Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning Activity Package and Reading Performance Among Maguindanaon Pupils
Learning Activity Package and Reading Performance Among Maguindanaon Pupils
Learning Activity Package and Reading Performance Among Maguindanaon Pupils
Procedure
Results and Discussion
Prior to the conduct of study, the researchers Table 1. Level of pupils’ Word Recognition in pretest.
followed a structured approval process. Initially,
approval was sought from the Dean of the College of
Graduate School, followed by the necessary
permissions from the Schools Division Superintendent
of Sultan Kudarat. Once these approvals were secured,
the researcher proceeded to coordinate with the
principal of Lagandang Elementary School. A list of The table shows the mean scores in pretest of the
the identified respondents was submitted to the control group equivalent to 93.66 described as
principal to facilitate the scheduling of the instrument instructional reader respectively. This means that the
administration. pupils have minimal mistakes on pronouncing words
in /ph/ difference between /p/ and /f/ and a slight
The Learning Activity Package was then administered weaknesses or self- correction and insertion.
to the Grade V and Grade VI remedial classes, with Experimental group has a mean score of 91.63
each session lasting approximately 40 minutes and described as instructional reader. The same case is
including the implementation of at least two (2) observed with the control group in their phonological
activities per session. After conducting 4-5 sessions weaknesses. Both mean of control and experimental
encompassing a total of 8 different activities, group were described as instructional this means that
evaluations were carried out to assess the pupils' pupils only read a range of 90-96% using the PHIL-
IRI Standards.
speaking fluency and reading performance. The
assessment process involved the personal
Table 2. Level of Pupils’ Word Recognition in Post-
administration of a standardized 50-item Pre-test and
test.
Post-test by the researcher. The study aimed to
evaluate the standardized reading performance of
Grade VI Maguindanaon pupils using the Philippine
Informal Reading Inventory (PHIL-IRI) scoring for the
year 2018, in conjunction with the implementation of a
Learning Activity Package focused on reading and
phonetics. To assess the significance of the disparity in It is demonstrated on the table 2 that control group is
mean reading performance gains between the Control describe as instructional reader as manifested by its
and Experimental Groups, both in Silent and Oral
Reading, a Z-test was employed at a significance level
of 0.05.
mean of 94 .44. This means that after the level wherein pupils comprehend in the range of 74
implementation of LAP pupils have been observed to percent and below. As presented by its mean of 53.38
commit minimal errors or omissions and repetition. and 72.17 respectively. Pupils are still deteriorating in
Also they have slightly mispronounced words with their reading level and do not show progress at all after
/ph/ sounds.The same result is established by the the implementation of the LAP. Furthermore, this
experimental group. The mean of 95.33 depicts that could be credited to the idea that the pupils do not
pupils are instructional reader. This could be attributed decipher what they are reading. Maybe because of
to some errors or their phonetics awareness such as short span of time where LAP is being implemented to
pronouncing the difference between /p/ and /f/, and /v/ them. However, Children with limited exposure to
and /b/. books and reading in their home, including limited
experience of being read to be at risk of reading
All groups have noticeable increase of achievement difficulties. Children Limited exposure to vocabularies
from pretest to posttest. However, both groups have affect the ability to acquire reading skills.
achievements that belongs to description of
Instructional level were pupils read a range of Table 5. Level of pupils’ comprehension during oral
90-96%. The above result is also anchored on the reading in the pretest.
notion of Venkatagiri and Levis (2007) as cited by
Barrios (2017) which said that the maintenance of
explicit modular instruction can help learners develop
phonological awareness which play a key role in
second language speech intelligibility.
Table 3. Level of pupils’ comprehension during silent Control group are considered as instructional level in
reading in pretest. the pretest as showed by the weighted mean of 61.84.
Meaning pupils shows adequate background and
knowledge for a topic and can access text quickly. In
contrary, Experimental group is in frustration level as
indicated by its mean of 43.78. This means that student
only reached 79 percent below from the total
percentage of score. Furthermore, pupils shows
struggles in reading with numerous errors. The
The level of pupils reading comprehension after silent
homogeneity of the result confirm that all students
reading in pretest of control group and experimental
subjected for the experimentation have the same
group are manifested by their mean of 40.94 and 29.87
reading level prior to the conduct of the remediation
described as in frustration level wherein pupils
(Barrios, 2017). In addition, the positive feeling that
comprehend in the range of 74 percent and below. This
arises from spending time with books in a loving
means that pupils do not understand what they are
context provides story foundation and intrigue
reading. This could also be traced by the lack of
motivation for the long cognitively challenging
background of knowledge in reading the text and
process of loving to read. To achieve reading standards
cannot handle complex but common task.
usually calls for long hour of drill and worksheet.
Table 4. Level of the pupils’ comprehension during
Table 6. Level of the pupils’ comprehension during
silent reading in posttest.
oral reading in posttest.
Table 7. Analysis on Mean Gain in Silent Reading of Based from the findings of the research, it is concluded
Control Group and Experimental Group that the Learning Activity Package has significant
effects on the level of the reading performance in word
recognition and reading comprehension. Therefore,
the Learning Activity Package is effective to improve
the reading performance in word recognition and
reading comprehension of the Grade 6 Maguindanaon
pupils of Lagandang Elementary School.
The result revealed that the mean gain of control group
and experimental group in silent reading resulted to z-
References
computed value of 5.81 which is higher than the z-
tabulated value of 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance. It
Abu, A.O. (2001) Resource Utilization in Classroom. The Effect
is safer to affirm that the difference among control of Learning Activity Package to Teach Biology at the Senior
group and experimental group is higher than as Secondary School Level. Journal of science teacher’s association of
expected. Thus it is a strong evidence to reject the null Nigeria (JSTAN) 40 (2), 103-106
hypothesis which states that there is a significant
Adams, M., Foorman B., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998).
difference in the mean gain of reading performance Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum.
among control and experimental in terms of silent Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
reading.
Almihmadi, M.M. (2012). Teaching English Phonetics to Non-
native Speakers of English: an Innovative Constructivist Paradigm.
Table 8. Analysis on Mean Gain in Oral Reading of Frontiers of Language and Teaching, Vol. 3, 41- 48.Elizabeth,
Control Group and Experimental Group M.E.S.(2004). Methods of Teaching English. New Delhi: Discovery
Publishing House. ISBN 81-7141-809-0
The result shows that there is a significant difference Card,M. P.(2006). The Effects of a Reading Comprehension
Intervention Package on Increasing Third Grade Students’
among the main gain in oral reading of control group Comprehension Skills .Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies,
and experimental group. The z-computed value of 4.41 Walden University.
which is greater than the z-tabulated value of 1.96
Cotter, Jennifer, (2021). "Understanding the Relationship between
present enough evidence to declare that the difference
Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension: Fluency Strategies
among the reading performance of the control group as a Focus for Instruction" (2012).Education Masters.Paper 224.
Kapler, Philip G., joint author. (1972). Learning Packages in Squid the Story and Science of Reading Brain. New York,
American Education. New Jersey:Educational Technology pp.81-83.ISBN 0-06-018639-0.OCLC471015779.
Publications. ISBN 0-87778-047-1
Affiliations and Corresponding Information
Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Barkley, E. A. (2009, ). Effects
of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth- Haren M. Catalan, LPT, MAEM
grade students: Implications of practice. Preventing School Failure
54(1), 12–23. doi:10.3200/PSFL.54.1.12-23]
Lagandang Elementary School
Department of Education – Philippines
Navarro,I,C. Locutionary Speech Form: Strategies in Teaching Billy D. Fronda, LPT, MAT
Reading to Maguindanaon Pupils. (2011)
Kalamansig National High School
Ofuan, F.N. (2016) The Effectiveness of Three Methods of Teaching Department of Education – Philippines
Reading on Students’ Achievement in Comprehension. Journal of Madonna R. Antonino, LPT, MAED
Educational and Social Research. MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy
Vol. 6 No.1 ISSN 2239-978X ISSN 2240-0524
Mamali Elementary School
Department of Education – Philippines
Rosen, David J. (2005) Some Tips For Improving Your Arnel F. Pradia, LPT, MAELT
Reading And Writing Skills. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from World
Wide Web: http://www.usalearns.org/reading-to-learn-english
Lebak Legislated National High School
Department of Education – Philippines
Smith, S., Simmons, C., & Kameenui, E. (1995). Synthesis of
research on phonological awareness: Principles and implications
for reading acquisition. National Center to Improve the Tools of
Educators. Retrieved December 13,2001, from the World Wide
W e b :
http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech21.htm