Typed Copy of ANNEXURE - A

Order Sheet
In the Court of CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
HASSAN
Filing No : EX/34/2016
Registration No: EX/34/2016
Decree Holder Vs Judgment Debtor
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
1) Maddamma 1) Rajaiah
2) Beluraiah
3) Kalaiah
4) Rajaiah

Nature of Case: EX.Petition

Provision of Law CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 242
Advocate For Decree Holder Sri/Smt S.P.JAYAPPA
Date of Filing: 28-06-2016
Date of Registration: 28-06-2016
Relief
Petition filed under order 21 rule 11 of CPC Sri SPJ advocate for
O.S.No.140/2003 D.D 16/03/2005
1. Decree amount -
2. Interest –
3. Cost awarded in the Suit – 418/-
4. Present Execution Costs –
5. Previous EX Costs –
Cost of copy –
6. Advocate fee –
Total, 418/-
1. Arrest the Judgment Debtor and detention in the Civil Prison

CAO/CMO
Sd/- 28/6/16
Registered and Made over this case to the CIVIL Judge & JMFC
court for disposal according to law.

Sd/- 28.6.2016
CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC
Arkalgud

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Sl.No. Date Proceedings
28.06.2016
DHr by SPJ/BKM Issue C/N to Jdr
By 1/10
Sd/- 28/06
 IN THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AT ARKALGUD
Ex.Case No. 34/16

Under case 21 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure ____

Decree-Holder’s Name Smt.Maddamma

O.S.No.140/2003
Number of Suit

Smt. Maddamma /o Lak Patel Thammaiah

Decree-Holders
Dead by LR’s
Sri. Patel P.T. Gopala
S/o Lak Patel Thammaiah
Aged about 74 years R/o At
Parasarahally village, Doddamogge Hobli,
Arkalagud Taluk

Judgment- 1. Rajaiah S/o Mariyaiah

Dedtor/s Aged about 53 years
2. Beluraiah S/o Channaiah
Aged about 53 years
3. Kalaiah S/o Channaiah
38 years
4. Rajaiah S/o Channaiah,
Aged about 48 years,

All are R/at at Parasarahally village,

Doddamogge Hobli, Arkalagud Taluk

No. and Trial Court 1 Appellate High

Date of Decree Court Court
OS.No.140/03 R.A.
D/D 16/03/05 D/D R.S.A No
D/D
Whether any
appeal has been - No -
preferred from
the Decree
Payment or
adjustment - No -
made, if any
Previous
application if - No –
any, with date &
result
 Rs. P.
1. Decree Amount
2. Interest on Principle Rs ……… from
date of suit up to date at percent P.A.
3. Cost awarded in the Suit. 418. 00
4. Cost of the Appellate Court
5. High Court Costs
6. Costs of copies
7. Previous Execution costs
8. Present Execution costs
9. Advocate’s Fee
10 ……………………..

TOTAL 418 00
Less amount received with counter
interest thereon at 6% per annum
Balance 418 00
Against whom The Judgment Debtor/s
To be executed
1. Attachment and sale of movables of
Judgments Debtor to be shown by
Decree holder or his agent.
2. Arrest of Judgment Debtor and
detention in the civil prison.

Mode in which the 3. Attachment and sale of schedule

immovable property.
Assistance of the
4. The decree holder prays that the said
Court is sought decree be transferred to the Court of
……. (through the District Court of ……)
for execution as the judgments debtor
is residing carrying on the
business/possess properties within the
jurisdiction of the Court.
eÉ.¦.Dgï. gÀªg À ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ r.ºÉZï.Dgï. gÀªgÀ À zÁªÁ¸ÀéwÛUÉ ()
vÀAmÉ vÀPÀgÁgÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀÄwÛgÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ eÉ.r.Dgï.gÀªg
À ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
¹«¯ï §AzsÀSÁ£ÉAiÀÄ°èqÀ®Ä DzÉñÀªÁUÀ¨ÉÃPÁV ¥ÁæxÀð£É

Sd/- Sd/-
Advocate for the Decree Holder Decree Holder

I/We the Decree Holder/s above named do hereby declare

that what is stated above is true to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief.

:µÉqÀÆå¯ï:
CgÀPÀ®UÀÆqÀÄ vÀ®ÆèPÄÀ ºÉÆøÀì ªÀÄUÉÎ ºÉÆç½ ¥Àg¸ À Àgº
À À½î UÁæªÀĺÀ½îgÀĪÀ ºÀ¼É ¸ÀªÀð £ÀA8
d¥ÀºÀÄgÀ¸ÁV ºÉƸÀ ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA57 gÀ°è 0.2 UÀÄAmÉ RgÁ§Ä ¸ÉÃj 4 JPÀgÉ d«ÄäUÉ ZÀPÀÄ̧A¢
¥ÀÄ: ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA.8gÀ d«ÄãÀÄ ¥À: aPÀÌ¥ÉàÃUËqÀgÀ ªÀÄUÀ dªÀgÉÃUËqÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀĨÉâÃUËqÀgÀ
d«ÄãÀÄ. G: PÉgÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÀt«£ÀPÀÄ¥Éà UËqÀ zÀ: ¸ÀªÉð £ÀA.8gÀ d«ÄãÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ gÀ¸ÉÛ.

Sd/-
Decree Holder
29/8/93
DHR by SPJ
Jdy 3.4 SRN
Jdr 1.2. Absent
Jdr 1(a) – RPAD Not claim
Jdr 1 (b) (c) – absent Notice issued to JDR No.1(a)
through RPAD returned as
not claimed. Called out
absent. Service held
sufficient.
For orders by 02-09-2023

Sd/- 29/8
2nd Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC..
Arakalgud

COMMON ORDERS ON IA.No.1 TO 3 FILED BY THE DHR

U/O. XXII R. 3 & 4. U/O.XXII R.9 OF CPC & U/SEC 5 OF
LIMITATION ACT

When the case is posted for inquiry, the DHR filled these three
applications dated: has 05.09.2022.

2. The DHR has filed I.A.No. 1 U/O XXII Rule 3 & 4 of CPC, IA.No2
U/O.XXII Rule 9 of CPC and I.A.No.3 U/Sec. 5 of Limitation Act
and prays this Court to implead the legal heirs of deceased JDR
No. 1 as JDR No. 1 [a] to 1[c] to this petition, by setting aside the
abatement order by condoning the delay in filing these
applications.
 IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AT ARKALGUD
PRESENT

Smt. ___________, BBM, LL.B.

Civil Judge (Jr. Dn), Arkalgud.
: : O.S. No. 340/2003 : :

Plaintitt :- Smt. Maddamma, w/o. Lak Patel Thammaiah,

80 years, Parasanehalli Village.
Doddamagge Hobli, Arkalgud Taluk.

(By Sri.S.P.Jayappe, Advocate)

-V/S-

Defencanus :- 1. Rajaiah S/o.Mariyaiah,

40 years.
2. Beluraiah S/o.Channaiah,
40 years.
3. Kalaiah S/o.Channaiah,
38 years,
4. Rajaiah s/o. Channaiah,
35 years,

All are R/o. Parasanehalli Village

Doddamagge Hobli, Arkalgud Taluk

(By Sri.K.Dharmappa.Advocate

1. Date of institution of suit : 30/05/2003

2. Nature of the suit : DECLARATION AND

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

3. Date of recording evidence : 20/12/2003

4. Date of which Judgement

Pronounced : 10/03/2005

5. Total duration : Year/s Month/s Day/s

01 09 17

Sd/-
(HEMAVATHI) 16.3
CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN).
A R K A L G U D.
16) ISSUE NO 4 :- In view of my answer to
Issues No.1 to 8, the plaintiff is entitled for the relief of
Declaration and Permanent Injunction against the defendants.
Hence, I answered Issue No.4 in the 'Affirmative'.

17) ISSUE NO.5 :- For the reasons discussed above,

I proceed to pass the following :-

::ORDER::

The suit filed by the plaintiff is hereby decreed with cost.

It is hereby declared that the plaintiff is the owner of the
suit schedule property and the defendants, their men or, agents,
or anybody claiming under them are hereby restrained by an order
of Permanent Injunction from interfering with the peaceful
possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property.

(Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, revised,

corrected, and then pronounced by me in the open Court on this
the 16th day of March, 2005.)

Sd/-
(HEMAVATHI) 16.3
CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN).
A R K A L G U D.