 32 09 s6 I j
-li
' .. r r
l)-llill.60
1r.60 i i

i i

Iri i12.00-i
'''i--

12.00--i -Do-Do-Do- 186 45 25 20 2.61 3l 14 49 li

P-[ ll(,0 i i
r

\( ) I l.: l) I)clrctrrrtiorr Sarttlrle. N,['] \orr-plastic. f) = Disturbed sarnple, U: Un-disturbed sanrple.

U
3
3
o -__.- J
I
I
 *t
I

SHEET: A. 33 i

SL }I}TARY OF TEST RESULTS I

[:.('l:
I

I' It( [-:C']': S(Jll.

S O I I INVESl-IGATION
.l
).1 N \\ ORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSET ) 100 MT
I'}[-ANT A
I('l: I'I-ANT A'T FREZERGUN.I IN T ]E DISTRICT OF SOTJTH24 PARGANAS t.

i,tI
ti\
N D E X P R o P E R T I E S
ri:-
il
t> I > MECHAI !ICAL
i-lc,
i'rl u ANALYS ;IS
lr;lr*
J'l'1
Al\-/
I
r!
e
X
rtj
o
t t
q [-,
IF
I Z :
:ilin i.c I tr =lz
-
Fr \o
o\
lv
/ f\Z iJj
(,
g \o
o\
I

I l-
I t :
I

,io
I

i x z&. i- rJJ

ol?l
-

ilF rO
l-;
ru eu C l- IU a V
t\,
-rZ J o\ ,-o
,A
l. -
'sl(n rl a= I k
F Z f u
;Z
o.'

=ir
ts | t
.

x?_'rF
*
.iC-ln
ti-
i L] -rlr.r]
dt a U AF
t-
v

Tf,
'lr!'l .rl
'.9 r-
\n -l<
vlr
lt
LtJ
o7, t

-J
inl
l-!
li -
lln i E -l ,J) ,,.n ZU a e -li
Ui
')i

I 00.50 | l'illecl up soil corrsisrirrg 39 N.P 27 6l r6 23

t) i I
I
()l' Iight yellorvislr grey
i'--..,
r1/
i I clavey silt wirh kankars
I
01.50 - | Very soft ro soft light 95 55 30 25 2.5 8 38 0s 50 45i
. [' .95 I b,lu ish I blackish grey
i
I

0 1 I

I siltv clay I clay'ey silt

I

I
I

I vr itlr Il ne sand at 4.5 Orn

l

f '. ..- - -+-

l i0-1.50- I Do-Do-Do- 82 s3 28 25 35 18 i .t5 i 3'
lr-l t,l,rg_L _-- I
j

l (xr oo -
t-M.c| i,*__il[hr btuist, / 29 NP 2l 71 Is l-1
irto.ott lsitver grey clayey,
i

l) - ; I

I
I
i
I

I sancl\ silt I silty firre

J
i
i
I
I

rI --_*--+__
i

i ,*,0", i,;, ,,-,ica. i

I

l i0t).00-
,I i -Do-Do-Do- 2l N.P 2:62 25 79 2t
l) - 5
,
(r0 -l-
09
---- i

l i10.50 I -Do-Do*Do- r6 N.P r6

*lr r!
2,1 84
lr_6
I I1.50- inaediunr to stiff ligh
1

4,,
83 45 21 2l 3l l7 44 39
l)-g I t+. to i n,uislr gre) sandv silr,
_l____j clay / claye),silt.
,- i ls00- -Do-Do-Do- i 93 43 23 2A 2.61 29 07 52 4ti
Ir-]
l 18 (X)
I ir:4i
{,,ti ii; i,,*.tlir.r, -iigiii --.- --"*'1
i]
I
I

l
92 52 28 )4 31 08 )) ;

Ir-I0 : ltl.60 b Iu ish I blac k ish gre),

i

I
I

I
I

i1
i

silty clay clayey silt

l
I

w'itlr fine sand intrusiolr

i
I

i 19 50 - -M
I I

I
1
94 50 27 23 2.60 3s 06 54 air- l
j
1r -i te e5
I
1

11.00- i -Do-Do-Do- 8s 46 25 2t 32 t5 49 36 .

P r: r?.(,!-
-i
\o Il:: l) = Pettetratiolt Santple. \.P. = Norr-plastic. D = Disturbed sample. U : Un-disturbed sarnple.
 - ----1
I

ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING SERVICES SHEET: A -34 I

I

SLI}I}IARY OF TEST RESULTS I

I
I

Pt{O.l [iC'l-: SOIL INVES-|IG;\T'ION \I'ORK FOR THE CONSTRI.JCTION OF PROPOSED lOO Vl I' I
I

I('}: I'I-AN'T AT FREZERGUN.I N THE DISTRICT OF SOLJTH24 PARGANAS.

I
I

I
I

i
-----.1
I

i
I
I

h{
MECHANICAL
=T
*.1 a ANALYS IS
tiJ

=l
'r{
tJ-

Z
fr

a
I
X
rl
o
L_
:- L-
:-
Z I
=T / F
2
O-Z
L =
:
=
I!
;? \o
o\

t?
Lt
J7.

:-
a
U
a
Z&
6u
0=
;
l

It-
tU
F
o
w U
t&
UJ
*F
lPl
.z- -i
Lr]
'\O
o\
o\
.O
ci\

L! 5 a a Z U AF I

y. Z
-l
-!/ z.
rfr
f J J
t.L] OA d, -J -l
r- \o r-
o- u- a a ra a a U
-v
=i .) 38 NP 28 62 20 r8
F_e-t
:v
=
I) I

lp
=l
--?
-l

I) - I
I ai t-50 --f-vei\- sotl ro soft light
()l l0 i bluish ,' blackish gre)'
93 52 28 1.4
L* 36 07 56 37

:l I i siltl clay I clayey' silt

__1 i i \\ ith tlne sand at 4.5011
_7 -)
-) Do-Do- 95 57 )/. 25 2 sI 40 05 i I
5l -lJ
:l
[;
.

E-t I

, )"
) -Do - Do-Do- 83 5l 28 L) 35 11 J', l(,
-€
l) - l
1 (l-i-ir-,,r-r igtit tr l ,
I 30 N.P 2.62 26 l- 70 13
--
1

.'l

lr_j si
t
'tl
lver gre)' c layey
I

i
I
I

sandy silt I silty fine

I
I
I I

=
-
I

Fq{' sqn_{_1 itlr _nllgL_ -.f-i

07 50 -Do -- Dr-r -. Do - )1 N.P 24 18 122

ll
I

=
I'
.)
_ l --im=M
l008.
t4 N.P 23 tt6 ,o
i
- -.1
I

-{ i

:-
I) - (r
: ILP--_-+- 08
i Meditntt to stiff liglrt
3l
,_)
r
, 1i.50 -
-l ; 1i.95 i hluisir gre)'sandy siln'
92 45 25 20 2.61
ltrlp
- \
-lt
,. ii ---+i cliyl i_c_l?Jg'sf[, _ l_--t
ry [)o-Do-Do- l9 29 i6 ou ,o
i 15.60 i
84 47 73
=
-1
i15oo- i I
#\
ry ' l)- - tt io vt
i

-l S*
t,, *.d*rl r,sl,t 92 28 25 37 08 54 Irt
i 53
,---
.)
= l,-9 rl l7l0 ih,luish I blackish gre)
l

=\ v I

I i siltl clay I clayey silt

i
I

r-

- i i w ith flne sand intrusion ,11

i
!

1/
18.00- Do-Do-Do- 95 19 21 22 2.64 34 05 s3 | 42
"t-
:

:.-
- .:
i
-)!

I r -j I ti +5
i
- | - .----
I
-- -'
I

15 I 50 I rs
____-._-i

:: .'ll
11.00- | -Do-Do- Do- 85 44 24 20 30 _r)

T*.
-
-U
.)

lr- I l ll (,0 I l____

I
l__i ------1
I

T**
I

\Oll-: \.P. D: Disturtred sample. U: Un-disturbed sarnple.

+U = )(on-plastic. I

l).='Penerlariorr Sanrple. I

i
I

3 I
I

I
I

3,
I
J

I
t

9
i

__)
I
I

&
=q
il ASSOCIATED EN RVICES SHEET: A - 35

-I I)IT0.I t]C.J.: SOIL INVESTIGATION \\'ORK FOR THE

CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED IOO MT.
NTSTILTS

=I
_{l
I('I: I'LANT AT FREZERGUN.I N Ti-iE DISTRICT OF SOUTH24 PARGAI{AS.

-J
=l
E-t
il3
j

,^lo
'laa
I
I

IN DEX PROPERTIES
-
--I i:it
v;(

I
iu-
*
li
II
lrl
MECHANICI
ANALYS IS
L
I

l> t>
=T ii^\
l=l\-/
iZrl ta lur
I

I I IIXrr:
lc t
tr IF
I

l? I t lz 2.
l>
ln l- pl^
I

7A )t.f; o : l<
-
F-{

-,
:7
\./ ;: lJ
I ^
v
7 |
'r:!Ei-
I
I
I
tr
.,
l;Ai
I2il. | -:
t;
IF
UJ
td
I <.:
rQ
o\
\r/
\/lG l^ I

-, q - -l*
:l"n
I
I
C
-
u I rn UIn =
I I ,=
g l-
V
It LIJ
cF
--) Z
I

J lo-
tJ.ll-lo'
ls
..o

l'e, IF
-

--I F lq
; l- I .,. ,AF
;- iJJ
a/ =),: =l-I =
< ?-
Ilo-la a l,e Z lu
J tl
/.zal-
:l
a ''r
v
I
'-r
i i\l^,
lvl\l
lv
t -.'
l<
l-'
a
ti!
lo-
la
=Z
z(, (, l; li l

--I ta
ir
-1 I
00.50 I Filled up soit consisirng lo- I
I

4t
:v DI I II I of lighr yeltowislr gre),
N.P 30 59 t9 )')

I
I

-
I

-- Ver'), soft ro soft liglrr

I

0 I .50 I

i I 95 54 30 lzq 2.s8 37 05 48 a'7

--l I i01.95 I trtuish I blackish gre), tt I
i

i i siltr, clay, I clay,ev silt

I

=T .l
r initlrflnesandat4.50nt
0-1 50- ; -
I

8s 52 28
ll _l i os ro
24 l0
=Yv 4t
-J---

uo.uU - Mediurn lighr bluislr I

I
|
34

+__
l5 i15
i

I 3r i INP 28 i69 r
a, I)-3 06.60 lsilver grey clayey
I rorrdl, silt I silty fine
tt
,l I
lr
16 l)

-t
-l
l 09.00 I
I roncJ
-[)o
uith rrrica.
*
I
lr
lr
tr

li
lr
f--__f
:l [)o Do - 25 ---L iNP 262 i i l5
? i ()9.60 I
26 75
l, _
i

lt
i
1.. -.

Ill
i

-j
I r
I (r.ft,
r\
_-
I

-Utt.-[Jtl-Do-
..- :"

I I8 __i
24 t8
E-l
=t _ll il .10
82 _
_q iNPI
-Y
=t
li
Ir-8
rJ.)u
1,1.10
- Mediurn to sriff liglrr
b lu ish grey sarrdy s i lty
84 46 24 22 3r t6 47
.--*_.-,]
11
-)/
F
clay { clayey silt.
--, \
-ll

l'
- --+
-Do-Do-Do_
i r ).tru - i 92 43 23 20 2.61 28 ,l'1
E+\
=F [,-] I 5..+5
-
]
08 50 ,u ;

I
i

rtl riri to
I

-l So{i rned iu igiri rn 9t 1

28 23 36 -----j
I

=lY
b, I,-I0 I tt.60 n,uislr t blackish grey
t I
1
09 55 ro
1/. I

i
I

, I

J J
siltl' clay, I clayey silt I

=r
L I tv itlr fi ne sarrd intrus iorr
I

U ;;1;;-
I7.JU -tro-uo-uo_ I

-- 94 )') *__. _ i
49 27 4t
I

.:= I 2.60 33 06 53
*F- I
r9 95 i
I
i

:, :-.trtJ - __
:t 82 45 25 20 3l
-__1

:E
:-LQ--L
i
r8 41 38
-\q
-=
;

V i

= \o l l;: P = Petretrali.n Sample. N.P. = Non-plastic, D = Disturbed sarnple, U = Un-disturbed sample.

=U
-
U
3
0
9
ra
tli,

i\
iL
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERII\G SERVICE,S SHEE'[: A -36
q STIIVI}IARY OF TEST RESULTS
D-

I I'I{0.II:('-I': SOIL INVESTIGATION \\'ORK FORTHE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED

lOO M'T
\. I('II I'I,ANT A I FREZERGLJN.I IN THE DISTRICT OF SOLJTH 24 PARGANAS.
U
I

{ !

L! INDEX PROPERTIES
I

-l
I

{
I

MECHANICT\L
I
I

z
rq
I
I
I
rn .J.l
ANALYS IS
r>
I
I
I l1
X :
u 3j
'3 Z e
I z L
o
Z f =
-o

rq / F = tr.l
d,
()
o\
\.,/ \o
o\
rl, ,-)h
T c ult \o ..o
2il, =
-l =
U 9
*F
J o\ d\

.3 =
U
a
lr'l
6Q
a= e
:)
tr
(/)
9
F
a
V
Z
d,
l&
U
=Z
F;-
-
AF
frl rr.l

Z
o\

F
? J
[l OA
--7 t^/
I

-l
rrrl, \o r-
tfi

j._ -.1 a V) (] a 0 U

NP 29 t5 ;-i
L1
) 00 50 F illetl up so't ttitisting 39
ru I) ol' light !ellor,v ish gre)
- clarev silt witlr kattkars
-i, 0r 50 - Very soft to soft I iglrt 06 55 39

ielU 02 I0 bltrislr lblackish grey

i siltr clar I clavev silt
j u itlr f-ttte sand at 4,50rn
IJJJ
I

-eT'
-i

t)o --l--ui, - Do - Do -1
I iri 5l I 'lj
i irit)o-l--uc,-Do-Do- i
95 55 30 i 2 s8
-qU r I or+5 i _ __-_-]-
: (.)1.50 i -l)o - Do - Do - 85 5l 28 r5

*$
,
i

l'}-l -l;05.10 i

66
) 06J)0:l 1\4.,1i,,,, light bluish I
t
:
I) - I ()6 60 i silver grey clal'eY
sandy si lt I si lty flne
ry sand w'ith rnica.
=

{
l0 5() i -Do * Do -- [)o -
=

{ -(r I ll.l()
nq
E
1 i Mediurn to stiff light
3 50 - 92
'v
=
I 3.95 i f,ttrish grey' sandy siltY
I .U) A .1ry9y_silt
-\ ru 1500- i i
-f)o*Do--Do- 86
=
-ti l$0__L- -ii;-
-q \t
= i,-to rIr,ft nrediurtt light
FQq (i l7l0 if,ttrisli ! b lac k ish gre)
ry !siln c lay I clayey' silt
=
! ,r itt, fi rre sand intru s iolt
-== 1800- -Do-Do-Do
-
I

1'r
:=
t
n\
I 8..il5
ll00- -Do-Do-Do
-U ll,6-9 -l- -
!r.. \Ol[:: I) - l)erretration Sarnple.N.P. = Non-plastic. D=Disturbedsample, U =Un-disturbedsample'
=r,
5
v
I
=r
=U
-\ VICES
h-!i SHEET: A - ZT

=\ I'}lt( ).1 I:('I : SOII. INVEST'I(JAT IO}i_\\ ORK 'IHE C'ONSTRU.CTION

FOR
=
- v l('l:l)1..\NIAI' IIREZITRGUN.I IN THE DISTRTCT OF PROPOSED I.,O MT.
oF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
{
:=t
*{
PHYS ICAL, PROP
COM PRESSIVE
:=l TR IA X Iz\ I.
STRENGTH
ht Y DIRECI- --_-_---__..,i

LI t ijr.
,e
J
clt

='l
=.. =
\/ F
a
-.!
F
al

lE

(/
Z
rl

=r
'r.a
F 3-r a tr
---l "-Z
L
e F (i bf) e
F={
Z tJ- Z V Z al
J. Ou r'=

Y
1

e ,a
3-
LLJ
o 4
tl-
F
b V)
6
io 'l
-N'^l
b,l

U=C'
La.
'lE
(-
F

ril
Z
L!.'
t.=lt aYi\
in
I
irJ L/ Z Y,i .t)
-v .^^ r
io rJ u c *z d. p e. v U
lrrr U l) ELL
L' O- \/ o
I ; 00.5 0
I
0 i tie
=-
r.--, I) I

-\J I 0 t.50- l.8 t

LL I,,
I
_ I
I 02. l0
.-f.%.

0l 00-
.^ tt 01 ..15 0.00 - 0.50 0.06e0
I 0.s0 * I .00
=I
__ t 006 r.00*200
2.00- 4 00
0 0575
0 01e0
0 0t8()
=Y t, i
4()0-800 0 0 t55

=7 ,, irs;l-,rr-i DS-_t--: i--r__-i_--_-_*

T
.qil
i119?11

lr4, I I:00-rt8tl-i:q-l'-*_
r,-7;-iivi--i-roffi_
[60 i I
=r I t40 l
I

u, l- _
0.00 - 0.s0
-Fa i - 1.00 (ri8i
i ii II rzs II i
Lrrr roo ov
0.50
r.00
0 i

LL ; I :
tl 0.783 2 00 0.0270 i

I rso t
I

liro.jt)l'i.bl_i-l.jl+t#rg-+_---t_
i---- .- - ----'i-

+
l--
=>
=t
--+--_*__ i

-J 1,()1]1,lj]_-j-,-,'.]*'-.-Lt--j]
. i ln 00 i | 8tl*r:j3 l-- Lj; --i-- T- - I
.-ia
=t
r_r: r84s Il I i trt Ii I l 0
,, 18
i
I
0.00 _ 0.50

i l ou' I 0s0_ t 00
i
I

- i I lirr I 0.0470
I Il r.)u
l:: ' ^F i

=
I

0e36 I to0 200

I lso ii i iI 0 0t8i
-r J lll,i,-Firr ,
I l./) ili iI
i 1.00 -,1.00 0,0)10
=
r
J
0(1 sirJ_-t j7 I - -f-:'
t-*
j.)i
_1 --l -_---]---_---r
i t ! q.oo-8oo qql_r(l
"-3
i

rl |L'lurll-t--- I I I I i
I -iirr"xi- (rJ
8ll rr., i_* i

I ''" I
=
h- l-_ r
,,!_l I
h
#:, t':li__[1 i

\o II-S: U -- r.rn-disturbed Sarnple. p penetration

=
ULI . Un_consolidated Un-dr.ainecl
Sanrpre, D.S = Direct Shear test.,
U. : [Jnconflned Contpressiorr tcst.
test

n
l'
.h,i
rD: RVICES SHEET: A - ga
ra 1

tf
I'I(O.IHCT: SOII,INVESTIGATION \\'ORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF PROPOSED I()O MI'.
l
l( I'l i\NI \ t l ltlrZ[tt(;LrN.t I\
5 I IIE I)tStRI('T'olr sotrrH ].t PARGANAS.

Ys r-a'--A---i_ PROPERTIES
T COM-PM STRENCTH
CONSOLIDATION
J TRIAXIAL / UNCONFINED I DIRECT
SHEAR I lr!

JI =
ll=tt
IrtJ
I
ll
l!.?
IZ
r-.,
I
I r

-
./

r- ,/ (,
I A.
r V
r

f : 'r.

IJ
ll-lr-z-
j

=,/
: ,{, F ri ,.:
--7 jj i&r.
-.+
lk
I or.i
l-=
I z
I
i

I
Z a- g,n,
- -J tr
L
O?Z \/ I - c'l I L! a
r,.ii
I
I

r!zg
.l
' d- i tjJ
AI
o u =aQa \-
ll-15 li5X
I

, 3(21 Jc/,F
ltg
I

= LtJ ctt
4 O!.tJU
iz*
I

Y
i

' /r ,; (-) E, V loA,

I

a
I

(, o- U o- \-/
I I

i J, I
F \.-/
t,C
I

il-)i- l- O l i
I

mi0- r--r--...-._*
I

J
rl I

t-
il
I

i) I

iJ
'

iil- -*-- ---- ---

I I

i
*--1-
i
____t I
I

,,(Jo -l
; 0.50 -- II 0 056s
I
I

i rL-vl xr?xr) I
i

i t .00 i

0.2 s 0.980 I roo-2oo l ooi75 I

0.50
I .+.oo-8.oo
zoo*4oo I o oz7o I

l
4.7 5
| -l i oous I

J?
J'
I

I' - .l
:
*e l) - )
..
I :
I) -
r
(r

r{ l
l, - ti

{ l
r -l i 0.00 0 50 0.0-r80
; 0.50 .00 I

-L
,r
/56 i r.00 100
I zoo- 4oo 0.0 r 70
rqID
I

r'li
i i --i------.----f
: Illi ()o- r ttit I tit ---l- { !q:-!.qq I
0.00e0
-l-
its/r(l
I l ti,6() i I
;

l,-I0 j I

-..f --1--__*
Itoi(I iit8t
_ t------
i
i

ir
2
l. -.1
Ile50
i le e5
I rrl ()i i
Ir:4 I
i
I

i
U, 0.00 - 0.50 -f-
0.50 - I 00
i

J i
I

UU
o o"l7o i

i,ilVv 1.00 - 2.A0 0 0i80

i,il
rli
i

2.00 - 4.00 0.0175

.tf t--'--- -..---
i

- r- .40 -
I
4 8.00
l 11.00 r l8i r--ll
I l.j8 I l-
I I

1,.= l, ll
h
-
\t)[[-S: tj - [ilt-tjisttn'becl Sarnple.P - Perretration Sarnple.
[' t"] L'rr-eo'rsolidateil Urr-clririrecl test
D.S = Direct Shear test.. U. = Unconfined Compression test.
I

.0
--
\.
t
c
e
g ,.--_J
l

I
I
=.I
-ra
==Ju
-l
-\: -"1

=il|
= ;{ ICES
-d i
=*l I,R0.IEt.T:S0ILINVESTIGo,,o9I9IPRoPoSEDI00,,l
il:=q I I('[ P.AN'AT FREZERGUN.I IN THE DISTRICT
I

SOU'U Z+ PANCANAS.
{
|-
* OP
.
_-I i-:-tlryl S i e i
:'._J.---..|.i.;';;i;#nopEffi-_i ; ; : .- I

-<
=a
jj_it i 1-SSNaeness
TRIAXIAL / LJNC
-
I ,'
i-- SHEAR u
-=-r l2
LI iE ta
l- I
t:
l; I I I3 I I I I lo;
-r oO

='l t,j ;; lV I ,; l==; I t l0

i".
j=:
r-{
-r
r-i
;?!i
.i#
1i,= i7
:i il
t, lr
1; l
l,q l;:-'t Ie,ll
tie.^lI i *i I; ^ i:
l>i
-;;
_=tr l- iilH 1-
iu iz='=ii'i951?-r_51
lz) Flt;i;-': ='i l,->51
J3=
l!*'=
If('r
e I

t:
"., i: ls
Ll- I ;

l'*Z
192
\.zr
Z I ii
=Y
-

* u cttl ;!lxs, lEf;5l laa: I5E

=
.-rl
.l
=l
\7 rl./.i
\r'

=r1
\,i
I

I
12fr;1
-E:lo:lUJ
) _ I E
9l d, v I t4 b I o
)4
\.,. ?rti
lizYl s lpFy
iHJ
lfir
Uo-\r' I --
=t
;-l I) - I

:f I) -
0 t .50-
0t r0
r.8 t
I 'l-r
I.JJ
---l
-l
-t I |
l. -.. - -
(X)
._ -___-l
I

\D ) , ()l I
I

-*" .--
:l
= II 0.00 - 0.50 0.0685
- -.*_--l

a,
0.2 3
0.50 - I .00
* 2.00
0 0570
r.032 l .00 0.0i 8s
=-.',
=l
2.00 - 4.00
? r.34 4.00 - 8.00
0.02 80
0 0 t 50 _
=rt
-t
\a
-T
-:l
-.ra
=r
Fr{ r .50
r
l
I
r .40 Ur 0.5 7 0.00 - 0.50 0 04e5
-f U I.J r.00 05e
0.s0 - r .00 o 0380
i

r 00 200
I

1.2-s
0.0t 7s I

-h-t I .50
2.00 4.00 i 0.0t80 I

4.00 * 8.00
't
t ) 0 0r00
= I)
! _1
1

- l)
-q\t .l r8.00- r 8l r.35 Uc
+q
= t I8 15
0.3 9 0.00 * 0 50 0.05 70
a UL] t l5 0-lI
0 50 t.00 0,0.160
= r s0
0884 I 100_100 0 0i75
-S
Fr
=
ii
|-.'*-.-.^-
-!,
) r2.00* I .83
t 75
2 00 - 4.00
4.00 - 8.00
0.02 60
0.0 t25
U I
j
.
I'-I]
-...*--.
ll. (r0
=
+U
-a \oI'liS: LJ ' Ljrr-disrurbed Sarnple. p = penetration
[]t r - Un_consolidated Lrn-drained test Sarnpre, D.S = Direct Sheartest., U. _- Unconflned Conrpression test.
\
U
s
o
o
 SHEET: A - 40
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

I,RO.IEC'.I: SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTIoN oF PRoPoSED IOO MT.
I('l: I't-AN'f AT FREZERGUNJ IN THE DISTRICT oF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
YS ICAL PRO RTIES
(.O\4PRESSIVE STRENCTH CONSOLIDA-TION
TRIAXIAL UNCONFINED DIRECT frl
,- St'l trA R

F a
a
L! .'r Z ()
/ ,u
F
a b
?^l
iC
Fc'l
c trv
o.
| 'l
a
= fr'l a\\ e F
I'
Z F 9,ri^ o* cfl
z'l-
t
X, \./ fJ- 'l
zii
:- IL
z:- Iir,') = (^.
1- r\/ ^,
= o7z -\;.\
. O rjl
: c,'l ua
, -
g

o)u
'

6 7\J
* :- -a Sc u :lt Jd,F
OFU
tA \l)

;'= * rJ 2!) Z Y', crl ir-,] u

,*1
a U
\./
*V, (J
xb v AU -i--
<l F- tr
r*
oav
(tnv

, -l .' oo*itl t7L) t.37 --l--

i
-l)__.1
,.],, 0 r 50- t.32 Uc 0.00 - 0.s0 0.06 7s
:[ -l 0t 95 0.50 - r .00 0.05 60
0 2s 0 e54 r.00 2 00 () 0i85
0.5 0 2 .00 - .1 .00 0 0275
0 75 4.00 - 8 00 0.0 l.l0
.f

[)

+ 1.42 D.S.
l)
-l r .84
i) 5 i09.60
I Ir) 50 - I .49
l) -(r ll t0
I il5tt-
l) 1-+. t{)
.t
-)
15 00 r.85 i
I
t44 0.s8
t I 5.-r5 rlll
i
I
II uu Ii roo
125
i
060 )(l

Ittl
iI lli-i--l------l-----
I I i;o - -t-
I

I
i I I

t, 1860
+ Ie.50 0.4 I

t te e5
I oso-roo ioo4(,5
r50 0.4 3 58 i I.oo-2.00 I ooi7.i
I .75
2.00
|i :oo-4oo
400-800 Ii 00ir:
o o2to

-1 r .83

!'
\t )I [:\. t Ll n-disturhcd Sarlple. P - Penetration Sample. D.S ., Direct Slreartest., U. = Unconflnecl Conrpression tcsr.
Ij[r Ii n-consol idated Un-drainecl test

,
,
.-
-
h,
t ASSOCI,\TE D ENGIN EERING SERVI.CES SHEET: A - 4l
|l SUM}IARY OF TEST RESULTS

h, PRO.IECT: SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED 100 MT.
U IC'E PLANT AT FREZERGLINJ IN THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH 24 PARGANAS.
t\
l -t- PH YSICAL PROPERTIE S

$ I

i
COMP RESSIVE STRE NGTH
].RIAXIAL I' [-INCONFINED ,' DIRECT
CO NSOLIDA rION
l^
I

rJJ

d! l--
r?_
,- SH EAR
Cll
-i
l-
I

t l*-
l_:
in ts
F a
O
I
I [I].r Z U
l?- rr'E
T
- Li- v
t/ !
'/_ i
ii e
.Z
b Ft.l
cn -t-
F
F=
r-r-
il. -r"t) z"i Cu z;!
i,
tJ-t.
ii-
i- :L)
a
'-7
a- d., IIJ
OH tr6 OZZ -j c,'L L!a
+ Z )rA E
l/4

6 rr) 2 O -(
U
Sr, ,,d,; -ru
-

3-l- t
g

;g .t) rA v) \\

{ru ln
-

F . l'-
cP'r)
I

2_ic- =a
1u )t) or) ir I r \

-i, io
Q d, V
(, o-
L!h
C: c &, v ou
i
.si,
\,/ UU 0) Uo---
f, -+- -

- r 00 50 i r.i9
ht I

iD r8r
i 0r 50- r.33
I i 9?.1-q-
Irt 0i.00-
i
I r .80 t.29 LJ r' 0.20 0.00 - 0.50 0.0660
fD-- tl 03..15
I

0.s0 - r .00 0.05 s0

UU
I
I
4.25 0.22 1o r .006 r .00 - 2.00 0.03 70
2.00 *
I

h.
I
I
0.50 4.00 0 0165
U
I

0.75 400-800 0.t) i -1 5

\ l.i5
I

i
0-i 5 0-- 1 .82
I 1l 05 I!)
l si
' t.-

()6.00 - D.S.
fl ) 06.60
I ..1-l 310

i
{t -+ i os.to
i 07 50-
I
I84 I47 DS. 320

I
I

irO50- lss 1.49 D.S.

!0 6 ,_ll:10
lr
330

{' ll5() ; l8-1 r.-ri Ljt 056 0 00 - 0.50 ().0-160

I t r eS 0 50 - r.00 0 01s0
qt
:
LJU r00
t.25
().58 )tl u.730 r.00 - 2.00
2.00 - 4.00
0.0260
0.0 l 70

tr
il
il
I.50 4.00 - 8.00 0.00 8 s I
|'r
; I 5.00- r .85 t.46 t"
t!
I i r5.60 r'!

,b t6 s0 - r .82 t.32
th () i l7l0
,{u
I
hr 1
I tt .
()0- r.8 t.i4 tlt 0.42 -l ooo-0ry
0.50- 100 I
r!
ll
I

I
I 9..+5
UU r.25 044 l('i 0.9 t0 r .00 - 2.00
i
0.0-l-10
00355
I

ha
:

2.00-4.00 i 002s0
I

I
r.50 I

4.00 - 8.00 |
i

ltD
I
t.75 0.0 I 20 I

hr ) il----l
?2.00- I
r 8i r.38
lu
h\.
I -l2 A--i
Ir- I :

IU \OIt:S: Li '- [in-disturbed Sanrple. P: Penetration Sanrple. D.S = Direct Sheartest.. U. = Uncont'ined Compression tesr.
\ l. rt' - L'n-cotrsolidated t.ln-dr.ained test

f
e
I
I